AzTrials
AzTrials

GlomerulonephritisPhase 4CLIgANNCT04662723

Multicentre Clinical Study to Evaluate the Effect of Personalized Therapy on Patients With Immunoglobulin A Nephropathy.

A Phase 4 study testing Corticosteroid, Renin-angiotensin sytem blockers and Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor in people with Glomerulonephritis and Immunoglobulin A Nephropathy, run by Fondazione Schena at 2 sites in Italy.

Recruiting

Looking for participants now. Contact the study team or a site below to ask about taking part.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Idiopathic immunoglobulin A nephropathy (IgAN) is the most common biopsy-proven glomerulonephritis in the world. Approximately 40% of IgAN patients reach end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) 20 years after their kidney biopsy. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
What is being tested?
Corticosteroid, Renin-angiotensin sytem blockers and Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
878 participants
Where
2 sitesItaly
Study dates
1 May 2023to 31 Dec 2028
Phase
Phase 4
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Only adult patients (age 18-70 years) with biopsy-proven idiopathic IgAN.
  • IgAN patients with active or chronic or moderate renal lesions

Who cannot join

  • Patients with idiopathic IgAN and nephrotic syndrome (minimal change disease at kidney biopsy)
  • IgAN patients with hematuria and acute renal failure
  • IgAN patients with rapidly progressive glomerulonephritis (extracapillary lesions in more than 50% of glomeruli)
  • Patients with secondary IgAN (lupus nephritis, Schoenlein-Henoch purpura, liver cirrhosis)
  • Any prior immunosuppressive therapy
  • Superimposed IgAN in kidney transplant
Show all 17Show fewer
  • Severe liver diseases
  • Infections
  • Malignancies
  • Pregnancy
  • Patients with myocardial infarction or cerebrovascular stroke in the previous 6 months
  • Uncontrolled diabetes
  • Aseptic necrosis of any bone
  • Other conditions that can be exacerbated by corticosteroids
  • Previous adverse side effects to RASBs
  • Previous adverse side effects to SGLT2is
  • Patients with mild renal lesions (M0,E0,S0,T0,C0), minor urinary findings, proteinuria < 0.5 g/day, normal GFR and normal blood pressure

Trial locations and contacts

2 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Italy2 sites, 2 recruiting
  • francesco paolo Schena

    Bari, BA, 70124

    Francesco P Schena, MD, 3336771291, paolo.schena@uniba.it

    Recruiting
  • francesco paolo Schena

    Bari, BA, 70124

    francesco P Schena, 3336771291, fp.schena@gmail.com

    Recruiting

Other trials in Italy

About this study

Official title: Multicentre Prospective Open Label Clinical Study to Evaluate the Effect of Personalized Therapy on Patients With Immunoglobulin A Nephropathy.

Idiopathic immunoglobulin A nephropathy (IgAN) is the most common biopsy-proven glomerulonephritis in the world. Approximately 40% of IgAN patients reach end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) 20 years after their kidney biopsy. The high prevalence of ESKD suggests the need to move from a generalized therapy for all patients to personalized therapy.

Many RCTs have been conducted stratifying patients based on the laboratory findings (serum creatinine, eGFR and daily proteinuria). In contrast, data from the kidney biopsy has been used only for clinical diagnosis. Therefore, IgAN patients with active or chronic renal lesions have not been equally distributed in experimental and control arms of the randomized clinical trials (RCTs) Our clinical study of IgAN (CLIgAN) is a multicentre, prospective, controlled and open-label randomized clinical trial based on patients' stratification at the time of their kidney biopsy. The investigators will consider, first, the type of renal lesions followed by the serum creatinine values, eGFR and proteinuria. IgAN patients with active renal lesions (n=132) will be enrolled in the first RCT (ACIgAN) in which they will receive corticosteroids (pulse therapy) plus oral corticosteroids combined with RASB or RASB followed by oral corticosteroids. IgAN patients with chronic or moderate renal lesions at high or very high risk of chronic renal disease (n=294) will be enrolled in the second RCT (CHRONIgAN) in which they will receive the SGLT2 inhibitor combined with RASB compared with RASB combined with oral corticosteroids. Using this approach, the investigators hypothesize that patients could receive personalized therapy based on renal lesions to ensure that the right drug gets to the right patient at the right time.

Read more

Recently, we developed a Clinical Decision Support System (CDSS) tool using artificial intelligence (artificial neural networks) to identify IgAN patients at high risk of developing ESKD. The IgAN tool (DialCheck) was validated in a retrospective cohort of IgAN patients but not in a prospective clinical study. The investigators propose to measure the power of the DiaCheck tool in patients enrolled in both RCTs to determine whether personalized therapy can slow the decline of the renal function to delay the ESKD.

The CLIgAN study also includes a cutting-edge molecular study for precision therapy (PRECIgAN).

Read the detailed description

BACKGROUND AND RATIONALE. Idiopathic Immunoglobulin A nephropathy (IgAN) is the most common biopsy-proven glomerulonephritis in the world. It is more prevalent in Asia than in Europe and the US. Approximately 40% of IgAN patients reach end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) 20 years after their kidney biopsy. The high prevalence of ESKD shows that IgAN has a significant economic impact in the all countries because renal replacement therapy is costly. Moreover, the disease's onset in the second and third decades of life represents a social challenge because young adult patients are very active and highly productive in the workplace. This challenge is one more reason to move from a generalized therapy for all patients to a personalized therapy.

