Cubital Tunnel SyndromePHONESNCT04662320
Promoting Healing of Nerves Through Electrical Stimulation
A study testing Checkpoint BEST System in people with Cubital Tunnel Syndrome and Nerve Compression, run by Checkpoint Surgical Inc. at 5 sites in United States.
Trial summary
This study is evaluating a new therapeutic use of electrical stimulation to promote nerve healing and improve functional recovery following surgical intervention for nerve compression. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Cubital Tunnel Syndrome, Nerve Compression, Nerve Injury
- What is being tested?
- Checkpoint BEST System
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 100 participants
- Where
- 5 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- 1 Sep 2021to Dec 2025
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Electrodiagnostic evidence of ulnar neuropathy at the elbow.
- Are candidates for surgical intervention.
- Evidence of motor involvement such as intrinsic muscle atrophy or weakness.
- Are age 18-80 years.
- Signed and dated informed consent form.
Who cannot join
- Severe comorbid condition, such as arrythmia or congestive heart failure, preventing surgery
- Previous history or current transection of ulnar nerve, or concomitant upper extremity nerve injury
- Global peripheral neuropathy affecting the hands
- Age less than 18 or greater than 80 years
- Un-affected hand maximum grip strength <12kg
Trial locations and contacts
5 sites in 1 country.
5 sites in 1 country
United States5 sites
Northwestern Feinberg School of Medicine - Department of Orthopaedic Surgery
Chicago, Illinois, 60611
The Ohio State Univeristy - Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
Columbus, Ohio, 43212
Medical College of Wisconsin - Hand Center
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 53226
Washington University in St. Louis
St Louis, Missouri, 63110
Stanford University
Stanford, California, 94304
About this study
This study is evaluating a new therapeutic use of electrical stimulation to promote nerve healing and improve functional recovery following surgical intervention for nerve compression. A single dose of the therapeutic stimulation is delivered as part of the surgical intervention to address compression of the ulnar nerve at the elbow.
Read the detailed description
Preliminary research has shown that delivering a brief period of electrical stimulation following nerve repair promotes nerve healing and functional recovery. This study is investigating the use of a single dose of therapeutic electrical stimulation to promote nerve healing. The therapy is delivered as part of the surgical intervention to address compression of the ulnar nerve at the elbow, commonly referred to as Cubital Tunnel Syndrome.
- Being tested
- Checkpoint BEST System
- Keywords
- Therapeutic Electrical Stimulation, Nerve Regeneration, Nerve Healing, Nerve Injury, Cubital Tunnel, Ulnar Nerve
- Medical subject headings
- Cubital Tunnel Syndrome, Neuroma, Ulnar Neuropathies
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Checkpoint BEST SystemDevice
Also called Brief Electrical Stimulation (BES) Therapy
Single use medical device, consisting of electric stimulator and intraoperative lead. Therapy consists of single, 10 minute dose delivered proximal to site of decompression/repair.
Other Name: Checkpoint BEST System
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Brief Electrical Stimulation | Experimental | Single, 10 minute dose of electrical stimulation delivered to the ulnar nerve during surgical intervention for cubital tunnel decompression. Receives: Device: Checkpoint BEST System |
| Standard of Care | No intervention | Surgical intervention for cubital tunnel decompression. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in Grip Strength at 1 year.
Change in grip strength at 1 year from baseline (pre-operative) assessment.
Measured: 1 year
Secondary outcomes (11)
Grip Strength
Maximum grip strength
Measured: Pre-surgery, 6 weeks, 3 months, 5 months, 7 months, 9 months, and 1 year
Lateral Pinch Strength
Maximum lateral pinch strength
Measured: Pre-surgery, 6 weeks, 3 months, 5 months, 7 months, 9 months, and 1 year
2-point discrimination
Evaluation of sensory function, measuring tactile discrimination.
Measured: Pre-surgery, 6 weeks, 3 months, 5 months, 7 months, 9 months, and 1 year
Semmes-Weinstein Monofilament Testing
Evaluation of sensory function, measuring pressure detection threshold.
Measured: Pre-surgery, 6 weeks, 3 months, 5 months, 7 months, 9 months, and 1 year
Medical Research Council (MRC) motor grading.
Grading of muscle strength on 0 to 5 scale, with higher score representing greater function.
