GlomerulonephritisPhase 4CLIgANNCT04662723
Multicentre Clinical Study to Evaluate the Effect of Personalized Therapy on Patients With Immunoglobulin A Nephropathy.
A Phase 4 study testing Corticosteroid, Renin-angiotensin sytem blockers and Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor in people with Glomerulonephritis and Immunoglobulin A Nephropathy, run by Fondazione Schena at 2 sites in Italy.
Trial summary
Idiopathic immunoglobulin A nephropathy (IgAN) is the most common biopsy-proven glomerulonephritis in the world. Approximately 40% of IgAN patients reach end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) 20 years after their kidney biopsy. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Glomerulonephritis, Immunoglobulin A Nephropathy
- What is being tested?
- Corticosteroid, Renin-angiotensin sytem blockers and Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine, Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 878 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesItaly
- Study dates
- 1 May 2023to 31 Dec 2028
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Only adult patients (age 18-70 years) with biopsy-proven idiopathic IgAN.
- IgAN patients with active or chronic or moderate renal lesions
Who cannot join
- Patients with idiopathic IgAN and nephrotic syndrome (minimal change disease at kidney biopsy)
- IgAN patients with hematuria and acute renal failure
- IgAN patients with rapidly progressive glomerulonephritis (extracapillary lesions in more than 50% of glomeruli)
- Patients with secondary IgAN (lupus nephritis, Schoenlein-Henoch purpura, liver cirrhosis)
- Any prior immunosuppressive therapy
- Superimposed IgAN in kidney transplant
Show all 17Show fewer
- Severe liver diseases
- Infections
- Malignancies
- Pregnancy
- Patients with myocardial infarction or cerebrovascular stroke in the previous 6 months
- Uncontrolled diabetes
- Aseptic necrosis of any bone
- Other conditions that can be exacerbated by corticosteroids
- Previous adverse side effects to RASBs
- Previous adverse side effects to SGLT2is
- Patients with mild renal lesions (M0,E0,S0,T0,C0), minor urinary findings, proteinuria < 0.5 g/day, normal GFR and normal blood pressure
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Italy2 sites, 2 recruiting
- Recruiting
francesco paolo Schena
Bari, BA, 70124
Francesco P Schena, MD, 3336771291, paolo.schena@uniba.it
- Recruiting
francesco paolo Schena
Bari, BA, 70124
francesco P Schena, 3336771291, fp.schena@gmail.com
About this study
Official title: Multicentre Prospective Open Label Clinical Study to Evaluate the Effect of Personalized Therapy on Patients With Immunoglobulin A Nephropathy.
Idiopathic immunoglobulin A nephropathy (IgAN) is the most common biopsy-proven glomerulonephritis in the world. Approximately 40% of IgAN patients reach end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) 20 years after their kidney biopsy. The high prevalence of ESKD suggests the need to move from a generalized therapy for all patients to personalized therapy.
Many RCTs have been conducted stratifying patients based on the laboratory findings (serum creatinine, eGFR and daily proteinuria). In contrast, data from the kidney biopsy has been used only for clinical diagnosis. Therefore, IgAN patients with active or chronic renal lesions have not been equally distributed in experimental and control arms of the randomized clinical trials (RCTs) Our clinical study of IgAN (CLIgAN) is a multicentre, prospective, controlled and open-label randomized clinical trial based on patients' stratification at the time of their kidney biopsy. The investigators will consider, first, the type of renal lesions followed by the serum creatinine values, eGFR and proteinuria. IgAN patients with active renal lesions (n=132) will be enrolled in the first RCT (ACIgAN) in which they will receive corticosteroids (pulse therapy) plus oral corticosteroids combined with RASB or RASB followed by oral corticosteroids. IgAN patients with chronic or moderate renal lesions at high or very high risk of chronic renal disease (n=294) will be enrolled in the second RCT (CHRONIgAN) in which they will receive the SGLT2 inhibitor combined with RASB compared with RASB combined with oral corticosteroids. Using this approach, the investigators hypothesize that patients could receive personalized therapy based on renal lesions to ensure that the right drug gets to the right patient at the right time.
Read more
Recently, we developed a Clinical Decision Support System (CDSS) tool using artificial intelligence (artificial neural networks) to identify IgAN patients at high risk of developing ESKD. The IgAN tool (DialCheck) was validated in a retrospective cohort of IgAN patients but not in a prospective clinical study. The investigators propose to measure the power of the DiaCheck tool in patients enrolled in both RCTs to determine whether personalized therapy can slow the decline of the renal function to delay the ESKD.
The CLIgAN study also includes a cutting-edge molecular study for precision therapy (PRECIgAN).
Read the detailed description
BACKGROUND AND RATIONALE. Idiopathic Immunoglobulin A nephropathy (IgAN) is the most common biopsy-proven glomerulonephritis in the world. It is more prevalent in Asia than in Europe and the US. Approximately 40% of IgAN patients reach end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) 20 years after their kidney biopsy. The high prevalence of ESKD shows that IgAN has a significant economic impact in the all countries because renal replacement therapy is costly. Moreover, the disease's onset in the second and third decades of life represents a social challenge because young adult patients are very active and highly productive in the workplace. This challenge is one more reason to move from a generalized therapy for all patients to a personalized therapy.
The first edition of the KDIGO guidelines, published in 2012, suggested different therapeutic approaches for IgAN patients based on the clinical setting. However, the KDIGO guidelines do not consider the presence of active (endocapillary and extracapillary lesions) and chronic (tubulointerstitial lesions) renal lesions at the time of the kidney biopsy for therapy decision. The investigators of the clinical study in IgAN patients (CLIgAN) will consider for the patient's stratification the type of renal lesions, preliminarily, and then the clinical parameters as estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and proteinuria because the categorization of proteinuria and eGFR is not enough for a complete diagnosis of the disease.
AIMS. Considering the critical role of kidney biopsy, in the CLIgAN study the investigators plan to evaluate (i) the effect of corticosteroids combined with RASBs in IgAN patients with active renal lesions (ACIgAN) versus RASBs for 3 months followed by oral corticosteroids to determine whether the renal lesions are reversed by immediate corticosteroid therapy; (ii) the effect of SGLT2i in patients with chronic or moderate renal lesions (CHRONIgAN) to determine whether a delay of the ESKD onset is achieved; (iii) after the prediction of ESKD through the IgAN CDSS tool (DialCheck), to determine whether personalized therapy delays the impairment of the renal function; (iv) finally, on a small cohort of active and chronic IgAN patients enrolled in the CLIgAN study, a cutting edge-molecular study will be conducted to evaluate the effect of precision therapy (PRECIgAN).
STUDY DESIGN. The investigators have designed a prospective, multicentre, open-label clinical study that includes two multicentre randomized controlled trials (RCTs) based on the kidney biopsy report.
In the first RCT, patients with active renal lesions (E1 and/or C1), daily proteinuria >0.5 g and GFR ≥ 30 ml/min/1.72 m2 will be enrolled. They will be randomized to receive corticosteroids combined with RASBs in the experimental arm or RASBs alone in the control arm. Aim of this trial is to demostrate the benefit of corticosteroids in patients with active renal lesions.
In the second RCT, patients with chronic renal lesions (T1,2) and patients with moderate renal lesions (M0,1; S0,1; T0; E0; C0) at high or very high CKD risk (proteinuria> 0.5 g/day and GFR ≥ 30ml/min/1.73 m2) will be enrolled. They will be randomized to receive SGLT2 inhibitor (SGLT2i) combined with RASBs (experimental arm) or RASBs combined with corticosteroids (control arm). Aim of this trial is demostrate the benefit of SGLT2i combined with RASBs.
In conclusion, we have designed two RCTs (i) to study personalized therapy in biopsy-proven IgAN patients and (II) to monitor the outcomes to look at whether personalized therapy may delay the time to reach the ESKD predicted by our IgAN tool.
RECRUITMENT AND FOLLOW-UP. Renal Units will be involved in the enrollment of IgAN patients during a period of three years. The follow-up study to measure the outcomes will consist of regular visits at the prescribed times and to collect clinical and laboratory data and information on drug adherence. At the end of the trial, each patient will receive a final visit in the outpatient section.
OTHER MEAUSURES. Age, body mass index, eradication of infectious foci, or concurrent antibiotic therapy to prevent infections or to avoid the transformation of a trivial infection into a severe complication will be considered. Covid-19 vaccination will be done in all patients who will receive corticosteroids therapy. In addition, home and life conditions and culture will be analyzed. Regular daily exercise to prevent obesity and cardiovascular disease will be prescribed.
Dietary counseling. Patients with CKD stage 1 and 2 will observe the Mediterranean diet combined with reduced intake of proteins (1.0 - 0.8 g/kg bw/day). A reduced intake of proteins (0.6 - 0.8 g/kg bw/day) will also be prescribed to patients with CKD stage 3. Salt intake will be limited to 1.5 g/day. Dietary compliance will be assessed by measuring daily urinary sodium and urea excretion. Physical activity will be observed for 30 min. every day, primarily in the morning.
