Drug ToxicityPhase 4NCT04671589
Antidote for Valproic Acid Toxicity: a New Indication for Meropenem Antibiotic.
A Phase 4 study testing Meropenem Injection in people with Drug Toxicity, run by Mabaret Al-Asafara Hospitals at 1 site in Egypt.
Trial summary
Acute Valproic acid (VPA) toxicity is an emergency condition which may commonly present with central nervous system (CNS) depression(5). In mild poisoning, associated with VPA ingestions of 200 mg/kg, sedation and lethargy commonly occur(6); while in severe VPA poisoning associated with ingestions of 400 mg/kg or… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Drug Toxicity
- What is being tested?
- Meropenem Injection
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 48 participants
- Where
- 1 siteEgypt
- Study dates
- Jun 2021to Dec 2022
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients with VPA toxicity will be included if aged 18 years or more. The patient himself/herself should provide informed consent; a family member may take place only if there is an altered mentation that may hinder such procedure.
Who cannot join
- Patients will be excluded if presenting one hour following VPA ingestion and were administered AC for gastric decontamination, as it may decrease VPA bioavailability.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Egypt1 site
Alexandria University hospitals
Alexandria
Amr Abdallah, MD, 01000106679, amrabdalla1971icu@gmail.com
Nancy M Ahmed, MSc, 01005607730, Dr.nancymohamed@gmail.com
About this study
Official title: Antidote for Valproic Acid Toxicity: a New Indication for Meropenem Antibiotic. A Randomized Placebo-controlled Trial
Acute Valproic acid (VPA) toxicity is an emergency condition which may commonly present with central nervous system (CNS) depression(5). In mild poisoning, associated with VPA ingestions of 200 mg/kg, sedation and lethargy commonly occur(6); while in severe VPA poisoning associated with ingestions of 400 mg/kg or more, life threatening events are likely to occur as respiratory depression, metabolic acidosis, encephalopathy, hemodynamic instability, and cerebral edema which may progress to coma and even death -if not treated promptly. Supportive care along with early gastric decontamination using activated charcoal (AC) (which may only be given if patient presented early after ingestion), in addition to intravenous (IV) administration of Levocarnitine (L-Carnitine) and ensuring adequate airway protection are the cornerstone of treatment, but there remains no drug listed as a specific antidote for acute VPA intoxication. Carbapenem antibiotics augment the clearance of VPA through suppressing its enterohepatic recirculation, as they inhibit the acylpeptide hydrolase enzyme responsible for the reabsorption of the hydrolyzed valproate back to VPA active molecule. Taking advantage of this well-established drug-drug interaction between VPA and carbapenems resulting in significant drop of VPA serum concentration during concomitant use, we propose that administration of meropenem (member of carbapenems group) will prove effectiveness in managing VPA toxicity by achieving lower plasma levels of VPA and/or enhanced alertness; compared with standard care.
Read the detailed description
JUSTIFICATION AND SIGNIFICANCE:
Valproic acid (VPA) -a branched chain carboxylic acid- introduced by the Food and Drug Administration in 1978 for the treatment of seizure disorders(1). In the following years, VPA gained further approved indications to treat bipolar and behavioral disorders(2), migraine prophylaxis(3) as well as other psychiatric indications(4).The growing use of VPA and its availability resulted in increased prevalence of VPA overdoses(5,6). The rising incidence of acute VPA toxicity is either resulting from suicidal attempts, accidental ingestions, or following VPA dose increments to achieve the desired therapeutic effect(7). Acute VPA toxicity is an emergency condition which may commonly present with central nervous system (CNS) depression(5). In mild poisoning, associated with VPA ingestions of 200 mg/kg, sedation and lethargy commonly occur(6); while in severe VPA poisoning associated with ingestions of 400 mg/kg or more, life threatening events are likely to occur as respiratory depression, metabolic acidosis, encephalopathy, hemodynamic instability, and cerebral edema which may progress to coma and even death -if not treated promptly(5,8). Serum VPA concentration is the most functional tool in diagnosing and determining the severity of toxicity. Supportive care along with early gastric decontamination using activated charcoal (AC) (which may only be given if patient presented early after ingestion), in addition to intravenous (IV) administration of Levocarnitine (L-Carnitine) and ensuring adequate airway protection are the cornerstone of treatment, but there remains no drug listed as a specific antidote for acute VPA intoxication(5,9).
