Uterine Cervical NeoplasmSTEPNCT04679675
Self-Testing Options in the Era of Primary HPV Screening for Cervical Cancer Trial
A study testing Education, Direct Mail and Opt-in in people with Uterine Cervical Neoplasm and Uterine Neoplasms, run by Kaiser Permanente at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The Self-Testing options in the Era of Primary HPV screening for cervical cancer (STEP) trial will evaluate effectiveness of home-based HPV kits for improving cervical cancer screening uptake and its cost-effectiveness. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 30 to 64 years, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Uterine Cervical Neoplasm, Uterine Neoplasms, Genital Neoplasms, Female
- What is being tested?
- Education, Direct Mail and Opt-in
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 32,771 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 20 Nov 2020to 29 Jul 2023
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 30 to 64 years
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Currently enrolled at Kaiser Permanente Washington
- Female sex
- 30 years to 64 years of age
- An intact cervix
- Has a primary care provider at Kaiser Permanente Washington
Who cannot join
- Anyone flagged by the delivery system as being on a non-routine screening schedule
- Previously randomized to the intervention arm of the HOME trial or invited to the PATH study (Participants from the PATH study and individuals randomized to the intervention arm in the HOME Study are excluded from STEP because their prior inclusion in a STEP-related research study could influence their screening uptake and affect the outcome of this trial.)
- On "do not contact list" for research studies
- Currently pregnant or had a pregnancy-related procedure within prior 3 months
- Language interpreter needed
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute
Seattle, Washington, 98101
About this study
Official title: Self-Testing Options in the Era of Primary HPV Screening for Cervical Cancer: the STEP Trial
The Self-Testing options in the Era of Primary HPV screening for cervical cancer (STEP) trial will evaluate effectiveness of home-based HPV kits for improving cervical cancer screening uptake and its cost-effectiveness. The investigators will compare cervical cancer screening uptake within six months among women randomized to different outreach approaches based on prior screening behavior: A) Adherent and coming due: direct mail HPV kit vs. opt-in HPV kit vs. education; B) Overdue: direct mail HPV kit vs. education; C) Unknown: opt-in HPV kit vs. education.
Read the detailed description
The scientific objective of the proposed research is to study whether an in-home programmatic HPV screening outreach strategy improves cervical cancer screening initiation and uptake. Identifying new, patient-centered options that motivate continued screening initiation and uptake is essential now and in the future.
In August 2018, the US Preventive Services Task Force released updated cervical cancer screening guidelines that include human papillomavirus (HPV) testing alone (ie, primary HPV screening) as a newly recommended strategy for women aged 30-65 years. With primary HPV screening, home-based screening is an emerging option, because HPV tests (unlike Pap tests) can be performed on clinician- or self-collected samples. Self-collected samples are as sensitive as clinician-collected samples in detecting HPV and mailing HPV self-sampling kits increases screening participation. As US healthcare systems prepare to implement primary HPV screening, they will need to consider a variety of strategies. To date, HPV self-sampling randomized clinical trials have included only overdue women; no study has evaluated uptake and acceptance of HPV self-sampling kits as an alternative to in-clinic screening in a screening-adherent population.
Based on our Home-based Options to Make cervical cancer screening Easy (HOME) trial (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02005510), most women will test negative (88%) and can continue routine screening; 11% will require in-clinic follow-up: 3% directly to colposcopy (HPV-16/18+ results) and 8% to Pap because of "HPV+ other" results or an unsatisfactory result (<1%). For home-based HPV screening strategies to be successful, ensuring high follow-up compliance in the minority of women who test positive is critical.
- Conditions
- Uterine Cervical Neoplasm, Uterine Neoplasms, Genital Neoplasms, Female, Urogenital Neoplasms, Neoplasms by Site, Neoplasms
- Being tested
- Usual Care, Education, Direct Mail, Opt-in
- Keywords
- Cancer Screening
- Medical subject headings
- Uterine Cervical Neoplasms, Uterine Neoplasms, Genital Neoplasms, Female, Urogenital Neoplasms, Neoplasms by Site, Neoplasms, Uterine Cervical Diseases, Uterine Diseases
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Usual CareOther
Subjects will receive Kaiser Permanente Washington standard of care.
