Lung CancerN2-3SNCT04677205
Molecular Signature From Tumor to Lymph Nodes
An observational study of Lung Cancer and Stage IIIA-cN2, run by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris at 12 sites in France.
Trial summary
Mediastinal lymph node (LN) involvement (N2) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) concerns 15% of resectable tumors and is associated with a poor prognosis and an overall survival reaching 9 to 49%. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Lung Cancer, Stage IIIA-cN2, Operated With Curative Intent
- How many people
- 200 participants
- Where
- 12 sitesFrance
- Study dates
- 30 Mar 2021to Nov 2027
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: 230 patients in 11 French centers in order to have 200 eligible patients. Objectives are 120 patients recruited retrospectively and 110 prospectively. Inclusion criteria are: all consecutive patients operated with a curative intent for an IIIA-cN2 NSCLC.
Who may be able to join
- Adult patient, men and women age >18 years
- Patients operated with a curative intent for an IIIA-cN2 NSCLC
- Social security affiliation
- Written informed consent for patient included in part 2 (prospective) or not opposing the use of this data for patient included in part 1 (retrospective)
Who cannot join
- Patient with T4, R1 or R2 surgical resection, sublobar resection, no radical lymphadenectomy
- Patient under protectives measures
- Pregnancy or breast-feeding
Trial locations and contacts
12 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
12 sites in 1 country
France12 sites, 11 recruiting
- Not yet recruiting
Hôpital du Haut-Lévêque, CHU de Bordeaux
Bordeaux
Jacques JOUGON, Pr
- Not yet recruiting
Hôpital Militaire Percy
Clamart
Bertrand GRAND, Dr
- Not yet recruiting
Hôpital Nord
Marseille
Pascal THOMAS, Pr
- Not yet recruiting
Hôpital Pasteur, CHU de Nice
Nice
Jérome MOUROUX, Pr
- Active, not recruiting
Hegp-Aphp
Paris, 75015
- Recruiting
Hôpital Européen Georges-Pompidou
Paris, 75015
Françoise LE PIMPEC-BARTHES, Pr
- Not yet recruiting
Hôpital Bichat
Paris
Pierre MORDANT, Dr
- Not yet recruiting
Hôpital Cochin
Paris
Marco ALIFANO, Pr
- Not yet recruiting
Hôpital Pontchaillou, CHU de Rennes
Rennes
Bertrand RICHARD DE LA TOUR, PR
- Not yet recruiting
Hôpitaux universitaires de Strasbourg
Strasbourg
MASSARD Gilbert, Pr
- Not yet recruiting
Hôpital Larrey, CHU de Toulouse
Toulouse
Laurent BROUCHET, Pr
- Not yet recruiting
CHRU de Tours
Tours
Antoine LEGRAS, Dr
About this study
Official title: Molecular Signature From Tumor to Lymph Nodes: How to Identify the Right Candidate for IIIA-N2 Lung Cancer Surgery?
Mediastinal lymph node (LN) involvement (N2) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) concerns 15% of resectable tumors and is associated with a poor prognosis and an overall survival reaching 9 to 49%. Literature fails to provide any definitive consensus regarding the management of these patients, except for the platinum-based doublet chemotherapy. The N2 involvement remains a matter of debate because of its not yet well-classified heterogeneity. Regarding anatomy, the Mountain and Dresler's regional LN classification for lung cancer staging remains the reference. Different studies classified IIIA-N2 disease into 4 groups, in addition to the skip-N2 phenomenon: minimal-N2, N2 single station, N2 multiple stations, and bulky-N2. Other subgroups were recently proposed for the 8th edition of the TNM: N2a1 - single station skip, N2a2 - single station non-skip, N2b - multiple stations.
The French National Cancer Institute (INCa) proposed guidelines, but in case of cN2 staging without mediastinal infiltration, guidelines remained imprecise ("resectability should be discussed for each case") and suggested surgery first, or induction chemotherapy, or concomitant chemoradiation.
Thus, optimal management of cIIIA-N2 remains controversial but complete tumor resection can be related to long-term survival in some patients, including 10 years after surgery [1]. In this situation, the identification of markers that will help select IIIA-N2 patients who will benefit from surgical resection is mandatory.
