AzTrials
AzTrials

Type 2 DiabetesNCT04646746

Acute Studies on the Glycemic Index After Intake of Different Sorts of Barley in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes

A study testing 100% wheat, 50% nude barley and 50% wheat and 75% nude barley and 25% wheat in people with Type 2 Diabetes, run by University of Aarhus at 1 site in Denmark.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

In a series of double-blinded randomized cross-over acute studies, the investigators want to study the effects of different types of barley on the glycemic index (GI) in subjects with type 2 diabetes. The most common type of barley in Denmark is with rind and demands processing before use. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Type 2 Diabetes
What is being tested?
100% wheat, 50% nude barley and 50% wheat and 75% nude barley and 25% wheat
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
20 participants
Where
1 siteDenmark
Study dates
8 Feb 2021to 29 Oct 2021
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Type 2 diabetes (T2D) defined by standard Danish guidelines.
  • HbA1c between 48-78 mmol/l.
  • Treatment with drugs for hypertension and high cholesterol is allowed if the treatment dose is stable and does not demand changes during the study period.
  • Participants are encouraged to maintain their present psychical activity level and their smoking and alcohol habits.

Who cannot join

  • Type 1 diabetes
  • Insulin demanding T2D
  • Use of weekly administrated GLP-1 antagonist (e.g. ozempic, trulicity or byetta)
  • Use of acarbose
  • Significant cardiovascular, kidney, liver or endocrine comorbidity
  • Significant psychiatric history
Show all 10Show fewer
  • Treatment with steroids
  • Alcohol or drug abuse
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding
  • Legally incompetent

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Denmark1 site
  • Aarhus University Hospital

    Aarhus, 8200

Other trials in Denmark

About this study

Official title: HIAMBA-1 - the Effects of Nude Barley and Gene-modified High-amylose Barley on Postprandial Glucose Metabolism in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes

In a series of double-blinded randomized cross-over acute studies, the investigators want to study the effects of different types of barley on the glycemic index (GI) in subjects with type 2 diabetes.

The most common type of barley in Denmark is with rind and demands processing before use. Processing may remove important nutrients from the barley. Some of the original antiquity barley has a loose rind (nude barley), that falls off during harvesting, and thereby reduces the need for processing. The investigators want to study how this ancient type of barley affects GI.

Furthermore, some of the investigators collaborative partners have made it possible to increase the amount of amylose in regular barley by genetic modification. The investigators want to study the effect on GI of this new type of modified barley.

Read the detailed description

Approx. 60 mio. people worldwide live with diabetes and the prevalence is increasing. The increase is primarily due to obesity, unhealthy diet and lack of physical activity. Therefore, it is important to find dietary products that counteracts this development.

Intake of food with a low glycemic index (GI) reduces the risk of developing type 2 diabetes (T2D) and helps in the regulation of a preexisting diabetes.

Barley has shown some beneficial effects on GI compared with wheat, however, barley is not commonly used in bread making in Denmark.

The most common type of barley in Denmark is with rind and demands processing before use. Processing may remove important nutrients from the barley. Some of the original antiquity barley has a loose rind (nude barley), that falls of during harvesting, and thereby reduces the need for processing. However, it is not known how this ancient type of barley affects GI.

The composition of the starch in barley is of importance when the grain is degraded after consumption. The starch consists of both amylose (which is slowly degraded) and amylopectin (which is quickly degraded). By genetic modification, it was possible for collaborative researchers at the Universities of Aarhus and Copenhagen to increase the amount of amylose in regular barley. Slowly degraded starch is expected to decrease GI.

In a series of acute studies the investigators want to study the effects on the glucose metabolism to intake of bread made with different compositions of wheat, nude barley and gene-modified high-amylose barley in subjects with T2D.

It is expected that both nude barley and gene-modified high-amylose barley lowers the postprandial glycemic response more than wheat and hereby positively affect the glycemic regulation for subjects with type 2 diabetes.

Conditions
Type 2 Diabetes
Being tested
100% wheat, 50% nude barley and 50% wheat, 75% nude barley and 25% wheat, 50% gene-modified high-amylose barley and 50% wheat
Keywords
Glycemic index, Postprandial, Barley
Medical subject headings
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • 100% wheatDietary supplement

