Hepatocellular InjuryHOPE-NMPNCT04644744
Hypothermic Oxygenated (HOPE) Versus Normothermic Machine Perfusion (NMP) in Human Liver Transplantation
A study testing Hypothermic oxygenated perfusion (HOPE) and Normothermic machine perfusion (NMP) in people with Hepatocellular Injury and Liver Transplant Disorder, run by Charite University, Berlin, Germany at 4 sites in Germany.
Trial summary
The common practice of conventional cold storage (CCS) organ preservation has changed little since the initial introduction of the original University of Wisconsin (UW) organ preservation solution in the late 1980s. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Hepatocellular Injury, Liver Transplant Disorder
- What is being tested?
- Hypothermic oxygenated perfusion (HOPE) and Normothermic machine perfusion (NMP)
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 213 participants
- Where
- 4 sitesGermany
- Study dates
- 14 Jan 2021to Dec 2024
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Signed informed consent
- Patients 18 years or older
- Patients suffering from end stage-liver disease and/or malignant liver tumours
- Listed for OLT
- Receiving ECD-allografts
Who cannot join
- Recipients of split or living donor liver transplants
- Previous liver transplantation
- Combined transplantations (liver-kidney, liver-lung, etc.)
- Participation in other liver related trials
- The subject received an investigational drug within 30 days prior to inclusion
- The subject is unwilling or unable to follow the procedures outlined in the protocol
Show all 9Show fewer
- The subject is mentally or legally incapacitated
- Patient is not able to understand the procedures due to language barriers
- Family members of the investigators or employees of the participating departments
Trial locations and contacts
4 sites in 1 country.
Germany4 sites, 4 recruiting
- Recruiting
Charité Universitätsmedizin - Berlin, Campus Charité Mitte | Campus Virchow-Klinikum
Berlin, 13353
Georg Lurje, M.D., +4930450652339, georg.lurje@charite.de
Johann Pratschke, M.D., johann.pratschke@charite.de
- Recruiting
University Hospital Bonn, Department of Surgery
Bonn, 53127
Steffen Manekeller, MD, steffen.manekeller@ukbonn.de
- Not yet recruiting
Medizinische Hochschule Hannover (MHH), Department of Surgery and Transplantation
Hanover, 30625
Florian Vondran, M.D., Vondran.Florian@mh-hannover.de
- Not yet recruiting
University Hospital Heidelberg, Department of Surgery and Transplantation
Heidelberg, 69120
Arianeb Mehrabi, M.D., arianeb.mehrabi@med.uni-heidelberg.de
About this study
Official title: End-ischemic Hypothermic Oxygenated (HOPE) vs. Normothermic Machine Perfusion (NMP) Compared to Conventional Cold Storage in Donation After Brain Death Liver Transplantation; a Prospective Multicentre Randomized Controlled Trial (HOPE-NMP)
The common practice of conventional cold storage (CCS) organ preservation has changed little since the initial introduction of the original University of Wisconsin (UW) organ preservation solution in the late 1980s. CCS relies on hypothermia to decelerate metabolism and reduce oxygen demand in order to prolong the time of ischemia without rapid functional graft impairment, therefore merely delaying graft damage. While CCS only prolongs storage time and limits the damage sustained during the period of cold ischemia, ex-vivo machine perfusion (MP) appears to be capable of reversing some of these effects. Currently, two main paradigms prevail in the clinical approach to liver allograft MP: hypothermic oxygenated MP (HOPE) may be seen as a dynamic alternative of the traditional organ preservation based on hypothermia-induced deceleration of metabolism, which aims to combine the positive effects of hypothermia observed in classical cold storage (e.g. technical simplicity, relative safety, decreased metabolism) with the positive effects of dynamic preservation (e.g. controlled sheer stress mediated gene activation, removal of metabolites, transport of oxygen and ATP recharging). Normothermic perfusion (NMP) aims at re-equilibration of cellular metabolism by preserving the organ at physiological temperatures whilst ensuring sufficient oxygen and nutrient supply. In both approaches, the perpetual circulation and moderate shear-stress sustain endothelial functionality. While past and current clinical trials were designed to compare different MP approaches with CCS as the clinical standard, a direct comparison between different end-ischemic MP techniques (HOPE versus NMP) is still lacking. The purpose of this study is to test the effects of end-ischemic NMP versus end-ischemic HOPE technique in a multicentre prospective randomized controlled clinical trial (RCT) on ECD liver grafts in DBD liver-transplantation (HOPE-NMP). Two-hundred-thirteen (n = 213) human whole organ liver grafts will be submitted to either 4-24 hours of NMP (n = 85) or 2-3 hours of HOPE (n = 85) directly before implantation and going to be compared to a control-group of patients (n = 43) transplanted with static cold storage preserved ECD-allografts. Primary (surgical complications as assessed by the comprehensive complication index [CCI]) and secondary (among others laboratory values, graft- and patient survival, hospital costs, hospital stay) endpoints are going to be analysed.)
