MoodCALMNCT04646213
Managing Cancer and Living Meaningfully
A study testing Managing Cancer and Living Meaningfully (CALM) Therapy in people with Mood and Cancer Brain, run by Virginia Commonwealth University at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to pilot test an empirically supported psychotherapeutic intervention, Managing Cancer and Living Meaningfully (CALM). Researchers hope to better understand the potential benefits of this intervention on brain tumor patients' mood and quality of life. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Mood, Cancer Brain
- What is being tested?
- Managing Cancer and Living Meaningfully (CALM) Therapy
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 14 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 3 Dec 2020to 14 Feb 2022
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- have a confirmed malignant brain cancer diagnosis via histopathology
- be a minimum of 2 weeks post-surgical resection or biopsy (if applicable)
- be primarily English speaking
- be age 18-89
- obtain >20 on the Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status (TICS)
- have current elevated depression or death anxiety symptoms
- have a reliable internet connection to participate in the Zoom therapy sessions
Who cannot join
- Major communication difficulties as determined by the research team which would prohibit psychotherapeutic interaction
- inability to meet with interventionist via an electronic device for telehealth intervention sessions
- inability to provide informed consent
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Virginia Commonwealth University
Richmond, Virginia, 23298
About this study
Official title: Managing Cancer and Living Meaningfully (CALM) in Primary Brain Tumor Patients
The purpose of this study is to pilot test an empirically supported psychotherapeutic intervention, Managing Cancer and Living Meaningfully (CALM). Researchers hope to better understand the potential benefits of this intervention on brain tumor patients' mood and quality of life. This may lead to improvements in doctor's understanding of how to enhance brain tumor patient's wellbeing and overall functioning.
Read the detailed description
In this study, participants will be asked to do the following things:
- Complete ~15-minute online surveys before the program, immediately after the program (4 months), and at follow-up (6 months). . Questions will ask about mood, anxiety, death distress, quality of social relationships, and satisfaction with life.
- Meet with an interventionist six times (biweekly) for individual sessions via Zoom, lasting 50-60 minutes each. Sessions will be audio-recorded to ensure all participants receive the same information. Participants will be asked to only use first names.
- Complete weekly ~5 minute online surveys after each session on satisfaction with the program.
- Complete an exit interview by telephone approximately 1 month after the 6-session intervention. This exit interview will last approximately 15-30 minutes.
- Conditions
- Mood, Cancer Brain
- Being tested
- Managing Cancer and Living Meaningfully (CALM) Therapy
- Medical subject headings
- Brain Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Managing Cancer and Living Meaningfully (CALM) TherapyBehavioural
6 sessions of individualized CALM therapy
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Therapy | Experimental | psychotherapeutic intervention Receives: Behavioral: Managing Cancer and Living Meaningfully (CALM) Therapy |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Recruitment for CALM
Number of potential participants consented and enrolled
Measured: 1 day
Completion of CALM Sessions
Number of participants completing CALM sessions
Measured: 3 months
Post-session Assessment Completion
Number of participants completing post-session surveys
Measured: 4 months
Follow-up Assessment Completion
Number of participants that completed a follow-up survey
Measured: 6 months
Satisfaction With CALM Sessions
Average rating of CALM session satisfaction score (average score across all participants following each CALM session multiple timepoints). Rating option is a range from 1 to 5 with 1 being not at all satisfied and 5 being very much satisfied. Higher scores indicate greater satisfaction.
Measured: Following each CALM session, every 2 weeks for 6 sessions: Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12
Helpfulness of CALM Sessions
Average rating of CALM session helpfulness score (average score across all participants following each CALM session multiple timepoints). Rating option is a range from 1 to 5 with 1 being not at all helpful and 5 being very much helpful. Higher scores indicate greater helpfulness.
Measured: Following each CALM session, every 2 weeks for 6 sessions: Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12
Relevance of CALM
Average rating of CALM session relevance score (average score across all participants following each CALM session multiple timepoints). Rating option is a range from 1 to 5 with 1 being not at all relevant and 5 being very much relevant. Higher scores indicate greater helpfulness.
