Follicular LymphomaPhase 3InMINDNCT04680052
A Phase 3 Study to Assess Efficacy and Safety of Tafasitamab Plus Lenalidomide and Rituximab Compared to Placebo Plus Lenalidomide and Rituximab in Patients With Relapsed/Refractory (R/R) Follicular Lymphoma or Marginal Zone Lymphoma.
A Phase 3 study testing tafasitamab, rituximab and lenalidomide in people with Follicular Lymphoma and Marginal Zone Lymphoma, run by Incyte Corporation at 261 sites in 28 countries.
Trial summary
This is a Phase 3 double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized study designed to investigate whether tafasitamab and lenalidomide as an add-on to rituximab provides improved clinical benefit compared with lenalidomide as an add-on to rituximab in patients with R/R FL Grade 1 to 3a or R/R MZL. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Follicular Lymphoma, Marginal Zone Lymphoma
- What is being tested?
- tafasitamab, rituximab and lenalidomide
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 654 participants
- Where
- 261 sitesin 28 countries
- Study dates
- 15 Apr 2021to 9 Aug 2028
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Histologically confirmed Grade 1, 2, or 3a FL or nodal MZL, splenic MZL, or extra nodal MZL
- Willingness to avoid pregnancy or fathering children
- In the opinion of the investigator, be able and willing to receive adequate mandatory prophylaxis and/or therapy for thromboembolic events (eg, aspirin 70-325 mg daily or low-molecular-weight heparin)
- Previously treated with at least 1 prior systemic anti-CD20 immunotherapy or chemo-immunotherapy
- Documented relapsed, refractory, or PD after treatment with systemic therapy
- ECOG performance status of 0 to 2
Who cannot join
- Women who are pregnant or breastfeeding.
- Any histology other than FL and MZL or clinical evidence of transformed lymphoma
- Prior non-hematologic malignancy
- Congestive heart failure
- HCV positivity, chronic HBV infection or history of HIV infection
- Active systemic infection
Show all 9Show fewer
- CNS lymphoma involvement
- Any systemic anti-lymphoma and/or investigational therapy within 28 days prior to the start of Cycle 1
- Prior use of lenalidomide in combination with rituximab
Trial locations and contacts
261 sites in 28 countries.
261 sites in 28 countries
United States38 sites
University of Maryland-Greenebaum Cancer Center
Baltimore, Maryland, 21201
Cancer Center For Blood Disorders
Bethesda, Maryland, 20817
Roswell Park Cancer Institute
Buffalo, New York, 14263
Charleston Hematology Oncology Associates
Charleston, South Carolina, 29414
Levine Cancer Institute
Charlotte, North Carolina, 28204
University of Virginia Medical Center
Charlottesville, Virginia, 22908
John Muir Health Clinical Research Center
Concord, California, 94520-2266
Texas Oncology-Baylor Charles A. Sammons
Dallas, Texas, 75246
Des Moines Oncology Research Association
Des Moines, Iowa, 50309
Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Hospital
Detroit, Michigan, 48201
The Center For Cancer and Blood Disorders
Fort Worth, Texas, 76104
Marin Cancer Care
Greenbrae, California, 94904
Prisma Health Upstate
Greenville, South Carolina, 29615
Hattiesburg Clinic Hematology
Hattiesburg, Mississippi, 39401
Straub Medical Center
Honolulu, Hawaii, 96813
Lyndon B Johnson General Hospital
Houston, Texas, 77026
Md Anderson Cancer Center
Houston, Texas, 77030
Cancer Specialists of North Florida
Jacksonville, Florida, 32256
Baptist Health Lexington
Lexington, Kentucky, 40503
Norton Cancer Institute
Louisville, Kentucky, 40207
Northwest Georgia Oncology Centers,P.C
Marietta, Georgia, 30060
Middlesex Hospital Cancer Center
Middletown, Connecticut, 06457
Smilow Cancer Hospital
New Haven, Connecticut, 06510
Tulane University
New Orleans, Louisiana, 70112
Nyu Clinical Cancer Center
New York, New York, 10016
Integris Cancer Institute
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73142
Vista Oncology Inc Ps
Olympia, Washington, 98506
The Oncology Institute of Hope and Innovation
Pasadena, California, 91105
Brcr Medical Center, Inc
Plantation, Florida, 33322
Metro-Minnesota Community Oncology Reserch Consortium (Mmcorc)
Saint Louis Park, Minnesota, 55416
Utah Cancer Specialists
Salt Lake City, Utah, 84107
Sharp Memorial Hospital
San Diego, California, 92123
Virginia Mason Medical Center
Seattle, Washington, 98101
University of Washington-Seattle Cancer Care Alliance
Seattle, Washington, 98109-4405
Renovatio Clinical
Spring, Texas, 77380
Northwest Medical Specialties Pllc
Tacoma, Washington, 98405
Prairie Lakes Health Care System, Inc.
Watertown, South Dakota, 57201
Asclepes Research Centers
Weeki Wachee, Florida, 34607
Spain26 sites
Complejo Hospitalario Universitario A Coruna
A Coruña, 15006
Hospital General Unviersitario de Alicante
Alicante, 03010
Ico Hospital Germans Trias I Pujol
Badalona, 08916
Hospital Del Mar
Barcelona, 08003
Hospital General Universitario Vall D Hebron
Barcelona, 08007
Hospital de La Santa Creu I Sant Pau
Barcelona, 08041
Hospital Universitario de Burgos
Burgos, 09006
Hospital Universitario de Cabuenes
Gijón, 33394
Institut Catala Doncologia Ico - Hospital Duran I Reynals Location
L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, 08908
Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Maranon
Madrid, 28007
Hospital Universitario Ramon Y Cajal
Madrid, 28034
Fundacion Jimenez Diaz University Hospital
Madrid, 28040
Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre
Madrid, 28041
Hospital Universitario Quironsalud Madrid
Madrid, 28223
Hospital Puerta de Hierro
Majadahonda, 28222
Hospital Universitario Virgen de La Victoria
Málaga, 29010
Hospital Universitario Virgen de La Arrixaca
Murcia, 30120
Hospital Son Llatzer
Palma de Mallorca, 07198
Consorci Hospitalari Parc Tauli de Sabadell
Sabadell, 08208
Hospital Clinico Universitario de Salamanca
Salamanca, 37007
Hospital Universitario Marques de Valdecilla
Santander, 39008
Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocio Sevilla
Seville, 41005
Hospital Universitari Mutua Terrassa
Terrassa, 08221
Hospital Universitario Doctor Peset
Valencia, 46017
Hospital Universitari I Politecnic La Fe
Valencia, 46026
Hospital Universitario de Alava
Vitoria-Gasteiz, 01009
Italy24 sites
Istituto Tumori Giovanni Paolo Ii Irccs Ospedale Oncologico Bari
Bari, 70124
Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale Degli Spedali Civili Di Brescia
Brescia, 25123
Divisione Clinicizzata Di Ematologia
Brescia, 25123
Fondazione Del Piemonte Per L Oncologia Ircc Candiolo
Candiolo, 10060
Divisione Clinicizzata Di Ematologia
Catania, 95123
Presidio Ospedaliero Vito Fazzi
Lecce, 73100
Comitato Etico Fondazione Irccs Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori Milano
Milan, 20133
Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda
Milan, 20162
Istituto Nazionale Tumori Irccs Fondazione Pascale
Naples, 80131
Universita Di Napoli Federico Ii
Naples, 80131
Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Maggiore Della Carita Di Novara
Novara, 28100
Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria San Luigi Gonzaga Orbassano
Orbassano, 10043
Azienda Ospedaliera Ospedali Riuniti Villa Sofia - Cervello
Palermo, 90146
Fondazione Irccs Policlinico San Matteo
Pavia, 27100
Ausl Di Placenza Ospedale Guglielmo Da Saliceto
Piacenza, 29100
Uo Ematologia Univ - Aoup Santa Chiara Pisa
Pisa, 56126
Ospedale Santa Maria Delle Croci
Ravenna, 48121
Arcispedale Santa Maria Nuova
Reggio Emilia, 42100
Ausl Della Romagna
Rimini, 47923
Universita Degli Studi Di Roma La Sapienza - Umberto I Policlinico Di Roma - Centro Di Ematologia
Roma, 00161
Ospedale Sant. Eugenio
Rome, 00144
Irccs Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria San Martino
San Martino, 16132
Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Citta Della Salute E Della Scienza
Torino, 10126
Asugi Ospedale Maggiore
Trieste, 34125
Japan15 sites
National Hospital Organization Kyushu Cancer Center
Fukuoka, 811-1395
Chugoku Center Hospital