Measured: Pre-surgery, 6 weeks, 3 months, 5 months, 7 months, 9 months, and 1 year
Maximal finger spread measurement.
Measurement of maximal finger spread.
Measured: Pre-surgery, 6 weeks, 3 months, 5 months, 7 months, 9 months, and 1 year
Patient Reported Outcome Measurement System (PROMIS) Upper Extremity Function
Questionnaire providing patient reported estimate of upper extremity function on a 0-100 scale with >50 representing greater normal function.
Measured: Pre-surgery, 10 days, 6 weeks, 3 months, 5 months, 7 months, 9 months, and 1 year
Patient Reported Outcome Measurement System (PROMIS) Pain Interference
Questionnaire providing patient reported estimate of interference of pain on daily activities on a 0-100 scale with >50 representing greater than normal pain interference on daily activities.
Measured: Pre-surgery, 10 days, 6 weeks, 3 months, 5 months, 7 months, 9 months, and 1 year
Michigan Hand Questionnaire (MHQ)
MHQ is a patient reported estimate of hand function on a 0-100 scale with a higher number indication greater hand function.
Measured: Pre-surgery, 10 days, 6 weeks, 3 months, 5 months, 7 months, 9 months, and 1 year
Nerve Conduction Velocity (NCV)
Measurement of how quickly an electrical impulse moves along the nerve.
Measured: Pre-surgery, 3 months, and 7 months
Electromyography (EMG)
Measurement of the electrical activity in a muscle.
Measured: Pre-surgery, 3 months, and 7 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted10 Dec 2020
- Study start1 Sep 2021
- Primary completionDec 2025 (estimated)
- Study completionDec 2025 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (7)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Cubital Tunnel SyndromeStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 100 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Checkpoint Surgical Inc.
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Congressionally Directed Medical Research Programs
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Amy M Moore, MD, Principal investigator, The Ohio State Univeristy Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04662320
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 0153-CSP-001
- Other IDs
- W81XWH1920065
- Acronym
- PHONES
- Status last verified
- Dec 2024
- First submitted
- 24 Nov 2020
- Last updated
- 5 Dec 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Saffari TM, Walker ER, Pet MA, Moore AM. Brief Intraoperative Electrical Stimulation to Enhance Nerve Regeneration. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2024 Apr 10;12(4):e5730. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000005730. eCollection 2024 Apr. No abstract available.
PubMed 38600968Power HA, Morhart MJ, Olson JL, Chan KM. Postsurgical Electrical Stimulation Enhances Recovery Following Surgery for Severe Cubital Tunnel Syndrome: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial. Neurosurgery. 2020 Jun 1;86(6):769-777. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyz322.
PubMed 31432080Gordon T, Amirjani N, Edwards DC, Chan KM. Brief post-surgical electrical stimulation accelerates axon regeneration and muscle reinnervation without affecting the functional measures in carpal tunnel syndrome patients. Exp Neurol. 2010 May;223(1):192-202. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2009.09.020. Epub 2009 Oct 1.
PubMed 19800329Jo S, Pan D, Halevi AE, Roh J, Schellhardt L, Hunter Ra DA, Snyder-Warwick AK, Moore AM, Mackinnon SE, Wood MD. Comparing electrical stimulation and tacrolimus (FK506) to enhance treating nerve injuries. Muscle Nerve. 2019 Nov;60(5):629-636. doi: 10.1002/mus.26659. Epub 2019 Aug 21.
PubMed 31397919Evans A, Padovano WM, Patterson JMM, Wood MD, Fongsri W, Kennedy CR, Mackinnon SE. Beyond the Cubital Tunnel: Use of Adjunctive Procedures in the Management of Cubital Tunnel Syndrome. Hand (N Y). 2023 Mar;18(2):203-213. doi: 10.1177/1558944721998022. Epub 2021 Apr 2.
PubMed 33794683Sayanagi J, Acevedo-Cintron JA, Pan D, Schellhardt L, Hunter DA, Snyder-Warwick AK, Mackinnon SE, Wood MD. Brief Electrical Stimulation Accelerates Axon Regeneration and Promotes Recovery Following Nerve Transection and Repair in Mice. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2021 Oct 20;103(20):e80. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.20.01965.
