Aortic Valve StenosisNCT04639258
Medtronic Evolut™ EXPAND TAVR I Feasibility Study
A study testing Medtronic Evolut™ PRO+ System in people with Aortic Valve Stenosis, run by Medtronic Cardiovascular at 8 sites in 5 countries.
Trial summary
The purpose of the study is to obtain safety and effectiveness data of the Medtronic Evolut™ PRO+ TAVR System for the treatment of severe, asymptomatic aortic stenosis. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 65 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Aortic Valve Stenosis
- What is being tested?
- Medtronic Evolut™ PRO+ System
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 11 participants
- Where
- 8 sitesin 5 countries
- Study dates
- 28 May 2021to 7 Jun 2022
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 65 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Severe aortic stenosis, defined as: Aortic valve area ≤ 1.0 cm^2, or aortic valve area index ≤ 0.6 cm^2/m^2, and mean gradient ≥ 40 mmHg or Vmax ≥ 4.0 m/sec
- Subject denies symptoms attributable to aortic stenosis, including but not limited to:
- Dyspnea on rest or exertion
- Angina
- Syncope in the absence of another identifiable cause
- Fatigue
- Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) >50%
Who cannot join
- Age <65 years
- Class I indication for cardiac surgery
- Bicuspid, unicuspid, or quadricuspid aortic valve
- In need of and suitable for coronary revascularization
Trial locations and contacts
8 sites in 5 countries.
8 sites in 5 countries
United States4 sites
Northwell Health
Manhasset, New York, 11030-3816
Aurora Saint Luke's Medical Center
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 53215
Los Robles Hospital & Medical Center
Thousand Oaks, California, 91360
UPMC Pinnacle Harrisburg Campus
Wormleysburg, Pennsylvania, 17043
About this study
The purpose of the study is to obtain safety and effectiveness data of the Medtronic Evolut™ PRO+ TAVR System for the treatment of severe, asymptomatic aortic stenosis.
Read the detailed description
Single-arm, descriptive, multi-center, international
All subjects will be treated with a Medtronic Evolut™ PRO+ TAVR System. Subject follow-ups will be conducted at pre and post-procedure, discharge, 30 days, 6 months, and annually through 5 years.
- Conditions
- Aortic Valve Stenosis
- Being tested
- Medtronic Evolut™ PRO+ System
- Medical subject headings
- Aortic Valve Stenosis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Medtronic Evolut™ PRO+ SystemDevice
TAVR treatment with Medtronic Evolut™ PRO+ System
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Medtronic Evolut™ PRO+ System | Experimental | All study subjects will be treated with the Medtronic Evolut™ PRO+ TAVR System. Receives: Device: Medtronic Evolut™ PRO+ System |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
All-cause and Cardiovascular Mortality
Rate of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality
Measured: 30 days
All-cause and Cardiovascular Mortality
Rate of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality
Measured: 6 months
All Stroke (Disabling and Non-disabling)
Rate of disabling and non-disabling stroke
Measured: 30 days
All Stroke (Disabling and Non-disabling)
Rate of disabling and non-disabling stroke
Measured: 6 months
Myocardial Infarction (Periprocedural and Spontaneous)
Rate of periprocedural and spontaneous myocardial infarction
Measured: 30 days
Myocardial Infarction (Periprocedural and Spontaneous)
Rate of periprocedural and spontaneous myocardial infarction
Measured: 6 months
Acute Kidney Injury
Rate of acute kidney injury
Measured: 30 days
Acute Kidney Injury
Rate of acute kidney injury
Measured: 6 months
Major Vascular Complications
Rate of major vascular complications
Measured: 30 days
Major Vascular Complications
Rate of major vascular complications
Measured: 6 months
Life-threatening Bleed
Rate of life-threatening (or disabling) bleed
Measured: 30 days
Life-threatening Bleed
Rate of life-threatening (or disabling) bleed
Measured: 6 months
New Permanent Pacemaker Implantation (PPI)
Rate of new permanent pacemaker implantation (excludes patients with pre-existing pacemakers at baseline)
Measured: 30 days
New Permanent Pacemaker Implantation (PPI)
Rate of new permanent pacemaker implantation (excludes patients with pre-existing pacemakers at baseline)
Measured: 6 months
New Intraventricular Conduction Delays
Rate of new intraventricular conduction delays (excludes patients with intraventricular conduction delays at baseline)
Measured: 30 days
New Intraventricular Conduction Delays
Rate of new intraventricular conduction delays (excludes patients with intraventricular conduction delays at baseline)
Measured: 6 months
New-onset Atrial Fibrillation