Read the detailed description
Liver transplantation has evolved as the mainstay of treatment for end-stage liver disease. While the demand for organ transplantation has increased over time, Germany's organ donation rate is low compared to other countries. The main indications for listing are 'fibrosis and cirrhosis' (27%) followed by 'alcoholic liver disease' (23%) and 'hepatic malignancies' (17%).
With the advent of emerging waiting list mortality, several strategies for donor pool expansion are being pursued; these include the use of living donors, splitting of cadaveric livers for two recipients, and the use of extended criteria donor (ECD) allografts for OLT. These ECD-allografts, however, exhibit poor tolerance to ischemia-reperfusion (I/R) injury, an important cause of liver damage. As such, I/R-injury is the underlying cause of graft dysfunction in ECD-allografts and negatively affects the process of liver regeneration in surgical conditions including hepatic resections and OLT.
Machine perfusion with oxygenated blood was already implemented in the first series of 11 successful human OLTs in the 1960s. While the logistical simplicity and reliable performance of CCS led to its quick adoption as the standard solid organ preservation technique, the increased utilization of high-risk organs has unveiled the limitations of CCS, furthering the debate on the impact of different MP techniques. Today, perfusion conditions vary broadly, especially in preclinical research. Parameters under discussion include different temperatures, perfusate composition, the application of perfusion flow (continuous or pulsatile), the timing and duration of the perfusion, starting either at the donor site or applied only end-ischemic in the recipient centre. Two main principles have been translated into clinical practice today: hypothermic oxygenated perfusion (HOPE) and normothermic MP (NMP). The latter differs significantly from HOPE because the allograft is perfused with oxygenated red blood cells or oxygen carriers at physiological temperatures with the aim to reduce the ischemic graft injury by minimizing the duration of cold preservation and perfectly mimicking physiological conditions. A recently completed randomized controlled trial (RCT) by Nasralla et al. proved the feasibility of NMP for OLT and demonstrated a significant reduction in peak AST and subsequent early allograft dysfunction (EAD), however without a significant difference in graft and patient survival. Most recently, a development of the NMP technique that allowed a 7-day preservation of human livers with a sustained metabolic function and an intact liver structure was recently reported by Eshmuminov et al. Based on the sustained full hepatic metabolism during NMP, several groups are currently exploring the possibility of normothermic viability testing. The cellular mechanisms of organ protection by NMP do not center around IRI mitigation and reconditioning, but IRI prevention, and are altogether different from cold perfusion techniques. While normothermic machine perfusion is most effective when applied during the entire period of organ preservation, the end-ischemic application of this technique in the recipient hospital is becoming more popular.