Severe adverse events. Infections, impaired glucose tolerance, weight gain, hypoglycemia will be monitored during the follow-up.
VARIABLES OF THE DISEASE. Kidney biopsy will be scored according to the Oxford classification because it is a simple method for predicting renal outcomes and for differentiating active and chronic renal lesions. Therefore, the kidney biopsy will be the principal key-note, not only for diagnosis but also for personalized therapy, because active renal lesions will be treated with immediate corticosteroid therapy before lesions become chronic. In some RCTs IgAN patients received six months of RASBs treatment before their enrollment for corticosteroid therapy. In our opinion this approach is not correct because the acute renal lesions evolve in the chronic stage and are no-responsive to corticosteroid therapy. Therefore, the aim of the first RCT is early treatment of the active renal lesions because they are responsible for altered GFR and proteinuria.
The definition of remission or no response of the MESTC lesions to therapy in published studies is inconsistent. Therefore, high-quality clinical trials with a large sample size are necessary to define the response of histological renal lesions to corticosteroids in biopsy-proven IgAN. The kidney biopsy will be analyzed using digital histopathologic analysis coupled with machine-learning tools. At least eight glomeruli will be available for a correct diagnosis. Renal tissue sections will be stained with hematoxylin and eosin, periodic acid-Schiff and methenamine silver. The last edition of the Oxford classification (MESTC) will be used for scoring the renal lesions.
Three independent renal pathologists, blinded to the study results, will score the lesions in the kidney biopsy using the Aperio System. The histology report will be necessary for the enrollment of patients. No larger RCT has confirmed that the disease improves when clinical decisions are made in a short time in the presence of the MESTC score.
- Serum creatinine will be measured using enzymatic methods calibrated to the National Institute of Standards and Technology's (NIST) liquid chromatography isotope dilution mass spectrometry method. eGFR creatinine will be evaluated by the CKD-EPI formula. Moreover, the slope of eGFR (16) will be calculated. Patients, categorized in CKD stages 1 to 3, will be included in the clinical study.
- Proteinuria. Patients will collect 24 hour urine for proteinuria. Values of >0.5 g/ day will be considered abnormal. Proteinuria reduction (geometric mean of 30% within 6 months), time-average proteinuria (TA-P) and slope of proteinuria will be evaluated.
Serum creatinine, proteinuria, age and hypertension have a lower weight when histological lesions are not considered. This finding highlights the importance of the kidney biopsy, not only for diagnosis but for personalized treatment.
- Blood hypertension is defined when values are > 130/80 mmHg or in subjects treated with anti-hypertensive drugs.
- For hyperuricemia allopurinol therapy is recommended.
SAMPLE SIZE CALCULATION.
ACIgAN. Data from the literature show a difference in renal survival between corticosteroids and controls when the researchers assumed a difference of 50% in the primary end point (i.e. in the between-arms difference of delta 24 hour proteinuria from baseline to 6 months) as clinically relevant. We assume that a mean delta proteinuria (±SD) from baseline to 6 months in patients treated with Ramipril alone (control arm) is 0.6±1.0 g/24 hours versus a mean delta proteinuria (±SD) from baseline to 6 months in patients treated with Ramipril and corticosteroids (experimental arm) 1.2±1.0 g/24 hours. Based on these assumptions, we calculated a sample size of 132 patients (66 patients per group including a 10% dropout rate) for a power of 90%, a two-sided significance level of 0.05 and 3 years of recruitment. If the number of the enrolled patients will be insufficient, the recruitment period will be extended for two years. At 4 months, all patients of the control arm who will display a 24 hour proteinuria >0.5g will be switched to the experimental treatment and will receive corticosteroids combined with RASBs for 4 months. They will be followed-up until the study termination.
CHRONIgAN. Data from the literature suggest a difference of renal survival between SGLT2is and controls. Here we assume a difference of 40% in the primary end point (i.e. in the between-arms difference of delta 24 hour proteinuria from baseline to 6 months) as clinically relevant. We assume that a mean delta proteinuria (±SD) from baseline to 6 months in patients with Ramipril alone is 0.6±1.0 g/24 hours versus a mean delta proteinuria (±SD) from baseline to 6 months in patients treated with SGLT-2 inhibitor and Ramipril (1.0±1.0 g/24 hours). Based on these assumptions, we have calculated a sample size of 294 patients (147 patients per group including a 10% dropout rate) for a power of 90%, a two-sided significance level of 0.05 and 3 years of recruitment. If the time-recruitment will be insufficient, the recruitment period will be extended for two years. At 6 months, all patients of the control arm who will display a 24 hour proteinuria >0.5 g will be switched to the experimental treatment (SGLT-2 inhibitor combined with Ramipril). They will be followed-up until the study termination.
- Conditions
- Glomerulonephritis, Immunoglobulin A Nephropathy
- Being tested
- Corticosteroid, Renin-angiotensin sytem blockers, Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor
- Keywords
- IgA nephropathy, Steroids, RAS-blockers, SGLT2-inhibitors
- Medical subject headings
- Glomerulonephritis, Glomerulonephritis, IGA
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
CorticosteroidDrug
Also called Methylprednisolone succinate, prednisolone
To reduce the progression of renal damage in IgAN Patients
Renin-angiotensin sytem blockersDrug
Also called Ramipril, lisinopril, losartan
To reduce the progression of renal damage in IgAN Patients
Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitorDrug
Also called dapagliflozin, canagliflozin, empagliflozin
To reduce the progression of renal damage in IgAN Patients
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Corticosteroids combined with RASBs | Experimental | Patients assigned to the corticosteroid group will receive (pulse) methylprednisolone succinate 500-1000 mg/day for 3 consecutive days followed by oral prednisolone (0.5 mg/kg/bw) on alternate days until the end of month. This treatment will be repeated for three consecutive months. In addition, patients will receive RASBs that will be titrated to their maximum anti-proteinuric effect. The dose of methylprednisolone succinate will be individualized (15 mg/kg) based on the ideal body weight. In overweight and obese IgAN patients the ideal body weight will be considered. The drug will be administered in a single daily dose intravenously for 30-60 min. To avoid obesity and diabetes corticosteroids will be administered only in the morning. Receives: Drug: Corticosteroid; Drug: Renin-angiotensin sytem blockers |
| RASBs | Active comparator | Patients will receive RASBs for 3 months, titrated to their maximum anti-proteinuric effectf followed by oral corticosteroids. Receives: Drug: Renin-angiotensin sytem blockers |
| SGLT2i combined with Ramipril | Experimental | IgAN patients with chronic renal lesions (T1,2) or moderate renal lesions (M0,1; S0,1; T0; E0; C0) at high or very high CKD risk (proteinuria> 0.5 g/day and GFR >30ml/min/1.73 m2) will receive SGLT2i combined with RASBs. Receives: Drug: Renin-angiotensin sytem blockers; Drug: Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor |
| Ramipril combined with corticosteroids | Active comparator | IgAN patients with chronic renal lesions (T1,2) or moderate renal lesions (M0,1; S0,1; T0; E0; C0) at high or very high CKD risk (proteinuria> 0.5 g/day and GFR >30ml/min/1.73 m2) will receive RASBs for 3 months followed by oral corticosteroids. Receives: Drug: Corticosteroid; Drug: Renin-angiotensin sytem blockers |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
-Proteinuria reduction within 6 months in IgAN patients with active renal lesions
Reduction of proteinuria will be calculated as difference betweeen arms within 6 months
Measured: 6th month
Proteinuria reduction within 6 months in IgAN patients with active renal lesions
Reduction of proteinuria will be calculated as difference betweeen arms within every 6 months
Measured: 12th month
Proteinuria reduction within 6 months in IgAN patients with active renal lesions
Reduction of proteinuria will be calculated as difference betweeen arms within every 6 months
Measured: 18th month
Proteinuria reduction within 6 months in IgAN patients with active renal lesions
Reduction of proteinuria will be calculated as difference betweeen arms within every 6 months
Measured: 24th month
Proteinuria reduction within 6 months in IgAN patients with active renal lesions
Reduction of proteinuria will be calculated as difference betweeen arms within every 6 months
Measured: 30th month
Proteinuria reduction within 6 months in IgAN patients with active renal lesions
Reduction of proteinuria will be calculated as difference betweeen arms within every 6 months
Measured: 36th month
Proteinuria reduction within 6 months in IgAN patients with chronic renal lesions
Reduction of proteinuria will be calculated as difference betweeen arms within every 6 months
Measured: 6th month
Proteinuria reduction within 6 months in IgAN patients with chronic renal lesions
Reduction of proteinuria will be calculated as difference betweeen arms within every 6 months
Measured: 12th month
