Leukemia, Myeloid, AcutePhase 2NCT04687098
Risk-adapted Therapy for Primary Acute Myeloid Leukemia
A Phase 2 study testing Idarubicin, Ara-C and G-CSF in people with Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute, run by Grupo Cooperativo de Estudio y Tratamiento de las Leucemias Agudas y Mielodisplasias at 15 sites in Spain.
Trial summary
The AML-12 study investigates the efficacy and toxicity of standard induction chemotherapy with idarubicin and cytarabine (IC) with G-CSF priming followed by a risk-adapted post remission therapy for patients up to the age of 70 diagnosed with de novo acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 17 to 70 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute
- What is being tested?
- Idarubicin, Ara-C and G-CSF
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion, Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 1,034 participants
- Where
- 15 sitesSpain
- Study dates
- 1 Feb 2012to 10 Nov 2022
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 17 to 70 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients with newly diagnosed AML, classified using the World Health Organization (WHO) 2017 criteria.
- Patients with 70 years old or younger.
Who cannot join
- Patients previously treated for the AML with chemotherapy different from hydroxyurea.
- Acute promyelocytic leukemia with t(15;17).
- Chronic myeloid leukemia in blastic phase.
- Secondary AML or therapy related AML.
- Presence of concomitant active neoplastic disease.
- Abnormal renal and hepatic functions with creatinin and/or bilirubin 2 times higher than the normal threshold, except when the alteration should be attributed to the leukemia.
Show all 9Show fewer
- Patients with a cardiac ejection fraction below 45%, symptomatic cardiac deficiency or both.
- Patients with neurological or concomitant psychiatric disease.
- HIV infection.
Trial locations and contacts
15 sites in 1 country.
15 sites in 1 country
Spain15 sites
ICO Badalona-Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol
Badalona, Barcelona, 08916
Hospital del Mar
Barcelona, 08003
Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau
Barcelona, 08025
Hospital Vall d'Hebron
Barcelona, 08035
Hospital Clinic Barcelona
Barcelona, 08036
ICO-Girona Hopital Universitari de Girona Dr. Josep Trueta
Girona, 17007
ICO Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge
L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, 08907
Hospital Universitari Arnau de Vilanova
Lleida, 25006
Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Victoria
Málaga, 29010
Hospital Universitari Son Espases
Palma de Mallorca, Mallorca, 07198
Hospital Universitari Son Llatzer
Palma de Mallorca, Mallorca
ICO Tarragona-Hospital Universitari Joan XXIII
Tarragona, 43007
Mutua de Terrassa
Terrassa, 08225
Hospital Verge de la Cinta
Tortosa, Tarragona, 43517
Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia
Valencia, 496010
About this study
Official title: Risk-adapted Therapy for Primary Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) in Adult Patients up to 70 Years Old
The AML-12 study investigates the efficacy and toxicity of standard induction chemotherapy with idarubicin and cytarabine (IC) with G-CSF priming followed by a risk-adapted post remission therapy for patients up to the age of 70 diagnosed with de novo acute myeloid leukemia (AML).
Modifications from the previous protocol AML-03 (NCT01723657) include removal of etoposide in induction, limitation of the GCSF priming to the induction phase and categorization of post remission therapy (stem cell transplant or 2 high dose cytarabine consolidations) according to diagnostic genetics as well as post-remission clearance of measurable residual disease.
The aims of these modifications are to improve the overall survival and leukemia free survival of acute myeloid leukemia patients with a risk-adapted approach.
Read the detailed description
Induction chemotherapy: Idarubicin (12mg/m2/day intravenous, days 1-3), Low-dose cytarabine (200mg/m2/day, intravenous in continuous infusion, days 1-7) and G-CSF priming 150mcg/m2/day, subcutaneous from day 0 to the last day of chemotherapy if white blood cell count (WBC) <30x10E9/L.
This induction chemotherapy can be repeated twice in the case of partial response (PR) to achieve complete response (CR).
Once CR is achieved (with one or two induction cycles), all patients receive a consolidation course with high-dose cytarabine (3000mg/m2/12h days 1, 3 and 5) and pegfilgrastim 6mg on day 6.
