Spinal Cord Injuries and DisordersMMSW-SCINCT04668326
Mobile Manual Standing Wheelchair for SCI
A study testing Manual Standing Wheelchair and Mobile Manual Standing Wheelchair in people with Spinal Cord Injuries and Disorders, run by VA Office of Research and Development at 2 sites in United States.
Trial summary
People with spinal cord injuries (SCI) are particularly prone to complications from excessive sitting, because many are not able to stand without support. Excessive sitting after SCI is believed to contribute to pressure injuries, pain, osteoporosis, joint stiffness, spasticity, and worsening bowel and bladder… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Spinal Cord Injuries and Disorders
- What is being tested?
- Manual Standing Wheelchair and Mobile Manual Standing Wheelchair
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 25 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- 1 May 2023to 31 Mar 2026
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- United States Veteran
- SCI or stable disorder/dysfunction of the spinal cord
- Tolerates manual wheelchair use on a regular basis
- Sufficient hand \& arm function to operate manual standing wheelchair
- Unable to stand independently without support
- Greater than 6 months post-injury (SCI), or 6 months post diagnosis (disorder/dysfunction)
Show all 12Show fewer
- Weight less than 125 kg (275 lbs)
- Age 18 or older
- Decisional competency to provide consent and cognitive ability to participate fully in study procedures
- Body size appropriate to fit the devices
- Not involved in another study related to mobility
- Identify an appropriate location for use of the study wheelchair
Who cannot join
- Contraindication for standing including lower limb contractures, uncontrolled hypertension, uncontrolled spasticity, etc.
- Unhealed lower-limb fractures
- Unstable lower-limb joints
- An active grade 2 or greater pressure injury that can be worsened by standing in the device
- Flap procedure to address pressure injury less than one year earlier
- Not able to propel a manual wheelchair or operate the sit-to-stand mechanism (e.g. weakness, or discomfort)
Show all 10Show fewer
- Low bone mineral density (BMD), defined by total hip DXA more than 3.5 SD below peak and/or distal femur/proximal tibia BMD below 0.6 g/cm2. (Low BMD at any site will be ineligible).
- Unable to obtain clinically acceptable seating system for study wheelchairs
- Unable to build up standing tolerance within the first eight visits
- Individual deemed not appropriate for participation in the study as determined by study team
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country.
United States2 sites
Minneapolis VA Health Care System, Minneapolis, MN
Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55417-2309
VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA
Palo Alto, California, 94304-1207
About this study
Official title: Impact of Mobile Manual Standing Wheelchair on Standing Dosage and Utility
People with spinal cord injuries (SCI) are particularly prone to complications from excessive sitting, because many are not able to stand without support. Excessive sitting after SCI is believed to contribute to pressure injuries, pain, osteoporosis, joint stiffness, spasticity, and worsening bowel and bladder function. The VA has developed, patented, and licensed a mobile manual standing wheelchair (MMSW), and the investigators believe the key feature of being able to wheel around while in a standing position will dramatically change how paralyzed Veterans function in their home and community. If this expanded utility is realized, persons with SCI may naturally spend more time standing and less time sitting. To test these ideas, Veterans with SCI will be randomized to using one of two manual standing wheelchairs at home and in the community for two months.
Read the detailed description
Background - The investigators contend that for Veterans with SCI to stand enough to impact health outcomes, the standing device must enhance utility while integrating into their everyday life; at home, at work, and in the community. For this integration to occur, the investigators believe the standing device must fulfill the following criteria: 1. Easy access, 2. Straightforward standing mechanism, 3. Mobility in both seated and standing positions, 4. Natural intuitive propulsion, 5. Stability, and 6. Independent operability. The Minneapolis Adaptive Design \& Engineering (MADE) Program has recently developed a mobile manual standing wheelchair (MMSW) with all these features. Based on initial in-lab pilot testing, Veterans who trialed the device demonstrated excellent functional mobility and stability in both seated and standing postures. User feedback received during this initial testing also indicated these unique mobility and stability features offer potential new utility for Veterans with SCI.
Research Questions (Objectives) - The purpose of this project is to extend testing of the MMSW to home and community environments of 48 Veterans with SCI to see if mobility in standing affects utility and standing time.
Relevance to VA - There is a mounting body of literature showing significant adverse health consequences associated with excessive time spent in a seated position. Any person who has an underlying condition which impairs their ability to stand or walk is at increased risk for seating related adverse health consequences. There are an estimated 1.7 million people in the United States who have enough impairment that they use seated mobility devices (wheelchairs and scooters). Specifically, people with spinal cord injuries (SCI) are particularly prone to complications from excessive sitting, because many are unable to stand without some type of support. According to the VA's Corporate Data Warehouse, the VA provides care to 17,886 Veterans with SCI/D each year and estimate that over 7,000 of these Veterans have paraplegia. Excessive sitting after SCI is believed to contribute to pressure injuries, worsening pain, osteoporosis, joint stiffness, spasticity, and worsening bowel and bladder function. Until recently, there have been few practical options for safely supporting these individuals while standing or walking. Although there is now a growing list of assistive devices available to support standing and walking in SCI, relatively little attention has been given to determining how often such devices are used or how often they would need to be used to optimally promote the various potential health-related outcomes, nor which devices are most likely to achieve these changes.
