AzTrials
AzTrials

Tracheostomy ComplicationTRACHNCT04647968

Primary vs Secondary Closure of Tracheo-cutaneous Fistulas

A study testing Primary closure of tracheo-cutaneous fistula and Secondary closure of tracheo-cutaneous fistula in people with Tracheostomy Complication and Post Tracheostomy Complications, run by Université de Sherbrooke at 1 site in Canada.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The mean of this study is to compare primary and secondary closure of tracheo-cutaneous fistulas and evaluate the differences in outcomes between both techniques. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
What is being tested?
Primary closure of tracheo-cutaneous fistula and Secondary closure of tracheo-cutaneous fistula
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
44 participants
Where
1 siteCanada
Study dates
12 Jan 2021to Jul 2026
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Being covered by the RAMQ
  • Having a tracheostomy either percutaneous or surgical
  • Being ready for canula removal and closure of the fistula

Who cannot join

  • Presenting a contraindication to primary tracheotomy closure (granuloma)
  • Unable to consent
  • Refusal to participate

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Canada1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Centre hospitalier universitaire de Sherbrooke

    Sherbrooke, Quebec, J1G 2E8

    Simon Brisebois, MD MSc, 819-346-1110 ext. 14901, simon.brisebois@usherbrooke.ca

    Adnan Busuladzic, MD, 819-346-1110 ext. 14901, adnan.busuladzic@usherbrooke.ca

    Recruiting

Other trials in Canada

About this study

Official title: Primary vs Secondary Closure of Tracheo-cutaneous Fistulas: A Randomized Controlled Study

The mean of this study is to compare primary and secondary closure of tracheo-cutaneous fistulas and evaluate the differences in outcomes between both techniques.

Read the detailed description

In this study the investigators wish to recruit patients with a tracheotomy that has been installed for various reasons and that is ready for closure. The investigators intend to randomly allocate them a mean of closure, either primary or secondary. Once the fistula is closed, the investigators will follow them over a substantial period of time to compare outcomes of each mean of closing. Different questionnaires will be used to best evaluate a range of variables.

Being tested
Primary closure of tracheo-cutaneous fistula, Secondary closure of tracheo-cutaneous fistula
Keywords
tracheostomy, tracheostomy closure, tracheocutaneous fistula

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Primary closure of tracheo-cutaneous fistulaProcedure or surgery

    This procedure will follow protocoled steps. It consists of a sutured closure of the tracheotomy following local anesthesia, done at bedside.

  • Secondary closure of tracheo-cutaneous fistulaProcedure or surgery

    This procedure will follow protocoled steps. It consists of removing the tracheotomy canula and applying ointment and an Elastoplast on the site, which will be changed regularly until full healing of the wound.

Study groups in NCT04647968
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Primary closure of tracheo-cutaneous fistulaOtherThis group will undergo a protocoled primary closure of their tracheotomy.
Receives: Procedure: Primary closure of tracheo-cutaneous fistula
Secondary closure of tracheo-cutaneous fistulaOtherThis group will undergo a protocoled secondary closure of their tracheotomy.
Receives: Procedure: Secondary closure of tracheo-cutaneous fistula

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Patient satisfaction in regards to the scar (change)

    This outcome will evaluate patient satisfaction in regards to his tracheotomy scar following closure, measured with the Patient observer scar assesment scale (POSAS) validated questionnaire. A high score means a worse outcome.

    Measured: 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months

Secondary outcomes (6)
  1. Healing time

    This outcome will evaluate time until full closure of the wound using both methods of closure.

    Measured: 6 months

  2. Respiratory complications

    The investigators wish to establish whether there is a difference in respiratory complications occurence between the two means of closure.

    Measured: 6 months

  3. Self reported quality of life related to dysphonia (change)

    The goal of this outcome is to evaluate the self reported quality of life of patients following tracheotomy closed by either mean. The investigators are going to use the Voice Handicap Index (VHI-10) validated questionnaire to better assess this outcome. A high score means a worse outcome, the highest score being 40.

    Measured: 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months

  4. Persisting fistula

    This outcome intends to evaluate the frequency of persisting fistula using either method of closure.

    Measured: 6 months

  5. Self reported quality of life related to dysphagia (change)

    The goal of this outcome is to evaluate the self reported quality of life of patients following tracheotomy closed by either mean. We are going to use the EAT-10 validated questionnaire to better assess this outcome. A high score means a worse outcome, the highest score being 40.

    Measured: 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months

  6. Self reported quality of life related to dyspnea (change)

    The goal of this outcome is to evaluate the self reported quality of life of patients following tracheotomy closed by either mean. This will be measure by the Dyspnea Index (DI) validated questionnaire but also with the follow-up history. The Dyspnea Index questionnaire has a maximum score of 40. A high score means a worse outcome.

    Measured: 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted1 Dec 2020
  2. Study start12 Jan 2021
  3. Primary completionJan 2026 (estimated)
  4. Study completionJul 2026 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Randomized Controlled Trial
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
44 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04647968
Sponsor's protocol ID
2021-3699
Acronym
TRACH
Status last verified
Jul 2024
First submitted
12 Nov 2020
Last updated
23 Jul 2024
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Primary closure of tracheo-cutaneous fistula and Secondary closure of tracheo-cutaneous fistula in people with Tracheostomy Complication and Post Tracheostomy Complications, run by Université de Sherbrooke at 1 site in Canada.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Jul 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Simon Brisebois, MD, MSC (8193461110 ext. 24947, simon.brisebois@usherbrooke.ca), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Patient satisfaction in regards to the scar (change) (time frame: 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Jul 2024.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in