AzTrials
AzTrials

Self EsteemSSEONINCT04668287

Improving Students' Self-esteem With an Online Intervention

A study testing Increasing self-esteem in people with Self Esteem, run by West University of Timisoara at 1 site in Romania.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The aim of this study is to measure the impact of an online intervention on students' self-esteem, using the model outlined by Melanie Fennell. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Self Esteem
What is being tested?
Increasing self-esteem
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
33 participants
Where
1 siteRomania
Study dates
11 Nov 2020to 18 Dec 2020
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Low Self-Esteem (Cut-off=35 at Rosenberg self-esteem scale)
  • Being first year student in West University of Timisoara

Who cannot join

  • Severe clinical depression symptoms (Cut-off=15 at PHQ9)
  • Severe clinical anxiety symptoms (Cut-off=15 at GAD7)

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Romania1 site
  • West University of Timișoara

    Timișoara, 320104

Other trials in Romania

About this study

Official title: Improving Students' Self-esteem With an Online Intervention Based on the Fennel Model: An Open-label, Uncontrolled Pilot Trial

The aim of this study is to measure the impact of an online intervention on students' self-esteem, using the model outlined by Melanie Fennell.

Read the detailed description

The purpose of this study is to test the level of students' self-esteem (explicit and implicit) before and after an online intervention. All selected participants will enjoy one of the online working groups led by a psychologist for five weeks. In these group sessions, students will be trained to identify how their low self-esteem was developed, what are those factors that maintain their low self-esteem and what can they do for improving their low self-esteem, using Fennell model.

Conditions
Self Esteem
Being tested
Increasing self-esteem

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Increasing self-esteemBehavioural

    During 5 weeks, participants will be part of one of the working groups in which they'll be taught by a counselor about how a low self-esteem develops and what have to be done for improving self-esteem, based on the Melanie Fennel' model.

Study groups in NCT04668287
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Increasing Self-EsteemOtherAll participants will be included in working groups.
Receives: Behavioral: Increasing self-esteem

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Changes in Rosenberg's Self Esteem Scale

    Rosenberg's Self Esteem Scale is a self-esteem measure widely used in social-science research. It is a ten-item likert-type scale with items answered on a four-point scale-from strongly disagree to strongly agree. The scale measures global self-worth by measuring both positive and negative feelings about the self. The minimum score of Rosenberg's Self Esteem Scale is 10 and the highest one is 40. A higher score means a better outcome.

    Measured: Change from Pre- to Post-Intervention (5 weeks)

Secondary outcomes (7)
  1. Name Letter Test

    Name Letter Test is used to measure implicit self-esteem by testing the tendency to evaluate alphabetical letters in one's name, especially initials, particularly favorably.

    Measured: Change from Pre- to Post-Intervention (5 weeks)

  2. Academic Burnout Scale

    This scale is designed to measure the level of students' burnout. It contains 3 subscales: Exhaustion (minimum score: 5, maximum: 25), Cynicism (minimum score: 5, maximum: 25), Inefficacy (minimum score: 6, maximum: 30). A higher score means a worse outcome. Beside that, it can be scored Core Burnout, as sum between Exhaustion and Cynicism.

    Measured: Change from Pre- to Post-Intervention (5 weeks)

  3. Generalised Anxiety Disorder Assessment (GAD7)

    Generalised Anxiety Disorder Assessment is a self-administered 7 item instrument that uses some of the DSM-V criteria for GAD (General Anxiety Disorder) to identify probable cases of GAD along with measuring anxiety symptom severity. The minimum score of Generalised Anxiety Disorder Assessment is 0 and the highest one is 21. A higher score means a worse outcome (a higher level of anxiety).

    Measured: Change from Pre- to Post-Intervention (5 weeks)

  4. Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ9)

    Patient Health Questionnaire-9 was designed to measure participant's severity of depression using DSM IV criteria. The minimum score of Patient Health Questionnaire-9 is 0 and the highest one is 27. A higher score means a worse outcome (more severe symptoms of depression).

    Measured: Change from Pre- to Post-Intervention (5 weeks)

  5. Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire

    Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire is a scale designed to measure the level of students' satisfaction with intervention. The items refer to the content of the intervention, being open and close questions.

    Measured: Post-Intervention (5 weeks)

  6. Therapeutic factors

    A 9 item questionnaire designed to measure the impact of some of the therapeutic factors as universality, altruism, instillation of hope, etc (Yalom, I. D., \& Leszcz, M. (Collaborator). (2005). The theory and practice of group psychotherapy (5th ed.)). For each of the 9 factors, the minimum score is 1 and the maximum one is 5. A higher score means a better outcome (that factor is relevant for intervention).

    Measured: Post-Intervention (5 weeks)

  7. System usability

    A 10 item questionnaire designed to measure participants' satisfaction with Zoom, the online platform used for weekly meetings. The minimum score of System Usability Scale is 10 and the highest one is 50. A higher score means a better outcome.

    Measured: Post-Intervention (5 weeks)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted16 Dec 2020
  2. Study start11 Nov 2020
  3. Primary completion13 Nov 2020
  4. Study completion18 Dec 2020

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Model description
Open-Label Pilot Study
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
33 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04668287
Sponsor's protocol ID
WUTimisoara
Acronym
SSEONI
Status last verified
Feb 2023
First submitted
8 Dec 2020
Last updated
10 May 2024
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Increasing self-esteem in people with Self Esteem, run by West University of Timisoara at 1 site in Romania.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 May 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Romania. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Changes in Rosenberg's Self Esteem Scale (time frame: Change from Pre- to Post-Intervention (5 weeks)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 May 2024.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in