Number of Research Participants (Sample Size) - Forty-eight participants (24/group) will be randomized. Each of the two study sites will be expected to screen up to 390 participants to reach the target of 48 randomized over both sites.
Participating Sites - Minneapolis VA Health Care System, VA Palo Alto Health Care System
Duration of Participant Intake (Study Duration) - This project is projected to be a total of four years. The two study sites will have a start-up period of between three to six months and will recruit for approximately three years. The remaining six to nine months will be used for dissemination of study results and study close-out.
Treatment (follow-up) - The intervention being tested is two months of home and community use of a manual standing wheelchair (mobile or non-mobile in standing).
Endpoints - The primary outcomes for this study are utility and standing dose.
Utility - The utility of the study wheelchairs and the current standing device (when applicable) will be assessed using the Wheelchair Outcome Measure (WhOM). The WhOM focuses on ICF constructs of participation and body function. It will be slightly modified to ask users to provide participation goals in the home and community in the context of standing devices/wheelchairs as opposed to wheelchairs alone. The WhOM collects activities that are goals for participation and then has the participant rank the importance and satisfaction with each activity. These rankings allow a quantitative score to be calculated for comparison.
Standing dose - Acceleration data from data loggers will be downloaded and placed on a secure server for further analysis. These data will be visually inspected to determine a threshold for distinguishing sitting and standing postures. These values may vary depending on the mounting on each standing device. After mounting with each system, the participant will go through a sit-to-stand movement and data will be uploaded to ensure the system is detecting movement. This initial movement will also be used to determine an appropriate threshold for standing/sitting. In addition to overall standing time, the investigators will examine frequency of standing bouts and time per standing bout as these are relevant for future pressure injury prevention. The investigators will also monitor movement of the wheelchair during both sitting and standing to understand how often the mobility feature of the MMSW is used during the study.
- Conditions
- Spinal Cord Injuries and Disorders
- Being tested
- Manual Standing Wheelchair, Mobile Manual Standing Wheelchair
- Keywords
- Paraplegia, Mobility, Standing, Spinal Cord Injury
- Medical subject headings
- Spinal Cord Injuries, Disease, Paraplegia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Manual Standing WheelchairDevice
Also called Levo Summit Wheelchair
Mobile in seated position; Not mobile in standing position
Mobile Manual Standing WheelchairDevice
Also called Modified Levo Summit Wheelchair
Mobile in BOTH seated and standing positions
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Manual Standing Wheelchair | Active comparator | Mobile in seated position; Not mobile in standing position Receives: Device: Manual Standing Wheelchair |
| Mobile Manual Standing Wheelchair | Experimental | Mobile in BOTH seated and standing positions Receives: Device: Mobile Manual Standing Wheelchair |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Utility - Measured using the Wheelchair Outcome Measure
The Wheelchair Outcome Measure (WhOM) will be slightly modified to ask users to provide participation goals in the home and community in the context of standing devices/wheelchairs as opposed to wheelchairs alone. The WhOM collects activities that are goals for participation and then has the participant rank the importance and satisfaction with each activity. The rankings allow a quantitative score to be calculated for comparison. The WhOM was chosen to represent the concept of "utility" because it captures what is meaningful and important to each participant, while also allowing a quantitative scoring.
The investigators will specifically calculate Mean satisfaction x importance = the sum of the individual importance x satisfaction of all goals divided number of goals
Higher scores indicate higher satisfaction with specific goals, using importance of the task to help scale the effect of each goal. Thus higher scores will be considered higher utility.
Measured: Two months
Standing Dose - Total time standing - Study Wheelchair
An accelerometer will be placed on part of the study standing wheelchair that rotates upward during standing. The gravitational acceleration will indicate standing versus sitting. A custom algorithm will be used to determine when the wheelchair is in the standing position.
Measured: Two months
Standing Dose - Total time standing - Existing Standing Device
An accelerometer will be placed on part of the existing standing device (when applicable) that rotates upward during standing. The gravitational acceleration will indicate standing versus sitting. A custom algorithm will be used to determine when the standing device is in the standing position.
