Arthroscopic Shoulder SurgeryECMNCT04633837
Examining the Effectiveness of a Connective Tissue Matrix Implant in Reducing Post-operative Pain and Narcotic After Outpatient Arthroscopic Shoulder Surgery
A study testing Extracellular Matrix Graft Injectable Implant in people with Arthroscopic Shoulder Surgery and Pain, Postoperative, run by Brian Badman at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
This document is a protocol for a human research study. This study is to be conducted according to United States standards of Good Clinical Practice in accordance with applicable Federal regulations and institutional research policies and procedures. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 55 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Arthroscopic Shoulder Surgery, Pain, Postoperative
- What is being tested?
- Extracellular Matrix Graft Injectable Implant
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion, Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 15 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 4 Dec 2020to 7 Nov 2021
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 55 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Age 18 and older
- Primary diagnosis of rotator cuff tear, labral tear or SLAP tear
- Able to provide informed consent
- Is willing and able to accept text messages
Who cannot join
- Older than 55 years old.
- Pregnancy.
- Known narcotic or alcohol abuse (< 3 months)
- Revision shoulder surgery
- Current narcotic regimen or contract with pain management specialist
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: A Prospective Double Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial Examining the Effectiveness of a Connective Tissue Matrix Implant in Reducing Post-operative Pain and Narcotic Use in Patients Under 55yo After Outpatient Arthroscopic Shoulder Surgery
This document is a protocol for a human research study. This study is to be conducted according to United States standards of Good Clinical Practice in accordance with applicable Federal regulations and institutional research policies and procedures.
Extracellular matrix grafts have been used to help with postoperative inflammation.
Read the detailed description
Shoulder surgery has evolved over the past decade with many procedures now done on an outpatient basis. Multimodal pain management strategies and regional anesthesia have greatly contributed to this transition and newer strategies continue to evolve. Uncontrolled pain can often lead to readmissions, prolonged hospital or ambulatory stays and an overall negative patient experience. Despite improvements in regional anesthetic technique and newer longer acting medicines such as liposomal bupivacaine, the duration of pain relief is often only over the course of 72 hours postoperatively. Post-operative pain beyond 72 hours is largely inflammatory in nature. As such, biologic approaches to reduce surgical tissue damage-induced inflammation is an attractive therapeutic addition to surgical procedures. These approaches are especially relevant in light of the current opioid epidemic plaguing the United States.
Flowable, placental-derived connective tissue matrix (pECM) is a potential option to supplement damaged tissue prone to inflammation as it introduces nascent, hydrated components of the inflammatory phase, including structural proteins and growth factors, which allow for efficient repair. Derived from relatively immune-privileged tissue, placental-derived pECM elicits little or no immune response in recipients. They have been shown to greatly reduce inflammatory cell influx and inflammatory cytokines present in dermal and mucosal surgical sites post-operatively. Moreover, placental-derived pECM reduces expression of prostaglandin E2, a potent pain mediator, in vitro. In the orthopedic space, ECM has been used effectively to reduce pain following spinal fusion and for treatment of knee arthritis. Taken together, biologic therapies directed at modulating inflammation and associated pain is an increasing area of interest with far reaching implications.
The purpose of the current study is to prospectively analyze two groups of patients treated for arthroscopic shoulder surgery with and without a flowable pECM to determine if a significant reduction in pain and opioid consumption as measured in morphine equivalent units is demonstrated within the first 6 weeks of surgery. Furthermore, patients will be compared in regard to early range of motion and patient reported outcomes to determine if a difference is present when the ECM is utilized within the first 6 months of surgery. This is the first double blinded prospective series in the shoulder literature to date looking at a pECM graft for pain reduction and improved range of motion perioperatively.
Study Objectives
Utilizing a prospective randomized controlled trial, the aim of this study is to assess modulation of post-operative pain and narcotic use when a placental-derived extracellular matrix is injected into the bed of the repair following outpatient arthroscopic shoulder surgery. Furthermore, this study aims to determine if the addition of pECM influences patient reported outcomes and influences early postoperative range of motion.