    100 g of bread backed with 100% wheat

  • 50% nude barley and 50% wheatDietary supplement

    100 g of bread backed with 50% nude barley and 50% wheat

  • 75% nude barley and 25% wheatDietary supplement

    100 g of bread backed with 75% of nude barley and 25% wheat

  • 50% gene-modified high-amylose barley and 50% wheatDietary supplement

    100 g of bread backed with 50% gene-modified high-amylose barley and 50% wheat

Study groups in NCT04646746
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
100 g of 100% wheat breadExperimentalIntake of 250 ml of tap water and 100 g of bread baked with 100% wheat flour (regular commercial available wheat flour). Consumed over maximum 10 minutes at time 0 min after overnight fasting. At one of four visits.
Receives: Dietary Supplement: 100% wheat
Nude barley 50%ExperimentalIntake of 250 ml of tap water and 100 g of bread baked with 50% nude barley flour and 50% wheat flour. Consumed over maximum 10 minutes at time 0 min after overnight fasting. At one of four visits. Ancient nude barley naturally bred in corporation with PlantCarb ApS and researchers at Aarhus and Copenhagen Universities. The wheat flour is standard commercial available flour.
Receives: Dietary Supplement: 50% nude barley and 50% wheat
Nude barley 75%ExperimentalIntake of 250 ml of tapwater and 100 g of bread baked with 75% nude barley flour and 25% wheat flour. Consumed over maximum 10 minutes at time 0 min after overnight fasting. At one of four visits. Ancient nude barley naturally bred in corporation with PlantCarb ApS and researchers at Aarhus and Copenhagen Universities. The wheat flour is standard commercial available flour.
Receives: Dietary Supplement: 75% nude barley and 25% wheat
Gen-modified high-amylose barleyExperimentalIntake of 250 ml of tap water and 100 g of bread baked with 50% gene-modified high-amylose barley and 50% wheat. Consumed over maximum 10 minutes at time 0 min after overnight fasting. At one of four visits. The gene-modified barley is produced by researchers at Aarhus and Copenhagen Universities as published in 'Carciofi M, et al., Concerted suppression of all starch branching enzyme genes in barley produces amylose-only starch granules. BMC Plant Biol. 2012 Nov 21;12:223. doi: 10.1186/1471-2229-12-223' The wheat flour is standard commercial available flour.
Receives: Dietary Supplement: 50% gene-modified high-amylose barley and 50% wheat

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Postprandial glycemic response

    Area under the curve for glucose (mmol/L)

    Measured: Change from -10 minutes to 240 minutes after bread intake (measured at time -10,0,10,20,30,45,60,90,120,150,180,210,240 minutes)

Secondary outcomes (6)
  1. Postprandial insulin response

    Area under the curve for insulin (pmol/L)

    Measured: Change from -10 minutes to 240 minutes after bread (measured at time -10,0,10,20,30,45,60,90,120,150,180,210,240 minutes)

  2. Postprandial glucagon response

    Area under the curve for glucagon (pg/mL)

    Measured: Change from -10 minutes to 240 minutes after bread (measured at time -10,0,10,20,30,45,60,90,120,150,180,210,240 minutes)

  3. Postprandial triglyceride response

    Area under the curve for triglyceride (mmol/L)

    Measured: Change from -10 minutes to 240 minutes after bread (measured at time -10,0,30,60,120,180,240 minutes)

  4. Postprandial free fatty acid response

    Area under the curve for free fatty acids (mmol/L)

    Measured: Change from -10 minutes to 240 minutes after bread (measured at time -10,0,30,60,120,180,240 minutes)

  5. Postprandial GLP-1 (glucagon-like peptide-1) response

    Area under the curve for GLP-1 (pmol/L)

    Measured: Change from -10 minutes to 240 minutes after bread (measured at time -10,0,30,60,120,180,240 minutes)

  6. Postprandial GIP (Glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide) response

    Area under the curve for GIP (pmol/L)

    Measured: Change from -10 minutes to 240 minutes after bread (measured at time -10,0,30,60,120,180,240 minutes)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted30 Nov 2020
  2. Study start8 Feb 2021
  3. Primary completion29 Oct 2021
  4. Study completion29 Oct 2021

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Crossover
Model description
Randomized, double-blinded, cross-over, acute, dietary intervention study
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator
Enrolment
20 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04646746
Sponsor's protocol ID
HIAMBA-1
Status last verified
May 2022
First submitted
16 Nov 2020
Last updated
6 May 2022
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Publications

  • Bohl M, Gregersen S, Zhong Y, Hebelstrup KH, Hermansen K. Beneficial glycaemic effects of high-amylose barley bread compared to wheat bread in type 2 diabetes. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2024 Mar;78(3):243-250. doi: 10.1038/s41430-023-01364-x. Epub 2023 Nov 8.

    PubMed 37940671

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing 100% wheat, 50% nude barley and 50% wheat and 75% nude barley and 25% wheat in people with Type 2 Diabetes, run by University of Aarhus at 1 site in Denmark.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 May 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Denmark. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Postprandial glycemic response (time frame: Change from -10 minutes to 240 minutes after bread intake (measured at time -10,0,10,20,30,45,60,90,120,150,180,210,240 minutes)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04646746, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 May 2022.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in