22q11.2 Deletion SyndromeNCT04647500
Effects of Methylphenidate on Brain and Cognition in 22q11 Deletion Syndrome
A study testing Concerta in people with 22q11.2 Deletion Syndrome, run by University of Geneva, Switzerland at 1 site in Switzerland.
Trial summary
Chromosome 22q11.2 deletion syndrome (22q11DS) is a neurogenetic condition associated with a high risk of psychiatric disorders, including schizophrenia spectrum disorders. This population is characterized by a specific neurocognitive profile and atypical brain development. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 8 to 25 years
- Conditions the study is for
- 22q11.2 Deletion Syndrome
- What is being tested?
- Concerta
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 45 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSwitzerland
- Study dates
- 26 Aug 2016to 26 Sep 2022
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 8 to 25 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult
Who may be able to join
- Male or female with confirmed 22q11DS diagnosis.
- Minimum age of 8 years or maximum age of 25 years and 11 months.
- Attention difficulties pointed out by parents and/or the participant.
- Sufficient verbal expression and comprehension skills to understand and follow instructions based on initial interview.
Who cannot join
- Participants younger than 8 years and older that 25 years and 11 months.
- Previous adverse experience with MPH
- Cardio-vascular diseases including rhythm disorders, severe hypertension, cardiac insufficiency, obliterating cardiac and peripheral arterial disease, preexisting cerebrovascular affections, hemodynamically significant congenital heart defect, channelopathies.
- For the naïve group only: corrected QT (QTc) distance at baseline electrocardiogram above 460 milliseconds or elongation at control electrocardiogram (Day 6 of treatment) superior to 30 milliseconds with functional complaint.
- Psychiatric affections including anxiety attack, psychic tension or restlessness, manic episode, marked psychotic symptoms, schizophrenia, borderline personality disorder, clinical depression (present or past), suicidal episode, diagnosis or family history of Tourette syndrome, alcohol or drug abuse.
- Other somatic affections including hyperthyroid, glaucoma, pheochromocytoma.
- Concurrent treatment with monoamine oxidase inhibitors or interruption less than 14 days before beginning of treatment.
- Pregnancy or breastfeeding.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Switzerland1 site
Developmental imaging and psychopathology lab
Geneva, 1204
About this study
Official title: Effects of Modulation of the Dopaminergic System Using Methylphenidate on Memory and Executive Processes in Individuals With 22q11.2 Deletion Syndrome
Chromosome 22q11.2 deletion syndrome (22q11DS) is a neurogenetic condition associated with a high risk of psychiatric disorders, including schizophrenia spectrum disorders. This population is characterized by a specific neurocognitive profile and atypical brain development. Methylphenidate is a psychostimulant used in the treatment of attention deficit with/without hyperactivity (ADHD). Although ADHD is one of the most important co-morbidities in 22q11DS, affecting 35-45% of patients, to date only two studies have focused on quantifying the efficacy of this treatment in this population. The objective of this study is to quantify the improvement in cognitive performance as well as the differences in brain connectivity associated with the methylphenidate molecule in a population at risk of cognitive impairment and the development of schizophrenia.
Read the detailed description
This study aimed to investigate the effects of methylphenidate (Concerta ®) in patients with 22q11DS. Outcome is evaluated based on changes in clinical and cognitive measures as well as brain connectivity (with magnetic resonance imaging and electroencephalography). Treatment benefits are evaluated in an intra-subject design, i.e. performance with/without treatment are compared for each patient. Depending on medication history and current psychostimulant medication, participants are included either in the consumer group (composed of participants with ongoing methylphenidate treatment) or in the naïve group (composed of participants naïve to the molecule). To the naive participants the investigators prescribe a 13-day treatment of Concerta ® at a weight-adjusted dose of 0.7 mg/kg). The treatment phase begins with a lower introductory dose for the first 5 days before moving on to the weight-adjusted dose. The effect of treatment on cognitive measures is assessed on day 6, with memory monitoring on days 7 and 13. The treatment effect evaluated using clinical measures and questionnaires was conducted at the end of the treatment phase to ensure multiple opportunities for observation by the participant and caregivers. For consumer participants, the procedure was similar. For visits with methylphenidate, participants will be asked to take their usual prescription. In order to best follow the procedure of the naïve group, for the visits without methylphenidate, the consumer participants were asked to interrupt their usual prescription for 13 days. Since many participants usually interrupt their treatment during vacations or sometimes on weekends, compliance is not a barrier. For methylphenidate-free visits, a 5-day break prior to assessment with cognitive measures will be requested from each participant. Again, in order to ensure several opportunities for observation for the participant and caregivers, assessments with clinical measures and questionnaires will be conducted at the end of the break, on day 13.
The research hypothesis of this study is that methylphenidate treatment has a beneficial effect on clinical and cognitive performance. Scores in the tests evaluating these areas are expected to be significantly better than when the tests were administered in the absence of the substance. A change in brain connectivity is also expected when the drug is taken, tending towards a "normalization" of brain connectivity. Finally, to find the link between changes in cognitive measures and changes in brain connectivity is investigated.
- Conditions
- 22q11.2 Deletion Syndrome
- Being tested
- Concerta
- Medical subject headings
- DiGeorge Syndrome
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
ConcertaDrug
Evaluation of a treatment of Concerta over a period of 13 days.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| 22q11DS naive | Other | 22q11DS participants naive to methylphenidate Receives: Drug: Concerta |
| 22q11DS consumer | Other | 22q11DS participants with a prolonged treatment of methylphenidate Receives: Drug: Concerta |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Conners' Continuous performance test, third edition (CPT-3)
Participants are instructed to press a button every time a letter appeared on the screen, except for the letter X where participants had to withhold their answer. Variables of interest are Detectability, Omission, Commission, Perseveration, Hit Reaction Time, Hit Reaction time Standard Deviation, Variability, Hit Reaction Time Block Change and Hit Reaction Time Inter- Stimulus Intervals Change.