Measured: Following each CALM session, every 2 weeks for 6 sessions: Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12
Utility of CALM
Average rating of CALM session utility score (average score across all participants following each CALM session multiple timepoints). Rating option is a range from 1 to 5 with 1 being not at all useful and 5 being very much useful. Higher scores indicate greater helpfulness.
Measured: Following each CALM session, every 2 weeks for 6 sessions: Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12
Intervention Satisfaction
Mean rating of intervention satisfaction score (average score across all participants who completed the CALM intervention - one timepoint). Rating option is a range from 1 to 5 with 1 being not at all satisfied and 5 being very much satisfied. Higher scores indicate greater satisfaction.
Measured: 3 month - one timepoint
Number of Participants Likely to Recommend the Program to Others
Rating of the likelihood of recommending the program to others.
Measured: 3 month timepoint
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted27 Nov 2020
- Study start3 Dec 2020
- Primary completion14 Sep 2021
- Study completion14 Feb 2022
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for MoodStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Virginia Commonwealth UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 14 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Virginia Commonwealth University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- American Cancer Society, Inc.
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Ashlee Loughan, PhD, Principal investigator, Virginia Commonwealth University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04646213
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- MCC-20-16440
- Other IDs
- HM20020308
- Acronym
- CALM
- Status last verified
- Mar 2024
- First submitted
- 20 Nov 2020
- Last updated
- 13 Mar 2024
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: Individual level data will not be shared other researchers. Access to all data will be limited to study personnel.
Publications
Loughan AR, Willis KD, Braun SE, Rodin G, Lanoye A, Davies AE, Svikis D, Mazzeo S, Malkin M, Thacker L. Managing cancer and living meaningfully (CALM) in adults with malignant glioma: a proof-of-concept phase IIa trial. J Neurooncol. 2022 May;157(3):447-456. doi: 10.1007/s11060-022-03988-8. Epub 2022 Apr 18.
PubMed 35437687
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 13 Mar 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Managing Cancer and Living Meaningfully (CALM) in Primary Brain Tumor Patients
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04646213
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CALM / MCC-20-16440
- Conditions
- Mood, Cancer Brain
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 14 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Virginia Commonwealth UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- American Cancer Society, Inc.
- Study start
- 3 Dec 2020 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 14 Sep 2021 (actual)
- Study completion
- 14 Feb 2022 (actual)
- First posted
- 27 Nov 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 13 Mar 2024
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to pilot test an empirically supported psychotherapeutic intervention, Managing Cancer and Living Meaningfully (CALM). Researchers hope to better understand the potential benefits of this intervention on brain tumor patients' mood and quality of life. This may lead to improvements in doctor's understanding of how to enhance brain tumor patient's wellbeing and overall functioning.
Detailed description
In this study, participants will be asked to do the following things:
- Complete ~15-minute online surveys before the program, immediately after the program (4 months), and at follow-up (6 months). . Questions will ask about mood, anxiety, death distress, quality of social relationships, and satisfaction with life.
- Meet with an interventionist six times (biweekly) for individual sessions via Zoom, lasting 50-60 minutes each. Sessions will be audio-recorded to ensure all participants receive the same information. Participants will be asked to only use first names.
- Complete weekly ~5 minute online surveys after each session on satisfaction with the program.