Read the detailed description
We planned a comprehensive molecular characterization of tumors and lymph nodes to evaluate the impact of molecular signatures and molecular heterogeneity on disease-free survival after surgery in IIIA-N2 NSCLC patients. Identification of specific molecular profiles in primary tumors and evolution profiles in nodes might provide clues to the potential risk of metastatic evolution and trigger specific management.
For patients included prospectively, we planned to analyze cell free circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) as prognostic marker. Because multiple biopsies are not always available in care settings, ctDNA could also be analyzed as a surrogate marker of molecular heterogeneity. Next generation sequencing (NGS) that was validated in our lab to screen ctDNA using a specific bio-informatics workflow allows accurate and cost effective ctDNA screening
- Conditions
- Lung Cancer, Stage IIIA-cN2, Operated With Curative Intent, Primary Tumor Tissue Available, Node Tumor Tissue Available
- Keywords
- NSCLC, N2, molecular profile, prognosis
- Medical subject headings
- Lung Neoplasms
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
3-year disease-free survival
To identify a molecular signature based on a comprehensive molecular analysis at genomic and transcriptomic levels linked to 3-year disease-free survival in resected IIIA-N2 NSCLC.
Measured: 3 years
Secondary outcomes (4)
5-year disease-free survival
To identify a molecular signature based on a comprehensive molecular analysis at genomic and transcriptomic levels linked to 5-year disease-free survival in resected IIIA-N2 NSCLC.
Measured: 5 years
pathological architectural patterns WHO 2015 classification
To evaluate the impact of the pathological architectural patterns WHO 2015 classification on the 5-year cancer-specific survival and the 5-year overall survival
Measured: 5 years
anatomical lymphatic spread
To identify tumor molecular patterns associated with specific anatomical lymphatic spread subgroups.
Measured: at the end of molecular analyses
ctDNA
To assess ctDNA prognostic impact, before and after surgery.
Measured: 3 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted21 Dec 2020
- Study start30 Mar 2021
- Primary completionNov 2023 (estimated)
- Study completionNov 2027 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (8)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Lung CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Cross-sectional
- Enrolment
- 200 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Cancer Institute, France, Ministry of Health, France, Université de Paris
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Helene BLONS, PharmD PhD, Principal investigator, Hôpital Européen Georges-Pompidou
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04677205
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- D20180155
- Other IDs
- D20180155, 2019-A02635-52
- Acronym
- N2-3S
- Status last verified
- Jan 2023
- First submitted
- 15 Dec 2020
- Last updated
- 9 Jan 2023
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Individual participant data (IPD) that underlie results in publication could be shared. IPD detailed in the protocol of a planned metaanalysis could be shared.
Publications
Altman DG, McShane LM, Sauerbrei W, Taube SE. Reporting recommendations for tumor marker prognostic studies (REMARK): explanation and elaboration. BMC Med. 2012 May 29;10:51. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-10-51.
PubMed 22642691Legras A, Mordant P, Arame A, Foucault C, Dujon A, Le Pimpec Barthes F, Riquet M. Long-term survival of patients with pN2 lung cancer according to the pattern of lymphatic spread. Ann Thorac Surg. 2014 Apr;97(4):1156-62. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.12.047. Epub 2014 Feb 26.
PubMed 24582052Lin IF, Chang WP, Liao YN. Shrinkage methods enhanced the accuracy of parameter estimation using Cox models with small number of events. J Clin Epidemiol. 2013 Jul;66(7):743-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.02.002. Epub 2013 Apr 6.
PubMed 23566374Pecuchet N, Rozenholc Y, Zonta E, Pietrasz D, Didelot A, Combe P, Gibault L, Bachet JB, Taly V, Fabre E, Blons H, Laurent-Puig P. Analysis of Base-Position Error Rate of Next-Generation Sequencing to Detect Tumor Mutations in Circulating DNA. Clin Chem. 2016 Nov;62(11):1492-1503. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2016.258236. Epub 2016 Sep 13.
PubMed 27624137Peduzzi P, Concato J, Feinstein AR, Holford TR. Importance of events per independent variable in proportional hazards regression analysis. II. Accuracy and precision of regression estimates. J Clin Epidemiol. 1995 Dec;48(12):1503-10. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(95)00048-8.
PubMed 8543964Tapak L, Saidijam M, Sadeghifar M, Poorolajal J, Mahjub H. Competing risks data analysis with high-dimensional covariates: an application in bladder cancer. Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics. 2015 Jun;13(3):169-76. doi: 10.1016/j.gpb.2015.04.001. Epub 2015 Apr 20.
