Central Neuropathic PainNCT04665492
EEG Predictors of Neuropathic Pain in SCI
An observational study of Central Neuropathic Pain and Spinal Cord Injuries, run by NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde at 2 sites in United Kingdom.
Trial summary
Spinal cord injury (SCI), induced by damage to the spinal cord, can cause life-altering levels of disability including the development of chronic pain. Central Neuropathic Pain (CNP) typically develops within months after injury in 40-50% of SCI patients, affecting everyday activity, sleep and mood. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Central Neuropathic Pain, Spinal Cord Injuries
- What is being tested?
- EEG recording 1, EEG recording 2 and Sensory Test
- How many people
- 80 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesUnited Kingdom
- Study dates
- 15 Jan 2021to 1 Apr 2023
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- All sexes
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Able bodied people and people with subacute spinal cord injury
Who may be able to join
- Inclusion criteria for patients with SCI and NO chronic pain are as follows:
- Age between 18-80
- Subacute spinal cord injury (within 6 months post injury)
- Level C3-T12
- ASIA A, B, C or D
- Normal or corrected to normal vision
Show all 20Show fewer
- No allodynia or hyperalgesia
- Inclusion criteria for patients with SCI and CNP are as follows:
- Age between 18-80
- Subacute spinal cord injury (within 6 months of injury)
- Level C3-T12
- ASIA A, B, C or D
- Normal or corrected to normal vision
- Presence of allodynia or hyperalgesia
- Diagnosed CNP related to SCI equal or larger than 4 on visual numerical scale (VNS)
- Age 18-80
- No self-reported neurological conditions
- No chronic or acute pain equal or larger than 3 on VNS
- Normal or corrected to normal vision
- English speaker
Who cannot join
- Inability to understand the task
- Inability to sit for at least 2 hours (duration of EEG assessment)
- Invasive 24/7 ventilation
- Previously confirmed brain injury, (peripheral nerve injury and brachial plexus injury)
- Other self-reported neurological condition that would affect EEG recording
- Presence/history of any other chronic or acute pain (larger or equal to 3 on the VNS)
Show all 17Show fewer
- Pressure sores or any other condition that might prevent sitting for 2 hours
- Halos or neck support that prevent EEG recording
- Infections of the skin or communicable diseases (e.g. hospital bugs)
- Concurrent acute medical problems (e.g. infections)
- Infection control issues i.e. the need for patient isolation
- Do not understand English
- Able bodied people and people who had spinal cord injury and are still in subacute phase (6 monthExclusion Criteria for able-bodied participants:
- Unable to give informed consent
- Presence of chronic or acute pain equal to or larger than 3 on VNS
- Any self-reported neurological conditions
- Non-English Speaker s post injury)
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country.
United Kingdom2 sites
Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Queen Elizabeth National Spinal Injurie Unit
Glasgow, G514TF
Mariel Purcell, MBChB BAO, 01412012536, Margaret.Purcell@ggc.scot.nhs.uk
Aleksandra Vuckovic, PhD Biomed Eng, 10412327884, aleksandra.vuckovic@glasgow.ac.uk
Stoke Mandevill Hospital, National Spinal Injuries Unit
Stoke Mandeville, Buckinghamshire, HP218AL
Maurizo Belci, MBChB BA, 01296315856, maurizio.belci@nhs.net
Keri Anderson, MEng Biomed Eng
About this study
Official title: Electroencephalographic Predictors of Central Neuropathic Pain in Subacute Spinal Cord Injury
Spinal cord injury (SCI), induced by damage to the spinal cord, can cause life-altering levels of disability including the development of chronic pain. Central Neuropathic Pain (CNP) typically develops within months after injury in 40-50% of SCI patients, affecting everyday activity, sleep and mood. There is no cure for CNP, it can be very difficult to treat and is often refractory to any pharmacological treatments.
In a previous study (study no. 14/WS/1029) the principle investigators showed that the likelihood of CNP developing can be predicted by defining characteristics of brain waves that are related to pain. We will use electroencephalograph (EEG) to measure brain activity in people early after SCI, before they develop pain, knowing that about half will develop pain within a year. We aim to recruit 80 participants, aged 18-80; 40 with subacute spinal injury (level C3-T12) and no symptoms of CNP; 20 with symptoms of CNP and 20 able-bodied participants. Completeness of injury is irrelevant. Patients will be recruited by clinical consultants within national spinal units in Glasgow and Stoke Mandeville. Patients will undergo two EEG recording sessions in which they will imagine movements while we record EEG. Sessions will also involve basic sensory testing and completion of questionnaires. Able-bodied participants will be recruited by the Philosophy Doctor (PhD) candidate at the University of Glasgow and undergo only one EEG session (identical to SCI patients).
