MelanomaEarly Phase 1TilmanoceptNCT04663126
Feasibility of IV Tc-99m-tilmanocept for Imaging of M2-like TAMs in Metastatic Melanoma
A Early Phase 1 study testing Tc-99m tilmanocept in people with Melanoma, run by John O. Prior at 1 site in Switzerland.
Trial summary
This study in 20 patients is designed as a monocentric, open-label and uncontrolled, exploratory pilot study. Patients diagnosed with advanced melanoma (stage III-IV) and scheduled for anti-PD-1 immunotherapy will be recruited for this project. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Melanoma
- What is being tested?
- Tc-99m tilmanocept
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 5 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSwitzerland
- Study dates
- 1 Feb 2021to 19 Jun 2023
- Phase
- Early Phase 1
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Female and male
- Age ≥ 18
- Diagnosis of having advanced melanoma , stage III-IV
- Scheduled for clinically indicated anti-PD-1 immunotherapy
- Informed Consent as documented by signature
- FDG PET/CT within 4 weeks before screening
- Biopsy available
- Minimum 3 lesions detected in FDG PET/CT
Who cannot join
- Age under 18
- Ocular melanoma
- Women who are pregnant or breast feeding,
- Intention to become pregnant during the course of the study,
- Previous enrolment into the current study,
- Enrolment of the investigator, his/her family members, employees and other dependent persons,
Show all 11Show fewer
- Previous immunotherapy,
- History of any disease or relevant physical or psychiatric condition or abnormal physical finding which may interfere with the study objectives at the investigator judgment
- The subject has a known allergy to or has had an adverse reaction to dextran exposure
- Insufficient knowledge of project language, inability to give consent or to follow procedures
- The patient makes use of his/her "right not to know" and refuses to be informed about incidental findings
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Switzerland1 site
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois
Lausanne, Canton of Vaud, 1011
About this study
Official title: Pilot Study to Test the Feasibility of IV Injected Tc-99m-tilmanocept for Imaging of M2-like Tumour Associated Macrophages in Metastatic Melanoma
This study in 20 patients is designed as a monocentric, open-label and uncontrolled, exploratory pilot study. Patients diagnosed with advanced melanoma (stage III-IV) and scheduled for anti-PD-1 immunotherapy will be recruited for this project. Patients will receive IV 250 µg Tilmanocept, labelled with 370 MBq of Tc-99m (bolus injection) according to the Navidea's protocol in our GMP certified radiopharmaceutical unit, before the first cycle of clinically scheduled immunotherapy.
Scintigraphy images will be acquired dynamically from time of injection to +30 minutes. Quantitative SPECT/CT (xSPECT/CT, Siemens Symbia Intevo, Erlangen, Germany) imaging will be performed up to 1 hour p.i. to evaluate hyperaemia, and up to 3 hours p.i. to image and measure the CD206 receptor uptake. The data of the scans will be compared to immunohistochemistry results from biopsy staining for TAMs and M2-like TAMs and retrospectively with response to the immunotherapy to determine any correlation between M2-like TAMs and treatment response. For the planned retrospective comparison we will use the FDG - PET/CT data that is done after the immunotherapy as standard of care. We will analyse the lesion size and FDG - uptake in standard of care PET/CT of CD206+ and CD206 negative lesions in Tilmanocept SPECT/CT before and after immunotherapy to determine any correlation between CD206 related uptake and treatment response.
Read the detailed description
According to the Swiss Federal Statistical Office, cancer has been the leading cause of death in Switzerland for men aged between 45 and 84 and women aged between 25 and 84. Melanoma, represents the deadliest and most aggressive form of skin cancer. The incidence of melanoma is rising and in Switzerland it is the fourth most occurring malignancy. In the recent years many advances have been achieved in the treatment of disseminated disease, namely targeted and immunomodulatory treatments (checkpoint inhibitors), either as monotherapy or in combination. Immune checkpoint inhibitors, such as anti-PD-1 are standard of care for advanced melanoma.
However, despite all the success by checkpoint inhibitors, still many patients do not benefit from treatment. Therefore, several attempts have been made to investigate possible prediction of outcome to PD1/PD-L1 treatment. Scientific studies reported mutational load, neoantigens or PD1/PD-L1 expression and/or CD8 infiltrates in melanoma to be predictive for response. However, it has further been shown that also PD-L1 negative tumours respond to PD1/PD-L1 blockade. One possible explanation could be the heterogeneity of intra-tumoural PD-L1 expression or the heterogeneity among different tumour sites in melanoma patients. Overall, the PD-L1 expression is highly dependent on extrinsic factors, as for example hypoxia and therefore highly versatile at different sites and over time.
Another important mechanism of resistance lies in the tumour microenvironment, mainly in inhibitory immune cells of the host. Among others, such as regulatory t-cells (Tregs) or myeloid derived stem cells (MDSC), tumour associated macrophages (TAMs) seem of particular importance in the immune-modulation of the tumour microenvironment.
