Macular DegenerationNCT04685824
Visual Telerehabilitation in AMD Patients
A study testing Biofeedback Training and Immersive Virtual-Reality in people with Macular Degeneration, run by Michael Reber at 1 site in Canada.
Trial summary
Following the degeneration of the macula and the loss of central vision, the patients naturally relocate the fixation point for high visual acuity peripherally, in an eccentric and healthy part of the retina (PRL), to compensate for visual impairments. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Any age
- Conditions the study is for
- Macular Degeneration
- What is being tested?
- Biofeedback Training and Immersive Virtual-Reality
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 16 participants
- Where
- 1 siteCanada
- Study dates
- 15 Sep 2021to 6 Oct 2023
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Any age
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Dry-AMD.
- BCVA > 20/160.
- Ability to follow the visual and auditory stimuli and training instructions.
- Auditory test positive at 50Hz 25-60dBHL.
- Home Wi-Fi access.
Who cannot join
- Wet AMD.
- Both eyes with media opacity that impairs microperimetry testing.
- Inability to perform during testing and training.
- Psychoactive drugs consumption.
- 3 consecutive VRISE scores < 25 at inclusion.
- History of vertigo or dizziness
- Prior vision rehabilitation interventions.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Canada1 site
Krembil Research Institute/Toronto Western Hospital
Toronto, Ontario, M5T 0S8
About this study
Official title: Visual Rehabilitation in Macular Degeneration: a Pilot Study on Biofeedback Training and Home-based Mobile Virtual-reality Stimulation
Following the degeneration of the macula and the loss of central vision, the patients naturally relocate the fixation point for high visual acuity peripherally, in an eccentric and healthy part of the retina (PRL), to compensate for visual impairments. However, in many cases, the PRL lands on a sub-optimal retinal area and becomes useless. Modern low-vision rehabilitation procedures for AMD patients include biofeedback training (BFT) to relocate the PRL to a healthy retinal patch and acquire better fixation skills. This study seeks to combine BFT with home-based immersive virtual-reality audiovisual stimulation and measure feasibility and potential effectiveness on oculomotor control and visual perception.
- Conditions
- Macular Degeneration
- Being tested
- Biofeedback Training, Immersive Virtual-Reality
- Keywords
- Visual rehabilitation, Oculus Go, Virtual-reality, Biofeedback
- Medical subject headings
- Macular Degeneration
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Biofeedback TrainingDevice
Audiovisual stimulation
Immersive Virtual-RealityDevice
Audiovisual stimulation
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Biofeedback Training | Active comparator | * Biofeedback training (BFT): 1 sessions of 4 x 20 minutes blocks. Rest time of 5 minutes between blocks. 1 session per week for 4 weeks (4 sessions total).
* 30 min daily reading at home for 4 weeks. Receives: Device: Biofeedback Training |
| Biofeedback Training + Immersive VR | Experimental | * Biofeedback training (BFT) [1 sessions of 4 x 20 minutes blocks. Rest time of 5 minutes between blocks], 1 session per week for 4 weeks (4 sessions total).
* 30 min daily reading at home for 4 weeks
* Immersive virtual-reality stimulation (IVR) [1 session of 3 blocks of 15 trials of 20 seconds each. Rest time is 1-2 minute(s) between blocks], 1 session every 2 days for 4 weeks (14 sessions total). Receives: Device: Biofeedback Training; Device: Immersive Virtual-Reality |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Feasibility of home-based IVR audiovisual stimulation
Feasibility objectives for our pilot study to be considered successful:
- Number of patients completing the stimulation protocol: ≥ 13 out of 16 patients (81%) per group.
- Number of IVR sessions performed by the patients to consider the stimulation protocol complete: ≥ 13 sessions out of 16 (81%).
- Number of consecutive virtual-reality induced symptoms and effects (VRISE) scores < 25: ≤ 3 per patient during the treatment period.
- Number of patient drop-outs due to cybersickness (discomfort symptoms experienced in VR): ≤ 3 (19%) during the treatment period.
- Number of randomized patients per week: ≥ 3 patients.
Measured: 18 months
Secondary outcomes (6)
Visual Acuity
Change from baseline at 4 weeks, 1 month and 6 months:
- Best Corrected Visual Acuity, distance and near vision (range 20/12.5 to <20/1000, higher score = better outcome)
Measured: from baseline to end of follow-up at 7 months
Retinal Sensitivity
Change from baseline at 4 weeks,1 month and 6 months:
- Mean retinal sensitivity (Macular Integrity Assessment, MAIA microperimetry - score: 0 dB to 36 dB, higher score = better outcome)
Measured: from baseline to end of follow-up at 7 months
Fixation stability
Change from baseline at 4 weeks,1 month and 6 months:
- Mean fixation stability (Macular Integrity Assessment, MAIA microperimetry - range 0.02 sq.deg. to 40.0 sq.deg., lowest score = better outcome)
Measured: from baseline to end of follow-up at 7 months
Contrast Sensitivity
Change from baseline at 4 weeks, 1 month and 6 months:
- Mean contrast sensitivity (Functional Acuity Contrast Test, FACT - range 0.48 cyc./deg. to 2.41 cyc./deg., higher score = better outcome)
Measured: from baseline to end of follow-up at 7 months
Reading Speed
Change from baseline at 4 weeks,1 month and 6 months:
- Mean reading speed (Minnesota Low Vision Reading test, MNREAD - range 0 word/minute to 280 word/minute, higher score = better outcome)
Measured: from baseline to end of follow-up at 7 months
Quality of Life Scores
Change from baseline at 4 weeks,1 month and 6 months:
- Quality of life scores (Veteran's Affairs Low Vision Questionnaire, VA-LVQ 48 - range -31.5 to +26.6, higher score = better outcome)
Measured: from baseline to end of follow-up at 7 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted28 Dec 2020
- Study start15 Sep 2021
- Primary completion6 Oct 2023
- Study completion6 Oct 2023
Why it stopped: Recruitment rate not reached.
