AzTrials
AzTrials

Bone FractureNCT04643912

Vibration as a Method of Fracture Screening in Children

A study testing Vibration Device in people with Bone Fracture, run by Sheffield Children's NHS Foundation Trust at 1 site in United Kingdom.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

When assessing an injured child, doctors must decide whether or not there is an underlying bone fracture. The best way of doing this is to take an x-ray. In 2011, the 46,000 children attending Sheffield Children's Hospital Emergency Department had 10,400 x-rays mainly to help diagnose fractures. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 10 to 15 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Bone Fracture
What is being tested?
Vibration Device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
100 participants
Where
1 siteUnited Kingdom
Study dates
7 Oct 2016to 6 Jan 2020
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 10 to 15 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Child

Who may be able to join

None listed.

Who cannot join

  • Age 9 years and 364 days or less. Age 16 years or more
  • Injury sustained more than 24 hours before attendance
  • Informed consent withheld
  • Distressed child or family (most children will receive pain relief in the Emergency Department prior to having their radiographs and vibration analysis)
  • Both arms or both legs thought to be fractured (the non-fractured contralateral limb will act as control for each child)
  • Inability to access bony prominence
Show all 16Show fewer
  • Presence of metal work (e.g. internal or external fixators), plaster of Paris or other cast
  • Previously recorded fracture or orthopaedic surgery (this might affect vibration spectra).
  • Healthy Controls We have previously obtained a letter of support from the Deputy Head of King Edward's VII Language College, Sheffield, to recruit 20 healthy children and perform vibration analysis at a convenient time (11.00am to 1.00pm on Saturdays). We have so far recruited 15 healthy children and will seek permission from the Head/Deputy Head to extend the original 20 to 50.
  • Age 9 years and 364 days or less. Age 16 years or more
  • Previous fracture to any wrist or ankle
  • Previous surgery to any wrist or ankle
  • Known chronic disease (any long-term disease on-going for over one year)
  • Informed consent withheld
  • Inability to access bony prominence
  • Presence of metal work (e.g. internal or external fixators), plaster of Paris or other cast, limb prosthesis

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United Kingdom1 site
  • Sheffield Children's NHS Foundation Trust

    Sheffield, Sheffield (South Yorkshire District), S10 2TH

Other trials in United Kingdom

About this study

Official title: Bone Vibration as a Novel Screening Tool for Long Bone Fractures in Children

When assessing an injured child, doctors must decide whether or not there is an underlying bone fracture. The best way of doing this is to take an x-ray.

In 2011, the 46,000 children attending Sheffield Children's Hospital Emergency Department had 10,400 x-rays mainly to help diagnose fractures. Taking just the foot and wrist, 2,215 x-rays were normal with no fracture, at a cost of £119,610 for the Sheffield community alone (at tariff £54 per x-ray). This works out as a cost of approximately £12 million per year across England and Wales. Additionally, although the radiation dose is quite small, given that x-rays can cause cancer, no radiation is better than some radiation.

Read more

A fracture screening method is needed that will help doctors, schoolteachers and others more reliably decide which children should have an x-ray.

Vibration is reliably used in industry to find defects such as cracks in machines and other structures. The researchers believe that vibration can similarly find fractures in bones in children. The team has recently demonstrated the ability of vibration to correctly pick the 3 x-ray confirmed cases out of 13 adults who had a wrist fracture (7 healthy adults and 6 with wrist injury). None of the 6 injured adults felt that vibration would be too painful to use on injured children.

The proposal is now to compare the vibration patterns of the bones of about 150 children over 10 years of age attending the researchers' Emergency Department with their fracture positive or fracture negative x-rays. The researchers also propose to assess any differences in the vibration patterns between left and right wrist and ankles in 50 healthy school children with no injury.

Should vibration analysis for fracture screening prove sufficiently accurate, further larger studies shall be conducted, with the aim of developing an instrument that will reduce the number of injured children having unnecessary x-rays. On completion of this study, the plan is to extend the study to include younger children.

This will lead to cost savings for the NHS and less inconvenience for patients and their families, with shorter stays in Emergency Departments and reduced population exposure to harmful ionising radiation.

Read the detailed description

The main research question underpinning this pilot study is, "Can vibration spectra reliably distinguish fractured from non-fractured bones in children?"