There are two main hypotheses on the underlying mechanisms of HOPE induced organ protection; (I.) modulation of cellular metabolism (energy household, mitochondrial respiration), and (II.) stimulation of the sinusoidal endothelial layer. Although, tissue oxygen consumption is markedly decreased at 4-10 Celsius, it is not completely suspended. The shift of mitochondrial metabolism to anaerobic pathways leads to expressed mitochondrial metabolite accumulation during ischemia and subsequently to extreme radical oxygen species (ROS) generation through rapid re-oxidization by the early reperfusion respiratory burst. The delivery of oxygen during cold preservation can effectively upload cellular energy household via various mitochondrial pathways. Pre-implantation resuscitation of organs with machine perfusion and oxygen can increase tissue ATP levels and decrease the post-ischemic production of ROS and danger-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs), this subsequently leads to a mitigated immune response. This organ conditioning effect is attributed to a controlled re-oxygenation inducing moderate ROS release just before reperfusion. These low levels of ROS are not only responsible for the induction of antioxidant enzymes (heme-oxygenase, gluthathione-synthase, superoxide-dismutase), but are also responsible for the stimulation of protein mediators of innate pro-survival mechanisms. A further mechanism behind the protective effects of dynamic preservation approaches is the presence of shear stress and as such active perfusion during the preservation phase may induce specific shear stress-sensitive genes some of which include Kruppel-like factor 2 or endothelial nitric oxide synthase. Currently, three multicenter RCTs have completed their patient recruitment and clinical results are expected for the year 2021. The Zurich group initiated a multicentric RCT to assess the impact of HOPE on any DBD liver graft including retransplantations and marginal livers and is powered to assess major complications (Clavien grade ≥III) (NCT01317342). The Groningen team explores the dual HOPE (d-HOPE) technique in DCD grafts (NCT02584283) and our own group initiated a multicentric RCT on HOPE in ECD-DBD liver transplantation in 2017 (NCT03124641).
Viability assessment during MP can guide the clinical decision whether to accept a liver for transplantation and is therefore an important emerging tool in ECD OLT. The possibility of a reliable viability assessment is advocated as a considerable advantage of normothermic perfusion techniques. By sustaining full metabolism, NMP allows to analyse several makers of liver function and injury, including biliary parameters (e.g. bile flow, bile glucose, bicarbonate and pH), perfusate pH and base excess, portal venous- and hepatic artery flow and perfusate hepatocellular enzymes. Despite the reduced metabolic activity during cold storage and hypothermic liver perfusion, there is increasing evidence that a prediction of future graft performance after transplantation may be possible during HOPE, as well. Analysis of the cold perfusate during HOPE provides a unique opportunity to identity potential biomarkers which are associated with various post-OLT outcomes. A recent study involving 31 human ECD-DBD grafts initially rejected for transplantation, found that cold perfusion not only ameliorates reperfusion injury but also allows for graft viability assessment. Thus, the 2-hour perfusate AST and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) correlated significantly with the peak AST after implantation. In two grafts with a significant postreperfusion transaminase release, a high portal perfusion pressure was noted.
The Zurich group has recently presented a new mitochondrial marker to assess viability of entire liver grafts during HOPE. Real-time fluorometric analysis of mitochondrial flavin mononucleotide (FMN) in the HOPE perfusate predicted human liver function, complications and graft loss prior to transplantation. The use of this surrogate parameter could facilitate proper clinical decision making whether to accept or decline allografts in the HOPE setting. This marker is currently validated in other solid organs and also in the RCT of Guarerras working group. Importantly, the quantification of FMN is possible in real time, requiring only a spectroscope to reliably predict graft survival within the first 30-45 minutes of HOPE. The clinical value and head-to-head comparison of various allograft viability parameters in the HOPE vs. NMP setting has yet to be explored in the setting of a large multicenter RCT. With the advent of clinical MP and the context of a dire donation situation in the western world, it will be of utmost clinical importance to identify the most effective dynamic preservation technique. While past and current clinical trials in DCD and DBD liver transplantation were designed to compare different MP approaches with CCS as the clinical standard, a direct comparison between different end-ischemic MP techniques (HOPE versus NMP) is still lacking.
