Optimizing a Multi-Modal Intervention to Reduce Health-Risking Sexual Behaviors: Component Selection

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

• Ages 17 years and older
• All sexes
• Healthy volunteers accepted
• Child, Adult, Older adult

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

About this study

Conditions

Sexually Transmitted Infections, Pregnancy, Unplanned, Military Personnel

Being tested

Basic Education ("Education"), Narrative Videos ("Narratives"), Skills Building Videos ("Skills"), Interactive Scenarios ("Scenarios"), Future Life Planning Tool ("Future")

Keywords

Women's Health, Sexual and Reproductive Health, Military, Multiphase Optimization Strategy

Medical subject headings

Sexually Transmitted Diseases, Coitus

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

• Basic Education ("Education")Behavioural

  All participants will receive the basic educational component in the Mission Wellness app. This component will contain text and media (e.g., images, videos) to teach basic SRH topics. The exact information in this component will be determined by an assessment of baseline SRH knowledge at the start of the intervention.

• Narrative Videos ("Narratives")Behavioural

  The narrative video component is a motivation-based component that includes stories of individuals engaging in positive and negative SRH behaviors that lead to either positive or negative outcomes, respectively, in a video format.

• Skills Building Videos ("Skills")Behavioural

  The skills-building videos component is a component rooted in behavioral skills that involves the provision of information on how to perform or engage positive SRH behaviors (e.g., correctly using a condom, what to expect when having a Pap smear) via instructional videos.

• Interactive Scenarios ("Scenarios")Behavioural

  The interactive scenarios are a behavioral skills-building component that walks through conversations surrounding SRH with select individuals (e.g., partner, healthcare provider), providing suggestions on how to have these conversations and why these conversations are important to have.

• Future Life Planning Tool ("Future")Behavioural

  The future life planning tool is a motivation-based component contains a series of questions to help users plan future goals to put current decision making related to SRH into perspective and provide suggestions on how to stay healthy now to be able to achieve those goals later.

• Epidemiological Risk Scenario ("Risk")Behavioural

  The risk component is an information- and motivation-based component with tailored epidemiological risk information about relative risk of contracting a specific STI and/or having an unintended pregnancy. Relative risk information will be determined by adjusting variables within the component (e.g., number of partners within the last month, percent of time using condoms).

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

1. Change in SRH knowledge as assessed by measures of STI Knowledge

   Change in SRH knowledge as assessed by STI Knowledge (Outcome 1) and Pregnancy and Birth Control Knowledge (Outcome 2).

   STI knowledge is measured on a dichotomous (true/false [outcome varies by item]) scale adapted from measures used in Acari's et al (2004) Feasibility and Short-Term Impact of Linked Education and Urine Screening Interventions for Chlamydia and Gonorrhea in Male Army Recruits and Gold's (1997) CD-ROM Technology to Increase Appropriate Self-Care and Preventive Behaviors among Army and Navy Women.

   Measured: Baseline, within 3 weeks post-intervention, and 30-to-90 days post-intervention

2. Change in SRH knowledge as assessed by measures of Pregnancy and Birth Control Knowledge

   Change in SRH knowledge as assessed by STI Knowledge (Outcome 1) and Pregnancy and Birth Control Knowledge (Outcome 2).

   Pregnancy and Birth Control is measured on a dichotomous (true/false [outcome varies by item]) scale adapted from measures used in Frost's et al (2012) Young Adults' Contraceptive Knowledge, Norms, and Attitudes: Associations with Risk of Unintended Pregnancy and Gold's (1997) CD-ROM Technology to Increase Appropriate Self-Care and Preventive Behaviors among Army and Navy Women.

   Measured: Baseline, within 3 weeks post-intervention, and 30-to-90 days post-intervention

3. Change in perceived risk of having a negative SRH outcome as assessed by measures of Perceived Risk

   Change in perceived risk of having a negative SRH outcome assessed by Perceived Risk on an 5-point ordinal scale (from "no risk" [better outcome] to "very high risk" [worse outcome]) adapted from measures used in Gold's (1997) CD-ROM Technology to Increase Appropriate Self-Care and Preventive Behaviors among Army and Navy Women.