PubMed 34668879Roh J, Schellhardt L, Keane GC, Hunter DA, Moore AM, Snyder-Warwick AK, Mackinnon SE, Wood MD. Short-Duration, Pulsatile, Electrical Stimulation Therapy Accelerates Axon Regeneration and Recovery following Tibial Nerve Injury and Repair in Rats. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2022 Apr 1;149(4):681e-690e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000008924.
PubMed 35139047
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 5 Dec 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Promoting Healing of Nerves Through Electrical Stimulation
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04662320
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- PHONES / 0153-CSP-001
- Keywords
- Therapeutic Electrical Stimulation, Nerve Regeneration, Nerve Healing, Nerve Injury, Cubital Tunnel, Ulnar Nerve
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Active, not recruiting
- Enrolment
- 100 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Checkpoint Surgical Inc.Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Congressionally Directed Medical Research Programs
- Study start
- 1 Sep 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Dec 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Dec 2025 (estimated)
- First posted
- 10 Dec 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study is evaluating a new therapeutic use of electrical stimulation to promote nerve healing and improve functional recovery following surgical intervention for nerve compression. A single dose of the therapeutic stimulation is delivered as part of the surgical intervention to address compression of the ulnar nerve at the elbow.
Detailed description
Preliminary research has shown that delivering a brief period of electrical stimulation following nerve repair promotes nerve healing and functional recovery. This study is investigating the use of a single dose of therapeutic electrical stimulation to promote nerve healing. The therapy is delivered as part of the surgical intervention to address compression of the ulnar nerve at the elbow, commonly referred to as Cubital Tunnel Syndrome.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Brief Electrical Stimulation | Experimental | Device: Checkpoint BEST SystemSingle, 10 minute dose of electrical stimulation delivered to the ulnar nerve during surgical intervention for cubital tunnel decompression. |
| Standard of Care | No intervention | –Surgical intervention for cubital tunnel decompression. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Electrodiagnostic evidence of ulnar neuropathy at the elbow.
- Are candidates for surgical intervention.
- Evidence of motor involvement such as intrinsic muscle atrophy or weakness.
- Are age 18-80 years.
- Signed and dated informed consent form.
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Severe comorbid condition, such as arrythmia or congestive heart failure, preventing surgery
- Previous history or current transection of ulnar nerve, or concomitant upper extremity nerve injury
- Global peripheral neuropathy affecting the hands
- Age less than 18 or greater than 80 years
- Un-affected hand maximum grip strength <12kg
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Checkpoint BEST SystemAlso: Brief Electrical Stimulation (BES) TherapySingle use medical device, consisting of electric stimulator and intraoperative lead. Therapy consists of single, 10 minute dose delivered proximal to site of decompression/repair. Other Name: Checkpoint BEST System | Device | Brief Electrical Stimulation |
Primary outcome
Change in Grip Strength at 1 year.
Time frame: 1 year
Change in grip strength at 1 year from baseline (pre-operative) assessment.
11 secondary outcomes
Grip Strength
Time frame: Pre-surgery, 6 weeks, 3 months, 5 months, 7 months, 9 months, and 1 year
Lateral Pinch Strength
Time frame: Pre-surgery, 6 weeks, 3 months, 5 months, 7 months, 9 months, and 1 year
2-point discrimination
Time frame: Pre-surgery, 6 weeks, 3 months, 5 months, 7 months, 9 months, and 1 year
Semmes-Weinstein Monofilament Testing
Time frame: Pre-surgery, 6 weeks, 3 months, 5 months, 7 months, 9 months, and 1 year
Medical Research Council (MRC) motor grading.
Time frame: Pre-surgery, 6 weeks, 3 months, 5 months, 7 months, 9 months, and 1 year
Maximal finger spread measurement.
Time frame: Pre-surgery, 6 weeks, 3 months, 5 months, 7 months, 9 months, and 1 year
Patient Reported Outcome Measurement System (PROMIS) Upper Extremity Function
Time frame: Pre-surgery, 10 days, 6 weeks, 3 months, 5 months, 7 months, 9 months, and 1 year
Patient Reported Outcome Measurement System (PROMIS) Pain Interference
Time frame: Pre-surgery, 10 days, 6 weeks, 3 months, 5 months, 7 months, 9 months, and 1 year
Michigan Hand Questionnaire (MHQ)
Time frame: Pre-surgery, 10 days, 6 weeks, 3 months, 5 months, 7 months, 9 months, and 1 year
Nerve Conduction Velocity (NCV)
Time frame: Pre-surgery, 3 months, and 7 months
Electromyography (EMG)
Time frame: Pre-surgery, 3 months, and 7 months
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 5 Dec 2024.