- Conditions
- Hepatocellular Injury, Liver Transplant Disorder
- Being tested
- Hypothermic oxygenated perfusion (HOPE), Normothermic machine perfusion (NMP)
- Keywords
- ex-vivo machine Perfusion, Hypothermic oxygenated machine perfusion, Normothermic machine perfusion, Orthotopic liver transplantation, Extended criteria donation, Donation after brain death, HOPE, NMP
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Hypothermic oxygenated perfusion (HOPE)Device
Also called Hypothermic machine perfusion (HMP)
HOPE for 1 hour via the portal vein in a recirculating and pressure controlled system (2-3 mm Hg), 0.1 ml/g liver/min, perfusion volume 3-4 L, Belzer (UW) machine perfusion solution, perfusate temperature 10 °C, perfusate oxygenation pO2 of 60-80 kPa
Normothermic machine perfusion (NMP)Device
End-ischemic NMP will be continued throughout the recipient hepatectomy and until the transplanting team is ready to implant the liver. The minimum protocol-stipulated NMP duration is 4 hours, the time needed for ATP repletion in animal studies. Total NMP preservation time will be according to the official recommendations of the manufacturer (4-24 hours) and at the discretion of the local transplant centre. The liver allograft will be disconnected from the OrganOx metra® device immediately prior to transplantation and flushed with three litres of HTK via the hepatic artery and the portal vein.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Hypothermic oxygenated perfusion (HOPE) | Experimental | Application of end-ischemic Hypothermic machine perfusion (HOPE) for a minimum of 2 hours (until hepatectomy) Receives: Device: Hypothermic oxygenated perfusion (HOPE) |
| Normothermic machine perfusion (NMP) | Experimental | Application of end-ischemic normothermic machine perfusion (NMP) for a minimum of 4 hours (up to 24 hours) Receives: Device: Normothermic machine perfusion (NMP) |
| Conventional cold storage (CCS) | Active comparator | Conventional cold storage Receives: Device: Hypothermic oxygenated perfusion (HOPE); Device: Normothermic machine perfusion (NMP) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Postoperative complications
Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI) (assessed after the first 90-days postoperatively)
Measured: After the first 90-days postoperatively
Secondary outcomes (13)
Peak alanine aminotransferase (ALT)
Peak serum alanine aminotransferase-ALT
Measured: During the first week postoperatively
Peak aspartate aminotransferase (AST)
Peak serum aspartate aminotransferase-AST
Measured: During the first week postoperatively
Early allograft dysfunction (EAD)
Olthoff criteria (bilirubin 10mg/dL on day 7, international normalized ratio 1.6 on day 7, and alanine or aspartate aminotransferases >2000 IU/L)
Measured: During the first week postoperatively
Primary non-function (PNF)
Graft with poor function requiring re-transplantation or leading to death within 7 days after the primary procedure without any identifiable cause of graft failure
Measured: During the first week postoperatively
Biliary complications
as assessed by MRI / MRCP
Measured: at 6 months postoperatively
Organ utilization rate
Rate of donor-allograft offers that result in liver transplantation
Measured: During the first week postoperatively
Total organ preservation time
Organ logistics
Measured: Before preservation (HOPE or NPM or CCS), after liver implantation (0-3 hours)
Duration and costs of initial intensive care unit (ICU) stay
Length of initial Intensive care unit (ICU) stay is determined in days of admission following liver transplantation.