Proteinuria reduction within 6 months in IgAN with chronic renal lesions
Reduction of proteinuria will be calculated as difference betweeen arms within every 6 months
Measured: 18th month
Proteinuria reduction within 6 months in IgAN patients with chronic renal lesions
Reduction of proteinuria will be calculated as difference betweeen arms within every 6 months
Measured: 24th month
Proteinuria reduction within 6 months in IgAN with chronic renal lesions
Reduction of proteinuria will be calculated as difference betweeen arms within every 6 months
Measured: 30th month
Proteinuria reduction within 6 months in IgAN with chronic renal lesions
Reduction of proteinuria will be calculated as difference betweeen arms within every 6 months
Measured: 36th month
Secondary outcomes (56)
eGFR slope change in IgAN patients with active renal lesions
eGFR slope change calculated as the mean of the individual slopes obtained from individual linear regression of eGFR over time;
Measured: 6th month
eGFR slope change in IgAN patients with active renal lesions
eGFR slope change calculated as the mean of the individual slopes obtained from individual linear regression of eGFR over time;
Measured: 12th month
eGFR slope change in IgAN patients with active renal lesions
eGFR slope change calculated as the mean of the individual slopes obtained from individual linear regression of eGFR over time;
Measured: 18th month
eGFR slope change in IgAN patients with active renal lesions
eGFR slope change calculated as the mean of the individual slopes obtained from individual linear regression of eGFR over time;
Measured: 24th month
eGFR slope change in IgAN patients with active renal lesions
eGFR slope change calculated as the mean of the individual slopes obtained from individual linear regression of eGFR over time;
Measured: 30th month
eGFR slope change in IgAN patients with active renal lesions
eGFR slope change calculated as the mean of the individual slopes obtained from individual linear regression of eGFR over time;
Measured: 36th month
eGFR slope change in IgAN patients with chronic renal lesions
eGFR slope change calculated as the mean of the individual slopes obtained from individual linear regression of eGFR over time;
Measured: 6th month
eGFR slope change in IgAN patients with chronic renal lesions
eGFR slope change calculated as the mean of the individual slopes obtained from individual linear regression of eGFR over time;
Measured: 12th month
eGFR slope change in IgAN patients with chronic renal lesions
eGFR slope change calculated as the mean of the individual slopes obtained from individual linear regression of eGFR over time;
Measured: 18th month
eGFR slope change in IgAN patients with chronic renal lesions
eGFR slope change calculated as the mean of the individual slopes obtained from individual linear regression of eGFR over time;
Measured: 24th month
eGFR slope change in IgAN patients with chronic renal lesions
eGFR slope change calculated as the mean of the individual slopes obtained from individual linear regression of eGFR over time;
Measured: 30th month
eGFR slope change in IgAN patients with chronic renal lesions
eGFR slope change calculated as the mean of the individual slopes obtained from individual linear regression of eGFR over time;
Measured: 36th month
eGFR decline >40% in IgAN patients with active renal lesions
eGFR decline >40% in IgAN patients with active renal lesions
Measured: 6th month
eGFR decline >40% in IgAN patients with active renal lesions
eGFR decline >40% in IgAN patients with active renal lesions
Measured: 12th month
eGFR decline >40% in IgAN patients with active renal lesions
eGFR decline >40% in IgAN patients with active renal lesions
Measured: 18th month
eGFR decline >40% in IgAN patients with active renal lesions
eGFR decline >40% in IgAN patients with active renal lesions
Measured: 24th month
eGFR decline >40% in IgAN patients with active renal lesions
eGFR decline >40% in IgAN patients with active renal lesions
Measured: 30th month
eGFR decline >40% in IgAN patients with active renal lesions
eGFR decline >40% in IgAN patients with active renal lesions
Measured: 36th month
eGFR decline >40% in IgAN patients with chronic renal lesions
eGFR decline >40% in IgAN patients with chronic renal lesions
Measured: 6th month
eGFR decline >40% in IgAN patients with chronic renal lesions
eGFR decline >40% in IgAN patients with chronic renal lesions
Measured: 12th month
eGFR decline >40% in IgAN patients with chronic renal lesions
eGFR decline >40% in IgAN patients with chronic renal lesions
Measured: 18th month
eGFR decline >40% in IgAN patients with chronic renal lesions
eGFR decline >40% in IgAN patients with chronic renal lesions
Measured: 24th month
eGFR decline >40% in IgAN patients with chronic renal lesions
eGFR decline >40% in IgAN patients with chronic renal lesions
Measured: 30th month
eGFR decline >40% in IgAN patients with chronic renal lesions
eGFR decline >40% in IgAN patients with chronic renal lesions
Measured: 36th month
composite endpoint: eGFR decline > 40%, ESKD (defined as long-term eGFR < 15 ml/min/1.73m2 for more than 3 months or need of maintenance dialysis or kidney transplantation) and death due to kidney disease in IgAN patients with active renal lesions
composite endpoint: eGFR decline > 40%, ESKD (defined as long-term eGFR < 15 ml/min/1.73m2 for more than 3 months or need of maintenance dialysis or kidney transplantation) and death due to kidney disease in IgAN patients with active renal lesions
Measured: 6th month
composite endpoint: eGFR decline > 40%, ESKD (defined as long-term eGFR < 15 ml/min/1.73m2 for more than 3 months or need of maintenance dialysis or kidney transplantation) and death due to kidney disease in IgAN patients with active renal lesions
composite endpoint: eGFR decline > 40%, ESKD (defined as long-term eGFR < 15 ml/min/1.73m2 for more than 3 months or need of maintenance dialysis or kidney transplantation) and death due to kidney disease in IgAN patients with active renal lesions
Measured: 12th month
composite endpoint: eGFR decline > 40%, ESKD (defined as long-term eGFR < 15 ml/min/1.73m2 for more than 3 months or need of maintenance dialysis or kidney transplantation) and death due to kidney disease in IgAN patients with active renal lesions
composite endpoint: eGFR decline > 40%, ESKD (defined as long-term eGFR < 15 ml/min/1.73m2 for more than 3 months or need of maintenance dialysis or kidney transplantation) and death due to kidney disease in IgAN patients with active renal lesions
Measured: 18th month
composite endpoint: eGFR decline > 40%, ESKD and death due to kidney disease in IgAN patients with active renal lesions
composite endpoint: eGFR decline > 40%, ESKD (defined as long-term eGFR < 15 ml/min/1.73m2 for more than 3 months or need of maintenance dialysis or kidney transplantation) and death due to kidney disease in IgAN patients with active renal lesions
Measured: 24th month
composite endpoint: eGFR decline > 40%, ESKD and death due to kidney disease in IgAN patients with active renal lesions
composite endpoint: eGFR decline > 40%, ESKD (defined as long-term eGFR < 15 ml/min/1.73m2 for more than 3 months or need of maintenance dialysis or kidney transplantation) and death due to kidney disease in IgAN patients with active renal lesions
Measured: 30th month
composite endpoint: eGFR decline > 40%, ESKD and death due to kidney disease in IgAN patients with active renal lesions
composite endpoint: eGFR decline > 40%, ESKD (defined as long-term eGFR < 15 ml/min/1.73m2 for more than 3 months or need of maintenance dialysis or kidney transplantation) and death due to kidney disease in IgAN patients with active renal lesions
Measured: 36th month
composite endpoint: eGFR decline > 40%, ESKD and death due to kidney disease in IgAN patients with chronic renal lesions
composite endpoint: eGFR decline > 40%, ESKD (defined as long-term eGFR < 15 ml/min/1.73m2 for more than 3 months or need of maintenance dialysis or kidney transplantation) and death due to kidney disease in IgAN patients with chronic rena lesions
Measured: 6th month
composite endpoint: eGFR decline > 40%, ESKD and death due to kidney disease in IgAN patients with chronic renal lesions
composite endpoint: eGFR decline > 40%, ESKD (defined as long-term eGFR < 15 ml/min/1.73m2 for more than 3 months or need of maintenance dialysis or kidney transplantation) and death due to kidney disease in IgAN patients with chronic rena lesions
Measured: 12th month
composite endpoint: eGFR decline > 40%, ESKD and death due to kidney disease. in IgAN patients with chronic renal lesions
composite endpoint: eGFR decline > 40%, ESKD (defined as long-term eGFR < 15 ml/min/1.73m2 for more than 3 months or need of maintenance dialysis or kidney transplantation) and death due to kidney disease in IgAN patients with chronic renal lesions
Measured: 18th month
composite endpoint: eGFR decline > 40%, ESKD and death due to kidney disease. in IgAN patients with chronic renal lesions
composite endpoint: eGFR decline > 40%, ESKD (defined as long-term eGFR < 15 ml/min/1.73m2 for more than 3 months or need of maintenance dialysis or kidney transplantation) and death due to kidney disease in IgAN patients with chronic renal lesions
Measured: 24th month
composite endpoint: eGFR decline > 40%, ESKD and death due to kidney disease. in IgAN patients with chronic renal lesions
composite endpoint: eGFR decline > 40%, ESKD (defined as long-term eGFR < 15 ml/min/1.73m2 for more than 3 months or need of maintenance dialysis or kidney transplantation) and death due to kidney disease in IgAN patients with chronic renal lesions
Measured: 30th month
composite endpoint: eGFR decline > 40%, ESKD and death due to kidney disease. in IgAN patients with chronic renal lesions
