AzTrials
AzTrials

Pulmonary Hypertension6-APPNCT04633538

Evaluation of a New 6 Minute Walk Test Smartphone App in Patients With Pulmonary Hypertension

An observational study of Pulmonary Hypertension, run by Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust at 1 site in United Kingdom.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Comparison of standard 6 minute walk test with 6 minute walk test smartphone app. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Pulmonary Hypertension
What is being tested?
6MWT smartphone app
Type of treatment
Medical device
How many people
30 participants
Where
1 siteUnited Kingdom
Study dates
15 Jan 2018to 1 Apr 2020
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Patients undergoing follow up in the PAH clinic will be eligible for participation. They will be approached by a member of the clinical team for consideration and recruited. We will recruit 30 compliant patients to enrol in the study.

Who may be able to join

  • Participant is willing and able to give informed consent for participation in the study
  • Male or Female, aged 18 years or above
  • Diagnosed with PAH who are able to undertake 6MWT off-oxygen
  • Being of PAH group 1 or 4
  • Participant owns a compatible smartphone (Android or iPhone) and is able to use it.

Who cannot join

  • Long term oxygen therapy
  • Cognitive impairments
  • Rheumatological diseases that limit the measurement of finger Oxygen saturations
  • PAH groups 2, 3 or 5
  • Cannot use a smartphone
  • Pregnancy.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United Kingdom1 site
  • Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust

    Oxford

Other trials in United Kingdom

About this study

Official title: Evaluation of a New 6 Minute Walk Test Smartphone App in Patients With Pulmonary Hypertension (The 6-APP Study)

Comparison of standard 6 minute walk test with 6 minute walk test smartphone app.

Read the detailed description

Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension (PAH) is a progressive illness that; if not diagnosed early or left untreated, can be a severe life limiting condition . It is a chronic disease of the pulmonary vasculature, with vascular proliferation and remodelling of the small pulmonary arteries leading to a progressive increase in pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR). This can ultimately lead to right heart failure and premature death . The predominant symptom of PAH is dyspnoea on exertion, with a decrease in exercise capacity, and most patients present with this symptom .

PAH is an uncommon condition, affecting about 6000 patients in the United Kingdom , and due to its rarity, the NHS commissions 7 centres to care for patients with PAH. Oxford University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust works closely with the Royal Brompton Hospital to provide care for patients with PAH in Oxfordshire and the surrounding region.

The six-minute walk test (6MWT) is a standard method for measuring exercise capacity in patients with cardiopulmonary disease such as PAH. The 6MWT measures how far a patient can walk in 6 minutes. Walking is an activity performed every day, by most patients except for those most severely limited. By assessing patients' ability to exercise, the 6MWT provides a global assessment of respiratory, cardiovascular, neuromuscular and cognitive function. The 6MWT does not differentiate what limits the patient, nor does it assess maximal exercise capacity. Instead, the 6MWT allows the patient to exercise at a daily functional level, and is a useful tool for assessing changes after a therapeutic intervention, and correlates with a subjective improvement in dyspnoea .

In PAH the 6MWT is used to evaluate patients' response to treatment, with an increase in 6MWT distance of greater than 42m being considered a clinically significant improvement . Furthermore, change in 6MWT distance correlates with VO2 max (maximum rate of oxygen consumption measured during exercise), NYHA class (classification of patients' daily limitation) and mortality in PAH patients, providing an objective assessment of disease progression, prognosis and response to treatment. It is a universally accepted test as it is safe and easily performed by the patient.

The 6MWT has become the primary end-point for many trials, and as a surrogate invalidated survival outcome for all placebo controlled trials of PAH therapy . It is used by regulatory bodies to determine whether a treatment should be approved. However, there is much discrepancy between whether it is the total distance walked at baseline prior to treatment, a decrease in total distance walked over time or a percentage increase in walking distance that correlates best with survival outcome. The investigators hypothesize that it is all 3 of these measures, and that having a validated and more reproducible 6MWT would help assess patients and guide treatment strategies better.