Carbapenems are a group of β-lactam antibiotics with a growing need to use in the empiric and definitive treatment, due to the emerging resistance to antibiotics(10). A multitude of case reports(11-13), retrospective observational studies(14-19) and reviews(20-22) demonstrated that combined use of VPA and carbapenem antibiotics -mainly meropenem (16)(23)- is associated with a potential drug interaction that can significantly decrease VPA serum concentration(24). One retrospective trial included 36 patients concluded that VPA mean ± SEM serum concentration dropped from 50.8 ± 4.5 µg/mL to 9.9 ± 2.1 µg/mL(P < .001) following meropenem administration with a mean decrease of 82.1% ± 2.7%(18), while a recent prospective observational trial determined that the mean drop in serum VPA level was 80% ranging from(49%-99%)(23). However, despite VPA toxicity with fatal events being reported for over 20 years, only a few case reports documented successful intentional use of meropenem as an antidote for VPA poisoning(25-27). To date, no randomized-controlled trials were conducted.
Specific aims: Determine if meropenem is effective in treating acute VPA toxicity, manifested by achieving reduced VPA plasma levels and/or enhanced mentation.
Hypothesis: Administration of meropenem combined with standard care is effective in managing VPA intoxication, affirmed by providing lower serum VPA concentrations and/or better level of consciousness; in contrast to standard care alone.
Background: VPA is an antiepileptic drug that has psychiatric indications as well(28). VPA acute intoxication is a critical condition listed among fatal pharmaceutical exposures, with CNS toxicity being the most common manifestation and may progress to respiratory depression and/or coma(5). In 2018, the American Association of Poison Control Centers (AAPCC) Toxic Exposure Surveillance System (TESS) database reported 7699 VPA exposures, of which: 2079 were treated in health care facilities, 87 resulted in major toxicity, and 19 resulted in deaths(29). These data denote that VPA poisoning is becoming an area of growing concern among toxicologists.
Supportive care and ensuring adequate airway protection are the cornerstone of treatment; yet, no drug specified as an antidote for managing VPA intoxication(5). Carbapenem antibiotics augment the clearance of VPA through suppressing its enterohepatic recirculation, as they inhibit the acylpeptide hydrolase enzyme responsible for the reabsorption of the hydrolyzed valproate back to VPA active molecule(21). Taking advantage of this well-established drug-drug interaction between VPA and carbapenems resulting in significant drop of VPA serum concentration during concomitant use(15,17,23), we propose that administration of meropenem (member of carbapenems group) will prove effectiveness in managing VPA toxicity by achieving lower plasma levels of VPA and/or enhanced alertness; compared with standard care.
Research design and methodology:
Operational definitions of research variables:
VPA toxicity: Ingestion of VPA, at doses higher than 60 mg/kg/day, with a serum VPA concentration above the therapeutic threshold of 100 µg/mL and/or altered sensorium.
Standard care: Encompasses supportive care: administration of IV fluids, endotracheal intubation for securing airway in patients with altered sensorium, benzodiazepines should be administered only if seizures occur and L-carnitine 100 mg/kg IV in cases of hyperammonemia.
Primary outcome: Evaluate serum VPA concentrations among the two study groups. Secondary outcome: Assess patients level of consciousness according to the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) among the placebo and treatment groups.
