Chronic Rhinosinusitis Without Nasal PolypsPhase 2Liberty CRSsNPNCT04678856
Dupilumab in CRSsNP
A Phase 2 study testing Dupilumab SAR231893 in people with Chronic Rhinosinusitis Without Nasal Polyps and Sinusitis, run by Sanofi at 58 sites in 13 countries.
Trial summary
Primary Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of dupilumab as assessed by the reduction at Week 24 in sinus opacification on computerized tomography (CT) scan in the dupilumab group only Secondary Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy of dupilumab as assessed by the reduction at Week 24 in sinus opacification on CT scan… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Chronic Rhinosinusitis Without Nasal Polyps, Sinusitis, Chronic Sinusitis
- What is being tested?
- Dupilumab SAR231893
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 71 participants
- Where
- 58 sitesin 13 countries
- Study dates
- 2 Dec 2020to 29 Jan 2024
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Participant must be at least 18 years of age at the time of signing the informed consent form (ICF).
- Participants must have bilateral inflammation of paranasal sinuses in CT scan with LMK ≥8 and bilateral ethmoid opacification before randomization.
- Participants must have ongoing symptoms of loss of smell and rhinorrhea (anterior/posterior) of any severity, with or without facial pain/pressure for at least 12 consecutive weeks by Visit 1.
- Participants must have ongoing symptoms of nasal congestion (NC)/obstruction at least 12 consecutive weeks before Visit 1 and a NC score of ≥ 2 at Visit 1 (day score) and Visit 2 (weekly average score).
- Participants must have sTSS (NC, rhinorrhea, facial pain/pressure) ≥5 at Visit 1 (day score) and Visit 2 (weekly average score).
- Participants must have one of the 2 following features:
- Prior sinonasal surgery (see note at end of section 5.2 for definitions of sinonasal surgery) for CRS,
- Treatment with systemic corticosteroids (SCS) therapy for CRS as defined by any dose and duration within the prior 2 years before screening (Visit 1) or intolerance/contraindication to SCS.
Who cannot join
- Participants with nasal conditions/concomitant nasal diseases such as nasal polyposis in endoscopy at Visit 1 or with history of nasal polyposis etc., making them non-evaluable at Visit 1 or for the primary efficacy
- Nasal cavity malignant tumor and benign tumors.
- Forced expiratory volume (FEV1) ≤50% of predicted normal at Visit 1.
- Radiologic suspicion or confirmed invasive or expansive fungal rhinosinusitis.
- Severe concomitant illness(es) that, in the investigator's judgment, would adversely affect participation in the study
- Active tuberculosis or non-tuberculous mycobacterial infection, or a history of incompletely treated tuberculosis unless documented adequately treated.
Show all 25Show fewer
- Diagnosed active endoparasitic infections; suspected or high risk of endoparasitic infection
- Known or suspected immunodeficiency
- History of malignancy within 5 years before Visit 1, except completely treated in situ carcinoma of the cervix, and completely treated and resolved nonmetastatic squamous or basal cell carcinoma of the skin.
- Active chronic or acute infection requiring treatment with systemic antibiotics, antivirals, or antifungals within 2 weeks before the Screening Visit 1 or during the screening period.
- History of systemic hypersensitivity or anaphylaxis to dupilumab or any of its excipients.
- Participants in prior dupilumab clinical trial or have been treated with commercially available dupilumab within 12 months or who discontinued dupilumab use due to adverse event.
- Participants who are treated with intranasal corticosteroid drops; intranasal steroid emitting devices/stents; nasal spray using exhalation delivery system, such as Xhance™, during screening period.
- Participants on unstable dose of intranasal corticosteroids (INCS) spray 4 weeks prior to Screening Visit (Visit1) and during screening period.
- Participants who have undergone sinus intranasal surgery (including polypectomy) within 6 months prior to Visit 1.
- Participants who have taken:
- Biologic therapy/systemic immunosuppressant to treat inflammatory disease or autoimmune disease within 5 half-lives prior to Visit 1
- Any investigational mAb within 5 half-lives prior to Visit 1
- Anti-IgE therapy (omalizumab) within 4 months prior to Visit 1.
- Treatment with a live (attenuated) vaccine within 4 weeks prior to Visit 1
- Leukotriene antagonists/modifiers unless participant is on a continuous treatment for at least 30 days prior to Visit 1.
- Initiation of allergen immunotherapy within 3 months prior to Visit 1 or a plan to begin therapy or change its dose during the screening or treatment period.
- Participants received SCS during screening period (between Visit 1 and Visit 2).