Fukuyama-shi, 720-0001
Gifu Municipal Hospital
Gifu, 500-8513
Kagoshima University Hospital
Kagoshima, 890-8520
National Cancer Center Hospital East
Kashiwa-shi, 277-8577
Hospital of the University of Occupation and Environmental Health
Kitakyushu-shi, 807-8556
Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital
Kobe, 650-0047
Japanese Red Cross Nagoya Daini Hospital
Nagoya, 466 8650
Iuhw Narita Hospital
Narita, 286-8520
Kindai University Hospital
Osakasayama-shi, 589-8511
Saitama Medical University Hospital
Saitama, 350-0495
Osaka University Hospital
Suita-shi, 565-0871
Juntendo University Hospital
Tokyo, 113-8431
Mie University Hospital
Tsu, 514-8507
Yamagata University Hospital
Yamagata, 990-9585
South Korea14 sites
Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital
Busan, 03181
Inje University Busan Paik Hospital
Busan, 47392
Dong-A University Hospital
Busan, 49201
Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital
Busan, 602-739
Kyungpook National University Hospital
Daegu, 41944
Daegu Catholic University Medical Center
Daegu, 42472
Keimyung University Dongsan Medical Center
Daegu, 42601
Chungnam National University
Daejeon, 35015
Gacheon University Gil Medical Center
Incheon, 21565
Jeonbuk National University Hospital
Jeonju, 54907
Seoul National University Hospital
Seoul, 03080
Severance Hospital Yonsei University Health System
Seoul, 03722
Samsung Medical Center
Seoul, 06351
The Catholic University of Korea Yeoido St.Mary'S Hospital
Seoul, 07345
Australia12 sites
Royal Adelaide Hospital
Adelaide, South Australia, 05000
Flinders Medical Centre
Bedford Park, South Australia, 05042
Eastern Health
Box Hill, 3128
Royal Hobart Hospital
Hobart, 07000
St George Hospital
Kogarah, New South Wales, 02217
The Alfred Hospital
Melbourne, Victoria, 03004
Northern Hospital
Melbourne, Victoria, 03076
Gold Coast Hospital
Southport, Queensland, 04215
Western Health
St Albans, Victoria, 03021
Liverpool Hospital
Sydney, New South Wales, 02170
Perth Blood Institute
West Perth, Western Australia, 06005
Wollongong Hospital - Illawarra Regional Hospital
Wollongong, New South Wales, 02500
France12 sites
Chu Amiens Picardie - Hopital Sud
Amiens, 80054
Chu Angers Hotel Dieu Nord
Angers, 49933
Groupe Bordeaux Nord Aquitaine Gbna Polycliniques - Polyclinique Bordeaux Nord Aquitaine Pbna
Bordeaux, 33000
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Chu Dijon Bourgogne - Hopital Francois Mitterrand
Dijon, 21000
Centre Hospitalier de Versailles - Hopital Andre Mignot
Le Chesnay, 78150
CHU Nantes
Nantes, 44093
Hospital Saint-Louis Service Oncologie Medicale
Paris, 75010
A.P.H. Paris Hopital Cochin
Paris, 75014
Hôpital Pitié Salpêtrière
Paris, 75651
Centre Hospitalier de Pontoise
Pontoise, 95303
Centre Hospitalier Annecy-Genevois
Pringy, 74374
Chru Hopitaux de Tours Hospital Bretonneau
Tours, 37044
Germany12 sites
Klinikum St. Marien Amberg
Amberg, 92224
Klinik Fur Innere Medizin Hamatologie and Onkologie
Berlin, 10967
Universitatsklinikum Essen
Essen, 45147
University Clinic Giessen Und Marburg Ukgm
Giessen, 35392
Universitaetsmedizin Greifswald
Greifswald, 17475
Statistics and Data Corporation (Sdc)
Landshut, 84036
Universitatsmedizin Der Johannes Gutenberg-Universitat Mainz Iii
Mainz, 55131
Medizinische Fakultaet Mannheim Der Universitaet Heidelberg
Mannheim, 68167
Universitatsklinikum Munster
Münster, 48149
Onkologische Schwerpunktpraxis
Oldenburg, 26121
Universitarsfrauenklinik Ulm
Ulm, 89081
Universitaetsklinikum Wuerzburg
Würzburg, 97080
Belgium10 sites
Zna Stuivenberg
Antwerp, 02060
A.Z. St.-Jan-Dienst Hematologie
Bruges, 8000
Institut Jules Bordet
Brussels, 01000
Cliniques Universitaires Ucl Saint-Luc
Brussels, 01200
Universitair Ziekenhuis Antwerpen, Dienst Hematologie
Edegem, 2650
Ghent University Hospital
Ghent, 09000
Universitair Ziekenhuis (Uz) Leuven
Leuven, 03000
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liege - Sart Tilman
Liège, 04000
AZ Delta
Roeselare, 8800
Chu Ucl Namur University Hospital Mont-Godinne
Yvoir, 05530
Israel10 sites
Ha Emek Medical Center
Afula, 18105
Soroka
Bear Sheva
Shamir Medical Center Formerly Assaf Harofeh Medical Center
BEER Yaaqov, 70300
Wolfson
Holon, 5822012
Shaare Zedek Mc
Jerusalem, 9103102
"Laiko" General Hospital of Athens, Hematology of the First Propaedeutic Internal Medicine Clinic
Jerusalem, 91120
Hadassah
Jerusalem, 91120
Meir Medical Center
Kfar Saba, 44281
Rabin Medical Center - Beilinson Hospital
Petah Tikva, 49100
Sheba Medical Center
Tel HaShomer, 5265601
Poland10 sites
Szpital Spec Brzozowiepoland
Brzozów, 36-200
Pratia Poznan
Katowice, 40-519
Pratia McM Krakow
Krakow, 30-225
Sp Zoz Szpital Uniwersytecki
Krakow, 31-501
Uniwersytet Medyczny W Lodzi - Klinika Hematologii
Lodz, 93-510
Samodzielny Publiczny Szpital Kliniczny Nr 1
Lublin, 20-081
Specjalistyczny Szpital Onkologiczny
Tomaszów Mazowiecki, 97-200
Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology
Warsaw, 02-0781
Institute of Hematology and Transfusion Medicine
Warsaw, 02-776
Uniwersytecki Szpital Kliniczny Im. Jana Mikulicza-Radeckiego
Wroclaw, 50-367
Taiwan9 sites
E-Da Hospital
Kaohsiung City, 00824
Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
Kaohsiung City, 00833
Far Eastern Memorial Hospital
New Taipei City, 00220
China Medical University Hospital
Taichung, 40447
National Cheng Kung University (Ncku) Hospital
Tainan, 00704
National Taiwan University Hospital
Taipei, 00100
Tri Service General Hospital
Taipei, 00114
Institutional Review Board Taipei Veterans General Hospital
Taipei, 11217
Hematology and Medical Oncology Too Foundation Sun Yat Sen Cancer Center
Taipei, 11251
United Kingdom8 sites
University Hospitals Birmingham Nhs Foundation Trust
Birmingham, B15 2GW
Bristol Haematology and Oncology Centre
Bristol, BS2 8ED
Leicester Royal Infirmary
Leicester, LE1 5WW
The Royal Marsden Nhs Foundation Trust - Chelsea
London, SW3 6JJ
The Christie Nhs Foundation Trust Uk
Manchester, M20 4BX
James Cook University Hospital
Middlesbrough, TS4 3BW
The Royal Marsden Nhs Foundation Trust - Sutton
Sutton, SM2 5PT
The Royal Wolverhampton Nhs Trust
Wolverhampton, WV10 0QP
Canada7 sites
Cross Cancer Institute
Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 1Z2
Queen Elizabeth Ii Health Sciences Centre
Halifax, Nova Scotia, B3H 2Y9
London Health Sciences Centre
London, Ontario, N6A 5W9
Hospital Maisonneuve Rosemont
Montreal, Quebec, H1T 2M4
McGill University Jewish General Hospital
Montreal, Quebec, H3T 1E2
Chu de Quebec - Universite Laval (Chul)
Québec, Quebec, G1J 1Z4
British Columbia Cancer Agency
Vancouver, British Columbia, V5Z 1L3
Hungary7 sites
Semmelweis Egyetem
Budapest, 01088
National Institute of Oncology
Budapest, 01122
Debreceni Egyetem Klinikai Kozpon Belgyogy Klinika
Debrecen, 04032
Markhot Ferenc Korhaz
Eger, 03300
Petz Aladar County Teaching Hospital
Győr, 09024
Szabolcs-Szatmar-Bereg Megyei Korhazak Es Egyetemi Oktatokorhaz
Nyíregyháza, 04400
University of Szeged
Szeged, 06725
Czechia6 sites
University
Brno, 62500
University Hospital Hradec Kralove
Hradec Králové, 50333
University Hospital Ostrava
Ostrava, 70800
University Hospital Kralovkse Vinohrady
Prague, 10034
Vseobecna Fakultni Nemocnice
Prague, 128 08
University Hospital Motol
Prague, 15000
Switzerland6 sites
University Hospital of Basel Department of Oncology
Basel, 04031
Oncological Institute of Southern Switzerland
Bellinzona, 06500
Inselspital - Universitaetsspital Bern
Bern, 03010
Kantonsspital St. Gallen
Sankt Gallen, 09007
Kantonsspital Winterthur
Winterthur, 08401
Universitatsspital Zurich
Zurich, 08091
Netherlands5 sites
Amsterdam University Medical Centre
Amsterdam, 1105 AZ
Hospital Rijnstate
Arnhem, 6815 AD
Medisch Spectrum Twente
Enschede, 7512 KZ
Medisch Centrum Leeuwarden
Leeuwarden, 8934 AD
HMC
Leidschendam, 2622BA
Austria4 sites
Landeskrankenhaus Universitatsklinikum Graz
Graz, 08036
Innsbruck University Hospital
Innsbruck, 06020
Kepler Universitat Klinikum
Linz, 04020
*Krankenhaus*
Vienna, 01090
Denmark4 sites
Aalborg University Hospital
Aalborg, 09000
