AzTrials
AzTrials

Cystic FibrosisUBD-IRMNCT04644471

Comparison Between Ultra-low-dose Computed Tomography and Lung MRI in Cystic Fibrosis

A study testing CT scanner and Lung MRI in people with Cystic Fibrosis, run by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris at 1 site in France.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the performances of ultra-low dose computed tomography (CT) and lung magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for morphological assessment of cystic fibrosis-related lung disease and to compare their performances to conventional low dose CT Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Cystic Fibrosis
What is being tested?
CT scanner and Lung MRI
How many people
185 participants
Where
1 siteFrance
Study dates
5 Aug 2021to 25 Jul 2024
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age ≥ 18 year-old
  • Diagnosis of cystic fibrosis provided by genetic and swear test
  • Chest CT acquisition performed as part of the standard follow-up
  • Patient with social security or health insurance
  • Informed consent

Who cannot join

  • MRI contraindication
  • Orthopnea
  • Inability to hold breath for 17 seconds
  • No spirometry planned the same day
  • Lung transplant patient

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

France1 site
  • Cochin hospital

    Paris, 75014

Other trials in France

About this study

Official title: Comparison Between Ultra-low-dose Computed Tomography and Lung MRI for Morphological Assessment of Lung Disease in Adult Cystic Fibrosis Patients

The purpose of this study is to compare the performances of ultra-low dose computed tomography (CT) and lung magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for morphological assessment of cystic fibrosis-related lung disease and to compare their performances to conventional low dose CT

Read the detailed description

Cystic fibrosis (CF) is a recessive autosomal disease caused by mutations in the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) gene that encodes for an epithelial chloride channel involved in ion and fluid transport. CF is the most common inherited disease in Caucasians and disease severity mainly depends on the degree of lung involvement, which can lead to terminal respiratory failure Disease monitoring of CF-related lung disease rely on functional assessment and complimentary morphological assessment. Conventional low-dose chest computed tomography (CT) is currently the gold standard for the morphological assessment of CF-related lung disease but ultra-low dose chest CT and high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the lung using UTE sequences have been recently developed and allow important radiation reduction of radiation dose exposure. However the performances of these 2 competing imaging methods remains to be compared.

Conditions
Cystic Fibrosis
Being tested
CT scanner, Lung MRI
Keywords
Magnetic resonance imaging, Multidetector computed tomography
Medical subject headings
Cystic Fibrosis

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • CT scannerDiagnostic test

    1 conventional low dose inspiratory acquisition and 1 ultra-low-dose inspiratory acquisition

  • Lung MRIDiagnostic test

    3 UTE sequences (free breathing, inspiratory and expiratory) and 1 T2 sequence

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Reproducibility of visual score between imaging modalities

    Reproducibility disease severity measured by the Helbich scoring system with conventional CT as gold standard

    Measured: 1 day

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Intra and interobserver reproducibility of visual scores

    Intra and interobserver reproducibility of the Helbich score for each imaging modality

    Measured: 1 day

  2. Correlation between visual scores and pulmonary function

    Correlation between the Helbich score for each imaging modality and forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1)

    Measured: 1 day

  3. Correlation between air trapping at MRI and pulmonary function test

    Correlation between air trapping, measured by comparing inspiratory to expiratory MRI images, and forced expiratory volume at one second (FEV1)

    Measured: 1 day

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted25 Nov 2020
  2. Study start5 Aug 2021
  3. Primary completion25 Jul 2024
  4. Study completion25 Jul 2024

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Diagnosis
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
185 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04644471
Sponsor's protocol ID
APHP190061
Other IDs
2019-A02078-49
Acronym
UBD-IRM
Status last verified
Feb 2026
First submitted
5 Oct 2020
Last updated
13 Feb 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Dournes G, Grodzki D, Macey J, Girodet PO, Fayon M, Chateil JF, Montaudon M, Berger P, Laurent F. Quiet Submillimeter MR Imaging of the Lung Is Feasible with a PETRA Sequence at 1.5 T. Radiology. 2015 Jul;276(1):258-65. doi: 10.1148/radiol.15141655. Epub 2015 Mar 13.

    PubMed 25768672
  • Dournes G, Menut F, Macey J, Fayon M, Chateil JF, Salel M, Corneloup O, Montaudon M, Berger P, Laurent F. Lung morphology assessment of cystic fibrosis using MRI with ultra-short echo time at submillimeter spatial resolution. Eur Radiol. 2016 Nov;26(11):3811-3820. doi: 10.1007/s00330-016-4218-5. Epub 2016 Feb 2.

    PubMed 26843010
  • Chassagnon G, Martin C, Ben Hassen W, Freche G, Bennani S, Morel B, Revel MP. High-resolution lung MRI with Ultrashort-TE: 1.5 or 3 Tesla? Magn Reson Imaging. 2019 Sep;61:97-103. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2019.04.015. Epub 2019 Apr 30.

    PubMed 31051201
  • Chassagnon G, Martin C, Marini R, Vakalopolou M, Regent A, Mouthon L, Paragios N, Revel MP. Use of Elastic Registration in Pulmonary MRI for the Assessment of Pulmonary Fibrosis in Patients with Systemic Sclerosis. Radiology. 2019 May;291(2):487-492. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2019182099. Epub 2019 Mar 5.

    PubMed 30835186

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing CT scanner and Lung MRI in people with Cystic Fibrosis, run by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris at 1 site in France.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Feb 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Reproducibility of visual score between imaging modalities (time frame: 1 day). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04644471, which also lists 4 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Feb 2026.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in