AzTrials
AzTrials

Asthma in ChildrenNCT04656587

BPAP in Pediatric Asthma Pilot Study

A study testing Philips Respironics V60 Non-invasive ventilator, BPAP and Standard Therapy in people with Asthma in Children and Status Asthmaticus, run by Columbia University.

Withdrawn

Withdrawn. The study stopped before anyone enrolled.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The investigators aim to study the effect and safety of bilevel positive airway pressure (BPAP) in children with moderate to severe asthma exacerbations - by examining the effects of early initiation of BPAP in pediatric patients who present to the emergency room with a moderate to severe asthma exacerbation. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 5 to 17 years
Conditions the study is for
Asthma in Children, Status Asthmaticus
What is being tested?
Philips Respironics V60 Non-invasive ventilator, BPAP and Standard Therapy
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
0 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
15 Jan 2021to 27 Jul 2022
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 5 to 17 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child

Who may be able to join

  • 5 to 17 years of age (inclusive) presenting to the Emergency Department (ED) with an asthma exacerbation
  • Prior clinician diagnosis of asthma
  • PRAM score of 4 or greater after initial albuterol/atrovent back to backs, steroids, +/- oxygen
  • Need for continuous nebulized albuterol therapy

Who cannot join

  • Hypercapneic respiratory failure (partial pressure of carbon dioxide > 60 mmHg)
  • Hypoxemic respiratory failure (SaO2 < 90% with fraction of inspired oxygen > 0.35)
  • Presence of a tracheostomy or baseline noninvasive ventilation requirement
  • Non-asthma causes of wheezing (foreign body, tracheomalacia, vocal cord dysfunction, pulmonary edema, uncorrected congenital heart disease, cystic fibrosis)
  • Contra-indication to BPAP (facial trauma, uncontrollable vomiting, hypotension for age, Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) 8 or less, drowsiness or confusion, known or clinical suspicion for pneumothorax, pneumomediastinum, or subcutaneous emphysema, pregnancy, current weight < 20kg)

About this study

Official title: Bilevel Positive Airway Pressure (BPAP) in Pediatric Asthma Exacerbations: A Pilot Study

The investigators aim to study the effect and safety of bilevel positive airway pressure (BPAP) in children with moderate to severe asthma exacerbations - by examining the effects of early initiation of BPAP in pediatric patients who present to the emergency room with a moderate to severe asthma exacerbation. The study is interested in how early initiation of BPAP affects PRAM scores, vital signs, as well as the total duration of continuous albuterol in the patient population.

Read the detailed description

Asthma is the most common chronic illness of childhood. Bilevel positive airway pressure (BPAP) has been suggested as an adjunct therapy in the setting of moderate to severe asthma exacerbations. It is a form of noninvasive positive pressure ventilation that provides both an inspiratory positive airway pressure (IPAP) as well as an expiratory positive airway pressure (EPAP).

The goal of this study is to determine the feasibility of enrolling, randomizing, and completing data collection in at least 30 participants over a one-year period. The investigators will enroll children 5 to 17 years of age presenting to the emergency department with a moderate to severe asthma exacerbation. Eligible participants will be randomized into two groups: standard therapy (continuous albuterol) or standard therapy plus BPAP. The following data will be collected: Pediatric Respiratory Assessment Measure (PRAM) score at 0, 2 and 4 hours, vital signs at 0, 2 and 4 hours, rate of adverse events and Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU) admissions, duration continuous albuterol, length of hospital stay, and rates of intubations or deaths.

Being tested
Philips Respironics V60 Non-invasive ventilator, BPAP, Standard Therapy
Keywords
non-invasive ventilation, BPAP, continous albuterol, pediatrics
Medical subject headings
Status Asthmaticus

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Philips Respironics V60 Non-invasive ventilator, BPAPDevice

    Also called Philips Respironics V60 Non-invasive ventilator

    Continuous albuterol will be administered through the BPAP circuit.

  • Standard TherapyOther

    Standard status asthmaticus therapy with continuous beta-agonist, steroids and oxygen as needed.

Study groups in NCT04656587
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Standard Therapy (Control)OtherStandard status asthmaticus therapy with continuous beta-agonist, steroids and oxygen as needed.
Receives: Other: Standard Therapy
Standard Therapy plus BPAPExperimentalApplication of BPAP along with standard status asthmaticus therapy with continuous beta-agonist, steroids and oxygen as needed.
Receives: Device: Philips Respironics V60 Non-invasive ventilator, BPAP; Other: Standard Therapy

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Feasibility of successfully enrolling, randomizing, and completing data collection in 30 participants within one year.

    Feasibility defined as successfully enrolling, randomizing, and completing data collection in 30 participants within one year in the pediatric emergency department.

    Measured: One year

Secondary outcomes (8)
  1. Difference in PRAM Score

    Difference in PRAM scores at 2 and 4 hours. PRAM scores range from 0 to 12 with a score of 4 or greater indicating moderate to severe disease. Decreasing scores reflect clinical improvement in response to therapy.

    Measured: At 2 and 4 hour time points

  2. Difference in Respiratory Rate

    Difference in respiratory rate measured in breaths per minute (bpm).

    Measured: At 2 and 4 hour time points

  3. Difference in Oxygen Saturation

    Difference in percent oxygen saturation.

    Measured: At 2 and 4 hour time points

  4. Difference in Heart Rate

    Difference in heart rate measured in beats per minute (bpm).

    Measured: At 2 and 4 hour time points

  5. Difference in Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure

    Difference in systolic and diastolic blood pressure measured in millimeters of mercury (mmHg).

    Measured: At 2 and 4 hour time points

  6. Difference in Duration of continuous beta-agonist therapy

    Difference in duration of continuous beta-agonist therapy measured in hours.

    Measured: Until therapy is completed, approximately 24 hours

  7. Rate of PICU Admission

    Rate of admissions from the Emergency Department (ED) to PICU versus home or to the pediatric floor

    Measured: Until hospital discharge, approximately 2 days

  8. Length of Stay

    Length of stay, measured in days, in the ED, PICU, or hospital

    Measured: Until hospital discharge, approximately 2 days

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted7 Dec 2020
  2. Study start15 Jan 2021
  3. Primary completion27 Jul 2022
  4. Study completion27 Jul 2022

Why it stopped: PI left institution.

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
0 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04656587
Sponsor's protocol ID
AAAS8758
Status last verified
Feb 2023
First submitted
23 Nov 2020
Last updated
14 Feb 2023
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Korang SK, Baker M, Feinberg J, Newth CJ, Khemani RG, Jakobsen JC. Non-invasive positive pressure ventilation for acute asthma in children. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Oct 2;10(10):CD012067. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012067.pub3.

    PubMed 39356050

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Philips Respironics V60 Non-invasive ventilator, BPAP and Standard Therapy in people with Asthma in Children and Status Asthmaticus, run by Columbia University.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: withdrawn, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 Feb 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Feasibility of successfully enrolling, randomizing, and completing data collection in 30 participants within one year. (time frame: One year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04656587, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 Feb 2023.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in