AzTrials
AzTrials

Rectal CancerNCT04673526

Laparoscopic Intersphincteric Resection in Elderly Patients

A study testing Laparoscopic intersphincteric resection and Laparoscopic abdomino-perineal procedures in people with Rectal Cancer, run by ASL Verbano Cusio Ossola at 1 site in Italy.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The aim of the present study is to assess if it is possible to offer intersphincteric rectal resection (IRR) to selected patients older than 70 years affected by ultra-low rectal cancer. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 70 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Rectal Cancer
What is being tested?
Laparoscopic intersphincteric resection and Laparoscopic abdomino-perineal procedures
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
400 participants
Where
1 siteItaly
Study dates
1 Jan 2009to 31 Dec 2016
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 70 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients over 70 years old who were affected by rectal cancer sited lower than 5 cm from anal verge and refused abdomen-perineal treatment.

Who cannot join

  • Cancer extension over internal sphincteric muscle (T4) evaluated through MRI during staging work out;
  • diabetic neuropathy conditioning previous partial/total incontinence;
  • other pre-existing pathological condition affecting faecal incontinence.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Italy1 site
  • Sandro Zonta

    Domodossola, VCO, 28845

Other trials in Italy

About this study

Official title: Laparoscopic Intersphincteric Resection for Ultra Low Rectal Cancer in Elderly Patients: Oncological and Functional Lon Term Outcome. A Prospective Case Control Study.

The aim of the present study is to assess if it is possible to offer intersphincteric rectal resection (IRR) to selected patients older than 70 years affected by ultra-low rectal cancer. The study, involving patients with rectal cancer at less than 5 cm from the anal verge, will compare elderly patients refusing standard sphincteric demolition and undergoing IRR, with some control groups (younger patients undergoing IRR, >70 years old patients undergoing abdominoperineal resection + colostomy in left iliac fossa, >70 years old patients undergoing abdominoperineal resection + perineal colostomy). The groups will be compared in terms of quality of life, quality of life associated to incontinence, overall survival, disease free survival and post-operative complications. This will be helpful to identify conditions for extending IRR to elderly patients. The study is run by Colo-rectal Surgery Unit at Policlinico San Matteo in Pavia (Italy) from 2009 to 2016, directly led by Dr. Sandro Zonta (principal investigator) and funded by the hospital itself.

Conditions
Rectal Cancer
Being tested
Laparoscopic intersphincteric resection, Laparoscopic abdomino-perineal procedures
Keywords
intersphincteric resection, elderly, rectal cancer
Medical subject headings
Rectal Neoplasms

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Laparoscopic intersphincteric resectionProcedure or surgery

    Laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for ultra low rectal cancer in elderly patients

  • Laparoscopic abdomino-perineal proceduresProcedure or surgery

    Abdominoperineal resection + colostomy in left iliac fossa or perineum

Study groups in NCT04673526
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Intersphincteric resectionExperimentalAfter a laparoscopic TME (total mesorectal excision) is carried out down to the elevator ani plane and the anorectal junction, the intersphincteric plane is dissected, opening the space between puborectalis muscle and interior sphincter. Margin of resection is at least 1 cm below the lower margin of the tumor. Rectal excision is completed with transanal circumferential dissection and after specimen extraction through the anus, a colo-anal hand sewn anastomosis is fashioned.
Receives: Procedure: Laparoscopic intersphincteric resection
Abdomen-perineal proceduresActive comparatorAfter identification of the elevator ani plane, the descendent colon is transected with a linear stapler and a terminal stoma is fashioned. Then, a circumferential incision is made around anal orifice and perineal dissection is performed circumferentially to the pelvic cavity. Perineal defect is repaired performing mono-lateral or bilateral inferior gluteal flap.
Receives: Procedure: Laparoscopic abdomino-perineal procedures

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Quality of life of operated patients as assessed by Quality of Life Short Form Health Survey (QoL SF-36)

    QoL SF-36 score (Quality of Life Short Form Health Survey from 0 to 100, with the lower score the more disability)

    Measured: 6 months after discharge

  2. Quality of life associated to incontinence as assessed by Wexner incontinence score (WiS)

    WiS (Wexner incontinence score) from 0 to 20: higher score means worse incontinence

    Measured: 6 months after discharge

  3. Quality of life associated to incontinence as assessed by Faecal incontinence quality of life scale (FIQL)

    FIQL (Faecal incontinence quality of life scale): 29 items from 1 to 6 - the lower value the worse quality of life

    Measured: 6 months after discharge

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Patients' survival

    months

    Measured: 5 years

  2. Disease free survival

    months

    Measured: 5 years

  3. Post-operative complications

    Clavien-Dindo score from grade I (minor complications) to grade V (death)

    Measured: 6 months after discharge

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted17 Dec 2020
  2. Study start1 Jan 2009
  3. Primary completion31 Dec 2016
  4. Study completion31 Dec 2016

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Prospective case-control study
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
400 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04673526
Sponsor's protocol ID
Lap IRR 70+
Status last verified
Dec 2020
First submitted
19 Nov 2020
Last updated
22 Dec 2020
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Laparoscopic intersphincteric resection and Laparoscopic abdomino-perineal procedures in people with Rectal Cancer, run by ASL Verbano Cusio Ossola at 1 site in Italy.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 Dec 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Quality of life of operated patients as assessed by Quality of Life Short Form Health Survey (QoL SF-36) (time frame: 6 months after discharge). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 Dec 2020.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in