AzTrials
AzTrials

Pneumonia, BacterialNCT04652167

Diagnostic Accuracy of Infection Biomarkers in the Initial Investigation of Patients With Suspected Pneumonia

An observational study of Pneumonia, Bacterial, run by University of Southern Denmark at 1 site in Denmark.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The aim of this study is to investigate the diagnostic and prognostic value of C-reactive protein (CRP), serum procalcitonin (PCT) and soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR) in the initial investigation of patients acute hospitalized with suspected community-acquired-pneumonia (CAP) Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Pneumonia, Bacterial
What is being tested?
PCT and suPAR
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
How many people
411 participants
Where
1 siteDenmark
Study dates
1 Mar 2021to 1 Jun 2022
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Patients admitted at the emergency department with suspected pneumonia by the attending physician.

Who may be able to join

  • Adult patients ≥ 18 years old
  • Patients suspected with pneumonia by the attending physician. The physician will base his/her suspicion on e.g. clinical symptoms such as cough, increased sputum production, chest tightness, dyspnea and fever > 38⁰C, and indication for chest x-ray

Who cannot join

  • If the attending physician considers that participation will delay a life-saving treatment or patient needs direct transfer to the intensive care unit.
  • Admission within the last 14 days
  • Verified COVID-19 disease within 14 days before admission
  • Pregnant women
  • Severe immunodeficiencies: Primary immunodeficiencies and secondary immunodeficiencies (HIV positive CD4 <200, Patients receiving immunosuppressive treatment (ATC L04A), Corticosteroid treatment (>20 mg/day prednisone or equivalent for >14 days within the last 30 days), Chemotherapy within 30 days)

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Denmark1 site
  • Hospital of Southern Jutland

    Aabenraa

Other trials in Denmark

About this study

Official title: What is the Diagnostic and Prognostic Accuracy of C-reactive Protein, Serum Procalcitonin and Soluble Urokinase Plasminogen Activator Receptor in the Initial Investigation of Patients With Suspected Community-acquired Pneumonia

The aim of this study is to investigate the diagnostic and prognostic value of C-reactive protein (CRP), serum procalcitonin (PCT) and soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR) in the initial investigation of patients acute hospitalized with suspected community-acquired-pneumonia (CAP)

Read the detailed description

Target pneumonia treatment should be initiated within a few hours, which is why early and accurate diagnosis is extremely important. Uncertain or delayed diagnosis will often lead to an overconsumption of broad-spectrum antibiotics, which contributes to increased development of resistant bacteria and thus threaten the treatment options of the future. Pneumonia diagnosis is primarily made today on the basis of clinical symptoms and findings in the form of cough, vomiting, chest pain, fever, shortness of breath, supplemented with X-ray of the lungs, relevant blood tests and analysis of expectoration. However, X-ray is an imprecise diagnostic tool. The diagnosis of CAP is challenged by nonspecific symptoms, uncertain diagnostic methods and waiting time for test results up to several days.

Therefore, numerous studies have investigated biomarkers that can possibly support the diagnosis of CAP. C-reactive protein (CRP) and serum procalcitonin (PCT) are biomarkers that may distinguish CAP from other causes of acute respiratory infections. The CRP biomarker has been endorsed as a guide for antibiotic treatment by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) and PCT was suggested by the American Infectious Diseases Society of America. Soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR) has emerged as a potentially novel biomarker for inflammatory diseases including pneumonia. Several studies have highlighted suPAR as a significant prognostic mortality marker and strongly related to disease severity and worse outcome in a variety of conditions. It is also a promising biological marker in the diagnosis of CAP.

The diagnostic value of the optimal biomarkers for the diagnosis of CAP remains controversial. The investigators hypothesize that serum CRP, PTC and suPAR have an impact on diagnosing, prognosis, and treatment of patients with a verified community-acquired-pneumonia. The objectives of the study are:

  • To identify the diagnostic accuracy of CRP, PCT and suPAR in community-acquired pneumonia
  • To identify the prognostic value of CRP, PCT and suPAR in relation to adverse events
Being tested
PCT, suPAR, Standard care
Keywords
C-reactive protein,, serum procalcitonin,, soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor
Medical subject headings
Pneumonia, Bacterial

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • PCTDiagnostic test

    Serum PCT concentration is quantified with an automated sandwich immunoassay "ECLIA" (Elecsys®, BRAHMS PCT-analyses) on Cobas e801. Calibration (BRAHMS PCT LIA assay) is performed once per reagent lot and no later than 24 h after Cobas e pack has been registered in the instrument. Quality control is performed after each calibration.

  • suPARDiagnostic test

    Serum suPAR was measured using suPARnostic© Turbilatex assay reagents (validated on Cobas© c111) protocol for Cobas© c702 and c502 applying the Multi-Pack cassettes (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany). Calibration is performed at least once a month or in connection to a new batch of TurbiLatex reagents, after calibration a quality control is performed.

  • Standard careDiagnostic test

    Standard care is the measurement of CRP (C-reactive protein) will be measured with C - reactive protein (CRP4) immunoturbidimetric assay (Tina-quant®, Roche) on Roche/Hitachi cobas© systems c701/702. Calibration is performed (Tina-quant® C - reactive protein IV) once per reagent lot and after 6 months using the same reagent lot. Quality control is required after calibration and according manufacturing instructions.