TAMs in the tumour microenvironment play an essential role in cancer progression. Particularly, the alternatively activated M2 polarized phenotype (M2-like) is confirmed as indicator of poor patients' outcome. During melanoma progression the anti-tumoural M1 polarized phenotype (M1-like) shifts towards the M2 phenotype, which can directly suppress immunity for example via production of cytokines as TGFb or IL-10, cooperating in the reduction of specific CD8 derived immune response. The evolution in understanding the macrophage compartment led therefore to the development of further treatment strategies as CSFR-1 directed antibodies, showing promising synergizing effects with PD-1 directed treatment and reversed resistance to checkpoint inhibitor treatment.
CD206, also termed as MRC1 (C-type mannose receptor 1), is an M2-like macrophage marker in both mouse and human. Its upregulation in macrophages renders them to produce IL-10 and TGFb, identifying this TAM population as anti-inflammatory subtype.
Tc-99m-tilmanocept is a FDA/EMA approved drug (Lymphoseek™, NAVIDEA Biopharmaceuticals, OH, USA). The radio-peptide targets CD206 with nano-molar affinities and is licensed for mapping and localization of lymph nodes draining breast cancer or melanoma using subcutaneous, intradermal, subareolar, or peritumoral injection. Studies have shown superiority to conventional sentinel node procedures. Technetium Tc-99m binds to the diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (DTPA) moieties of the Tilmanocept, making it a tracer, suitable for lymph node scintigraphy/SPECT/CT.
Furthermore, recent evidence establishes its role to detect systemic inflammation. Due to its high specificity, even small targets as atherosclerotic plaques in mice can be visualized. Most recent trials have investigated Tc-99m Tilmanocept as intravenous injection (IV) in patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis. A dosage of 150 µg Tilmanocept IV, labelled with 370 MBq of Tc-99m-has demonstrated to be safe and was specific in affected joints of all subjects who had undergone multiple RA flares, which demonstrates CD206+ macrophage infiltration of these joints. Several trials currently investigate the role of Tc-99m-tilmanocept IV and show promising results, for example in patients with Kaposi Sarcoma (NCT03157167) or in patients with liver metastases (NCT03029988).
This study aims to investigate the feasibility and efficacy of Tc-99m-tilmanocept as a marker for CD206+ M2-like TAMs in lesions in melanoma patients. The identification of a correlation of M2-like TAMs presence with the outcome of patients receiving anti-PD1 immunotherapy, would open up new ways to predict ICH treatment response. Therefore, we want to take the first step with this pilot study to evaluate the feasibility of Tc-99m-tilmanocept as a marker for imaging of M2-like TAMs in melanoma metastasis.
This Project falls under risk category C. Intravenous Injection had been tested in a Phase I dose escalation trial in subjects with active rheumatoid arthritis. Subjects received an IV injection of 50, 200 or 400µg Tilmanocept labelled with 37, 185 or 370 MBq of Tc-99m. This study reported that IV injection of Tc-99m-tilmanocept was well tolerated and no adverse drug reactions were observed in any group. Nevertheless, the approval for Tilmanocept does not include IV as route of administration. Therefore, the risk category is C.
There are no data available determining the risk for pregnant woman or the foetus. But, as for every nuclear medicine exam, pregnancy will be tested before any intervention and is part of the standard of care precaution. Pregnancy is an exclusion criterion.
Although no serious hypersensitivity reactions were reported in clinical trials with Tc-99m-tilmanocept, there might be a risk of such reaction due to its chemical similarity to dextran. Patients will be ask before administration about previous hypersensitivity reactions to dextran and modified forms of dextran. In case of emergency, standard emergency procedures will be employed.
There is no immediate benefit to the study participants. The results of the study might provide a better understanding of the diversity of responses to immunotherapy and might allow in future to predict the response of a melanoma patient to immunotherapy. This prediction could allow a more personalized treatment plan for future melanoma patients and could therefore also prevent unnecessary toxicity reactions caused by immunotherapy.
General study design This study in 20 patients is designed as a monocentric, open-label and uncontrolled, exploratory pilot study. Patients diagnosed with advanced melanoma (stage III-IV) and scheduled for anti-PD-1 immunotherapy will be recruited for this project. Patients will receive IV 250 µg Tilmanocept, labelled with 370 MBq of Tc-99m (bolus injection) according to the Navidea's protocol in our GMP certified radiopharmaceutical unit, before the first cycle of clinically scheduled immunotherapy.