- Either intravenous immunoglobulin therapy and/or plasmapheresis within 30 days prior to Screening Visit (Visit 1).
- The above information is not intended to contain all considerations relevant to a patient's potential participation in a clinical trial.
Trial locations and contacts
58 sites in 13 countries.
58 sites in 13 countries
United States11 sites
University of Missouri Health System Site Number : 8400016
Columbia, Missouri, 65212
Optimed Research, LTD Site Number : 8400017
Columbus, Ohio, 43235
Pharmaceutical Research & Consulting, Inc. Site Number : 8400006
Dallas, Texas, 75231
Colorado Allergy and Asthma Centers, PC Site Number : 8400003
Denver, Colorado, 80230
Eastern Virginia Medical School (EVMS) Medical Group - Otola Site Number : 8400009
Norfolk, Virginia, 23507
Nebraska Medical Research Institute Site Number : 8400007
Papillion, Nebraska, 68046
Sacramento Ear, Nose & Throat Site Number : 8400010
Roseville, California, 95661
Alamo ENT Associates Site Number : 8400021
San Antonio, Texas, 78258
Bensch Clinical Research LLC Site Number : 8400015
Stockton, California, 95207
Vital Prospects Clinical Research Institute, P.C. Site Number : 8400004
Tulsa, Oklahoma, 74136
Essential Medical Research, LLC Site Number : 8400014
Tulsa, Oklahoma, 74137
Canada9 sites
Investigational Site Number : 1240010
Hamilton, Ontario, L8L 2X2
Investigational Site Number : 1240007
Kingston, Ontario, K7L 2V7
Investigational Site Number : 1240016
London, Ontario, N6A 4V2
Investigational Site Number : 1240001
Montreal, Quebec, H2X 3E4
Investigational Site Number : 1240012
Montreal, Quebec, H4A 3J1
Investigational Site Number : 1240005
Québec, G1V 4G5
Investigational Site Number : 1240003
Québec, G1V 4W2
Investigational Site Number : 1240002
Trois-Rivières, Quebec, G8T 7A1
Investigational Site Number : 1240013
Vancouver, British Columbia, V6Z 1Y6
Spain8 sites
Investigational Site Number : 7240001
Barcelona, Barcelona [Barcelona], 08036
Investigational Site Number : 7240004
Jerez de la Frontera, Cádiz, 11407
Investigational Site Number : 7240009
Madrid, Madrid, Comunidad de, 28027
Investigational Site Number : 7240010
Madrid, 28034
Investigational Site Number : 7240005
Madrid / Madrid, Madrid, Comunidad de, 28040
Investigational Site Number : 7240008
Pamplona, Navarre, 31008
Investigational Site Number : 7240007
Santander, Cantabria, 39008
Investigational Site Number : 7240002
Seville, Andalusia, 41009
China6 sites
Investigational Site Number : 1560001
Beijing, 100730
Investigational Site Number : 1560005
Changchun, 130021
Investigational Site Number : 1560013
Changsha, 410013
Investigational Site Number : 1560010
Chongqing, 400016
Investigational Site Number : 1560006
Shanghai, 200065
Investigational Site Number : 1560008
Yantai, 264000
Ukraine6 sites
Investigational Site Number : 8040005
Dnipro, 49006
Investigational Site Number : 8040001
Ivano-Frankivsk, 76018
Investigational Site Number : 8040004
Kharkiv, 61166
Investigational Site Number : 8040008
Kyiv, 01033
Investigational Site Number : 8040002
Kyiv, 03680
Investigational Site Number : 8040007
Kyiv, 04050
Russia4 sites
Investigational Site Number : 6430005
Moscow, 121359
Investigational Site Number : 6430002
Saint Petersburg, 197022
Investigational Site Number : 6430003
Saint Petersburg, 197022
Investigational Site Number : 6430001
Stavropol, 355020
Argentina3 sites
Investigational Site Number : 0320002
Buenos Aires, C1121ABE
Investigational Site Number : 0320003
Ciudad Autonoma Buenos Aires, C1414AIF
Investigational Site Number : 0320001
Ciudad Autonoma Buenos Aires, C1425BEN
Portugal3 sites
Investigational Site Number : 6200002
Aveiro, 3810-501
Investigational Site Number : 6200001
Guimarães, 4810-061
Investigational Site Number : 6200003
Matosinhos Municipality, 4464-513
Belgium2 sites
Investigational Site Number : 0560002
Ghent, 9000
Investigational Site Number : 0560001
Leuven, 3000
Hungary2 sites
Investigational Site Number : 3480004
Budapest, 1115
Investigational Site Number : 3480001
Pécs, 7621
South Korea2 sites
Investigational Site Number : 4100003
Seoul, Seoul-teukbyeolsi, 07061
Investigational Site Number : 4100002
Seoul, Seoul-teukbyeolsi, 135-710
Chile1 site
Investigational Site Number : 1520001
Santiago, Reg Metropolitana de Santiago, 8207257
About this study
Official title: A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Dupilumab in Patients With Uncontrolled, Chronic Rhinosinusitis Without Nasal Polyposis (CRSsNP)
Primary Objective:
To evaluate the efficacy of dupilumab as assessed by the reduction at Week 24 in sinus opacification on computerized tomography (CT) scan in the dupilumab group only
Secondary Objectives:
- To evaluate the efficacy of dupilumab as assessed by the reduction at Week 24 in sinus opacification on CT scan and sinus total symptom score (sTSS) compared to placebo
- To evaluate the safety and tolerability of dupilumab in CRSsNP patients compared to placebo
- To evaluate the pharmacokinetics (PK) of dupilumab in CRSsNP patients compared to placebo
- Assessment of immunogenicity to dupilumab over time compared to placebo
Read the detailed description
The duration of study for each participant will include 2-4 weeks of screening period, 24-52 weeks randomized investigational medicinal product (IMP) intervention period and 12 weeks of follow-up period.