Measured: CPT-3 pre-treatment
Conners' Continuous performance test, third edition (CPT-3)
Participants are instructed to press a button every time a letter appeared on the screen, except for the letter X where participants had to withhold their answer. Variables of interest are Detectability, Omission, Commission, Perseveration, Hit Reaction Time, Hit Reaction time Standard Deviation, Variability, Hit Reaction Time Block Change and Hit Reaction Time Inter- Stimulus Intervals Change.
Measured: CPT-3 6 days of treatment
Conners' Continuous performance test, third edition (CPT-3)
Participants are instructed to press a button every time a letter appeared on the screen, except for the letter X where participants had to withhold their answer. Variables of interest are Detectability, Omission, Commission, Perseveration, Hit Reaction Time, Hit Reaction time Standard Deviation, Variability, Hit Reaction Time Block Change and Hit Reaction Time Inter- Stimulus Intervals Change.
Measured: CPT-3 one month after the end of treatment
Stroop task
To measure the cost of cognitive inhibition in time, an inhibition ratio score is computed by dividing the raw score from the Stroop condition (participants have to name the color of the ink even though the word spells a different color) by the raw score in the color naming condition (participants are instructed to name rectangles of colors as fast as possible). This score reflects the cognitive cost of inhibiting the reading process. A ratio value close to 1 indicates a lesser cost of inhibition.
Measured: Stroop inhibition ratio pre-treatment
Stroop task
To measure the cost of cognitive inhibition in time, an inhibition ratio score is computed by dividing the raw score from the Stroop condition (participants have to name the color of the ink even though the word spells a different color) by the raw score in the color naming condition (participants are instructed to name rectangles of colors as fast as possible). This score reflects the cognitive cost of inhibiting the reading process. A ratio value close to 1 indicates a lesser cost of inhibition.
Measured: Stroop inhibition ratio 6 days of treatment
Stroop task
To measure the cost of cognitive inhibition in time, an inhibition ratio score is computed by dividing the raw score from the Stroop condition (participants have to name the color of the ink even though the word spells a different color) by the raw score in the color naming condition (participants are instructed to name rectangles of colors as fast as possible). This score reflects the cognitive cost of inhibiting the reading process. A ratio value close to 1 indicates a lesser cost of inhibition.
Measured: Stroop inhibition ratio one month after the end of treatment
Letter-number sequencing
A working memory subtest of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS) and the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children (WISC) in which the participant must sequence a random order of numbers and letters. Specifically, the participant must first say the numbers in ascending order and then the letters in alphabetical order. Longest sequence of letters and numbers correctly ordered
Measured: Letter-number Sequencing pre-treatment
Letter-number sequencing
A working memory subtest of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS) and the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children (WISC) in which the participant must sequence a random order of numbers and letters. Specifically, the participant must first say the numbers in ascending order and then the letters in alphabetical order. Longest sequence of letters and numbers correctly ordered
Measured: Letter-number Sequencing 6 days of treatment
Letter-number sequencing
A working memory subtest of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS) and the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children (WISC) in which the participant must sequence a random order of numbers and letters. Specifically, the participant must first say the numbers in ascending order and then the letters in alphabetical order. Longest sequence of letters and numbers correctly ordered
Measured: Letter-number Sequencing one month after the end of treatment
Color Trails test (CTT)
To measure the cost of task switching, a flexibility ratio was calculated to account for processing speed by dividing the time to complete part B (drawing a line between number following chronological order while alternating between colors) by time to complete part A (drawing a line between number following chronological order). Value closer to 1 indicate better flexibility.
Measured: CTT flexibility ratio pre-treatment
Color Trails test (CTT)
To measure the cost of task switching, a flexibility ratio was calculated to account for processing speed by dividing the time to complete part B (drawing a line between number following chronological order while alternating between colors) by time to complete part A (drawing a line between number following chronological order). Value closer to 1 indicate better flexibility.
Measured: CTT flexibility ratio 6 days of treatment
Color Trails test (CTT)
To measure the cost of task switching, a flexibility ratio was calculated to account for processing speed by dividing the time to complete part B (drawing a line between number following chronological order while alternating between colors) by time to complete part A (drawing a line between number following chronological order). Value closer to 1 indicate better flexibility.
Measured: CTT flexibility ratio one month after the end of treatment
Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery (CANTAB)
The Motor Screening test (MOT) is a training procedure designed screen for difficulties with vision, movement, or comprehension and ascertains that the subject can follow simple instructions, as well as familiarising them with the touch screen.
Intra-Extra Dimensional Set Shift (IED) is a test of rule acquisition and reversal. It features visual discrimination and attentional set formation maintenance, shifting and flexibility of attention.
Spatial Working Memory (SWM) is a test of the subject's ability to retain spatial information and to manipulate remembered items in working memory. It is a self-ordered task, which also assesses heuristic strategy.
Stop Signal Task (SST) is a classic stop signal response inhibition test, which uses staircase functions to generate an estimate of stop signal reaction time. This test gives a measure of an individual's ability to inhibit a prepotent response.
Measured: CANTAB pre-treatment
Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery (CANTAB)
The Motor Screening test (MOT) is a training procedure designed screen for difficulties with vision, movement, or comprehension and ascertains that the subject can follow simple instructions, as well as familiarising them with the touch screen.
Intra-Extra Dimensional Set Shift (IED) is a test of rule acquisition and reversal. It features visual discrimination and attentional set formation maintenance, shifting and flexibility of attention.
Spatial Working Memory (SWM) is a test of the subject's ability to retain spatial information and to manipulate remembered items in working memory. It is a self-ordered task, which also assesses heuristic strategy.
Stop Signal Task (SST) is a classic stop signal response inhibition test, which uses staircase functions to generate an estimate of stop signal reaction time. This test gives a measure of an individual's ability to inhibit a prepotent response.