   Measured: Baseline, within 3 weeks post-intervention, and 30-to-90 days post-intervention

4. Change in attitudes about SRH as assessed by measures of Condom Attitudes on a likert scale

   Change in attitudes about SRH assessed by the composite Condom Attitudes (Outcome 4 and Outcome 5), composite Birth Control Attitudes (Outcome 6 and Outcome 7), and Norms (Outcome 8).

   Condom Attitudes is a composite score of Outcome 5 and a 7-point likert scale (from "strongly disagree" [1] to "strongly agree" [7; outcome varies by item]) adapted from Crosby's et al (2008) Correct Condom Use Self-Efficacy Scale (CCUSS) and Helweg-Larson and Collins' (1994) UCLA Multidimensional Condom Attitudes Scale (MCAS).

   Measured: Baseline, within 3 weeks post-intervention, and 30-to-90 days post-intervention

5. Change in attitudes about SRH as assessed by measures of Condom Attitudes on an ordinal item

   Change in attitudes about SRH assessed by the composite Condom Attitudes (Outcome 4 and Outcome 5), composite Birth Control Attitudes (Outcome 6 and Outcome 7), and Norms (Outcome 8).

   Condom Attitudes is a composite score of Outcome 4 and a 5-point ordinal item (from "very positive" [better outcome] to "very negative" [worse outcome]) adapted from measures used in Gold's (1997) CD-ROM Technology to Increase Appropriate Self-Care and Preventive Behaviors among Army and Navy Women.

   Measured: Baseline, within 3 weeks post-intervention, and 30-to-90 days post-intervention

6. Change in attitudes about SRH as assessed by measures of Birth Control Attitudes on a likert-type scale

   Change in attitudes about SRH assessed by the composite Condom Attitudes (Outcome 4 and Outcome 5), composite Birth Control Attitudes (Outcome 6 and Outcome 7), and Norms (Outcome 8).

   Birth Control Attitudes is a composite score of Outcome 7 and a 5-point likert-type scale (from "very positive" [better outcome] to "very negative" [worse outcome]) adapted from measures used in Gold's (1997) CD-ROM Technology to Increase Appropriate Self-Care and Preventive Behaviors among Army and Navy Women.

   Measured: Baseline, within 3 weeks post-intervention, and 30-to-90 days post-intervention

7. Change in attitudes about SRH as assessed by measures of Birth Control Attitudes on a likert scale

   Change in attitudes about SRH assessed by the composite Condom Attitudes (Outcome 4 and Outcome 5), composite Birth Control Attitudes (Outcome 6 and Outcome 7), and Norms (Outcome 8).

   Birth Control Attitudes is a composite score of Outcome 6 and a 5-point likert scale (from "strongly agree" [1; worse outcome] to "strongly disagree" [5; better outcome]) adapted from measures used in Guzza and Hayford's (2018) Adolescent Reproductive and Contraceptive Knowledge and Attitudes and Adult Contraceptive Behavior.

   Measured: Baseline, within 3 weeks post-intervention, and 30-to-90 days post-intervention

8. Change in attitudes about SRH as assessed by measures of Norms

   Change in attitudes about SRH assessed by the composite Condom Attitudes (Outcome 4 and Outcome 5), composite Birth Control Attitudes (Outcome 6 and Outcome 7), and Norms (Outcome 8).

   Change in attitudes about SRH assessed by Norms on a 5-point likert scale (from "strongly agree" to "strongly disagree" [no better/worse outcome]) adapted from measures used in Gold's (1997) CD-ROM Technology to Increase Appropriate Self-Care and Preventive Behaviors among Army and Navy Women.

   Measured: Baseline, within 3 weeks post-intervention, and 30-to-90 days post-intervention

9. Change in self-efficacy about SRH as assessed by measures of Condom/Birth Control Use

   Change in self-efficacy about SRH assessed by Condom/Birth Control Use (Outcome 9) and Partner Communication/Negotiation (Outcome 10).

   Change in self-efficacy about SRH assessed by Condom/Birth Control Use on 5-point likert-type scales (from "not at all confident" [1; worse outcome] to "extremely confident" [5; better outcome]) adapted from Crosby's et al (2008) Correct Condom Use Self-Efficacy Scale (CCUSS) and Marin's et al (1997) Condom Self-Efficacy.