- Conditions
- Chronic Rhinosinusitis Without Nasal Polyps, Sinusitis, Chronic Sinusitis, Sinus Disorder, Respiratory Disorder
- Being tested
- Dupilumab SAR231893, Placebo
- Medical subject headings
- Sinusitis, Paranasal Sinus Diseases, Respiration Disorders
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Dupilumab SAR231893Drug
Pharmaceutical form:Injection solution Route of administration: Subcutaneous
PlaceboDrug
Pharmaceutical form:Injection solution Route of administration: Subcutaneous
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Part A and B: Dupilumab | Experimental | Participants received dupilumab 300 milligrams (mg) via SC injection q2w for up to 53.1 weeks. Receives: Drug: Dupilumab SAR231893 |
| Part A and B: Matching placebo | Placebo comparator | Participants received matching placebo via SC injection q2w for up to 53.2 weeks. Receives: Drug: Placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Opacification of Sinuses Assessed by Computed Tomography (CT) Scan Using the Lund Mackay (LMK) Score in Dupilumab Group
The CT scan LMK staging system represented the most widely established method of sinus CT scoring. The LMK total score is based on assessment of the CT scan findings for each sinus area (maxillary, anterior ethmoid, posterior ethmoid, sphenoid, and frontal sinus on each side). The extent of mucosal opacification is rated on a 3-point scale ranging from 0 = normal to 2 = total opacification. In addition, the ostiomeatal complex is graded as 0 = not occluded or 2 = occluded. The maximum score is therefore 12 per side; total score ranges from 0 (normal) to 24 (more opacified), corresponding to the sum of all sinuses and the ostiomeatal unit. Higher score indicated worse outcome. Baseline was defined as the last available value up to randomization date and prior to the first dose of study medication.
Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 24
Secondary outcomes (5)
Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Opacification of Sinuses Assessed by CT Scan Using the LMK Score
The CT scan LMK staging system represented the most widely established method of sinus CT scoring. The LMK total score is based on assessment of the CT scan findings for each sinus area (maxillary, anterior ethmoid, posterior ethmoid, sphenoid, and frontal sinus on each side). The extent of mucosal opacification is rated on a 3-point scale ranging from 0 = normal to 2 = total opacification. In addition, the ostiomeatal complex is graded as 0 = not occluded or 2 = occluded. The maximum score is therefore 12 per side; total score ranges from 0 (normal) to 24 (more opacified), corresponding to the sum of all sinuses and the ostiomeatal unit. Higher score indicated worse outcome. Baseline was defined as the last available value up to randomization date and prior to the first dose of study medication.
Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 24
Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Sinus Total Symptom Score (sTSS)
The sTSS is a composite score derived from the following individual items: nasal congestion (NC), anterior/posterior rhinorrhea, and facial pain/pressure. Each of the individual items were scored from 0 (no symptoms) to 3 (severe symptoms). The total score ranges from 0 to 9 and consists of the sum of NC, the averaged rhinorrhea item scores, and facial pain/pressure scores. Higher scores on sTSS indicated greater overall symptom severity. Baseline was defined as the last available value up to randomization date and prior to the first dose of study medication.
Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 24
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-Emergent Serious AEs (TESAEs), and TEAEs Leading to Treatment Discontinuation
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. TEAEs were AEs that developed, worsened or became serious during the treatment-emergent period. A SAE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose: resulted in death, was life-threatening, required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent disability/incapacity, was a congenital anomaly/birth defect, was a medically important event.
Measured: From the first dose of study drug (Day 1) up to the last dose of study drug administration (373 days) + 98 days, up to 471 days
Serum Concentration of Dupilumab Over Time
Blood samples were collected at the specified timepoints to evaluate serum concentration of dupilumab.
Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 12, 24 and 52
Number of Participants With Antidrug Antibody (ADA) Response to Dupilumab and Positive Neutralizing Antibody (Nab)
Plasma samples were collected to evaluate antibodies to dupilumab. Pre-existing immunoreactivity was defined as an ADA positive response in the assay at baseline with all post first dose ADA results negative, OR an ADA positive response at baseline with all post first dose ADA responses less than 4-fold over baseline titer levels. Treatment-emergent ADA responses were defined as a positive response in the ADA assay post first dose, when baseline results were negative or missing. Treatment-boosted response was defined as an ADA positive response in the assay post first dose that was greater-than or equal to 4-fold over baseline titer levels, when baseline results were positive. Samples positive in the ADA assay were further characterized for the presence of NAbs.
Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and up to Week 52
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted22 Dec 2020
- Study start2 Dec 2020
- Primary completion14 Nov 2023
- Study completion29 Jan 2024
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Chronic Rhinosinusitis Without Nasal PolypsStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by SanofiThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 71 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Sanofi
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Regeneron Pharmaceuticals
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Clinical Sciences & Operations, Study director, Sanofi
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04678856
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- EFC16723
- Other IDs
- U1111-1246-7522, 2020-003117-35
- Acronym
- Liberty CRSsNP
- Status last verified
- Jul 2026
- First submitted
- 16 Dec 2020
- Last updated
- 30 Jul 2026
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Qualified researchers may request access to patient level data and related study documents including the clinical study report, study protocol with any amendments, blank case report form, statistical analysis plan, and dataset specifications. Patient level data will be anonymized and study documents will be redacted to protect the privacy of trial participants. Further details on Sanofi's data sharing criteria, eligible studies, and process for requesting access can be found at: https://vivli.org
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 30 Jul 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Dupilumab in Patients With Uncontrolled, Chronic Rhinosinusitis Without Nasal Polyposis (CRSsNP)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04678856
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Liberty CRSsNP / EFC16723
- Conditions
- Chronic Rhinosinusitis Without Nasal Polyps, Sinusitis, Chronic Sinusitis, Sinus Disorder, Respiratory Disorder
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 71 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- SanofiIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Regeneron Pharmaceuticals
- Study start
- 2 Dec 2020 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 14 Nov 2023 (actual)
- Study completion
- 29 Jan 2024 (actual)
- First posted
- 22 Dec 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 18 Dec 2024
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Primary Objective:
To evaluate the efficacy of dupilumab as assessed by the reduction at Week 24 in sinus opacification on computerized tomography (CT) scan in the dupilumab group only
Secondary Objectives:
- To evaluate the efficacy of dupilumab as assessed by the reduction at Week 24 in sinus opacification on CT scan and sinus total symptom score (sTSS) compared to placebo
- To evaluate the safety and tolerability of dupilumab in CRSsNP patients compared to placebo
- To evaluate the pharmacokinetics (PK) of dupilumab in CRSsNP patients compared to placebo
- Assessment of immunogenicity to dupilumab over time compared to placebo
Detailed description
The duration of study for each participant will include 2-4 weeks of screening period, 24-52 weeks randomized investigational medicinal product (IMP) intervention period and 12 weeks of follow-up period.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Part A and B: Dupilumab | Experimental | Drug: Dupilumab SAR231893Participants received dupilumab 300 milligrams (mg) via SC injection q2w for up to 53.1 weeks. |
| Part A and B: Matching placebo | Placebo comparator | Drug: PlaceboParticipants received matching placebo via SC injection q2w for up to 53.2 weeks. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Participant must be at least 18 years of age at the time of signing the informed consent form (ICF).
- Participants must have bilateral inflammation of paranasal sinuses in CT scan with LMK ≥8 and bilateral ethmoid opacification before randomization.
- Participants must have ongoing symptoms of loss of smell and rhinorrhea (anterior/posterior) of any severity, with or without facial pain/pressure for at least 12 consecutive weeks by Visit 1.
- Participants must have ongoing symptoms of nasal congestion (NC)/obstruction at least 12 consecutive weeks before Visit 1 and a NC score of ≥ 2 at Visit 1 (day score) and Visit 2 (weekly average score).