Aarhus University Hospital
Aarhus, 08200
Odense University Hospital
Odense, 05000
Sjaellands Universitetshospital Naestved
Roskilde, 04000
Finland4 sites
Kuopio University Hospital
Kuopio, 70210
Oulu University Hospital
Oulu, 90220
Tampere University Hospital
Tampere, 33520
Turku University Hospital
Turku, 20520
Greece4 sites
251 Air Force General Hospital
Athens, 11525
General Hospital of Athens Laiko
Athens, 11527
University Hospital of West Attica - Attikon
Athens, 12462
University General Hospital of Patras
Pátrai, 26504
Sweden3 sites
Karolinska University Hospital Solna
Solna, 17164
Goetalandsregionen - Uddevalla Sjukhus Us
Uddevalla, 451 53
Uppsala Universitet - Akademiska Sjukhuset
Uppsala, 75185
Turkey (Türkiye)3 sites
Hacettepe Universitesi Tip Fakultesi Hastanesi
Ankara, 06100
Ankara University Medical Faculty
Ankara, 06590
Acibadem Maslak Hospital
Istanbul, 34457
Ireland2 sites
Beaumont Hospital
Dublin, D9 V2N0
University Hospital Galway
Galway, H91 YR71
Norway2 sites
Innlandet Hospital Trust
Brumunddal, 02381
Universitetssykehuset I Trondheim - St. Olavs Hospital
Trondheim, 07006
Russia2 sites
Rostov State Medical University
Rostov-on-Don, 344022
Pavlov First Saint Petersburg State Medical University
Saint Petersburg, 196022
Ukraine2 sites
Communal Non-Profit Enterprise Regional Center of Oncology
Kharkiv, 61070
National Cancer Institute of Ministry of Health
Kyiv, 03022
About this study
Official title: A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Tafasitamab Plus Lenalidomide in Addition to Rituximab Versus Lenalidomide in Addition to Rituximab in Patients With Relapsed/Refractory (R/R) Follicular Lymphoma Grade 1 to 3a or R/R Marginal Zone Lymphoma
This is a Phase 3 double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized study designed to investigate whether tafasitamab and lenalidomide as an add-on to rituximab provides improved clinical benefit compared with lenalidomide as an add-on to rituximab in patients with R/R FL Grade 1 to 3a or R/R MZL.
- Conditions
- Follicular Lymphoma, Marginal Zone Lymphoma
- Being tested
- tafasitamab, rituximab, lenalidomide, placebo
- Keywords
- MOR00208, INCMOR00208, tafasitamab
- Medical subject headings
- Lymphoma, Follicular, Lymphoma, B-Cell, Marginal Zone
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
tafasitamabDrug
Also called INCMOR00208, MOR00208
tafasitamab will be administered IV for 12 cycles
rituximabDrug
Rituximab will be administered IV on cycles 1 - 5
lenalidomideDrug
Lenalidomide will be administered PO for 12 cycles
placeboDrug
placebo will be administered IV for 12 cycles
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Arm A : tafasitamab + rituximab + lenalidomide | Experimental | Adult patients with Relapsed/Refractory (R/R) Follicular Lymphoma (FL) Grade 1 to 3a or R/R Marginal Zone Lymphoma (MZL) Receives: Drug: tafasitamab; Drug: rituximab; Drug: lenalidomide |
| Arm B : placebo+rituximab+lenalidomide | Placebo comparator | Adult patients with Relapsed/Refractory (R/R) Follicular Lymphoma (FL) Grade 1 to 3a or R/R Marginal Zone Lymphoma (MZL) Receives: Drug: rituximab; Drug: lenalidomide; Drug: placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
FL Population: Progression-free Survival (PFS) by Investigator Assessment, Using the Lugano 2014 Criteria, Defined as the Time From Randomization to the First Documented Disease Progression (PD), or Death From Any Cause, Whichever Occurred First
PD, positron emission tomography (PET): score 4 (uptake moderately > liver) or 5 (uptake markedly higher than liver and/or new lesions) for lymph node/extra lymphatic sites with increase in intensity of Baseline uptake and/or new fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-avid foci consistent with lymphoma at interim/end-of-treatment assessment; new/recurrent FDG-avid foci in bone marrow; new FDG-avid foci consistent with lymphoma versus other etiology in new lesions. PD, computed tomography (CT): abnormal individual node/lesion with longest diameter (LDi ) >1.5 centimeters (cm) and increase by ≥50% from the product of the perpendicular diameters (PPD) nadir and increase in LDi or shortest diameter (SDi) from nadir; new/clear progression of preexisting nontarget lesions; new/recurrent splenomegaly and bone marrow involvement; regrowth of previously resolved lesions. New node >1.5 cm in any axis. New extranodal site >1.0 cm in any axis; if <1.0 cm, presence is unequivocal and attributable to lymphoma.
Measured: up to approximately 34 months
FL Population: Kaplan-Meier Estimates of PFS by Investigator Assessment, Using the Lugano 2014 Criteria, Defined as the Time From Randomization to the First Documented PD, or Death From Any Cause, Whichever Occurred First
PD, PET: score 4 (uptake moderately > liver) or 5 (uptake markedly higher than liver and/or new lesions) for lymph node/extra lymphatic sites with increase in intensity of Baseline uptake and/or new FDG-avid foci consistent with lymphoma at interim/end-of-treatment assessment; new/recurrent FDG-avid foci in bone marrow; new FDG-avid foci consistent with lymphoma versus other etiology in new lesions. PD, CT: abnormal individual node/lesion with LDi >1.5 cm and increase by ≥50% from the PPD nadir and increase in LDi or SDi from nadir; new/clear progression of preexisting nontarget lesions; new/recurrent splenomegaly and bone marrow involvement; regrowth of previously resolved lesions. New node >1.5 cm in any axis. New extranodal site >1.0 cm in any axis; if <1.0 cm, presence is unequivocal and attributable to lymphoma. Kaplan-Meier estimates indicate the percent probability of a participant being alive at the indicated time after treatment start.
Measured: up to 2 years
Secondary outcomes (34)
Overall Population: PFS by Investigator Assessment, Using the Lugano 2014 Criteria, Defined as the Time From Randomization to the First Documented PD, or Death From Any Cause, Whichever Occurred First
PD, PET: score 4 (uptake moderately > liver) or 5 (uptake markedly higher than liver and/or new lesions) for lymph node/extra lymphatic sites with increase in intensity of Baseline uptake and/or new FDG-avid foci consistent with lymphoma at interim/end-of-treatment assessment; new/recurrent FDG-avid foci in bone marrow; new FDG-avid foci consistent with lymphoma versus other etiology in new lesions. PD, CT: abnormal individual node/lesion with LDi >1.5 cm and increase by ≥50% from the PPD nadir and increase in LDi or SDi from nadir; new/clear progression of preexisting nontarget lesions; new/recurrent splenomegaly and bone marrow involvement; regrowth of previously resolved lesions. New node >1.5 cm in any axis. New extranodal site >1.0 cm in any axis; if <1.0 cm, presence is unequivocal and attributable to lymphoma.
Measured: up to approximately 34 months
Overall Population: Kaplan-Meier Estimates of PFS by Investigator Assessment, Using the Lugano 2014 Criteria, Defined as the Time From Randomization to the First Documented PD, or Death From Any Cause, Whichever Occurred First
PD, PET: score 4 (uptake moderately > liver) or 5 (uptake markedly higher than liver and/or new lesions) for lymph node/extra lymphatic sites with increase in intensity of Baseline uptake and/or new FDG-avid foci consistent with lymphoma at interim/end-of-treatment assessment; new/recurrent FDG-avid foci in bone marrow; new FDG-avid foci consistent with lymphoma versus other etiology in new lesions. PD, CT: abnormal individual node/lesion with LDi >1.5 cm and increase by ≥50% from the PPD nadir and increase in LDi or SDi from nadir; new/clear progression of preexisting nontarget lesions; new/recurrent splenomegaly and bone marrow involvement; regrowth of previously resolved lesions. New node >1.5 cm in any axis. New extranodal site >1.0 cm in any axis; if <1.0 cm, presence is unequivocal and attributable to lymphoma. Kaplan-Meier estimates indicate the percent probability of a participant being alive at the indicated time after treatment start.