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Macular DegenerationStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Care provider, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 16 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Michael Reber
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, Michael Reber, University Health Network, Toronto
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04685824
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2020410013068
- Status last verified
- Nov 2023
- First submitted
- 15 Dec 2020
- Last updated
- 30 Nov 2023
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 30 Nov 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Visual Rehabilitation in Macular Degeneration: a Pilot Study on Biofeedback Training and Home-based Mobile Virtual-reality Stimulation
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04685824
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 2020410013068
- Conditions
- Macular Degeneration
- Keywords
- Visual rehabilitation, Oculus Go, Virtual-reality, Biofeedback
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: Recruitment rate not reached.
- Enrolment
- 16 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Michael ReberUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 15 Sep 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 6 Oct 2023 (actual)
- Study completion
- 6 Oct 2023 (actual)
- First posted
- 28 Dec 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Following the degeneration of the macula and the loss of central vision, the patients naturally relocate the fixation point for high visual acuity peripherally, in an eccentric and healthy part of the retina (PRL), to compensate for visual impairments. However, in many cases, the PRL lands on a sub-optimal retinal area and becomes useless. Modern low-vision rehabilitation procedures for AMD patients include biofeedback training (BFT) to relocate the PRL to a healthy retinal patch and acquire better fixation skills. This study seeks to combine BFT with home-based immersive virtual-reality audiovisual stimulation and measure feasibility and potential effectiveness on oculomotor control and visual perception.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (care provider, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Biofeedback Training | Active comparator | Device: Biofeedback Training* Biofeedback training (BFT): 1 sessions of 4 x 20 minutes blocks. Rest time of 5 minutes between blocks. 1 session per week for 4 weeks (4 sessions total). * 30 min daily reading at home for 4 weeks. |
| Biofeedback Training + Immersive VR | Experimental | Device: Biofeedback Training, Device: Immersive Virtual-Reality* Biofeedback training (BFT) [1 sessions of 4 x 20 minutes blocks. Rest time of 5 minutes between blocks], 1 session per week for 4 weeks (4 sessions total). * 30 min daily reading at home for 4 weeks * Immersive virtual-reality stimulation (IVR) [1 session of 3 blocks of 15 trials of 20 seconds each. Rest time is 1-2 minute(s) between blocks], 1 session every 2 days for 4 weeks (14 sessions total). |
Who may qualify
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Dry-AMD.
- BCVA > 20/160.
- Ability to follow the visual and auditory stimuli and training instructions.
- Auditory test positive at 50Hz 25-60dBHL.
- Home Wi-Fi access.
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Wet AMD.
- Both eyes with media opacity that impairs microperimetry testing.
- Inability to perform during testing and training.
- Psychoactive drugs consumption.
- 3 consecutive VRISE scores < 25 at inclusion.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Biofeedback TrainingAudiovisual stimulation | Device | Biofeedback Training, Biofeedback Training + Immersive VR |
| Immersive Virtual-RealityAudiovisual stimulation | Device | Biofeedback Training + Immersive VR |
Primary outcome
Feasibility of home-based IVR audiovisual stimulation
Time frame: 18 months
Feasibility objectives for our pilot study to be considered successful: 1. Number of patients completing the stimulation protocol: ≥ 13 out of 16 patients (81%) per group. 2. Number of IVR sessions performed by the patients to consider the stimulation protocol complete: ≥ 13 sessions out of 16 (81%). 3. Number of consecutive virtual-reality induced symptoms and effects (VRISE) scores < 25: ≤ 3 per patient during the treatment period. 4. Number of patient drop-outs due to cybersickness (discomfort symptoms experienced in VR): ≤ 3 (19%) during the treatment period. 5. Number of randomized patients per week: ≥ 3 patients.
6 secondary outcomes
Visual Acuity
Time frame: from baseline to end of follow-up at 7 months
Retinal Sensitivity
Time frame: from baseline to end of follow-up at 7 months
Fixation stability
Time frame: from baseline to end of follow-up at 7 months
Contrast Sensitivity
Time frame: from baseline to end of follow-up at 7 months
Reading Speed
Time frame: from baseline to end of follow-up at 7 months
Quality of Life Scores
Time frame: from baseline to end of follow-up at 7 months
Results and safety
The study was stopped early (reason given: Recruitment rate not reached.). Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 30 Nov 2023.
Related trials for Macular Degeneration
RecruitingPhase 2
An Open-Label Phase 2 Study of N-Acetyl-D-Mannosamine (ManNAc) in Subjects With Podocyte Diseases
Focal Segmental Glomerulosclerosis, Minimal Change Disease
Active, not recruitingPhase 4
A Study About the Safety of ASP3021 Eye Injections and if They Help People in Japan With Vision Loss From Age-related Macular Degeneration
Geographic Atrophy, Age-Related Macular Degeneration
RecruitingObservational study
Age-Related Macular Degeneration Benchmark Imaging Dataset (ABID)
Age-Related Macular Degeneration
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of OCU410 for Geographic Atrophy
Geographic Atrophy
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Autologous Transplantation of Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell-Derived Retinal Pigment Epithelium for Geographic Atrophy Associated With Age-Related Macular Degeneration
Dry Age-Related Macular Degeneration, Geographic Atrophy
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Biofeedback Training and Immersive Virtual-Reality in people with Macular Degeneration, run by Michael Reber at 1 site in Canada.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 Nov 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study was stopped early (reason given: Recruitment rate not reached.). Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Feasibility of home-based IVR audiovisual stimulation (time frame: 18 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 Nov 2023.