InfluenzaAFIX-OBNCT04678271
Assessment, Feedback, Incentive, Exchange (AFIX OB) A Customizable Quality Improvement Intervention to Increase Maternal Vaccine Uptake
A study testing AFIX-OB Quality Improvement Package in people with Influenza and Whooping Cough, run by Yale University at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the AFIX-OB model to determine its impact on the change in flu and pertussis (Tdap) uptake, provider knowledge, attitudes and beliefs, and patient knowledge, attitudes and beliefs regarding maternal vaccination. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 50 years, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Influenza, Whooping Cough
- What is being tested?
- AFIX-OB Quality Improvement Package
- Type of treatment
- Vaccines, Pill or oral medicine, Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 202 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 1 Jul 2021to 31 Jan 2023
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 50 years
- Women only
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Between 18-50 years of age
- Currently pregnant and gestational age <26 weeks
Who cannot join
- Already enrolled in the study
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Yale New Haven Hospital
New Haven, Connecticut, 06512
About this study
Official title: Assessment, Feedback, Incentive, Exchange (AFIX-OB) A Customizable Quality Improvement Intervention to Increase Maternal Vaccine Uptake
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the AFIX-OB model to determine its impact on the change in flu and pertussis (Tdap) uptake, provider knowledge, attitudes and beliefs, and patient knowledge, attitudes and beliefs regarding maternal vaccination. The structure of the model and quality improvement interventions are guided by theory including the elaboration likelihood model and P3 model. These quality improvement measures will be implemented in OB clinics within the Yale New Haven Health System.
- Conditions
- Influenza, Whooping Cough
- Being tested
- AFIX-OB Quality Improvement Package
- Keywords
- Pregnancy, Vaccination, Vaccine Acceptance, Influenza, Pertussis, Tdap
- Medical subject headings
- Influenza, Human, Whooping Cough
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
AFIX-OB Quality Improvement PackageBehavioural
Practices randomized to the intervention arm will be provided with a package of core and supplemental quality improvement interventions to choose from so that the most effective combination for their practice is implemented. Each practice will be required to implement a tablet-based educational app for patients, and evidence based online educational module for providers, standing order protocol, and a reminder/recall protocol. They can then choose to also use flyers and posters in their waiting rooms, standardized talking points for maternal immunization for the providers, educational content for the practice website, and laminated and highlighted CDC Vaccine Information Sheets. The recruited patients and providers at the practice will be given a baseline and follow-up survey to assess their knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs towards maternal immunization.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| AFIX-OB Intervention Arm | Experimental | Practices randomized to this arm will choose from a suite of quality improvement interventions that address patient, provider, and practice-level factors relating to maternal vaccination. Receives: Behavioral: AFIX-OB Quality Improvement Package |
| Control Arm | No intervention | Practices randomized to this arm will continue to provide their normal standard of care to pregnant patients at their practice. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in Maternal Influenza Uptake
Immunization rates for each practice will be collected through JDAT or a random chart review.
Measured: Baseline and one year after implementation
Change in Maternal Tdap Uptake
Immunization rates for each practice will be collected through JDAT or a random chart review.
Measured: Baseline and one year after implementation
Secondary outcomes (6)
Change in Patient Vaccine Knowledge
Data on patient knowledge regarding vaccines will be collected from enrolled participants at the beginning of the study and following the implementation of the intervention via a 10-15 minute survey.
Measured: Baseline and one year after implementation
Change in Provider Vaccine Knowledge
Providers in both study arms will complete baseline and follow-up surveys pre-and post-intervention.
Measured: Baseline and one year after implementation
Change in Patient Vaccine Attitudes
Data on patient attitudes regarding vaccines will be collected from enrolled participants at the beginning of the study and following the implementation of the intervention via a 10-15 minute survey.