Measured: CANTAB 6 days of treatment
Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery (CANTAB)
The Motor Screening test (MOT) is a training procedure designed screen for difficulties with vision, movement, or comprehension and ascertains that the subject can follow simple instructions, as well as familiarising them with the touch screen.
Intra-Extra Dimensional Set Shift (IED) is a test of rule acquisition and reversal. It features visual discrimination and attentional set formation maintenance, shifting and flexibility of attention.
Spatial Working Memory (SWM) is a test of the subject's ability to retain spatial information and to manipulate remembered items in working memory. It is a self-ordered task, which also assesses heuristic strategy.
Stop Signal Task (SST) is a classic stop signal response inhibition test, which uses staircase functions to generate an estimate of stop signal reaction time. This test gives a measure of an individual's ability to inhibit a prepotent response.
Measured: CANTAB one month after the end of treatment
15 signes & 15 words
15 signs \& 15 words is a homemade episodic memory task inspired by the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (Rey, 1958). Participants are required to learn 15 common French words and 15 signs (drawings made out of 1 or 2 basic geometrical forms). After delays of thirty minutes, one day, one week and one month, participants are asked to freely recall the words and the signs they remembered. They are also asked to recognize the target items form a list of distractors. Variables of interest are (1) learning score = Maximum number of items correctly recalled during learning divided by the number of trials to reach learning criterion. Low score indicates poor learning. (2) Retention % thirty minutes/on day/one week = Number of items recalled after each delay in time divided by the maximum of items recalled during learning. Low score indicates poor memory.
Measured: 15 signes & 15 words pre-treatment
15 signes & 15 words
15 signs \& 15 words is a homemade episodic memory task inspired by the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (Rey, 1958). Participants are required to learn 15 common French words and 15 signs (drawings made out of 1 or 2 basic geometrical forms). After delays of thirty minutes, one day, one week and one month, participants are asked to freely recall the words and the signs they remembered. They are also asked to recognize the target items form a list of distractors. Variables of interest are (1) learning score = Maximum number of items correctly recalled during learning divided by the number of trials to reach learning criterion. Low score indicates poor learning. (2) Retention % thirty minutes/on day/one week = Number of items recalled after each delay in time divided by the maximum of items recalled during learning. Low score indicates poor memory.
Measured: 15 signes & 15 words 6 days of treatment
15 signes & 15 words
15 signs \& 15 words is a homemade episodic memory task inspired by the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (Rey, 1958). Participants are required to learn 15 common French words and 15 signs (drawings made out of 1 or 2 basic geometrical forms). After delays of thirty minutes, one day, one week and one month, participants are asked to freely recall the words and the signs they remembered. They are also asked to recognize the target items form a list of distractors. Variables of interest are (1) learning score = Maximum number of items correctly recalled during learning divided by the number of trials to reach learning criterion. Low score indicates poor learning. (2) Retention % thirty minutes/on day/one week = Number of items recalled after each delay in time divided by the maximum of items recalled during learning. Low score indicates poor memory.
Measured: 15 signes & 15 words one month after the end of treatment
ADHD symptoms
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders - fifth edition (DSM-V)
Measured: ADHD symptoms pre-treatment
ADHD symptoms
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders - fifth edition (DSM-V)
Measured: ADHD symptoms 13 days of treatment
ADHD symptoms
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders - fifth edition (DSM-V)
Measured: ADHD symptoms one month after the end of treatment
Secondary outcomes (24)
Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) T1-weighted
T1 structural images are collected to obtain accurate measurements of regional developmental changes in cortical morphometry comprising estimates of cortical volume, thickness and surface area. An MPRAGE T1-weighted sequence is employed with the following parameters: TR = 2500 ms, TE = 3 ms, flip angle = 8°, matrix acquisition = 256 × 256, field of view = 23.5 cm, slice thickness = 3.2 mm, 192 slices.
Measured: MRI T1-weighted pre-treatment
Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) T1-weighted
T1 structural images are collected to obtain accurate measurements of regional developmental changes in cortical morphometry comprising estimates of cortical volume, thickness and surface area. An MPRAGE T1-weighted sequence is employed with the following parameters: TR = 2500 ms, TE = 3 ms, flip angle = 8°, matrix acquisition = 256 × 256, field of view = 23.5 cm, slice thickness = 3.2 mm, 192 slices.
Measured: MRI T1-weighted 6 days of treatment
Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) T1-weighted
T1 structural images are collected to obtain accurate measurements of regional developmental changes in cortical morphometry comprising estimates of cortical volume, thickness and surface area. An MPRAGE T1-weighted sequence is employed with the following parameters: TR = 2500 ms, TE = 3 ms, flip angle = 8°, matrix acquisition = 256 × 256, field of view = 23.5 cm, slice thickness = 3.2 mm, 192 slices.
Measured: MRI T1-weighted one month after the end of treatment
MRI Spectroscopy
Acquisition of Single-voxel MRI Spectroscopy investigates changes in excitatory/inhibitory balance throughout development. More in detail, a Works-In-Progress (WIP) SVS (Single Voxel Spectroscopy) spin-echo sequence is used provided by Siemens and designed for detecting the GABA (Gamma-AminoButyric Acid) 1H MRS signal at 3 ppm in brain. 3 ROIs are selected: Anterior cingulate cortex (voxel size: 15 x 35 x 40, 98 avg), right hippocampus (voxel size: 20 x 30 x 40, 150 avg) and temporal cortex (voxel size: 30 x 30 x 30, 120 avg) that are manually placed during each session. Each sequence lasts around 7 minutes and patients are allowed to watch a video of their choice during the acquisition.