   Measured: Baseline, within 3 weeks post-intervention, and 30-to-90 days post-intervention

10. Change in self-efficacy about SRH as assessed by measures of Partner Communication/Negotiation

    Change in self-efficacy about SRH assessed by Condom/Birth Control Use (Outcome 9) and Partner Communication/Negotiation (Outcome 10).

    Change in self-efficacy about SRH assessed by Partner Communication/Negotiation on a 4-point likert-type scale (from "very difficult" [1; worse outcome] to "very easy" [4; better outcome]) adapted from Noar's et al (2002) Condom Influence Strategy Questionnaire and Quinn-Nilas' et al (2016) Sexual Communication Self-Efficacy Scale.

    Measured: Baseline, within 3 weeks post-intervention, and 30-to-90 days post-intervention

11. Change in self-reported sexual behavior as assessed by measures of Sexual Behavior on ordinal items

    Change in sexual behavior assessed by composite Sexual Behavior score (Outcomes 11-16).

    Sexual Behavior is a composite score of Outcomes 12-16 and ordinal (from "never" [worse outcome] to "all the time" [better outcome]) items adapted from measures used in Booth-Kewley's et al (2001) One-Year Follow-Up Evaluation of the Sexually Transmitted Disease/Human Immunodeficiency Virus Intervention Program in a Marine Corps sample.

    Measured: Baseline and 30-to-90 days post-intervention

12. Change in self-reported sexual behavior as assessed by measures of Sexual Behavior on yes/no/dont-know items

    Change in sexual behavior assessed by composite Sexual Behavior score (Outcomes 11-16).

    Sexual Behavior is a composite score of Outcomes 11 and 13-16, and yes/no/dont-know (nominal; outcome varies by item) items adapted from measures used in Acari's et al (2004) Feasibility and Short-Term Impact of Linked Education and Urine Screening Interventions for Chlamydia and Gonorrhea in Male Army Recruits, Hwang's et al (2007) Sexual Behaviors After Universal Screening of Sexually Transmitted Infections in Healthy Young Women, and Booth-Kewley's et al (2001) One-Year Follow-Up Evaluation of the Sexually Transmitted Disease/Human Immunodeficiency Virus Intervention Program in a Marine Corps sample.

    Measured: Baseline and 30-to-90 days post-intervention

13. Change in self-reported sexual behavior as assessed by measures of Sexual Behavior on no/yes,previously/yes,currently items

    Change in sexual behavior assessed by composite Sexual Behavior score (Outcomes 11-16).

    Sexual Behavior is a composite score of Outcomes 11-12 and 14-16 and no/yes,previously/yes,currently (nominal; no better/worse outcome) items adapted from measures used in Acari's et al (2004) Feasibility and Short-Term Impact of Linked Education and Urine Screening Interventions for Chlamydia and Gonorrhea in Male Army Recruits, Hwang's et al (2007) Sexual Behaviors After Universal Screening of Sexually Transmitted Infections in Healthy Young Women, and Booth-Kewley's et al (2001) One-Year Follow-Up Evaluation of the Sexually Transmitted Disease/Human Immunodeficiency Virus Intervention Program in a Marine Corps sample.

    Measured: Baseline and 30-to-90 days post-intervention

14. Change in self-reported sexual behavior as assessed by measures of Sexual Behavior on dichotomous items

    Change in sexual behavior assessed by composite Sexual Behavior score (Outcomes 11-16).

    Sexual Behavior is a composite score of Outcomes 11-13 and 15-16 and dichotomous (yes/no [outcome varies by item]) items adapted from measures used in Acari's et al (2004) Feasibility and Short-Term Impact of Linked Education and Urine Screening Interventions for Chlamydia and Gonorrhea in Male Army Recruits, Hwang's et al (2007) Sexual Behaviors After Universal Screening of Sexually Transmitted Infections in Healthy Young Women, and Booth-Kewley's et al (2001) One-Year Follow-Up Evaluation of the Sexually Transmitted Disease/Human Immunodeficiency Virus Intervention Program in a Marine Corps sample.

    Measured: Baseline and 30-to-90 days post-intervention

15. Change in self-reported sexual behavior as assessed by measures of Sexual Behavior on open response (number input) items

    Change in sexual behavior assessed by composite Sexual Behavior score (Outcomes 11-16).

