DepressionPhase 1/2SSTEP-HVNCT04652089
7-day Simvastatin and Emotional Processing
A Phase 1/2 study testing Simvastatin 20mg in people with Depression and Inflammation, run by University of Oxford at 1 site in United Kingdom.
Trial summary
Work in our group has revealed that short-term (7-day) administration of antidepressants produces positive biases in the processing of emotional information in healthy volunteers. Such effect might be an important neuropsychological mechanism of antidepressant action. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 50 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Depression, Inflammation
- What is being tested?
- Simvastatin 20mg
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 53 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited Kingdom
- Study dates
- 3 Dec 2020to 1 Sep 2021
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 50 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Male or female
- Aged 18-50 years
- Sufficiently fluent English to understand and complete the tasks
- Body Mass Index in the range of 18-30
- Participant is willing and able to give informed consent for participation in the study
- Not currently taking any regular medications (except the contraceptive pill)
Who cannot join
- Currently any regular medications (except the contraceptive pill)
- History or current significant psychiatric illness
- Current alcohol or substance misuse disorder
- History or current significant hepatic disease
- History or current significant neurological condition (e.g. epilepsy)
- History of haemorrhagic stroke or lacunar infarct
Show all 11Show fewer
- Known hyperglycaemia/pre-diabetes
- Known hypersensitivity to the study drug (i.e. simvastatin) or sucrose
- Pregnant, breast feeding, women of child-bearing potential not using appropriate contraceptive measures
- Participation in a study that uses the same or similar computer tasks as those used in the present study
- Participation in a study that involves the use of a medication within the last three months
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United Kingdom1 site
Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford
Oxford, Oxfordshire, OX3 7JX
About this study
Official title: The Effect of Seven-day Simvastatin Administration on Emotional Processing, Reward Processing, and Inflammation in Healthy Volunteers
Work in our group has revealed that short-term (7-day) administration of antidepressants produces positive biases in the processing of emotional information in healthy volunteers. Such effect might be an important neuropsychological mechanism of antidepressant action.
The current study will investigate the effect of seven-day administration of simvastatin 20mg on emotional and reward processing tasks in healthy volunteers. There is evidence that statins may exert antidepressant effects via anti-inflammatory and anti-oxidant pathways, and it is therefore predicted that simvastatin will have positive effects on emotional and reward processing.
Read the detailed description
Depression is common and associated with considerable health disability (Kassebaum-2016). Traditional antidepressants mainly work by modulating monoamine levels in the synaptic cleft (Harmer-2017); however, the evidence that depression is caused by impaired serotonin or noradrenaline activity is weak and inconsistent (Cowen-2015), and indeed current antidepressant strategies remain burdened by partial efficacy, poor side-effects profile, and a slow onset of therapeutic action (Penn-2012). Therefore, there is a pressing need to develop antidepressant medications with novel non-monoaminergic mechanisms of action (Jha-2018) - or, conversely, to identify alternative pathophysiological pathways leading to depression that can be targeted with new drugs. Intriguingly, there is growing evidence that both peripheral and central inflammation play a role in the pathophysiology of depression (Miller-2017).
Patients with depression consistently show negative biases in emotional processing, which are believed to play a key role in the aetiology and maintenance of their clinical symptoms (Roiser-2013). Overall, robust evidence suggests that early changes in emotional processing can serve as valid surrogate markers of antidepressant efficacy (Harmer-2017); for example, seven days' treatment with selective serotonin and noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors (citalopram and reboxetine respectively) compared to placebo decreases the recognition of negative facial expressions and recall of negative versus positive stimuli in healthy volunteers (Harmer-2004). Conversely, another study using the pro-inflammatory cytokine interferon-α showed that inflammatory-mediated depression can be associated with an increased recognition of negative facial expressions (Cooper-2017). Furthermore, depression associated with inflammation is characterised by significant symptoms of anhedonia (Miller-2017), which has been linked to diminished neural responses to reward anticipation (Felger-2017). Such reward-deficit is particularly refractory to conventional serotoninergic and noradrenergic antidepressants (McCabe-201), and even the antidepressant bupropion (a noradrenaline and dopamine reuptake inhibitor), whilst inducing positive changes in emotional processing, appears not to improve reward processing (Walsh-2018). However, the reversal of this deficit in reward processing is still considered as a valuable marker of target engagement for anti-inflammatory drugs in depression, as a more sensitive outcome measure than traditional rating scales designed to capture the global clinical symptomatology (Miller-2017).