Study Design and Location: This is a multicentered, randomized (1:1), double blinded, placebo controlled study where eligible patients will be randomly assigned into two groups using simple random sample technique, each patient will either receive: IV meropenem 1gram every 8 hours together with standard care; or placebo along with standard care. Computer generated random number tables, will be used to allocate patients to either treatment or placebo groups. We will make the participant and the assessing physician unaware of the treatment. The study will be conducted in three poison control centers (PCC) in Egypt: (1) poison control center of Ain Shams university hospitals; (2) poison control center of Alexandria university hospitals; (3) poison control center of Tanta university hospitals. We will obtain their institutional review board and/or ethics committee approval to conduct the study protocol prior to study initiation.
Interventions and Monitoring: Serial VPA serum concentrations to be assessed every two to four hours until a steady significant declined level is noted, while neurological status assessment of patients will be performed according to the GCS three times daily.
Sample Size \& Power: Based on VPA toxicity levels, mean VPA serum level of 378.3 mg/mL ± 310.2 mg/mL were reported(7), following meropenem administration, the mean drop in serum VPA level was 80%(18,23). Owing to this data, we estimated that a minimum of 48 patients will be needed to confirm this effect (α= 5% and power of 90 %).
Study duration: Reviewing annual reports of PCCs in Egypt, a single PCC received 44 cases of VPA toxicity throughout the year 2011(30). Hence, an estimated one-year duration will be sufficient to conduct our study over three PCCs in Egypt.
Proposed statistical analysis: Data will be presented as mean ± standard deviation or median with interquartile range. Differences between the two groups will be tested using independent sample t-test or Mann-Whitney U-test. Univariate analysis for comparing different demographic data between meropenem group and placebo group using Chi square test and t-test as applicable, Linear regression will be used to adjust for confounders. The analysis will be carried out according to the intention to treat principle.
Differences will only be considered significant at P <0.05 and statistical analysis will be performed using the Stata statistical software, version 16.0.
Study Limitations: 1) VPA overdoses may occur among patients with history of epilepsy. Meropenem is a drug that possess seizure potential, but mainly seizures were reported in patients with history of epilepsy and patients with declined renal function. Meanwhile, overall seizure rate being 0.7% among immunocompetent patients (24). Meropenem dosage reduction is recommended in patients with advanced age and/or patients with renal impairment.
Compliance to the recommended dosage regimens in addition to bedside digital electroencephalogram (EEG) tracings will be urged in epileptic patients.
- The results of this study would only apply to patients with the study inclusion criteria, further studies should be conducted to cover the excluded criteria population.
Anticipated results: Meropenem with standard care will exhibit effectiveness in VPA toxicity treatment, by achieving lower mean serum concentrations of VPA and/or higher median GCS denoting improved sensorium; when compared with standard care alone.
- Conditions
- Drug Toxicity
- Being tested
- Meropenem Injection
- Keywords
- Valproic acid toxicity - Meropenem - Antidote
- Medical subject headings
- Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Meropenem InjectionDrug
Also called Supportive care as fluids and securing airway if needed
Administration Intravenous meropenem 1gram every 8 hours together with standard care;
.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Meropenem | Experimental | Meropenem 1 gram intravenous every 8 hours Receives: Drug: Meropenem Injection |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Placebo intravenous every 8 hours Receives: Drug: Meropenem Injection |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Evaluate serum Valproic acid concentrations among the two study groups.
Plasma level of valproic acid
Measured: 1 year
Secondary outcomes (1)
Assess patients level of consciousness according to the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) among the placebo and treatment groups. Assess patients level of consciousness according to the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) among the placebo and treatment groups.