Measured: MRI Spectroscopy pre-treatment
MRI Spectroscopy
Acquisition of Single-voxel MRI Spectroscopy investigates changes in excitatory/inhibitory balance throughout development. More in detail, a Works-In-Progress (WIP) SVS (Single Voxel Spectroscopy) spin-echo sequence is used provided by Siemens and designed for detecting the GABA (Gamma-AminoButyric Acid) 1H MRS signal at 3 ppm in brain. 3 ROIs are selected: Anterior cingulate cortex (voxel size: 15 x 35 x 40, 98 avg), right hippocampus (voxel size: 20 x 30 x 40, 150 avg) and temporal cortex (voxel size: 30 x 30 x 30, 120 avg) that are manually placed during each session. Each sequence lasts around 7 minutes and patients are allowed to watch a video of their choice during the acquisition.
Measured: MRI Spectroscopy 6 days of treatment
MRI Spectroscopy
Acquisition of Single-voxel MRI Spectroscopy investigates changes in excitatory/inhibitory balance throughout development. More in detail, a Works-In-Progress (WIP) SVS (Single Voxel Spectroscopy) spin-echo sequence is used provided by Siemens and designed for detecting the GABA (Gamma-AminoButyric Acid) 1H MRS signal at 3 ppm in brain. 3 ROIs are selected: Anterior cingulate cortex (voxel size: 15 x 35 x 40, 98 avg), right hippocampus (voxel size: 20 x 30 x 40, 150 avg) and temporal cortex (voxel size: 30 x 30 x 30, 120 avg) that are manually placed during each session. Each sequence lasts around 7 minutes and patients are allowed to watch a video of their choice during the acquisition.
Measured: MRI Spectroscopy one month after the end of treatment
MRI Resting State
Functional MRI sequence without stimulation (resting-state fMRI) scans are employed to assess the longitudinal changes in regional activity and functional connectivity measured by BOLD signal fluctuations. During this sequence, the participants are asked to fix a white cross on a black background for 8 minutes and leave their thoughts wander. Simultaneous recording of physiological parameters (heart rate and respiration) are employed to account for possible artifacts. (Parameters: 200 blood-oxygenation-level-dependent (BOLD) images with TR = 2400 ms, TE = 30 ms, 38 axial slices, slice thickness = 3.2 mm, flip angle = 85°, acquisition matrix = 94 × 128, field of view = 96 × 128).
Measured: MRI resting state pre-treatment
MRI Resting State
Functional MRI sequence without stimulation (resting-state fMRI) scans are employed to assess the longitudinal changes in regional activity and functional connectivity measured by BOLD signal fluctuations. During this sequence, the participants are asked to fix a white cross on a black background for 8 minutes and leave their thoughts wander. Simultaneous recording of physiological parameters (heart rate and respiration) are employed to account for possible artifacts. (Parameters: 200 blood-oxygenation-level-dependent (BOLD) images with TR = 2400 ms, TE = 30 ms, 38 axial slices, slice thickness = 3.2 mm, flip angle = 85°, acquisition matrix = 94 × 128, field of view = 96 × 128).
Measured: MRI resting state 6 days of treatment
MRI Resting State
Functional MRI sequence without stimulation (resting-state fMRI) scans are employed to assess the longitudinal changes in regional activity and functional connectivity measured by BOLD signal fluctuations. During this sequence, the participants are asked to fix a white cross on a black background for 8 minutes and leave their thoughts wander. Simultaneous recording of physiological parameters (heart rate and respiration) are employed to account for possible artifacts. (Parameters: 200 blood-oxygenation-level-dependent (BOLD) images with TR = 2400 ms, TE = 30 ms, 38 axial slices, slice thickness = 3.2 mm, flip angle = 85°, acquisition matrix = 94 × 128, field of view = 96 × 128).
Measured: MRI resting state one month after the end of treatment
MRI Diffusion weighted images
Diffusion weighted images (DWI) are acquired to examine the longitudinal changes in white matter integrity and to quantify changes in tracts connecting a priori defined regions of interest. The patient would be warned about a slightly louder sequence sound and will be asked to watch their preferred video or closes their eyes and relax during this last sequence.
DSI parameters are number of directions = 137, b = 3000 s/mm2, TR = 5100 ms, TE = 80 ms, Voxel size= 1.6x1.6x1.6, field of view = 23.9 cm, 64 axial slices, slice thickness = 1.6 mm.
Measured: MRI DSI pre-treatment
MRI Diffusion weighted images
Diffusion weighted images (DWI) are acquired to examine the longitudinal changes in white matter integrity and to quantify changes in tracts connecting a priori defined regions of interest. The patient would be warned about a slightly louder sequence sound and will be asked to watch their preferred video or closes their eyes and relax during this last sequence.
DSI parameters are number of directions = 137, b = 3000 s/mm2, TR = 5100 ms, TE = 80 ms, Voxel size= 1.6x1.6x1.6, field of view = 23.9 cm, 64 axial slices, slice thickness = 1.6 mm.
Measured: MRI DSI 6 days of treatment
MRI Diffusion weighted images
Diffusion weighted images (DWI) are acquired to examine the longitudinal changes in white matter integrity and to quantify changes in tracts connecting a priori defined regions of interest. The patient would be warned about a slightly louder sequence sound and will be asked to watch their preferred video or closes their eyes and relax during this last sequence.
DSI parameters are number of directions = 137, b = 3000 s/mm2, TR = 5100 ms, TE = 80 ms, Voxel size= 1.6x1.6x1.6, field of view = 23.9 cm, 64 axial slices, slice thickness = 1.6 mm.
Measured: MRI DSI one month after the end of treatment
Electroencephalography (EEG) resting state
All the EEG data are continuously recorded with a sampling rate of 1000 Hz using a 256-electrode Hydrocel cap referenced to the vertex (Cz). Resting-state data with closed eyes is acquired for 6 minutes.
Measured: EEG resting state pre-treatment
Electroencephalography (EEG) resting state
All the EEG data are continuously recorded with a sampling rate of 1000 Hz using a 256-electrode Hydrocel cap referenced to the vertex (Cz). Resting-state data with closed eyes is acquired for 6 minutes.