Scintigraphy images will be acquired dynamically from time of injection to +30 minutes. Quantitative SPECT/CT (xSPECT/CT, Siemens Symbia Intevo, Erlangen, Germany) imaging will be performed up to 1 hour p.i. to evaluate hyperaemia, and up to 3 hours p.i. to image and measure the CD206 receptor uptake. The data of the scans will be compared to immunohistochemistry results from biopsy staining for TAMs and M2-like TAMs and retrospectively with response to the immunotherapy to determine any correlation between M2-like TAMs and treatment response. For the planned retrospective comparison we will use the FDG - PET/CT data that is done after the immunotherapy as standard of care. We will analyse the lesion size and FDG - uptake in standard of care PET/CT of CD206+ and CD206 negative lesions in Tilmanocept SPECT/CT before and after immunotherapy to determine any correlation between CD206 related uptake and treatment response.
- Conditions
- Melanoma
- Being tested
- Tc-99m tilmanocept
- Keywords
- Macrophages M2
- Medical subject headings
- Melanoma
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Tc-99m tilmanoceptDrug
Also called Lymphoseek
IV 250 µg Tilmanocept, labelled with 370 MBq of Tc-99m
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Treatment group | Experimental | Patients diagnosed with advanced melanoma (stage III-IV) will receive IV 250 µg Tilmanocept, labelled with 370 MBq of Tc-99m before the first cycle of clinically scheduled anti-PD-1 immunotherapy. Receives: Drug: Tc-99m tilmanocept |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Imaging results
The primary endpoint is the imaging result obtained by scintigraphy/SPECT at day 0 as lesion number and site, compared to standard of care clinical imaging (FDG - PET/CT) per lesion and per patient.
Measured: 3 hours post injection
Secondary outcomes (2)
Immunohistochemistry
Secondary endpoint will be the proportion of macrophages and the ratio of macrophage subtype (CD206 positive (M2-like) versus CD206 negative (M1-like)), obtained by immunohistochemistry in biopsies in correlation with Tc-99m-tilmanocept uptake.
Measured: 1 week after scan
Retrospective analysis
For retrospective analysis of correlation of M2-like TAM proportion and response to anti-PD1 immunotherapy we will compare the three most active lesions (uptake of Tc-99m-tilmanocept) in scintigraphy/SPECT images with SOC follow up imaging PET/CT (or if needed other anatomical imaging as MRI or contrast enhanced CT) in each patient.
Measured: 1 week after scan
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted10 Dec 2020
- Study start1 Feb 2021
- Primary completion8 Jan 2023
- Study completion19 Jun 2023
Why it stopped: after inclusion of 5 patients, tracer had low uptake (kidney/liver)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (33)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for MelanomaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Early Phase 1
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 5 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- John O. Prior
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, John O. Prior, University of Lausanne Hospitals
- Investigators
- Niklaus Schaefer, Prof., Principal investigator, CHUV Lausanne
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04663126
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Tilmanocept
- Acronym
- Tilmanocept
- Status last verified
- Dec 2023
- First submitted
- 30 Nov 2020
- Last updated
- 13 Dec 2023
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Domingues B, Lopes JM, Soares P, Populo H. Melanoma treatment in review. Immunotargets Ther. 2018 Jun 7;7:35-49. doi: 10.2147/ITT.S134842. eCollection 2018.
PubMed 29922629Hodi FS, O'Day SJ, McDermott DF, Weber RW, Sosman JA, Haanen JB, Gonzalez R, Robert C, Schadendorf D, Hassel JC, Akerley W, van den Eertwegh AJ, Lutzky J, Lorigan P, Vaubel JM, Linette GP, Hogg D, Ottensmeier CH, Lebbe C, Peschel C, Quirt I, Clark JI, Wolchok JD, Weber JS, Tian J, Yellin MJ, Nichol GM, Hoos A, Urba WJ. Improved survival with ipilimumab in patients with metastatic melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2010 Aug 19;363(8):711-23. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1003466. Epub 2010 Jun 5.
PubMed 20525992Robert C, Long GV, Brady B, Dutriaux C, Maio M, Mortier L, Hassel JC, Rutkowski P, McNeil C, Kalinka-Warzocha E, Savage KJ, Hernberg MM, Lebbe C, Charles J, Mihalcioiu C, Chiarion-Sileni V, Mauch C, Cognetti F, Arance A, Schmidt H, Schadendorf D, Gogas H, Lundgren-Eriksson L, Horak C, Sharkey B, Waxman IM, Atkinson V, Ascierto PA. Nivolumab in previously untreated melanoma without BRAF mutation. N Engl J Med. 2015 Jan 22;372(4):320-30. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1412082. Epub 2014 Nov 16.
PubMed 25399552Ribas A, Puzanov I, Dummer R, Schadendorf D, Hamid O, Robert C, Hodi FS, Schachter J, Pavlick AC, Lewis KD, Cranmer LD, Blank CU, O'Day SJ, Ascierto PA, Salama AK, Margolin KA, Loquai C, Eigentler TK, Gangadhar TC, Carlino MS, Agarwala SS, Moschos SJ, Sosman JA, Goldinger SM, Shapira-Frommer R, Gonzalez R, Kirkwood JM, Wolchok JD, Eggermont A, Li XN, Zhou W, Zernhelt AM, Lis J, Ebbinghaus S, Kang SP, Daud A. Pembrolizumab versus investigator-choice chemotherapy for ipilimumab-refractory melanoma (KEYNOTE-002): a randomised, controlled, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2015 Aug;16(8):908-18. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00083-2. Epub 2015 Jun 23.