composite endpoint: eGFR decline > 40%, ESKD (defined as long-term eGFR < 15 ml/min/1.73m2 for more than 3 months or need of maintenance dialysis or kidney transplantation) and death due to kidney disease in IgAN patients with chronic renal lesions
Measured: 36th month
proteinuria reduction (geometric mean of 30% within 6 months)
proteinuria reduction in IgAN patients with chronic renal lesions
Measured: 6th month
proteinuria reduction (geometric mean of 30% within 6 months)
proteinuria reduction in IgAN patients with chronic renal lesions
Measured: 12th month
proteinuria reduction (geometric mean of 30% within 6 months)
proteinuria reduction in IgAN patients with chronic renal lesions
Measured: 18th month
proteinuria reduction (geometric mean of 30% within 6 months)
proteinuria reduction in IgAN patients with chronic renal lesions
Measured: 24th month
proteinuria reduction (geometric mean of 30% within 6 months)
proteinuria reduction in IgAN patients with chronic renal lesions
Measured: 30th month
proteinuria reduction (geometric mean of 30% within 6 months)
proteinuria reduction in IgAN patients with chronic renal lesions
Measured: 36th month
time-averaged proteinuria (TA-P) calculated as the weighted mean of all post-randomization measurement, with weights representing the time elapsed since the previous measurement in IgAN patients with active renal lesions
time-averaged proteinuria (TA-P) calculated as the weighted mean of all post-randomization measurement, with weights representing the time elapsed since the previous measurement
Measured: 3rd month
time-averaged proteinuria (TA-P) calculated as the weighted mean of all post-randomization measurement, with weights representing the time elapsed since the previous measurement in IgAN patients with active renal lesions
time-averaged proteinuria (TA-P) calculated as the weighted mean of all post-randomization measurement, with weights representing the time elapsed since the previous measurement
Measured: 6th month
time-averaged proteinuria (TA-P) calculated as the weighted mean of all post-randomization measurement, with weights representing the time elapsed since the previous measurement in IgAN patients with active renal lesions
time-averaged proteinuria (TA-P) calculated as the weighted mean of all post-randomization measurement, with weights representing the time elapsed since the previous measurement
Measured: 9th month
time-averaged proteinuria (TA-P) calculated as the weighted mean of all post-randomization measurement, with weights representing the time elapsed since the previous measurement in IgAN patients with active renal lesions
time-averaged proteinuria (TA-P) calculated as the weighted mean of all post-randomization measurement, with weights representing the time elapsed since the previous measurement
Measured: 12th month
time-averaged proteinuria (TA-P) calculated as the weighted mean of all post-randomization measurement, with weights representing the time elapsed since the previous measurement in IgAN patients with active renal lesions
time-averaged proteinuria (TA-P) calculated as the weighted mean of all post-randomization measurement, with weights representing the time elapsed since the previous measurement
Measured: 18th month
time-averaged proteinuria (TA-P) calculated as the weighted mean of all post-randomization measurement, with weights representing the time elapsed since the previous measurement in IgAN patients with active renal lesions
time-averaged proteinuria (TA-P) calculated as the weighted mean of all post-randomization measurement, with weights representing the time elapsed since the previous measurement
Measured: 24th month
time-averaged proteinuria (TA-P) calculated as the weighted mean of all post-randomization measurement, with weights representing the time elapsed since the previous measurement in IgAN patients with active renal lesions
time-averaged proteinuria (TA-P) calculated as the weighted mean of all post-randomization measurement, with weights representing the time elapsed since the previous measurement
Measured: 30th month
time-averaged proteinuria (TA-P) calculated as the weighted mean of all post-randomization measurement, with weights representing the time elapsed since the previous measurement in IgAN patients with active renal lesions
time-averaged proteinuria (TA-P) calculated as the weighted mean of all post-randomization measurement, with weights representing the time elapsed since the previous measurement
Measured: 36th month
time-averaged proteinuria (TA-P) calculated as the weighted mean of all post-randomization measurement, with weights representing the time elapsed since the previous measurement in IgAN patients with chronic renal lesions
time-averaged proteinuria (TA-P) calculated as the weighted mean of all post-randomization measurement, with weights representing the time elapsed since the previous measurement
Measured: 6th month
time-averaged proteinuria (TA-P) calculated as the weighted mean of all post-randomization measurement, with weights representing the time elapsed since the previous measurement in IgAN patients with chronic renal lesions
time-averaged proteinuria (TA-P) calculated as the weighted mean of all post-randomization measurement, with weights representing the time elapsed since the previous measurement
Measured: 12th month
time-averaged proteinuria (TA-P) calculated as the weighted mean of all post-randomization measurement, with weights representing the time elapsed since the previous measurement in IgAN patients with chronic renal lesions
time-averaged proteinuria (TA-P) calculated as the weighted mean of all post-randomization measurement, with weights representing the time elapsed since the previous measurement
Measured: 18th month
time-averaged proteinuria (TA-P) calculated as the weighted mean of all post-randomization measurement, with weights representing the time elapsed since the previous measurement in IgAN patients with chronic renal lesions
time-averaged proteinuria (TA-P) calculated as the weighted mean of all post-randomization measurement, with weights representing the time elapsed since the previous measurement
Measured: 24th month
time-averaged proteinuria (TA-P) calculated as the weighted mean of all post-randomization measurement, with weights representing the time elapsed since the previous measurement in IgAN patients with chronic renal lesions
time-averaged proteinuria (TA-P) calculated as the weighted mean of all post-randomization measurement, with weights representing the time elapsed since the previous measurement
Measured: 30th month
time-averaged proteinuria (TA-P) calculated as the weighted mean of all post-randomization measurement, with weights representing the time elapsed since the previous measurement in IgAN patients with chronic renal lesions
time-averaged proteinuria (TA-P) calculated as the weighted mean of all post-randomization measurement, with weights representing the time elapsed since the previous measurement
Measured: 36 th month
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted10 Dec 2020
- Study start1 May 2023
- Primary completion1 Jun 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion31 Dec 2028 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (23)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for GlomerulonephritisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- After the enrolment the eligible biopsy-proven IgAN patients will be randomized, separately, in each trial in a 1 to 1 ratio via a web-based program generating random numbers. The allocation will be not blinded to the group of assignment.
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 878 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Fondazione Schena
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University of Bari
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Francesco Paolo Schena, Fondazione Schena
- Investigators
- Francesco P Schena, Study chair, Fondazione Schenafrancesco P Schena, Study director, Fondazione Schena
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04662723
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2
- Acronym
- CLIgAN
- Status last verified
- Mar 2025
- First submitted
- 27 Nov 2020
- Last updated
- 2 Apr 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: IPD will be shared with other partners
Publications
Schena FP, Nistor I. Epidemiology of IgA Nephropathy: A Global Perspective. Semin Nephrol. 2018 Sep;38(5):435-442. doi: 10.1016/j.semnephrol.2018.05.013.
PubMed 30177015Koyama A, Igarashi M, Kobayashi M. Natural history and risk factors for immunoglobulin A nephropathy in Japan. Research Group on Progressive Renal Diseases. Am J Kidney Dis. 1997 Apr;29(4):526-32. doi: 10.1016/s0272-6386(97)90333-4.
PubMed 9100040Manno C, Strippoli GF, D'Altri C, Torres D, Rossini M, Schena FP. A novel simpler histological classification for renal survival in IgA nephropathy: a retrospective study. Am J Kidney Dis. 2007 Jun;49(6):763-75. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2007.03.013.
PubMed 17533019Chapter 10: Immunoglobulin A nephropathy. Kidney Int Suppl (2011). 2012 Jun;2(2):209-217. doi: 10.1038/kisup.2012.23. No abstract available.
PubMed 25018935Schena FP, Anelli VW, Trotta J, Di Noia T, Manno C, Tripepi G, D'Arrigo G, Chesnaye NC, Russo ML, Stangou M, Papagianni A, Zoccali C, Tesar V, Coppo R; members of the VALIGA study. Development and testing of an artificial intelligence tool for predicting end-stage kidney disease in patients with immunoglobulin A nephropathy. Kidney Int. 2021 May;99(5):1179-1188. doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2020.07.046. Epub 2020 Sep 2.