Study groups in NCT04652167
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Patients suspected of community-acquired pneumoniaAll patients admitted to the emergency department with suspected community- acquired pneumonia by the attending physician
Receives: Diagnostic Test: PCT; Diagnostic Test: suPAR; Diagnostic Test: Standard care

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Diagnostic of community acquired pneumonia

    The percentage of patients diagnosed with community-acquired pneumonia determined by an expert panel. This outcome measure is a binary variable - verified pneumonia or no pneumonia.

    The expert panel consists of two independent consultants from the emergency department with experience in infection and emergency medicine, who individually will determine whether the patient admitted with suspected community-acquired pneumonia, had the diagnosis. The diagnosis will be based on all available relevant information from the patient medical record within 48 hours from admission including computed tomography. A standardized template will be used. Disagreement will be discussed until a consensus is reached.

    .

    Measured: expert assessment within 3 months after patient discharge from the hospital

Secondary outcomes (6)
  1. Intensive care unit (ICU) treatment

    Transfer to the intensive care unit will be recorded during the current hospitalization as a binary variable (transferred/not-transferred)

    Measured: within 60 days from admission to the emergency department

  2. Length of hospital stay (LOS

    Defined as the time (in days) spent in hospital during the current admission. Measured in days from admission to hospital discharge. Discharge date minus admission date.

    Measured: within 60 days from current admission to the emergency department

  3. 30-days mortality

    Mortality within 30 days from admission to the Emergency Department

    Measured: 30 days from the admission to the emergency department

  4. 90-days mortality

    Mortality within 90 days from admission to the Emergency Department

    Measured: 90 days from the admission to the emergency department

  5. Readmission

    If a subject is admitted over a 30 day period after the current hospitalization discharge measured as a binary outcome Re-admissions/not re-admissions

    Measured: within 30 days from the discharge to the hospital

  6. In-hospital mortality

    Patient mortality during the current hospitalization. Binary outcome - Died/ Not died

    Measured: within 60 days from admission to the emergency department

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted3 Dec 2020
  2. Study start1 Mar 2021
  3. Primary completion28 Feb 2022
  4. Study completion1 Jun 2022

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
411 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04652167
Sponsor's protocol ID
SHS-ED-11d-2020
Status last verified
Sep 2022
First submitted
26 Nov 2020
Last updated
14 Sep 2022
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Johnstone J, Mandell L. Guidelines and quality measures: do they improve outcomes of patients with community-acquired pneumonia? Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2013 Mar;27(1):71-86. doi: 10.1016/j.idc.2012.11.001.

    PubMed 23398866
  • Musher DM, Thorner AR. Community-acquired pneumonia. N Engl J Med. 2014 Oct 23;371(17):1619-28. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1312885. No abstract available.

    PubMed 25337751
  • Hey J, Thompson-Leduc P, Kirson NY, Zimmer L, Wilkins D, Rice B, Iankova I, Krause A, Schonfeld SA, DeBrase CR, Bozzette S, Schuetz P. Procalcitonin guidance in patients with lower respiratory tract infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2018 Jul 26;56(8):1200-1209. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2018-0126.

    PubMed 29715176
  • Wussler D, Kozhuharov N, Tavares Oliveira M, Bossa A, Sabti Z, Nowak A, Murray K, du Fay de Lavallaz J, Badertscher P, Twerenbold R, Shrestha S, Flores D, Nestelberger T, Walter J, Boeddinghaus J, Zimmermann T, Koechlin L, von Eckardstein A, Breidthardt T, Mueller C. Clinical Utility of Procalcitonin in the Diagnosis of Pneumonia. Clin Chem. 2019 Dec;65(12):1532-1542. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2019.306787. Epub 2019 Oct 15.

    PubMed 31615771
  • Loonen AJM, Kesarsing C, Kusters R, Hilbink M, Wever PC, van den Brule AJC. High pneumococcal DNA load, procalcitonin and suPAR levels correlate to severe disease development in patients with pneumococcal pneumonia. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2017 Sep;36(9):1541-1547. doi: 10.1007/s10096-017-2963-2. Epub 2017 Mar 29.

    PubMed 28353184
  • Ni W, Han Y, Zhao J, Cui J, Wang K, Wang R, Liu Y. Serum soluble urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor as a biological marker of bacterial infection in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Rep. 2016 Dec 19;6:39481. doi: 10.1038/srep39481.

    PubMed 27991579
  • Song S, Jia Q, Chen X, Lei Z, He X, Leng Z, Chen S. Serum suPAR associated with disease severity and mortality in elderly patients with community-acquired pneumonia. Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 2020 Oct;80(6):515-522. doi: 10.1080/00365513.2020.1795920. Epub 2020 Jul 27.

    PubMed 32716662
  • Skjot-Arkil H, Heltborg A, Lorentzen MH, Cartuliares MB, Hertz MA, Graumann O, Rosenvinge FS, Petersen ERB, Ostergaard C, Laursen CB, Skovsted TA, Posth S, Chen M, Mogensen CB. Improved diagnostics of infectious diseases in emergency departments: a protocol of a multifaceted multicentre diagnostic study. BMJ Open. 2021 Sep 30;11(9):e049606. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049606.

    PubMed 34593497

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Pneumonia, Bacterial, run by University of Southern Denmark at 1 site in Denmark.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 Sep 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Denmark. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Diagnostic of community acquired pneumonia (time frame: expert assessment within 3 months after patient discharge from the hospital). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04652167, which also lists 8 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 Sep 2022.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in