PubMed 26115796Larkin J, Chiarion-Sileni V, Gonzalez R, Grob JJ, Cowey CL, Lao CD, Schadendorf D, Dummer R, Smylie M, Rutkowski P, Ferrucci PF, Hill A, Wagstaff J, Carlino MS, Haanen JB, Maio M, Marquez-Rodas I, McArthur GA, Ascierto PA, Long GV, Callahan MK, Postow MA, Grossmann K, Sznol M, Dreno B, Bastholt L, Yang A, Rollin LM, Horak C, Hodi FS, Wolchok JD. Combined Nivolumab and Ipilimumab or Monotherapy in Untreated Melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2015 Jul 2;373(1):23-34. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1504030. Epub 2015 May 31.
PubMed 26027431Snyder A, Makarov V, Merghoub T, Yuan J, Zaretsky JM, Desrichard A, Walsh LA, Postow MA, Wong P, Ho TS, Hollmann TJ, Bruggeman C, Kannan K, Li Y, Elipenahli C, Liu C, Harbison CT, Wang L, Ribas A, Wolchok JD, Chan TA. Genetic basis for clinical response to CTLA-4 blockade in melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2014 Dec 4;371(23):2189-2199. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1406498. Epub 2014 Nov 19.
PubMed 25409260McGranahan N, Furness AJ, Rosenthal R, Ramskov S, Lyngaa R, Saini SK, Jamal-Hanjani M, Wilson GA, Birkbak NJ, Hiley CT, Watkins TB, Shafi S, Murugaesu N, Mitter R, Akarca AU, Linares J, Marafioti T, Henry JY, Van Allen EM, Miao D, Schilling B, Schadendorf D, Garraway LA, Makarov V, Rizvi NA, Snyder A, Hellmann MD, Merghoub T, Wolchok JD, Shukla SA, Wu CJ, Peggs KS, Chan TA, Hadrup SR, Quezada SA, Swanton C. Clonal neoantigens elicit T cell immunoreactivity and sensitivity to immune checkpoint blockade. Science. 2016 Mar 25;351(6280):1463-9. doi: 10.1126/science.aaf1490. Epub 2016 Mar 3.
PubMed 26940869Tumeh PC, Harview CL, Yearley JH, Shintaku IP, Taylor EJ, Robert L, Chmielowski B, Spasic M, Henry G, Ciobanu V, West AN, Carmona M, Kivork C, Seja E, Cherry G, Gutierrez AJ, Grogan TR, Mateus C, Tomasic G, Glaspy JA, Emerson RO, Robins H, Pierce RH, Elashoff DA, Robert C, Ribas A. PD-1 blockade induces responses by inhibiting adaptive immune resistance. Nature. 2014 Nov 27;515(7528):568-71. doi: 10.1038/nature13954.
PubMed 25428505Sznol M, Chen L. Antagonist antibodies to PD-1 and B7-H1 (PD-L1) in the treatment of advanced human cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2013 Mar 1;19(5):1021-34. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-12-2063.
PubMed 23460533Wolchok JD, Kluger H, Callahan MK, Postow MA, Rizvi NA, Lesokhin AM, Segal NH, Ariyan CE, Gordon RA, Reed K, Burke MM, Caldwell A, Kronenberg SA, Agunwamba BU, Zhang X, Lowy I, Inzunza HD, Feely W, Horak CE, Hong Q, Korman AJ, Wigginton JM, Gupta A, Sznol M. Nivolumab plus ipilimumab in advanced melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2013 Jul 11;369(2):122-33. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1302369. Epub 2013 Jun 2.
PubMed 23724867Obeid JM, Erdag G, Smolkin ME, Deacon DH, Patterson JW, Chen L, Bullock TN, Slingluff CL. PD-L1, PD-L2 and PD-1 expression in metastatic melanoma: Correlation with tumor-infiltrating immune cells and clinical outcome. Oncoimmunology. 2016 Sep 20;5(11):e1235107. doi: 10.1080/2162402X.2016.1235107. eCollection 2016.
PubMed 27999753Madore J, Vilain RE, Menzies AM, Kakavand H, Wilmott JS, Hyman J, Yearley JH, Kefford RF, Thompson JF, Long GV, Hersey P, Scolyer RA. PD-L1 expression in melanoma shows marked heterogeneity within and between patients: implications for anti-PD-1/PD-L1 clinical trials. Pigment Cell Melanoma Res. 2015 May;28(3):245-53. doi: 10.1111/pcmr.12340. Epub 2014 Dec 22.