Primary Aims \& Objective
Aim 1a: To assess post-operative narcotic consumption (measured in morphine equivalent units) between patients treated with flowable placental-derived pECM compared to those patients undergoing arthroscopic shoulder surgery.
Hypothesis: Narcotic consumption (measured in morphine equivalent units) will be reduced in patients treated with an extracullar matrix graft as compared to those patients undergoing rotator cuff surgery without.
Objective: Utilizing a prospective randomized controlled trial, narcotic use will be measured for 24-hour increments for a total of 7 post-operative days (PODs) then once on POD 14, 21, 28, and 42. . Consumption will be measured by the number of tablets ingested and converted to morphine equivalent units and compared between the two treatment groups.
Aim 1b: To determine if flowable placental-derived pECM decreases patient-reported post-operative VAS pain in patients undergoing outpatient rotator cuff surgery
Hypothesis: There will be a decrease in VAS pain for up to 6 weeks post-operatively among participants who receive pECM, as compared to the control group (no pECM).
Objective: Utilizing a prospective randomized controlled trial, post-operative patient-reported VAS pain (on a scale of 0-10) will be collected 1 times per day (every 24 hours) for 7 post-operative days (PODs); then an average score collected on POD 14, POD 21, POD 28, and POD 42. Scores will be averaged and compared between the two treatment groups for the first 7 days, 2 week, 3rd week, 4th week and 6th week postoperatively.
Secondary Aims \& Objectives
Aim 2a: To assess patient-reported outcomes and early range of motion (measured in morphine equivalents) in patients treated with flowable placental-derived pECM compared to patients injected with saline control.
Hypothesis: There will be improved patient reported outcomes and early range of motion measured at 6 weeks and 3 months and 6 months postoperatively in patients receiving and extracellular matrix injection following outpatient arthroscopic shoulder surgery.
Objective: Utilizing a prospective randomized controlled trial, patient reported outcomes as measured by American Shoulder and Elbow Score, Simple Shoulder Test and SANE scores and range of motion (External rotation, internal rotation and forward flexion) will be collected preoperatively and at 2 weeks (external rotation), 6 weeks (all)) , 3 months (all) and 6 months (all) postoperatively. Scores and range of motion measurements will be averaged and compared for differences between the two groups.
Study Design
The study design is a randomized double-blind randomized controlled trial.
Research Design
Patients will be randomly assigned to one of two treatment groups (see Intervention Description). Patients will randomly select one of 70 sealed envelopes the day of surgery. Patients will be blinded to the medication utilized as well as the treating surgeon (PI). A consecutive series of patients will be enrolled to prevent selection bias. A single surgeon will be performing all procedures to minimize variability. Upon completion of the surgery, a spinal needle will be loaded into the substance of the rotator cuff tendon under direct arthroscopic visualization. The surgeon will then leave the room and the envelope will be opened by the circulating operating room nurse. If the patient is in the treatment group, 2cc of an extracellular matrix graft be opened and then injected with a 22g spinal needle already placed into the bed of the repair by the physician assistant. Those patients that are in the control group will have the needle removed and no injection administered. The envelope will be then sealed with the patient's name and treatment group to allow for data analysis upon completion of the study.
Data Collection will occur post-operatively for 6 months. Data will be collected at 13 timepoints, in total for pain and opioid consumption. For the first seven days, data will be collected at 24-hour time intervals beginning the first morning after the surgery (POD1) at 8am then at 24-hour intervals for the next 7 days (POD7). Data will be collected using Oberd, an application that uses text message or email to collect information. The morning after the surgery (POD0) the first email will occur at 8am. Patients will then be notified by email alert 1 times per day (8am) asking to rate their pain on a scale of 0-10 (VAS) beginning on POD 1 thru POD 7. Patients will also respond to the number of pain pills taken in the slotted time span. All patients will be prescribed the same narcotic regimen (oxycodone IR) barring any allergies encountered. Patients who fail to respond to the email alert will be notified by the data collection system and contacted via phone by study personnel. Patients lacking smartphone technology will all be notified via telephone and also asked to keep a personal log to capture the information needed.