Glasgow coma scale ranging from 3 (not responsive) to 15 (responsive)
Measured: 1 year
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted17 Dec 2020
- Study startJun 2021 (estimated)
- Primary completionJun 2022 (estimated)
- Study completionDec 2022 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Drug ToxicityStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider
- Enrolment
- 48 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Mabaret Al-Asafara Hospitals
- Sponsor type
- Research network
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Nancy Mohamed, Mabaret Al-Asafara Hospitals
- Investigators
- Nancy M Ahmed, MSc, Principal investigator, Clinical pharmacist
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04671589
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- N2014
- Status last verified
- Dec 2020
- First submitted
- 9 Dec 2020
- Last updated
- 17 Dec 2020
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 17 Dec 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Antidote for Valproic Acid Toxicity: a New Indication for Meropenem Antibiotic. A Randomized Placebo-controlled Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04671589
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- N2014
- Conditions
- Drug Toxicity
- Keywords
- Valproic acid toxicity - Meropenem - Antidote
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 48 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Mabaret Al-Asafara HospitalsResearch network
- Study start
- Jun 2021 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- Jun 2022 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Dec 2022 (estimated)
- First posted
- 17 Dec 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Acute Valproic acid (VPA) toxicity is an emergency condition which may commonly present with central nervous system (CNS) depression(5). In mild poisoning, associated with VPA ingestions of 200 mg/kg, sedation and lethargy commonly occur(6); while in severe VPA poisoning associated with ingestions of 400 mg/kg or more, life threatening events are likely to occur as respiratory depression, metabolic acidosis, encephalopathy, hemodynamic instability, and cerebral edema which may progress to coma and even death -if not treated promptly. Supportive care along with early gastric decontamination using activated charcoal (AC) (which may only be given if patient presented early after ingestion), in addition to intravenous (IV) administration of Levocarnitine (L-Carnitine) and ensuring adequate airway protection are the cornerstone of treatment, but there remains no drug listed as a specific antidote for acute VPA intoxication. Carbapenem antibiotics augment the clearance of VPA through suppressing its enterohepatic recirculation, as they inhibit the acylpeptide hydrolase enzyme responsible for the reabsorption of the hydrolyzed valproate back to VPA active molecule. Taking advantage of this well-established drug-drug interaction between VPA and carbapenems resulting in significant drop of VPA serum concentration during concomitant use, we propose that administration of meropenem (member of carbapenems group) will prove effectiveness in managing VPA toxicity by achieving lower plasma levels of VPA and/or enhanced alertness; compared with standard care.
Detailed description
JUSTIFICATION AND SIGNIFICANCE:
Valproic acid (VPA) -a branched chain carboxylic acid- introduced by the Food and Drug Administration in 1978 for the treatment of seizure disorders(1). In the following years, VPA gained further approved indications to treat bipolar and behavioral disorders(2), migraine prophylaxis(3) as well as other psychiatric indications(4).The growing use of VPA and its availability resulted in increased prevalence of VPA overdoses(5,6). The rising incidence of acute VPA toxicity is either resulting from suicidal attempts, accidental ingestions, or following VPA dose increments to achieve the desired therapeutic effect(7). Acute VPA toxicity is an emergency condition which may commonly present with central nervous system (CNS) depression(5). In mild poisoning, associated with VPA ingestions of 200 mg/kg, sedation and lethargy commonly occur(6); while in severe VPA poisoning associated with ingestions of 400 mg/kg or more, life threatening events are likely to occur as respiratory depression, metabolic acidosis, encephalopathy, hemodynamic instability, and cerebral edema which may progress to coma and even death -if not treated promptly(5,8). Serum VPA concentration is the most functional tool in diagnosing and determining the severity of toxicity. Supportive care along with early gastric decontamination using activated charcoal (AC) (which may only be given if patient presented early after ingestion), in addition to intravenous (IV) administration of Levocarnitine (L-Carnitine) and ensuring adequate airway protection are the cornerstone of treatment, but there remains no drug listed as a specific antidote for acute VPA intoxication(5,9).
Carbapenems are a group of β-lactam antibiotics with a growing need to use in the empiric and definitive treatment, due to the emerging resistance to antibiotics(10). A multitude of case reports(11-13), retrospective observational studies(14-19) and reviews(20-22) demonstrated that combined use of VPA and carbapenem antibiotics -mainly meropenem (16)(23)- is associated with a potential drug interaction that can significantly decrease VPA serum concentration(24). One retrospective trial included 36 patients concluded that VPA mean ± SEM serum concentration dropped from 50.8 ± 4.5 µg/mL to 9.9 ± 2.1 µg/mL(P < .001) following meropenem administration with a mean decrease of 82.1% ± 2.7%(18), while a recent prospective observational trial determined that the mean drop in serum VPA level was 80% ranging from(49%-99%)(23). However, despite VPA toxicity with fatal events being reported for over 20 years, only a few case reports documented successful intentional use of meropenem as an antidote for VPA poisoning(25-27). To date, no randomized-controlled trials were conducted.