The first edition of the KDIGO guidelines, published in 2012, suggested different therapeutic approaches for IgAN patients based on the clinical setting. However, the KDIGO guidelines do not consider the presence of active (endocapillary and extracapillary lesions) and chronic (tubulointerstitial lesions) renal lesions at the time of the kidney biopsy for therapy decision. The investigators of the clinical study in IgAN patients (CLIgAN) will consider for the patient's stratification the type of renal lesions, preliminarily, and then the clinical parameters as estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and proteinuria because the categorization of proteinuria and eGFR is not enough for a complete diagnosis of the disease.

AIMS. Considering the critical role of kidney biopsy, in the CLIgAN study the investigators plan to evaluate (i) the effect of corticosteroids combined with RASBs in IgAN patients with active renal lesions (ACIgAN) versus RASBs for 3 months followed by oral corticosteroids to determine whether the renal lesions are reversed by immediate corticosteroid therapy; (ii) the effect of SGLT2i in patients with chronic or moderate renal lesions (CHRONIgAN) to determine whether a delay of the ESKD onset is achieved; (iii) after the prediction of ESKD through the IgAN CDSS tool (DialCheck), to determine whether personalized therapy delays the impairment of the renal function; (iv) finally, on a small cohort of active and chronic IgAN patients enrolled in the CLIgAN study, a cutting edge-molecular study will be conducted to evaluate the effect of precision therapy (PRECIgAN).

STUDY DESIGN. The investigators have designed a prospective, multicentre, open-label clinical study that includes two multicentre randomized controlled trials (RCTs) based on the kidney biopsy report.

In the first RCT, patients with active renal lesions (E1 and/or C1), daily proteinuria >0.5 g and GFR ≥ 30 ml/min/1.72 m2 will be enrolled. They will be randomized to receive corticosteroids combined with RASBs in the experimental arm or RASBs alone in the control arm. Aim of this trial is to demostrate the benefit of corticosteroids in patients with active renal lesions.

In the second RCT, patients with chronic renal lesions (T1,2) and patients with moderate renal lesions (M0,1; S0,1; T0; E0; C0) at high or very high CKD risk (proteinuria> 0.5 g/day and GFR ≥ 30ml/min/1.73 m2) will be enrolled. They will be randomized to receive SGLT2 inhibitor (SGLT2i) combined with RASBs (experimental arm) or RASBs combined with corticosteroids (control arm). Aim of this trial is demostrate the benefit of SGLT2i combined with RASBs.

In conclusion, we have designed two RCTs (i) to study personalized therapy in biopsy-proven IgAN patients and (II) to monitor the outcomes to look at whether personalized therapy may delay the time to reach the ESKD predicted by our IgAN tool.

RECRUITMENT AND FOLLOW-UP. Renal Units will be involved in the enrollment of IgAN patients during a period of three years. The follow-up study to measure the outcomes will consist of regular visits at the prescribed times and to collect clinical and laboratory data and information on drug adherence. At the end of the trial, each patient will receive a final visit in the outpatient section.

OTHER MEAUSURES. Age, body mass index, eradication of infectious foci, or concurrent antibiotic therapy to prevent infections or to avoid the transformation of a trivial infection into a severe complication will be considered. Covid-19 vaccination will be done in all patients who will receive corticosteroids therapy. In addition, home and life conditions and culture will be analyzed. Regular daily exercise to prevent obesity and cardiovascular disease will be prescribed.

Dietary counseling. Patients with CKD stage 1 and 2 will observe the Mediterranean diet combined with reduced intake of proteins (1.0 - 0.8 g/kg bw/day). A reduced intake of proteins (0.6 - 0.8 g/kg bw/day) will also be prescribed to patients with CKD stage 3. Salt intake will be limited to 1.5 g/day. Dietary compliance will be assessed by measuring daily urinary sodium and urea excretion. Physical activity will be observed for 30 min. every day, primarily in the morning.

Severe adverse events. Infections, impaired glucose tolerance, weight gain, hypoglycemia will be monitored during the follow-up.

VARIABLES OF THE DISEASE. Kidney biopsy will be scored according to the Oxford classification because it is a simple method for predicting renal outcomes and for differentiating active and chronic renal lesions. Therefore, the kidney biopsy will be the principal key-note, not only for diagnosis but also for personalized therapy, because active renal lesions will be treated with immediate corticosteroid therapy before lesions become chronic. In some RCTs IgAN patients received six months of RASBs treatment before their enrollment for corticosteroid therapy. In our opinion this approach is not correct because the acute renal lesions evolve in the chronic stage and are no-responsive to corticosteroid therapy. Therefore, the aim of the first RCT is early treatment of the active renal lesions because they are responsible for altered GFR and proteinuria.

The definition of remission or no response of the MESTC lesions to therapy in published studies is inconsistent. Therefore, high-quality clinical trials with a large sample size are necessary to define the response of histological renal lesions to corticosteroids in biopsy-proven IgAN. The kidney biopsy will be analyzed using digital histopathologic analysis coupled with machine-learning tools. At least eight glomeruli will be available for a correct diagnosis. Renal tissue sections will be stained with hematoxylin and eosin, periodic acid-Schiff and methenamine silver. The last edition of the Oxford classification (MESTC) will be used for scoring the renal lesions.

Three independent renal pathologists, blinded to the study results, will score the lesions in the kidney biopsy using the Aperio System. The histology report will be necessary for the enrollment of patients. No larger RCT has confirmed that the disease improves when clinical decisions are made in a short time in the presence of the MESTC score.