- Conditions
- Arthroscopic Shoulder Surgery, Pain, Postoperative
- Being tested
- Extracellular Matrix Graft Injectable Implant
- Keywords
- extracellular matrix implant
- Medical subject headings
- Pain, Postoperative
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Extracellular Matrix Graft Injectable ImplantDevice
Also called CTM graft
The extracellular matrix injectable implant will serve as the intervention in this study.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Group 1 Control | No intervention | Group 1 will undergo standard arthroscopic shoulder surgery without the ECM injection. |
| Group 2: ECM Injectable graft | Active comparator | Group 2 will undergo arthroscopic shoulder surgery and receive 2cc of the injectable extracellular matrix injection placed into the glenohumeral joint space via a transtendon approach at the end of the surgery Receives: Device: Extracellular Matrix Graft Injectable Implant |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Patient Reported Post Operative Opioid Use
Utilizing a prospective randomized controlled trial, narcotic use will be measured for 24-hour increments for a total of 7 post-operative days (PODs) then once on POD 14, 21, 28, and 42. Consumption will be measured by the number of tablets ingested and converted to morphine equivalent units and compared between the two treatment groups
Measured: Up till 6 weeks
Patient Reported Postoperative Pain: Visual Analogue Pain
Utilizing a prospective randomized controlled trial, post-operative patient-reported VAS pain (on a scale of 0-10) will be collected 1 time per day (every 24 hours) for 7 post-operative days (PODs); then an average score collected on POD 14, POD 21, POD 28, and POD 42. Scores will be averaged and compared between the two treatment groups for the first 7 days, 2 week, 3rd week, 4th week and 6th week postoperatively. A score of zero will indicate no pain and a score of 10 will indicated maximum pain.
Measured: Up till 6 weeks
Secondary outcomes (1)
American Shoulder and Elbow Scores
To determine if there is a difference in American Shoulder and Elbow scores of patients with rotator cuff tears treated with and without the the ECM implant measured at 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months and 6 months postoperatively. The scoring system is from 0 to a maximum of 100 with the higher scores indicating better outcomes.
Measured: Up till 6 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted18 Nov 2020
- Study start4 Dec 2020
- Primary completion7 Nov 2021
- Study completion7 Nov 2021
Why it stopped: Left employment with job and study site
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (3)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Arthroscopic Shoulder SurgeryStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- The extracellular matrix implant injection is the intervention in this study. One group of patients undergoing arthroscopic shoulder surgery will receive 2cc of the injectable implant placed into the glenohumeral joint space at completion of the rotator cuff repair and the other group will not.
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 15 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Brian Badman
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- CTM Biomedical
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, Brian Badman, Indiana University
- Investigators
- brian l badman, MD, Principal investigator, American Health Network
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04633837
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 1294348
- Acronym
- ECM
- Status last verified
- Dec 2021
- First submitted
- 1 Nov 2020
- Last updated
- 6 Jan 2022
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Colvin AC, Egorova N, Harrison AK, Moskowitz A, Flatow EL. National trends in rotator cuff repair. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012 Feb 1;94(3):227-33. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.J.00739.
PubMed 22298054Duellman TJ, Gaffigan C, Milbrandt JC, Allan DG. Multi-modal, pre-emptive analgesia decreases the length of hospital stay following total joint arthroplasty. Orthopedics. 2009 Mar;32(3):167.
PubMed 19309064Parvataneni HK, Shah VP, Howard H, Cole N, Ranawat AS, Ranawat CS. Controlling pain after total hip and knee arthroplasty using a multimodal protocol with local periarticular injections: a prospective randomized study. J Arthroplasty. 2007 Sep;22(6 Suppl 2):33-8. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2007.03.034. Epub 2007 Jul 26.