PubMed 25477049Barsoum IB, Smallwood CA, Siemens DR, Graham CH. A mechanism of hypoxia-mediated escape from adaptive immunity in cancer cells. Cancer Res. 2014 Feb 1;74(3):665-74. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-13-0992. Epub 2013 Dec 13.
PubMed 24336068Sharma P, Hu-Lieskovan S, Wargo JA, Ribas A. Primary, Adaptive, and Acquired Resistance to Cancer Immunotherapy. Cell. 2017 Feb 9;168(4):707-723. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2017.01.017.
PubMed 28187290Siveen KS, Kuttan G. Role of macrophages in tumour progression. Immunol Lett. 2009 Apr 27;123(2):97-102. doi: 10.1016/j.imlet.2009.02.011. Epub 2009 Mar 9.
PubMed 19428556
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 13 Dec 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Pilot Study to Test the Feasibility of IV Injected Tc-99m-tilmanocept for Imaging of M2-like Tumour Associated Macrophages in Metastatic Melanoma
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04663126
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Tilmanocept / Tilmanocept
- Conditions
- Melanoma
- Keywords
- Macrophages M2
- Phase
- Early Phase 1
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: after inclusion of 5 patients, tracer had low uptake (kidney/liver)
- Enrolment
- 5 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- John O. PriorUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Feb 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 8 Jan 2023 (actual)
- Study completion
- 19 Jun 2023 (actual)
- First posted
- 10 Dec 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study in 20 patients is designed as a monocentric, open-label and uncontrolled, exploratory pilot study. Patients diagnosed with advanced melanoma (stage III-IV) and scheduled for anti-PD-1 immunotherapy will be recruited for this project. Patients will receive IV 250 µg Tilmanocept, labelled with 370 MBq of Tc-99m (bolus injection) according to the Navidea's protocol in our GMP certified radiopharmaceutical unit, before the first cycle of clinically scheduled immunotherapy.
Scintigraphy images will be acquired dynamically from time of injection to +30 minutes. Quantitative SPECT/CT (xSPECT/CT, Siemens Symbia Intevo, Erlangen, Germany) imaging will be performed up to 1 hour p.i. to evaluate hyperaemia, and up to 3 hours p.i. to image and measure the CD206 receptor uptake. The data of the scans will be compared to immunohistochemistry results from biopsy staining for TAMs and M2-like TAMs and retrospectively with response to the immunotherapy to determine any correlation between M2-like TAMs and treatment response. For the planned retrospective comparison we will use the FDG - PET/CT data that is done after the immunotherapy as standard of care. We will analyse the lesion size and FDG - uptake in standard of care PET/CT of CD206+ and CD206 negative lesions in Tilmanocept SPECT/CT before and after immunotherapy to determine any correlation between CD206 related uptake and treatment response.
Detailed description
According to the Swiss Federal Statistical Office, cancer has been the leading cause of death in Switzerland for men aged between 45 and 84 and women aged between 25 and 84. Melanoma, represents the deadliest and most aggressive form of skin cancer. The incidence of melanoma is rising and in Switzerland it is the fourth most occurring malignancy. In the recent years many advances have been achieved in the treatment of disseminated disease, namely targeted and immunomodulatory treatments (checkpoint inhibitors), either as monotherapy or in combination. Immune checkpoint inhibitors, such as anti-PD-1 are standard of care for advanced melanoma.
However, despite all the success by checkpoint inhibitors, still many patients do not benefit from treatment. Therefore, several attempts have been made to investigate possible prediction of outcome to PD1/PD-L1 treatment. Scientific studies reported mutational load, neoantigens or PD1/PD-L1 expression and/or CD8 infiltrates in melanoma to be predictive for response. However, it has further been shown that also PD-L1 negative tumours respond to PD1/PD-L1 blockade. One possible explanation could be the heterogeneity of intra-tumoural PD-L1 expression or the heterogeneity among different tumour sites in melanoma patients. Overall, the PD-L1 expression is highly dependent on extrinsic factors, as for example hypoxia and therefore highly versatile at different sites and over time.
Another important mechanism of resistance lies in the tumour microenvironment, mainly in inhibitory immune cells of the host. Among others, such as regulatory t-cells (Tregs) or myeloid derived stem cells (MDSC), tumour associated macrophages (TAMs) seem of particular importance in the immune-modulation of the tumour microenvironment.
TAMs in the tumour microenvironment play an essential role in cancer progression. Particularly, the alternatively activated M2 polarized phenotype (M2-like) is confirmed as indicator of poor patients' outcome. During melanoma progression the anti-tumoural M1 polarized phenotype (M1-like) shifts towards the M2 phenotype, which can directly suppress immunity for example via production of cytokines as TGFb or IL-10, cooperating in the reduction of specific CD8 derived immune response. The evolution in understanding the macrophage compartment led therefore to the development of further treatment strategies as CSFR-1 directed antibodies, showing promising synergizing effects with PD-1 directed treatment and reversed resistance to checkpoint inhibitor treatment.