PubMed 32889014Working Group of the International IgA Nephropathy Network and the Renal Pathology Society; Roberts IS, Cook HT, Troyanov S, Alpers CE, Amore A, Barratt J, Berthoux F, Bonsib S, Bruijn JA, Cattran DC, Coppo R, D'Agati V, D'Amico G, Emancipator S, Emma F, Feehally J, Ferrario F, Fervenza FC, Florquin S, Fogo A, Geddes CC, Groene HJ, Haas M, Herzenberg AM, Hill PA, Hogg RJ, Hsu SI, Jennette JC, Joh K, Julian BA, Kawamura T, Lai FM, Li LS, Li PK, Liu ZH, Mackinnon B, Mezzano S, Schena FP, Tomino Y, Walker PD, Wang H, Weening JJ, Yoshikawa N, Zhang H. The Oxford classification of IgA nephropathy: pathology definitions, correlations, and reproducibility. Kidney Int. 2009 Sep;76(5):546-56. doi: 10.1038/ki.2009.168. Epub 2009 Jul 1.
PubMed 19571790Working Group of the International IgA Nephropathy Network and the Renal Pathology Society; Cattran DC, Coppo R, Cook HT, Feehally J, Roberts IS, Troyanov S, Alpers CE, Amore A, Barratt J, Berthoux F, Bonsib S, Bruijn JA, D'Agati V, D'Amico G, Emancipator S, Emma F, Ferrario F, Fervenza FC, Florquin S, Fogo A, Geddes CC, Groene HJ, Haas M, Herzenberg AM, Hill PA, Hogg RJ, Hsu SI, Jennette JC, Joh K, Julian BA, Kawamura T, Lai FM, Leung CB, Li LS, Li PK, Liu ZH, Mackinnon B, Mezzano S, Schena FP, Tomino Y, Walker PD, Wang H, Weening JJ, Yoshikawa N, Zhang H. The Oxford classification of IgA nephropathy: rationale, clinicopathological correlations, and classification. Kidney Int. 2009 Sep;76(5):534-45. doi: 10.1038/ki.2009.243. Epub 2009 Jul 1.
PubMed 19571791Kang SH, Choi SR, Park HS, Lee JY, Sun IO, Hwang HS, Chung BH, Park CW, Yang CW, Kim YS, Choi YJ, Choi BS. The Oxford classification as a predictor of prognosis in patients with IgA nephropathy. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2012 Jan;27(1):252-8. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfr295. Epub 2011 May 23.
PubMed 21606384Rauen T, Eitner F, Fitzner C, Sommerer C, Zeier M, Otte B, Panzer U, Peters H, Benck U, Mertens PR, Kuhlmann U, Witzke O, Gross O, Vielhauer V, Mann JF, Hilgers RD, Floege J; STOP-IgAN Investigators. Intensive Supportive Care plus Immunosuppression in IgA Nephropathy. N Engl J Med. 2015 Dec 3;373(23):2225-36. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1415463.
PubMed 26630142Lv J, Zhang H, Wong MG, Jardine MJ, Hladunewich M, Jha V, Monaghan H, Zhao M, Barbour S, Reich H, Cattran D, Glassock R, Levin A, Wheeler D, Woodward M, Billot L, Chan TM, Liu ZH, Johnson DW, Cass A, Feehally J, Floege J, Remuzzi G, Wu Y, Agarwal R, Wang HY, Perkovic V; TESTING Study Group. Effect of Oral Methylprednisolone on Clinical Outcomes in Patients With IgA Nephropathy: The TESTING Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2017 Aug 1;318(5):432-442. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.9362.
PubMed 28763548Shen XH, Liang SS, Chen HM, Le WB, Jiang S, Zeng CH, Zhou ML, Zhang HT, Liu ZH. Reversal of active glomerular lesions after immunosuppressive therapy in patients with IgA nephropathy: a repeat-biopsy based observation. J Nephrol. 2015 Aug;28(4):441-9. doi: 10.1007/s40620-014-0165-x. Epub 2015 Jan 14.
PubMed 25585823Shi SF, Wang SX, Jiang L, Lv JC, Liu LJ, Chen YQ, Zhu SN, Liu G, Zou WZ, Zhang H, Wang HY. Pathologic predictors of renal outcome and therapeutic efficacy in IgA nephropathy: validation of the oxford classification. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2011 Sep;6(9):2175-84. doi: 10.2215/CJN.11521210. Epub 2011 Aug 18.
PubMed 21852672Lv J, Yang Y, Zhang H, Chen W, Pan X, Guo Z, Wang C, Li S, Zhang J, Zhang J, Liu L, Shi S, Wang S, Chen M, Cui Z, Chen N, Yu X, Zhao M, Wang H. Prediction of outcomes in crescentic IgA nephropathy in a multicenter cohort study. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2013 Dec;24(12):2118-25. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2012101017. Epub 2013 Sep 12.
PubMed 24029421Trimarchi H, Barratt J, Cattran DC, Cook HT, Coppo R, Haas M, Liu ZH, Roberts IS, Yuzawa Y, Zhang H, Feehally J; IgAN Classification Working Group of the International IgA Nephropathy Network and the Renal Pathology Society; Conference Participants. Oxford Classification of IgA nephropathy 2016: an update from the IgA Nephropathy Classification Working Group. Kidney Int. 2017 May;91(5):1014-1021. doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2017.02.003. Epub 2017 Mar 22.
PubMed 28341274Levey AS, Eckardt KU, Dorman NM, Christiansen SL, Hoorn EJ, Ingelfinger JR, Inker LA, Levin A, Mehrotra R, Palevsky PM, Perazella MA, Tong A, Allison SJ, Bockenhauer D, Briggs JP, Bromberg JS, Davenport A, Feldman HI, Fouque D, Gansevoort RT, Gill JS, Greene EL, Hemmelgarn BR, Kretzler M, Lambie M, Lane PH, Laycock J, Leventhal SE, Mittelman M, Morrissey P, Ostermann M, Rees L, Ronco P, Schaefer F, St Clair Russell J, Vinck C, Walsh SB, Weiner DE, Cheung M, Jadoul M, Winkelmayer WC. Nomenclature for kidney function and disease: report of a Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Consensus Conference. Kidney Int. 2020 Jun;97(6):1117-1129. doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2020.02.010. Epub 2020 Mar 9.
PubMed 32409237
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 2 Apr 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Multicentre Prospective Open Label Clinical Study to Evaluate the Effect of Personalized Therapy on Patients With Immunoglobulin A Nephropathy.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04662723
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CLIgAN / 2
- Conditions
- Glomerulonephritis, Immunoglobulin A Nephropathy
- Keywords
- IgA nephropathy, Steroids, RAS-blockers, SGLT2-inhibitors
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 878 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Fondazione SchenaUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University of Bari
- Study start
- 1 May 2023 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Jun 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 31 Dec 2028 (estimated)
- First posted
- 10 Dec 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Idiopathic immunoglobulin A nephropathy (IgAN) is the most common biopsy-proven glomerulonephritis in the world. Approximately 40% of IgAN patients reach end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) 20 years after their kidney biopsy. The high prevalence of ESKD suggests the need to move from a generalized therapy for all patients to personalized therapy.
Many RCTs have been conducted stratifying patients based on the laboratory findings (serum creatinine, eGFR and daily proteinuria). In contrast, data from the kidney biopsy has been used only for clinical diagnosis. Therefore, IgAN patients with active or chronic renal lesions have not been equally distributed in experimental and control arms of the randomized clinical trials (RCTs) Our clinical study of IgAN (CLIgAN) is a multicentre, prospective, controlled and open-label randomized clinical trial based on patients' stratification at the time of their kidney biopsy. The investigators will consider, first, the type of renal lesions followed by the serum creatinine values, eGFR and proteinuria. IgAN patients with active renal lesions (n=132) will be enrolled in the first RCT (ACIgAN) in which they will receive corticosteroids (pulse therapy) plus oral corticosteroids combined with RASB or RASB followed by oral corticosteroids. IgAN patients with chronic or moderate renal lesions at high or very high risk of chronic renal disease (n=294) will be enrolled in the second RCT (CHRONIgAN) in which they will receive the SGLT2 inhibitor combined with RASB compared with RASB combined with oral corticosteroids. Using this approach, the investigators hypothesize that patients could receive personalized therapy based on renal lesions to ensure that the right drug gets to the right patient at the right time.
Recently, we developed a Clinical Decision Support System (CDSS) tool using artificial intelligence (artificial neural networks) to identify IgAN patients at high risk of developing ESKD. The IgAN tool (DialCheck) was validated in a retrospective cohort of IgAN patients but not in a prospective clinical study. The investigators propose to measure the power of the DiaCheck tool in patients enrolled in both RCTs to determine whether personalized therapy can slow the decline of the renal function to delay the ESKD.
The CLIgAN study also includes a cutting-edge molecular study for precision therapy (PRECIgAN).