PubMed 17823012
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 6 Jan 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Prospective Double Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial Examining the Effectiveness of a Connective Tissue Matrix Implant in Reducing Post-operative Pain and Narcotic Use in Patients Under 55yo After Outpatient Arthroscopic Shoulder Surgery
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04633837
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ECM / 1294348
- Conditions
- Arthroscopic Shoulder Surgery, Pain, Postoperative
- Keywords
- extracellular matrix implant
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: Left employment with job and study site
- Enrolment
- 15 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Brian BadmanUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- CTM Biomedical
- Study start
- 4 Dec 2020 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 7 Nov 2021 (actual)
- Study completion
- 7 Nov 2021 (actual)
- First posted
- 18 Nov 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 6 Jan 2022
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This document is a protocol for a human research study. This study is to be conducted according to United States standards of Good Clinical Practice in accordance with applicable Federal regulations and institutional research policies and procedures.
Extracellular matrix grafts have been used to help with postoperative inflammation.
Detailed description
Shoulder surgery has evolved over the past decade with many procedures now done on an outpatient basis. Multimodal pain management strategies and regional anesthesia have greatly contributed to this transition and newer strategies continue to evolve. Uncontrolled pain can often lead to readmissions, prolonged hospital or ambulatory stays and an overall negative patient experience. Despite improvements in regional anesthetic technique and newer longer acting medicines such as liposomal bupivacaine, the duration of pain relief is often only over the course of 72 hours postoperatively. Post-operative pain beyond 72 hours is largely inflammatory in nature. As such, biologic approaches to reduce surgical tissue damage-induced inflammation is an attractive therapeutic addition to surgical procedures. These approaches are especially relevant in light of the current opioid epidemic plaguing the United States.
Flowable, placental-derived connective tissue matrix (pECM) is a potential option to supplement damaged tissue prone to inflammation as it introduces nascent, hydrated components of the inflammatory phase, including structural proteins and growth factors, which allow for efficient repair. Derived from relatively immune-privileged tissue, placental-derived pECM elicits little or no immune response in recipients. They have been shown to greatly reduce inflammatory cell influx and inflammatory cytokines present in dermal and mucosal surgical sites post-operatively. Moreover, placental-derived pECM reduces expression of prostaglandin E2, a potent pain mediator, in vitro. In the orthopedic space, ECM has been used effectively to reduce pain following spinal fusion and for treatment of knee arthritis. Taken together, biologic therapies directed at modulating inflammation and associated pain is an increasing area of interest with far reaching implications.
The purpose of the current study is to prospectively analyze two groups of patients treated for arthroscopic shoulder surgery with and without a flowable pECM to determine if a significant reduction in pain and opioid consumption as measured in morphine equivalent units is demonstrated within the first 6 weeks of surgery. Furthermore, patients will be compared in regard to early range of motion and patient reported outcomes to determine if a difference is present when the ECM is utilized within the first 6 months of surgery. This is the first double blinded prospective series in the shoulder literature to date looking at a pECM graft for pain reduction and improved range of motion perioperatively.
Study Objectives
Utilizing a prospective randomized controlled trial, the aim of this study is to assess modulation of post-operative pain and narcotic use when a placental-derived extracellular matrix is injected into the bed of the repair following outpatient arthroscopic shoulder surgery. Furthermore, this study aims to determine if the addition of pECM influences patient reported outcomes and influences early postoperative range of motion.
Primary Aims \& Objective
Aim 1a: To assess post-operative narcotic consumption (measured in morphine equivalent units) between patients treated with flowable placental-derived pECM compared to those patients undergoing arthroscopic shoulder surgery.
Hypothesis: Narcotic consumption (measured in morphine equivalent units) will be reduced in patients treated with an extracullar matrix graft as compared to those patients undergoing rotator cuff surgery without.