The test is usually performed in hospital, by walking along a hospital corridor, where many factors on the day of the test can affect patients' performance, including tiredness, unfamiliarity with the environment or anxiety. The test typically requires 2 physiologists to monitor the distance walked by the patient, their oxygen saturations by pulse oximetry, and to record symptoms felt during the test. To improve the assessment of a patient's exercise capacity using a 6MWT, the investigators hypothesize that the test would reflect more the patient's functional status, if it were undertaken prior to the hospital outpatient appointment. The investigators have designed a mobile-phone "app" that allows patients to perform the 6MWT within the patient's home environment. This is felt to be more appealing to the patients, and would reduce the time spent in hospital on the day of their outpatient appointment.

The 6MWT app is categorised as a mobile-health (m-health) system, a form of telehealth whereby healthcare is delivered at a distance using smartphones. By utilizing biometric collection devices such as a pulse oximeter monitor with Bluetooth capability, m-health can be used to measure the oxygen saturation levels in the blood from patients, and transmit them to a secure server, allowing them to be reviewed by cardiologists and other healthcare professionals.

The evidence-base for m-health as a tool for assessing physical fitness is increasingly established. This new approach not only offers the opportunity for reliable collection of data, but provides the infrastructure to do this at scale and will allow decisions on patients' health to be based on more frequent and more accurate information.

There are no known risks to undertaking a 6MWT in the community as walking is an activity of daily living, and all patients are encouraged to walk daily.

The population to be studied will be those with PAH who are currently assessed with a 6MWT. Once the app has been validated, patients with any type of cardiorespiratory disease who are assessed with a 6MWT could use the app, for example patients with chronic obstructive airways disease, heart failure, renal failure, and pre-transplantation work up.

The 6MWT results form part of the NHS data set collected by NHS England for patients with PAH, and it would be beneficial to have a more reproducible assessment, whose results could be compared between the 7 centres providing care for these patients. At present, there is much variability in how 6MWTs are performed between units, and the app would reduce this variability.

The 6MWT has been undertaken at the John Radcliffe hospital for 5 years and the investigators will also retrospectively analyse the data from the 6MWT that have previously been undertaken. The data on patients will be pseudo-anonymised, i.e. no personal information like name, surname or address, will be used, but the investigators will keep date of birth, gender, diagnosis, dates and results of the 6MWT, date and causes of death. As part of the clinical care team, reviewing the data is part of the normal standard of care for patients with PHT. The data is collected on the Solus cardiac reporting system and can be extracted from this database. The data will be pseudo-anonymised by the Principle Investigator for analysis, and then shared with the wider research team. The data will be analysed to look at distance walked, and change in oxygen saturation and heart rate during the test. The investigators will analyse the data over time, to look for changes in these parameters and correlate these with outcome data, i.e. mortality.

The study aims at demonstrating that patients are able and willing to use the app for the 6MWT and the measurements obtained by the app are comparable to the ones obtained in hospital.

Being tested
6MWT smartphone app
Medical subject headings
Hypertension, Pulmonary

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • 6MWT smartphone appDevice

    Use of smartphone app to measure 6 minute walk test (6MWT)

Study groups in NCT04633538
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
6MWT app groupPatients who received the 6MWT app and performed tests at the clinic and in the community using the app
Receives: Device: 6MWT smartphone app

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Percentage of Participants Who Perform App-based Home 6MWT

    Percentage of participants who perform app-based home 6MWT.

    Measured: 6 months

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Difference in Walked Distance Between 6MWT Test at the Clinic as Measured by Physiologists and the App in Indoor Mode

    Comparison of the indoor app-based 6MWD against simultaneous clinic 6MWD: mean and standard deviation of the difference in distance as measured by physiologists and the app. Differences at 3 time points (start, month 3 and month 6) are lumped together in the calculation of the statistics (mean and standard deviation).

    Measured: At start, at month 3 and at month 6.

  2. Difference in Walked Distance Between 6MWT Test as Measured by Physiologists at the Clinic and App in Outdoor Mode at the Community

    Comparison of pairs of 6MWT distance estimates where one is the result of an observation done by a physiologist in a clinic (start, month 3 and month 6) and the other is measured by the app during an outdoor test performed within 7 days of the physiologist's observation. Measurements at 3 time points (start, month 3 and month 6) are lumped together in the calculation of the statistics (mean and standard deviation).