The primary aim of this study is to use early EEG markers of CNP to optimise and validate an existing computer program based on machine learning to enable more accurate prediction of pain in newly injured patients with the hope of aiding future treatments. Secondary aims include characterising EEG features which might describe different phases in patients' development of CNP and exploring possible differences between pain at/below the level of SCI based on EEG markers.
Read the detailed description
Study Design The proposed study will be a longitudinal cohort study in which participants will attend one assessment session as inpatients in the subacute stage and a further assessment six months later, during which time patients are likely to be outpatients. Each session will last up to two hours and questionnaires may be completed within the hospital or outside. To minimise the drop-out, patients will be followed-up though their regular visits to the Queen Elizabeth National Spinal Injuries Uni (QENSIU) or Stoke Mandeville National Spinal Injuries Centre (NSIC) to categorise occurrence of pain, based on the recommended criteria for CNP and the International Spinal Cord Injury Pain Classification System. For those unable to attend the follow-up session, Co-Investigators will take information from their patient notes about their pain, allodynia and hyperalgesia in order to ensure that pain status is collected twice for all participants.
The study will be carried out on 20 able bodied and 60 subacute SCI patients, 40 with no CNP, and 20 with CNP (refer to section 8 for group size considerations). All patients will attend two recording sessions, 2 hours in length, during which time they will undergo EEG recordings as well as sensory testing (including mechanical and thermal tests). This is based on protocol used with the previous cohort. The first test will be carried out as soon as the patients' health condition allows them to sit for the duration of the experiment (this could be within first 3-6 months post injury as Stoke Mandeville Natioanl Spinal Injury Centre (NSIC) does not admit any early injury patients) and the second assessment will take place approximately 6 months later. Able-bodied participants will attend only one session.
Recruitment QENSIU admits around 110 new patients annually whilst Stoke Mandeville Hospital admits around 200. This gives 600 potential volunteers over a 2 year period which should be sufficient to recruit the targeted number. It is planned to recruit approximately half of participants (around 30 people with SCI) from each centre.
Patients will be identified and approached by their clinical consultants (Co-Investigators Dr Mariel Purcell and Dr Maurizio Belci). Prior to participating, patients will be given information sheets and consent forms to sign and should the participant themselves be unable to physically sign, a witnessed proxy can do so on the patient's behalf.
Able bodied participants will be recruited by advertising the study at the University of Glasgow and their data will be collected within the University of Glasgow Rehabilitation Engineering laboratory on University Campus. They will be recruited by the PhD student.
Assessments The patient participants will attend one assessment session as inpatients in the subacute stage and a further assessment six months later. Experimental and data collection procedures will be identical in both the first and second assessments undertaken by patients. This includes EEG recordings, sensory testing and questionnaires. Able bodied participants will only attend one assessment.
Experimental Procedures Questionnaires During assessment sessions, all patients will be asked to complete questionnaires which will allow us collect data on the status of their pain at the time of each visit.
The following questionnaires will be given to patients who at the time of assessment experience CNP:
- Brief Pain Inventory
- McGill pain questionnaire
- Neuropathic Pain Symptoms Inventory
- Multidimensional health locus of control (referring to spinal cord injury as "condition")
- Pain catastrophising scale (referring to the existing pain)
Patients who at the time of first assessment already had pain will be asked to repeat only first two questionnaires on the second assessment, after 6 months. It takes approximately 30 min to fill out all 5 questionnaires. Patients can fill out questionnaires at their own time. Outpatients (second assessment) will receive questionnaires and an envelope with a stamp to post it, or they could alternatively take scan/photos of questionnaires and send them to research team.
Patients with no pain will be asked to complete:
- Brief Pain Inventory
- Multidimensional health locus of control (referring to spinal cord injury as "condition")
Able bodied participants will be asked to fill out the Brief Pain Inventory. All patients with CNP will be diagnosed prior to the study as part of their regular treatment at the hospital. The diagnosis is based on recommendations by the International Spinal Cord Association.