Specific aims: Determine if meropenem is effective in treating acute VPA toxicity, manifested by achieving reduced VPA plasma levels and/or enhanced mentation.
Hypothesis: Administration of meropenem combined with standard care is effective in managing VPA intoxication, affirmed by providing lower serum VPA concentrations and/or better level of consciousness; in contrast to standard care alone.
Background: VPA is an antiepileptic drug that has psychiatric indications as well(28). VPA acute intoxication is a critical condition listed among fatal pharmaceutical exposures, with CNS toxicity being the most common manifestation and may progress to respiratory depression and/or coma(5). In 2018, the American Association of Poison Control Centers (AAPCC) Toxic Exposure Surveillance System (TESS) database reported 7699 VPA exposures, of which: 2079 were treated in health care facilities, 87 resulted in major toxicity, and 19 resulted in deaths(29). These data denote that VPA poisoning is becoming an area of growing concern among toxicologists.
Supportive care and ensuring adequate airway protection are the cornerstone of treatment; yet, no drug specified as an antidote for managing VPA intoxication(5). Carbapenem antibiotics augment the clearance of VPA through suppressing its enterohepatic recirculation, as they inhibit the acylpeptide hydrolase enzyme responsible for the reabsorption of the hydrolyzed valproate back to VPA active molecule(21). Taking advantage of this well-established drug-drug interaction between VPA and carbapenems resulting in significant drop of VPA serum concentration during concomitant use(15,17,23), we propose that administration of meropenem (member of carbapenems group) will prove effectiveness in managing VPA toxicity by achieving lower plasma levels of VPA and/or enhanced alertness; compared with standard care.
Research design and methodology:
Operational definitions of research variables:
VPA toxicity: Ingestion of VPA, at doses higher than 60 mg/kg/day, with a serum VPA concentration above the therapeutic threshold of 100 µg/mL and/or altered sensorium.
Standard care: Encompasses supportive care: administration of IV fluids, endotracheal intubation for securing airway in patients with altered sensorium, benzodiazepines should be administered only if seizures occur and L-carnitine 100 mg/kg IV in cases of hyperammonemia.
Primary outcome: Evaluate serum VPA concentrations among the two study groups. Secondary outcome: Assess patients level of consciousness according to the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) among the placebo and treatment groups.
Study Design and Location: This is a multicentered, randomized (1:1), double blinded, placebo controlled study where eligible patients will be randomly assigned into two groups using simple random sample technique, each patient will either receive: IV meropenem 1gram every 8 hours together with standard care; or placebo along with standard care. Computer generated random number tables, will be used to allocate patients to either treatment or placebo groups. We will make the participant and the assessing physician unaware of the treatment. The study will be conducted in three poison control centers (PCC) in Egypt: (1) poison control center of Ain Shams university hospitals; (2) poison control center of Alexandria university hospitals; (3) poison control center of Tanta university hospitals. We will obtain their institutional review board and/or ethics committee approval to conduct the study protocol prior to study initiation.
Interventions and Monitoring: Serial VPA serum concentrations to be assessed every two to four hours until a steady significant declined level is noted, while neurological status assessment of patients will be performed according to the GCS three times daily.
Sample Size \& Power: Based on VPA toxicity levels, mean VPA serum level of 378.3 mg/mL ± 310.2 mg/mL were reported(7), following meropenem administration, the mean drop in serum VPA level was 80%(18,23). Owing to this data, we estimated that a minimum of 48 patients will be needed to confirm this effect (α= 5% and power of 90 %).
