Volume Outcome Relationship Among COVID-19 Inpatients in US HospitalsNCT04688372
Hospital COVID-19 Surge and Associated Mortality Risk
An observational study of Volume Outcome Relationship Among COVID-19 Inpatients in US Hospitals, run by National Institutes of Health Clinical Center (CC) at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
A retrospective cohort study will be conducted using a large administrative database of U.S. hospitals to understand the volume-outcome relationship among patients hospitalized with COVID-19. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Volume Outcome Relationship Among COVID-19 Inpatients in US Hospitals
- What is being tested?
- Surge Index
- How many people
- 144,116 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 1 Oct 2020to 15 Feb 2021
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: See study description
Who may be able to join
- See study description
Who cannot join
- See study description
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
National Institutes of Health Clinical Center (primary center conducting large database study)
Bethesda, Maryland, 20892
About this study
Official title: Association Between Hospital Case Burden and Mortality Risk Among Patients Hospitalized With COVID-19: A Retrospective Cohort Study of U.S. Hospitals
A retrospective cohort study will be conducted using a large administrative database of U.S. hospitals to understand the volume-outcome relationship among patients hospitalized with COVID-19.
Read the detailed description
Patients with critical illness and/or respiratory failure tend to display better outcomes at hospitals that manage higher volumes of these patients. However, during a COVID-19 pandemic, this relationship may have been altered by the strain of higher patient volume on resources and personnel. A retrospective cohort study will be conducted using a large administrative database to understand the volume-outcome relationship among patients hospitalized with COVID-19. Understanding the COVID-19 volume-outcome relationship in U.S. hospitals may help identify the optimal care setting and transfer thresholds, and inform triage policies and risk-adjustment.
The Premier Healthcare Database (PHD), an all-payer administrative data repository covering approximately 20% of U.S. hospitalizations from 48 states will be queried for adult (18+ years) in-patient encounters that recorded diagnosis coding for COVID-19 March 1st through August 31st, 2020 at continuously-reporting hospitals. Hospitals with <15 COVID-19 encounters over the study period will be excluded from the primary cohort to preserve statistical reliability.
A surge index will be calculated for each hospital month that incorporates care-complexity-weighted COVID-19 case burden and will be normalized for nominal (2019) bed capacity and non-COVID-19 case burden and will represent the primary covariate. Hospital months will be stratified by the percentile of the surge index (e.g. <50th, 50-75th, 75-90th, 90-95th and ≥95th percentile).
The impact of COVID-19-case burden (surge index) on the risk-adjusted odds ratio (aOR) of mortality (or discharge to hospice) among overall COVID-19 cohorts will be determined using a hierarchical generalized linear mixed model controlling for case-mix, treatment-related, time-varying and other hospital-level factors. Variables will be selected based on their representing "baseline" status upon presentation to the hospital to minimize effect of mediators.
Variables for case mix adjustment: age, gender, race/ethnicity, comorbidity burden, insurance status, admission source and acuity, acute organ failure score and code status present-on-admission, use of pharmacologic agents (remdesivir, corticosteroids, hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin), severity of hypoxia (acute respiratory failure codes, need for non invasive positive pressure ventilation, need for invasive mechanical ventilation), vasopressor use within two days of admission respectively.
Variables for temporal and hospital-level adjustment: hospital teaching status, urbanity, geographic region, bed capacity, hospital proportion of Medicaid/uninsured admissions, proportion of COVID-19 patients intubated within 2 days of admission, hospital's technologic index (stratified by availability of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, more than one ICU and continuous renal replacement therapy), hospital availability of remdesivir, attending physician to patient ratio, pre-COVID-19 mechanical ventilation volume, proportion of overall admits tested for COVID-19 and admission month (1st vs 2nd wave).
Effect modification by (1st vs. 2nd ) pandemic wave, the previous month's surge index and rate of acute hospital transfers and/or tracheotomies will assessed using interaction terms. Sensitivity analyses will be performed using alternative iterations/strata of the surge index, excluding fewer patients for statistical reliability, models with and without treatment-related variables and using Elixhauser comorbidity index instead of US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention-defined poor prognostic underlying conditions in COVID-19 to test robustness of results. Analyses will be repeated using in-hospital mortality (without reported discharges to hospice). The magnitude of an unmeasured confounder that would be necessary to alter the direction of statistically significant findings will be assessed. More selective subgroups of patients in ICU and mechanical ventilation will not be used as a primary study population given the potentially dynamic nature of admission and intubation criteria over the course of the pandemic and its relationship to volume.