The 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA reductase inhibitors or statins are recommended and have been widely used since the '80s for the primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular diseases (NICE 2014). It is now established that these medications have significant anti-inflammatory effects that are independent from their lipid-lowering properties (Jain-2005), as well as appearing early in treatment only after seven day of administration (Macin-2011). Statins are considered extremely safe drugs: their more common side-effect are muscle pain or weakness (usually mild and quickly responding to stopping or switching medication) and elevation of liver transaminases (significant only in case of pre-existing hepatic disease), whereas more serious adverse events include rhabdomyolysis (very rare but severe myopathy associated with elevated creatine kinase and myoglobinuria), new-onset diabetes mellitus (in predisposed individual with pre-existing hyperglycaemia), and haemorrhagic stroke (in patients with prior haemorrhagic stroke or lacunar infarct); however, clinical trials have ultimately concluded that such adverse events attributed to statin therapy in routine practice are not actually caused by it (Collins-2016). Other common (≥ 1/100, < 1/10) but usually mild side-effects include: nasopharyngitis, pharyngo-laryngeal pain, epistaxis, headache, and gastrointestinal disturbances (constipation, diarrhoea, flatulence, dyspepsia, nausea). Importantly, a potential antidepressant effect for statins has been confirmed in animals (Kilic-2012), as well as clinically in observational (Parsaik-2014) and interventional studies (Salagre-2016). Although their anti-inflammatory and anti-oxidant properties have been proposed, the precise mechanisms underlying the antidepressant effects of statins remain unclear, therefore further translational studies have been advocated in order to elucidate this aspect (Köhler-Forsberg-2017).
In this exploratory study, we will investigate the effect of seven-day administration of simvastatin 20mg once daily compared to placebo on emotional and reward processing tasks in 50 healthy volunteers. In view of the previous evidence that statins may exert antidepressant effects via anti-inflammatory and anti-oxidant pathways, we predict that simvastatin will have positive effect on emotional and reward processing.
- Conditions
- Depression, Inflammation
- Being tested
- Simvastatin 20mg, Placebo
- Keywords
- Depression, Inflammation
- Medical subject headings
- Depression, Inflammation
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Simvastatin 20mgDrug
Simvastatin 20mg once a day for 7 days
PlaceboDrug
Placebo once a day for 7 days
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Experimental arm: Simvastatin | Experimental | Simvastatin 20mg capsule once a day for 7 days Receives: Drug: Simvastatin 20mg |
| Control arm: Placebo | Placebo comparator | Placebo capsule once a day for 7 days Receives: Drug: Placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
FERT
The effects of simvastatin on emotional processing using the Facial Expression Recognition Task (FERT).
FERT is a computer-based tasks of emotional processing using facial expressions of basic emotions (happiness, fear, anger, disgust, sadness, surprise) displayed on the screen and participants are asked to correctly classify them. Each emotion is presented at different intensity levels. Responses are made via a button-press. Accuracy and reaction times are measured.
Measured: Day 7 of drug/placebo administration
Secondary outcomes (7)
EMEM
The effects of simvastatin on Emotional Memory Task (EMEM) scores. Recall and recognition of affective words displayed earlier in the testing session are tested. Responses are made via a button-press. Accuracy and reaction times are measured.
Measured: Day 7 of drug/placebo administration
ECAT
The effects of simvastatin on Emotional Categorisation Task (ECAT) scores. Disagreeable or agreeable personality descriptions are presented and participants are asked to indicate whether they would like or dislike to be described as each of these characteristics. Responses are made via a button-press. Accuracy and reaction times are measured.
Measured: Day 7 of drug/placebo administration
EREC
The effects of simvastatin on Emotional Recall Task (EREC) scores. Participants are asked to write down as many of the words as they can remember from the previous task. Responses are made via pencil and paper. Accuracy is measured.
Measured: Day 7 of drug/placebo administration
FDOT
The effects of simvastatin on Faces Dot-probe Task (FDOT) scores. Participants carry out a computer-based task of attentional vigilance to happy or fearful faces, recorded from participants' response latency to indicate the alignment of a dot-probe appearing in the place of one of the faces. Responses are made via button-press. Accuracy and reaction times are measured.
Measured: Day 7 of drug/placebo administration
PILT
The effects of simvastatin on Probabilistic Instrumental Learning Task (PILT) scores.
Participants have to learn which shapes are associated with wins and losses. Responses are made via button-press. Sensitivity to reward is measured.
Measured: Day 7 of drug/placebo administration
AVLT
The effects of simvastatin on Auditory Verbal Learning Task (AVLT) scores. Accuracy of recall on the auditory verbal learning task.
Measured: Day 7 of drug/placebo administration
CRP
The effects of simvastatin on C-reactive Protein (CRP) levels. Phlebotomy is performed to obtain a sample of CRP at baseline and at day 7 of drug/placebo administration. Changes in CRP levels are measured.