  • Serum creatinine will be measured using enzymatic methods calibrated to the National Institute of Standards and Technology's (NIST) liquid chromatography isotope dilution mass spectrometry method. eGFR creatinine will be evaluated by the CKD-EPI formula. Moreover, the slope of eGFR (16) will be calculated. Patients, categorized in CKD stages 1 to 3, will be included in the clinical study.
  • Proteinuria. Patients will collect 24 hour urine for proteinuria. Values of >0.5 g/ day will be considered abnormal. Proteinuria reduction (geometric mean of 30% within 6 months), time-average proteinuria (TA-P) and slope of proteinuria will be evaluated.

Serum creatinine, proteinuria, age and hypertension have a lower weight when histological lesions are not considered. This finding highlights the importance of the kidney biopsy, not only for diagnosis but for personalized treatment.

  • Blood hypertension is defined when values are > 130/80 mmHg or in subjects treated with anti-hypertensive drugs.
  • For hyperuricemia allopurinol therapy is recommended.

SAMPLE SIZE CALCULATION.

ACIgAN. Data from the literature show a difference in renal survival between corticosteroids and controls when the researchers assumed a difference of 50% in the primary end point (i.e. in the between-arms difference of delta 24 hour proteinuria from baseline to 6 months) as clinically relevant. We assume that a mean delta proteinuria (±SD) from baseline to 6 months in patients treated with Ramipril alone (control arm) is 0.6±1.0 g/24 hours versus a mean delta proteinuria (±SD) from baseline to 6 months in patients treated with Ramipril and corticosteroids (experimental arm) 1.2±1.0 g/24 hours. Based on these assumptions, we calculated a sample size of 132 patients (66 patients per group including a 10% dropout rate) for a power of 90%, a two-sided significance level of 0.05 and 3 years of recruitment. If the number of the enrolled patients will be insufficient, the recruitment period will be extended for two years. At 4 months, all patients of the control arm who will display a 24 hour proteinuria >0.5g will be switched to the experimental treatment and will receive corticosteroids combined with RASBs for 4 months. They will be followed-up until the study termination.

CHRONIgAN. Data from the literature suggest a difference of renal survival between SGLT2is and controls. Here we assume a difference of 40% in the primary end point (i.e. in the between-arms difference of delta 24 hour proteinuria from baseline to 6 months) as clinically relevant. We assume that a mean delta proteinuria (±SD) from baseline to 6 months in patients with Ramipril alone is 0.6±1.0 g/24 hours versus a mean delta proteinuria (±SD) from baseline to 6 months in patients treated with SGLT-2 inhibitor and Ramipril (1.0±1.0 g/24 hours). Based on these assumptions, we have calculated a sample size of 294 patients (147 patients per group including a 10% dropout rate) for a power of 90%, a two-sided significance level of 0.05 and 3 years of recruitment. If the time-recruitment will be insufficient, the recruitment period will be extended for two years. At 6 months, all patients of the control arm who will display a 24 hour proteinuria >0.5 g will be switched to the experimental treatment (SGLT-2 inhibitor combined with Ramipril). They will be followed-up until the study termination.

Being tested
Corticosteroid, Renin-angiotensin sytem blockers, Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor
Keywords
IgA nephropathy, Steroids, RAS-blockers, SGLT2-inhibitors
Medical subject headings
Glomerulonephritis, Glomerulonephritis, IGA

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • CorticosteroidDrug

    Also called Methylprednisolone succinate, prednisolone

    To reduce the progression of renal damage in IgAN Patients

  • Renin-angiotensin sytem blockersDrug

    Also called Ramipril, lisinopril, losartan

    To reduce the progression of renal damage in IgAN Patients

  • Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitorDrug

    Also called dapagliflozin, canagliflozin, empagliflozin

    To reduce the progression of renal damage in IgAN Patients

Study groups in NCT04662723
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Corticosteroids combined with RASBsExperimentalPatients assigned to the corticosteroid group will receive (pulse) methylprednisolone succinate 500-1000 mg/day for 3 consecutive days followed by oral prednisolone (0.5 mg/kg/bw) on alternate days until the end of month. This treatment will be repeated for three consecutive months. In addition, patients will receive RASBs that will be titrated to their maximum anti-proteinuric effect. The dose of methylprednisolone succinate will be individualized (15 mg/kg) based on the ideal body weight. In overweight and obese IgAN patients the ideal body weight will be considered. The drug will be administered in a single daily dose intravenously for 30-60 min. To avoid obesity and diabetes corticosteroids will be administered only in the morning.
Receives: Drug: Corticosteroid; Drug: Renin-angiotensin sytem blockers
RASBsActive comparatorPatients will receive RASBs for 3 months, titrated to their maximum anti-proteinuric effectf followed by oral corticosteroids.
Receives: Drug: Renin-angiotensin sytem blockers
SGLT2i combined with RamiprilExperimentalIgAN patients with chronic renal lesions (T1,2) or moderate renal lesions (M0,1; S0,1; T0; E0; C0) at high or very high CKD risk (proteinuria> 0.5 g/day and GFR >30ml/min/1.73 m2) will receive SGLT2i combined with RASBs.
Receives: Drug: Renin-angiotensin sytem blockers; Drug: Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor
Ramipril combined with corticosteroidsActive comparatorIgAN patients with chronic renal lesions (T1,2) or moderate renal lesions (M0,1; S0,1; T0; E0; C0) at high or very high CKD risk (proteinuria> 0.5 g/day and GFR >30ml/min/1.73 m2) will receive RASBs for 3 months followed by oral corticosteroids.
Receives: Drug: Corticosteroid; Drug: Renin-angiotensin sytem blockers