Measured: Subjects will be followed for 6 months postoperatively
Duration of hospital stay
Length of hospital stay is determined in days of hospital admission after discharge and up to six months after liver transplantation
Measured: Subjects will be followed for 6 months postoperatively
Costs of hospital stay
Costs of hospital stay is determined in days of hospital admission after discharge and up to six months after liver transplantation
Measured: Subjects will be followed for 6 months postoperatively
Postoperative complications
According to the Comprehensive complication index (CCI)
Measured: Subjects will be followed for one year postoperatively
Postoperative major complications
According to the Clavien-Dindo complication score
Measured: Subjects will be followed for one year postoperatively
One-year recipient- and graft survival
One year patient and graft survival
Measured: Subjects will be followed for one year postoperatively
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted25 Nov 2020
- Study start14 Jan 2021
- Primary completionDec 2023 (estimated)
- Study completionDec 2024 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Hepatocellular InjuryStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Charite University, Berlin, GermanyThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Randomized controlled trial
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 213 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Charite University, Berlin, Germany
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Georg Lurje, MD, Charite University, Berlin, Germany
- Investigators
- Georg Lurje, M.D., Principal investigator, Charite University, Berlin, Germany
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04644744
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- EA2/270/20
- Acronym
- HOPE-NMP
- Status last verified
- Jul 2022
- First submitted
- 13 Nov 2020
- Last updated
- 22 Jul 2022
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 22 Jul 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- End-ischemic Hypothermic Oxygenated (HOPE) vs. Normothermic Machine Perfusion (NMP) Compared to Conventional Cold Storage in Donation After Brain Death Liver Transplantation; a Prospective Multicentre Randomized Controlled Trial (HOPE-NMP)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04644744
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- HOPE-NMP / EA2/270/20
- Conditions
- Hepatocellular Injury, Liver Transplant Disorder
- Keywords
- ex-vivo machine Perfusion, Hypothermic oxygenated machine perfusion, Normothermic machine perfusion, Orthotopic liver transplantation, Extended criteria donation, Donation after brain death, HOPE, NMP
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 213 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Charite University, Berlin, GermanyUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 14 Jan 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Dec 2023 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Dec 2024 (estimated)
- First posted
- 25 Nov 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The common practice of conventional cold storage (CCS) organ preservation has changed little since the initial introduction of the original University of Wisconsin (UW) organ preservation solution in the late 1980s. CCS relies on hypothermia to decelerate metabolism and reduce oxygen demand in order to prolong the time of ischemia without rapid functional graft impairment, therefore merely delaying graft damage. While CCS only prolongs storage time and limits the damage sustained during the period of cold ischemia, ex-vivo machine perfusion (MP) appears to be capable of reversing some of these effects. Currently, two main paradigms prevail in the clinical approach to liver allograft MP: hypothermic oxygenated MP (HOPE) may be seen as a dynamic alternative of the traditional organ preservation based on hypothermia-induced deceleration of metabolism, which aims to combine the positive effects of hypothermia observed in classical cold storage (e.g. technical simplicity, relative safety, decreased metabolism) with the positive effects of dynamic preservation (e.g. controlled sheer stress mediated gene activation, removal of metabolites, transport of oxygen and ATP recharging). Normothermic perfusion (NMP) aims at re-equilibration of cellular metabolism by preserving the organ at physiological temperatures whilst ensuring sufficient oxygen and nutrient supply. In both approaches, the perpetual circulation and moderate shear-stress sustain endothelial functionality. While past and current clinical trials were designed to compare different MP approaches with CCS as the clinical standard, a direct comparison between different end-ischemic MP techniques (HOPE versus NMP) is still lacking. The purpose of this study is to test the effects of end-ischemic NMP versus end-ischemic HOPE technique in a multicentre prospective randomized controlled clinical trial (RCT) on ECD liver grafts in DBD liver-transplantation (HOPE-NMP). Two-hundred-thirteen (n = 213) human whole organ liver grafts will be submitted to either 4-24 hours of NMP (n = 85) or 2-3 hours of HOPE (n = 85) directly before implantation and going to be compared to a control-group of patients (n = 43) transplanted with static cold storage preserved ECD-allografts. Primary (surgical complications as assessed by the comprehensive complication index [CCI]) and secondary (among others laboratory values, graft- and patient survival, hospital costs, hospital stay) endpoints are going to be analysed.)