EducationBehavioural
Participants will receive an Educational Brochure describing why screening for cervical cancer is important, information about HPV and its role in cervical cancer, and different strategies for cervical cancer screening.
Direct MailBehavioural
Participants will receive an Educational Brochure describing why screening for cervical cancer is important, information about HPV and its role in cervical cancer, and different strategies for cervical cancer screening. Participants will also receive an insert describing the home-based cervical cancer screening option and that a kit will be sent within 1 week. An HPV self-collection kit with instructions and a pre-paid return envelope (to Kaiser Permanente Washington's laboratory) will be sent to individuals with instructions on how to complete the kit.
Opt-inBehavioural
Participants will receive an Educational Brochure describing why screening for cervical cancer is important, information about HPV and its role in cervical cancer, and different strategies for cervical cancer screening. Participants will receive an Opt-in Insert describing the home-based cervical cancer screening option and how to request a kit. Individuals can request a kit by phone or through a webpage. Individuals who request a kit will receive the HPV self-collection kit with instructions and a pre-paid return envelope (to Kaiser Permanente Washington's laboratory) will be sent to individuals with instructions on how to complete the kit.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Usual Care | Active comparator | Not described Receives: Other: Usual Care |
| Education | Active comparator | Not described Receives: Behavioral: Education |
| Direct Mail | Active comparator | Not described Receives: Behavioral: Direct Mail |
| Opt-in | Active comparator | Not described Receives: Behavioral: Opt-in |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Screening Completion by Outreach Approach and Prior Screening Behavior
Rate of completing cervical cancer screening completion by outreach approach and prior screening behavior. Screening completion defined by returning the home kit and attending the recommended in clinic follow-up (if applicable); or receiving in clinic screening.
Measured: Within 6 months of randomization
Secondary outcomes (7)
Incremental Cost-effectiveness Ratio by Outreach Approach and Prior Screening Behavior
Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, which will be defined for each outreach approach within each screening behavior subgroup. Also, comparisons across screening behavior subgroups of usual care plus education to usual care.
Measured: Within 6 months of randomization
Screening Initiation by Outreach Approach and Prior Screening Behavior
Screening Initiation defined as returning the home kit or receiving in clinic cervical cancer screening.
Measured: Within 6 months of randomization
Time From Randomization to Screening Completion by Outreach Approach and Prior Screening Behavior
Time from randomization to screening completion by outreach approach and prior screening behavior. Screening completion defined by returning the home kit and attending the recommended in clinic follow-up (if applicable); or receiving in clinic screening.
Measured: Within 6 months of randomization
Completion of Recommended Follow-up After a Positive Kit Result
Proportion of intervention group women who complete recommended follow-up after a positive kit result by outreach approach and prior screening behavior. Per current guidelines, in-clinic Pap after other-HR HPV positive; or colposcopy after HPV 16/18+ HPV self-collection
Measured: Within 6 months of randomization
Screening Method Choice
Proportion of intervention group women who do not screen, return the home kit or receive in-clinic screening by outreach approach and prior screening behavior. Screening uptake outcome (no screen, home kit, or in-clinic) by outreach approach and by prior screening behavior
Measured: Within 6 months of randomization
Qualitative Information From Focus Groups on Patient Preferences by Prior Screening Behavior
Through focus groups, the investigators will explore patient preference for, and satisfaction with, home HPV screening and barriers to follow-up of abnormal screening results.
Measured: 6-12 months following study invitation
Health System Costs to Implementing Home Testing by Outreach Approach and Prior Screening Behavior
Economic assessment of system-level financial consequences of adopting home-based HPV screening for cervical cancer. These analyses will evaluate the needed time to follow-up for the next cervical cancer screening to reduce gaps in cervical cancer screening HEDIS metrics, which also addresses program affordability.