Measured: up to 2 years
FDG-avid FL Population: Positron Emission Tomography-Complete Response (PET-CR) Rate by Investigator Assessment, Using the Lugano 2014 Criteria
CR was defined as a complete metabolic response at any time after the start of treatment. Per PET, CR criteria: (1) score of 1, 2, or 3 with or without a residual mass on a 5-point scale for lymph nodes and extralymphatic sites; (2) No evidence of FDG-avid disease in bone marrow; and (3) no new lesions. PET 5-point scale: 1 = no uptake above background; 2 = uptake ≤ mediastinum; 3 = uptake > mediastinum but ≤ liver; 4 = uptake moderately > liver; 5 = uptake markedly higher than liver and/or new lesions; X = new areas of uptake unlikely to be related to lymphoma.
Measured: up to approximately 34 months
FL Population: Overall Survival
Overall survival was defined as the time from randomization until death from any cause.
Measured: up to approximately 34 months
FL Population: Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Overall Survival
Overall survival was defined as the time from randomization until death from any cause. Kaplan-Meier estimates indicate the percent probability of a participant being alive at the indicated time after treatment start.
Measured: up to 2 years
FDG-avid Overall Population: PET-CR Rate by Investigator Assessment, Using the Lugano 2014 Criteria
CR was defined as a complete metabolic response at any time after the start of treatment. Per PET, CR criteria: (1) score of 1, 2, or 3 with or without a residual mass on a 5-point scale for lymph nodes and extralymphatic sites; (2) No evidence of FDG-avid disease in bone marrow; and (3) no new lesions. PET 5-point scale: 1 = no uptake above background; 2 = uptake ≤ mediastinum; 3 = uptake > mediastinum but ≤ liver; 4 = uptake moderately > liver; 5 = uptake markedly higher than liver and/or new lesions; X = new areas of uptake unlikely to be related to lymphoma. The Overall FDG-avid Set included all randomized participants with a PET scan at Baseline with a resulting Deauville score of 4 or 5.
Measured: up to approximately 34 months
FL Population: Minimal Residual Disease (MRD)-Negativity Rate (at Threshold of 10^-5) at End of Treatment
The MRD-negativity rate was defined as the percentage of participants who achieved a negative MRD result in peripheral blood at the End of Treatment. The threshold used for the analysis was 10^-5 cells. MRD status was only analyzed with a threshold of ≤10^-5 cells for MRD negativity.
Measured: up to approximately 34 months
Overall Population: MRD-negativity Rate (at Threshold of 10-5) at End of Treatment
The MRD-negativity rate was defined as the percentage of participants who achieved a negative MRD result in peripheral blood at the End of Treatment. The threshold used for the analysis was 10^-5 cells. MRD status was only analyzed with a threshold of ≤10^-5 cells for MRD negativity. The Overall MRD Blood-Evaluable Set included all participants in the Full Analysis Set who received at least 1 dose of study treatment with identifiable clonality in blood samples at Cycle 1 Day 1.
Measured: up to approximately 34 months
FL Population: Overall Response Rate (Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a CR/PR Per the Lugano Classification at Any Time During the Study But Before the First PD and Before/at the Start of a New Antilymphoma Treatment) by Investigator Assessment
PET, CR: (1) score of 1 (no uptake above background), 2 (uptake ≤ mediastinum), or 3 (uptake > mediastinum but ≤ liver) with/without a residual mass for lymph nodes and extralymphatic sites (LN/ELS); (2) no evidence of FDG-avid disease in bone marrow; (3) no new lesions. PR: (1) score of 4 (uptake moderately > liver) or 5 (uptake markedly higher than liver and/or new lesions) with reduced uptake compared with Baseline and residual mass(es) of any size for LN/ELS; (2) residual uptake higher than in normal bone marrow but reduced from Baseline; (3) no new lesions. CT, CR: (1) target nodes/nodal masses regressed to ≤1.5 cm in LDi. no extra lymphatic site of disease; (2) absent nontarget lesions; (3) liver/spleen regressed to normal; (4) bone marrow normal by morphology; (5) no new lesions. PR: (1) ≥50% decrease in SPD of up to 6 target measurable nodes and extranodal sites; (2) no increase in target lesions; (3) spleen regressed by >50% in length beyond normal; (4) no new lesions.
Measured: up to approximately 34 months
Overall Population: Overall Response Rate (Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a CR/PR Per Lugano Classification at Any Time During the Study But Before the First PD and Before/at the Start of a New Antilymphoma Treatment) by Investigator Assessment
PET, CR: (1) score of 1 (no uptake above background), 2 (uptake ≤ mediastinum), or 3 (uptake > mediastinum but ≤ liver) with/without a residual mass for lymph nodes and extralymphatic sites (LN/ELS); (2) no evidence of FDG-avid disease in bone marrow; (3) no new lesions. PR: (1) score of 4 (uptake moderately > liver) or 5 (uptake markedly higher than liver and/or new lesions) with reduced uptake compared with Baseline and residual mass(es) of any size for LN/ELS; (2) residual uptake higher than in normal bone marrow but reduced from Baseline; (3) no new lesions. CT, CR: (1) target nodes/nodal masses regressed to ≤1.5 cm in LDi. no extra lymphatic site of disease; (2) absent nontarget lesions; (3) liver/spleen regressed to normal; (4) bone marrow normal by morphology; (5) no new lesions. PR: (1) ≥50% decrease in SPD of up to 6 target measurable nodes and extranodal sites; (2) no increase in target lesions; (3) spleen regressed by >50% in length beyond normal; (4) no new lesions.
Measured: up to approximately 34 months
FL Population: Duration of Response (DOR; the Time From the First Tumor Response [CR or PR as Per the Lugano 2014 Classification] Until the Time of the First Documented PD or Death From Any Cause, Whichever Was Earlier) by Investigator Assessment
PET, CR: (1) score of 1 (no uptake above background), 2 (uptake ≤ mediastinum), or 3 (uptake > mediastinum but ≤ liver) with/without a residual mass for lymph nodes and extralymphatic sites (LN/ELS); (2) no evidence of FDG-avid disease in bone marrow; (3) no new lesions. PR: (1) score of 4 (uptake moderately > liver) or 5 (uptake markedly higher than liver and/or new lesions) with reduced uptake compared with Baseline and residual mass(es) of any size for LN/ELS; (2) residual uptake higher than in normal bone marrow but reduced from Baseline; (3) no new lesions. CT, CR: (1) target nodes/nodal masses regressed to ≤1.5 cm in LDi. no extra lymphatic site of disease; (2) absent nontarget lesions; (3) liver/spleen regressed to normal; (4) bone marrow normal by morphology; (5) no new lesions. PR: (1) ≥50% decrease in SPD of up to 6 target measurable nodes and extranodal sites; (2) no increase in target lesions; (3) spleen regressed by >50% in length beyond normal; (4) no new lesions.
Measured: up to approximately 34 months
FL Population: Kaplan-Meier Estimates of DOR (the Time From the First Tumor Response [CR or PR as Per the Lugano 2014 Classification] Until the Time of the First Documented PD or Death From Any Cause, Whichever Was Earlier) by Investigator Assessment
PET, CR: (1) score of 1 (no uptake above background), 2 (uptake ≤ mediastinum), or 3 (uptake > mediastinum but ≤ liver) with/without a residual mass for lymph nodes and extralymphatic sites (LN/ELS); (2) no evidence of FDG-avid disease in bone marrow; (3) no new lesions. PR: (1) score of 4 (uptake moderately > liver) or 5 (uptake markedly higher than liver and/or new lesions) with reduced uptake compared with Baseline and residual mass(es) of any size for LN/ELS; (2) residual uptake higher than in normal bone marrow but reduced from Baseline; (3) no new lesions. CT, CR: (1) target nodes/nodal masses regressed to ≤1.5 cm in LDi. no extra lymphatic site of disease; (2) absent nontarget lesions; (3) liver/spleen regressed to normal; (4) bone marrow normal by morphology; (5) no new lesions. PR: (1) ≥50% decrease in SPD of up to 6 target measurable nodes and extranodal sites; (2) no increase in target lesions; (3) spleen regressed by >50% in length beyond normal; (4) no new lesions.
Measured: up to 2 years
Overall Population: DOR (the Time From the First Tumor Response [CR or PR as Per the Lugano 2014 Classification] Until the Time of the First Documented PD or Death From Any Cause, Whichever Was Earlier) by Investigator Assessment
PET, CR: (1) score of 1 (no uptake above background), 2 (uptake ≤ mediastinum), or 3 (uptake > mediastinum but ≤ liver) with/without a residual mass for lymph nodes and extralymphatic sites (LN/ELS); (2) no evidence of FDG-avid disease in bone marrow; (3) no new lesions. PR: (1) score of 4 (uptake moderately > liver) or 5 (uptake markedly higher than liver and/or new lesions) with reduced uptake compared with Baseline and residual mass(es) of any size for LN/ELS; (2) residual uptake higher than in normal bone marrow but reduced from Baseline; (3) no new lesions. CT, CR: (1) target nodes/nodal masses regressed to ≤1.5 cm in LDi. no extra lymphatic site of disease; (2) absent nontarget lesions; (3) liver/spleen regressed to normal; (4) bone marrow normal by morphology; (5) no new lesions. PR: (1) ≥50% decrease in SPD of up to 6 target measurable nodes and extranodal sites; (2) no increase in target lesions; (3) spleen regressed by >50% in length beyond normal; (4) no new lesions.