The Problem:

A significant number of unnecessary radiographs are performed to exclude the presence of fractures. In 2011, 46,000 children attended Sheffield Children's Hospital Emergency Department (ED), for whom 10,400 radiographs were performed. 2,215 foot/ankle and wrist radiographs alone proved unnecessary. This translates to a potential cost saving of £119,610/year in Sheffield and approximately £12M/year in England and Wales.

Clearly there is the need for a non-invasive, portable, cheap and rapid method of screening long bones for fractures to establish the probability of whether the bone is fracture negative or positive; those with a high probability of fracture then going on to be radiographed, to establish presence, type and position of fracture.

A Possible Solution:

Vibration analysis involves the mechanical excitation of an object, then recording and analysing the subsequent responses . When a structure is allowed to move freely after an excitation, it will vibrate at its specific natural frequencies where the inertial forces are in balance with the elastic forces, depending upon the stiffness of that structure.

Vibration spectral analysis is reliably used in industry to detect cracks in machinery.

The researchers tested the hypothesis that fractured and non-fractured bones return different vibration spectra on 13 adults; 7 healthy volunteers from the Engineering Department of Sheffield Hallam University and 6 patients following injury at Northern General Hospital, 3 of whom had fractures , with 100% correlation of vibration spectra with presence/absence of fracture and no pain.

Given these encouraging results, the proposal is to extend the study to children.

Research Theory:

The researchers postulate that there are detectable differences in the natural vibration frequencies obtained from bones with and without fracture. Each child's uninjured contralateral bone will serve as a comparison for the injured side.

The application of vibration analysis involves mechanical excitation of an object and recording and analysing the subsequent responses. In theory, by applying a stimulus to the bone and analysing the resulting response, it is possible to monitor various pathological and trauma-induced conditions.

Vibrations may be induced either by an impulse, which yields a response consistent with the inputting of a number of independent fundamental frequencies, or by variable frequency cycles of pure sine waves.

Having induced the vibrations by a small purpose-built computer-controlled tapper, the commonest method of recording them uses piezoelectric gauges on bony prominences (minimising the effect of underlying soft tissue). For example, when analysing tibial fracture healing, the lateral or medial malleolus are prime sites . Successful operation of piezoelectric gauges depends on the coupling of the gauge to the structure under investigation, such that the induced stresses produce a net change in charge of the transducer terminals due to the piezoelectric effect.

Piezoelectric crystals are relatively inexpensive and their properties well understood. Both piezoresistive and piezoelectric materials are commonly used to detect strain caused by vibrations in macro-scale structures. However, they often require challenging signal processing and interpretation. The research group has experience working with complex medical signals (e.g. electroencephalograms) to extract relevant information and will bring this experience to bear in this project.

Previous feasibility studies provide a sound basis for the proposed study. There is extensive information on theory, techniques for vibration analysis of physical structures are well established and furthermore, a number of studies have explored low-frequency vibration analysis as a possible diagnostic tool in the orthopaedic field. For example, in one study it was reported that the vibration transmission across a fracture is affected by the stages of healing of the fracture callus.

As far as the researchers are aware, no study has used the precise methodology proposed in this current study to screen for fractures in children.

Conditions
Bone Fracture
Being tested
Vibration Device
Keywords
Medical device, Vibration
Medical subject headings
Fractures, Bone

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Vibration DeviceDiagnostic test

    Device which causes the bone to vibrate and records the spectrum of that vibration

Study groups in NCT04643912
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Injured wrist or ankleExperimentalChild with trauma needing wrist or ankle x-ray: Will receive vibration analysis blinded to x-ray findings.
Receives: Diagnostic Test: Vibration Device

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Diagnostic accuracy of vibration analysis for detecting wrist and ankle fractures

    Number of patients correctly stratified by vibration analysis into fracture and non-fracture groups (reference standard = wrist/ankle radiographs)

    Measured: 4 years

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted25 Nov 2020
  2. Study start7 Oct 2016
  3. Primary completion28 May 2017
  4. Study completion6 Jan 2020

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Diagnosis
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Model description
Measuring the effectiveness of vibration fracture analysis against standard radiographs.
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
100 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04643912
Sponsor's protocol ID
SCH/13/053b
Status last verified
Sep 2022
First submitted
3 Nov 2020
Last updated
13 Sep 2022
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Vibration Device in people with Bone Fracture, run by Sheffield Children's NHS Foundation Trust at 1 site in United Kingdom.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 0 inclusion and 16 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Sep 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Diagnostic accuracy of vibration analysis for detecting wrist and ankle fractures (time frame: 4 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Sep 2022.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in