Detailed description
Liver transplantation has evolved as the mainstay of treatment for end-stage liver disease. While the demand for organ transplantation has increased over time, Germany's organ donation rate is low compared to other countries. The main indications for listing are 'fibrosis and cirrhosis' (27%) followed by 'alcoholic liver disease' (23%) and 'hepatic malignancies' (17%).
With the advent of emerging waiting list mortality, several strategies for donor pool expansion are being pursued; these include the use of living donors, splitting of cadaveric livers for two recipients, and the use of extended criteria donor (ECD) allografts for OLT. These ECD-allografts, however, exhibit poor tolerance to ischemia-reperfusion (I/R) injury, an important cause of liver damage. As such, I/R-injury is the underlying cause of graft dysfunction in ECD-allografts and negatively affects the process of liver regeneration in surgical conditions including hepatic resections and OLT.
Machine perfusion with oxygenated blood was already implemented in the first series of 11 successful human OLTs in the 1960s. While the logistical simplicity and reliable performance of CCS led to its quick adoption as the standard solid organ preservation technique, the increased utilization of high-risk organs has unveiled the limitations of CCS, furthering the debate on the impact of different MP techniques. Today, perfusion conditions vary broadly, especially in preclinical research. Parameters under discussion include different temperatures, perfusate composition, the application of perfusion flow (continuous or pulsatile), the timing and duration of the perfusion, starting either at the donor site or applied only end-ischemic in the recipient centre. Two main principles have been translated into clinical practice today: hypothermic oxygenated perfusion (HOPE) and normothermic MP (NMP). The latter differs significantly from HOPE because the allograft is perfused with oxygenated red blood cells or oxygen carriers at physiological temperatures with the aim to reduce the ischemic graft injury by minimizing the duration of cold preservation and perfectly mimicking physiological conditions. A recently completed randomized controlled trial (RCT) by Nasralla et al. proved the feasibility of NMP for OLT and demonstrated a significant reduction in peak AST and subsequent early allograft dysfunction (EAD), however without a significant difference in graft and patient survival. Most recently, a development of the NMP technique that allowed a 7-day preservation of human livers with a sustained metabolic function and an intact liver structure was recently reported by Eshmuminov et al. Based on the sustained full hepatic metabolism during NMP, several groups are currently exploring the possibility of normothermic viability testing. The cellular mechanisms of organ protection by NMP do not center around IRI mitigation and reconditioning, but IRI prevention, and are altogether different from cold perfusion techniques. While normothermic machine perfusion is most effective when applied during the entire period of organ preservation, the end-ischemic application of this technique in the recipient hospital is becoming more popular.
There are two main hypotheses on the underlying mechanisms of HOPE induced organ protection; (I.) modulation of cellular metabolism (energy household, mitochondrial respiration), and (II.) stimulation of the sinusoidal endothelial layer. Although, tissue oxygen consumption is markedly decreased at 4-10 Celsius, it is not completely suspended. The shift of mitochondrial metabolism to anaerobic pathways leads to expressed mitochondrial metabolite accumulation during ischemia and subsequently to extreme radical oxygen species (ROS) generation through rapid re-oxidization by the early reperfusion respiratory burst. The delivery of oxygen during cold preservation can effectively upload cellular energy household via various mitochondrial pathways. Pre-implantation resuscitation of organs with machine perfusion and oxygen can increase tissue ATP levels and decrease the post-ischemic production of ROS and danger-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs), this subsequently leads to a mitigated immune response. This organ conditioning effect is attributed to a controlled re-oxygenation inducing moderate ROS release just before reperfusion. These low levels of ROS are not only responsible for the induction of antioxidant enzymes (heme-oxygenase, gluthathione-synthase, superoxide-dismutase), but are also responsible for the stimulation of protein mediators of innate pro-survival mechanisms. A further mechanism behind the protective effects of dynamic preservation approaches is the presence of shear stress and as such active perfusion during the preservation phase may induce specific shear stress-sensitive genes some of which include Kruppel-like factor 2 or endothelial nitric oxide synthase. Currently, three multicenter RCTs have completed their patient recruitment and clinical results are expected for the year 2021. The Zurich group initiated a multicentric RCT to assess the impact of HOPE on any DBD liver graft including retransplantations and marginal livers and is powered to assess major complications (Clavien grade ≥III) (NCT01317342). The Groningen team explores the dual HOPE (d-HOPE) technique in DCD grafts (NCT02584283) and our own group initiated a multicentric RCT on HOPE in ECD-DBD liver transplantation in 2017 (NCT03124641).