    Measured: Clinic tests at start, at month 3, at month 6. Community tests undertaken within 7 days of clinic test.

  3. Test-Retest Reliability of Community-Based 6MWT

    Intraclass correlation of app-base tests in outdoor mode in the community, measured over pairs of outdoor tests performed by the same patient no more than 7 days apart.

    Measured: 6MWT in the community, at the patient's discretion (recommended once/month), over 6 months

  4. Compliance to Monitoring Regime in the Community

    Percentage of patients who performed at least 1 app-based 6MWT in the community per month

    Measured: At month 6

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted18 Nov 2020
  2. Study start15 Jan 2018
  3. Primary completion28 Aug 2019
  4. Study completion1 Apr 2020

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
30 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04633538
Sponsor's protocol ID
PID13040
Acronym
6-APP
Status last verified
Feb 2025
First submitted
26 Aug 2020
Last updated
7 Mar 2025
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Publications

  • Agarwal R, Gomberg-Maitland M. Current therapeutics and practical management strategies for pulmonary arterial hypertension. Am Heart J. 2011 Aug;162(2):201-13. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2011.05.012. Epub 2011 Jul 13.

    PubMed 21835279
  • Galie N, Brundage BH, Ghofrani HA, Oudiz RJ, Simonneau G, Safdar Z, Shapiro S, White RJ, Chan M, Beardsworth A, Frumkin L, Barst RJ; Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension and Response to Tadalafil (PHIRST) Study Group. Tadalafil therapy for pulmonary arterial hypertension. Circulation. 2009 Jun 9;119(22):2894-903. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.839274. Epub 2009 May 26.

    PubMed 19470885
  • Tan MP, Bansal SK, Wynn NN, Umerov M, Gillham A, Henderson A, Hildreth A, Junejo S. Long term survival of patients with raised pulmonary arterial systolic pressure utilizing echocardiography-a five-year prospective study. J Geriatr Cardiol. 2012 Dec;9(4):328-35. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1263.2012.06191.

    PubMed 23341836
  • Gabler NB, French B, Strom BL, Palevsky HI, Taichman DB, Kawut SM, Halpern SD. Validation of 6-minute walk distance as a surrogate end point in pulmonary arterial hypertension trials. Circulation. 2012 Jul 17;126(3):349-56. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.105890. Epub 2012 Jun 13.

    PubMed 22696079
  • Mathai SC, Puhan MA, Lam D, Wise RA. The minimal important difference in the 6-minute walk test for patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2012 Sep 1;186(5):428-33. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201203-0480OC. Epub 2012 Jun 21.

    PubMed 22723290
  • Miyamoto S, Nagaya N, Satoh T, Kyotani S, Sakamaki F, Fujita M, Nakanishi N, Miyatake K. Clinical correlates and prognostic significance of six-minute walk test in patients with primary pulmonary hypertension. Comparison with cardiopulmonary exercise testing. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2000 Feb;161(2 Pt 1):487-92. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.161.2.9906015.

    PubMed 10673190
  • Barst RJ, Rubin LJ, Long WA, McGoon MD, Rich S, Badesch DB, Groves BM, Tapson VF, Bourge RC, Brundage BH, Koerner SK, Langleben D, Keller CA, Murali S, Uretsky BF, Clayton LM, Jobsis MM, Blackburn SD, Shortino D, Crow JW; Primary Pulmonary Hypertension Study Group. A comparison of continuous intravenous epoprostenol (prostacyclin) with conventional therapy for primary pulmonary hypertension. N Engl J Med. 1996 Feb 1;334(5):296-301. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199602013340504.

    PubMed 8532025
  • Salvi D, Poffley E, Tarassenko L, Orchard E. App-Based Versus Standard Six-Minute Walk Test in Pulmonary Hypertension: Mixed Methods Study. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Jun 7;9(6):e22748. doi: 10.2196/22748.

    PubMed 34096876

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Pulmonary Hypertension, run by Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust at 1 site in United Kingdom.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 Mar 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 7 Mar 2025). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Percentage of Participants Who Perform App-based Home 6MWT (time frame: 6 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04633538, which also lists 8 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 Mar 2025; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 7 Nov 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in