Measured: 3-5 years (projected)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted22 Dec 2020
- Study start20 Nov 2020
- Primary completion29 Jul 2022
- Study completion29 Jul 2023
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Uterine Cervical NeoplasmStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Kaiser PermanenteThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- The investigators will test interventions separately by prior cervical cancer screening behavior: Screening Adherent, Overdue, and Unknown history. Interventions will differ by screening behavior. Previously Adherent: Previously screened for cervical cancer with a known due date within three months Overdue: Never screened for cervical cancer; or HPV and Pap co-test \>5.25 years ago \[or Pap alone \>3.25 years ago\]; or no past Pap and continuously enrolled at Kaiser Permanente Washington for ≥3.25 years. Unknown Prior Screening Behavior: Enrolled at Kaiser Permanente Washington for ≥6 months and \<3.25 years, with no recorded cervical cancer screening history. Cohort randomization allocation will be assigned as follows to intervention arms: Previously Adherent (Usual Care, Education, Opt-in, and Direct Mail); Overdue (Usual Care, Education, and Direct Mail); and Unknown (Usual Care, Education, and Opt-in).
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Investigator
- Enrolment
- 32,771 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Kaiser Permanente
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Cancer Institute (NCI), University of Washington, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Beverly B Green, MD, MPH, Principal investigator, Kaiser PermanenteRachel L Winer, PhD, MPH, Principal investigator, University of Washington
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04679675
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 00002344
- Other IDs
- R01CA240375
- Acronym
- STEP
- Status last verified
- Sep 2023
- First submitted
- 9 Dec 2020
- Last updated
- 18 Sep 2023
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Resources developed during the study will be made available in accordance with the NIH Data Sharing Policy to researchers in both the private and public sector free or for a nominal charge and with minimal restriction. Deidentified data will be made available to qualified investigators within 6 months of acceptance of the manuscript describing major outcomes. Requestors will be required to obtain IRB approval and sign a data use agreement before data will be released. The data use agreement must include the following commitments: a commitment to using the data for research purposes only and not to identify any individual participants or to disclose Kaiser Permanente proprietary information; a commitment to securing the data using appropriate computer technology; a commitment to destroying or returning the data after analyses are completed; and a commitment to meet any additional requirements that might be stipulated by Kaiser Permanente's Human Subjects Review Committee.
Publications
Tiro JA, Metcalfe S, Muthukrishnan M, Jose A, Hansen K, Lin J, Dorsey CN, Gao H, Lacey C, Anderson ML, Meenan RT, Green BB, Buist DSM, Sparks A, Winer RL. Promoting cervical cancer screening via a mailed HPV self-collection kit: Reactions from screeners and non-screeners. Patient Educ Couns. 2026 Jan;142:109374. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2025.109374. Epub 2025 Oct 3.
PubMed 41067140Winer RL, Lin J, Anderson ML, Tiro JA, Green BB, Gao H, Meenan RT, Hansen K, Sparks A, Buist DSM. Strategies to Increase Cervical Cancer Screening With Mailed Human Papillomavirus Self-Sampling Kits: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2023 Nov 28;330(20):1971-1981. doi: 10.1001/jama.2023.21471.
PubMed 38015219
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 18 Sep 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Self-Testing Options in the Era of Primary HPV Screening for Cervical Cancer: the STEP Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04679675
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- STEP / 00002344
- Conditions
- Uterine Cervical Neoplasm, Uterine Neoplasms, Genital Neoplasms, Female, Urogenital Neoplasms, Neoplasms by Site, Neoplasms
- Keywords
- Cancer Screening
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 32,771 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Kaiser PermanenteUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Cancer Institute (NCI), University of Washington, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
- Study start
- 20 Nov 2020 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 29 Jul 2022 (actual)
- Study completion
- 29 Jul 2023 (actual)
- First posted
- 22 Dec 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 24 Aug 2023
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The Self-Testing options in the Era of Primary HPV screening for cervical cancer (STEP) trial will evaluate effectiveness of home-based HPV kits for improving cervical cancer screening uptake and its cost-effectiveness. The investigators will compare cervical cancer screening uptake within six months among women randomized to different outreach approaches based on prior screening behavior: A) Adherent and coming due: direct mail HPV kit vs. opt-in HPV kit vs. education; B) Overdue: direct mail HPV kit vs. education; C) Unknown: opt-in HPV kit vs. education.
Detailed description
The scientific objective of the proposed research is to study whether an in-home programmatic HPV screening outreach strategy improves cervical cancer screening initiation and uptake. Identifying new, patient-centered options that motivate continued screening initiation and uptake is essential now and in the future.
