AzTrials
AzTrials

Marfan SyndromeNCT04641325

Marfan Syndrome Moderate Exercise Pilot

A study testing Exercise Intervention Group in people with Marfan Syndrome, run by Baylor College of Medicine at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Marfan syndrome (MFS) affects multiple organ systems including the heart, bones, ligaments, and eyes, and is associated with significant risk of aortic dissection. Given limited evidence from in-vitro studies, and theoretical concerns, the majority of patients with MFS are restricted from certain physical activities. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 12 to 21 years
Conditions the study is for
Marfan Syndrome
What is being tested?
Exercise Intervention Group
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
23 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
9 Nov 2020to 20 Dec 2022
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 12 to 21 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Must be between the ages of 12-21
  • Diagnosis of Marfan Syndrome
  • Must not have other conditions that limit the patients ability to perform exercise

Who cannot join

  • Patients who have undergone aortic surgery
  • Patients with major congenital heart disease

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Texas Children's Hospital

    Houston, Texas, 77030

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Evaluating the Effects of Moderate Physical Activity on Health and Well-being in Adolescents and Young Adults With Marfan Syndrome

Marfan syndrome (MFS) affects multiple organ systems including the heart, bones, ligaments, and eyes, and is associated with significant risk of aortic dissection. Given limited evidence from in-vitro studies, and theoretical concerns, the majority of patients with MFS are restricted from certain physical activities. The lack of exercise and deconditioning have detrimental effects including increasing weakness, joint pain, decreased endurance, and depressive symptoms. Given the significant paucity of data currently existing on the effects of exercise in humans with MFS, and the recent, optimistic findings in rodent models, this pilot trial was established to assess the effects of moderated dynamic exercise in adolescents and young adults with MFS.

Read the detailed description

Marfan syndrome (MFS) affects multiple organ systems including the heart, bones, ligaments, and eyes, and is associated with significant risk of aortic dissection. Given anecdotal reports of aortic dissection, limited evidence from in-vitro studies, and theoretical concerns, the majority of patients with MFS are restricted from certain physical activities, most commonly isometric exercise and contact sports. Published guidelines also suggest restriction from highly dynamic competitive sports. While clinicians may mean to restrict patients only from competitive sports, often children and families interpret this caution as applying to almost all exercise, resulting in a large number of patients with Marfan syndrome being sedentary. This lack of exercise and deconditioning likely have detrimental effects in increasing weakness and joint pain and decreasing endurance. Depressive symptoms are also not uncommon in Marfan syndrome, and may be triggered or exacerbated by guidance to acutely cease participation in sports at the time of diagnosis.

To date, as far as the investigators are aware, there are no published controlled studies on the effects of dynamic exercise on human subjects. In 2017, Mas-Stachurska et al published a study suggesting that a moderate level of dynamic exercise mitigated progressive degradation of the cardiac structures typically seen in Marfan Syndrome in a rodent sample. This study suggests the possibility that the fears surrounding moderate exercise in humans may be unwarranted. In addition, this study suggests that moderate exercise may actually protect the aorta and myocardium, in addition to the numerous other physical and emotional benefits that have been shown to result from consistent exercise. The overall goal is to evaluate the effects of a moderate dynamic exercise program on measures of cardiovascular, muscular, and mental health in adolescents and young adults with Marfan syndrome. The investigators plan to perform a randomized pilot study to calculate effect estimates to perform a larger multi-center study. The objective is to 1) randomize 20 patients with Marfan syndrome age 12-21 years to current status (controls) versus a moderate dynamic exercise intervention, then 2) allow the control group patients to undergo the exercise intervention. The investigators will then compare outcomes between both the intervention and control groups, and between the baseline and post-intervention states. Specific outcome measures will include cardiovascular assessment: maximal oxygen uptake (max VO2), segmental and central aortic stiffness, ventricular mass and volume, and endothelial function, muscular/physical assessment: manual muscle testing (MMT), functional balance, and pain assessment, and quality of life/mental health assessment: health-related quality of life, depression and anxiety screening scales. The hypothesis is that the intervention of a moderate exercise program introduced by a licensed physical therapist will result in improvement in cardiovascular status, muscular health, and mental health without detrimental effects on the aortic wall.

Conditions
Marfan Syndrome
Being tested
Exercise Intervention Group
Keywords
Cardiovascular, Moderate Exercise, Physical Therapy
Medical subject headings
Marfan Syndrome

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Exercise Intervention GroupOther

    Patients will be educated on methods of self-evaluating exertion and cardiovascular effort by assessing respiratory rate and perceived exertion. Next, patients will be given options for cardiovascular activities and complete at a moderate level of activity for a minimum of 150 minutes per week. Patients will perform a combination of exercises under the supervision of a physical therapist until a mod intensity level is reached and sustained. Patients will be taught to use the activity tracker to record their heart rate, activity, and PES. Patients will have a phone call every week to assess status, answer questions, and provide guidance on progressing intensity or duration of exercise. At the end of 8 weeks all patients will return for re-assessment.

