AzTrials
AzTrials

Adenoma ColonNCT04654247

Endoscopic Quality Improvement System Study

A study testing Quality audit and feedback in people with Adenoma Colon and Gastric Precancerous Condition, run by Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University at 1 site in China.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

We intend to develop intelligent quality control and management software based on the work of digestive endoscopic artificial intelligence in the Department of Gastroenterology, Wuhan University Renmin Hospital, to accurately and comprehensively assess the quality of gastrointestinal endoscopy and to provide a… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Adenoma Colon, Gastric Precancerous Condition
What is being tested?
Quality audit and feedback
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
17 participants
Where
1 siteChina
Study dates
20 Apr 2019to 25 Nov 2019
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Endoscopist:
  • Endoscopist with more than one year experience in gastrointestinal mirror operation;
  • Willing to further improve endoscopic quality through Endo.Adm feedback;
  • Ability to read, understand and sign informed consent; The investigator believes that the subject understands the flow of the clinical study and is willing and able to complete all research procedures and follow-up visits in conjunction with the research process.

Who cannot join

  • Endoscopist:
  • Have participated in other clinical trials;
  • Frequently attending in academic conference which is difficult to ensure the number of endoscopic operations;
  • Endoscopist who were either not present for both parts (phase1 and phase2) of the study.
  • Patients:
  • Colonoscopy:
Show all 13Show fewer
  • Polyposis syndromes
  • Lumen obstruction
  • History of colorectal surgery
  • History of colorectal surgery
  • Gastroscopy:
  • Obstruction
  • History of gastric surgery

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

China1 site
  • Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University

    Wuhan, Hubei, 430000

Other trials in China

About this study

Official title: A Prospective, Single-center Study Evaluating the Effectiveness of Endo.Adm in Improving the Quality of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

We intend to develop intelligent quality control and management software based on the work of digestive endoscopic artificial intelligence in the Department of Gastroenterology, Wuhan University Renmin Hospital, to accurately and comprehensively assess the quality of gastrointestinal endoscopy and to provide a practical basis for improving the quality of digestive endoscopy in our endoscopic center.

Being tested
Quality audit and feedback, Control

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Quality audit and feedbackBehavioural

    Endoscopists received quality report generated by Endo.Adm.

  • ControlBehavioural

    None feedback.

Study groups in NCT04654247
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Control groupSham comparatorEndoscopists in control group were informed standard quality indicators requirements and the corresponding references during informed consent.
Receives: Behavioral: Control
Feedback groupExperimentalEndoscopists in feedback group were informed standard quality indicators requirements and the corresponding references during informed consent. In addition to the quality requirements, endoscopists randomized to feedback group received customized quality reports feedback from Endo.Adm weekly.
Receives: Behavioral: Quality audit and feedback

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Adenoma detection rate

    ADR was calculated by dividing the total number of patients being detected adenomas by the number of colonoscopies.

    Measured: 3 Months

  2. Gastric precancerous detection rate

    GPCs detection rate was calculated by dividing the total number of patients being detected gastric precancerous by the number of gastroscopies.

    Measured: 3 Months

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Adcanced ADR

    Adcanced ADR was calculated by dividing the total number of patients being detected ≥10mm in size, or adenomas with histopathology of tubulovillous, villous, adenocarcinoma, or high-grade dysplasia by the number of colonoscopies.

    Measured: 3 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted4 Dec 2020
  2. Study start20 Apr 2019
  3. Primary completion20 Aug 2019
  4. Study completion25 Nov 2019

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
17 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04654247
Sponsor's protocol ID
EA-19-004
Status last verified
Nov 2020
First submitted
27 Nov 2020
Last updated
4 Dec 2020
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided: Individual de-identified participant data that underlie the results reported in this article and study protocol will be shared for investigators whose proposed use of the data has been approved by an independent review committee. Data can only be used to achieve aims in the approved proposal. Data disclosure begins 9 months and ends 36 months after article publication. To gain access, data requesters will need to sign a data access agreement. Proposals should be directed to the corresponding author.

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Quality audit and feedback in people with Adenoma Colon and Gastric Precancerous Condition, run by Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University at 1 site in China.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 13 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Dec 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Adenoma detection rate (time frame: 3 Months). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Dec 2020.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in