Measured: Baseline and one year after implementation
Change in Patient Vaccine Beliefs
Data on patient beliefs regarding vaccines will be collected from enrolled participants at the beginning of the study and following the implementation of the intervention via a 10-15 minute survey.
Measured: Baseline and one year after implementation
Change in Provider Vaccine Beliefs
Providers in both study arms will complete baseline and follow-up surveys pre-and post-intervention.
Measured: Baseline and one year after implementation
Change in Provider Vaccine Attitudes
Providers in both study arms will complete baseline and follow-up surveys pre-and post-intervention.
Measured: Baseline and one year after implementation
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted21 Dec 2020
- Study start1 Jul 2021
- Primary completion30 Sep 2022
- Study completion31 Jan 2023
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (10)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for InfluenzaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Yale UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 202 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Yale University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04678271
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2000027357
- Other IDs
- 1U01IP001110-01
- Acronym
- AFIX-OB
- Status last verified
- Sep 2023
- First submitted
- 16 Dec 2020
- Last updated
- 21 Sep 2023
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
LeBaron CW, Mercer JT, Massoudi MS, Dini E, Stevenson J, Fischer WM, Loy H, Quick LS, Warming JC, Tormey P, DesVignes-Kendrick M. Changes in clinic vaccination coverage after institution of measurement and feedback in 4 states and 2 cities. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1999 Aug;153(8):879-86. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.153.8.879.
PubMed 10437765Chamberlain AT, Seib K, Ault KA, Rosenberg ES, Frew PM, Cortes M, Whitney EA, Berkelman RL, Orenstein WA, Omer SB. Improving influenza and Tdap vaccination during pregnancy: A cluster-randomized trial of a multi-component antenatal vaccine promotion package in late influenza season. Vaccine. 2015 Jul 9;33(30):3571-9. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.05.048. Epub 2015 Jun 1.
PubMed 26044495Dini EF, Chaney M, Moolenaar RL, LeBaron CW. Information as intervention: how Georgia used vaccination coverage data to double public sector vaccination coverage in seven years. J Public Health Manag Pract. 1996 Winter;2(1):45-9. doi: 10.1097/00124784-199600210-00008.
PubMed 10186655Fairbrother G, Hanson KL, Friedman S, Butts GC. The impact of physician bonuses, enhanced fees, and feedback on childhood immunization coverage rates. Am J Public Health. 1999 Feb;89(2):171-5. doi: 10.2105/ajph.89.2.171.
PubMed 9949744Frew PM, Murden R, Mehta CC, Chamberlain AT, Hinman AR, Nowak G, Mendel J, Aikin A, Randall LA, Hargreaves AL, Omer SB, Orenstein WA, Bednarczyk RA. Development of a US trust measure to assess and monitor parental confidence in the vaccine system. Vaccine. 2019 Jan 7;37(2):325-332. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.09.043. Epub 2018 Nov 30.
PubMed 30503657Kahn KE, Black CL, Ding H, Williams WW, Lu PJ, Fiebelkorn AP, Havers F, D'Angelo DV, Ball S, Fink RV, Devlin R. Influenza and Tdap Vaccination Coverage Among Pregnant Women - United States, April 2018. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2018 Sep 28;67(38):1055-1059. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6738a3.
PubMed 30260946Yuen CY, Tarrant M. Determinants of uptake of influenza vaccination among pregnant women - a systematic review. Vaccine. 2014 Aug 6;32(36):4602-13. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.06.067. Epub 2014 Jul 2.
PubMed 24996123Myers KL. Predictors of maternal vaccination in the United States: An integrative review of the literature. Vaccine. 2016 Jul 25;34(34):3942-9. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2016.06.042. Epub 2016 Jun 18.
PubMed 27317458Ellingson MK, Dudley MZ, Limaye RJ, Salmon DA, O'Leary ST, Omer SB. Enhancing uptake of influenza maternal vaccine. Expert Rev Vaccines. 2019 Feb;18(2):191-204. doi: 10.1080/14760584.2019.1562907. Epub 2019 Jan 28.