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. -Proteinuria reduction within 6 months in IgAN patients with active renal lesions

    Reduction of proteinuria will be calculated as difference betweeen arms within 6 months

    Measured: 6th month

  2. Proteinuria reduction within 6 months in IgAN patients with active renal lesions

    Reduction of proteinuria will be calculated as difference betweeen arms within every 6 months

    Measured: 12th month

  3. Proteinuria reduction within 6 months in IgAN patients with active renal lesions

    Reduction of proteinuria will be calculated as difference betweeen arms within every 6 months

    Measured: 18th month

  4. Proteinuria reduction within 6 months in IgAN patients with active renal lesions

    Reduction of proteinuria will be calculated as difference betweeen arms within every 6 months

    Measured: 24th month

  5. Proteinuria reduction within 6 months in IgAN patients with active renal lesions

    Reduction of proteinuria will be calculated as difference betweeen arms within every 6 months

    Measured: 30th month

  6. Proteinuria reduction within 6 months in IgAN patients with active renal lesions

    Reduction of proteinuria will be calculated as difference betweeen arms within every 6 months

    Measured: 36th month

  7. Proteinuria reduction within 6 months in IgAN patients with chronic renal lesions

    Reduction of proteinuria will be calculated as difference betweeen arms within every 6 months

    Measured: 6th month

  8. Proteinuria reduction within 6 months in IgAN patients with chronic renal lesions

    Reduction of proteinuria will be calculated as difference betweeen arms within every 6 months

    Measured: 12th month

  9. Proteinuria reduction within 6 months in IgAN with chronic renal lesions

    Reduction of proteinuria will be calculated as difference betweeen arms within every 6 months

    Measured: 18th month

  10. Proteinuria reduction within 6 months in IgAN patients with chronic renal lesions

    Reduction of proteinuria will be calculated as difference betweeen arms within every 6 months

    Measured: 24th month

  11. Proteinuria reduction within 6 months in IgAN with chronic renal lesions

    Reduction of proteinuria will be calculated as difference betweeen arms within every 6 months

    Measured: 30th month

  12. Proteinuria reduction within 6 months in IgAN with chronic renal lesions

    Reduction of proteinuria will be calculated as difference betweeen arms within every 6 months

    Measured: 36th month

Secondary outcomes (56)
  1. eGFR slope change in IgAN patients with active renal lesions

    eGFR slope change calculated as the mean of the individual slopes obtained from individual linear regression of eGFR over time;

    Measured: 6th month

  2. eGFR slope change in IgAN patients with active renal lesions

    eGFR slope change calculated as the mean of the individual slopes obtained from individual linear regression of eGFR over time;

    Measured: 12th month

  3. eGFR slope change in IgAN patients with active renal lesions

    eGFR slope change calculated as the mean of the individual slopes obtained from individual linear regression of eGFR over time;

    Measured: 18th month

  4. eGFR slope change in IgAN patients with active renal lesions

    eGFR slope change calculated as the mean of the individual slopes obtained from individual linear regression of eGFR over time;

    Measured: 24th month

  5. eGFR slope change in IgAN patients with active renal lesions

    eGFR slope change calculated as the mean of the individual slopes obtained from individual linear regression of eGFR over time;

    Measured: 30th month

  6. eGFR slope change in IgAN patients with active renal lesions

    eGFR slope change calculated as the mean of the individual slopes obtained from individual linear regression of eGFR over time;

    Measured: 36th month

  7. eGFR slope change in IgAN patients with chronic renal lesions

    eGFR slope change calculated as the mean of the individual slopes obtained from individual linear regression of eGFR over time;

    Measured: 6th month

  8. eGFR slope change in IgAN patients with chronic renal lesions

    eGFR slope change calculated as the mean of the individual slopes obtained from individual linear regression of eGFR over time;

    Measured: 12th month

  9. eGFR slope change in IgAN patients with chronic renal lesions

    eGFR slope change calculated as the mean of the individual slopes obtained from individual linear regression of eGFR over time;

    Measured: 18th month

  10. eGFR slope change in IgAN patients with chronic renal lesions

    eGFR slope change calculated as the mean of the individual slopes obtained from individual linear regression of eGFR over time;

    Measured: 24th month

  11. eGFR slope change in IgAN patients with chronic renal lesions

    eGFR slope change calculated as the mean of the individual slopes obtained from individual linear regression of eGFR over time;

    Measured: 30th month

  12. eGFR slope change in IgAN patients with chronic renal lesions

    eGFR slope change calculated as the mean of the individual slopes obtained from individual linear regression of eGFR over time;

