AzTrials
AzTrials

Head and Neck NeoplasmNCT04679233

Feasibility and Safety of Aerobic Exercise for Head and Neck Cancer Patients

A study testing Prescription aerobic exercise in people with Head and Neck Neoplasm and Radiotherapy, run by Vanderbilt University at 1 site in United States.

Withdrawn

Withdrawn. The study stopped before anyone enrolled.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Treated head and neck cancer patients are subject to tissue swelling and scarring, known as lymphedema and fibrosis (LEF). LEF in the head and neck cancer patient occurs in up to 90% of treated patients and is associated with inflammation cells. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 100 years
Conditions the study is for
Head and Neck Neoplasm, Radiotherapy
What is being tested?
Prescription aerobic exercise
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
0 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
Feb 2021to Sep 2021
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 100 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • 18 years of age
  • Histologic proof of primary diagnosis of head and neck cancer
  • Follow routinely with primary care doctor/general practitioner as evidenced by proof of appointment within the last 24 months)
  • Ability to understand English in order to understand instructions and complete questionnaires
  • Willing to participate in the supervised exercise intervention
  • In the planning stages of/or actively receiving IMRT
  • Must sign study-specific informed consent
  • Medical clearance by attending physician

Who cannot join

  • Evidence of distant metastasis prior to enrollment
  • Simultaneous primaries or unknown primary
  • Medical conditions that would prohibit the safe implementation of a an aerobic exercise practice per ACSM guidelines: cardiovascular disease, pulmonary disease, metabolic disease, or renal disease or signs/symptoms suggestive of cardiovascular disease at rest or during activity which include pain, discomfort in the chest, neck (other than caused by malignancy), jaw, arms, or other areas that may result from ischemia; shortness of breath at rest or with mild exertion; dizziness or syncope; orthopnea or paroxysmal nocturnal dyspnea; ankle edema; palpitations or tachycardia; intermittent claudication; known heart murmur; or unusual fatigue or shortness of breath with usual activities
  • An answer of "no" on any of the Physical Activity Readiness Questionnaire (PAR-Q+) screening questions
  • Pregnant or lactating women

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Johns Hopkins

    Baltimore, Maryland, 21231

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Feasibility and Preliminary Efficacy of Aerobic Exercise in Head and Neck Cancer Patients Undergoing Radiation Therapy

Treated head and neck cancer patients are subject to tissue swelling and scarring, known as lymphedema and fibrosis (LEF). LEF in the head and neck cancer patient occurs in up to 90% of treated patients and is associated with inflammation cells. Aerobic exercise is known to mediate these same inflammatory cells in an anti-inflammatory manner due to chronic adaptation of the cells. The investigators are therefore proposing a prescription exercise study for head and neck cancer patients. This study's primary aim is feasibility and safety of the aerobic exercise prescription. Feasibility of gathering study participant inflammation markers, visible LEF, and patient LEF symptoms will be a secondary aim of the study. Patient will be asked to journal their experience for a qualitative analysis. The prescription aerobic exercise is that of high intensity interval exercise, since this form of exercise can achieve similar or better results to moderate exercise with less time and patient burden. Each exercise session will take place on a cycle ergometer, will be 5 minutes warm up, 5 minutes cool down, and 20 minutes of exercise (1 minute intervals alternated by 1 minute rests x 10 each).

Read the detailed description

Treated head and neck cancer patients are subject to tissue swelling and scarring, known as lymphedema and fibrosis (LEF). LEF in the head and neck cancer patient occurs in up to 90% of treated patients, is associated with inflammation cells. Aerobic exercise is known to mediate these same inflammatory cells in an anti-inflammatory manner due to chronic adaptation of the cells. The investigators are therefore proposing a prescription exercise study for head and neck cancer patients. This study's primary aim is feasibility and safety. Feasibility of gathering study participant inflammation markers, visible LEF, and patient LEF symptoms will be a secondary aim of the study. Patient will be asked to journal their experience for a qualitative analysis.

Based on the evidence, the aerobic exercise prescription for those who provide informed consent will consist of 10 intervals of intensity, and 10 intervals at rest. Each interval of intensity will be 1 minutes long and each rest period will be 1 minute long, and there will be a five-minute warm-up and five-minute cool down of easy pedaling for a total of 30 minutes. Participants will complete two sessions per week, and there will be at least one business day in between each session, for a total of 10 total exercise sessions. The total study duration will be less than 35 days.