- Complete an exit interview by telephone approximately 1 month after the 6-session intervention. This exit interview will last approximately 15-30 minutes.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Therapy | Experimental | Behavioral: Managing Cancer and Living Meaningfully (CALM) Therapypsychotherapeutic intervention |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- have a confirmed malignant brain cancer diagnosis via histopathology
- be a minimum of 2 weeks post-surgical resection or biopsy (if applicable)
- be primarily English speaking
- be age 18-89
- obtain >20 on the Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status (TICS)
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Major communication difficulties as determined by the research team which would prohibit psychotherapeutic interaction
- inability to meet with interventionist via an electronic device for telehealth intervention sessions
- inability to provide informed consent
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Managing Cancer and Living Meaningfully (CALM) Therapy6 sessions of individualized CALM therapy | Behavioural | Therapy |
Primary outcome
Recruitment for CALM
Time frame: 1 day
Number of potential participants consented and enrolled
Completion of CALM Sessions
Time frame: 3 months
Number of participants completing CALM sessions
Post-session Assessment Completion
Time frame: 4 months
Number of participants completing post-session surveys
Follow-up Assessment Completion
Time frame: 6 months
Number of participants that completed a follow-up survey
Satisfaction With CALM Sessions
Time frame: Following each CALM session, every 2 weeks for 6 sessions: Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12
Average rating of CALM session satisfaction score (average score across all participants following each CALM session multiple timepoints). Rating option is a range from 1 to 5 with 1 being not at all satisfied and 5 being very much satisfied. Higher scores indicate greater satisfaction.
Helpfulness of CALM Sessions
Time frame: Following each CALM session, every 2 weeks for 6 sessions: Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12
Average rating of CALM session helpfulness score (average score across all participants following each CALM session multiple timepoints). Rating option is a range from 1 to 5 with 1 being not at all helpful and 5 being very much helpful. Higher scores indicate greater helpfulness.
Relevance of CALM
Time frame: Following each CALM session, every 2 weeks for 6 sessions: Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12
Average rating of CALM session relevance score (average score across all participants following each CALM session multiple timepoints). Rating option is a range from 1 to 5 with 1 being not at all relevant and 5 being very much relevant. Higher scores indicate greater helpfulness.
Utility of CALM
Time frame: Following each CALM session, every 2 weeks for 6 sessions: Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12
Average rating of CALM session utility score (average score across all participants following each CALM session multiple timepoints). Rating option is a range from 1 to 5 with 1 being not at all useful and 5 being very much useful. Higher scores indicate greater helpfulness.
Intervention Satisfaction
Time frame: 3 month - one timepoint
Mean rating of intervention satisfaction score (average score across all participants who completed the CALM intervention - one timepoint). Rating option is a range from 1 to 5 with 1 being not at all satisfied and 5 being very much satisfied. Higher scores indicate greater satisfaction.
Number of Participants Likely to Recommend the Program to Others
Time frame: 3 month timepoint
Rating of the likelihood of recommending the program to others.
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 13 Mar 2024.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 35437687Loughan AR, Willis KD, Braun SE, Rodin G, Lanoye A, Davies AE, Svikis D, Mazzeo S, Malkin M, Thacker L. Managing cancer and living meaningfully (CALM) in adults with malignant glioma: a proof-of-concept phase IIa trial. J Neurooncol. 2022 May;157(3):447-456. doi: 10.1007/s11060-022-03988-8. Epub 2022 Apr 18.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. Individual level data will not be shared other researchers. Access to all data will be limited to study personnel.
Related trials for Mood
Recruiting
Unified Protocol in Penitentiary Facilities
Depression Disorders, Anxiety
Not yet recruiting
Preventive and Personalized Digital Emotion Regulation Skills Intervention to Reduce Depression and Anxiety in Youths With Adverse Childhood Experiences
Adverse Childhood Experience, Depression / Major Depressive Disorder
RecruitingPhase 4
Biomarker-Guided Antidepressant Selection
Depression - Major Depressive Disorder, Treatment-resistant Depression (TRD)
Recruiting
Targeting Network Dysfunction in Apathy of Late-life Depression Using Digital Therapeutics
Major Depressive Disorder, Apathy
RecruitingObservational study
Psychotherapy for Irritability in Youth: Comparing Active Treatment to Nonactive Psychoeducation Supportive Psychotherapy
Irritability, Disruptive Mood Dysregulation Disorder
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Ashlee Loughan, PhD principal investigator
Virginia Commonwealth University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Managing Cancer and Living Meaningfully (CALM) Therapy in people with Mood and Cancer Brain, run by Virginia Commonwealth University at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Mar 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 13 Mar 2024). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Recruitment for CALM (time frame: 1 day). The study lists 10 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04646213, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Mar 2024.