    Measured: 36th month

  13. eGFR decline >40% in IgAN patients with active renal lesions

    eGFR decline >40% in IgAN patients with active renal lesions

    Measured: 6th month

  14. eGFR decline >40% in IgAN patients with active renal lesions

    eGFR decline >40% in IgAN patients with active renal lesions

    Measured: 12th month

  15. eGFR decline >40% in IgAN patients with active renal lesions

    eGFR decline >40% in IgAN patients with active renal lesions

    Measured: 18th month

  16. eGFR decline >40% in IgAN patients with active renal lesions

    eGFR decline >40% in IgAN patients with active renal lesions

    Measured: 24th month

  17. eGFR decline >40% in IgAN patients with active renal lesions

    eGFR decline >40% in IgAN patients with active renal lesions

    Measured: 30th month

  18. eGFR decline >40% in IgAN patients with active renal lesions

    eGFR decline >40% in IgAN patients with active renal lesions

    Measured: 36th month

  19. eGFR decline >40% in IgAN patients with chronic renal lesions

    eGFR decline >40% in IgAN patients with chronic renal lesions

    Measured: 6th month

  20. eGFR decline >40% in IgAN patients with chronic renal lesions

    eGFR decline >40% in IgAN patients with chronic renal lesions

    Measured: 12th month

  21. eGFR decline >40% in IgAN patients with chronic renal lesions

    eGFR decline >40% in IgAN patients with chronic renal lesions

    Measured: 18th month

  22. eGFR decline >40% in IgAN patients with chronic renal lesions

    eGFR decline >40% in IgAN patients with chronic renal lesions

    Measured: 24th month

  23. eGFR decline >40% in IgAN patients with chronic renal lesions

    eGFR decline >40% in IgAN patients with chronic renal lesions

    Measured: 30th month

  24. eGFR decline >40% in IgAN patients with chronic renal lesions

    eGFR decline >40% in IgAN patients with chronic renal lesions

    Measured: 36th month

  25. composite endpoint: eGFR decline > 40%, ESKD (defined as long-term eGFR < 15 ml/min/1.73m2 for more than 3 months or need of maintenance dialysis or kidney transplantation) and death due to kidney disease in IgAN patients with active renal lesions

    composite endpoint: eGFR decline > 40%, ESKD (defined as long-term eGFR < 15 ml/min/1.73m2 for more than 3 months or need of maintenance dialysis or kidney transplantation) and death due to kidney disease in IgAN patients with active renal lesions

    Measured: 6th month

  26. composite endpoint: eGFR decline > 40%, ESKD (defined as long-term eGFR < 15 ml/min/1.73m2 for more than 3 months or need of maintenance dialysis or kidney transplantation) and death due to kidney disease in IgAN patients with active renal lesions

    composite endpoint: eGFR decline > 40%, ESKD (defined as long-term eGFR < 15 ml/min/1.73m2 for more than 3 months or need of maintenance dialysis or kidney transplantation) and death due to kidney disease in IgAN patients with active renal lesions

    Measured: 12th month

  27. composite endpoint: eGFR decline > 40%, ESKD (defined as long-term eGFR < 15 ml/min/1.73m2 for more than 3 months or need of maintenance dialysis or kidney transplantation) and death due to kidney disease in IgAN patients with active renal lesions

    composite endpoint: eGFR decline > 40%, ESKD (defined as long-term eGFR < 15 ml/min/1.73m2 for more than 3 months or need of maintenance dialysis or kidney transplantation) and death due to kidney disease in IgAN patients with active renal lesions

    Measured: 18th month

  28. composite endpoint: eGFR decline > 40%, ESKD and death due to kidney disease in IgAN patients with active renal lesions

    composite endpoint: eGFR decline > 40%, ESKD (defined as long-term eGFR < 15 ml/min/1.73m2 for more than 3 months or need of maintenance dialysis or kidney transplantation) and death due to kidney disease in IgAN patients with active renal lesions

    Measured: 24th month

  29. composite endpoint: eGFR decline > 40%, ESKD and death due to kidney disease in IgAN patients with active renal lesions

    composite endpoint: eGFR decline > 40%, ESKD (defined as long-term eGFR < 15 ml/min/1.73m2 for more than 3 months or need of maintenance dialysis or kidney transplantation) and death due to kidney disease in IgAN patients with active renal lesions

    Measured: 30th month

  30. composite endpoint: eGFR decline > 40%, ESKD and death due to kidney disease in IgAN patients with active renal lesions

    composite endpoint: eGFR decline > 40%, ESKD (defined as long-term eGFR < 15 ml/min/1.73m2 for more than 3 months or need of maintenance dialysis or kidney transplantation) and death due to kidney disease in IgAN patients with active renal lesions

    Measured: 36th month

  31. composite endpoint: eGFR decline > 40%, ESKD and death due to kidney disease in IgAN patients with chronic renal lesions

    composite endpoint: eGFR decline > 40%, ESKD (defined as long-term eGFR < 15 ml/min/1.73m2 for more than 3 months or need of maintenance dialysis or kidney transplantation) and death due to kidney disease in IgAN patients with chronic rena lesions

    Measured: 6th month

  32. composite endpoint: eGFR decline > 40%, ESKD and death due to kidney disease in IgAN patients with chronic renal lesions

    composite endpoint: eGFR decline > 40%, ESKD (defined as long-term eGFR < 15 ml/min/1.73m2 for more than 3 months or need of maintenance dialysis or kidney transplantation) and death due to kidney disease in IgAN patients with chronic rena lesions

    Measured: 12th month

  33. composite endpoint: eGFR decline > 40%, ESKD and death due to kidney disease. in IgAN patients with chronic renal lesions

    composite endpoint: eGFR decline > 40%, ESKD (defined as long-term eGFR < 15 ml/min/1.73m2 for more than 3 months or need of maintenance dialysis or kidney transplantation) and death due to kidney disease in IgAN patients with chronic renal lesions