Study duration: Reviewing annual reports of PCCs in Egypt, a single PCC received 44 cases of VPA toxicity throughout the year 2011(30). Hence, an estimated one-year duration will be sufficient to conduct our study over three PCCs in Egypt.
Proposed statistical analysis: Data will be presented as mean ± standard deviation or median with interquartile range. Differences between the two groups will be tested using independent sample t-test or Mann-Whitney U-test. Univariate analysis for comparing different demographic data between meropenem group and placebo group using Chi square test and t-test as applicable, Linear regression will be used to adjust for confounders. The analysis will be carried out according to the intention to treat principle.
Differences will only be considered significant at P <0.05 and statistical analysis will be performed using the Stata statistical software, version 16.0.
Study Limitations: 1) VPA overdoses may occur among patients with history of epilepsy. Meropenem is a drug that possess seizure potential, but mainly seizures were reported in patients with history of epilepsy and patients with declined renal function. Meanwhile, overall seizure rate being 0.7% among immunocompetent patients (24). Meropenem dosage reduction is recommended in patients with advanced age and/or patients with renal impairment.
Compliance to the recommended dosage regimens in addition to bedside digital electroencephalogram (EEG) tracings will be urged in epileptic patients.
- The results of this study would only apply to patients with the study inclusion criteria, further studies should be conducted to cover the excluded criteria population.
Anticipated results: Meropenem with standard care will exhibit effectiveness in VPA toxicity treatment, by achieving lower mean serum concentrations of VPA and/or higher median GCS denoting improved sensorium; when compared with standard care alone.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, care provider)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Meropenem | Experimental | Drug: Meropenem InjectionMeropenem 1 gram intravenous every 8 hours |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Drug: Meropenem InjectionPlacebo intravenous every 8 hours |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Patients with VPA toxicity will be included if aged 18 years or more. The patient himself/herself should provide informed consent; a family member may take place only if there is an altered mentation that may hinder such procedure.
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Patients will be excluded if presenting one hour following VPA ingestion and were administered AC for gastric decontamination, as it may decrease VPA bioavailability.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Meropenem InjectionAlso: Supportive care as fluids and securing airway if neededAdministration Intravenous meropenem 1gram every 8 hours together with standard care; . | Drug | Meropenem, Placebo |
Primary outcome
Evaluate serum Valproic acid concentrations among the two study groups.
Time frame: 1 year
Plasma level of valproic acid
1 secondary outcome
Assess patients level of consciousness according to the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) among the placebo and treatment groups. Assess patients level of consciousness according to the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) among the placebo and treatment groups.
Time frame: 1 year
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 17 Dec 2020.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Drug Toxicity
RecruitingObservational study
3D Versus 2D Strain Echocardiography for Early Detection of Cardiotoxicity During Cancer Therapy
Cancer Related Cardiovascular Toxicity, Anthracycline Related Cardiotoxicity in Breast Cancer
Not yet recruitingObservational study
PAtient Similarity for Decision-Making in Prevention of Cardiovascular Toxicity (PACT): A Feasibility Study
Heart Failure, Coronary Artery Disease
Not yet recruiting
Feasibility Study of Huangqi Yangyuan Formula for Capecitabine-Induced Adverse Reactions in Advanced Colorectal Cancer
Advanced Colorectal Cancer, Capecitabine-Related Adverse Reaction
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Infliximab for Treatment of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Colitis
Melanoma Stage III, Melanoma Stage IV
RecruitingPhase 3
S1501 Dual Observational and Randomized Cohort Study of Patients With Metastatic HER-2+ Breast Cancer at Risk of Cardiac Toxicity
Cardiotoxicity, HER2/Neu Positive
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Nancy M Ahmed, MSc principal investigator
Clinical pharmacist
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Meropenem Injection in people with Drug Toxicity, run by Mabaret Al-Asafara Hospitals at 1 site in Egypt.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Dec 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Egypt. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Nancy M Ahmed, MSc (01005607730, dr.nancymohamed@gmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Evaluate serum Valproic acid concentrations among the two study groups. (time frame: 1 year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Dec 2020.