After this, patients will be allocated to the different risk groups as follows:
- Favorable risk group [patients with t(8;21)(q22;q22)/RUNX1/RUNX1T1, inv(16)(p12;q22) or t(16;16)/CBFB/MYH11; Intermediate risk cytogenetics (MRC 2010) and NPM1 mutation with FLT3 wild type or low ratio of FLT3 internal tandem duplication (ITD)/wild type (<0.5); or CEBPA biallelic mutation]. Patients in this group will receive 2 additional courses of consolidation therapy
- Intermediate risk group [Intermediate risk cytogenetics (MRC 2010) without NPM1 mutations, FLT3-ITD, or CEBPA biallelic mutation]. Patients in this group receive an allogeneic stem cell transplant in first CR. Patients without an available donor can be autografted per center decision
- Adverse risk group [Adverse risk cytogenetics (MRC 2010), intermediate cytogenetics with FLT3-ITD without NPM1 mutation or NPM1-FLT3-ITD high ratio or MLL rearrangement; any favorable or intermediate risk patients with positive MRD following 1 (intermediate) or 2 (favorable) consolidation courses]. Intention to treat of those patients is allogeneic stem cell transplant from any source.
- Conditions
- Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute
- Being tested
- Idarubicin, Ara-C, G-CSF, Allogeneic matched or unrelated donor transplant., Autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplant
- Keywords
- Leukemia, Myeloid
- Medical subject headings
- Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute, Leukemia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
IdarubicinDrug
Also called Ida
12 mg/m2/day; intravenous, administration at induction phase, days 1 to 3.
Ara-CDrug
Also called HDAC
200mg/m2/day, intravenous at induction phase; days 1-7.
- High dose during consolidation phase. In patients up to 60 years 3g/m2/12hours days 1,3,5, and patients 60 to 70 years: 1.5g/m2/12hours days 1,3,5.
G-CSFDrug
Also called Pegfilgrastim
- Administration at induction phase to remission days 1 to 7. G-CSF will not be initiated if the leukocyte count is over 30x10e9/L at diagnosis or will be interrupted if the leukocyte count during treatment arises 30x10e9/L.
- Administration at consolidation phase day 7.
Allogeneic matched or unrelated donor transplant.Procedure or surgery
To be performed in patients in the intermediate or adverse risk groups.
Autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantProcedure or surgery
To be considered in patients in the intermediate risk group without an available allogeneic donor and negative measurable residual disease, per center decision.
Measurable residual diseaseProcedure or surgery
Also called MRD
To be performed either with molecular monitoring or, if not applicable, by flow cytometry. Pre-stablished cut-off values are defined for decision-making.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Risk-adapted postremission treatment. | Other | Induction (idarubicin, cytarabine), first consolidation (high dose cytarabine), risk- stratification: allogeneic matched related or unrelated donor transplant vs. consolidation courses. Receives: Drug: Idarubicin; Drug: Ara-C; Drug: G-CSF; Procedure: Allogeneic matched or unrelated donor transplant.; Procedure: Autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplant; Procedure: Measurable residual disease |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Complete remission rate (CRR)
Analyze the efficacy and toxicity of the current doses of IC (Idarubicin and cytarabine) with G-CSF priming to achieve complete remission in patients tih AML up to 70yo.
Measured: 2 months
Disease free survival (DFS)
Analyze the disease free survival in the whole cohort of AML patients.
Measured: 4 years
Relapse rate (RR)
Analyze the relapse rate of all patients achieving remission with intensive induction followed by risk-adapted consolidation strategies.
Measured: 4 years
Secondary outcomes (4)
Feasibility of treatment completion
Increase the number of patients who complete all treatment phases
Measured: 4 years
Survival outcome analysis of the 3 risk-adapted categories (favourable, intermediate and adverse)
Evaluate the feasibility of the consolidation treatments in the different risk groups by comparison of overall survival (OS), RR and DFS.
Measured: 4 years
Feasibility of centralized monitoring of measurable residual disease (MRD)
Survival outcomes in positive vs negative MRD patients. Number of patients with modified risk due to positive MRD.
Measured: 4 years
Comparison of global outcomes with previous protocol (AML-03) and other published protocols.
Comparison of CRR, OS, RR and DFS
Measured: 4 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted29 Dec 2020
- Study start1 Feb 2012
- Primary completion31 Jul 2022
- Study completion10 Nov 2022
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Leukemia, Myeloid, AcuteStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 1,034 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Grupo Cooperativo de Estudio y Tratamiento de las Leucemias Agudas y Mielodisplasias
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Jorge Sierra, Prof, MD, Principal investigator, Fundació Institut de Recerca de l'Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant PauJordi Esteve, MD, PhD, Principal investigator, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04687098
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- AML-12
- Status last verified
- Jun 2023
- First submitted
- 18 Dec 2020
- Last updated
- 27 Jun 2023
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Onate G, Pratcorona M, Garrido A, Artigas-Baleri A, Bataller A, Tormo M, Arnan M, Vives S, Coll R, Salamero O, Vall-Llovera F, Sampol A, Garcia A, Cervera M, Avila SG, Bargay J, Ortin X, Nomdedeu JF, Esteve J, Sierra J; Spanish Cooperative Group for the Study and Treatment of Acute Leukemias and Myelodysplasias (CETLAM). Survival improvement of patients with FLT3 mutated acute myeloid leukemia: results from a prospective 9 years cohort. Blood Cancer J. 2023 May 5;13(1):69. doi: 10.1038/s41408-023-00839-1.