    Sexual Behavior is a composite score of Outcomes 11-14 and 16 and open response (number input) items adapted from measures used in Acari's et al (2004) Feasibility and Short-Term Impact of Linked Education and Urine Screening Interventions for Chlamydia and Gonorrhea in Male Army Recruits, Hwang's et al (2007) Sexual Behaviors After Universal Screening of Sexually Transmitted Infections in Healthy Young Women, and Booth-Kewley's et al (2001) One-Year Follow-Up Evaluation of the Sexually Transmitted Disease/Human Immunodeficiency Virus Intervention Program in a Marine Corps sample.

    Measured: Baseline and 30-to-90 days post-intervention

16. Change in self-reported sexual behavior as assessed by measures of Sexual Behavior on nominal items

    Change in sexual behavior assessed by composite Sexual Behavior score (Outcomes 11-16).

    Sexual Behavior is a composite score of Outcomes 11-15 and nominal items (main/casual other [no better/worse outcome]) adapted from measures used in Acari's et al (2004) Feasibility and Short-Term Impact of Linked Education and Urine Screening Interventions for Chlamydia and Gonorrhea in Male Army Recruits, Hwang's et al (2007) Sexual Behaviors After Universal Screening of Sexually Transmitted Infections in Healthy Young Women, and Booth-Kewley's et al (2001) One-Year Follow-Up Evaluation of the Sexually Transmitted Disease/Human Immunodeficiency Virus Intervention Program in a Marine Corps sample.

    Measured: Baseline and 30-to-90 days post-intervention

17. Change in self-reported sexual behavior as assessed by measures of Sexual Behavioral Intentions on ordinal items

    Change in sexual behavior assessed by composite Sexual Behavioral Intentions (Outcomes 17-21).

    Sexual Behavior Intentions is a composite score of Outcomes 18-21 and 5-point ordinal (from "never" [worse outcome] to "all of the time" [better outcome]) items adapted from measures used in Acari's et al (2004) Feasibility and Short-Term Impact of Linked Education and Urine Screening Interventions for Chlamydia and Gonorrhea in Male Army Recruits, Hwang's et al (2007) Sexual Behaviors After Universal Screening of Sexually Transmitted Infections in Healthy Young Women, and Booth-Kewley's et al (2001) One-Year Follow-Up Evaluation of the Sexually Transmitted Disease/Human Immunodeficiency Virus Intervention Program in a Marine Corps sample.

    Measured: Within 3 weeks post-intervention

18. Change in self-reported sexual behavior as assessed by measures of Sexual Behavioral Intentions on yes/no/dont-know items

    Change in sexual behavior assessed by composite Sexual Behavioral Intentions (Outcomes 17-21).

    Sexual Behavior Intentions is a composite score of Outcomes 17 and 19-21 and nominal (yes/no/dont-know [outcome varies by item]) items adapted from measures used in Acari's et al (2004) Feasibility and Short-Term Impact of Linked Education and Urine Screening Interventions for Chlamydia and Gonorrhea in Male Army Recruits, Hwang's et al (2007) Sexual Behaviors After Universal Screening of Sexually Transmitted Infections in Healthy Young Women, and Booth-Kewley's et al (2001) One-Year Follow-Up Evaluation of the Sexually Transmitted Disease/Human Immunodeficiency Virus Intervention Program in a Marine Corps sample.

    Measured: Within 3 weeks post-intervention

19. Change in self-reported sexual behavior as assessed by measures of Sexual Behavioral Intentions on dichotomous items

    Change in sexual behavior assessed by composite Sexual Behavioral Intentions (Outcomes 17-21).

    Sexual Behavior Intentions is a composite score of Outcomes 17-18 and 20-21 and dichotomous (yes/no [outcome varies by item]) items adapted from measures used in Acari's et al (2004) Feasibility and Short-Term Impact of Linked Education and Urine Screening Interventions for Chlamydia and Gonorrhea in Male Army Recruits, Hwang's et al (2007) Sexual Behaviors After Universal Screening of Sexually Transmitted Infections in Healthy Young Women, and Booth-Kewley's et al (2001) One-Year Follow-Up Evaluation of the Sexually Transmitted Disease/Human Immunodeficiency Virus Intervention Program in a Marine Corps sample.

    Measured: Within 3 weeks post-intervention

20. Change in self-reported sexual behavior as assessed by measures of Sexual Behavioral Intentions on open response (number input) items

    Change in sexual behavior assessed by composite Sexual Behavioral Intentions (Outcomes 17-21).