Measured: up to approximately 34 months
Overall Population: Kaplan-Meier Estimates of DOR (the Time From the First Tumor Response [CR or PR as Per the Lugano 2014 Classification] Until the Time of the First Documented PD or Death From Any Cause, Whichever Was Earlier) by Investigator Assessment
PET, CR: (1) score of 1 (no uptake above background), 2 (uptake ≤ mediastinum), or 3 (uptake > mediastinum but ≤ liver) with/without a residual mass for lymph nodes and extralymphatic sites (LN/ELS); (2) no evidence of FDG-avid disease in bone marrow; (3) no new lesions. PR: (1) score of 4 (uptake moderately > liver) or 5 (uptake markedly higher than liver and/or new lesions) with reduced uptake compared with Baseline and residual mass(es) of any size for LN/ELS; (2) residual uptake higher than in normal bone marrow but reduced from Baseline; (3) no new lesions. CT, CR: (1) target nodes/nodal masses regressed to ≤1.5 cm in LDi. no extra lymphatic site of disease; (2) absent nontarget lesions; (3) liver/spleen regressed to normal; (4) bone marrow normal by morphology; (5) no new lesions. PR: (1) ≥50% decrease in SPD of up to 6 target measurable nodes and extranodal sites; (2) no increase in target lesions; (3) spleen regressed by >50% in length beyond normal; (4) no new lesions.
Measured: up to 2 years
Overall Population: Overall Survival
Overall survival was defined as the time from randomization until death from any cause.
Measured: up to approximately 34 months
Overall Population: Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Overall Survival
Overall survival was defined as the time from randomization until death from any cause. Kaplan-Meier estimates indicate the percent probability of a participant being alive at the indicated time after treatment start.
Measured: up to 2 years
FL Population: PFS by IRC Review, Using the Lugano 2014 Criteria, Defined as the Time From Randomization to the First Documented PD, or Death From Any Cause, Whichever Occurred First
PD, PET: score 4 (uptake moderately > liver) or 5 (uptake markedly higher than liver and/or new lesions) for lymph node/extra lymphatic sites with increase in intensity of Baseline uptake and/or new FDG-avid foci consistent with lymphoma at interim/end-of-treatment assessment; new/recurrent FDG-avid foci in bone marrow; new FDG-avid foci consistent with lymphoma versus other etiology in new lesions. PD, CT: abnormal individual node/lesion with LDi >1.5 cm and increase by ≥50% from the PPD nadir and increase in LDi or SDi from nadir; new/clear progression of preexisting nontarget lesions; new/recurrent splenomegaly and bone marrow involvement; regrowth of previously resolved lesions. New node >1.5 cm in any axis. New extranodal site >1.0 cm in any axis; if <1.0 cm, presence is unequivocal and attributable to lymphoma.
Measured: up to approximately 34 months
FL Population: Kaplan-Meier Estimates of PFS by IRC Review, Using the Lugano 2014 Criteria, Defined as the Time From Randomization to the First Documented PD, or Death From Any Cause, Whichever Occurred First
PD, PET: score 4 (uptake moderately > liver) or 5 (uptake markedly higher than liver and/or new lesions) for lymph node/extra lymphatic sites with increase in intensity of Baseline uptake and/or new FDG-avid foci consistent with lymphoma at interim/end-of-treatment assessment; new/recurrent FDG-avid foci in bone marrow; new FDG-avid foci consistent with lymphoma versus other etiology in new lesions. PD, CT: abnormal individual node/lesion with LDi >1.5 cm and increase by ≥50% from the PPD nadir and increase in LDi or SDi from nadir; new/clear progression of preexisting nontarget lesions; new/recurrent splenomegaly and bone marrow involvement; regrowth of previously resolved lesions. New node >1.5 cm in any axis. New extranodal site >1.0 cm in any axis; if <1.0 cm, presence is unequivocal and attributable to lymphoma. Kaplan-Meier estimates indicate the percent probability of a participant being alive at the indicated time after treatment start.
Measured: up to 2 years
Overall Population: PFS by IRC Review, Using the Lugano 2014 Criteria, Defined as the Time From Randomization to the First Documented PD, or Death From Any Cause, Whichever Occurred First
PD, PET: score 4 (uptake moderately > liver) or 5 (uptake markedly higher than liver and/or new lesions) for lymph node/extra lymphatic sites with increase in intensity of Baseline uptake and/or new FDG-avid foci consistent with lymphoma at interim/end-of-treatment assessment; new/recurrent FDG-avid foci in bone marrow; new FDG-avid foci consistent with lymphoma versus other etiology in new lesions. PD, CT: abnormal individual node/lesion with LDi >1.5 cm and increase by ≥50% from the PPD nadir and increase in LDi or SDi from nadir; new/clear progression of preexisting nontarget lesions; new/recurrent splenomegaly and bone marrow involvement; regrowth of previously resolved lesions. New node >1.5 cm in any axis. New extranodal site >1.0 cm in any axis; if <1.0 cm, presence is unequivocal and attributable to lymphoma.
Measured: up to approximately 34 months
Overall Population: Kaplan-Meier Estimates of PFS by IRC Review, Using the Lugano 2014 Criteria, Defined as the Time From Randomization to the First Documented PD, or Death From Any Cause, Whichever Occurred First
PD, PET: score 4 (uptake moderately > liver) or 5 (uptake markedly higher than liver and/or new lesions) for lymph node/extra lymphatic sites with increase in intensity of Baseline uptake and/or new FDG-avid foci consistent with lymphoma at interim/end-of-treatment assessment; new/recurrent FDG-avid foci in bone marrow; new FDG-avid foci consistent with lymphoma versus other etiology in new lesions. PD, CT: abnormal individual node/lesion with LDi >1.5 cm and increase by ≥50% from the PPD nadir and increase in LDi or SDi from nadir; new/clear progression of preexisting nontarget lesions; new/recurrent splenomegaly and bone marrow involvement; regrowth of previously resolved lesions. New node >1.5 cm in any axis. New extranodal site >1.0 cm in any axis; if <1.0 cm, presence is unequivocal and attributable to lymphoma. Kaplan-Meier estimates indicate the percent probability of a participant being alive at the indicated time after treatment start.
Measured: up to 2 years
FL Population: Overall Response Rate (Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a CR/PR Per the Lugano Classification at Any Time During the Study But Before the First PD and Before/at the Start of a New Antilymphoma Treatment) by IRC Review
PET, CR: (1) score of 1 (no uptake above background), 2 (uptake ≤ mediastinum), or 3 (uptake > mediastinum but ≤ liver) with/without a residual mass for lymph nodes and extralymphatic sites (LN/ELS); (2) no evidence of FDG-avid disease in bone marrow; (3) no new lesions. PR: (1) score of 4 (uptake moderately > liver) or 5 (uptake markedly higher than liver and/or new lesions) with reduced uptake compared with Baseline and residual mass(es) of any size for LN/ELS; (2) residual uptake higher than in normal bone marrow but reduced from Baseline; (3) no new lesions. CT, CR: (1) target nodes/nodal masses regressed to ≤1.5 cm in LDi. no extra lymphatic site of disease; (2) absent nontarget lesions; (3) liver/spleen regressed to normal; (4) bone marrow normal by morphology; (5) no new lesions. PR: (1) ≥50% decrease in SPD of up to 6 target measurable nodes and extranodal sites; (2) no increase in target lesions; (3) spleen regressed by >50% in length beyond normal; (4) no new lesions.
Measured: up to approximately 34 months
Overall Population: Overall Response Rate (Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a CR/PR Per Lugano Classification at Any Time During the Study But Before the First PD and Before/at the Start of a New Antilymphoma Treatment) by IRC Review
PET, CR: (1) score of 1 (no uptake above background), 2 (uptake ≤ mediastinum), or 3 (uptake > mediastinum but ≤ liver) with/without a residual mass for lymph nodes and extralymphatic sites (LN/ELS); (2) no evidence of FDG-avid disease in bone marrow; (3) no new lesions. PR: (1) score of 4 (uptake moderately > liver) or 5 (uptake markedly higher than liver and/or new lesions) with reduced uptake compared with Baseline and residual mass(es) of any size for LN/ELS; (2) residual uptake higher than in normal bone marrow but reduced from Baseline; (3) no new lesions. CT, CR: (1) target nodes/nodal masses regressed to ≤1.5 cm in LDi. no extra lymphatic site of disease; (2) absent nontarget lesions; (3) liver/spleen regressed to normal; (4) bone marrow normal by morphology; (5) no new lesions. PR: (1) ≥50% decrease in SPD of up to 6 target measurable nodes and extranodal sites; (2) no increase in target lesions; (3) spleen regressed by >50% in length beyond normal; (4) no new lesions.