The supervised prescribed HIIE intervention will be performed on a stationary cycle ergometer. A cycle ergometer is preferred for safety reasons since it requires less gross motor coordination than might be required with a treadmill. To assist in establishing safety (primary aim), the study participants heart rate will be continually monitored by a clinician during the exercise, guiding them to keep their heart rate within their specifically calculated 80-95% of their maximum HR during the periods of intensity.

The investigators will compare outcomes at baseline with outcomes at the end of the 5-week study period.

Being tested
Prescription aerobic exercise
Keywords
Head and Neck Neoplasm, Radiotherapy, Exercise
Medical subject headings
Head and Neck Neoplasms, Motor Activity

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Prescription aerobic exerciseOther

    high intensity interval training, 5 weeks, 2 sessions/week - supervised by a clinician.

Study groups in NCT04679233
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Arm 1: Intervention ArmExperimentalArm 1 will receive the aerobic prescription exercise intervention. As this is a feasibility and safety study, there will not be a second arm.
Receives: Other: Prescription aerobic exercise

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Qualitative Feasibility Log of Recruitment of Participants

    To assess the feasibility of recruitment of a prescribed HIIE aerobic exercise modality for HNC patients. This will be measured by a Researchers Log which will include qualitative information regarding noted barriers to recruitment and reasons for patients not participating

    Measured: 6 months

  2. Quantified and Qualitative Log of Feasibility of Implementation

    To investigate the feasibility of a prescribed HIIE aerobic exercise modality for HNC patients. This will be measured by a Researchers Log which will include reasons that participants may have missed any of their assigned exercise sessions, as well as how many times they missed it.

    Measured: 6 months

  3. Quantified and Qualitative Retention Log of Participants

    To assess retention of a prescribed HIIE aerobic exercise modality for HNC patient. This will be measured by a Researchers Log which will include information such as number of participants enrolled, number of participants who dropped out, and reason for drop-out if available

    Measured: 6 months

  4. Safety of the intervention as noted by parameters for serum bloodwork

    To determine the safety of a prescribed HIIE aerobic exercise modality for HNC patients. This will be measured by a Researchers Log to ensure predetermined labs and electrolytes (platelets, magnesium, phosphorus, potassium) are within study parameter limits each week.

    Measured: 6 months

  5. Safety of the intervention as noted by parameters for vitals signs prior to participation

    To determine the safety of a prescribed HIIE aerobic exercise modality for HNC patients. This will be measured by a Researchers Log which will include ensuring vitals signs (heart rate in beats per minute, blood pressure in mmHg, oxygen in saturation, respiration rate in rate per minutes, and temperature in celsius) are within study parameter limits

    Measured: 6 months

  6. Safety of the intervention as noted by a timely log of adverse events,

    To determine the safety of a prescribed HIIE aerobic exercise modality for HNC patients. This will be measured by a Researchers Log which will include information such as measured by the CTCAE adverse events reported in accordance with and to the IRB

    Measured: 6 months

Secondary outcomes (8)
  1. Feasibility of Collecting Bloodwork - Biomarker MMP-9

    To assess the feasibility of collecting and using biomarkers as an outcome measure for research on the efficacy of a supervised prescribed HIIE modality for HNC patients. Collection of the following biomarkers is proposed: MMP-9. This will be measured as a blood draw, measured as ng/ml. Feasibility will be dichotomized and assessed as "yes" or "no" collected at both time points. Feasibility will be defined as 80% of blood draws collected at prescribed time.

    Measured: 6 months

  2. Feasibility of Collecting Bloodwork at two time points - Biomarker IL-6

    To assess the feasibility of collecting and using biomarkers as an outcome measure for research on the efficacy of a supervised prescribed HIIE modality for HNC patients. Collection of the following biomarkers is proposed: IL-6. This will be measured as a blood draw, measured as pg/ml. Feasibility will be dichotomized and assessed as "yes" or "no" collected at both time points. Feasibility will be defined as 80% of blood draws collected at prescribed time.

    Measured: 6 months

  3. Feasibility of Collecting Bloodwork at two time points - Biomarker IL-1β

    To assess the feasibility of collecting and using biomarkers as an outcome measure for research on the efficacy of a supervised prescribed HIIE modality for HNC patients. Collection of the following biomarkers is proposed: IL-1β. This will be measured as a blood draw, measured as pg/ml. Feasibility will be dichotomized and assessed as "yes" or "no" collected at both time points. Feasibility will be defined as 80% of blood draws collected at prescribed time.