    Sexual Behavior Intentions is a composite score of Outcomes 17-19 and 21 and open response (number input) items adapted from measures used in Acari's et al (2004) Feasibility and Short-Term Impact of Linked Education and Urine Screening Interventions for Chlamydia and Gonorrhea in Male Army Recruits, Hwang's et al (2007) Sexual Behaviors After Universal Screening of Sexually Transmitted Infections in Healthy Young Women, and Booth-Kewley's et al (2001) One-Year Follow-Up Evaluation of the Sexually Transmitted Disease/Human Immunodeficiency Virus Intervention Program in a Marine Corps sample.

    Measured: Within 3 weeks post-intervention

21. Change in self-reported sexual behavior as assessed by measures of Sexual Behavioral Intentions

    Change in sexual behavior assessed by composite Sexual Behavioral Intentions (Outcomes 17-21).

    Sexual Behavior Intentions is a composite score of Outcomes 17-20 and a 7-point likert-type (from "definitely" [better outcome] to "not likely at all" [worse outcome]) scale adapted from measures used in Acari's et al (2004) Feasibility and Short-Term Impact of Linked Education and Urine Screening Interventions for Chlamydia and Gonorrhea in Male Army Recruits, Hwang's et al (2007) Sexual Behaviors After Universal Screening of Sexually Transmitted Infections in Healthy Young Women, and Booth-Kewley's et al (2001) One-Year Follow-Up Evaluation of the Sexually Transmitted Disease/Human Immunodeficiency Virus Intervention Program in a Marine Corps sample.

    Measured: Within 3 weeks post-intervention

22. Quality and satisfaction of healthcare experiences as assessed by measures of Health Care on ordinal items (from "very helpful" to "not helpful at all")

    Quality and satisfaction of healthcare experiences assessed by composite Health Care (Outcomes 22-27).

    Health Care is a composite score of Outcomes 23-27 and on 5-point ordinal or likert-type (from "very helpful" [better outcome] to "not helpful at all" [worse outcome]) items adapted from measures used in Gold's (1997) CD-ROM Technology to Increase Appropriate Self-Care and Preventive Behaviors among Army and Navy Women.

    Measured: Baseline and 30-to-90 days post-intervention

23. Quality and satisfaction of healthcare experiences as assessed by measures of Health Care on ordinal items (from "strongly agree" to "strongly disagree")

    Quality and satisfaction of healthcare experiences assessed by composite Health Care (Outcomes 22-27).

    Health Care is a composite score of Outcomes 22 and 24-27 and on 5-point ordinal or likert-type (from "strongly agree" [better outcome] to "strongly disagree" [worse outcome]) items adapted from measures used in Gold's (1997) CD-ROM Technology to Increase Appropriate Self-Care and Preventive Behaviors among Army and Navy Women.

    Measured: Baseline and 30-to-90 days post-intervention

24. Quality and satisfaction of healthcare experiences as assessed by measures of Health Care on ordinal items (from "to much" to "some to little")

    Quality and satisfaction of healthcare experiences assessed by composite Health Care (Outcomes 22-27).

    Health Care is a composite score of Outcomes 22-23 and 25-27 and on 5-point ordinal or likert-type (from "too much" to "some too little" [no better/worse outcome]) items adapted from measures used in Gold's (1997) CD-ROM Technology to Increase Appropriate Self-Care and Preventive Behaviors among Army and Navy Women.

    Measured: Baseline and 30-to-90 days post-intervention

25. Quality and satisfaction of healthcare experiences as assessed by measures of Health Care on yes/no/dont-know nominal items

    Quality and satisfaction of healthcare experiences assessed by composite Health Care (Outcomes 22-27).

    Health Care is a composite score of Outcomes 22-24 and 26-27 and yes/no/dont-know (no better/worse outcome) items adapted from measures used in Gold's (1997) CD-ROM Technology to Increase Appropriate Self-Care and Preventive Behaviors among Army and Navy Women.

    Measured: Baseline and 30-to-90 days post-intervention

26. Quality and satisfaction of healthcare experiences as assessed by measures of Health Care on no/yes,recent/yes,not-recent nominal items

    Quality and satisfaction of healthcare experiences assessed by composite Health Care (Outcomes 22-27).