Measured: up to approximately 34 months
FL Population: DOR the Time From the First Tumor Response [CR or PR as Per the Lugano 2014 Classification] Until the Time of the First Documented PD or Death From Any Cause, Whichever Was Earlier) by IRC Review
PET, CR: (1) score of 1 (no uptake above background), 2 (uptake ≤ mediastinum), or 3 (uptake > mediastinum but ≤ liver) with/without a residual mass for lymph nodes and extralymphatic sites (LN/ELS); (2) no evidence of FDG-avid disease in bone marrow; (3) no new lesions. PR: (1) score of 4 (uptake moderately > liver) or 5 (uptake markedly higher than liver and/or new lesions) with reduced uptake compared with Baseline and residual mass(es) of any size for LN/ELS; (2) residual uptake higher than in normal bone marrow but reduced from Baseline; (3) no new lesions. CT, CR: (1) target nodes/nodal masses regressed to ≤1.5 cm in LDi. no extra lymphatic site of disease; (2) absent nontarget lesions; (3) liver/spleen regressed to normal; (4) bone marrow normal by morphology; (5) no new lesions. PR: (1) ≥50% decrease in SPD of up to 6 target measurable nodes and extranodal sites; (2) no increase in target lesions; (3) spleen regressed by >50% in length beyond normal; (4) no new lesions.
Measured: up to approximately 34 months
FL Population: Kaplan-Meier Estimates of DOR (the Time From the First Tumor Response [CR or PR as Per the Lugano 2014 Classification] Until the Time of the First Documented PD or Death From Any Cause, Whichever Was Earlier) by IRC Review
PET, CR: (1) score of 1 (no uptake above background), 2 (uptake ≤ mediastinum), or 3 (uptake > mediastinum but ≤ liver) with/without a residual mass for lymph nodes and extralymphatic sites (LN/ELS); (2) no evidence of FDG-avid disease in bone marrow; (3) no new lesions. PR: (1) score of 4 (uptake moderately > liver) or 5 (uptake markedly higher than liver and/or new lesions) with reduced uptake compared with Baseline and residual mass(es) of any size for LN/ELS; (2) residual uptake higher than in normal bone marrow but reduced from Baseline; (3) no new lesions. CT, CR: (1) target nodes/nodal masses regressed to ≤1.5 cm in LDi. no extra lymphatic site of disease; (2) absent nontarget lesions; (3) liver/spleen regressed to normal; (4) bone marrow normal by morphology; (5) no new lesions. PR: (1) ≥50% decrease in SPD of up to 6 target measurable nodes and extranodal sites; (2) no increase in target lesions; (3) spleen regressed by >50% in length beyond normal; (4) no new lesions.
Measured: up to 2 years
Overall Population: DOR (the Time From the First Tumor Response [CR or PR as Per the Lugano 2014 Classification] Until the Time of the First Documented PD or Death From Any Cause, Whichever Was Earlier) by IRC Review
PET, CR: (1) score of 1 (no uptake above background), 2 (uptake ≤ mediastinum), or 3 (uptake > mediastinum but ≤ liver) with/without a residual mass for lymph nodes and extralymphatic sites (LN/ELS); (2) no evidence of FDG-avid disease in bone marrow; (3) no new lesions. PR: (1) score of 4 (uptake moderately > liver) or 5 (uptake markedly higher than liver and/or new lesions) with reduced uptake compared with Baseline and residual mass(es) of any size for LN/ELS; (2) residual uptake higher than in normal bone marrow but reduced from Baseline; (3) no new lesions. CT, CR: (1) target nodes/nodal masses regressed to ≤1.5 cm in LDi. no extra lymphatic site of disease; (2) absent nontarget lesions; (3) liver/spleen regressed to normal; (4) bone marrow normal by morphology; (5) no new lesions. PR: (1) ≥50% decrease in SPD of up to 6 target measurable nodes and extranodal sites; (2) no increase in target lesions; (3) spleen regressed by >50% in length beyond normal; (4) no new lesions.
Measured: up to approximately 34 months
Overall Population: Kaplan-Meier Estimates of DOR (the Time From the First Tumor Response [CR or PR as Per the Lugano 2014 Classification] Until the Time of the First Documented PD or Death From Any Cause, Whichever Was Earlier) by IRC Review
PET, CR: (1) score of 1 (no uptake above background), 2 (uptake ≤ mediastinum), or 3 (uptake > mediastinum but ≤ liver) with/without a residual mass for lymph nodes and extralymphatic sites (LN/ELS); (2) no evidence of FDG-avid disease in bone marrow; (3) no new lesions. PR: (1) score of 4 (uptake moderately > liver) or 5 (uptake markedly higher than liver and/or new lesions) with reduced uptake compared with Baseline and residual mass(es) of any size for LN/ELS; (2) residual uptake higher than in normal bone marrow but reduced from Baseline; (3) no new lesions. CT, CR: (1) target nodes/nodal masses regressed to ≤1.5 cm in LDi. no extra lymphatic site of disease; (2) absent nontarget lesions; (3) liver/spleen regressed to normal; (4) bone marrow normal by morphology; (5) no new lesions. PR: (1) ≥50% decrease in SPD of up to 6 target measurable nodes and extranodal sites; (2) no increase in target lesions; (3) spleen regressed by >50% in length beyond normal; (4) no new lesions.
Measured: up to 2 years
FL Population: EORTC QLQ-C30 Scores at Baseline and End of Treatment
The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) version 3 is a 30-item scale composed of both multi-item scales and single-item measures. These include 5 functional scales (physical functioning, role, cognitive functioning, emotional functioning, and social functioning), 3 symptom scales (fatigue, pain, and nausea/vomiting), a global health status scale, and 6 single items (constipation, diarrhea, sleep, dyspnea, appetite, financial). All scales and single-item measures range in score from 0 to 100. A high scale score represents a higher response level. Therefore, a high score for a functional scale represents a high/healthy level of functioning and a high score for the global health status/QoL represents a high QoL. A high score for a symptom scale/item represents a high level of symptomatology/problems. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value.
Measured: up to approximately 34 months
Overall Population: EORTC QLQ-C30 Scores at Baseline and End of Treatment
The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) version 3 is a 30-item scale composed of both multi-item scales and single-item measures. These include 5 functional scales (physical functioning, role, cognitive functioning, emotional functioning, and social functioning), 3 symptom scales (fatigue, pain, and nausea/vomiting), a global health status scale, and 6 single items (constipation, diarrhea, sleep, dyspnea, appetite, financial). All scales and single-item measures range in score from 0 to 100. A high scale score represents a higher response level. Therefore, a high score for a functional scale represents a high/healthy level of functioning and a high score for the global health status/QoL represents a high QoL. A high score for a symptom scale/item represents a high level of symptomatology/problems. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value.
Measured: up to approximately 34 months
FL Population: Health State EQ-5D-5L Scores at Baseline and End of Treatment
The EQ-5D-5L contains a participant-reported score regarding health state measured on a visual analog scale (scores range from 0 [worst imaginable health state] to 100 [best imaginable health state]), and 5 questions on mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. The 5 questions have 5 response levels: 1, no problems; 2, slight problems; 3, moderate problems; 4, severe problems; and 5, unable to/extreme problems.
Measured: up to approximately 34 months
Overall Population: Health State EQ-5D-5L Scores at Baseline and End of Treatment
The EQ-5D-5L contains a participant-reported score regarding health state measured on a visual analog scale (scores range from 0 [worst imaginable health state] to 100 [best imaginable health state]), and 5 questions on mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. The 5 questions have 5 response levels: 1, no problems; 2, slight problems; 3, moderate problems; 4, severe problems; and 5, unable to/extreme problems.
Measured: up to approximately 34 months
FL Population: Number of Participants With the Indicated Scores for the Five EQ-5D-5L Domains/Questions at Baseline and End of Treatment
The EQ-5D-5L contains a participant-reported score regarding health state measured on a visual analog scale (scores range from 0 [worst imaginable health state] to 100 [best imaginable health state]), and 5 questions on mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. The 5 questions have 5 response levels: 1, no problems; 2, slight problems; 3, moderate problems; 4, severe problems; and 5, unable to/extreme problems.
Measured: up to approximately 34 months
Overall Population: Number of Participants With the Indicated Scores for the Five EQ-5D-5L Domains/Questions at Baseline and End of Treatment
The EQ-5D-5L contains a participant-reported score regarding health state measured on a visual analog scale (scores range from 0 [worst imaginable health state] to 100 [best imaginable health state]), and 5 questions on mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. The 5 questions have 5 response levels: 1, no problems; 2, slight problems; 3, moderate problems; 4, severe problems; and 5, unable to/extreme problems.