Equipment All equipment has necessary medical device Certificate Europe (CE) mark. Both spinal units (QENSIU and NSIC) and University facilities (for able-bodied assessments) have the same equipment.
Sensory Tests We will use existing clinical American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) testing information to assess the level and completes of injury i.e. we will gain this information from patient notes following assessment performed by healthcare professional.
All patients will be tested for mechanical and thermal sensations at the foot and shin of both legs and on the trapezoidal muscle on both sides. These are recommended sensory sites from the literature for the following reasons: the feet and shanks are under the level of injury in both tetra and paraplegic patients and are typically reported as locations where most patients with SCI CNP report pain. Trapezoidal muscles are above the level of injury for all patients. Testing only 3 sites on both sides should minimise total assessment time and reduce patients' inconvenience.
Sensory mechanical assessments will comprise a determination of light touch and pinprick which will also serve as a sign of allodynia and hyperalgesia. A mechanical wind up test (with monofilament no. 6.65) will be performed and sensory thermal tests will be conducted using a device named "Rolltemp" (manufacturer "Somedic SenseLab" ). This device consists of two rollers on handles, one roller being warm and the other cold. These are rolled over the skin of the patients who are able to determine the corresponding sensations. Sensory testing will take 30-40 min.
Able bodied participants will not undergo sensory tests.
EEG Recording EEG will be recorded from 64 locations over the entire scalp according to the American Clinical Neurophysiology Society's 10-10 system. EEG will be recorded with a g.Tech biosignal USB amplifier (Guger Technologies, Austria) which enables on-line EEG measurement, signal analysis and visualisation of EEG signals on a computer screen.
Markers of longstanding CNP are present in both spontaneous and induced states such as during motor imagination. As such, EEG activity will first be recorded in the relaxed state of all patients with eyes open and eyes closed (spontaneous EEG), followed by EEG recording during cue-based motor imagination as done previously with the original cohort. This study showed that the presence of CNP affects cortical areas of both paralysed and non-paralysed limbs. Induced EEG will be recorded during cue-based motor imagination where the task will comprise patients sitting in front of a computer screen and undergoing several trials imagining waving their left hand, right hand or tapping both feet. The motor imagery session will be separated into 6 sub sessions each last approximately 5 minutes, to minimise patient discomfort due to tiredness and increased level of concentration. Duration of the EEG recording including setup, breaks and active participation will be up to 1.5 hours. Patients will be allowed to use their mobile phone or to read during the setup period.
In summary, sensory tests and EEG recording will take approximately 2 hours and will be performed on the same day. Filling out self-administered questionnaires will take up to an additional 30 min and may be carried out on the same day or separately. During the first assessment patients will get advice and assistance from researchers when completing the questionnaires. For the second assessment they will be able to fill them out at home on their own.
- Conditions
- Central Neuropathic Pain, Spinal Cord Injuries
- Being tested
- EEG recording 1, EEG recording 2, Sensory Test, Brief Pain Inventory 1, Multidimensional health locus of control
- Keywords
- Spinal Cord Injury, Central Neuropathic Pain, EEG, Pain markers
- Medical subject headings
- Spinal Cord Injuries
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
EEG recording 1Diagnostic test
Multichannel EEG recording in eyes opened and eyes closed relaxed state and during imagined movement (all one experimental session). EEG device "usbamp" (company "Guger Technologies", Austria) will be used.
EEG recording 2Diagnostic test
Multichannel EEG recording in eyes opened and eyes closed relaxed state and during imagined movement (all one experimental session). This intervention will take place six month after EEG recording 1. EEG device "usbamp" (company "Guger Technologies", Austria) will be used.
Sensory TestDiagnostic test
Test for mechanical sensations of the feet and shins of both legs as well as on the trapezoidal muscle on both sides. Semmes-Weinstein Monofilaments will be used
Brief Pain Inventory 1Diagnostic test
This questionnaire that ask about any acute or chronic pain
Multidimensional health locus of controlDiagnostic test
Questionnaire that test personal belief about control of one's own health
Sensory test thermalDiagnostic test
Test of thermal sensations (thermal roller) of the feet and shins of both legs as well as on the trapezoidal muscle on both sides. A "Somedic SenseLab Rolltemp" device will be used
Neuropathic pain symptomsDiagnostic test
Questionnaire that test for neuropathic pain symptoms
McGill pain questionnaireDiagnostic test
Questionnaire assess three separate components of experiencing pain; the sensory intensity, the emotional impact and the cognitive evaluation of pain.