In August 2018, the US Preventive Services Task Force released updated cervical cancer screening guidelines that include human papillomavirus (HPV) testing alone (ie, primary HPV screening) as a newly recommended strategy for women aged 30-65 years. With primary HPV screening, home-based screening is an emerging option, because HPV tests (unlike Pap tests) can be performed on clinician- or self-collected samples. Self-collected samples are as sensitive as clinician-collected samples in detecting HPV and mailing HPV self-sampling kits increases screening participation. As US healthcare systems prepare to implement primary HPV screening, they will need to consider a variety of strategies. To date, HPV self-sampling randomized clinical trials have included only overdue women; no study has evaluated uptake and acceptance of HPV self-sampling kits as an alternative to in-clinic screening in a screening-adherent population.
Based on our Home-based Options to Make cervical cancer screening Easy (HOME) trial (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02005510), most women will test negative (88%) and can continue routine screening; 11% will require in-clinic follow-up: 3% directly to colposcopy (HPV-16/18+ results) and 8% to Pap because of "HPV+ other" results or an unsatisfactory result (<1%). For home-based HPV screening strategies to be successful, ensuring high follow-up compliance in the minority of women who test positive is critical.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (investigator)
- Number of arms
- 4
- Model description
- The investigators will test interventions separately by prior cervical cancer screening behavior: Screening Adherent, Overdue, and Unknown history. Interventions will differ by screening behavior. Previously Adherent: Previously screened for cervical cancer with a known due date within three months Overdue: Never screened for cervical cancer; or HPV and Pap co-test >5.25 years ago [or Pap alone >3.25 years ago]; or no past Pap and continuously enrolled at Kaiser Permanente Washington for ≥3.25 years. Unknown Prior Screening Behavior: Enrolled at Kaiser Permanente Washington for ≥6 months and <3.25 years, with no recorded cervical cancer screening history. Cohort randomization allocation will be assigned as follows to intervention arms: Previously Adherent (Usual Care, Education, Opt-in, and Direct Mail); Overdue (Usual Care, Education, and Direct Mail); and Unknown (Usual Care, Education, and Opt-in).
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Usual Care | Active comparator | Other: Usual Care |
| Education | Active comparator | Behavioral: Education |
| Direct Mail | Active comparator | Behavioral: Direct Mail |
| Opt-in | Active comparator | Behavioral: Opt-in |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 30 to 64 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Currently enrolled at Kaiser Permanente Washington
- Female sex
- 30 years to 64 years of age
- An intact cervix
- Has a primary care provider at Kaiser Permanente Washington
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Anyone flagged by the delivery system as being on a non-routine screening schedule
- Previously randomized to the intervention arm of the HOME trial or invited to the PATH study (Participants from the PATH study and individuals randomized to the intervention arm in the HOME Study are excluded from STEP because their prior inclusion in a STEP-related research study could influence their screening uptake and affect the outcome of this trial.)
- On "do not contact list" for research studies
- Currently pregnant or had a pregnancy-related procedure within prior 3 months
- Language interpreter needed
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Usual CareSubjects will receive Kaiser Permanente Washington standard of care. | Other | Usual Care |
| EducationParticipants will receive an Educational Brochure describing why screening for cervical cancer is important, information about HPV and its role in cervical cancer, and different strategies for cervical cancer screening. | Behavioural | Education |
| Direct MailParticipants will receive an Educational Brochure describing why screening for cervical cancer is important, information about HPV and its role in cervical cancer, and different strategies for cervical cancer screening. Participants will also receive an insert describing the home-based cervical cancer screening option and that a kit will be sent within 1 week. An HPV self-collection kit with instructions and a pre-paid return envelope (to Kaiser Permanente Washington's laboratory) will be sent to individuals with instructions on how to complete the kit. | Behavioural | Direct Mail |
| Opt-inParticipants will receive an Educational Brochure describing why screening for cervical cancer is important, information about HPV and its role in cervical cancer, and different strategies for cervical cancer screening. Participants will receive an Opt-in Insert describing the home-based cervical cancer screening option and how to request a kit. Individuals can request a kit by phone or through a webpage. Individuals who request a kit will receive the HPV self-collection kit with instructions and a pre-paid return envelope (to Kaiser Permanente Washington's laboratory) will be sent to individuals with instructions on how to complete the kit. | Behavioural | Opt-in |
Primary outcome
Screening Completion by Outreach Approach and Prior Screening Behavior
Time frame: Within 6 months of randomization
Rate of completing cervical cancer screening completion by outreach approach and prior screening behavior. Screening completion defined by returning the home kit and attending the recommended in clinic follow-up (if applicable); or receiving in clinic screening.