Detailed description
BACKGROUND AND RATIONALE. Idiopathic Immunoglobulin A nephropathy (IgAN) is the most common biopsy-proven glomerulonephritis in the world. It is more prevalent in Asia than in Europe and the US. Approximately 40% of IgAN patients reach end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) 20 years after their kidney biopsy. The high prevalence of ESKD shows that IgAN has a significant economic impact in the all countries because renal replacement therapy is costly. Moreover, the disease's onset in the second and third decades of life represents a social challenge because young adult patients are very active and highly productive in the workplace. This challenge is one more reason to move from a generalized therapy for all patients to a personalized therapy.
The first edition of the KDIGO guidelines, published in 2012, suggested different therapeutic approaches for IgAN patients based on the clinical setting. However, the KDIGO guidelines do not consider the presence of active (endocapillary and extracapillary lesions) and chronic (tubulointerstitial lesions) renal lesions at the time of the kidney biopsy for therapy decision. The investigators of the clinical study in IgAN patients (CLIgAN) will consider for the patient's stratification the type of renal lesions, preliminarily, and then the clinical parameters as estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and proteinuria because the categorization of proteinuria and eGFR is not enough for a complete diagnosis of the disease.
AIMS. Considering the critical role of kidney biopsy, in the CLIgAN study the investigators plan to evaluate (i) the effect of corticosteroids combined with RASBs in IgAN patients with active renal lesions (ACIgAN) versus RASBs for 3 months followed by oral corticosteroids to determine whether the renal lesions are reversed by immediate corticosteroid therapy; (ii) the effect of SGLT2i in patients with chronic or moderate renal lesions (CHRONIgAN) to determine whether a delay of the ESKD onset is achieved; (iii) after the prediction of ESKD through the IgAN CDSS tool (DialCheck), to determine whether personalized therapy delays the impairment of the renal function; (iv) finally, on a small cohort of active and chronic IgAN patients enrolled in the CLIgAN study, a cutting edge-molecular study will be conducted to evaluate the effect of precision therapy (PRECIgAN).
STUDY DESIGN. The investigators have designed a prospective, multicentre, open-label clinical study that includes two multicentre randomized controlled trials (RCTs) based on the kidney biopsy report.
In the first RCT, patients with active renal lesions (E1 and/or C1), daily proteinuria >0.5 g and GFR ≥ 30 ml/min/1.72 m2 will be enrolled. They will be randomized to receive corticosteroids combined with RASBs in the experimental arm or RASBs alone in the control arm. Aim of this trial is to demostrate the benefit of corticosteroids in patients with active renal lesions.
In the second RCT, patients with chronic renal lesions (T1,2) and patients with moderate renal lesions (M0,1; S0,1; T0; E0; C0) at high or very high CKD risk (proteinuria> 0.5 g/day and GFR ≥ 30ml/min/1.73 m2) will be enrolled. They will be randomized to receive SGLT2 inhibitor (SGLT2i) combined with RASBs (experimental arm) or RASBs combined with corticosteroids (control arm). Aim of this trial is demostrate the benefit of SGLT2i combined with RASBs.
In conclusion, we have designed two RCTs (i) to study personalized therapy in biopsy-proven IgAN patients and (II) to monitor the outcomes to look at whether personalized therapy may delay the time to reach the ESKD predicted by our IgAN tool.
RECRUITMENT AND FOLLOW-UP. Renal Units will be involved in the enrollment of IgAN patients during a period of three years. The follow-up study to measure the outcomes will consist of regular visits at the prescribed times and to collect clinical and laboratory data and information on drug adherence. At the end of the trial, each patient will receive a final visit in the outpatient section.
OTHER MEAUSURES. Age, body mass index, eradication of infectious foci, or concurrent antibiotic therapy to prevent infections or to avoid the transformation of a trivial infection into a severe complication will be considered. Covid-19 vaccination will be done in all patients who will receive corticosteroids therapy. In addition, home and life conditions and culture will be analyzed. Regular daily exercise to prevent obesity and cardiovascular disease will be prescribed.
Dietary counseling. Patients with CKD stage 1 and 2 will observe the Mediterranean diet combined with reduced intake of proteins (1.0 - 0.8 g/kg bw/day). A reduced intake of proteins (0.6 - 0.8 g/kg bw/day) will also be prescribed to patients with CKD stage 3. Salt intake will be limited to 1.5 g/day. Dietary compliance will be assessed by measuring daily urinary sodium and urea excretion. Physical activity will be observed for 30 min. every day, primarily in the morning.
Severe adverse events. Infections, impaired glucose tolerance, weight gain, hypoglycemia will be monitored during the follow-up.
VARIABLES OF THE DISEASE. Kidney biopsy will be scored according to the Oxford classification because it is a simple method for predicting renal outcomes and for differentiating active and chronic renal lesions. Therefore, the kidney biopsy will be the principal key-note, not only for diagnosis but also for personalized therapy, because active renal lesions will be treated with immediate corticosteroid therapy before lesions become chronic. In some RCTs IgAN patients received six months of RASBs treatment before their enrollment for corticosteroid therapy. In our opinion this approach is not correct because the acute renal lesions evolve in the chronic stage and are no-responsive to corticosteroid therapy. Therefore, the aim of the first RCT is early treatment of the active renal lesions because they are responsible for altered GFR and proteinuria.
The definition of remission or no response of the MESTC lesions to therapy in published studies is inconsistent. Therefore, high-quality clinical trials with a large sample size are necessary to define the response of histological renal lesions to corticosteroids in biopsy-proven IgAN. The kidney biopsy will be analyzed using digital histopathologic analysis coupled with machine-learning tools. At least eight glomeruli will be available for a correct diagnosis. Renal tissue sections will be stained with hematoxylin and eosin, periodic acid-Schiff and methenamine silver. The last edition of the Oxford classification (MESTC) will be used for scoring the renal lesions.
Three independent renal pathologists, blinded to the study results, will score the lesions in the kidney biopsy using the Aperio System. The histology report will be necessary for the enrollment of patients. No larger RCT has confirmed that the disease improves when clinical decisions are made in a short time in the presence of the MESTC score.
- Serum creatinine will be measured using enzymatic methods calibrated to the National Institute of Standards and Technology's (NIST) liquid chromatography isotope dilution mass spectrometry method. eGFR creatinine will be evaluated by the CKD-EPI formula. Moreover, the slope of eGFR (16) will be calculated. Patients, categorized in CKD stages 1 to 3, will be included in the clinical study.
- Proteinuria. Patients will collect 24 hour urine for proteinuria. Values of >0.5 g/ day will be considered abnormal. Proteinuria reduction (geometric mean of 30% within 6 months), time-average proteinuria (TA-P) and slope of proteinuria will be evaluated.
Serum creatinine, proteinuria, age and hypertension have a lower weight when histological lesions are not considered. This finding highlights the importance of the kidney biopsy, not only for diagnosis but for personalized treatment.
- Blood hypertension is defined when values are > 130/80 mmHg or in subjects treated with anti-hypertensive drugs.
- For hyperuricemia allopurinol therapy is recommended.
SAMPLE SIZE CALCULATION.
ACIgAN. Data from the literature show a difference in renal survival between corticosteroids and controls when the researchers assumed a difference of 50% in the primary end point (i.e. in the between-arms difference of delta 24 hour proteinuria from baseline to 6 months) as clinically relevant. We assume that a mean delta proteinuria (±SD) from baseline to 6 months in patients treated with Ramipril alone (control arm) is 0.6±1.0 g/24 hours versus a mean delta proteinuria (±SD) from baseline to 6 months in patients treated with Ramipril and corticosteroids (experimental arm) 1.2±1.0 g/24 hours. Based on these assumptions, we calculated a sample size of 132 patients (66 patients per group including a 10% dropout rate) for a power of 90%, a two-sided significance level of 0.05 and 3 years of recruitment. If the number of the enrolled patients will be insufficient, the recruitment period will be extended for two years. At 4 months, all patients of the control arm who will display a 24 hour proteinuria >0.5g will be switched to the experimental treatment and will receive corticosteroids combined with RASBs for 4 months. They will be followed-up until the study termination.