PubMed 37147301
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 27 Jun 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Risk-adapted Therapy for Primary Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) in Adult Patients up to 70 Years Old
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04687098
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- AML-12
- Conditions
- Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute
- Keywords
- Leukemia, Myeloid
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 1,034 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Grupo Cooperativo de Estudio y Tratamiento de las Leucemias Agudas y MielodisplasiasUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Feb 2012 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Jul 2022 (actual)
- Study completion
- 10 Nov 2022 (actual)
- First posted
- 29 Dec 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The AML-12 study investigates the efficacy and toxicity of standard induction chemotherapy with idarubicin and cytarabine (IC) with G-CSF priming followed by a risk-adapted post remission therapy for patients up to the age of 70 diagnosed with de novo acute myeloid leukemia (AML).
Modifications from the previous protocol AML-03 (NCT01723657) include removal of etoposide in induction, limitation of the GCSF priming to the induction phase and categorization of post remission therapy (stem cell transplant or 2 high dose cytarabine consolidations) according to diagnostic genetics as well as post-remission clearance of measurable residual disease.
The aims of these modifications are to improve the overall survival and leukemia free survival of acute myeloid leukemia patients with a risk-adapted approach.
Detailed description
Induction chemotherapy: Idarubicin (12mg/m2/day intravenous, days 1-3), Low-dose cytarabine (200mg/m2/day, intravenous in continuous infusion, days 1-7) and G-CSF priming 150mcg/m2/day, subcutaneous from day 0 to the last day of chemotherapy if white blood cell count (WBC) <30x10E9/L.
This induction chemotherapy can be repeated twice in the case of partial response (PR) to achieve complete response (CR).
Once CR is achieved (with one or two induction cycles), all patients receive a consolidation course with high-dose cytarabine (3000mg/m2/12h days 1, 3 and 5) and pegfilgrastim 6mg on day 6.
After this, patients will be allocated to the different risk groups as follows:
- Favorable risk group [patients with t(8;21)(q22;q22)/RUNX1/RUNX1T1, inv(16)(p12;q22) or t(16;16)/CBFB/MYH11; Intermediate risk cytogenetics (MRC 2010) and NPM1 mutation with FLT3 wild type or low ratio of FLT3 internal tandem duplication (ITD)/wild type (<0.5); or CEBPA biallelic mutation]. Patients in this group will receive 2 additional courses of consolidation therapy
- Intermediate risk group [Intermediate risk cytogenetics (MRC 2010) without NPM1 mutations, FLT3-ITD, or CEBPA biallelic mutation]. Patients in this group receive an allogeneic stem cell transplant in first CR. Patients without an available donor can be autografted per center decision
- Adverse risk group [Adverse risk cytogenetics (MRC 2010), intermediate cytogenetics with FLT3-ITD without NPM1 mutation or NPM1-FLT3-ITD high ratio or MLL rearrangement; any favorable or intermediate risk patients with positive MRD following 1 (intermediate) or 2 (favorable) consolidation courses]. Intention to treat of those patients is allogeneic stem cell transplant from any source.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Risk-adapted postremission treatment. | Other | Drug: Idarubicin, Drug: Ara-C, Drug: G-CSF, Procedure: Allogeneic matched or unrelated donor transplant., Procedure: Autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplant, Procedure: Measurable residual diseaseInduction (idarubicin, cytarabine), first consolidation (high dose cytarabine), risk- stratification: allogeneic matched related or unrelated donor transplant vs. consolidation courses. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 17 to 70 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Patients with newly diagnosed AML, classified using the World Health Organization (WHO) 2017 criteria.
- Patients with 70 years old or younger.
Key exclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Patients previously treated for the AML with chemotherapy different from hydroxyurea.
- Acute promyelocytic leukemia with t(15;17).
- Chronic myeloid leukemia in blastic phase.
- Secondary AML or therapy related AML.