PubMed 25907251Um SW, Joung JG, Lee H, Kim H, Kim KT, Park J, Hayes DN, Park WY. Molecular Evolution Patterns in Metastatic Lymph Nodes Reflect the Differential Treatment Response of Advanced Primary Lung Cancer. Cancer Res. 2016 Nov 15;76(22):6568-6576. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-16-0873. Epub 2016 Sep 13.
PubMed 27634761Vittinghoff E, McCulloch CE. Relaxing the rule of ten events per variable in logistic and Cox regression. Am J Epidemiol. 2007 Mar 15;165(6):710-8. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwk052. Epub 2006 Dec 20.
PubMed 17182981
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 9 Jan 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Molecular Signature From Tumor to Lymph Nodes: How to Identify the Right Candidate for IIIA-N2 Lung Cancer Surgery?
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04677205
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- N2-3S / D20180155
- Conditions
- Lung Cancer, Stage IIIA-cN2, Operated With Curative Intent, Primary Tumor Tissue Available, Node Tumor Tissue Available
- Keywords
- NSCLC, N2, molecular profile, prognosis
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 200 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Cancer Institute, France, Ministry of Health, France, Université de Paris
- Study start
- 30 Mar 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Nov 2023 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Nov 2027 (estimated)
- First posted
- 21 Dec 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Mediastinal lymph node (LN) involvement (N2) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) concerns 15% of resectable tumors and is associated with a poor prognosis and an overall survival reaching 9 to 49%. Literature fails to provide any definitive consensus regarding the management of these patients, except for the platinum-based doublet chemotherapy. The N2 involvement remains a matter of debate because of its not yet well-classified heterogeneity. Regarding anatomy, the Mountain and Dresler's regional LN classification for lung cancer staging remains the reference. Different studies classified IIIA-N2 disease into 4 groups, in addition to the skip-N2 phenomenon: minimal-N2, N2 single station, N2 multiple stations, and bulky-N2. Other subgroups were recently proposed for the 8th edition of the TNM: N2a1 - single station skip, N2a2 - single station non-skip, N2b - multiple stations.
The French National Cancer Institute (INCa) proposed guidelines, but in case of cN2 staging without mediastinal infiltration, guidelines remained imprecise ("resectability should be discussed for each case") and suggested surgery first, or induction chemotherapy, or concomitant chemoradiation.
Thus, optimal management of cIIIA-N2 remains controversial but complete tumor resection can be related to long-term survival in some patients, including 10 years after surgery [1]. In this situation, the identification of markers that will help select IIIA-N2 patients who will benefit from surgical resection is mandatory.
Detailed description
We planned a comprehensive molecular characterization of tumors and lymph nodes to evaluate the impact of molecular signatures and molecular heterogeneity on disease-free survival after surgery in IIIA-N2 NSCLC patients. Identification of specific molecular profiles in primary tumors and evolution profiles in nodes might provide clues to the potential risk of metastatic evolution and trigger specific management.
For patients included prospectively, we planned to analyze cell free circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) as prognostic marker. Because multiple biopsies are not always available in care settings, ctDNA could also be analyzed as a surrogate marker of molecular heterogeneity. Next generation sequencing (NGS) that was validated in our lab to screen ctDNA using a specific bio-informatics workflow allows accurate and cost effective ctDNA screening
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Cross-sectional
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- 230 patients in 11 French centers in order to have 200 eligible patients. Objectives are 120 patients recruited retrospectively and 110 prospectively. Inclusion criteria are: all consecutive patients operated with a curative intent for an IIIA-cN2 NSCLC.
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Adult patient, men and women age >18 years
- Patients operated with a curative intent for an IIIA-cN2 NSCLC
- Social security affiliation
- Written informed consent for patient included in part 2 (prospective) or not opposing the use of this data for patient included in part 1 (retrospective)
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Patient with T4, R1 or R2 surgical resection, sublobar resection, no radical lymphadenectomy
- Patient under protectives measures
- Pregnancy or breast-feeding
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
3-year disease-free survival
Time frame: 3 years
To identify a molecular signature based on a comprehensive molecular analysis at genomic and transcriptomic levels linked to 3-year disease-free survival in resected IIIA-N2 NSCLC.