Measured: EEG resting state 6 days of treatment
Electroencephalography (EEG) resting state
All the EEG data are continuously recorded with a sampling rate of 1000 Hz using a 256-electrode Hydrocel cap referenced to the vertex (Cz). Resting-state data with closed eyes is acquired for 6 minutes.
Measured: EEG resting state one month after the end of treatment
EEG auditory
Auditory steady state response paradigm: sequences of 2 types of auditory stimuli are presented binaurally: a 100 ripple tones (40 Hz) and 10 semi-randomly intermixed flat tones (1000 Hz). Ripple tones are presented at about 93 dB and the flat tones at about 83 dB. Participants are asked to detect the flat tone, while the ripple tones entrained the neural gamma oscillatory response. The duration of the task is around 7 minutes.
Measured: EEG Auditory pre-treatment
EEG auditory
Auditory steady state response paradigm: sequences of 2 types of auditory stimuli are presented binaurally: a 100 ripple tones (40 Hz) and 10 semi-randomly intermixed flat tones (1000 Hz). Ripple tones are presented at about 93 dB and the flat tones at about 83 dB. Participants are asked to detect the flat tone, while the ripple tones entrained the neural gamma oscillatory response. The duration of the task is around 7 minutes.
Measured: EEG Auditory 6 days of treatment
EEG auditory
Auditory steady state response paradigm: sequences of 2 types of auditory stimuli are presented binaurally: a 100 ripple tones (40 Hz) and 10 semi-randomly intermixed flat tones (1000 Hz). Ripple tones are presented at about 93 dB and the flat tones at about 83 dB. Participants are asked to detect the flat tone, while the ripple tones entrained the neural gamma oscillatory response. The duration of the task is around 7 minutes.
Measured: EEG Auditory one month after the end of treatment
EEG visual
Visual inward moving grating task paradigm: participants are presented with 3 blocks of 80 trials, with each trial consisting of a circular sinewave grating that contracted toward central fixation. The task of the participants is to detect and respond by button press to a velocity increase of the stimulus, randomly occurring between 750 and 3000 ms. Feedback on performance is provided on every trial, shortly after the response onset terminated stimulus presentation. The duration of the task is around 21 minutes in 3 blocks.
Measured: EEG Visual pre-treatment
EEG visual
Visual inward moving grating task paradigm: participants are presented with 3 blocks of 80 trials, with each trial consisting of a circular sinewave grating that contracted toward central fixation. The task of the participants is to detect and respond by button press to a velocity increase of the stimulus, randomly occurring between 750 and 3000 ms. Feedback on performance is provided on every trial, shortly after the response onset terminated stimulus presentation. The duration of the task is around 21 minutes in 3 blocks.
Measured: EEG Visual 6 days of treatment
EEG visual
Visual inward moving grating task paradigm: participants are presented with 3 blocks of 80 trials, with each trial consisting of a circular sinewave grating that contracted toward central fixation. The task of the participants is to detect and respond by button press to a velocity increase of the stimulus, randomly occurring between 750 and 3000 ms. Feedback on performance is provided on every trial, shortly after the response onset terminated stimulus presentation. The duration of the task is around 21 minutes in 3 blocks.
Measured: EEG Visual one month after the end of treatment
Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF) questionnaire
Children and Adults version. This questionnaire provides an ecological assessment of EF, with a Global Executive Composite (GEC) score derived from the Behavioral Regulation Index (BRI) and Metacognitive Index (MI). The BRI includes subscales of Inhibition, Shifting, Emotional regulation and only in the adult-form, Self- monitoring. The MI includes subscales of Initiation, Working memory, Planning, Organization and Monitoring. Observations are reported using standardized scores (T-scores)
Measured: BRIEF pre-treatment
Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF) questionnaire
Children and Adults version. This questionnaire provides an ecological assessment of EF, with a Global Executive Composite (GEC) score derived from the Behavioral Regulation Index (BRI) and Metacognitive Index (MI). The BRI includes subscales of Inhibition, Shifting, Emotional regulation and only in the adult-form, Self- monitoring. The MI includes subscales of Initiation, Working memory, Planning, Organization and Monitoring. Observations are reported using standardized scores (T-scores)
Measured: BRIEF 13 days of treatment
Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF) questionnaire
Children and Adults version. This questionnaire provides an ecological assessment of EF, with a Global Executive Composite (GEC) score derived from the Behavioral Regulation Index (BRI) and Metacognitive Index (MI). The BRI includes subscales of Inhibition, Shifting, Emotional regulation and only in the adult-form, Self- monitoring. The MI includes subscales of Initiation, Working memory, Planning, Organization and Monitoring. Observations are reported using standardized scores (T-scores)
Measured: BRIEF one month after the end of treatment
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted1 Dec 2020
- Study start26 Aug 2016
- Primary completion26 Sep 2022
- Study completion26 Sep 2022
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for 22q11.2 Deletion SyndromeStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Depending on medication history and current psychostimulant medication, participants are included either in the consumer group (composed of participants with ongoing methylphenidate treatment) or in the naïve group (composed of participants naïve to the molecule)
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 45 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Geneva, Switzerland
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Stephan Eliez, University of Geneva, Switzerland
- Investigators
- Stephan Eliez, Professor, Principal investigator, University of Geneva, faculty of medicine
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04647500
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- PB_201601472
- Status last verified
- Oct 2022
- First submitted
- 3 Nov 2020
- Last updated
- 7 Oct 2022
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 7 Oct 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Effects of Modulation of the Dopaminergic System Using Methylphenidate on Memory and Executive Processes in Individuals With 22q11.2 Deletion Syndrome
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04647500
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- PB_201601472
- Conditions
- 22q11.2 Deletion Syndrome
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 45 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of Geneva, SwitzerlandUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 26 Aug 2016 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 26 Sep 2022 (actual)
- Study completion
- 26 Sep 2022 (actual)
- First posted
- 1 Dec 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Chromosome 22q11.2 deletion syndrome (22q11DS) is a neurogenetic condition associated with a high risk of psychiatric disorders, including schizophrenia spectrum disorders. This population is characterized by a specific neurocognitive profile and atypical brain development. Methylphenidate is a psychostimulant used in the treatment of attention deficit with/without hyperactivity (ADHD). Although ADHD is one of the most important co-morbidities in 22q11DS, affecting 35-45% of patients, to date only two studies have focused on quantifying the efficacy of this treatment in this population. The objective of this study is to quantify the improvement in cognitive performance as well as the differences in brain connectivity associated with the methylphenidate molecule in a population at risk of cognitive impairment and the development of schizophrenia.