- Presence of concomitant active neoplastic disease.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| IdarubicinAlso: Ida12 mg/m2/day; intravenous, administration at induction phase, days 1 to 3. | Drug | Risk-adapted postremission treatment. |
| Ara-CAlso: HDAC200mg/m2/day, intravenous at induction phase; days 1-7. - High dose during consolidation phase. In patients up to 60 years 3g/m2/12hours days 1,3,5, and patients 60 to 70 years: 1.5g/m2/12hours days 1,3,5. | Drug | Risk-adapted postremission treatment. |
| G-CSFAlso: Pegfilgrastim* Administration at induction phase to remission days 1 to 7. G-CSF will not be initiated if the leukocyte count is over 30x10e9/L at diagnosis or will be interrupted if the leukocyte count during treatment arises 30x10e9/L. * Administration at consolidation phase day 7. | Drug | Risk-adapted postremission treatment. |
| Allogeneic matched or unrelated donor transplant.To be performed in patients in the intermediate or adverse risk groups. | Procedure or surgery | Risk-adapted postremission treatment. |
| Autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantTo be considered in patients in the intermediate risk group without an available allogeneic donor and negative measurable residual disease, per center decision. | Procedure or surgery | Risk-adapted postremission treatment. |
| Measurable residual diseaseAlso: MRDTo be performed either with molecular monitoring or, if not applicable, by flow cytometry. Pre-stablished cut-off values are defined for decision-making. | Procedure or surgery | Risk-adapted postremission treatment. |
Primary outcome
Complete remission rate (CRR)
Time frame: 2 months
Analyze the efficacy and toxicity of the current doses of IC (Idarubicin and cytarabine) with G-CSF priming to achieve complete remission in patients tih AML up to 70yo.
Disease free survival (DFS)
Time frame: 4 years
Analyze the disease free survival in the whole cohort of AML patients.
Relapse rate (RR)
Time frame: 4 years
Analyze the relapse rate of all patients achieving remission with intensive induction followed by risk-adapted consolidation strategies.
4 secondary outcomes
Feasibility of treatment completion
Time frame: 4 years
Survival outcome analysis of the 3 risk-adapted categories (favourable, intermediate and adverse)
Time frame: 4 years
Feasibility of centralized monitoring of measurable residual disease (MRD)
Time frame: 4 years
Comparison of global outcomes with previous protocol (AML-03) and other published protocols.
Time frame: 4 years
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 27 Jun 2023.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 37147301Onate G, Pratcorona M, Garrido A, Artigas-Baleri A, Bataller A, Tormo M, Arnan M, Vives S, Coll R, Salamero O, Vall-Llovera F, Sampol A, Garcia A, Cervera M, Avila SG, Bargay J, Ortin X, Nomdedeu JF, Esteve J, Sierra J; Spanish Cooperative Group for the Study and Treatment of Acute Leukemias and Myelodysplasias (CETLAM). Survival improvement of patients with FLT3 mutated acute myeloid leukemia: results from a prospective 9 years cohort. Blood Cancer J. 2023 May 5;13(1):69. doi: 10.1038/s41408-023-00839-1.
Related trials for Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Revumenib, Azacitidine, and VENetoclax in Newly Diagnosed KMT2A-Rearranged AML
Leukemia Acute Myeloid
RecruitingPhase 4
Oral Azacitidine in Transplant-Eligible Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) Suffering From Health-Inequality
Acute Myeloid Leukemia
RecruitingPhase 1/2
The Lowest Effective Dose of Post-Transplantation Cyclophosphamide in Combination With Sirolimus and Mycophenolate Mofetil as Graft-Versus-Host Disease Prophylaxis After Reduced Intensity Conditioning and Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation
Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation, Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Risk Stratification Value of Deep NGS-MRD Detection in Acute Myeloid Leukemia Patients After Allo-HSCT
Measurable Residual Disease, Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Enrolling by invitationPhase 1
A Rollover Study for Continued Study Treatment and Ongoing Safety Monitoring
Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute, Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Jorge Sierra, Prof, MD principal investigator
Fundació Institut de Recerca de l'Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau
Jordi Esteve, MD, PhD principal investigator
Hospital Clinic of Barcelona
15 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Idarubicin, Ara-C and G-CSF in people with Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute, run by Grupo Cooperativo de Estudio y Tratamiento de las Leucemias Agudas y Mielodisplasias at 15 sites in Spain.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Jun 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 15 sites in Spain. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Complete remission rate (CRR) (time frame: 2 months). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04687098, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Jun 2023.