- Participants must have sTSS (NC, rhinorrhea, facial pain/pressure) ≥5 at Visit 1 (day score) and Visit 2 (weekly average score).
Key exclusion criteria (25 listed)
- Participants with nasal conditions/concomitant nasal diseases such as nasal polyposis in endoscopy at Visit 1 or with history of nasal polyposis etc., making them non-evaluable at Visit 1 or for the primary efficacy
- Nasal cavity malignant tumor and benign tumors.
- Forced expiratory volume (FEV1) ≤50% of predicted normal at Visit 1.
- Radiologic suspicion or confirmed invasive or expansive fungal rhinosinusitis.
- Severe concomitant illness(es) that, in the investigator's judgment, would adversely affect participation in the study
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Dupilumab SAR231893Pharmaceutical form:Injection solution Route of administration: Subcutaneous | Drug | Part A and B: Dupilumab |
| PlaceboPharmaceutical form:Injection solution Route of administration: Subcutaneous | Drug | Part A and B: Matching placebo |
Primary outcome
Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Opacification of Sinuses Assessed by Computed Tomography (CT) Scan Using the Lund Mackay (LMK) Score in Dupilumab Group
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 24
The CT scan LMK staging system represented the most widely established method of sinus CT scoring. The LMK total score is based on assessment of the CT scan findings for each sinus area (maxillary, anterior ethmoid, posterior ethmoid, sphenoid, and frontal sinus on each side). The extent of mucosal opacification is rated on a 3-point scale ranging from 0 = normal to 2 = total opacification. In addition, the ostiomeatal complex is graded as 0 = not occluded or 2 = occluded. The maximum score is therefore 12 per side; total score ranges from 0 (normal) to 24 (more opacified), corresponding to the sum of all sinuses and the ostiomeatal unit. Higher score indicated worse outcome. Baseline was defined as the last available value up to randomization date and prior to the first dose of study medication.
5 secondary outcomes
Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Opacification of Sinuses Assessed by CT Scan Using the LMK Score
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 24
Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Sinus Total Symptom Score (sTSS)
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 24
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-Emergent Serious AEs (TESAEs), and TEAEs Leading to Treatment Discontinuation
Time frame: From the first dose of study drug (Day 1) up to the last dose of study drug administration (373 days) + 98 days, up to 471 days
Serum Concentration of Dupilumab Over Time
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 12, 24 and 52
Number of Participants With Antidrug Antibody (ADA) Response to Dupilumab and Positive Neutralizing Antibody (Nab)
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and up to Week 52
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 30 Jul 2026.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- EFC16723 Plain language Results SummaryLink provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Qualified researchers may request access to patient level data and related study documents including the clinical study report, study protocol with any amendments, blank case report form, statistical analysis plan, and dataset specifications. Patient level data will be anonymized and study documents will be redacted to protect the privacy of trial participants. Further details on Sanofi's data sharing criteria, eligible studies, and process for requesting access can be found at: https://vivli.org
Related trials for Chronic Rhinosinusitis Without Nasal Polyps
Recruiting
Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon Treatment of Chronic Rhinosinusitis
Chronic Rhinosinusitis (CRS) With and Without Nasal Polyps
Not yet recruiting
FESS With or Without Intranasal Desmopressin in Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyps
Chronic Sinusitis, Nasal Polyposis
RecruitingPhase 3
Efficacy and Safety of 186 mcg of OPN-375 Nasal Spray Twice a Day (BID) in Adolescents With Chronic Rhinosinusitis Without Nasal Polyps
Chronic Rhinosinusitis Without Nasal Polyps
RecruitingObservational study
CRS Questionnaire Validation Project
Chronic Rhinosinusitis (CRS) With and Without Nasal Polyps
RecruitingPhase 4
Efficacy and Safety of Depemokimab Monotherapy Without Concomitant Use of Intranasal Corticosteroids (INCS) in Japanese Participants With Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyps (CRSwNP)
Nasal Polyps
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Clinical Sciences & Operations study director
Sanofi
58 sites in 13 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Dupilumab SAR231893 in people with Chronic Rhinosinusitis Without Nasal Polyps and Sinusitis, run by Sanofi at 58 sites in 13 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 25 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 Jul 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 58 sites in United States, Canada, Spain, China, Ukraine and 8 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 18 Dec 2024). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Opacification of Sinuses Assessed by Computed Tomography (CT) Scan Using the Lund Mackay (LMK) Score in Dupilumab Group (time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 24). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 Jul 2026.