Pain Catastrophising ScaleDiagnostic test
Questionnaire use to identify individual pain experience.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| SCI with CNP | People with subacute spinal cord injury and no chronic pain Receives: Diagnostic Test: EEG recording 1; Diagnostic Test: EEG recording 2; Diagnostic Test: Sensory Test; Diagnostic Test: Brief Pain Inventory 1; Diagnostic Test: Multidimensional health locus of control; Diagnostic Test: Sensory test thermal; Diagnostic Test: Neuropathic pain symptoms; Diagnostic Test: McGill pain questionnaire; Diagnostic Test: Pain Catastrophising Scale | |
| SCI no CNP | People with subacute spinal cord injury with central neuropathic pain Receives: Diagnostic Test: EEG recording 1; Diagnostic Test: EEG recording 2; Diagnostic Test: Sensory Test; Diagnostic Test: Brief Pain Inventory 1; Diagnostic Test: Sensory test thermal; Diagnostic Test: Neuropathic pain symptoms | |
| Able bodied | Able bodied people with no chronic pain Receives: Diagnostic Test: EEG recording 1; Diagnostic Test: Brief Pain Inventory 1 |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
EEG based classifier of pain
Create a software application that can classifify between people with SCI and healthy people and people with SCI with and without pain based on EEG markers
Measured: All groups EEG recording upon recruitment
Changes in EEG
Difference between baseline EEG and EEG recorded six months later
Measured: EEG recording upon recruitment and EEG recording six month later in all groups of people with SCI
Secondary outcomes (3)
EEG markers of different phased of SCI
To characterise EEG features which may describe different phases in the development of CNP in SCI which may characterise how EEG markers evolve over time in SCI, starting before the onset of any physical symptoms
Measured: Fist EEG recording upon recruitment, second six month later
EEG markers of at level and below level pain
Anlysis of EEG in people with different types of neuropathic pain (under and at level of injury)
Measured: Fist EEG recording upon recruitment, second six month later
Correlation between sensory and neurological test and questionnaires
To compare and combine EEG predictors using prediction markers evoked in response to peripheral test sensory stimuli (e.g. mechanical, thermal stimuli)
Measured: Fist EEG recording, sensory test and questionnaires uppon recruitment, second six month later
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted11 Dec 2020
- Study start15 Jan 2021 (estimated)
- Primary completion1 Nov 2022 (estimated)
- Study completion1 Apr 2023 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Central Neuropathic PainStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 80 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Buckinghamshire Healthcare NHS Trust
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Aleksandra Vuckovic, Study director, University of Glasgow
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04665492
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- GN20NE240
- Other IDs
- 280703
- Status last verified
- Nov 2020
- First submitted
- 16 Nov 2020
- Last updated
- 16 Dec 2020
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided: Shared on request
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 16 Dec 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Electroencephalographic Predictors of Central Neuropathic Pain in Subacute Spinal Cord Injury
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04665492
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- GN20NE240
- Conditions
- Central Neuropathic Pain, Spinal Cord Injuries
- Keywords
- Spinal Cord Injury, Central Neuropathic Pain, EEG, Pain markers
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 80 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- NHS Greater Glasgow and ClydeUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Buckinghamshire Healthcare NHS Trust
- Study start
- 15 Jan 2021 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 1 Nov 2022 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 1 Apr 2023 (estimated)
- First posted
- 11 Dec 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Spinal cord injury (SCI), induced by damage to the spinal cord, can cause life-altering levels of disability including the development of chronic pain. Central Neuropathic Pain (CNP) typically develops within months after injury in 40-50% of SCI patients, affecting everyday activity, sleep and mood. There is no cure for CNP, it can be very difficult to treat and is often refractory to any pharmacological treatments.