PubMed 30587042O'Leary ST, Pyrzanowski J, Brewer SE, Dickinson LM, Dempsey AF. Evidence-based vaccination strategies in obstetrics and gynecology settings: Current practices and methods for assessment. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2016 Apr 2;12(4):866-71. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2015.1130194.
PubMed 26829978
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 21 Sep 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Assessment, Feedback, Incentive, Exchange (AFIX-OB) A Customizable Quality Improvement Intervention to Increase Maternal Vaccine Uptake
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04678271
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- AFIX-OB / 2000027357
- Conditions
- Influenza, Whooping Cough
- Keywords
- Pregnancy, Vaccination, Vaccine Acceptance, Influenza, Pertussis, Tdap
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 202 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Yale UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
- Study start
- 1 Jul 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Sep 2022 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 Jan 2023 (actual)
- First posted
- 21 Dec 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the AFIX-OB model to determine its impact on the change in flu and pertussis (Tdap) uptake, provider knowledge, attitudes and beliefs, and patient knowledge, attitudes and beliefs regarding maternal vaccination. The structure of the model and quality improvement interventions are guided by theory including the elaboration likelihood model and P3 model. These quality improvement measures will be implemented in OB clinics within the Yale New Haven Health System.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| AFIX-OB Intervention Arm | Experimental | Behavioral: AFIX-OB Quality Improvement PackagePractices randomized to this arm will choose from a suite of quality improvement interventions that address patient, provider, and practice-level factors relating to maternal vaccination. |
| Control Arm | No intervention | –Practices randomized to this arm will continue to provide their normal standard of care to pregnant patients at their practice. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 50 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Between 18-50 years of age
- Currently pregnant and gestational age <26 weeks
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Already enrolled in the study
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| AFIX-OB Quality Improvement PackagePractices randomized to the intervention arm will be provided with a package of core and supplemental quality improvement interventions to choose from so that the most effective combination for their practice is implemented. Each practice will be required to implement a tablet-based educational app for patients, and evidence based online educational module for providers, standing order protocol, and a reminder/recall protocol. They can then choose to also use flyers and posters in their waiting rooms, standardized talking points for maternal immunization for the providers, educational content for the practice website, and laminated and highlighted CDC Vaccine Information Sheets. The recruited patients and providers at the practice will be given a baseline and follow-up survey to assess their knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs towards maternal immunization. | Behavioural | AFIX-OB Intervention Arm |
Primary outcome
Change in Maternal Influenza Uptake
Time frame: Baseline and one year after implementation
Immunization rates for each practice will be collected through JDAT or a random chart review.
Change in Maternal Tdap Uptake
Time frame: Baseline and one year after implementation
Immunization rates for each practice will be collected through JDAT or a random chart review.
6 secondary outcomes
Change in Patient Vaccine Knowledge
Time frame: Baseline and one year after implementation
Change in Provider Vaccine Knowledge
Time frame: Baseline and one year after implementation
Change in Patient Vaccine Attitudes
Time frame: Baseline and one year after implementation
Change in Patient Vaccine Beliefs
Time frame: Baseline and one year after implementation
Change in Provider Vaccine Beliefs
Time frame: Baseline and one year after implementation
Change in Provider Vaccine Attitudes
Time frame: Baseline and one year after implementation
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 21 Sep 2023.
- Background: PubMed 10437765LeBaron CW, Mercer JT, Massoudi MS, Dini E, Stevenson J, Fischer WM, Loy H, Quick LS, Warming JC, Tormey P, DesVignes-Kendrick M. Changes in clinic vaccination coverage after institution of measurement and feedback in 4 states and 2 cities. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1999 Aug;153(8):879-86. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.153.8.879.