Viability assessment during MP can guide the clinical decision whether to accept a liver for transplantation and is therefore an important emerging tool in ECD OLT. The possibility of a reliable viability assessment is advocated as a considerable advantage of normothermic perfusion techniques. By sustaining full metabolism, NMP allows to analyse several makers of liver function and injury, including biliary parameters (e.g. bile flow, bile glucose, bicarbonate and pH), perfusate pH and base excess, portal venous- and hepatic artery flow and perfusate hepatocellular enzymes. Despite the reduced metabolic activity during cold storage and hypothermic liver perfusion, there is increasing evidence that a prediction of future graft performance after transplantation may be possible during HOPE, as well. Analysis of the cold perfusate during HOPE provides a unique opportunity to identity potential biomarkers which are associated with various post-OLT outcomes. A recent study involving 31 human ECD-DBD grafts initially rejected for transplantation, found that cold perfusion not only ameliorates reperfusion injury but also allows for graft viability assessment. Thus, the 2-hour perfusate AST and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) correlated significantly with the peak AST after implantation. In two grafts with a significant postreperfusion transaminase release, a high portal perfusion pressure was noted.
The Zurich group has recently presented a new mitochondrial marker to assess viability of entire liver grafts during HOPE. Real-time fluorometric analysis of mitochondrial flavin mononucleotide (FMN) in the HOPE perfusate predicted human liver function, complications and graft loss prior to transplantation. The use of this surrogate parameter could facilitate proper clinical decision making whether to accept or decline allografts in the HOPE setting. This marker is currently validated in other solid organs and also in the RCT of Guarerras working group. Importantly, the quantification of FMN is possible in real time, requiring only a spectroscope to reliably predict graft survival within the first 30-45 minutes of HOPE. The clinical value and head-to-head comparison of various allograft viability parameters in the HOPE vs. NMP setting has yet to be explored in the setting of a large multicenter RCT. With the advent of clinical MP and the context of a dire donation situation in the western world, it will be of utmost clinical importance to identify the most effective dynamic preservation technique. While past and current clinical trials in DCD and DBD liver transplantation were designed to compare different MP approaches with CCS as the clinical standard, a direct comparison between different end-ischemic MP techniques (HOPE versus NMP) is still lacking.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 3
- Model description
- Randomized controlled trial
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Hypothermic oxygenated perfusion (HOPE) | Experimental | Device: Hypothermic oxygenated perfusion (HOPE)Application of end-ischemic Hypothermic machine perfusion (HOPE) for a minimum of 2 hours (until hepatectomy) |
| Normothermic machine perfusion (NMP) | Experimental | Device: Normothermic machine perfusion (NMP)Application of end-ischemic normothermic machine perfusion (NMP) for a minimum of 4 hours (up to 24 hours) |
| Conventional cold storage (CCS) | Active comparator | Device: Hypothermic oxygenated perfusion (HOPE), Device: Normothermic machine perfusion (NMP)Conventional cold storage |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 75 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Signed informed consent
- Patients 18 years or older
- Patients suffering from end stage-liver disease and/or malignant liver tumours
- Listed for OLT
- Receiving ECD-allografts
Key exclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Recipients of split or living donor liver transplants
- Previous liver transplantation
- Combined transplantations (liver-kidney, liver-lung, etc.)