Objective: Utilizing a prospective randomized controlled trial, narcotic use will be measured for 24-hour increments for a total of 7 post-operative days (PODs) then once on POD 14, 21, 28, and 42. . Consumption will be measured by the number of tablets ingested and converted to morphine equivalent units and compared between the two treatment groups.
Aim 1b: To determine if flowable placental-derived pECM decreases patient-reported post-operative VAS pain in patients undergoing outpatient rotator cuff surgery
Hypothesis: There will be a decrease in VAS pain for up to 6 weeks post-operatively among participants who receive pECM, as compared to the control group (no pECM).
Objective: Utilizing a prospective randomized controlled trial, post-operative patient-reported VAS pain (on a scale of 0-10) will be collected 1 times per day (every 24 hours) for 7 post-operative days (PODs); then an average score collected on POD 14, POD 21, POD 28, and POD 42. Scores will be averaged and compared between the two treatment groups for the first 7 days, 2 week, 3rd week, 4th week and 6th week postoperatively.
Secondary Aims \& Objectives
Aim 2a: To assess patient-reported outcomes and early range of motion (measured in morphine equivalents) in patients treated with flowable placental-derived pECM compared to patients injected with saline control.
Hypothesis: There will be improved patient reported outcomes and early range of motion measured at 6 weeks and 3 months and 6 months postoperatively in patients receiving and extracellular matrix injection following outpatient arthroscopic shoulder surgery.
Objective: Utilizing a prospective randomized controlled trial, patient reported outcomes as measured by American Shoulder and Elbow Score, Simple Shoulder Test and SANE scores and range of motion (External rotation, internal rotation and forward flexion) will be collected preoperatively and at 2 weeks (external rotation), 6 weeks (all)) , 3 months (all) and 6 months (all) postoperatively. Scores and range of motion measurements will be averaged and compared for differences between the two groups.
Study Design
The study design is a randomized double-blind randomized controlled trial.
Research Design
Patients will be randomly assigned to one of two treatment groups (see Intervention Description). Patients will randomly select one of 70 sealed envelopes the day of surgery. Patients will be blinded to the medication utilized as well as the treating surgeon (PI). A consecutive series of patients will be enrolled to prevent selection bias. A single surgeon will be performing all procedures to minimize variability. Upon completion of the surgery, a spinal needle will be loaded into the substance of the rotator cuff tendon under direct arthroscopic visualization. The surgeon will then leave the room and the envelope will be opened by the circulating operating room nurse. If the patient is in the treatment group, 2cc of an extracellular matrix graft be opened and then injected with a 22g spinal needle already placed into the bed of the repair by the physician assistant. Those patients that are in the control group will have the needle removed and no injection administered. The envelope will be then sealed with the patient's name and treatment group to allow for data analysis upon completion of the study.
Data Collection will occur post-operatively for 6 months. Data will be collected at 13 timepoints, in total for pain and opioid consumption. For the first seven days, data will be collected at 24-hour time intervals beginning the first morning after the surgery (POD1) at 8am then at 24-hour intervals for the next 7 days (POD7). Data will be collected using Oberd, an application that uses text message or email to collect information. The morning after the surgery (POD0) the first email will occur at 8am. Patients will then be notified by email alert 1 times per day (8am) asking to rate their pain on a scale of 0-10 (VAS) beginning on POD 1 thru POD 7. Patients will also respond to the number of pain pills taken in the slotted time span. All patients will be prescribed the same narcotic regimen (oxycodone IR) barring any allergies encountered. Patients who fail to respond to the email alert will be notified by the data collection system and contacted via phone by study personnel. Patients lacking smartphone technology will all be notified via telephone and also asked to keep a personal log to capture the information needed.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, care provider, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- The extracellular matrix implant injection is the intervention in this study. One group of patients undergoing arthroscopic shoulder surgery will receive 2cc of the injectable implant placed into the glenohumeral joint space at completion of the rotator cuff repair and the other group will not.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Group 1 Control | No intervention | –Group 1 will undergo standard arthroscopic shoulder surgery without the ECM injection. |
| Group 2: ECM Injectable graft | Active comparator | Device: Extracellular Matrix Graft Injectable ImplantGroup 2 will undergo arthroscopic shoulder surgery and receive 2cc of the injectable extracellular matrix injection placed into the glenohumeral joint space via a transtendon approach at the end of the surgery |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 55 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Age 18 and older
- Primary diagnosis of rotator cuff tear, labral tear or SLAP tear
- Able to provide informed consent
- Is willing and able to accept text messages
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Older than 55 years old.