In a previous study (study no. 14/WS/1029) the principle investigators showed that the likelihood of CNP developing can be predicted by defining characteristics of brain waves that are related to pain. We will use electroencephalograph (EEG) to measure brain activity in people early after SCI, before they develop pain, knowing that about half will develop pain within a year. We aim to recruit 80 participants, aged 18-80; 40 with subacute spinal injury (level C3-T12) and no symptoms of CNP; 20 with symptoms of CNP and 20 able-bodied participants. Completeness of injury is irrelevant. Patients will be recruited by clinical consultants within national spinal units in Glasgow and Stoke Mandeville. Patients will undergo two EEG recording sessions in which they will imagine movements while we record EEG. Sessions will also involve basic sensory testing and completion of questionnaires. Able-bodied participants will be recruited by the Philosophy Doctor (PhD) candidate at the University of Glasgow and undergo only one EEG session (identical to SCI patients).
The primary aim of this study is to use early EEG markers of CNP to optimise and validate an existing computer program based on machine learning to enable more accurate prediction of pain in newly injured patients with the hope of aiding future treatments. Secondary aims include characterising EEG features which might describe different phases in patients' development of CNP and exploring possible differences between pain at/below the level of SCI based on EEG markers.
Detailed description
Study Design The proposed study will be a longitudinal cohort study in which participants will attend one assessment session as inpatients in the subacute stage and a further assessment six months later, during which time patients are likely to be outpatients. Each session will last up to two hours and questionnaires may be completed within the hospital or outside. To minimise the drop-out, patients will be followed-up though their regular visits to the Queen Elizabeth National Spinal Injuries Uni (QENSIU) or Stoke Mandeville National Spinal Injuries Centre (NSIC) to categorise occurrence of pain, based on the recommended criteria for CNP and the International Spinal Cord Injury Pain Classification System. For those unable to attend the follow-up session, Co-Investigators will take information from their patient notes about their pain, allodynia and hyperalgesia in order to ensure that pain status is collected twice for all participants.
The study will be carried out on 20 able bodied and 60 subacute SCI patients, 40 with no CNP, and 20 with CNP (refer to section 8 for group size considerations). All patients will attend two recording sessions, 2 hours in length, during which time they will undergo EEG recordings as well as sensory testing (including mechanical and thermal tests). This is based on protocol used with the previous cohort. The first test will be carried out as soon as the patients' health condition allows them to sit for the duration of the experiment (this could be within first 3-6 months post injury as Stoke Mandeville Natioanl Spinal Injury Centre (NSIC) does not admit any early injury patients) and the second assessment will take place approximately 6 months later. Able-bodied participants will attend only one session.
Recruitment QENSIU admits around 110 new patients annually whilst Stoke Mandeville Hospital admits around 200. This gives 600 potential volunteers over a 2 year period which should be sufficient to recruit the targeted number. It is planned to recruit approximately half of participants (around 30 people with SCI) from each centre.
Patients will be identified and approached by their clinical consultants (Co-Investigators Dr Mariel Purcell and Dr Maurizio Belci). Prior to participating, patients will be given information sheets and consent forms to sign and should the participant themselves be unable to physically sign, a witnessed proxy can do so on the patient's behalf.
Able bodied participants will be recruited by advertising the study at the University of Glasgow and their data will be collected within the University of Glasgow Rehabilitation Engineering laboratory on University Campus. They will be recruited by the PhD student.
Assessments The patient participants will attend one assessment session as inpatients in the subacute stage and a further assessment six months later. Experimental and data collection procedures will be identical in both the first and second assessments undertaken by patients. This includes EEG recordings, sensory testing and questionnaires. Able bodied participants will only attend one assessment.
Experimental Procedures Questionnaires During assessment sessions, all patients will be asked to complete questionnaires which will allow us collect data on the status of their pain at the time of each visit.
The following questionnaires will be given to patients who at the time of assessment experience CNP:
- Brief Pain Inventory
- McGill pain questionnaire
- Neuropathic Pain Symptoms Inventory
- Multidimensional health locus of control (referring to spinal cord injury as "condition")
- Pain catastrophising scale (referring to the existing pain)
Patients who at the time of first assessment already had pain will be asked to repeat only first two questionnaires on the second assessment, after 6 months. It takes approximately 30 min to fill out all 5 questionnaires. Patients can fill out questionnaires at their own time. Outpatients (second assessment) will receive questionnaires and an envelope with a stamp to post it, or they could alternatively take scan/photos of questionnaires and send them to research team.