    Measured: 18th month

  34. composite endpoint: eGFR decline > 40%, ESKD and death due to kidney disease. in IgAN patients with chronic renal lesions

    composite endpoint: eGFR decline > 40%, ESKD (defined as long-term eGFR < 15 ml/min/1.73m2 for more than 3 months or need of maintenance dialysis or kidney transplantation) and death due to kidney disease in IgAN patients with chronic renal lesions

    Measured: 24th month

  35. composite endpoint: eGFR decline > 40%, ESKD and death due to kidney disease. in IgAN patients with chronic renal lesions

    composite endpoint: eGFR decline > 40%, ESKD (defined as long-term eGFR < 15 ml/min/1.73m2 for more than 3 months or need of maintenance dialysis or kidney transplantation) and death due to kidney disease in IgAN patients with chronic renal lesions

    Measured: 30th month

  36. composite endpoint: eGFR decline > 40%, ESKD and death due to kidney disease. in IgAN patients with chronic renal lesions

    composite endpoint: eGFR decline > 40%, ESKD (defined as long-term eGFR < 15 ml/min/1.73m2 for more than 3 months or need of maintenance dialysis or kidney transplantation) and death due to kidney disease in IgAN patients with chronic renal lesions

    Measured: 36th month

  37. proteinuria reduction (geometric mean of 30% within 6 months)

    proteinuria reduction in IgAN patients with chronic renal lesions

    Measured: 6th month

  38. proteinuria reduction (geometric mean of 30% within 6 months)

    proteinuria reduction in IgAN patients with chronic renal lesions

    Measured: 12th month

  39. proteinuria reduction (geometric mean of 30% within 6 months)

    proteinuria reduction in IgAN patients with chronic renal lesions

    Measured: 18th month

  40. proteinuria reduction (geometric mean of 30% within 6 months)

    proteinuria reduction in IgAN patients with chronic renal lesions

    Measured: 24th month

  41. proteinuria reduction (geometric mean of 30% within 6 months)

    proteinuria reduction in IgAN patients with chronic renal lesions

    Measured: 30th month

  42. proteinuria reduction (geometric mean of 30% within 6 months)

    proteinuria reduction in IgAN patients with chronic renal lesions

    Measured: 36th month

  43. time-averaged proteinuria (TA-P) calculated as the weighted mean of all post-randomization measurement, with weights representing the time elapsed since the previous measurement in IgAN patients with active renal lesions

    time-averaged proteinuria (TA-P) calculated as the weighted mean of all post-randomization measurement, with weights representing the time elapsed since the previous measurement

    Measured: 3rd month

  44. time-averaged proteinuria (TA-P) calculated as the weighted mean of all post-randomization measurement, with weights representing the time elapsed since the previous measurement in IgAN patients with active renal lesions

    time-averaged proteinuria (TA-P) calculated as the weighted mean of all post-randomization measurement, with weights representing the time elapsed since the previous measurement

    Measured: 6th month

  45. time-averaged proteinuria (TA-P) calculated as the weighted mean of all post-randomization measurement, with weights representing the time elapsed since the previous measurement in IgAN patients with active renal lesions

    time-averaged proteinuria (TA-P) calculated as the weighted mean of all post-randomization measurement, with weights representing the time elapsed since the previous measurement

    Measured: 9th month

  46. time-averaged proteinuria (TA-P) calculated as the weighted mean of all post-randomization measurement, with weights representing the time elapsed since the previous measurement in IgAN patients with active renal lesions

    time-averaged proteinuria (TA-P) calculated as the weighted mean of all post-randomization measurement, with weights representing the time elapsed since the previous measurement

    Measured: 12th month

  47. time-averaged proteinuria (TA-P) calculated as the weighted mean of all post-randomization measurement, with weights representing the time elapsed since the previous measurement in IgAN patients with active renal lesions

    time-averaged proteinuria (TA-P) calculated as the weighted mean of all post-randomization measurement, with weights representing the time elapsed since the previous measurement

    Measured: 18th month

  48. time-averaged proteinuria (TA-P) calculated as the weighted mean of all post-randomization measurement, with weights representing the time elapsed since the previous measurement in IgAN patients with active renal lesions

    time-averaged proteinuria (TA-P) calculated as the weighted mean of all post-randomization measurement, with weights representing the time elapsed since the previous measurement

    Measured: 24th month

  49. time-averaged proteinuria (TA-P) calculated as the weighted mean of all post-randomization measurement, with weights representing the time elapsed since the previous measurement in IgAN patients with active renal lesions

    time-averaged proteinuria (TA-P) calculated as the weighted mean of all post-randomization measurement, with weights representing the time elapsed since the previous measurement

    Measured: 30th month

  50. time-averaged proteinuria (TA-P) calculated as the weighted mean of all post-randomization measurement, with weights representing the time elapsed since the previous measurement in IgAN patients with active renal lesions

    time-averaged proteinuria (TA-P) calculated as the weighted mean of all post-randomization measurement, with weights representing the time elapsed since the previous measurement

    Measured: 36th month

  51. time-averaged proteinuria (TA-P) calculated as the weighted mean of all post-randomization measurement, with weights representing the time elapsed since the previous measurement in IgAN patients with chronic renal lesions

    time-averaged proteinuria (TA-P) calculated as the weighted mean of all post-randomization measurement, with weights representing the time elapsed since the previous measurement