4 secondary outcomes
5-year disease-free survival
Time frame: 5 years
pathological architectural patterns WHO 2015 classification
Time frame: 5 years
anatomical lymphatic spread
Time frame: at the end of molecular analyses
ctDNA
Time frame: 3 years
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 9 Jan 2023.
- Background: PubMed 22642691Altman DG, McShane LM, Sauerbrei W, Taube SE. Reporting recommendations for tumor marker prognostic studies (REMARK): explanation and elaboration. BMC Med. 2012 May 29;10:51. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-10-51.
- Background: PubMed 24582052Legras A, Mordant P, Arame A, Foucault C, Dujon A, Le Pimpec Barthes F, Riquet M. Long-term survival of patients with pN2 lung cancer according to the pattern of lymphatic spread. Ann Thorac Surg. 2014 Apr;97(4):1156-62. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.12.047. Epub 2014 Feb 26.
- Background: PubMed 23566374Lin IF, Chang WP, Liao YN. Shrinkage methods enhanced the accuracy of parameter estimation using Cox models with small number of events. J Clin Epidemiol. 2013 Jul;66(7):743-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.02.002. Epub 2013 Apr 6.
- Background: PubMed 27624137Pecuchet N, Rozenholc Y, Zonta E, Pietrasz D, Didelot A, Combe P, Gibault L, Bachet JB, Taly V, Fabre E, Blons H, Laurent-Puig P. Analysis of Base-Position Error Rate of Next-Generation Sequencing to Detect Tumor Mutations in Circulating DNA. Clin Chem. 2016 Nov;62(11):1492-1503. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2016.258236. Epub 2016 Sep 13.
- Background: PubMed 8543964Peduzzi P, Concato J, Feinstein AR, Holford TR. Importance of events per independent variable in proportional hazards regression analysis. II. Accuracy and precision of regression estimates. J Clin Epidemiol. 1995 Dec;48(12):1503-10. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(95)00048-8.
- Background: PubMed 25907251Tapak L, Saidijam M, Sadeghifar M, Poorolajal J, Mahjub H. Competing risks data analysis with high-dimensional covariates: an application in bladder cancer. Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics. 2015 Jun;13(3):169-76. doi: 10.1016/j.gpb.2015.04.001. Epub 2015 Apr 20.
- Background: PubMed 27634761Um SW, Joung JG, Lee H, Kim H, Kim KT, Park J, Hayes DN, Park WY. Molecular Evolution Patterns in Metastatic Lymph Nodes Reflect the Differential Treatment Response of Advanced Primary Lung Cancer. Cancer Res. 2016 Nov 15;76(22):6568-6576. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-16-0873. Epub 2016 Sep 13.
- Background: PubMed 17182981Vittinghoff E, McCulloch CE. Relaxing the rule of ten events per variable in logistic and Cox regression. Am J Epidemiol. 2007 Mar 15;165(6):710-8. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwk052. Epub 2006 Dec 20.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Individual participant data (IPD) that underlie results in publication could be shared. IPD detailed in the protocol of a planned metaanalysis could be shared.
Related trials for Lung Cancer
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Study of INBRX-106 and INBRX-106 in Combination With Pembrolizumab (Keytruda®) in Subjects With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors (Hexavalent OX40 Agonist)
Solid Tumor, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
RecruitingObservational study
A Prospective ,Multicenter ,Non-interventional ,Real-world Study Observing Changes in Molecular Markers Osimertinib Targeted Therapy in EGFRm NSCLC
Non Small Cell Lung Cancer
Active, not recruiting
Streamlined Geriatric and Oncological Evaluation Based On IC Technology
Breast Cancer, Comorbidities and Coexisting Conditions
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study Evaluating Sotorasib Platinum Doublet Combination Versus Pembrolizumab Platinum Doublet Combination as a Front-Line Therapy in Participants With Stage IV or Advanced Stage IIIB/C Nonsquamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancers (CodeBreaK 202)
Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Datopotamab Deruxtecan (Dato-DXd, DS-1062a) in Advanced and/or Unresectable Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Metastatic Lung Cancer, Advanced Non Small Cell Lung Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Helene BLONS, PharmD PhD principal investigator
Hôpital Européen Georges-Pompidou
12 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Lung Cancer and Stage IIIA-cN2, run by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris at 12 sites in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Jan 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 12 sites in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Antoine LEGRAS, MD PhD (33 2 47474747, antlegras@gmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
3-year disease-free survival (time frame: 3 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04677205, which also lists 8 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Jan 2023.