Measured: Day 7 of drug/placebo administration
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted3 Dec 2020
- Study start3 Dec 2020
- Primary completion1 Sep 2021
- Study completion1 Sep 2021
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for DepressionStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of OxfordThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Primary purpose
- Basic science
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Parallel Assignment Participants will be randomly allocated to one of two groups (simvastatin or placebo) and take the assigned medication for 7 days
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 53 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Oxford
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04652089
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- R69606/RE001
- Acronym
- SSTEP-HV
- Status last verified
- Dec 2020
- First submitted
- 26 Nov 2020
- Last updated
- 3 Nov 2022
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
De Giorgi R, Quinton AMG, Waters S, Cowen PJ, Harmer CJ. An experimental medicine study of the effects of simvastatin on emotional processing, reward learning, verbal memory, and inflammation in healthy volunteers. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2022 Aug;239(8):2635-2645. doi: 10.1007/s00213-022-06156-y. Epub 2022 May 5.
PubMed 35511258
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 3 Nov 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Effect of Seven-day Simvastatin Administration on Emotional Processing, Reward Processing, and Inflammation in Healthy Volunteers
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04652089
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- SSTEP-HV / R69606/RE001
- Conditions
- Depression, Inflammation
- Keywords
- Depression, Inflammation
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 53 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of OxfordUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 3 Dec 2020 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Sep 2021 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 Sep 2021 (actual)
- First posted
- 3 Dec 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Work in our group has revealed that short-term (7-day) administration of antidepressants produces positive biases in the processing of emotional information in healthy volunteers. Such effect might be an important neuropsychological mechanism of antidepressant action.
The current study will investigate the effect of seven-day administration of simvastatin 20mg on emotional and reward processing tasks in healthy volunteers. There is evidence that statins may exert antidepressant effects via anti-inflammatory and anti-oxidant pathways, and it is therefore predicted that simvastatin will have positive effects on emotional and reward processing.
Detailed description
Depression is common and associated with considerable health disability (Kassebaum-2016). Traditional antidepressants mainly work by modulating monoamine levels in the synaptic cleft (Harmer-2017); however, the evidence that depression is caused by impaired serotonin or noradrenaline activity is weak and inconsistent (Cowen-2015), and indeed current antidepressant strategies remain burdened by partial efficacy, poor side-effects profile, and a slow onset of therapeutic action (Penn-2012). Therefore, there is a pressing need to develop antidepressant medications with novel non-monoaminergic mechanisms of action (Jha-2018) - or, conversely, to identify alternative pathophysiological pathways leading to depression that can be targeted with new drugs. Intriguingly, there is growing evidence that both peripheral and central inflammation play a role in the pathophysiology of depression (Miller-2017).
Patients with depression consistently show negative biases in emotional processing, which are believed to play a key role in the aetiology and maintenance of their clinical symptoms (Roiser-2013). Overall, robust evidence suggests that early changes in emotional processing can serve as valid surrogate markers of antidepressant efficacy (Harmer-2017); for example, seven days' treatment with selective serotonin and noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors (citalopram and reboxetine respectively) compared to placebo decreases the recognition of negative facial expressions and recall of negative versus positive stimuli in healthy volunteers (Harmer-2004). Conversely, another study using the pro-inflammatory cytokine interferon-α showed that inflammatory-mediated depression can be associated with an increased recognition of negative facial expressions (Cooper-2017). Furthermore, depression associated with inflammation is characterised by significant symptoms of anhedonia (Miller-2017), which has been linked to diminished neural responses to reward anticipation (Felger-2017). Such reward-deficit is particularly refractory to conventional serotoninergic and noradrenergic antidepressants (McCabe-201), and even the antidepressant bupropion (a noradrenaline and dopamine reuptake inhibitor), whilst inducing positive changes in emotional processing, appears not to improve reward processing (Walsh-2018). However, the reversal of this deficit in reward processing is still considered as a valuable marker of target engagement for anti-inflammatory drugs in depression, as a more sensitive outcome measure than traditional rating scales designed to capture the global clinical symptomatology (Miller-2017).