    Measured: 6th month

  52. time-averaged proteinuria (TA-P) calculated as the weighted mean of all post-randomization measurement, with weights representing the time elapsed since the previous measurement in IgAN patients with chronic renal lesions

    time-averaged proteinuria (TA-P) calculated as the weighted mean of all post-randomization measurement, with weights representing the time elapsed since the previous measurement

    Measured: 12th month

  53. time-averaged proteinuria (TA-P) calculated as the weighted mean of all post-randomization measurement, with weights representing the time elapsed since the previous measurement in IgAN patients with chronic renal lesions

    time-averaged proteinuria (TA-P) calculated as the weighted mean of all post-randomization measurement, with weights representing the time elapsed since the previous measurement

    Measured: 18th month

  54. time-averaged proteinuria (TA-P) calculated as the weighted mean of all post-randomization measurement, with weights representing the time elapsed since the previous measurement in IgAN patients with chronic renal lesions

    time-averaged proteinuria (TA-P) calculated as the weighted mean of all post-randomization measurement, with weights representing the time elapsed since the previous measurement

    Measured: 24th month

  55. time-averaged proteinuria (TA-P) calculated as the weighted mean of all post-randomization measurement, with weights representing the time elapsed since the previous measurement in IgAN patients with chronic renal lesions

    time-averaged proteinuria (TA-P) calculated as the weighted mean of all post-randomization measurement, with weights representing the time elapsed since the previous measurement

    Measured: 30th month

  56. time-averaged proteinuria (TA-P) calculated as the weighted mean of all post-randomization measurement, with weights representing the time elapsed since the previous measurement in IgAN patients with chronic renal lesions

    time-averaged proteinuria (TA-P) calculated as the weighted mean of all post-randomization measurement, with weights representing the time elapsed since the previous measurement

    Measured: 36 th month

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted10 Dec 2020
  2. Study start1 May 2023
  3. Primary completion1 Jun 2026 (estimated)
  4. Study completion31 Dec 2028 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
After the enrolment the eligible biopsy-proven IgAN patients will be randomized, separately, in each trial in a 1 to 1 ratio via a web-based program generating random numbers. The allocation will be not blinded to the group of assignment.
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
878 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04662723
Sponsor's protocol ID
2
Acronym
CLIgAN
Status last verified
Mar 2025
First submitted
27 Nov 2020
Last updated
2 Apr 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: IPD will be shared with other partners

Publications

  • Schena FP, Nistor I. Epidemiology of IgA Nephropathy: A Global Perspective. Semin Nephrol. 2018 Sep;38(5):435-442. doi: 10.1016/j.semnephrol.2018.05.013.

    PubMed 30177015
  • Koyama A, Igarashi M, Kobayashi M. Natural history and risk factors for immunoglobulin A nephropathy in Japan. Research Group on Progressive Renal Diseases. Am J Kidney Dis. 1997 Apr;29(4):526-32. doi: 10.1016/s0272-6386(97)90333-4.

    PubMed 9100040
  • Manno C, Strippoli GF, D'Altri C, Torres D, Rossini M, Schena FP. A novel simpler histological classification for renal survival in IgA nephropathy: a retrospective study. Am J Kidney Dis. 2007 Jun;49(6):763-75. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2007.03.013.

    PubMed 17533019
  • Chapter 10: Immunoglobulin A nephropathy. Kidney Int Suppl (2011). 2012 Jun;2(2):209-217. doi: 10.1038/kisup.2012.23. No abstract available.

    PubMed 25018935
  • Schena FP, Anelli VW, Trotta J, Di Noia T, Manno C, Tripepi G, D'Arrigo G, Chesnaye NC, Russo ML, Stangou M, Papagianni A, Zoccali C, Tesar V, Coppo R; members of the VALIGA study. Development and testing of an artificial intelligence tool for predicting end-stage kidney disease in patients with immunoglobulin A nephropathy. Kidney Int. 2021 May;99(5):1179-1188. doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2020.07.046. Epub 2020 Sep 2.

    PubMed 32889014
  • Working Group of the International IgA Nephropathy Network and the Renal Pathology Society; Roberts IS, Cook HT, Troyanov S, Alpers CE, Amore A, Barratt J, Berthoux F, Bonsib S, Bruijn JA, Cattran DC, Coppo R, D'Agati V, D'Amico G, Emancipator S, Emma F, Feehally J, Ferrario F, Fervenza FC, Florquin S, Fogo A, Geddes CC, Groene HJ, Haas M, Herzenberg AM, Hill PA, Hogg RJ, Hsu SI, Jennette JC, Joh K, Julian BA, Kawamura T, Lai FM, Li LS, Li PK, Liu ZH, Mackinnon B, Mezzano S, Schena FP, Tomino Y, Walker PD, Wang H, Weening JJ, Yoshikawa N, Zhang H. The Oxford classification of IgA nephropathy: pathology definitions, correlations, and reproducibility. Kidney Int. 2009 Sep;76(5):546-56. doi: 10.1038/ki.2009.168. Epub 2009 Jul 1.

