AzTrials
AzTrials

Covid19AtemNHKNCT04653727

Effects of Integrative Medicine on Infectious Respiratory Diseases Including COVID-19

An observational study of Covid19 and Influenza A, run by Charite University, Berlin, Germany at 1 site in Germany.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The outbreak of the novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 caused a health emergency of international proportions when it was declared by the World Health Organization (WHO) in January 2020. Since then, the virus has spread internationally and the WHO has classified the outbreak as a pandemic. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 99 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Covid19, Influenza A, Respiratory Disease
What is being tested?
Cross-sectional survey
How many people
1,287 participants
Where
1 siteGermany
Study dates
6 Jan 2021to 5 Mar 2021
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 99 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: The study is advertised via a website, thus all interested people can participate in this survey.

Who may be able to join

  • Present declaration of consent

Who cannot join

  • Lack of consent to participate in the study

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Germany1 site
  • Charite University

    Berlin, 14169

Other trials in Germany

About this study

Official title: Effects of Interventions and Lifestyle Modifications in Integrative Medicine and the Course of Infectious Respiratory Diseases Including COVID-19

The outbreak of the novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 caused a health emergency of international proportions when it was declared by the World Health Organization (WHO) in January 2020. Since then, the virus has spread internationally and the WHO has classified the outbreak as a pandemic. In the context of the increasing reporting of this pandemic and the increasing governmental measures to limit or slow down the spread of SARS-CoV-2 by all means, there is so far little scientific evidence for the effects of a healthy lifestyle on the disease. The aim of this study is to compare the potential of different, possibly protective lifestyles using the example of the COVID-19 pandemic. We will conduct an online survey with 3.000 participants using mobile website technology.

Being tested
Cross-sectional survey
Medical subject headings
COVID-19, Respiration Disorders

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Cross-sectional surveyOther

    No intervention.

Study groups in NCT04653727
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Online survey with 3.000 participants using mobile website technologyNot described
Receives: Other: Cross-sectional survey

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. SARS-CoV-2 infection

    Measured: Assessed retrospectively (last 6 months) with self-designed question

Secondary outcomes (19)
  1. Influenza virus infection

    Measured: Assessed retrospectively (last 6 months) with self-designed question

  2. Other respiratory infections

    Measured: Assessed retrospectively (last 6 months) with self-designed question

  3. Dietary habits

    Measured: Assessed retrospectively (last 6 months) with self-designed question

  4. Sports activity

    Measured: Assessed retrospectively (last 6 months) with self-designed question

  5. Time spent in nature

    Measured: Assessed retrospectively (last 6 months) with self-designed question

  6. Use of hydrotherapy/Kneipp applications

    Measured: Assessed retrospectively (last 6 months) with self-designed question

  7. Use of anthroposophic medicine

    Measured: Assessed retrospectively (last 6 months) with self-designed question

  8. Use of digital health services

    Measured: Assessed retrospectively (last 6 months) with self-designed question

  9. Use of phytotherapy

    Measured: Assessed retrospectively (last 6 months) with self-designed question

  10. Use of dietary supplements

    Measured: Assessed retrospectively (last 6 months) with self-designed question

  11. WHO-5 Well-Being Index

    The scale ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 is the lowest level of well-being / lowest quality of life and 100 is the highest level of well-being / highest quality of life.

    Measured: Assessed when filling out the questionnaire (Baseline)

  12. Numeric analog scale (NAS) stress

    The NAS ranges from 0 to 10, where 0 is the lowest level of stress and 10 is the highest level of stress.

    Measured: Assessed retrospectively (last 6 months) with self-designed question

  13. Numeric analog scale (NAS) anxiety

    The NAS ranges from 0 to 10, where 0 is the lowest level of anxiety and 10 is the highest level of anxiety.

    Measured: Assessed retrospectively (last 6 months) with self-designed question

  14. Numeric analog scale (NAS) depression

    The NAS ranges from 0 to 10, where 0 is the lowest level of anxiety and 10 is the highest level of anxiety.

    Measured: Assessed retrospectively (last 6 months) with self-designed question

  15. Use of relaxation / mind body approaches

    Measured: Assessed retrospectively (last 6 months) with self-designed question

  16. Alcohol consumption

    Measured: Assessed retrospectively (last 6 months) with self-designed question

  17. Cigarette consumption

    Measured: Assessed retrospectively (last 6 months) with self-designed question

  18. Self-efficacy

    The scale ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 is the lowest level of self-efficacy and 100 is the highest level of self-efficacy.

    Measured: Assessed when filling out the questionnaire (Baseline)

  19. Sick leave

    Measured: Assessed retrospectively (last 6 months) with self-designed question

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted4 Dec 2020
  2. Study start6 Jan 2021
  3. Primary completion5 Mar 2021
  4. Study completion5 Mar 2021

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Other
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrolment
1,287 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04653727
Sponsor's protocol ID
AtemNHK
Acronym
AtemNHK
Status last verified
Sep 2022
First submitted
23 Nov 2020
Last updated
29 Sep 2022
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Jeitler M, Erehman A, Koppold DA, Ortiz M, Jerzynski L, Stockigt B, Rotter G, Blakeslee S, Brinkhaus B, Michalsen A, Seifert G, Cramer H, Kandil FI, Kessler CS. Self-care and lifestyle interventions of complementary and integrative medicine during the COVID-19 pandemic-A cross-sectional study. Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 Jan 9;9:1033181. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.1033181. eCollection 2022.

    PubMed 36698795

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Covid19 and Influenza A, run by Charite University, Berlin, Germany at 1 site in Germany.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Sep 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Germany. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

SARS-CoV-2 infection (time frame: Assessed retrospectively (last 6 months) with self-designed question). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04653727, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Sep 2022.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in