Patients with no pain will be asked to complete:
- Brief Pain Inventory
- Multidimensional health locus of control (referring to spinal cord injury as "condition")
Able bodied participants will be asked to fill out the Brief Pain Inventory. All patients with CNP will be diagnosed prior to the study as part of their regular treatment at the hospital. The diagnosis is based on recommendations by the International Spinal Cord Association.
Equipment All equipment has necessary medical device Certificate Europe (CE) mark. Both spinal units (QENSIU and NSIC) and University facilities (for able-bodied assessments) have the same equipment.
Sensory Tests We will use existing clinical American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) testing information to assess the level and completes of injury i.e. we will gain this information from patient notes following assessment performed by healthcare professional.
All patients will be tested for mechanical and thermal sensations at the foot and shin of both legs and on the trapezoidal muscle on both sides. These are recommended sensory sites from the literature for the following reasons: the feet and shanks are under the level of injury in both tetra and paraplegic patients and are typically reported as locations where most patients with SCI CNP report pain. Trapezoidal muscles are above the level of injury for all patients. Testing only 3 sites on both sides should minimise total assessment time and reduce patients' inconvenience.
Sensory mechanical assessments will comprise a determination of light touch and pinprick which will also serve as a sign of allodynia and hyperalgesia. A mechanical wind up test (with monofilament no. 6.65) will be performed and sensory thermal tests will be conducted using a device named "Rolltemp" (manufacturer "Somedic SenseLab" ). This device consists of two rollers on handles, one roller being warm and the other cold. These are rolled over the skin of the patients who are able to determine the corresponding sensations. Sensory testing will take 30-40 min.
Able bodied participants will not undergo sensory tests.
EEG Recording EEG will be recorded from 64 locations over the entire scalp according to the American Clinical Neurophysiology Society's 10-10 system. EEG will be recorded with a g.Tech biosignal USB amplifier (Guger Technologies, Austria) which enables on-line EEG measurement, signal analysis and visualisation of EEG signals on a computer screen.
Markers of longstanding CNP are present in both spontaneous and induced states such as during motor imagination. As such, EEG activity will first be recorded in the relaxed state of all patients with eyes open and eyes closed (spontaneous EEG), followed by EEG recording during cue-based motor imagination as done previously with the original cohort. This study showed that the presence of CNP affects cortical areas of both paralysed and non-paralysed limbs. Induced EEG will be recorded during cue-based motor imagination where the task will comprise patients sitting in front of a computer screen and undergoing several trials imagining waving their left hand, right hand or tapping both feet. The motor imagery session will be separated into 6 sub sessions each last approximately 5 minutes, to minimise patient discomfort due to tiredness and increased level of concentration. Duration of the EEG recording including setup, breaks and active participation will be up to 1.5 hours. Patients will be allowed to use their mobile phone or to read during the setup period.
In summary, sensory tests and EEG recording will take approximately 2 hours and will be performed on the same day. Filling out self-administered questionnaires will take up to an additional 30 min and may be carried out on the same day or separately. During the first assessment patients will get advice and assistance from researchers when completing the questionnaires. For the second assessment they will be able to fill them out at home on their own.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| SCI with CNP | – | Diagnostic Test: EEG recording 1, Diagnostic Test: EEG recording 2, Diagnostic Test: Sensory Test, Diagnostic Test: Brief Pain Inventory 1, Diagnostic Test: Multidimensional health locus of control, Diagnostic Test: Sensory test thermal, Diagnostic Test: Neuropathic pain symptoms, Diagnostic Test: McGill pain questionnaire, Diagnostic Test: Pain Catastrophising ScalePeople with subacute spinal cord injury and no chronic pain |
| SCI no CNP | – | Diagnostic Test: EEG recording 1, Diagnostic Test: EEG recording 2, Diagnostic Test: Sensory Test, Diagnostic Test: Brief Pain Inventory 1, Diagnostic Test: Sensory test thermal, Diagnostic Test: Neuropathic pain symptomsPeople with subacute spinal cord injury with central neuropathic pain |
| Able bodied | – | Diagnostic Test: EEG recording 1, Diagnostic Test: Brief Pain Inventory 1Able bodied people with no chronic pain |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Able bodied people and people with subacute spinal cord injury