CD206, also termed as MRC1 (C-type mannose receptor 1), is an M2-like macrophage marker in both mouse and human. Its upregulation in macrophages renders them to produce IL-10 and TGFb, identifying this TAM population as anti-inflammatory subtype.
Tc-99m-tilmanocept is a FDA/EMA approved drug (Lymphoseek™, NAVIDEA Biopharmaceuticals, OH, USA). The radio-peptide targets CD206 with nano-molar affinities and is licensed for mapping and localization of lymph nodes draining breast cancer or melanoma using subcutaneous, intradermal, subareolar, or peritumoral injection. Studies have shown superiority to conventional sentinel node procedures. Technetium Tc-99m binds to the diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (DTPA) moieties of the Tilmanocept, making it a tracer, suitable for lymph node scintigraphy/SPECT/CT.
Furthermore, recent evidence establishes its role to detect systemic inflammation. Due to its high specificity, even small targets as atherosclerotic plaques in mice can be visualized. Most recent trials have investigated Tc-99m Tilmanocept as intravenous injection (IV) in patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis. A dosage of 150 µg Tilmanocept IV, labelled with 370 MBq of Tc-99m-has demonstrated to be safe and was specific in affected joints of all subjects who had undergone multiple RA flares, which demonstrates CD206+ macrophage infiltration of these joints. Several trials currently investigate the role of Tc-99m-tilmanocept IV and show promising results, for example in patients with Kaposi Sarcoma (NCT03157167) or in patients with liver metastases (NCT03029988).
This study aims to investigate the feasibility and efficacy of Tc-99m-tilmanocept as a marker for CD206+ M2-like TAMs in lesions in melanoma patients. The identification of a correlation of M2-like TAMs presence with the outcome of patients receiving anti-PD1 immunotherapy, would open up new ways to predict ICH treatment response. Therefore, we want to take the first step with this pilot study to evaluate the feasibility of Tc-99m-tilmanocept as a marker for imaging of M2-like TAMs in melanoma metastasis.
This Project falls under risk category C. Intravenous Injection had been tested in a Phase I dose escalation trial in subjects with active rheumatoid arthritis. Subjects received an IV injection of 50, 200 or 400µg Tilmanocept labelled with 37, 185 or 370 MBq of Tc-99m. This study reported that IV injection of Tc-99m-tilmanocept was well tolerated and no adverse drug reactions were observed in any group. Nevertheless, the approval for Tilmanocept does not include IV as route of administration. Therefore, the risk category is C.
There are no data available determining the risk for pregnant woman or the foetus. But, as for every nuclear medicine exam, pregnancy will be tested before any intervention and is part of the standard of care precaution. Pregnancy is an exclusion criterion.
Although no serious hypersensitivity reactions were reported in clinical trials with Tc-99m-tilmanocept, there might be a risk of such reaction due to its chemical similarity to dextran. Patients will be ask before administration about previous hypersensitivity reactions to dextran and modified forms of dextran. In case of emergency, standard emergency procedures will be employed.
There is no immediate benefit to the study participants. The results of the study might provide a better understanding of the diversity of responses to immunotherapy and might allow in future to predict the response of a melanoma patient to immunotherapy. This prediction could allow a more personalized treatment plan for future melanoma patients and could therefore also prevent unnecessary toxicity reactions caused by immunotherapy.
General study design This study in 20 patients is designed as a monocentric, open-label and uncontrolled, exploratory pilot study. Patients diagnosed with advanced melanoma (stage III-IV) and scheduled for anti-PD-1 immunotherapy will be recruited for this project. Patients will receive IV 250 µg Tilmanocept, labelled with 370 MBq of Tc-99m (bolus injection) according to the Navidea's protocol in our GMP certified radiopharmaceutical unit, before the first cycle of clinically scheduled immunotherapy.