- Background: PubMed 26044495Chamberlain AT, Seib K, Ault KA, Rosenberg ES, Frew PM, Cortes M, Whitney EA, Berkelman RL, Orenstein WA, Omer SB. Improving influenza and Tdap vaccination during pregnancy: A cluster-randomized trial of a multi-component antenatal vaccine promotion package in late influenza season. Vaccine. 2015 Jul 9;33(30):3571-9. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.05.048. Epub 2015 Jun 1.
- Background: PubMed 10186655Dini EF, Chaney M, Moolenaar RL, LeBaron CW. Information as intervention: how Georgia used vaccination coverage data to double public sector vaccination coverage in seven years. J Public Health Manag Pract. 1996 Winter;2(1):45-9. doi: 10.1097/00124784-199600210-00008.
- Background: PubMed 9949744Fairbrother G, Hanson KL, Friedman S, Butts GC. The impact of physician bonuses, enhanced fees, and feedback on childhood immunization coverage rates. Am J Public Health. 1999 Feb;89(2):171-5. doi: 10.2105/ajph.89.2.171.
- Background: PubMed 30503657Frew PM, Murden R, Mehta CC, Chamberlain AT, Hinman AR, Nowak G, Mendel J, Aikin A, Randall LA, Hargreaves AL, Omer SB, Orenstein WA, Bednarczyk RA. Development of a US trust measure to assess and monitor parental confidence in the vaccine system. Vaccine. 2019 Jan 7;37(2):325-332. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.09.043. Epub 2018 Nov 30.
- Background: PubMed 30260946Kahn KE, Black CL, Ding H, Williams WW, Lu PJ, Fiebelkorn AP, Havers F, D'Angelo DV, Ball S, Fink RV, Devlin R. Influenza and Tdap Vaccination Coverage Among Pregnant Women - United States, April 2018. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2018 Sep 28;67(38):1055-1059. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6738a3.
- Background: PubMed 24996123Yuen CY, Tarrant M. Determinants of uptake of influenza vaccination among pregnant women - a systematic review. Vaccine. 2014 Aug 6;32(36):4602-13. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.06.067. Epub 2014 Jul 2.
- Background: PubMed 27317458Myers KL. Predictors of maternal vaccination in the United States: An integrative review of the literature. Vaccine. 2016 Jul 25;34(34):3942-9. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2016.06.042. Epub 2016 Jun 18.
- Background: PubMed 30587042Ellingson MK, Dudley MZ, Limaye RJ, Salmon DA, O'Leary ST, Omer SB. Enhancing uptake of influenza maternal vaccine. Expert Rev Vaccines. 2019 Feb;18(2):191-204. doi: 10.1080/14760584.2019.1562907. Epub 2019 Jan 28.
- Background: PubMed 26829978O'Leary ST, Pyrzanowski J, Brewer SE, Dickinson LM, Dempsey AF. Evidence-based vaccination strategies in obstetrics and gynecology settings: Current practices and methods for assessment. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2016 Apr 2;12(4):866-71. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2015.1130194.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Influenza
RecruitingPhase 2
BPL-1357 Against H1N1 Influenza Virus Challenge
Influenza, Human
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Safety and Immunogenicity of Chimeric Hemagglutinin mRNA Vaccine Candidates
Influenza
RecruitingPhase 3
Efficacy and Safety of Tozorakimab in Patients Hospitalised for Viral Lung Infection Requiring Supplemental Oxygen
Viral Lung Infection and Acute Respiratory Failure
RecruitingObservational study
Screening for LID Clinical Studies Unit Healthy Volunteer Protocols
Zika, Influenza
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Long-term Observation of Hemagglutinin and Neuraminidase Inhibition Antibody Titers After Influenza Challenge
Post Influenza
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing AFIX-OB Quality Improvement Package in people with Influenza and Whooping Cough, run by Yale University at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Sep 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in Maternal Influenza Uptake (time frame: Baseline and one year after implementation). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04678271, which also lists 10 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Sep 2023.