    PubMed 19571790
  • Working Group of the International IgA Nephropathy Network and the Renal Pathology Society; Cattran DC, Coppo R, Cook HT, Feehally J, Roberts IS, Troyanov S, Alpers CE, Amore A, Barratt J, Berthoux F, Bonsib S, Bruijn JA, D'Agati V, D'Amico G, Emancipator S, Emma F, Ferrario F, Fervenza FC, Florquin S, Fogo A, Geddes CC, Groene HJ, Haas M, Herzenberg AM, Hill PA, Hogg RJ, Hsu SI, Jennette JC, Joh K, Julian BA, Kawamura T, Lai FM, Leung CB, Li LS, Li PK, Liu ZH, Mackinnon B, Mezzano S, Schena FP, Tomino Y, Walker PD, Wang H, Weening JJ, Yoshikawa N, Zhang H. The Oxford classification of IgA nephropathy: rationale, clinicopathological correlations, and classification. Kidney Int. 2009 Sep;76(5):534-45. doi: 10.1038/ki.2009.243. Epub 2009 Jul 1.

    PubMed 19571791
  • Kang SH, Choi SR, Park HS, Lee JY, Sun IO, Hwang HS, Chung BH, Park CW, Yang CW, Kim YS, Choi YJ, Choi BS. The Oxford classification as a predictor of prognosis in patients with IgA nephropathy. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2012 Jan;27(1):252-8. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfr295. Epub 2011 May 23.

    PubMed 21606384
  • Rauen T, Eitner F, Fitzner C, Sommerer C, Zeier M, Otte B, Panzer U, Peters H, Benck U, Mertens PR, Kuhlmann U, Witzke O, Gross O, Vielhauer V, Mann JF, Hilgers RD, Floege J; STOP-IgAN Investigators. Intensive Supportive Care plus Immunosuppression in IgA Nephropathy. N Engl J Med. 2015 Dec 3;373(23):2225-36. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1415463.

    PubMed 26630142
  • Lv J, Zhang H, Wong MG, Jardine MJ, Hladunewich M, Jha V, Monaghan H, Zhao M, Barbour S, Reich H, Cattran D, Glassock R, Levin A, Wheeler D, Woodward M, Billot L, Chan TM, Liu ZH, Johnson DW, Cass A, Feehally J, Floege J, Remuzzi G, Wu Y, Agarwal R, Wang HY, Perkovic V; TESTING Study Group. Effect of Oral Methylprednisolone on Clinical Outcomes in Patients With IgA Nephropathy: The TESTING Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2017 Aug 1;318(5):432-442. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.9362.

    PubMed 28763548
  • Shen XH, Liang SS, Chen HM, Le WB, Jiang S, Zeng CH, Zhou ML, Zhang HT, Liu ZH. Reversal of active glomerular lesions after immunosuppressive therapy in patients with IgA nephropathy: a repeat-biopsy based observation. J Nephrol. 2015 Aug;28(4):441-9. doi: 10.1007/s40620-014-0165-x. Epub 2015 Jan 14.

    PubMed 25585823
  • Shi SF, Wang SX, Jiang L, Lv JC, Liu LJ, Chen YQ, Zhu SN, Liu G, Zou WZ, Zhang H, Wang HY. Pathologic predictors of renal outcome and therapeutic efficacy in IgA nephropathy: validation of the oxford classification. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2011 Sep;6(9):2175-84. doi: 10.2215/CJN.11521210. Epub 2011 Aug 18.

    PubMed 21852672
  • Lv J, Yang Y, Zhang H, Chen W, Pan X, Guo Z, Wang C, Li S, Zhang J, Zhang J, Liu L, Shi S, Wang S, Chen M, Cui Z, Chen N, Yu X, Zhao M, Wang H. Prediction of outcomes in crescentic IgA nephropathy in a multicenter cohort study. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2013 Dec;24(12):2118-25. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2012101017. Epub 2013 Sep 12.

    PubMed 24029421
  • Trimarchi H, Barratt J, Cattran DC, Cook HT, Coppo R, Haas M, Liu ZH, Roberts IS, Yuzawa Y, Zhang H, Feehally J; IgAN Classification Working Group of the International IgA Nephropathy Network and the Renal Pathology Society; Conference Participants. Oxford Classification of IgA nephropathy 2016: an update from the IgA Nephropathy Classification Working Group. Kidney Int. 2017 May;91(5):1014-1021. doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2017.02.003. Epub 2017 Mar 22.

    PubMed 28341274
  • Levey AS, Eckardt KU, Dorman NM, Christiansen SL, Hoorn EJ, Ingelfinger JR, Inker LA, Levin A, Mehrotra R, Palevsky PM, Perazella MA, Tong A, Allison SJ, Bockenhauer D, Briggs JP, Bromberg JS, Davenport A, Feldman HI, Fouque D, Gansevoort RT, Gill JS, Greene EL, Hemmelgarn BR, Kretzler M, Lambie M, Lane PH, Laycock J, Leventhal SE, Mittelman M, Morrissey P, Ostermann M, Rees L, Ronco P, Schaefer F, St Clair Russell J, Vinck C, Walsh SB, Weiner DE, Cheung M, Jadoul M, Winkelmayer WC. Nomenclature for kidney function and disease: report of a Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Consensus Conference. Kidney Int. 2020 Jun;97(6):1117-1129. doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2020.02.010. Epub 2020 Mar 9.

    PubMed 32409237

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 4 study testing Corticosteroid, Renin-angiotensin sytem blockers and Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor in people with Glomerulonephritis and Immunoglobulin A Nephropathy, run by Fondazione Schena at 2 sites in Italy.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 17 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 2 Apr 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 2 sites in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Francesco P Schena (3336771291 ext. 0039, paolo.schena@uniba.it), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

-Proteinuria reduction within 6 months in IgAN patients with active renal lesions (time frame: 6th month). The study lists 12 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04662723, which also lists 23 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 2 Apr 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in