7 secondary outcomes
Incremental Cost-effectiveness Ratio by Outreach Approach and Prior Screening Behavior
Time frame: Within 6 months of randomization
Screening Initiation by Outreach Approach and Prior Screening Behavior
Time frame: Within 6 months of randomization
Time From Randomization to Screening Completion by Outreach Approach and Prior Screening Behavior
Time frame: Within 6 months of randomization
Completion of Recommended Follow-up After a Positive Kit Result
Time frame: Within 6 months of randomization
Screening Method Choice
Time frame: Within 6 months of randomization
Qualitative Information From Focus Groups on Patient Preferences by Prior Screening Behavior
Time frame: 6-12 months following study invitation
Health System Costs to Implementing Home Testing by Outreach Approach and Prior Screening Behavior
Time frame: 3-5 years (projected)
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 18 Sep 2023.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 41067140Tiro JA, Metcalfe S, Muthukrishnan M, Jose A, Hansen K, Lin J, Dorsey CN, Gao H, Lacey C, Anderson ML, Meenan RT, Green BB, Buist DSM, Sparks A, Winer RL. Promoting cervical cancer screening via a mailed HPV self-collection kit: Reactions from screeners and non-screeners. Patient Educ Couns. 2026 Jan;142:109374. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2025.109374. Epub 2025 Oct 3.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 38015219Winer RL, Lin J, Anderson ML, Tiro JA, Green BB, Gao H, Meenan RT, Hansen K, Sparks A, Buist DSM. Strategies to Increase Cervical Cancer Screening With Mailed Human Papillomavirus Self-Sampling Kits: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2023 Nov 28;330(20):1971-1981. doi: 10.1001/jama.2023.21471.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Resources developed during the study will be made available in accordance with the NIH Data Sharing Policy to researchers in both the private and public sector free or for a nominal charge and with minimal restriction. Deidentified data will be made available to qualified investigators within 6 months of acceptance of the manuscript describing major outcomes. Requestors will be required to obtain IRB approval and sign a data use agreement before data will be released. The data use agreement must include the following commitments: a commitment to using the data for research purposes only and not to identify any individual participants or to disclose Kaiser Permanente proprietary information; a commitment to securing the data using appropriate computer technology; a commitment to destroying or returning the data after analyses are completed; and a commitment to meet any additional requirements that might be stipulated by Kaiser Permanente's Human Subjects Review Committee.
Related trials for Uterine Cervical Neoplasm
Recruiting
Use Misoprostol to Optimize Prevention of Cervical Cancer
Cervical Cancers
RecruitingObservational study
Role of Liquid Biopsies in HPV-associated Cancer Treatment Monitoring
Cervical Cancer, Cervical Dysplasia
RecruitingPhase 4
Ocular Assessments in Patients Treated With Tivdak® in Recurrent or Metastatic Cervical Cancer
Cervical Cancer
RecruitingObservational study
Leveraging Methylated DNA Markers (MDMs) in the Detection of Endometrial Cancer, Ovarian Cancer, and Cervical Cancer
Endometrial Cancer, Cervical Cancer
RecruitingPhase 1
A Study of Sofe-M in Participants With Selected Advanced Solid Tumors
Ovarian Neoplasms, Endometrial Neoplasms
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Beverly B Green, MD, MPH principal investigator
Kaiser Permanente
Rachel L Winer, PhD, MPH principal investigator
University of Washington
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Education, Direct Mail and Opt-in in people with Uterine Cervical Neoplasm and Uterine Neoplasms, run by Kaiser Permanente at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Sep 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 24 Aug 2023). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Screening Completion by Outreach Approach and Prior Screening Behavior (time frame: Within 6 months of randomization). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04679675, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Sep 2023.