AzTrials
AzTrials

Nerve InjuryNCT04653129

Autologous Fat in Peripheral Nerve Injury

A study testing Autologous Fat Grafting and Primary Nerve Repair in people with Nerve Injury, run by Assiut University.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The aim of this study is to assess the efficacy of autologous fat graft in enhancing peripheral nerve regeneration. The investigators hypothesize that fat grafting will allow for faster and greater recovery of motor and sensory function following surgical repair of injured peripheral nerves. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 16 to 65 years
Conditions the study is for
Nerve Injury
What is being tested?
Autologous Fat Grafting and Primary Nerve Repair
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
44 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
Jan 2021to Jan 2023
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 16 to 65 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Acute median or ulnar nerve lacerations below elbow

Who cannot join

  • Old Nerve lacerations > 48 hours
  • Nerve gap which requires nerve grafting
  • Psychosocial issues that would limit participation and compliance

Trial locations and contacts

No sites are listed yet.

About this study

Official title: Use of Autologous Fat to Improve Functional Outcomes After Upper Limb Nerve Injuries

The aim of this study is to assess the efficacy of autologous fat graft in enhancing peripheral nerve regeneration. The investigators hypothesize that fat grafting will allow for faster and greater recovery of motor and sensory function following surgical repair of injured peripheral nerves.

Read the detailed description

Traumatic injuries to peripheral nerves are a frequent finding after hand trauma. High morbidity after nerve injuries mainly affects the younger and working population, with consequent decrease in life quality and productivity .

Even in direct nerve repair and microsurgical nerve coaptation, regeneration is often suboptimal with incomplete target reinnervation. Suboptimal outcome is attributed to axonal degeneration, fibrotic scar formation, and neuromas at the site of injury.

The use of adipose tissue has become very popular in tissue engineering and reconstructive surgery in recent years. It is proposed as a "regenerative tool" for various tissues, including peripheral nerves, because it offers an effective and minimally invasive procedure for obtaining stem cells.

Unprocessed fat grafting can provide a simple approach to improve peripheral nerve regeneration by means of neoangiogenesis \& inflammatory response modulation. Furthermore, it serves as a good protective barrier in peripheral nerve surgery, reducing fibrosis and adhesions.

A recent study advocated by Tuncel et al, concluded that combined use of autologous fat graft with surgical repair methods induced significantly better regeneration in rats [3]. In another study by Kilic et al, using adipose tissue flap in a crush injury model in rats was found to be superior to other groups in myelin thickness, nerve fiber density, axon count, and functional recovery at 4 weeks. They concluded that fat tissue seems to promote nerve regeneration because of its stem cell content.

To our knowledge, no prior studies have examined the use of fat graft in peripheral nerve repair in humans. So, the investigators proposed this clinical study to evaluate the outcomes of primary nerve repair combined with autologous fat graft in peripheral nerve injuries.

Conditions
Nerve Injury
Being tested
Autologous Fat Grafting, Primary Nerve Repair
Keywords
fat graft, autologous fat, peripheral nerve injury
Medical subject headings
Peripheral Nerve Injuries

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Autologous Fat GraftingProcedure or surgery

    • The fat grafts will be harvested from the abdomen or lateral thighs in a closed sterile system, then prepared according to Coleman guidelines. The blood and oil layers are then separated from the adipose tissue.
    • The lipoaspirate will be injected based on a technique described by Vaienti et al, by 17-gaug cannula which will be inserted through the skin around the main incision at the nerve repair site, and the fat graft will be injected after closure of the skin.
  • Primary Nerve RepairProcedure or surgery

    Standard Epineural nerve repairs will be performed with 9/0 nylon sutures, under magnification by an operating microscope.