    Health Care is a composite score of Outcomes 22-25 and 27 and no/yes,recent/yes,not-recent (no better/worse outcome) nominal items adapted from measures used in Gold's (1997) CD-ROM Technology to Increase Appropriate Self-Care and Preventive Behaviors among Army and Navy Women.

    Measured: Baseline and 30-to-90 days post-intervention

27. Quality and satisfaction of healthcare experiences as assessed by measures of Health Care on a cumulative scale

    Quality and satisfaction of healthcare experiences assessed by composite Health Care (Outcomes 22-27).

    Health Care is a composite score of Outcomes 22 and 24-26 and a cumulative (outcome varies by item) scales adapted from measures used in Gold's (1997) CD-ROM Technology to Increase Appropriate Self-Care and Preventive Behaviors among Army and Navy Women.

    Measured: Baseline and 30-to-90 days post-intervention

28. Quality and satisfaction of healthcare provider interactions as assessed by measures of Patient-Provider Communication

    Quality and satisfaction of healthcare provider interactions as assessed by Patient-Provider Communication on a 5-point likert-type scale (from "I do not agree" [worse outcome] to "I fully agree" [better outcome]) adapted from Bieber's et al (2010) Questionnaire on the Quality of Physician-Patient Interaction (QQPPI)

    Measured: Baseline

29. Change in self-reported mental health as assessed by Depression (PHQ-2)

    Change in mental health assessed by Depression on the Patient Health Questionnaire-2 (PHQ-2) (from "not at all" [better outcome] to "nearly every day" [worse outcome])

    Measured: Baseline and 30-to-90 days post-intervention

30. Change in self-reported mental health as assessed by Anxiety (HAI)

    Change in mental health assessed by the Anxiety on the Health Anxiety Inventory (HAI)

    Measured: Baseline and 30-to-90 days post-intervention

31. Intervention acceptability as assessed by measures on Acceptability

    Acceptability of the intervention assessed by composite measures on Acceptability (Outcomes 31-33).

    Acceptability is a composite score of Outcome 32-33 and a 5-point ordinal or likert-type scale (from "do not agree at all" [worse outcome] to "agree completely" [better outcome]) adapted from Stoyanov's et al (2015) Mobile App Rating Scale and measures used in Acari's et al (2004) Feasibility and Short-Term Impact of Linked Education and Urine Screening Interventions for Chlamydia and Gonorrhea in Male Army Recruits and Kelley's et al (2005) An Evaluation of a Sexual Assault Prevention and Advocacy Program for US Navy Personnel.

    Measured: Within 3 weeks post-intervention

32. Intervention acceptability as assessed by measures on Acceptability as open-ended items

    Acceptability of the intervention assessed by composite measures on Acceptability (Outcomes 31-33).

    Acceptability is a composite score of Outcome 31 and 33 and open-ended items adapted from Stoyanov's et al (2015) Mobile App Rating Scale and measures used in Acari's et al (2004) Feasibility and Short-Term Impact of Linked Education and Urine Screening Interventions for Chlamydia and Gonorrhea in Male Army Recruits and Kelley's et al (2005) An Evaluation of a Sexual Assault Prevention and Advocacy Program for US Navy Personnel.

    Measured: Within 3 weeks post-intervention

33. Intervention acceptability as assessed by measures on Acceptability on a rating scale

    Acceptability of the intervention assessed by composite measures on Acceptability (Outcomes 31-33).

    Acceptability is a composite score of Outcome 31-32 and a rating scale (from 1 ["not at all likely"; worse outcome] to 10 ["extremely likely"; better outcome]) adapted from Stoyanov's et al (2015) Mobile App Rating Scale and measures used in Acari's et al (2004) Feasibility and Short-Term Impact of Linked Education and Urine Screening Interventions for Chlamydia and Gonorrhea in Male Army Recruits and Kelley's et al (2005) An Evaluation of a Sexual Assault Prevention and Advocacy Program for US Navy Personnel.

    Measured: Within 3 weeks post-intervention

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

1. First posted10 Dec 2020
2. Study start2 Sep 2021
3. Primary completion9 Dec 2022
4. Study completion9 Dec 2022

Resources

• Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
• Other trials for Sexually Transmitted InfectionsStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
• What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.