    Measured: 6 months

  4. Feasibility of Collecting Bloodwork at two time points - Biomarker TNF-α

    To assess the feasibility of collecting and using biomarkers as an outcome measure for research on the efficacy of a supervised prescribed HIIE modality for HNC patients. Collection of the following biomarkers is proposed: TNF-α. This will be measured as a blood draw, measured as pg/ml. Feasibility will be dichotomized and assessed as "yes" or "no" collected at both time points. Feasibility will be defined as 80% of blood draws collected at prescribed time.

    Measured: 6 months

  5. Feasibility of Collecting Bloodwork at two time points - TGF-β1

    To assess the feasibility of collecting and using biomarkers as an outcome measure for research on the efficacy of a supervised prescribed HIIE modality for HNC patients. Collection of the following biomarkers is proposed: TGF-β1. This will be measured as a blood draw, measured as ng/mL. Feasibility will be dichotomized and assessed as "yes" or "no" collected at both time points. Feasibility will be defined as 80% of blood draws collected at prescribed time.

    Measured: 6 months

  6. Feasibility of Collecting Patient Reported Outcome at two time points

    To establish the feasibility of collecting the following outcome during the supervised prescribed HIIE regiment: LEF-related patient reported symptoms. The measurement tool to be used will be a validated a reliable patient reported outcome tool called the Lymphedema Symptom Inventory Distress Screening (LSIDS). Feasibility will be dichotomized and assessed as "yes" or "no" collected at both time points. Feasibility will be defined as 80% of LSIDS questionnaires completed in full.

    Measured: 6 months

  7. Feasibility of Clinician Outcome at two time points

    To establish the feasibility of collecting the following outcome during the supervised prescribed HIIE regiment: External Swelling LEF. The measurement tool to be used will be a standardized, validated, and reliable digital photography technique. Feasibility will be dichotomized and assessed as "yes" or "no" collected at both time points. Feasibility will be defined as 80% of digital photographs were able to be collected at prescribed time. Those with < 80% completed will be categorized as "no"

    Measured: 6 months

  8. Qualitative data on Patient Experience

    To gather preliminary feedback on the impact of a supervised prescribed HIIE regimen on patient perceived experience of the weekly exercise program as they undergo treatment via the measurement instrument of a personal and de-identified patient journal with self guided questions for patients to respond to open-endedly. This is to be analyzed qualitatively via qualitative content analysis

    Measured: 6 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted22 Dec 2020
  2. Study startFeb 2021 (estimated)
  3. Primary completionJun 2021 (estimated)
  4. Study completionSep 2021 (estimated)

Why it stopped: PI has withdrawn from the program, the study never started.

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Model description
Single group pre-test, post-test feasibility and safety study
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
0 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04679233
Sponsor's protocol ID
201579
Status last verified
Feb 2022
First submitted
25 Nov 2020
Last updated
24 Feb 2022
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No: individual participant data will not be shared. It will be de-identified prior to analysis.

Publications

  • Nelson ME, Rejeski WJ, Blair SN, Duncan PW, Judge JO, King AC, Macera CA, Castaneda-Sceppa C. Physical activity and public health in older adults: recommendation from the American College of Sports Medicine and the American Heart Association. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2007 Aug;39(8):1435-45. doi: 10.1249/mss.0b013e3180616aa2.

    PubMed 17762378
  • Schmitz KH, Courneya KS, Matthews C, Demark-Wahnefried W, Galvao DA, Pinto BM, Irwin ML, Wolin KY, Segal RJ, Lucia A, Schneider CM, von Gruenigen VE, Schwartz AL; American College of Sports Medicine. American College of Sports Medicine roundtable on exercise guidelines for cancer survivors. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2010 Jul;42(7):1409-26. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181e0c112.

    PubMed 20559064
  • Straub JM, New J, Hamilton CD, Lominska C, Shnayder Y, Thomas SM. Radiation-induced fibrosis: mechanisms and implications for therapy. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2015 Nov;141(11):1985-94. doi: 10.1007/s00432-015-1974-6. Epub 2015 Apr 25.