Study groups in NCT04653129
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Group (A): Primary nerve repair with autologous fat graftExperimentalStandard nerve repair will be performed with 9/0 nylon sutures, under magnification by an operating microscope with autologous fat grafting around site of repair
Receives: Procedure: Autologous Fat Grafting; Procedure: Primary Nerve Repair
Group (B): Standard primary nerve repairActive comparatorStandard nerve repair will be performed with 9/0 nylon sutures, under magnification by an operating microscope without fat grafting.
Receives: Procedure: Primary Nerve Repair

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Modified British Medical Research Council, sensory grading

    standardized clinical assessment of sensory function using two-point discrimination and monofilament testing by a score from S0 to S4; the higher score indicates better sensation

    Measured: 6-12 months

  2. Modified British Medical Research Council, motor grading

    standardized clinical assessment of motor function on a scale from M0 to M5; the higher score indicates better strength.

    Measured: 6-12 months

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Nerve conduction study

    measure for amplitude of response, latency of response and velocity of response measurements.

    Measured: 6-12 months

  2. Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score

    self-administered region-specific outcome instrument developed as a measure of self-rated upper-extremity disability and symptoms. The DASH consists mainly of a 30-item disability/symptom scale, scored 0 (no disability) to 100 (most severe disability)

    Measured: 6-12 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted4 Dec 2020
  2. Study startJan 2021 (estimated)
  3. Primary completionJan 2022 (estimated)
  4. Study completionJan 2023 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
44 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04653129
Sponsor's protocol ID
Fat for Nerve Injury
Status last verified
Dec 2020
First submitted
27 Nov 2020
Last updated
7 Dec 2020
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Di Summa PG, Schiraldi L, Cherubino M, Oranges CM, Kalbermatten DF, Raffoul W, Madduri S. Adipose Derived Stem Cells Reduce Fibrosis and Promote Nerve Regeneration in Rats. Anat Rec (Hoboken). 2018 Oct;301(10):1714-1721. doi: 10.1002/ar.23841. Epub 2018 Jul 10.

    PubMed 29710394
  • Ngeow WC. Scar less: a review of methods of scar reduction at sites of peripheral nerve repair. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2010 Mar;109(3):357-66. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2009.06.030.

    PubMed 20219599
  • Tuncel U, Kostakoglu N, Turan A, Cevik B, Cayli S, Demir O, Elmas C. The Effect of Autologous Fat Graft with Different Surgical Repair Methods on Nerve Regeneration in a Rat Sciatic Nerve Defect Model. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015 Dec;136(6):1181-1191. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000001822.

    PubMed 26273733
  • Walocko FM, Khouri RK Jr, Urbanchek MG, Levi B, Cederna PS. The potential roles for adipose tissue in peripheral nerve regeneration. Microsurgery. 2016 Jan;36(1):81-8. doi: 10.1002/micr.22480. Epub 2015 Sep 7.

    PubMed 26773850
  • Kilic A, Ojo B, Rajfer RA, Konopka G, Hagg D, Jang E, Akelina Y, Mao JJ, Rosenwasser MP, Tang P. Effect of white adipose tissue flap and insulin-like growth factor-1 on nerve regeneration in rats. Microsurgery. 2013 Jul;33(5):367-75. doi: 10.1002/micr.22101. Epub 2013 May 7.

    PubMed 23653396
  • Iannace C, Di Libero L, Manetta F, Sciascia V, Pizza A, Napolitano S, Ferraro A, Scetta G, Esposito D, Varriale S, Candela G, Caracciolo F. [Coleman lipofilling: experience of an Italian group and review of the literature]. Chir Ital. 2009 Jan-Feb;61(1):67-75. Italian.

    PubMed 19391342
  • Vaienti L, Gazzola R, Villani F, Parodi PC. Perineural fat grafting in the treatment of painful neuromas. Tech Hand Up Extrem Surg. 2012 Mar;16(1):52-5. doi: 10.1097/BTH.0b013e31823cd218.

    PubMed 22411121

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Autologous Fat Grafting and Primary Nerve Repair in people with Nerve Injury, run by Assiut University.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 Dec 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Ahmed S Sharaf, MsC (01090619155 ext. +2, ahmed.sharaf90@aun.edu.eg), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Modified British Medical Research Council, sensory grading (time frame: 6-12 months). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04653129, which also lists 7 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 Dec 2020.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in