Rate of new-onset atrial fibrillation (excludes patients with atrial fibrillation at baseline)
Measured: 30 days
New-onset Atrial Fibrillation
Rate of new-onset atrial fibrillation (excludes patients with atrial fibrillation at baseline)
Measured: 6 months
Valve-related Dysfunction Requiring Repeat Procedure
Rate of valve-related dysfunction requiring repeat procedure
Measured: 30 days
Valve-related Dysfunction Requiring Repeat Procedure
Rate of valve-related dysfunction requiring repeat procedure
Measured: 6 months
Device Success (VARC-2)
The VARC-2 definition of device success is absence of procedural mortality, correct positioning of a single prosthetic heart valve into the proper anatomical location, intended performance of the prosthetic heart valve, defined as the absence of patient-prosthesis-mismatch and mean aortic valve gradient less than 20 mmHg (or peak velocity <3 m/sec), and absence of moderate or severe prosthetic valve regurgitation
Measured: Discharge (12 hours to 7 days post-procedure)
Cardiovascular and Heart Failure Hospitalizations
Rate of cardiovascular and heart failure hospitalizations
Measured: 30 days
Cardiovascular and Heart Failure Hospitalizations
Rate of cardiovascular and heart failure hospitalizations
Measured: 6 months
Heart Failure Events
Rate of heart failure events
Measured: 30 days
Heart Failure Events
Rate of heart failure events
Measured: 6 months
Hemodynamic Performance Metrics (Mean Aortic Gradient) by Doppler Echocardiography
Reporting of prosthetic valve hemodynamic performance by transvalvular mean aortic gradient
Measured: Discharge (12 hours to 7 days post-procedure)
Hemodynamic Performance Metrics (Mean Aortic Gradient) by Doppler Echocardiography
Reporting of prosthetic valve hemodynamic performance by transvalvular mean aortic gradient
Measured: 30 days
Hemodynamic Performance Metrics (Mean Aortic Gradient) by Doppler Echocardiography
Reporting of prosthetic valve hemodynamic performance by transvalvular mean aortic gradient
Measured: 6 months
Hemodynamic Performance Metrics (Effective Orifice Area) by Doppler Echocardiography
Change in hemodynamic performance metrics by Doppler echocardiography measured by effective orifice area.
Measured: Discharge (12 hours to 7 days post-procedure)
Hemodynamic Performance Metrics (Effective Orifice Area) by Doppler Echocardiography
Change in hemodynamic performance metrics by Doppler echocardiography measured by effective orifice area.
Measured: 30 days
Hemodynamic Performance Metrics (Effective Orifice Area) by Doppler Echocardiography
Change in hemodynamic performance metrics by Doppler echocardiography measured by effective orifice area.
Measured: 6 months
Hemodynamic Performance Metrics (Degree of Total, Para, and Transvalvular Prosthetic Regurgitation) by Doppler Echocardiography
Reporting of prosthetic valve hemodynamic performance by degree of total, para, and transvalvular regurgitation by Doppler echocardiography
Measured: Discharge (12 hours to 7 days post-procedure)
Hemodynamic Performance Metrics (Degree of Total, Para, and Transvalvular Prosthetic Regurgitation) by Doppler Echocardiography
Reporting of prosthetic valve hemodynamic performance by degree of total, para, and transvalvular regurgitation by Doppler echocardiography
Measured: 30 days
Hemodynamic Performance Metrics (Degree of Total, Para, and Transvalvular Prosthetic Regurgitation) by Doppler Echocardiography
Reporting of prosthetic valve hemodynamic performance by degree of total, para, and transvalvular regurgitation by Doppler echocardiography
Measured: 6 months
Hemodynamic Performance Metrics (Incidence of Moderate and Severe Patient-prosthesis Mismatch) by Doppler Echocardiography
Reporting of prosthetic valve hemodynamic performance by incidence of moderate and severe patient-prosthesis mismatch by Doppler echocardiography
Measured: Discharge (12 hours to 7 days post-procedure)
Hemodynamic Performance Metrics (Incidence of Moderate and Severe Patient-prosthesis Mismatch) by Doppler Echocardiography
Reporting of prosthetic valve hemodynamic performance by incidence of moderate and severe patient-prosthesis mismatch by Doppler echocardiography
Measured: 30 days
Hemodynamic Performance Metrics (Incidence of Moderate and Severe Patient-prosthesis Mismatch) by Doppler Echocardiography
Reporting of prosthetic valve hemodynamic performance by incidence of moderate and severe patient-prosthesis mismatch by Doppler echocardiography
Measured: 6 months
Change From Baseline in New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Classification
Reporting of NYHA classification change from baseline to 30 days and 6 months
NYHA Classification criteria:
Class I: Subjects with cardiac disease but without resulting limitations of physical activity.