Measured: up to approximately 34 months
FL Population: Functional Assessment of Cancer Treatment-Lymphoma (FACT-Lym) Scores at Baseline and End of Treatment
The FACT-Lymphoma (v4) is composed of 42 items with a 5-point Likert-type scale and 5 subscales. Physical well-being (PWB) subscale: 7 items measured on 0- to 4-point scale; total score = 0-28. Social/family well-being (SWB) subscale: 7 items measured on 0- to 4-point scale; total score = 0-28. Emotional well-being (EWB) subscale: 6 items measured on 0- to 4-point scale; total score = 0-24. Functional well-being (FWB) subscale: 7 items measured on 0- to 4-point scale; total score = 0-28. Lymphoma (LymS) subscale includes 15 items; total score = 0-60. Three total scores can be derived by adding the subscales: FACT-Lymphoma Trial Outcome Index (TOI): (PWB score) + (FWB score) + (LymS score); total score = 0-116. FACT-G total score: (PWB score) + (SWB score) + (EWB score) + (FWB score); total score = 0-108. FACT-Lymphoma total score: (PWB score) + (SWB score) + (EWB score) + (FWB score) + (LymS score); total score = 0-168. The higher the score, the better the quality of life.
Measured: up to approximately 34 months
Overall Population: FACT-Lym Scores at Baseline and End of Treatment
The FACT-Lymphoma (v4) is composed of 42 items with a 5-point Likert-type scale and 5 subscales. Physical well-being (PWB) subscale: 7 items measured on 0- to 4-point scale; total score = 0-28. Social/family well-being (SWB) subscale: 7 items measured on 0- to 4-point scale; total score = 0-28. Emotional well-being (EWB) subscale: 6 items measured on 0- to 4-point scale; total score = 0-24. Functional well-being (FWB) subscale: 7 items measured on 0- to 4-point scale; total score = 0-28. Lymphoma (LymS) subscale includes 15 items; total score = 0-60. Three total scores can be derived by adding the subscales: FACT-Lymphoma Trial Outcome Index (TOI): (PWB score) + (FWB score) + (LymS score); total score = 0-116. FACT-G total score: (PWB score) + (SWB score) + (EWB score) + (FWB score); total score = 0-108. FACT-Lymphoma total score: (PWB score) + (SWB score) + (EWB score) + (FWB score) + (LymS score); total score = 0-168. The higher the score, the better the quality of life.
Measured: up to approximately 34 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted22 Dec 2020
- Study start15 Apr 2021
- Primary completion23 Feb 2024
- Study completion9 Aug 2028 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Follicular LymphomaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Incyte CorporationThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 654 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Incyte Corporation
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04680052
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- INCMOR 0208-301
- Other IDs
- 2023-504684-16-00, 2020-004407-13, 2023
- Acronym
- InMIND
- Status last verified
- Aug 2026
- First submitted
- 17 Dec 2020
- Last updated
- 4 Sep 2026
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Incyte shares data with qualified external researchers after a research proposal is submitted. These requests are reviewed and approved by a review panel on the basis of scientific merit. All data provided is anonymized to respect the privacy of patients who have participated in the trial in line with applicable laws and regulations. The trial data availability is according to the criteria and process described on https://www.incyte.com/our-company/compliance-and-transparency
Publications
Sehn LH, Hubel K, Luminari S, Scholz CW, Salar A, Paneesha S, Wahlin BE, Panayiotidis P, Lee HP, Jimenez-Ubieto A, Sancho JM, Kim TM, Domingo Domenech E, Kumode T, Poh C, Thieblemont C, Deeren D, de Wit E, Arbushites M, Vassallo I, Trneny M; inMIND Study team. Tafasitamab, lenalidomide, and rituximab in relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma (inMIND): a global, phase 3, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2026 Jan 10;407(10524):133-146. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(25)01778-7. Epub 2025 Dec 5.
PubMed 41360064
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 4 Sep 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Tafasitamab Plus Lenalidomide in Addition to Rituximab Versus Lenalidomide in Addition to Rituximab in Patients With Relapsed/Refractory (R/R) Follicular Lymphoma Grade 1 to 3a or R/R Marginal Zone Lymphoma
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04680052
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- InMIND / INCMOR 0208-301
- Conditions
- Follicular Lymphoma, Marginal Zone Lymphoma
- Keywords
- MOR00208, INCMOR00208, tafasitamab
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Active, not recruiting
- Enrolment
- 654 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Incyte CorporationIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 15 Apr 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 23 Feb 2024 (actual)
- Study completion
- 9 Aug 2028 (estimated)
- First posted
- 22 Dec 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 4 Apr 2025
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This is a Phase 3 double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized study designed to investigate whether tafasitamab and lenalidomide as an add-on to rituximab provides improved clinical benefit compared with lenalidomide as an add-on to rituximab in patients with R/R FL Grade 1 to 3a or R/R MZL.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Arm A : tafasitamab + rituximab + lenalidomide | Experimental | Drug: tafasitamab, Drug: rituximab, Drug: lenalidomideAdult patients with Relapsed/Refractory (R/R) Follicular Lymphoma (FL) Grade 1 to 3a or R/R Marginal Zone Lymphoma (MZL) |
| Arm B : placebo+rituximab+lenalidomide | Placebo comparator | Drug: rituximab, Drug: lenalidomide, Drug: placeboAdult patients with Relapsed/Refractory (R/R) Follicular Lymphoma (FL) Grade 1 to 3a or R/R Marginal Zone Lymphoma (MZL) |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Histologically confirmed Grade 1, 2, or 3a FL or nodal MZL, splenic MZL, or extra nodal MZL
- Willingness to avoid pregnancy or fathering children
- In the opinion of the investigator, be able and willing to receive adequate mandatory prophylaxis and/or therapy for thromboembolic events (eg, aspirin 70-325 mg daily or low-molecular-weight heparin)
- Previously treated with at least 1 prior systemic anti-CD20 immunotherapy or chemo-immunotherapy
- Documented relapsed, refractory, or PD after treatment with systemic therapy
Key exclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Women who are pregnant or breastfeeding.
- Any histology other than FL and MZL or clinical evidence of transformed lymphoma
- Prior non-hematologic malignancy
- Congestive heart failure
- HCV positivity, chronic HBV infection or history of HIV infection
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| tafasitamabAlso: INCMOR00208, MOR00208tafasitamab will be administered IV for 12 cycles | Drug | Arm A : tafasitamab + rituximab + lenalidomide |
| rituximabRituximab will be administered IV on cycles 1 - 5 | Drug | Arm A : tafasitamab + rituximab + lenalidomide, Arm B : placebo+rituximab+lenalidomide |
| lenalidomideLenalidomide will be administered PO for 12 cycles | Drug | Arm A : tafasitamab + rituximab + lenalidomide, Arm B : placebo+rituximab+lenalidomide |
| placeboplacebo will be administered IV for 12 cycles | Drug | Arm B : placebo+rituximab+lenalidomide |
Primary outcome
FL Population: Progression-free Survival (PFS) by Investigator Assessment, Using the Lugano 2014 Criteria, Defined as the Time From Randomization to the First Documented Disease Progression (PD), or Death From Any Cause, Whichever Occurred First
Time frame: up to approximately 34 months
PD, positron emission tomography (PET): score 4 (uptake moderately > liver) or 5 (uptake markedly higher than liver and/or new lesions) for lymph node/extra lymphatic sites with increase in intensity of Baseline uptake and/or new fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-avid foci consistent with lymphoma at interim/end-of-treatment assessment; new/recurrent FDG-avid foci in bone marrow; new FDG-avid foci consistent with lymphoma versus other etiology in new lesions. PD, computed tomography (CT): abnormal individual node/lesion with longest diameter (LDi ) >1.5 centimeters (cm) and increase by ≥50% from the product of the perpendicular diameters (PPD) nadir and increase in LDi or shortest diameter (SDi) from nadir; new/clear progression of preexisting nontarget lesions; new/recurrent splenomegaly and bone marrow involvement; regrowth of previously resolved lesions. New node >1.5 cm in any axis. New extranodal site >1.0 cm in any axis; if <1.0 cm, presence is unequivocal and attributable to lymphoma.
FL Population: Kaplan-Meier Estimates of PFS by Investigator Assessment, Using the Lugano 2014 Criteria, Defined as the Time From Randomization to the First Documented PD, or Death From Any Cause, Whichever Occurred First
Time frame: up to 2 years
PD, PET: score 4 (uptake moderately > liver) or 5 (uptake markedly higher than liver and/or new lesions) for lymph node/extra lymphatic sites with increase in intensity of Baseline uptake and/or new FDG-avid foci consistent with lymphoma at interim/end-of-treatment assessment; new/recurrent FDG-avid foci in bone marrow; new FDG-avid foci consistent with lymphoma versus other etiology in new lesions. PD, CT: abnormal individual node/lesion with LDi >1.5 cm and increase by ≥50% from the PPD nadir and increase in LDi or SDi from nadir; new/clear progression of preexisting nontarget lesions; new/recurrent splenomegaly and bone marrow involvement; regrowth of previously resolved lesions. New node >1.5 cm in any axis. New extranodal site >1.0 cm in any axis; if <1.0 cm, presence is unequivocal and attributable to lymphoma. Kaplan-Meier estimates indicate the percent probability of a participant being alive at the indicated time after treatment start.