The 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA reductase inhibitors or statins are recommended and have been widely used since the '80s for the primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular diseases (NICE 2014). It is now established that these medications have significant anti-inflammatory effects that are independent from their lipid-lowering properties (Jain-2005), as well as appearing early in treatment only after seven day of administration (Macin-2011). Statins are considered extremely safe drugs: their more common side-effect are muscle pain or weakness (usually mild and quickly responding to stopping or switching medication) and elevation of liver transaminases (significant only in case of pre-existing hepatic disease), whereas more serious adverse events include rhabdomyolysis (very rare but severe myopathy associated with elevated creatine kinase and myoglobinuria), new-onset diabetes mellitus (in predisposed individual with pre-existing hyperglycaemia), and haemorrhagic stroke (in patients with prior haemorrhagic stroke or lacunar infarct); however, clinical trials have ultimately concluded that such adverse events attributed to statin therapy in routine practice are not actually caused by it (Collins-2016). Other common (≥ 1/100, < 1/10) but usually mild side-effects include: nasopharyngitis, pharyngo-laryngeal pain, epistaxis, headache, and gastrointestinal disturbances (constipation, diarrhoea, flatulence, dyspepsia, nausea). Importantly, a potential antidepressant effect for statins has been confirmed in animals (Kilic-2012), as well as clinically in observational (Parsaik-2014) and interventional studies (Salagre-2016). Although their anti-inflammatory and anti-oxidant properties have been proposed, the precise mechanisms underlying the antidepressant effects of statins remain unclear, therefore further translational studies have been advocated in order to elucidate this aspect (Köhler-Forsberg-2017).
In this exploratory study, we will investigate the effect of seven-day administration of simvastatin 20mg once daily compared to placebo on emotional and reward processing tasks in 50 healthy volunteers. In view of the previous evidence that statins may exert antidepressant effects via anti-inflammatory and anti-oxidant pathways, we predict that simvastatin will have positive effect on emotional and reward processing.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Basic science
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Parallel Assignment Participants will be randomly allocated to one of two groups (simvastatin or placebo) and take the assigned medication for 7 days
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Experimental arm: Simvastatin | Experimental | Drug: Simvastatin 20mgSimvastatin 20mg capsule once a day for 7 days |
| Control arm: Placebo | Placebo comparator | Drug: PlaceboPlacebo capsule once a day for 7 days |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 50 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Male or female
- Aged 18-50 years
- Sufficiently fluent English to understand and complete the tasks
- Body Mass Index in the range of 18-30
- Participant is willing and able to give informed consent for participation in the study
Key exclusion criteria (11 listed)
- Currently any regular medications (except the contraceptive pill)
- History or current significant psychiatric illness
- Current alcohol or substance misuse disorder
- History or current significant hepatic disease
- History or current significant neurological condition (e.g. epilepsy)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Simvastatin 20mgSimvastatin 20mg once a day for 7 days | Drug | Experimental arm: Simvastatin |
| PlaceboPlacebo once a day for 7 days | Drug | Control arm: Placebo |
Primary outcome
FERT
Time frame: Day 7 of drug/placebo administration
The effects of simvastatin on emotional processing using the Facial Expression Recognition Task (FERT). FERT is a computer-based tasks of emotional processing using facial expressions of basic emotions (happiness, fear, anger, disgust, sadness, surprise) displayed on the screen and participants are asked to correctly classify them. Each emotion is presented at different intensity levels. Responses are made via a button-press. Accuracy and reaction times are measured.
7 secondary outcomes
EMEM
Time frame: Day 7 of drug/placebo administration
ECAT
Time frame: Day 7 of drug/placebo administration
EREC
Time frame: Day 7 of drug/placebo administration
FDOT
Time frame: Day 7 of drug/placebo administration
PILT
Time frame: Day 7 of drug/placebo administration
AVLT
Time frame: Day 7 of drug/placebo administration
CRP
Time frame: Day 7 of drug/placebo administration
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 3 Nov 2022.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 35511258De Giorgi R, Quinton AMG, Waters S, Cowen PJ, Harmer CJ. An experimental medicine study of the effects of simvastatin on emotional processing, reward learning, verbal memory, and inflammation in healthy volunteers. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2022 Aug;239(8):2635-2645. doi: 10.1007/s00213-022-06156-y. Epub 2022 May 5.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Depression
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Validation of Wearable Core Body Temperature-Based Circadian Rhythm Digital Biomarkers
Mood Disorders, Major Depressive Diorder
RecruitingObservational study
A Prospective Study of Anxiety, Depression, and Bipolar Disorder in People
Anxiety Disorders, Depressive Disorder
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study of Vortioxetine in Japanese Pediatric Patients With Major Depressive Disorder
Major Depressive Disorder
Recruiting
Anticipated Patient and Caregiver Burden
Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis
Recruiting
A Study of Brief Behavioral Activation for the Treatment of Depression in Older Adult Cancer Survivors
Survivorship
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 1/2 study testing Simvastatin 20mg in people with Depression and Inflammation, run by University of Oxford at 1 site in United Kingdom.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Nov 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this combined phase mean?
Phase 1 studies test a treatment in a small group of people for the first time or in a new way, mainly to check safety and find the right dose.
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
FERT (time frame: Day 7 of drug/placebo administration). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04652089, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Nov 2022.