Scintigraphy images will be acquired dynamically from time of injection to +30 minutes. Quantitative SPECT/CT (xSPECT/CT, Siemens Symbia Intevo, Erlangen, Germany) imaging will be performed up to 1 hour p.i. to evaluate hyperaemia, and up to 3 hours p.i. to image and measure the CD206 receptor uptake. The data of the scans will be compared to immunohistochemistry results from biopsy staining for TAMs and M2-like TAMs and retrospectively with response to the immunotherapy to determine any correlation between M2-like TAMs and treatment response. For the planned retrospective comparison we will use the FDG - PET/CT data that is done after the immunotherapy as standard of care. We will analyse the lesion size and FDG - uptake in standard of care PET/CT of CD206+ and CD206 negative lesions in Tilmanocept SPECT/CT before and after immunotherapy to determine any correlation between CD206 related uptake and treatment response.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Treatment group | Experimental | Drug: Tc-99m tilmanoceptPatients diagnosed with advanced melanoma (stage III-IV) will receive IV 250 µg Tilmanocept, labelled with 370 MBq of Tc-99m before the first cycle of clinically scheduled anti-PD-1 immunotherapy. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Female and male
- Age ≥ 18
- Diagnosis of having advanced melanoma , stage III-IV
- Scheduled for clinically indicated anti-PD-1 immunotherapy
- Informed Consent as documented by signature
Key exclusion criteria (11 listed)
- Age under 18
- Ocular melanoma
- Women who are pregnant or breast feeding,
- Intention to become pregnant during the course of the study,
- Previous enrolment into the current study,
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Tc-99m tilmanoceptAlso: LymphoseekIV 250 µg Tilmanocept, labelled with 370 MBq of Tc-99m | Drug | Treatment group |
Primary outcome
Imaging results
Time frame: 3 hours post injection
The primary endpoint is the imaging result obtained by scintigraphy/SPECT at day 0 as lesion number and site, compared to standard of care clinical imaging (FDG - PET/CT) per lesion and per patient.
2 secondary outcomes
Immunohistochemistry
Time frame: 1 week after scan
Retrospective analysis
Time frame: 1 week after scan
Results and safety
The study was stopped early (reason given: after inclusion of 5 patients, tracer had low uptake (kidney/liver)). Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 13 Dec 2023.
- Background: PubMed 29922629Domingues B, Lopes JM, Soares P, Populo H. Melanoma treatment in review. Immunotargets Ther. 2018 Jun 7;7:35-49. doi: 10.2147/ITT.S134842. eCollection 2018.
- Background: PubMed 20525992Hodi FS, O'Day SJ, McDermott DF, Weber RW, Sosman JA, Haanen JB, Gonzalez R, Robert C, Schadendorf D, Hassel JC, Akerley W, van den Eertwegh AJ, Lutzky J, Lorigan P, Vaubel JM, Linette GP, Hogg D, Ottensmeier CH, Lebbe C, Peschel C, Quirt I, Clark JI, Wolchok JD, Weber JS, Tian J, Yellin MJ, Nichol GM, Hoos A, Urba WJ. Improved survival with ipilimumab in patients with metastatic melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2010 Aug 19;363(8):711-23. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1003466. Epub 2010 Jun 5.
- Background: PubMed 25399552Robert C, Long GV, Brady B, Dutriaux C, Maio M, Mortier L, Hassel JC, Rutkowski P, McNeil C, Kalinka-Warzocha E, Savage KJ, Hernberg MM, Lebbe C, Charles J, Mihalcioiu C, Chiarion-Sileni V, Mauch C, Cognetti F, Arance A, Schmidt H, Schadendorf D, Gogas H, Lundgren-Eriksson L, Horak C, Sharkey B, Waxman IM, Atkinson V, Ascierto PA. Nivolumab in previously untreated melanoma without BRAF mutation. N Engl J Med. 2015 Jan 22;372(4):320-30. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1412082. Epub 2014 Nov 16.
- Background: PubMed 26115796Ribas A, Puzanov I, Dummer R, Schadendorf D, Hamid O, Robert C, Hodi FS, Schachter J, Pavlick AC, Lewis KD, Cranmer LD, Blank CU, O'Day SJ, Ascierto PA, Salama AK, Margolin KA, Loquai C, Eigentler TK, Gangadhar TC, Carlino MS, Agarwala SS, Moschos SJ, Sosman JA, Goldinger SM, Shapira-Frommer R, Gonzalez R, Kirkwood JM, Wolchok JD, Eggermont A, Li XN, Zhou W, Zernhelt AM, Lis J, Ebbinghaus S, Kang SP, Daud A. Pembrolizumab versus investigator-choice chemotherapy for ipilimumab-refractory melanoma (KEYNOTE-002): a randomised, controlled, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2015 Aug;16(8):908-18. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00083-2. Epub 2015 Jun 23.
- Background: PubMed 26027431Larkin J, Chiarion-Sileni V, Gonzalez R, Grob JJ, Cowey CL, Lao CD, Schadendorf D, Dummer R, Smylie M, Rutkowski P, Ferrucci PF, Hill A, Wagstaff J, Carlino MS, Haanen JB, Maio M, Marquez-Rodas I, McArthur GA, Ascierto PA, Long GV, Callahan MK, Postow MA, Grossmann K, Sznol M, Dreno B, Bastholt L, Yang A, Rollin LM, Horak C, Hodi FS, Wolchok JD. Combined Nivolumab and Ipilimumab or Monotherapy in Untreated Melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2015 Jul 2;373(1):23-34. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1504030. Epub 2015 May 31.