Detailed description
This study aimed to investigate the effects of methylphenidate (Concerta ®) in patients with 22q11DS. Outcome is evaluated based on changes in clinical and cognitive measures as well as brain connectivity (with magnetic resonance imaging and electroencephalography). Treatment benefits are evaluated in an intra-subject design, i.e. performance with/without treatment are compared for each patient. Depending on medication history and current psychostimulant medication, participants are included either in the consumer group (composed of participants with ongoing methylphenidate treatment) or in the naïve group (composed of participants naïve to the molecule). To the naive participants the investigators prescribe a 13-day treatment of Concerta ® at a weight-adjusted dose of 0.7 mg/kg). The treatment phase begins with a lower introductory dose for the first 5 days before moving on to the weight-adjusted dose. The effect of treatment on cognitive measures is assessed on day 6, with memory monitoring on days 7 and 13. The treatment effect evaluated using clinical measures and questionnaires was conducted at the end of the treatment phase to ensure multiple opportunities for observation by the participant and caregivers. For consumer participants, the procedure was similar. For visits with methylphenidate, participants will be asked to take their usual prescription. In order to best follow the procedure of the naïve group, for the visits without methylphenidate, the consumer participants were asked to interrupt their usual prescription for 13 days. Since many participants usually interrupt their treatment during vacations or sometimes on weekends, compliance is not a barrier. For methylphenidate-free visits, a 5-day break prior to assessment with cognitive measures will be requested from each participant. Again, in order to ensure several opportunities for observation for the participant and caregivers, assessments with clinical measures and questionnaires will be conducted at the end of the break, on day 13.
The research hypothesis of this study is that methylphenidate treatment has a beneficial effect on clinical and cognitive performance. Scores in the tests evaluating these areas are expected to be significantly better than when the tests were administered in the absence of the substance. A change in brain connectivity is also expected when the drug is taken, tending towards a "normalization" of brain connectivity. Finally, to find the link between changes in cognitive measures and changes in brain connectivity is investigated.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Depending on medication history and current psychostimulant medication, participants are included either in the consumer group (composed of participants with ongoing methylphenidate treatment) or in the naïve group (composed of participants naïve to the molecule)
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| 22q11DS naive | Other | Drug: Concerta22q11DS participants naive to methylphenidate |
| 22q11DS consumer | Other | Drug: Concerta22q11DS participants with a prolonged treatment of methylphenidate |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 8 to 25 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Male or female with confirmed 22q11DS diagnosis.
- Minimum age of 8 years or maximum age of 25 years and 11 months.
- Attention difficulties pointed out by parents and/or the participant.
- Sufficient verbal expression and comprehension skills to understand and follow instructions based on initial interview.
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Participants younger than 8 years and older that 25 years and 11 months.
- Previous adverse experience with MPH
- Cardio-vascular diseases including rhythm disorders, severe hypertension, cardiac insufficiency, obliterating cardiac and peripheral arterial disease, preexisting cerebrovascular affections, hemodynamically significant congenital heart defect, channelopathies.
- For the naïve group only: corrected QT (QTc) distance at baseline electrocardiogram above 460 milliseconds or elongation at control electrocardiogram (Day 6 of treatment) superior to 30 milliseconds with functional complaint.
- Psychiatric affections including anxiety attack, psychic tension or restlessness, manic episode, marked psychotic symptoms, schizophrenia, borderline personality disorder, clinical depression (present or past), suicidal episode, diagnosis or family history of Tourette syndrome, alcohol or drug abuse.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| ConcertaEvaluation of a treatment of Concerta over a period of 13 days. | Drug | 22q11DS consumer, 22q11DS naive |
Primary outcome
Conners' Continuous performance test, third edition (CPT-3)
Time frame: CPT-3 pre-treatment
Participants are instructed to press a button every time a letter appeared on the screen, except for the letter X where participants had to withhold their answer. Variables of interest are Detectability, Omission, Commission, Perseveration, Hit Reaction Time, Hit Reaction time Standard Deviation, Variability, Hit Reaction Time Block Change and Hit Reaction Time Inter- Stimulus Intervals Change.
Conners' Continuous performance test, third edition (CPT-3)
Time frame: CPT-3 6 days of treatment
Participants are instructed to press a button every time a letter appeared on the screen, except for the letter X where participants had to withhold their answer. Variables of interest are Detectability, Omission, Commission, Perseveration, Hit Reaction Time, Hit Reaction time Standard Deviation, Variability, Hit Reaction Time Block Change and Hit Reaction Time Inter- Stimulus Intervals Change.
Conners' Continuous performance test, third edition (CPT-3)
Time frame: CPT-3 one month after the end of treatment
Participants are instructed to press a button every time a letter appeared on the screen, except for the letter X where participants had to withhold their answer. Variables of interest are Detectability, Omission, Commission, Perseveration, Hit Reaction Time, Hit Reaction time Standard Deviation, Variability, Hit Reaction Time Block Change and Hit Reaction Time Inter- Stimulus Intervals Change.