- Participation in other liver related trials
- The subject received an investigational drug within 30 days prior to inclusion
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Hypothermic oxygenated perfusion (HOPE)Also: Hypothermic machine perfusion (HMP)HOPE for 1 hour via the portal vein in a recirculating and pressure controlled system (2-3 mm Hg), 0.1 ml/g liver/min, perfusion volume 3-4 L, Belzer (UW) machine perfusion solution, perfusate temperature 10 °C, perfusate oxygenation pO2 of 60-80 kPa | Device | Conventional cold storage (CCS), Hypothermic oxygenated perfusion (HOPE) |
| Normothermic machine perfusion (NMP)End-ischemic NMP will be continued throughout the recipient hepatectomy and until the transplanting team is ready to implant the liver. The minimum protocol-stipulated NMP duration is 4 hours, the time needed for ATP repletion in animal studies. Total NMP preservation time will be according to the official recommendations of the manufacturer (4-24 hours) and at the discretion of the local transplant centre. The liver allograft will be disconnected from the OrganOx metra® device immediately prior to transplantation and flushed with three litres of HTK via the hepatic artery and the portal vein. | Device | Conventional cold storage (CCS), Normothermic machine perfusion (NMP) |
Primary outcome
Postoperative complications
Time frame: After the first 90-days postoperatively
Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI) (assessed after the first 90-days postoperatively)
13 secondary outcomes
Peak alanine aminotransferase (ALT)
Time frame: During the first week postoperatively
Peak aspartate aminotransferase (AST)
Time frame: During the first week postoperatively
Early allograft dysfunction (EAD)
Time frame: During the first week postoperatively
Primary non-function (PNF)
Time frame: During the first week postoperatively
Biliary complications
Time frame: at 6 months postoperatively
Organ utilization rate
Time frame: During the first week postoperatively
Total organ preservation time
Time frame: Before preservation (HOPE or NPM or CCS), after liver implantation (0-3 hours)
Duration and costs of initial intensive care unit (ICU) stay
Time frame: Subjects will be followed for 6 months postoperatively
Duration of hospital stay
Time frame: Subjects will be followed for 6 months postoperatively
Costs of hospital stay
Time frame: Subjects will be followed for 6 months postoperatively
Postoperative complications
Time frame: Subjects will be followed for one year postoperatively
Postoperative major complications
Time frame: Subjects will be followed for one year postoperatively
One-year recipient- and graft survival
Time frame: Subjects will be followed for one year postoperatively
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 22 Jul 2022.
- Study webpageLink provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Hepatocellular Injury
Recruiting
Identification of Anti-HIF 1alpha Autoantibodies in Patients With Anorexia Nervosa and Characterization of Their Pathogenic Potential in Undernutrition-associated Hepatic Cytolysis
Hepatic Cytolysis
RecruitingPhase 4
Comparative Evaluation of the Performance of Different Thromboplastin Reagents on Prothrombin Time in Situations of Isolated Extrinsic Pathway Factor Deficiency or Liver Damage
Hemorrhagic Disorders
RecruitingObservational study
Digital Early Warning System for Acute Lung Injury in Liver Surgery
Acute Lung Injury(ALI), Liver Cirrhosis
Not yet recruiting
Risk Stratification and Proactive Nursing Intervention for Acute Kidney Injury Following Interventional Therapy in Patients With Liver Cancer
Liver Cancer, Adult
RecruitingPhase 1
A Study of Eloralintide (LY3841136) in Participants With Different Levels of Liver Damage and in Participants With Healthy Livers.
Hepatic Insufficiency
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Georg Lurje, M.D. principal investigator
Charite University, Berlin, Germany
4 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Hypothermic oxygenated perfusion (HOPE) and Normothermic machine perfusion (NMP) in people with Hepatocellular Injury and Liver Transplant Disorder, run by Charite University, Berlin, Germany at 4 sites in Germany.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 Jul 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 4 sites in Germany. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Georg Lurje, M.D. (+4930450652339, georg.lurje@charite.de), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Postoperative complications (time frame: After the first 90-days postoperatively). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 Jul 2022.