- Background: PubMed 38600968Saffari TM, Walker ER, Pet MA, Moore AM. Brief Intraoperative Electrical Stimulation to Enhance Nerve Regeneration. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2024 Apr 10;12(4):e5730. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000005730. eCollection 2024 Apr. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 31432080Power HA, Morhart MJ, Olson JL, Chan KM. Postsurgical Electrical Stimulation Enhances Recovery Following Surgery for Severe Cubital Tunnel Syndrome: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial. Neurosurgery. 2020 Jun 1;86(6):769-777. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyz322.
- Background: PubMed 19800329Gordon T, Amirjani N, Edwards DC, Chan KM. Brief post-surgical electrical stimulation accelerates axon regeneration and muscle reinnervation without affecting the functional measures in carpal tunnel syndrome patients. Exp Neurol. 2010 May;223(1):192-202. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2009.09.020. Epub 2009 Oct 1.
- Background: PubMed 31397919Jo S, Pan D, Halevi AE, Roh J, Schellhardt L, Hunter Ra DA, Snyder-Warwick AK, Moore AM, Mackinnon SE, Wood MD. Comparing electrical stimulation and tacrolimus (FK506) to enhance treating nerve injuries. Muscle Nerve. 2019 Nov;60(5):629-636. doi: 10.1002/mus.26659. Epub 2019 Aug 21.
- Background: PubMed 33794683Evans A, Padovano WM, Patterson JMM, Wood MD, Fongsri W, Kennedy CR, Mackinnon SE. Beyond the Cubital Tunnel: Use of Adjunctive Procedures in the Management of Cubital Tunnel Syndrome. Hand (N Y). 2023 Mar;18(2):203-213. doi: 10.1177/1558944721998022. Epub 2021 Apr 2.
- Background: PubMed 34668879Sayanagi J, Acevedo-Cintron JA, Pan D, Schellhardt L, Hunter DA, Snyder-Warwick AK, Mackinnon SE, Wood MD. Brief Electrical Stimulation Accelerates Axon Regeneration and Promotes Recovery Following Nerve Transection and Repair in Mice. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2021 Oct 20;103(20):e80. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.20.01965.
- Background: PubMed 35139047Roh J, Schellhardt L, Keane GC, Hunter DA, Moore AM, Snyder-Warwick AK, Mackinnon SE, Wood MD. Short-Duration, Pulsatile, Electrical Stimulation Therapy Accelerates Axon Regeneration and Recovery following Tibial Nerve Injury and Repair in Rats. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2022 Apr 1;149(4):681e-690e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000008924.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Cubital Tunnel Syndrome
Not yet recruiting
Comparing Surgical and Nonsurgical Outcomes of Cubital Tunnel Syndrome
Cubital Tunnel Syndrome
Recruiting
Comparison of Kinesio Taping Techniques in Ulnar Nerve Entrapment
Ulnar Nerve Entrapment, Cubital Tunnel Syndrome
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Early Functional Response as a Predictor of Clinical Outcomes in Hand Rehabilitation: A Prospective Feasibility Study Using a Digital Monitoring System
Hand, Hand Therapy
Recruiting
Conditioning Electrical Stimulation to Improve Outcomes in Cubital Tunnel Syndrome
Cubital Tunnel Syndrome, Electrical Stimulation
Recruiting
Investigation of the Effectiveness of Kinesiological Taping in Cubital Tunnel Syndrome
Cubital Tunnel Syndrome, Kinesio Taping
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Amy M Moore, MD principal investigator
The Ohio State Univeristy Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
5 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Checkpoint BEST System in people with Cubital Tunnel Syndrome and Nerve Compression, run by Checkpoint Surgical Inc. at 5 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Dec 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 5 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in Grip Strength at 1 year. (time frame: 1 year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04662320, which also lists 7 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Dec 2024.