Study groups in NCT04641325
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Exercise Intervention GroupExperimentalGroup of up to 20 patients will receive all of the preliminary outcome measure testing (cardiovascular, musculoskeletal, and psychological screening) in addition to exercise intervention education, demonstration, and follow up to ensure compliance and safety.
Receives: Other: Exercise Intervention Group

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Maximum VO2

    Maximum VO2 in ml/kg/minute will be collected via Exercise Stress Test. Range 30-85, higher is better.

    Measured: 4 months

Secondary outcomes (27)
  1. Mean systolic blood pressure

    mmHg, range 70-200, both low and high are abnormal, goal is age, sex and height-based, goal 10-50 percentile

    Measured: 4 months

  2. Mean Diastolic blood pressure

    mmHg, range 20-150, both low and high are abnormal, goal is age, sex and height-based, goal 10-50 percentile

    Measured: 4 months

  3. Mean pulse pressure

    mmHg, systolic blood pressure minus diastolic blood pressure, range 30-70 mmHg, goal is normal range for age and sex

    Measured: 4 months

  4. Weight

    kg, range 50-300kg, lower is better, excluding underweight patients

    Measured: 4 months

  5. BMI

    kg/m2, lower is better generally, excluding pts with BMI <5% for age

    Measured: 4 months

  6. Left ventricular strain by cardiac MRI

    Continuous measure derived from post-processing MRI

    Measured: 4 months

  7. Right ventricular strain by cardiac MRI

    Continuous measure derived from post-processing MRI

    Measured: 4 months

  8. Aortic root strain

    Continuous measure %, higher is less stiff, Range 0-40

    Measured: 4 months

  9. Aortic Root Distensibility

    ×10-3 mm Hg-1, Continuous measure, range 0.1-10

    Measured: 4 months

  10. Aortic Root β-Stiffness index

    No units, Range 0.1-90

    Measured: 4 months

  11. Maximum aortic root dimension

    Measured in cm, range 1-8cm

    Measured: 4 months

  12. Aortic root z-score

    No units, based on body surface area published references, range -3 to 25

    Measured: 4 months

  13. Aortic pulse wave velocity from MRI

    meters/second, range 0-30

    Measured: 4 months

  14. Pulse wave velocity derived from applanation tonometry

    meters/second, range 0-30

    Measured: 4 months

  15. Augmentation index

    %, range 1-90

    Measured: 4 months

  16. Manual muscle testing score

    Grade 0-5, higher is better

    Measured: 4 months

  17. Reactive hyperemia index

    no units, 0-4 range, higher is worse

    Measured: 4 months

  18. Visual analog assessment of pain

    no units, scale from 0-6, 6 is worse

    Measured: 4 months

  19. Single Leg Stance Test

    seconds, higher is better

    Measured: 4 months

  20. Single limb squat test score

    seconds, higher is better

    Measured: 4 months

  21. Star Excursion Balance Test

    %, range 0-100, higher is better

    Measured: 4 months

  22. 6M Timed Hop Test

    milliseconds, range 1 to infinity, lower is better

    Measured: 4 months

  23. Scale for Child Anxiety Related Emotional Disorders (SCARED) (ages 12-18 y)

    41 item scale, each with 3 point Likert scale, scale is summed, range 0-123, higher is worse

    Measured: 4 months

  24. Quality of Life Scale (QOLS) (ages 19-21 y)

    16 items, each with 7 point Likert, higher is worse

    Measured: 4 months

  25. Pediatric Quality of Life Scale (PedsQL) scale scores

    reported in 3 domains, each reported on Likert scale, scaled to 0-100 scale, lower is worse

    Measured: 4 months

  26. Children's Depression Inventory (CDI) 2 (ages 12-18 y)

    28-item assessment that yields a Total Score, 2 scale scores, and 4 subscale scores. For each item, respondent is presented with 3 choices that correspond to 3 levels of symptomatology: 0 (absence of symptoms), 1 (mild or probable symptom), or 2 (definite symptom). Lower is better

    Measured: 4 months

  27. Depression, Anxiety, & Stress Scale (DASS) (ages 19-21 y)

    set of 3 self-report scales. Each scale contains 14 items, each with a 4-point severity/frequency scale, higher is worse

    Measured: 4 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted23 Nov 2020
  2. Study start9 Nov 2020
  3. Primary completion30 Oct 2022
  4. Study completion20 Dec 2022

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Model description
The first part of trial was a Randomized Controlled Step-Wedge Pilot Trial as below 2 groups (Exercise Intervention Group and Current Care Group) The first phase of the study will maintain the Current Care Group as the control. At the end of the first phase, the Current Care Group will crossover and receive the Exercise Intervention as the second phase of the trial. With the COVID-19 pandemic causing delays in the study, and decreased enrollment and decreased access to MRI, the study was altered to a single group. comparing the same outcomes at baseline and after the intervention. This eliminates the blinding of the PI, but those interpreting the tests are still blinded.
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
23 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04641325
Sponsor's protocol ID
H-45475
Status last verified
Aug 2023
First submitted
23 Apr 2020
Last updated
14 Aug 2023
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Exercise Intervention Group in people with Marfan Syndrome, run by Baylor College of Medicine at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 Aug 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Maximum VO2 (time frame: 4 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 Aug 2023; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 29 Oct 2026.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in