    PubMed 25910988
  • Ridner SH, Dietrich MS, Sonis ST, Murphy B. Biomarkers Associated with Lymphedema and Fibrosis in Patients with Cancer of the Head and Neck. Lymphat Res Biol. 2018 Nov 28;16(6):516-24. doi: 10.1089/lrb.2017.0074. Online ahead of print.

    PubMed 30484735
  • Venkatesulu BP, Mahadevan LS, Aliru ML, Yang X, Bodd MH, Singh PK, Yusuf SW, Abe JI, Krishnan S. Radiation-Induced Endothelial Vascular Injury: A Review of Possible Mechanisms. JACC Basic Transl Sci. 2018 Aug 28;3(4):563-572. doi: 10.1016/j.jacbts.2018.01.014. eCollection 2018 Aug.

    PubMed 30175280
  • Ridner SH, Dietrich MS, Niermann K, Cmelak A, Mannion K, Murphy B. A Prospective Study of the Lymphedema and Fibrosis Continuum in Patients with Head and Neck Cancer. Lymphat Res Biol. 2016 Dec;14(4):198-205. doi: 10.1089/lrb.2016.0001. Epub 2016 Jun 15.

    PubMed 27305456
  • Elrefaey S, Massaro MA, Chiocca S, Chiesa F, Ansarin M. HPV in oropharyngeal cancer: the basics to know in clinical practice. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2014 Oct;34(5):299-309.

    PubMed 25709145
  • Brayton KM, Hirsch AT, O Brien PJ, Cheville A, Karaca-Mandic P, Rockson SG. Lymphedema prevalence and treatment benefits in cancer: impact of a therapeutic intervention on health outcomes and costs. PLoS One. 2014 Dec 3;9(12):e114597. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0114597. eCollection 2014.

    PubMed 25470383
  • Brown M, McClean CM, Davison GW, Brown JCW, Murphy MH. The acute effects of walking exercise intensity on systemic cytokines and oxidative stress. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2018 Oct;118(10):2111-2120. doi: 10.1007/s00421-018-3930-z. Epub 2018 Jul 14.

    PubMed 30008038
  • Casuso RA, Aragon-Vela J, Huertas JR, Ruiz-Ariza A, Martinez-Lopez EJ. Comparison of the inflammatory and stress response between sprint interval swimming and running. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2018 Apr;28(4):1371-1378. doi: 10.1111/sms.13046. Epub 2018 Jan 24.

    PubMed 29281146
  • Cullen T, Thomas AW, Webb R, Hughes MG. Interleukin-6 and associated cytokine responses to an acute bout of high-intensity interval exercise: the effect of exercise intensity and volume. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2016 Aug;41(8):803-8. doi: 10.1139/apnm-2015-0640. Epub 2016 Mar 18.

    PubMed 27377137
  • Elmer DJ, Laird RH, Barberio MD, Pascoe DD. Inflammatory, lipid, and body composition responses to interval training or moderate aerobic training. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2016 Mar;116(3):601-9. doi: 10.1007/s00421-015-3308-4. Epub 2015 Dec 31.

    PubMed 26721463
  • Gmiat A, Micielska K, Kozlowska M, Flis DJ, Smaruj M, Kujach S, Jaworska J, Lipinska P, Ziemann E. The impact of a single bout of high intensity circuit training on myokines' concentrations and cognitive functions in women of different age. Physiol Behav. 2017 Oct 1;179:290-297. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2017.07.004. Epub 2017 Jul 5.

    PubMed 28687176
  • Hoekstra SP, Bishop NC, Leicht CA. Can intervals enhance the inflammatory response and enjoyment in upper-body exercise? Eur J Appl Physiol. 2017 Jun;117(6):1155-1163. doi: 10.1007/s00421-017-3602-4. Epub 2017 Apr 4.

    PubMed 28378071
  • Hojman P, Brolin C, Norgaard-Christensen N, Dethlefsen C, Lauenborg B, Olsen CK, Abom MM, Krag T, Gehl J, Pedersen BK. IL-6 release from muscles during exercise is stimulated by lactate-dependent protease activity. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2019 May 1;316(5):E940-E947. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.00414.2018. Epub 2019 Feb 19.

    PubMed 30779630

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Prescription aerobic exercise in people with Head and Neck Neoplasm and Radiotherapy, run by Vanderbilt University at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: withdrawn, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Feb 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Qualitative Feasibility Log of Recruitment of Participants (time frame: 6 months). The study lists 6 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04679233, which also lists 59 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Feb 2022.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in