CHRONIgAN. Data from the literature suggest a difference of renal survival between SGLT2is and controls. Here we assume a difference of 40% in the primary end point (i.e. in the between-arms difference of delta 24 hour proteinuria from baseline to 6 months) as clinically relevant. We assume that a mean delta proteinuria (±SD) from baseline to 6 months in patients with Ramipril alone is 0.6±1.0 g/24 hours versus a mean delta proteinuria (±SD) from baseline to 6 months in patients treated with SGLT-2 inhibitor and Ramipril (1.0±1.0 g/24 hours). Based on these assumptions, we have calculated a sample size of 294 patients (147 patients per group including a 10% dropout rate) for a power of 90%, a two-sided significance level of 0.05 and 3 years of recruitment. If the time-recruitment will be insufficient, the recruitment period will be extended for two years. At 6 months, all patients of the control arm who will display a 24 hour proteinuria >0.5 g will be switched to the experimental treatment (SGLT-2 inhibitor combined with Ramipril). They will be followed-up until the study termination.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 4
- Model description
- After the enrolment the eligible biopsy-proven IgAN patients will be randomized, separately, in each trial in a 1 to 1 ratio via a web-based program generating random numbers. The allocation will be not blinded to the group of assignment.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Corticosteroids combined with RASBs | Experimental | Drug: Corticosteroid, Drug: Renin-angiotensin sytem blockersPatients assigned to the corticosteroid group will receive (pulse) methylprednisolone succinate 500-1000 mg/day for 3 consecutive days followed by oral prednisolone (0.5 mg/kg/bw) on alternate days until the end of month. This treatment will be repeated for three consecutive months. In addition, patients will receive RASBs that will be titrated to their maximum anti-proteinuric effect. The dose of methylprednisolone succinate will be individualized (15 mg/kg) based on the ideal body weight. In overweight and obese IgAN patients the ideal body weight will be considered. The drug will be administered in a single daily dose intravenously for 30-60 min. To avoid obesity and diabetes corticosteroids will be administered only in the morning. |
| RASBs | Active comparator | Drug: Renin-angiotensin sytem blockersPatients will receive RASBs for 3 months, titrated to their maximum anti-proteinuric effectf followed by oral corticosteroids. |
| SGLT2i combined with Ramipril | Experimental | Drug: Renin-angiotensin sytem blockers, Drug: Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitorIgAN patients with chronic renal lesions (T1,2) or moderate renal lesions (M0,1; S0,1; T0; E0; C0) at high or very high CKD risk (proteinuria> 0.5 g/day and GFR >30ml/min/1.73 m2) will receive SGLT2i combined with RASBs. |
| Ramipril combined with corticosteroids | Active comparator | Drug: Corticosteroid, Drug: Renin-angiotensin sytem blockersIgAN patients with chronic renal lesions (T1,2) or moderate renal lesions (M0,1; S0,1; T0; E0; C0) at high or very high CKD risk (proteinuria> 0.5 g/day and GFR >30ml/min/1.73 m2) will receive RASBs for 3 months followed by oral corticosteroids. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Only adult patients (age 18-70 years) with biopsy-proven idiopathic IgAN.
- IgAN patients with active or chronic or moderate renal lesions
Key exclusion criteria (17 listed)
- Patients with idiopathic IgAN and nephrotic syndrome (minimal change disease at kidney biopsy)
- IgAN patients with hematuria and acute renal failure
- IgAN patients with rapidly progressive glomerulonephritis (extracapillary lesions in more than 50% of glomeruli)
- Patients with secondary IgAN (lupus nephritis, Schoenlein-Henoch purpura, liver cirrhosis)
- Any prior immunosuppressive therapy
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| CorticosteroidAlso: Methylprednisolone succinate, prednisoloneTo reduce the progression of renal damage in IgAN Patients | Drug | Corticosteroids combined with RASBs, Ramipril combined with corticosteroids |
| Renin-angiotensin sytem blockersAlso: Ramipril, lisinopril, losartanTo reduce the progression of renal damage in IgAN Patients | Drug | Corticosteroids combined with RASBs, RASBs, Ramipril combined with corticosteroids, SGLT2i combined with Ramipril |
| Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitorAlso: dapagliflozin, canagliflozin, empagliflozinTo reduce the progression of renal damage in IgAN Patients | Drug | SGLT2i combined with Ramipril |
Primary outcome
-Proteinuria reduction within 6 months in IgAN patients with active renal lesions
Time frame: 6th month
Reduction of proteinuria will be calculated as difference betweeen arms within 6 months
Proteinuria reduction within 6 months in IgAN patients with active renal lesions
Time frame: 12th month
Reduction of proteinuria will be calculated as difference betweeen arms within every 6 months
Proteinuria reduction within 6 months in IgAN patients with active renal lesions
Time frame: 18th month
Reduction of proteinuria will be calculated as difference betweeen arms within every 6 months
Proteinuria reduction within 6 months in IgAN patients with active renal lesions
Time frame: 24th month
Reduction of proteinuria will be calculated as difference betweeen arms within every 6 months
Proteinuria reduction within 6 months in IgAN patients with active renal lesions
Time frame: 30th month
Reduction of proteinuria will be calculated as difference betweeen arms within every 6 months
Proteinuria reduction within 6 months in IgAN patients with active renal lesions
Time frame: 36th month
Reduction of proteinuria will be calculated as difference betweeen arms within every 6 months
Proteinuria reduction within 6 months in IgAN patients with chronic renal lesions
Time frame: 6th month
Reduction of proteinuria will be calculated as difference betweeen arms within every 6 months
Proteinuria reduction within 6 months in IgAN patients with chronic renal lesions
Time frame: 12th month
Reduction of proteinuria will be calculated as difference betweeen arms within every 6 months
Proteinuria reduction within 6 months in IgAN with chronic renal lesions
Time frame: 18th month
Reduction of proteinuria will be calculated as difference betweeen arms within every 6 months
Proteinuria reduction within 6 months in IgAN patients with chronic renal lesions
Time frame: 24th month
Reduction of proteinuria will be calculated as difference betweeen arms within every 6 months
Proteinuria reduction within 6 months in IgAN with chronic renal lesions
Time frame: 30th month
Reduction of proteinuria will be calculated as difference betweeen arms within every 6 months
Proteinuria reduction within 6 months in IgAN with chronic renal lesions
Time frame: 36th month
Reduction of proteinuria will be calculated as difference betweeen arms within every 6 months
56 secondary outcomes
eGFR slope change in IgAN patients with active renal lesions
Time frame: 6th month
eGFR slope change in IgAN patients with active renal lesions
Time frame: 12th month
eGFR slope change in IgAN patients with active renal lesions
Time frame: 18th month
eGFR slope change in IgAN patients with active renal lesions
Time frame: 24th month
eGFR slope change in IgAN patients with active renal lesions
Time frame: 30th month
eGFR slope change in IgAN patients with active renal lesions
Time frame: 36th month
eGFR slope change in IgAN patients with chronic renal lesions
Time frame: 6th month
eGFR slope change in IgAN patients with chronic renal lesions
Time frame: 12th month
eGFR slope change in IgAN patients with chronic renal lesions
Time frame: 18th month
eGFR slope change in IgAN patients with chronic renal lesions
Time frame: 24th month
eGFR slope change in IgAN patients with chronic renal lesions
Time frame: 30th month
eGFR slope change in IgAN patients with chronic renal lesions
Time frame: 36th month
eGFR decline >40% in IgAN patients with active renal lesions
Time frame: 6th month
eGFR decline >40% in IgAN patients with active renal lesions
Time frame: 12th month
eGFR decline >40% in IgAN patients with active renal lesions
Time frame: 18th month
eGFR decline >40% in IgAN patients with active renal lesions
Time frame: 24th month
eGFR decline >40% in IgAN patients with active renal lesions
Time frame: 30th month
eGFR decline >40% in IgAN patients with active renal lesions
Time frame: 36th month
eGFR decline >40% in IgAN patients with chronic renal lesions
Time frame: 6th month
eGFR decline >40% in IgAN patients with chronic renal lesions
Time frame: 12th month
eGFR decline >40% in IgAN patients with chronic renal lesions
Time frame: 18th month
eGFR decline >40% in IgAN patients with chronic renal lesions
Time frame: 24th month
eGFR decline >40% in IgAN patients with chronic renal lesions
Time frame: 30th month
eGFR decline >40% in IgAN patients with chronic renal lesions
Time frame: 36th month
composite endpoint: eGFR decline > 40%, ESKD (defined as long-term eGFR < 15 ml/min/1.73m2 for more than 3 months or need of maintenance dialysis or kidney transplantation) and death due to kidney disease in IgAN patients with active renal lesions
Time frame: 6th month
composite endpoint: eGFR decline > 40%, ESKD (defined as long-term eGFR < 15 ml/min/1.73m2 for more than 3 months or need of maintenance dialysis or kidney transplantation) and death due to kidney disease in IgAN patients with active renal lesions
Time frame: 12th month
composite endpoint: eGFR decline > 40%, ESKD (defined as long-term eGFR < 15 ml/min/1.73m2 for more than 3 months or need of maintenance dialysis or kidney transplantation) and death due to kidney disease in IgAN patients with active renal lesions
Time frame: 18th month
composite endpoint: eGFR decline > 40%, ESKD and death due to kidney disease in IgAN patients with active renal lesions
Time frame: 24th month
composite endpoint: eGFR decline > 40%, ESKD and death due to kidney disease in IgAN patients with active renal lesions
Time frame: 30th month
composite endpoint: eGFR decline > 40%, ESKD and death due to kidney disease in IgAN patients with active renal lesions
Time frame: 36th month
composite endpoint: eGFR decline > 40%, ESKD and death due to kidney disease in IgAN patients with chronic renal lesions
Time frame: 6th month
composite endpoint: eGFR decline > 40%, ESKD and death due to kidney disease in IgAN patients with chronic renal lesions
Time frame: 12th month
composite endpoint: eGFR decline > 40%, ESKD and death due to kidney disease. in IgAN patients with chronic renal lesions
Time frame: 18th month
composite endpoint: eGFR decline > 40%, ESKD and death due to kidney disease. in IgAN patients with chronic renal lesions
Time frame: 24th month
composite endpoint: eGFR decline > 40%, ESKD and death due to kidney disease. in IgAN patients with chronic renal lesions
Time frame: 30th month
composite endpoint: eGFR decline > 40%, ESKD and death due to kidney disease. in IgAN patients with chronic renal lesions
Time frame: 36th month
proteinuria reduction (geometric mean of 30% within 6 months)
Time frame: 6th month
proteinuria reduction (geometric mean of 30% within 6 months)
Time frame: 12th month
proteinuria reduction (geometric mean of 30% within 6 months)
Time frame: 18th month
proteinuria reduction (geometric mean of 30% within 6 months)
Time frame: 24th month
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 2 Apr 2025.