Class I: Subjects with cardiac disease resulting in slight limitation of physical activity.
Class III: Subjects with cardiac disease resulting in marked limitation of physical activity.
Class IV: Subjects with cardiac disease resulting in inability to carry on any physical activity without discomfort.
Measured: 30 days and 6 months
Change From Baseline in Six-minute Walk Test (6MWT)
Reporting change from baseline in distance walked during 6MWT
Measured: 6 months
Change From Baseline in Health-related Quality of Life (QoL) as Assessed by Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ)
KCCQ quantifies physical function, symptoms, social function, self-efficiency, knowledge, and quality of life. Scores are transformed to a range of 0-100, in which higher scores reflect better health status.
Measured: 30 days and 6 months
Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF)
Reporting of change in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) from baseline by echocardiography
Measured: 6 months
Change From Baseline in Global Longitudinal Strain (GLS)
Reporting of change in GLS from baseline by echocardiography
Measured: 6 months
Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Filling Pressure (E:e')
Reporting of change in left ventricular filling pressure (E:e') from baseline by echocardiography
Measured: 6 months
Change From Baseline in Stroke Volume Index (SVI)
Reporting of change in stroke volume index (SVI) from baseline by echocardiography
Measured: 6 months
Change From Baseline in NT-pro B-type Natriuretic Peptide (NT-proBNP)
Reporting of change in NT-pro B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) from baseline
Measured: 6 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted20 Nov 2020
- Study start28 May 2021
- Primary completion7 Jun 2022
- Study completion7 Jun 2022
Why it stopped: Reevaluation of clinical strategy in this patient population led to a business decision to discontinue the study. Discontinuation is not due to any patient safety, patient welfare, or quality issues.
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Aortic Valve StenosisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Medtronic CardiovascularThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 11 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Medtronic Cardiovascular
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Paul Sorajja, MD, Principal investigator, Allina Health SystemJosep Rodes-Cabau, MD, Principal investigator, Fondation IUCPQ
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04639258
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- D00266108
- Status last verified
- Jan 2024
- First submitted
- 5 Nov 2020
- Last updated
- 10 Jan 2024
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 10 Jan 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Medtronic Evolut™ EXPAND TAVR I Feasibility Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04639258
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- D00266108
- Conditions
- Aortic Valve Stenosis
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: Reevaluation of clinical strategy in this patient population led to a business decision to discontinue the study. Discontinuation is not due to any patient safety, patient welfare, or quality issues.
- Enrolment
- 11 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Medtronic CardiovascularIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 28 May 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 7 Jun 2022 (actual)
- Study completion
- 7 Jun 2022 (actual)
- First posted
- 20 Nov 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 10 Jan 2024
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of the study is to obtain safety and effectiveness data of the Medtronic Evolut™ PRO+ TAVR System for the treatment of severe, asymptomatic aortic stenosis.
Detailed description
Single-arm, descriptive, multi-center, international
All subjects will be treated with a Medtronic Evolut™ PRO+ TAVR System. Subject follow-ups will be conducted at pre and post-procedure, discharge, 30 days, 6 months, and annually through 5 years.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Medtronic Evolut™ PRO+ System | Experimental | Device: Medtronic Evolut™ PRO+ SystemAll study subjects will be treated with the Medtronic Evolut™ PRO+ TAVR System. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 65 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Severe aortic stenosis, defined as: Aortic valve area ≤ 1.0 cm^2, or aortic valve area index ≤ 0.6 cm^2/m^2, and mean gradient ≥ 40 mmHg or Vmax ≥ 4.0 m/sec
- Subject denies symptoms attributable to aortic stenosis, including but not limited to:
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Age <65 years
- Class I indication for cardiac surgery
- Bicuspid, unicuspid, or quadricuspid aortic valve