Measured: Two months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted16 Dec 2020
- Study start1 May 2023
- Primary completion30 Sep 2025
- Study completion31 Mar 2026
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Spinal Cord Injuries and DisordersStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by VA Office of Research and DevelopmentThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Randomized Controlled Device Trial
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 25 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- VA Office of Research and Development
- Sponsor type
- US federal agency
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Andrew H Hansen, PhD, Principal investigator, Minneapolis VA Health Care System, Minneapolis, MNB. Jenny Kiratli, PhD, Principal investigator, VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04668326
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- F3505-R
- Acronym
- MMSW-SCI
- Status last verified
- Apr 2026
- First submitted
- 27 Nov 2020
- Last updated
- 9 Apr 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 9 Apr 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Impact of Mobile Manual Standing Wheelchair on Standing Dosage and Utility
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04668326
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- MMSW-SCI / F3505-R
- Conditions
- Spinal Cord Injuries and Disorders
- Keywords
- Paraplegia, Mobility, Standing, Spinal Cord Injury
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 25 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- VA Office of Research and DevelopmentUS federal agency
- Study start
- 1 May 2023 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Sep 2025 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 Mar 2026 (actual)
- First posted
- 16 Dec 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
People with spinal cord injuries (SCI) are particularly prone to complications from excessive sitting, because many are not able to stand without support. Excessive sitting after SCI is believed to contribute to pressure injuries, pain, osteoporosis, joint stiffness, spasticity, and worsening bowel and bladder function. The VA has developed, patented, and licensed a mobile manual standing wheelchair (MMSW), and the investigators believe the key feature of being able to wheel around while in a standing position will dramatically change how paralyzed Veterans function in their home and community. If this expanded utility is realized, persons with SCI may naturally spend more time standing and less time sitting. To test these ideas, Veterans with SCI will be randomized to using one of two manual standing wheelchairs at home and in the community for two months.
Detailed description
Background - The investigators contend that for Veterans with SCI to stand enough to impact health outcomes, the standing device must enhance utility while integrating into their everyday life; at home, at work, and in the community. For this integration to occur, the investigators believe the standing device must fulfill the following criteria: 1. Easy access, 2. Straightforward standing mechanism, 3. Mobility in both seated and standing positions, 4. Natural intuitive propulsion, 5. Stability, and 6. Independent operability. The Minneapolis Adaptive Design \& Engineering (MADE) Program has recently developed a mobile manual standing wheelchair (MMSW) with all these features. Based on initial in-lab pilot testing, Veterans who trialed the device demonstrated excellent functional mobility and stability in both seated and standing postures. User feedback received during this initial testing also indicated these unique mobility and stability features offer potential new utility for Veterans with SCI.
Research Questions (Objectives) - The purpose of this project is to extend testing of the MMSW to home and community environments of 48 Veterans with SCI to see if mobility in standing affects utility and standing time.
Relevance to VA - There is a mounting body of literature showing significant adverse health consequences associated with excessive time spent in a seated position. Any person who has an underlying condition which impairs their ability to stand or walk is at increased risk for seating related adverse health consequences. There are an estimated 1.7 million people in the United States who have enough impairment that they use seated mobility devices (wheelchairs and scooters). Specifically, people with spinal cord injuries (SCI) are particularly prone to complications from excessive sitting, because many are unable to stand without some type of support. According to the VA's Corporate Data Warehouse, the VA provides care to 17,886 Veterans with SCI/D each year and estimate that over 7,000 of these Veterans have paraplegia. Excessive sitting after SCI is believed to contribute to pressure injuries, worsening pain, osteoporosis, joint stiffness, spasticity, and worsening bowel and bladder function. Until recently, there have been few practical options for safely supporting these individuals while standing or walking. Although there is now a growing list of assistive devices available to support standing and walking in SCI, relatively little attention has been given to determining how often such devices are used or how often they would need to be used to optimally promote the various potential health-related outcomes, nor which devices are most likely to achieve these changes.
Number of Research Participants (Sample Size) - Forty-eight participants (24/group) will be randomized. Each of the two study sites will be expected to screen up to 390 participants to reach the target of 48 randomized over both sites.
Participating Sites - Minneapolis VA Health Care System, VA Palo Alto Health Care System
Duration of Participant Intake (Study Duration) - This project is projected to be a total of four years. The two study sites will have a start-up period of between three to six months and will recruit for approximately three years. The remaining six to nine months will be used for dissemination of study results and study close-out.
Treatment (follow-up) - The intervention being tested is two months of home and community use of a manual standing wheelchair (mobile or non-mobile in standing).
Endpoints - The primary outcomes for this study are utility and standing dose.
Utility - The utility of the study wheelchairs and the current standing device (when applicable) will be assessed using the Wheelchair Outcome Measure (WhOM). The WhOM focuses on ICF constructs of participation and body function. It will be slightly modified to ask users to provide participation goals in the home and community in the context of standing devices/wheelchairs as opposed to wheelchairs alone. The WhOM collects activities that are goals for participation and then has the participant rank the importance and satisfaction with each activity. These rankings allow a quantitative score to be calculated for comparison.