Depending on availability at the time of analysis, an de-identified curated electronic health record-based dataset will be used for clinical validation of select variables in administrative data (e.g. reliability of respiratory failure codes in representing patients requiring high-flow oxygen alone i.e. not non-invasive or invasive mechanical ventilation.)
- Being tested
- Surge Index
- Keywords
- surge, volume, mortality, COVID-19, coronavirus, hospital
- Medical subject headings
- COVID-19, Coronavirus Infections
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Surge IndexOther
See study description above
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Inpatient encounters with COVID-19 present-on-admission | See Study description above Receives: Other: Surge Index |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
In-hospital mortality or discharge to hospice
Measured: From time of admission to death during the hospitalization or discharge to hospice
Secondary outcomes (1)
In-hospital mortality
(without reported discharges to hospice)
Measured: From time of admission to death during the hospitalization
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted30 Dec 2020
- Study start1 Oct 2020
- Primary completion15 Feb 2021
- Study completion15 Feb 2021
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Volume Outcome Relationship Among COVID-19 Inpatients in US HospitalsStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
- Enrolment
- 144,116 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- National Institutes of Health Clinical Center (CC)
- Sponsor type
- US National Institutes of Health
- Collaborators
- Emory University, Harvard Medical School (HMS and HSDM), National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), National Cancer Institute (NCI)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Sameer S Kadri, MD, MS, Principal investigator, National Institutes of Health, Clinical
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04688372
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- BD022386
- Status last verified
- Dec 2020
- First submitted
- 28 Dec 2020
- Last updated
- 6 Apr 2021
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Kadri SS, Sun J, Lawandi A, Strich JR, Busch LM, Keller M, Babiker A, Yek C, Malik S, Krack J, Dekker JP, Spaulding AB, Ricotta E, Powers JH 3rd, Rhee C, Klompas M, Athale J, Boehmer TK, Gundlapalli AV, Bentley W, Datta SD, Danner RL, Demirkale CY, Warner S. Association Between Caseload Surge and COVID-19 Survival in 558 U.S. Hospitals, March to August 2020. Ann Intern Med. 2021 Sep;174(9):1240-1251. doi: 10.7326/M21-1213. Epub 2021 Jul 6.
PubMed 34224257
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 6 Apr 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Association Between Hospital Case Burden and Mortality Risk Among Patients Hospitalized With COVID-19: A Retrospective Cohort Study of U.S. Hospitals
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04688372
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- BD022386
- Keywords
- surge, volume, mortality, COVID-19, coronavirus, hospital
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 144,116 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- National Institutes of Health Clinical Center (CC)US National Institutes of Health
- Collaborators
- Emory University, Harvard Medical School (HMS and HSDM), National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), National Cancer Institute (NCI)
- Study start
- 1 Oct 2020 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 15 Feb 2021 (actual)
- Study completion
- 15 Feb 2021 (actual)
- First posted
- 30 Dec 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
A retrospective cohort study will be conducted using a large administrative database of U.S. hospitals to understand the volume-outcome relationship among patients hospitalized with COVID-19.
Detailed description
Patients with critical illness and/or respiratory failure tend to display better outcomes at hospitals that manage higher volumes of these patients. However, during a COVID-19 pandemic, this relationship may have been altered by the strain of higher patient volume on resources and personnel. A retrospective cohort study will be conducted using a large administrative database to understand the volume-outcome relationship among patients hospitalized with COVID-19. Understanding the COVID-19 volume-outcome relationship in U.S. hospitals may help identify the optimal care setting and transfer thresholds, and inform triage policies and risk-adjustment.
The Premier Healthcare Database (PHD), an all-payer administrative data repository covering approximately 20% of U.S. hospitalizations from 48 states will be queried for adult (18+ years) in-patient encounters that recorded diagnosis coding for COVID-19 March 1st through August 31st, 2020 at continuously-reporting hospitals. Hospitals with <15 COVID-19 encounters over the study period will be excluded from the primary cohort to preserve statistical reliability.