- In need of and suitable for coronary revascularization
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Medtronic Evolut™ PRO+ SystemTAVR treatment with Medtronic Evolut™ PRO+ System | Device | Medtronic Evolut™ PRO+ System |
Primary outcome
All-cause and Cardiovascular Mortality
Time frame: 30 days
Rate of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality
All-cause and Cardiovascular Mortality
Time frame: 6 months
Rate of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality
All Stroke (Disabling and Non-disabling)
Time frame: 30 days
Rate of disabling and non-disabling stroke
All Stroke (Disabling and Non-disabling)
Time frame: 6 months
Rate of disabling and non-disabling stroke
Myocardial Infarction (Periprocedural and Spontaneous)
Time frame: 30 days
Rate of periprocedural and spontaneous myocardial infarction
Myocardial Infarction (Periprocedural and Spontaneous)
Time frame: 6 months
Rate of periprocedural and spontaneous myocardial infarction
Acute Kidney Injury
Time frame: 30 days
Rate of acute kidney injury
Acute Kidney Injury
Time frame: 6 months
Rate of acute kidney injury
Major Vascular Complications
Time frame: 30 days
Rate of major vascular complications
Major Vascular Complications
Time frame: 6 months
Rate of major vascular complications
Life-threatening Bleed
Time frame: 30 days
Rate of life-threatening (or disabling) bleed
Life-threatening Bleed
Time frame: 6 months
Rate of life-threatening (or disabling) bleed
New Permanent Pacemaker Implantation (PPI)
Time frame: 30 days
Rate of new permanent pacemaker implantation (excludes patients with pre-existing pacemakers at baseline)
New Permanent Pacemaker Implantation (PPI)
Time frame: 6 months
Rate of new permanent pacemaker implantation (excludes patients with pre-existing pacemakers at baseline)
New Intraventricular Conduction Delays
Time frame: 30 days
Rate of new intraventricular conduction delays (excludes patients with intraventricular conduction delays at baseline)
New Intraventricular Conduction Delays
Time frame: 6 months
Rate of new intraventricular conduction delays (excludes patients with intraventricular conduction delays at baseline)
New-onset Atrial Fibrillation
Time frame: 30 days
Rate of new-onset atrial fibrillation (excludes patients with atrial fibrillation at baseline)
New-onset Atrial Fibrillation
Time frame: 6 months
Rate of new-onset atrial fibrillation (excludes patients with atrial fibrillation at baseline)
Valve-related Dysfunction Requiring Repeat Procedure
Time frame: 30 days
Rate of valve-related dysfunction requiring repeat procedure
Valve-related Dysfunction Requiring Repeat Procedure
Time frame: 6 months
Rate of valve-related dysfunction requiring repeat procedure
Device Success (VARC-2)
Time frame: Discharge (12 hours to 7 days post-procedure)
The VARC-2 definition of device success is absence of procedural mortality, correct positioning of a single prosthetic heart valve into the proper anatomical location, intended performance of the prosthetic heart valve, defined as the absence of patient-prosthesis-mismatch and mean aortic valve gradient less than 20 mmHg (or peak velocity <3 m/sec), and absence of moderate or severe prosthetic valve regurgitation
Cardiovascular and Heart Failure Hospitalizations
Time frame: 30 days
Rate of cardiovascular and heart failure hospitalizations
Cardiovascular and Heart Failure Hospitalizations
Time frame: 6 months
Rate of cardiovascular and heart failure hospitalizations
Heart Failure Events
Time frame: 30 days
Rate of heart failure events
Heart Failure Events
Time frame: 6 months
Rate of heart failure events
Hemodynamic Performance Metrics (Mean Aortic Gradient) by Doppler Echocardiography
Time frame: Discharge (12 hours to 7 days post-procedure)
Reporting of prosthetic valve hemodynamic performance by transvalvular mean aortic gradient
Hemodynamic Performance Metrics (Mean Aortic Gradient) by Doppler Echocardiography
Time frame: 30 days
Reporting of prosthetic valve hemodynamic performance by transvalvular mean aortic gradient
Hemodynamic Performance Metrics (Mean Aortic Gradient) by Doppler Echocardiography
Time frame: 6 months
Reporting of prosthetic valve hemodynamic performance by transvalvular mean aortic gradient
Hemodynamic Performance Metrics (Effective Orifice Area) by Doppler Echocardiography
Time frame: Discharge (12 hours to 7 days post-procedure)
Change in hemodynamic performance metrics by Doppler echocardiography measured by effective orifice area.
Hemodynamic Performance Metrics (Effective Orifice Area) by Doppler Echocardiography
Time frame: 30 days
Change in hemodynamic performance metrics by Doppler echocardiography measured by effective orifice area.
Hemodynamic Performance Metrics (Effective Orifice Area) by Doppler Echocardiography
Time frame: 6 months
Change in hemodynamic performance metrics by Doppler echocardiography measured by effective orifice area.