- Results publication: PubMed 30177015Schena FP, Nistor I. Epidemiology of IgA Nephropathy: A Global Perspective. Semin Nephrol. 2018 Sep;38(5):435-442. doi: 10.1016/j.semnephrol.2018.05.013.
- Results publication: PubMed 9100040Koyama A, Igarashi M, Kobayashi M. Natural history and risk factors for immunoglobulin A nephropathy in Japan. Research Group on Progressive Renal Diseases. Am J Kidney Dis. 1997 Apr;29(4):526-32. doi: 10.1016/s0272-6386(97)90333-4.
- Results publication: PubMed 17533019Manno C, Strippoli GF, D'Altri C, Torres D, Rossini M, Schena FP. A novel simpler histological classification for renal survival in IgA nephropathy: a retrospective study. Am J Kidney Dis. 2007 Jun;49(6):763-75. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2007.03.013.
- Results publication: PubMed 25018935Chapter 10: Immunoglobulin A nephropathy. Kidney Int Suppl (2011). 2012 Jun;2(2):209-217. doi: 10.1038/kisup.2012.23. No abstract available.
- Results publication: PubMed 32889014Schena FP, Anelli VW, Trotta J, Di Noia T, Manno C, Tripepi G, D'Arrigo G, Chesnaye NC, Russo ML, Stangou M, Papagianni A, Zoccali C, Tesar V, Coppo R; members of the VALIGA study. Development and testing of an artificial intelligence tool for predicting end-stage kidney disease in patients with immunoglobulin A nephropathy. Kidney Int. 2021 May;99(5):1179-1188. doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2020.07.046. Epub 2020 Sep 2.
- Results publication: PubMed 19571790Working Group of the International IgA Nephropathy Network and the Renal Pathology Society; Roberts IS, Cook HT, Troyanov S, Alpers CE, Amore A, Barratt J, Berthoux F, Bonsib S, Bruijn JA, Cattran DC, Coppo R, D'Agati V, D'Amico G, Emancipator S, Emma F, Feehally J, Ferrario F, Fervenza FC, Florquin S, Fogo A, Geddes CC, Groene HJ, Haas M, Herzenberg AM, Hill PA, Hogg RJ, Hsu SI, Jennette JC, Joh K, Julian BA, Kawamura T, Lai FM, Li LS, Li PK, Liu ZH, Mackinnon B, Mezzano S, Schena FP, Tomino Y, Walker PD, Wang H, Weening JJ, Yoshikawa N, Zhang H. The Oxford classification of IgA nephropathy: pathology definitions, correlations, and reproducibility. Kidney Int. 2009 Sep;76(5):546-56. doi: 10.1038/ki.2009.168. Epub 2009 Jul 1.
- Results publication: PubMed 19571791Working Group of the International IgA Nephropathy Network and the Renal Pathology Society; Cattran DC, Coppo R, Cook HT, Feehally J, Roberts IS, Troyanov S, Alpers CE, Amore A, Barratt J, Berthoux F, Bonsib S, Bruijn JA, D'Agati V, D'Amico G, Emancipator S, Emma F, Ferrario F, Fervenza FC, Florquin S, Fogo A, Geddes CC, Groene HJ, Haas M, Herzenberg AM, Hill PA, Hogg RJ, Hsu SI, Jennette JC, Joh K, Julian BA, Kawamura T, Lai FM, Leung CB, Li LS, Li PK, Liu ZH, Mackinnon B, Mezzano S, Schena FP, Tomino Y, Walker PD, Wang H, Weening JJ, Yoshikawa N, Zhang H. The Oxford classification of IgA nephropathy: rationale, clinicopathological correlations, and classification. Kidney Int. 2009 Sep;76(5):534-45. doi: 10.1038/ki.2009.243. Epub 2009 Jul 1.
- Results publication: PubMed 21606384Kang SH, Choi SR, Park HS, Lee JY, Sun IO, Hwang HS, Chung BH, Park CW, Yang CW, Kim YS, Choi YJ, Choi BS. The Oxford classification as a predictor of prognosis in patients with IgA nephropathy. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2012 Jan;27(1):252-8. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfr295. Epub 2011 May 23.
- Results publication: PubMed 26630142Rauen T, Eitner F, Fitzner C, Sommerer C, Zeier M, Otte B, Panzer U, Peters H, Benck U, Mertens PR, Kuhlmann U, Witzke O, Gross O, Vielhauer V, Mann JF, Hilgers RD, Floege J; STOP-IgAN Investigators. Intensive Supportive Care plus Immunosuppression in IgA Nephropathy. N Engl J Med. 2015 Dec 3;373(23):2225-36. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1415463.
- Results publication: PubMed 28763548Lv J, Zhang H, Wong MG, Jardine MJ, Hladunewich M, Jha V, Monaghan H, Zhao M, Barbour S, Reich H, Cattran D, Glassock R, Levin A, Wheeler D, Woodward M, Billot L, Chan TM, Liu ZH, Johnson DW, Cass A, Feehally J, Floege J, Remuzzi G, Wu Y, Agarwal R, Wang HY, Perkovic V; TESTING Study Group. Effect of Oral Methylprednisolone on Clinical Outcomes in Patients With IgA Nephropathy: The TESTING Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2017 Aug 1;318(5):432-442. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.9362.
- Results publication: PubMed 25585823Shen XH, Liang SS, Chen HM, Le WB, Jiang S, Zeng CH, Zhou ML, Zhang HT, Liu ZH. Reversal of active glomerular lesions after immunosuppressive therapy in patients with IgA nephropathy: a repeat-biopsy based observation. J Nephrol. 2015 Aug;28(4):441-9. doi: 10.1007/s40620-014-0165-x. Epub 2015 Jan 14.
- Results publication: PubMed 21852672Shi SF, Wang SX, Jiang L, Lv JC, Liu LJ, Chen YQ, Zhu SN, Liu G, Zou WZ, Zhang H, Wang HY. Pathologic predictors of renal outcome and therapeutic efficacy in IgA nephropathy: validation of the oxford classification. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2011 Sep;6(9):2175-84. doi: 10.2215/CJN.11521210. Epub 2011 Aug 18.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. IPD will be shared with other partners
Related trials for Glomerulonephritis
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study to Find Out if BI 764198 Helps Adults and Adolescents With a Kidney Condition Called Focal Segmental Glomerulosclerosis (FSGS)
Focal Segmental Glomerulosclerosis
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
A Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Pegcetacoplan for the Prevention of Recurrent C3G or Primary IC-MPGN in Kidney Transplant Recipients
C3 Glomerulopathy (C3G), Primary Immune-Complex Membranoproliferative Glomerulonephritis (IC-MPGN), Recurrent Glomerular Disease After Kidney Transplantation
Not yet recruiting
MYTP01 for Immune-Mediated Diseases
IgA Nephropathy, Kidney Transplant Recipients
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Phase I/II Study of AD-PluReceptor Plus Tafasitamab-cxix and Lymphodepleting Chemotherapy in Patients With Autoimmune Disorders
Autoimmune Disorders, Systemic Sclerosis
RecruitingPhase 2
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, and Pharmacokinetics of Obinutuzumab in Adolescents With Active Class III or IV Lupus Nephritis and the Safety and PK of Obinutuzumab in Pediatric Participants
Lupus Nephritis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Francesco P Schena study chair
Fondazione Schena
francesco P Schena study director
Fondazione Schena
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Corticosteroid, Renin-angiotensin sytem blockers and Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor in people with Glomerulonephritis and Immunoglobulin A Nephropathy, run by Fondazione Schena at 2 sites in Italy.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 17 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 2 Apr 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Francesco P Schena (3336771291 ext. 0039, paolo.schena@uniba.it), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
-Proteinuria reduction within 6 months in IgAN patients with active renal lesions (time frame: 6th month). The study lists 12 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04662723, which also lists 23 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 2 Apr 2025.