A surge index will be calculated for each hospital month that incorporates care-complexity-weighted COVID-19 case burden and will be normalized for nominal (2019) bed capacity and non-COVID-19 case burden and will represent the primary covariate. Hospital months will be stratified by the percentile of the surge index (e.g. <50th, 50-75th, 75-90th, 90-95th and ≥95th percentile).
The impact of COVID-19-case burden (surge index) on the risk-adjusted odds ratio (aOR) of mortality (or discharge to hospice) among overall COVID-19 cohorts will be determined using a hierarchical generalized linear mixed model controlling for case-mix, treatment-related, time-varying and other hospital-level factors. Variables will be selected based on their representing "baseline" status upon presentation to the hospital to minimize effect of mediators.
Variables for case mix adjustment: age, gender, race/ethnicity, comorbidity burden, insurance status, admission source and acuity, acute organ failure score and code status present-on-admission, use of pharmacologic agents (remdesivir, corticosteroids, hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin), severity of hypoxia (acute respiratory failure codes, need for non invasive positive pressure ventilation, need for invasive mechanical ventilation), vasopressor use within two days of admission respectively.
Variables for temporal and hospital-level adjustment: hospital teaching status, urbanity, geographic region, bed capacity, hospital proportion of Medicaid/uninsured admissions, proportion of COVID-19 patients intubated within 2 days of admission, hospital's technologic index (stratified by availability of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, more than one ICU and continuous renal replacement therapy), hospital availability of remdesivir, attending physician to patient ratio, pre-COVID-19 mechanical ventilation volume, proportion of overall admits tested for COVID-19 and admission month (1st vs 2nd wave).
Effect modification by (1st vs. 2nd ) pandemic wave, the previous month's surge index and rate of acute hospital transfers and/or tracheotomies will assessed using interaction terms. Sensitivity analyses will be performed using alternative iterations/strata of the surge index, excluding fewer patients for statistical reliability, models with and without treatment-related variables and using Elixhauser comorbidity index instead of US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention-defined poor prognostic underlying conditions in COVID-19 to test robustness of results. Analyses will be repeated using in-hospital mortality (without reported discharges to hospice). The magnitude of an unmeasured confounder that would be necessary to alter the direction of statistically significant findings will be assessed. More selective subgroups of patients in ICU and mechanical ventilation will not be used as a primary study population given the potentially dynamic nature of admission and intubation criteria over the course of the pandemic and its relationship to volume.
Depending on availability at the time of analysis, an de-identified curated electronic health record-based dataset will be used for clinical validation of select variables in administrative data (e.g. reliability of respiratory failure codes in representing patients requiring high-flow oxygen alone i.e. not non-invasive or invasive mechanical ventilation.)
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Inpatient encounters with COVID-19 present-on-admission | – | Other: Surge IndexSee Study description above |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- See study description
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- See study description
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- See study description
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Surge IndexSee study description above | Other | Inpatient encounters with COVID-19 present-on-admission |
Primary outcome
In-hospital mortality or discharge to hospice
Time frame: From time of admission to death during the hospitalization or discharge to hospice
1 secondary outcome
In-hospital mortality
Time frame: From time of admission to death during the hospitalization
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 6 Apr 2021.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 34224257Kadri SS, Sun J, Lawandi A, Strich JR, Busch LM, Keller M, Babiker A, Yek C, Malik S, Krack J, Dekker JP, Spaulding AB, Ricotta E, Powers JH 3rd, Rhee C, Klompas M, Athale J, Boehmer TK, Gundlapalli AV, Bentley W, Datta SD, Danner RL, Demirkale CY, Warner S. Association Between Caseload Surge and COVID-19 Survival in 558 U.S. Hospitals, March to August 2020. Ann Intern Med. 2021 Sep;174(9):1240-1251. doi: 10.7326/M21-1213. Epub 2021 Jul 6.
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Sameer S Kadri, MD, MS principal investigator
National Institutes of Health, Clinical
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Volume Outcome Relationship Among COVID-19 Inpatients in US Hospitals, run by National Institutes of Health Clinical Center (CC) at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Apr 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
In-hospital mortality or discharge to hospice (time frame: From time of admission to death during the hospitalization or discharge to hospice). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04688372, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Apr 2021.