- Pregnancy.
- Known narcotic or alcohol abuse (< 3 months)
- Revision shoulder surgery
- Current narcotic regimen or contract with pain management specialist
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Extracellular Matrix Graft Injectable ImplantAlso: CTM graftThe extracellular matrix injectable implant will serve as the intervention in this study. | Device | Group 2: ECM Injectable graft |
Primary outcome
Patient Reported Post Operative Opioid Use
Time frame: Up till 6 weeks
Utilizing a prospective randomized controlled trial, narcotic use will be measured for 24-hour increments for a total of 7 post-operative days (PODs) then once on POD 14, 21, 28, and 42. Consumption will be measured by the number of tablets ingested and converted to morphine equivalent units and compared between the two treatment groups
Patient Reported Postoperative Pain: Visual Analogue Pain
Time frame: Up till 6 weeks
Utilizing a prospective randomized controlled trial, post-operative patient-reported VAS pain (on a scale of 0-10) will be collected 1 time per day (every 24 hours) for 7 post-operative days (PODs); then an average score collected on POD 14, POD 21, POD 28, and POD 42. Scores will be averaged and compared between the two treatment groups for the first 7 days, 2 week, 3rd week, 4th week and 6th week postoperatively. A score of zero will indicate no pain and a score of 10 will indicated maximum pain.
1 secondary outcome
American Shoulder and Elbow Scores
Time frame: Up till 6 months
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 6 Jan 2022.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Background: PubMed 22298054Colvin AC, Egorova N, Harrison AK, Moskowitz A, Flatow EL. National trends in rotator cuff repair. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012 Feb 1;94(3):227-33. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.J.00739.
- Background: PubMed 19309064Duellman TJ, Gaffigan C, Milbrandt JC, Allan DG. Multi-modal, pre-emptive analgesia decreases the length of hospital stay following total joint arthroplasty. Orthopedics. 2009 Mar;32(3):167.
- Background: PubMed 17823012Parvataneni HK, Shah VP, Howard H, Cole N, Ranawat AS, Ranawat CS. Controlling pain after total hip and knee arthroplasty using a multimodal protocol with local periarticular injections: a prospective randomized study. J Arthroplasty. 2007 Sep;22(6 Suppl 2):33-8. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2007.03.034. Epub 2007 Jul 26.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Arthroscopic Shoulder Surgery
RecruitingObservational study
SPSIP Block in Shoulder Artroscopy
Shoulder Arthroscopic Surgeries
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
Exparel and Dexamethasone
Postoperative Pain, Shoulder Arthroscopic Surgeries
Recruiting
The Effect of Nutritional Education on Post-Arthroscopic Nutritional Status
Arthroscopic Surgery, Nutrition
Not yet recruiting
Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Infraspinatus-Teres Minor Interfascial Plane Block for Analgesia After Shoulder Arthroscopy
Shoulder Arthroscopic Surgery
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
Intravenous Dexamethasone Added to Dexmedetomidine After Superior Trunk Block
Postoperative Pain, Arthroscopic Shoulder Surgery
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
brian l badman, MD principal investigator
American Health Network
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Extracellular Matrix Graft Injectable Implant in people with Arthroscopic Shoulder Surgery and Pain, Postoperative, run by Brian Badman at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Jan 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 6 Jan 2022). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Patient Reported Post Operative Opioid Use (time frame: Up till 6 weeks). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04633837, which also lists 3 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Jan 2022; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 7 Nov 2026.