Stroop task
Time frame: Stroop inhibition ratio pre-treatment
To measure the cost of cognitive inhibition in time, an inhibition ratio score is computed by dividing the raw score from the Stroop condition (participants have to name the color of the ink even though the word spells a different color) by the raw score in the color naming condition (participants are instructed to name rectangles of colors as fast as possible). This score reflects the cognitive cost of inhibiting the reading process. A ratio value close to 1 indicates a lesser cost of inhibition.
Stroop task
Time frame: Stroop inhibition ratio 6 days of treatment
To measure the cost of cognitive inhibition in time, an inhibition ratio score is computed by dividing the raw score from the Stroop condition (participants have to name the color of the ink even though the word spells a different color) by the raw score in the color naming condition (participants are instructed to name rectangles of colors as fast as possible). This score reflects the cognitive cost of inhibiting the reading process. A ratio value close to 1 indicates a lesser cost of inhibition.
Stroop task
Time frame: Stroop inhibition ratio one month after the end of treatment
To measure the cost of cognitive inhibition in time, an inhibition ratio score is computed by dividing the raw score from the Stroop condition (participants have to name the color of the ink even though the word spells a different color) by the raw score in the color naming condition (participants are instructed to name rectangles of colors as fast as possible). This score reflects the cognitive cost of inhibiting the reading process. A ratio value close to 1 indicates a lesser cost of inhibition.
Letter-number sequencing
Time frame: Letter-number Sequencing pre-treatment
A working memory subtest of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS) and the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children (WISC) in which the participant must sequence a random order of numbers and letters. Specifically, the participant must first say the numbers in ascending order and then the letters in alphabetical order. Longest sequence of letters and numbers correctly ordered
Letter-number sequencing
Time frame: Letter-number Sequencing 6 days of treatment
A working memory subtest of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS) and the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children (WISC) in which the participant must sequence a random order of numbers and letters. Specifically, the participant must first say the numbers in ascending order and then the letters in alphabetical order. Longest sequence of letters and numbers correctly ordered
Letter-number sequencing
Time frame: Letter-number Sequencing one month after the end of treatment
A working memory subtest of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS) and the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children (WISC) in which the participant must sequence a random order of numbers and letters. Specifically, the participant must first say the numbers in ascending order and then the letters in alphabetical order. Longest sequence of letters and numbers correctly ordered
Color Trails test (CTT)
Time frame: CTT flexibility ratio pre-treatment
To measure the cost of task switching, a flexibility ratio was calculated to account for processing speed by dividing the time to complete part B (drawing a line between number following chronological order while alternating between colors) by time to complete part A (drawing a line between number following chronological order). Value closer to 1 indicate better flexibility.
Color Trails test (CTT)
Time frame: CTT flexibility ratio 6 days of treatment
To measure the cost of task switching, a flexibility ratio was calculated to account for processing speed by dividing the time to complete part B (drawing a line between number following chronological order while alternating between colors) by time to complete part A (drawing a line between number following chronological order). Value closer to 1 indicate better flexibility.
Color Trails test (CTT)
Time frame: CTT flexibility ratio one month after the end of treatment
To measure the cost of task switching, a flexibility ratio was calculated to account for processing speed by dividing the time to complete part B (drawing a line between number following chronological order while alternating between colors) by time to complete part A (drawing a line between number following chronological order). Value closer to 1 indicate better flexibility.
Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery (CANTAB)
Time frame: CANTAB pre-treatment
The Motor Screening test (MOT) is a training procedure designed screen for difficulties with vision, movement, or comprehension and ascertains that the subject can follow simple instructions, as well as familiarising them with the touch screen. Intra-Extra Dimensional Set Shift (IED) is a test of rule acquisition and reversal. It features visual discrimination and attentional set formation maintenance, shifting and flexibility of attention. Spatial Working Memory (SWM) is a test of the subject's ability to retain spatial information and to manipulate remembered items in working memory. It is a self-ordered task, which also assesses heuristic strategy. Stop Signal Task (SST) is a classic stop signal response inhibition test, which uses staircase functions to generate an estimate of stop signal reaction time. This test gives a measure of an individual's ability to inhibit a prepotent response.
Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery (CANTAB)
Time frame: CANTAB 6 days of treatment
The Motor Screening test (MOT) is a training procedure designed screen for difficulties with vision, movement, or comprehension and ascertains that the subject can follow simple instructions, as well as familiarising them with the touch screen. Intra-Extra Dimensional Set Shift (IED) is a test of rule acquisition and reversal. It features visual discrimination and attentional set formation maintenance, shifting and flexibility of attention. Spatial Working Memory (SWM) is a test of the subject's ability to retain spatial information and to manipulate remembered items in working memory. It is a self-ordered task, which also assesses heuristic strategy. Stop Signal Task (SST) is a classic stop signal response inhibition test, which uses staircase functions to generate an estimate of stop signal reaction time. This test gives a measure of an individual's ability to inhibit a prepotent response.
Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery (CANTAB)
Time frame: CANTAB one month after the end of treatment
The Motor Screening test (MOT) is a training procedure designed screen for difficulties with vision, movement, or comprehension and ascertains that the subject can follow simple instructions, as well as familiarising them with the touch screen. Intra-Extra Dimensional Set Shift (IED) is a test of rule acquisition and reversal. It features visual discrimination and attentional set formation maintenance, shifting and flexibility of attention. Spatial Working Memory (SWM) is a test of the subject's ability to retain spatial information and to manipulate remembered items in working memory. It is a self-ordered task, which also assesses heuristic strategy. Stop Signal Task (SST) is a classic stop signal response inhibition test, which uses staircase functions to generate an estimate of stop signal reaction time. This test gives a measure of an individual's ability to inhibit a prepotent response.