Hemodynamic Performance Metrics (Degree of Total, Para, and Transvalvular Prosthetic Regurgitation) by Doppler Echocardiography
Time frame: Discharge (12 hours to 7 days post-procedure)
Reporting of prosthetic valve hemodynamic performance by degree of total, para, and transvalvular regurgitation by Doppler echocardiography
Hemodynamic Performance Metrics (Degree of Total, Para, and Transvalvular Prosthetic Regurgitation) by Doppler Echocardiography
Time frame: 30 days
Reporting of prosthetic valve hemodynamic performance by degree of total, para, and transvalvular regurgitation by Doppler echocardiography
Hemodynamic Performance Metrics (Degree of Total, Para, and Transvalvular Prosthetic Regurgitation) by Doppler Echocardiography
Time frame: 6 months
Reporting of prosthetic valve hemodynamic performance by degree of total, para, and transvalvular regurgitation by Doppler echocardiography
Hemodynamic Performance Metrics (Incidence of Moderate and Severe Patient-prosthesis Mismatch) by Doppler Echocardiography
Time frame: Discharge (12 hours to 7 days post-procedure)
Reporting of prosthetic valve hemodynamic performance by incidence of moderate and severe patient-prosthesis mismatch by Doppler echocardiography
Hemodynamic Performance Metrics (Incidence of Moderate and Severe Patient-prosthesis Mismatch) by Doppler Echocardiography
Time frame: 30 days
Reporting of prosthetic valve hemodynamic performance by incidence of moderate and severe patient-prosthesis mismatch by Doppler echocardiography
Hemodynamic Performance Metrics (Incidence of Moderate and Severe Patient-prosthesis Mismatch) by Doppler Echocardiography
Time frame: 6 months
Reporting of prosthetic valve hemodynamic performance by incidence of moderate and severe patient-prosthesis mismatch by Doppler echocardiography
Change From Baseline in New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Classification
Time frame: 30 days and 6 months
Reporting of NYHA classification change from baseline to 30 days and 6 months NYHA Classification criteria: Class I: Subjects with cardiac disease but without resulting limitations of physical activity. Class I: Subjects with cardiac disease resulting in slight limitation of physical activity. Class III: Subjects with cardiac disease resulting in marked limitation of physical activity. Class IV: Subjects with cardiac disease resulting in inability to carry on any physical activity without discomfort.
Change From Baseline in Six-minute Walk Test (6MWT)
Time frame: 6 months
Reporting change from baseline in distance walked during 6MWT
Change From Baseline in Health-related Quality of Life (QoL) as Assessed by Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ)
Time frame: 30 days and 6 months
KCCQ quantifies physical function, symptoms, social function, self-efficiency, knowledge, and quality of life. Scores are transformed to a range of 0-100, in which higher scores reflect better health status.
Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF)
Time frame: 6 months
Reporting of change in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) from baseline by echocardiography
Change From Baseline in Global Longitudinal Strain (GLS)
Time frame: 6 months
Reporting of change in GLS from baseline by echocardiography
Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Filling Pressure (E:e')
Time frame: 6 months
Reporting of change in left ventricular filling pressure (E:e') from baseline by echocardiography
Change From Baseline in Stroke Volume Index (SVI)
Time frame: 6 months
Reporting of change in stroke volume index (SVI) from baseline by echocardiography
Change From Baseline in NT-pro B-type Natriuretic Peptide (NT-proBNP)
Time frame: 6 months
Reporting of change in NT-pro B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) from baseline
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 10 Jan 2024.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
Related trials for Aortic Valve Stenosis
Active, not recruiting
Comparison of the Balloon-Expandable Edwards Valve and Self-Expandable CoreValve Evolut R or Evolut PRO System for the Treatment of Small, Severely Dysfunctional Surgical Aortic Bioprotheses. The 'LYTEN' Trial
Aortic Valve Stenosis, Regurgitation, Aortic
Not yet recruiting
NHLBI SESAME (SEptal Scoring Along Midline Endocardium) Multi-Center Prospective Study Using Improvised Off-Label Devices
Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy, Left Ventricular Outflow Obstruction
Not yet recruiting
Human Experimental Models of Pain (HEMP)
Acute Pain
Recruiting
Exercise and Diet Supplements for Older Patients Undergoing TAVI: the IRON-TAVI Trial
Aortic Stenosis Disease, Aortic Stenosis Symptomatic
Recruiting
Systematic Ambulatory ECG Monitoring Following TAVI
Aortic Stenosis, Conduction Disturbances
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Paul Sorajja, MD principal investigator
Allina Health System
Josep Rodes-Cabau, MD principal investigator
Fondation IUCPQ
8 sites in 5 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Medtronic Evolut™ PRO+ System in people with Aortic Valve Stenosis, run by Medtronic Cardiovascular at 8 sites in 5 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Jan 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 8 sites in United States, Australia, Canada, Israel, New Zealand. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 10 Jan 2024). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
All-cause and Cardiovascular Mortality (time frame: 30 days). The study lists 45 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Jan 2024.