Standing dose - Acceleration data from data loggers will be downloaded and placed on a secure server for further analysis. These data will be visually inspected to determine a threshold for distinguishing sitting and standing postures. These values may vary depending on the mounting on each standing device. After mounting with each system, the participant will go through a sit-to-stand movement and data will be uploaded to ensure the system is detecting movement. This initial movement will also be used to determine an appropriate threshold for standing/sitting. In addition to overall standing time, the investigators will examine frequency of standing bouts and time per standing bout as these are relevant for future pressure injury prevention. The investigators will also monitor movement of the wheelchair during both sitting and standing to understand how often the mobility feature of the MMSW is used during the study.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Randomized Controlled Device Trial
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Manual Standing Wheelchair | Active comparator | Device: Manual Standing WheelchairMobile in seated position; Not mobile in standing position |
| Mobile Manual Standing Wheelchair | Experimental | Device: Mobile Manual Standing WheelchairMobile in BOTH seated and standing positions |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (12 listed)
- United States Veteran
- SCI or stable disorder/dysfunction of the spinal cord
- Tolerates manual wheelchair use on a regular basis
- Sufficient hand \& arm function to operate manual standing wheelchair
- Unable to stand independently without support
Key exclusion criteria (10 listed)
- Contraindication for standing including lower limb contractures, uncontrolled hypertension, uncontrolled spasticity, etc.
- Unhealed lower-limb fractures
- Unstable lower-limb joints
- An active grade 2 or greater pressure injury that can be worsened by standing in the device
- Flap procedure to address pressure injury less than one year earlier
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Manual Standing WheelchairAlso: Levo Summit WheelchairMobile in seated position; Not mobile in standing position | Device | Manual Standing Wheelchair |
| Mobile Manual Standing WheelchairAlso: Modified Levo Summit WheelchairMobile in BOTH seated and standing positions | Device | Mobile Manual Standing Wheelchair |
Primary outcome
Utility - Measured using the Wheelchair Outcome Measure
Time frame: Two months
The Wheelchair Outcome Measure (WhOM) will be slightly modified to ask users to provide participation goals in the home and community in the context of standing devices/wheelchairs as opposed to wheelchairs alone. The WhOM collects activities that are goals for participation and then has the participant rank the importance and satisfaction with each activity. The rankings allow a quantitative score to be calculated for comparison. The WhOM was chosen to represent the concept of "utility" because it captures what is meaningful and important to each participant, while also allowing a quantitative scoring. The investigators will specifically calculate Mean satisfaction x importance = the sum of the individual importance x satisfaction of all goals divided number of goals Higher scores indicate higher satisfaction with specific goals, using importance of the task to help scale the effect of each goal. Thus higher scores will be considered higher utility.
Standing Dose - Total time standing - Study Wheelchair
Time frame: Two months
An accelerometer will be placed on part of the study standing wheelchair that rotates upward during standing. The gravitational acceleration will indicate standing versus sitting. A custom algorithm will be used to determine when the wheelchair is in the standing position.
Standing Dose - Total time standing - Existing Standing Device
Time frame: Two months
An accelerometer will be placed on part of the existing standing device (when applicable) that rotates upward during standing. The gravitational acceleration will indicate standing versus sitting. A custom algorithm will be used to determine when the standing device is in the standing position.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 9 Apr 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Spinal Cord Injuries and Disorders
Recruiting
Comparison Between Objective Biomechanical Cost and Perceived Physical Demand in Manual Wheelchair Users During Propulsion Tasks
Manual Wheelchair Use, Spinal Cord Injury
Not yet recruiting
Feasibility of Transcutaneous Spinal Stimulation in Rehabilitation
Spinal Cord Injuries (Complete and Incomplete), Spinal Cord Injuries (SCI)
Recruiting
Evaluating Long-term Use of a Pediatric Robotic Exoskeleton (P.REX/Agilik) to Improve Gait in Children With Movement Disorders
Cerebral Palsy, Muscular Dystrophy
Not yet recruiting
Functional Electrical Stimulation Plus High Intensity Interval Training at Home
Spinal Cord Injuries (SCI)
Enrolling by invitation
AI-Guided Multi-Electrode Transcutaneous Spinal Cord Stimulation for Gait Rehabilitation in People With Spinal Cord Injury or Stroke
Spinal Cord Injuries (SCI)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Andrew H Hansen, PhD principal investigator
Minneapolis VA Health Care System, Minneapolis, MN
B. Jenny Kiratli, PhD principal investigator
VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Manual Standing Wheelchair and Mobile Manual Standing Wheelchair in people with Spinal Cord Injuries and Disorders, run by VA Office of Research and Development at 2 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 12 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Apr 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Utility - Measured using the Wheelchair Outcome Measure (time frame: Two months). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Apr 2026.