Key inclusion criteria (20 listed)
- Age between 18-80
- Subacute spinal cord injury (within 6 months post injury)
- Level C3-T12
- ASIA A, B, C or D
- Normal or corrected to normal vision
Key exclusion criteria (17 listed)
- Inability to understand the task
- Inability to sit for at least 2 hours (duration of EEG assessment)
- Invasive 24/7 ventilation
- Previously confirmed brain injury, (peripheral nerve injury and brachial plexus injury)
- Other self-reported neurological condition that would affect EEG recording
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| EEG recording 1Multichannel EEG recording in eyes opened and eyes closed relaxed state and during imagined movement (all one experimental session). EEG device "usbamp" (company "Guger Technologies", Austria) will be used. | Diagnostic test | Able bodied, SCI no CNP, SCI with CNP |
| EEG recording 2Multichannel EEG recording in eyes opened and eyes closed relaxed state and during imagined movement (all one experimental session). This intervention will take place six month after EEG recording 1. EEG device "usbamp" (company "Guger Technologies", Austria) will be used. | Diagnostic test | SCI no CNP, SCI with CNP |
| Sensory TestTest for mechanical sensations of the feet and shins of both legs as well as on the trapezoidal muscle on both sides. Semmes-Weinstein Monofilaments will be used | Diagnostic test | SCI no CNP, SCI with CNP |
| Brief Pain Inventory 1This questionnaire that ask about any acute or chronic pain | Diagnostic test | Able bodied, SCI no CNP, SCI with CNP |
| Multidimensional health locus of controlQuestionnaire that test personal belief about control of one's own health | Diagnostic test | SCI with CNP |
| Sensory test thermalTest of thermal sensations (thermal roller) of the feet and shins of both legs as well as on the trapezoidal muscle on both sides. A "Somedic SenseLab Rolltemp" device will be used | Diagnostic test | SCI no CNP, SCI with CNP |
| Neuropathic pain symptomsQuestionnaire that test for neuropathic pain symptoms | Diagnostic test | SCI no CNP, SCI with CNP |
| McGill pain questionnaireQuestionnaire assess three separate components of experiencing pain; the sensory intensity, the emotional impact and the cognitive evaluation of pain. | Diagnostic test | SCI with CNP |
| Pain Catastrophising ScaleQuestionnaire use to identify individual pain experience. | Diagnostic test | SCI with CNP |
Primary outcome
EEG based classifier of pain
Time frame: All groups EEG recording upon recruitment
Create a software application that can classifify between people with SCI and healthy people and people with SCI with and without pain based on EEG markers
Changes in EEG
Time frame: EEG recording upon recruitment and EEG recording six month later in all groups of people with SCI
Difference between baseline EEG and EEG recorded six months later
3 secondary outcomes
EEG markers of different phased of SCI
Time frame: Fist EEG recording upon recruitment, second six month later
EEG markers of at level and below level pain
Time frame: Fist EEG recording upon recruitment, second six month later
Correlation between sensory and neurological test and questionnaires
Time frame: Fist EEG recording, sensory test and questionnaires uppon recruitment, second six month later
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 16 Dec 2020.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided. Shared on request
Related trials for Central Neuropathic Pain
Recruiting
Virtual Reality-Based Hypnotherapy for Pain, Sleep, and Mood in Spinal Cord Injury
Spinal Cord Injuries (SCI), Chronic Pain
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Simultaneous Engagement of Networks for Alleviating Pain (SENAP)
Neuropathic Pain, Postherpetic Neuralgia
Not yet recruitingObservational study
SERENITY Study of Chronic Pain Interference in Adults
Chronic Low Back Pain, Spinal Cord Injury
Recruiting
Effect of TMS on Neuropathic Pain for Patients With Spinal Cord Injury
Spinal Cord Injury, Neuropathic Pain
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Twenty-five Years of Advanced RadioTherapy at San Raffaele Hospital
Malignant Tumor, Benign Neoplasm
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Aleksandra Vuckovic study director
University of Glasgow
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Central Neuropathic Pain and Spinal Cord Injuries, run by NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde at 2 sites in United Kingdom.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 20 inclusion and 17 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Dec 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Aleksandra Vuckovic, PhD (07906441955, aleksandra.vuckovic@glasgow.ac.uk), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
EEG based classifier of pain (time frame: All groups EEG recording upon recruitment). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Dec 2020.