34 secondary outcomes
Overall Population: PFS by Investigator Assessment, Using the Lugano 2014 Criteria, Defined as the Time From Randomization to the First Documented PD, or Death From Any Cause, Whichever Occurred First
Time frame: up to approximately 34 months
Overall Population: Kaplan-Meier Estimates of PFS by Investigator Assessment, Using the Lugano 2014 Criteria, Defined as the Time From Randomization to the First Documented PD, or Death From Any Cause, Whichever Occurred First
Time frame: up to 2 years
FDG-avid FL Population: Positron Emission Tomography-Complete Response (PET-CR) Rate by Investigator Assessment, Using the Lugano 2014 Criteria
Time frame: up to approximately 34 months
FL Population: Overall Survival
Time frame: up to approximately 34 months
FL Population: Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Overall Survival
Time frame: up to 2 years
FDG-avid Overall Population: PET-CR Rate by Investigator Assessment, Using the Lugano 2014 Criteria
Time frame: up to approximately 34 months
FL Population: Minimal Residual Disease (MRD)-Negativity Rate (at Threshold of 10^-5) at End of Treatment
Time frame: up to approximately 34 months
Overall Population: MRD-negativity Rate (at Threshold of 10-5) at End of Treatment
Time frame: up to approximately 34 months
FL Population: Overall Response Rate (Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a CR/PR Per the Lugano Classification at Any Time During the Study But Before the First PD and Before/at the Start of a New Antilymphoma Treatment) by Investigator Assessment
Time frame: up to approximately 34 months
Overall Population: Overall Response Rate (Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a CR/PR Per Lugano Classification at Any Time During the Study But Before the First PD and Before/at the Start of a New Antilymphoma Treatment) by Investigator Assessment
Time frame: up to approximately 34 months
FL Population: Duration of Response (DOR; the Time From the First Tumor Response [CR or PR as Per the Lugano 2014 Classification] Until the Time of the First Documented PD or Death From Any Cause, Whichever Was Earlier) by Investigator Assessment
Time frame: up to approximately 34 months
FL Population: Kaplan-Meier Estimates of DOR (the Time From the First Tumor Response [CR or PR as Per the Lugano 2014 Classification] Until the Time of the First Documented PD or Death From Any Cause, Whichever Was Earlier) by Investigator Assessment
Time frame: up to 2 years
Overall Population: DOR (the Time From the First Tumor Response [CR or PR as Per the Lugano 2014 Classification] Until the Time of the First Documented PD or Death From Any Cause, Whichever Was Earlier) by Investigator Assessment
Time frame: up to approximately 34 months
Overall Population: Kaplan-Meier Estimates of DOR (the Time From the First Tumor Response [CR or PR as Per the Lugano 2014 Classification] Until the Time of the First Documented PD or Death From Any Cause, Whichever Was Earlier) by Investigator Assessment
Time frame: up to 2 years
Overall Population: Overall Survival
Time frame: up to approximately 34 months
Overall Population: Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Overall Survival
Time frame: up to 2 years
FL Population: PFS by IRC Review, Using the Lugano 2014 Criteria, Defined as the Time From Randomization to the First Documented PD, or Death From Any Cause, Whichever Occurred First
Time frame: up to approximately 34 months
FL Population: Kaplan-Meier Estimates of PFS by IRC Review, Using the Lugano 2014 Criteria, Defined as the Time From Randomization to the First Documented PD, or Death From Any Cause, Whichever Occurred First
Time frame: up to 2 years
Overall Population: PFS by IRC Review, Using the Lugano 2014 Criteria, Defined as the Time From Randomization to the First Documented PD, or Death From Any Cause, Whichever Occurred First
Time frame: up to approximately 34 months
Overall Population: Kaplan-Meier Estimates of PFS by IRC Review, Using the Lugano 2014 Criteria, Defined as the Time From Randomization to the First Documented PD, or Death From Any Cause, Whichever Occurred First
Time frame: up to 2 years
FL Population: Overall Response Rate (Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a CR/PR Per the Lugano Classification at Any Time During the Study But Before the First PD and Before/at the Start of a New Antilymphoma Treatment) by IRC Review
Time frame: up to approximately 34 months
Overall Population: Overall Response Rate (Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a CR/PR Per Lugano Classification at Any Time During the Study But Before the First PD and Before/at the Start of a New Antilymphoma Treatment) by IRC Review
Time frame: up to approximately 34 months
FL Population: DOR the Time From the First Tumor Response [CR or PR as Per the Lugano 2014 Classification] Until the Time of the First Documented PD or Death From Any Cause, Whichever Was Earlier) by IRC Review
Time frame: up to approximately 34 months
FL Population: Kaplan-Meier Estimates of DOR (the Time From the First Tumor Response [CR or PR as Per the Lugano 2014 Classification] Until the Time of the First Documented PD or Death From Any Cause, Whichever Was Earlier) by IRC Review
Time frame: up to 2 years
Overall Population: DOR (the Time From the First Tumor Response [CR or PR as Per the Lugano 2014 Classification] Until the Time of the First Documented PD or Death From Any Cause, Whichever Was Earlier) by IRC Review
Time frame: up to approximately 34 months
Overall Population: Kaplan-Meier Estimates of DOR (the Time From the First Tumor Response [CR or PR as Per the Lugano 2014 Classification] Until the Time of the First Documented PD or Death From Any Cause, Whichever Was Earlier) by IRC Review
Time frame: up to 2 years
FL Population: EORTC QLQ-C30 Scores at Baseline and End of Treatment
Time frame: up to approximately 34 months
Overall Population: EORTC QLQ-C30 Scores at Baseline and End of Treatment
Time frame: up to approximately 34 months
FL Population: Health State EQ-5D-5L Scores at Baseline and End of Treatment
Time frame: up to approximately 34 months
Overall Population: Health State EQ-5D-5L Scores at Baseline and End of Treatment
Time frame: up to approximately 34 months
FL Population: Number of Participants With the Indicated Scores for the Five EQ-5D-5L Domains/Questions at Baseline and End of Treatment
Time frame: up to approximately 34 months
Overall Population: Number of Participants With the Indicated Scores for the Five EQ-5D-5L Domains/Questions at Baseline and End of Treatment
Time frame: up to approximately 34 months
FL Population: Functional Assessment of Cancer Treatment-Lymphoma (FACT-Lym) Scores at Baseline and End of Treatment
Time frame: up to approximately 34 months
Overall Population: FACT-Lym Scores at Baseline and End of Treatment
Time frame: up to approximately 34 months
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 4 Sep 2026.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 41360064Sehn LH, Hubel K, Luminari S, Scholz CW, Salar A, Paneesha S, Wahlin BE, Panayiotidis P, Lee HP, Jimenez-Ubieto A, Sancho JM, Kim TM, Domingo Domenech E, Kumode T, Poh C, Thieblemont C, Deeren D, de Wit E, Arbushites M, Vassallo I, Trneny M; inMIND Study team. Tafasitamab, lenalidomide, and rituximab in relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma (inMIND): a global, phase 3, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2026 Jan 10;407(10524):133-146. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(25)01778-7. Epub 2025 Dec 5.
- A Phase 3 Study to Assess Efficacy and Safety of Tafasitamab Plus Lenalidomide and Rituximab Compared to Placebo Plus Lenalidomide and Rituximab in Patients With Relapsed/ Refractory (R/ R) Follicular Lymphoma or Marginal Zone Lymphoma.Link provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Incyte shares data with qualified external researchers after a research proposal is submitted. These requests are reviewed and approved by a review panel on the basis of scientific merit. All data provided is anonymized to respect the privacy of patients who have participated in the trial in line with applicable laws and regulations. The trial data availability is according to the criteria and process described on https://www.incyte.com/our-company/compliance-and-transparency
Related trials for Follicular Lymphoma
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Deucravacitinib for Patients With Moderate/Severe Psoriasis: A Real-Life Experience in Italy
Psoriasis
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Randomized Phase 2 Study Of Epcoritamab Vs Watch And Wait InPatients With Previously Untreated Low Tumor Burden FollicularLymphoma
Randomized, Phase 2
Recruiting
rTMS and Cognitive-behavioral Therapy for Cocaine Use Disorder
Cocaine Use, Cocaine Dependence
RecruitingPhase 1
A Study of ARC-02 in B-cell NHL
B-cell Non Hodgkin Lymphoma
RecruitingPhase 4
Optimizing Preeclampsia Postpartum With Point-of-care Ultrasound
Preeclampsia, Preeclampsia Postpartum
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
261 sites in 28 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing tafasitamab, rituximab and lenalidomide in people with Follicular Lymphoma and Marginal Zone Lymphoma, run by Incyte Corporation at 261 sites in 28 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Sep 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 261 sites in United States, Spain, Italy, Japan, South Korea and 23 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 4 Apr 2025). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
FL Population: Progression-free Survival (PFS) by Investigator Assessment, Using the Lugano 2014 Criteria, Defined as the Time From Randomization to the First Documented Disease Progression (PD), or Death From Any Cause, Whichever Occurred First (time frame: up to approximately 34 months). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04680052, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Sep 2026.