15 signes & 15 words
Time frame: 15 signes & 15 words pre-treatment
15 signs \& 15 words is a homemade episodic memory task inspired by the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (Rey, 1958). Participants are required to learn 15 common French words and 15 signs (drawings made out of 1 or 2 basic geometrical forms). After delays of thirty minutes, one day, one week and one month, participants are asked to freely recall the words and the signs they remembered. They are also asked to recognize the target items form a list of distractors. Variables of interest are (1) learning score = Maximum number of items correctly recalled during learning divided by the number of trials to reach learning criterion. Low score indicates poor learning. (2) Retention % thirty minutes/on day/one week = Number of items recalled after each delay in time divided by the maximum of items recalled during learning. Low score indicates poor memory.
15 signes & 15 words
Time frame: 15 signes & 15 words 6 days of treatment
15 signs \& 15 words is a homemade episodic memory task inspired by the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (Rey, 1958). Participants are required to learn 15 common French words and 15 signs (drawings made out of 1 or 2 basic geometrical forms). After delays of thirty minutes, one day, one week and one month, participants are asked to freely recall the words and the signs they remembered. They are also asked to recognize the target items form a list of distractors. Variables of interest are (1) learning score = Maximum number of items correctly recalled during learning divided by the number of trials to reach learning criterion. Low score indicates poor learning. (2) Retention % thirty minutes/on day/one week = Number of items recalled after each delay in time divided by the maximum of items recalled during learning. Low score indicates poor memory.
15 signes & 15 words
Time frame: 15 signes & 15 words one month after the end of treatment
15 signs \& 15 words is a homemade episodic memory task inspired by the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (Rey, 1958). Participants are required to learn 15 common French words and 15 signs (drawings made out of 1 or 2 basic geometrical forms). After delays of thirty minutes, one day, one week and one month, participants are asked to freely recall the words and the signs they remembered. They are also asked to recognize the target items form a list of distractors. Variables of interest are (1) learning score = Maximum number of items correctly recalled during learning divided by the number of trials to reach learning criterion. Low score indicates poor learning. (2) Retention % thirty minutes/on day/one week = Number of items recalled after each delay in time divided by the maximum of items recalled during learning. Low score indicates poor memory.
ADHD symptoms
Time frame: ADHD symptoms pre-treatment
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders - fifth edition (DSM-V)
ADHD symptoms
Time frame: ADHD symptoms 13 days of treatment
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders - fifth edition (DSM-V)
ADHD symptoms
Time frame: ADHD symptoms one month after the end of treatment
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders - fifth edition (DSM-V)
24 secondary outcomes
Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) T1-weighted
Time frame: MRI T1-weighted pre-treatment
Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) T1-weighted
Time frame: MRI T1-weighted 6 days of treatment
Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) T1-weighted
Time frame: MRI T1-weighted one month after the end of treatment
MRI Spectroscopy
Time frame: MRI Spectroscopy pre-treatment
MRI Spectroscopy
Time frame: MRI Spectroscopy 6 days of treatment
MRI Spectroscopy
Time frame: MRI Spectroscopy one month after the end of treatment
MRI Resting State
Time frame: MRI resting state pre-treatment
MRI Resting State
Time frame: MRI resting state 6 days of treatment
MRI Resting State
Time frame: MRI resting state one month after the end of treatment
MRI Diffusion weighted images
Time frame: MRI DSI pre-treatment
MRI Diffusion weighted images
Time frame: MRI DSI 6 days of treatment
MRI Diffusion weighted images
Time frame: MRI DSI one month after the end of treatment
Electroencephalography (EEG) resting state
Time frame: EEG resting state pre-treatment
Electroencephalography (EEG) resting state
Time frame: EEG resting state 6 days of treatment
Electroencephalography (EEG) resting state
Time frame: EEG resting state one month after the end of treatment
EEG auditory
Time frame: EEG Auditory pre-treatment
EEG auditory
Time frame: EEG Auditory 6 days of treatment
EEG auditory
Time frame: EEG Auditory one month after the end of treatment
EEG visual
Time frame: EEG Visual pre-treatment
EEG visual
Time frame: EEG Visual 6 days of treatment
EEG visual
Time frame: EEG Visual one month after the end of treatment
Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF) questionnaire
Time frame: BRIEF pre-treatment
Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF) questionnaire
Time frame: BRIEF 13 days of treatment
Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF) questionnaire
Time frame: BRIEF one month after the end of treatment
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 7 Oct 2022.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for 22q11.2 Deletion Syndrome
RecruitingObservational study
The ADVANCE (Assay Development and Validation for Pre-Natal and Obstetric Conditions) Study is the Largest U.S.-Based Prospective Study Demonstrating a Circulating Fetal Cell (CFC) Based Approach to Non-invasive Fetal Risk Assessment
Pregnant Individuals, Aneuploidy
RecruitingObservational study
Examining Genetic Factors That Affect the Severity of 22q11.2 Deletion Syndrome
DiGeorge Syndrome, 22q11.2 Deletion Syndrome
RecruitingPhase 2
Sertraline vs. Placebo in the Treatment of Anxiety in Children and AdoLescents With NeurodevelopMental Disorders
Neurodevelopmental Disorders, Autism
Enrolling by invitation
Parent and Infant Inter(X)Action Intervention (PIXI)
Fragile X Syndrome, Angelman Syndrome
RecruitingPhase 2
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (HSCT) for Common Variable Immunodeficiency (CVID) and Other Autoimmune Manifestations of Primary Immune Regulatory Disorders (PIRD)
Common Variable Immunodeficiency (CVID), Primary Immune Regulatory Disorder
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Stephan Eliez, Professor principal investigator
University of Geneva, faculty of medicine
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Concerta in people with 22q11.2 Deletion Syndrome, run by University of Geneva, Switzerland at 1 site in Switzerland.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 Oct 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Switzerland. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Conners' Continuous performance test, third edition (CPT-3) (time frame: CPT-3 pre-treatment). The study lists 21 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 Oct 2022.