- Background: PubMed 25409260Snyder A, Makarov V, Merghoub T, Yuan J, Zaretsky JM, Desrichard A, Walsh LA, Postow MA, Wong P, Ho TS, Hollmann TJ, Bruggeman C, Kannan K, Li Y, Elipenahli C, Liu C, Harbison CT, Wang L, Ribas A, Wolchok JD, Chan TA. Genetic basis for clinical response to CTLA-4 blockade in melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2014 Dec 4;371(23):2189-2199. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1406498. Epub 2014 Nov 19.
- Background: PubMed 26940869McGranahan N, Furness AJ, Rosenthal R, Ramskov S, Lyngaa R, Saini SK, Jamal-Hanjani M, Wilson GA, Birkbak NJ, Hiley CT, Watkins TB, Shafi S, Murugaesu N, Mitter R, Akarca AU, Linares J, Marafioti T, Henry JY, Van Allen EM, Miao D, Schilling B, Schadendorf D, Garraway LA, Makarov V, Rizvi NA, Snyder A, Hellmann MD, Merghoub T, Wolchok JD, Shukla SA, Wu CJ, Peggs KS, Chan TA, Hadrup SR, Quezada SA, Swanton C. Clonal neoantigens elicit T cell immunoreactivity and sensitivity to immune checkpoint blockade. Science. 2016 Mar 25;351(6280):1463-9. doi: 10.1126/science.aaf1490. Epub 2016 Mar 3.
- Background: PubMed 25428505Tumeh PC, Harview CL, Yearley JH, Shintaku IP, Taylor EJ, Robert L, Chmielowski B, Spasic M, Henry G, Ciobanu V, West AN, Carmona M, Kivork C, Seja E, Cherry G, Gutierrez AJ, Grogan TR, Mateus C, Tomasic G, Glaspy JA, Emerson RO, Robins H, Pierce RH, Elashoff DA, Robert C, Ribas A. PD-1 blockade induces responses by inhibiting adaptive immune resistance. Nature. 2014 Nov 27;515(7528):568-71. doi: 10.1038/nature13954.
- Background: PubMed 23460533Sznol M, Chen L. Antagonist antibodies to PD-1 and B7-H1 (PD-L1) in the treatment of advanced human cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2013 Mar 1;19(5):1021-34. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-12-2063.
- Background: PubMed 23724867Wolchok JD, Kluger H, Callahan MK, Postow MA, Rizvi NA, Lesokhin AM, Segal NH, Ariyan CE, Gordon RA, Reed K, Burke MM, Caldwell A, Kronenberg SA, Agunwamba BU, Zhang X, Lowy I, Inzunza HD, Feely W, Horak CE, Hong Q, Korman AJ, Wigginton JM, Gupta A, Sznol M. Nivolumab plus ipilimumab in advanced melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2013 Jul 11;369(2):122-33. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1302369. Epub 2013 Jun 2.
- Background: PubMed 27999753Obeid JM, Erdag G, Smolkin ME, Deacon DH, Patterson JW, Chen L, Bullock TN, Slingluff CL. PD-L1, PD-L2 and PD-1 expression in metastatic melanoma: Correlation with tumor-infiltrating immune cells and clinical outcome. Oncoimmunology. 2016 Sep 20;5(11):e1235107. doi: 10.1080/2162402X.2016.1235107. eCollection 2016.
- Background: PubMed 25477049Madore J, Vilain RE, Menzies AM, Kakavand H, Wilmott JS, Hyman J, Yearley JH, Kefford RF, Thompson JF, Long GV, Hersey P, Scolyer RA. PD-L1 expression in melanoma shows marked heterogeneity within and between patients: implications for anti-PD-1/PD-L1 clinical trials. Pigment Cell Melanoma Res. 2015 May;28(3):245-53. doi: 10.1111/pcmr.12340. Epub 2014 Dec 22.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Melanoma
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Study of INBRX-106 and INBRX-106 in Combination With Pembrolizumab (Keytruda®) in Subjects With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors (Hexavalent OX40 Agonist)
Solid Tumor, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
RecruitingPhase 1
IL-17 Blockade to Decrease irAEs (REPLAY)
Metastatic Melanoma
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Natural History Study of Early Life Exposures in Agriculture (ELEA)
Prostate Cancer, Leukemia
RecruitingPhase 1
A Feasibility Study Utilizing Immune Recall to Increase Response to Checkpoint Therapy
Melanoma
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
A Study of Dapansutrile Plus Pembrolizumab in Patients With PD-1 Refractory Advanced Melanoma
Melanoma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Niklaus Schaefer, Prof. principal investigator
CHUV Lausanne
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Early Phase 1 study testing Tc-99m tilmanocept in people with Melanoma, run by John O. Prior at 1 site in Switzerland.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Dec 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Switzerland. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Early Phase 1 (sometimes called Phase 0) studies give a very small amount of a treatment to a few people, mainly to see how the body handles it.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study was stopped early (reason given: after inclusion of 5 patients, tracer had low uptake (kidney/liver)). Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Imaging results (time frame: 3 hours post injection). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04663126, which also lists 33 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Dec 2023.