Stroke, AcuteMWKNeuroRehaNCT04688970
Personalized Neurorehabilitative Precision Medicine - From Data to Therapies
An observational study of Stroke, Acute and Outcome, Improvement, run by University Hospital Tuebingen at 1 site in Germany.
Trial summary
Stroke is the most common neurological disease leaving one third dead and one third with permanent impairment despite best medical treatment. The aim of the present study is to investigate why patients differ in how they benefit from neurorehabilitation by collecting clinical, electrophysiological, imaging and… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Stroke, Acute, Outcome, Improvement, Rehabilitation
- How many people
- 500 participants
- Where
- 1 siteGermany
- Study dates
- 1 Dec 2020to 30 Jun 2022
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: We aim to include all patients with acute stroke affecting the UE (FMA less than 50) on our SU. Other symptoms like aphasia or neglect are no reason for exclusion since we intend to include as many patients as possible to capture the whole spectrum of stroke from mild to severe. Especially the last case, the inclusion of severely affected patients, is of utmost importance in our view. Due to their grave impairments they have the greatest need for neurorehabilitation; at the same time, this group of patients is the most vulnerable because of their preexisting comorbidities and conditions coming with immobility e. g. pneumonia. A personalized treatment would meet their need for intense rehabilitation while providing enough recreation time since unnecessary, ineffective rehabilitation could be omitted.
Who may be able to join
- Subject is 18 years or above.
- Subject has an acute stroke affecting one UE (FMA less than 50).
- Subject or understands the study and its procedures and gives informed consent.
- If the subject is not able to give informed consent:
- The assumed will of the patient is to be determined by the patient's provision (if existing), the health care proxy (if existing) and/or the moral concepts expressed by the patient to close relatives.
- The legal representative gives informed consent because participation is the assumed will of the patient as assessed by the aforementioned points.
Who cannot join
- Subject is less than 18 years old.
- The subject does not have an acute stroke, or stroke does not affect the UE, or FMA > 50.
- Subject or legal representative cannot give informed consent.
- Patient has an intracranial implant (e.g., aneurysm clips, shunts, stimulators, cochlear implants, or electrodes) or any other metal object within or near the head (excluding the mouth) that cannot be safely removed.
- Subject has a history of any illness that, in the opinion of the study investigator, might confound the results of the study or poses an additional risk to the subject by their participation in the study.
- There is any concern by the investigator regarding the safe participation of the subject in the study, or for any other reason the investigator considers the subject inappropriate for participation in the study.
- Subject is pregnant.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Germany1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
University hospital of Tuebingen
Tübingen, Baden-Wurttemberg, 72076
Corinna Blum, PhD, m. d., +4970712961788, neuroreha@med.uni-tuebingen.de
Christine Rösinger-Hein, PhD, +4970712961788, neuroreha@med.uni-tuebingen.de
About this study
Stroke is the most common neurological disease leaving one third dead and one third with permanent impairment despite best medical treatment. The aim of the present study is to investigate why patients differ in how they benefit from neurorehabilitation by collecting clinical, electrophysiological, imaging and laboratory data in the acute phase of stroke as well as later on during rehabilitation and after 90 days. Following a closed-loop approach the data is analyzed by a machine learning algorithm to create a personalized neurorehabilitation strategy.
Read the detailed description
Clinical tests: Each subject will be assessed using the following tests:
National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS): The NIHSS is part of the usual highly standardized stroke workup. It consists of 15 items which can be scored with 0 to 4 points maximum. It is used to measure stroke severity as well as impairment and to detect improvement or deterioration of the patient. A high score corresponds to a severe stroke.
FMA for UE and sensory system: The FMA for the UE and the sensory system describes the sensory-motor impairment of the arm after stroke. It consists of 66 items for the motor function of the UE and 24 items for the sensory function scored from 0 to 2. A high score corresponds to high function. It is not part of the usual stroke workup. The change of the FMA for UE after 90 days compared to the first score obtained on the stroke unit during the acute phase of the stroke event will serve as the primary endpoint of this study.
Shoulder abduction finger extension (SAFE) score: To calculate the SAFE score shoulder abduction and finger extension is measured using the classification of the British Medical Research Council (MRC). The MRC scale scores muscle strength from 0 (no movement) to 5 (normal power). The scores are added up producing a value from 0 to 10. A score of 5 or more predicts a good or excellent outcome after stroke affecting the UE. It is not part of the usual stroke workup.
Grip strength: The grip strength can be quantified using a dynamometer. The best out of three trials counts. It is not part of the usual stroke workup.
Bells test: The Bells test assesses neglect by requesting the subjects to cross all the bells (n = 35) which are mixed with distractors. Missing 5 bells counts as evidence for neglect. It is not part of the usual stroke workup.
Aphasie-Schnelltest (AST): The AST is a short test for patients with acute aphasia scored from 0 to 31 and inspecting comprehension, talking, reading, and writing. A low score reflects severe aphasia. It is not part of the usual stroke workup.
mRS: The mRS is a widely used test to determine impairment and dependency after stroke on a scale ranging from 0 (no symptoms) over 1 (symptoms but no disability), 2 (slight disability), 3 (requires help, but can walk without assistance), 4 (cannot walk without assistance), 5 (bedridden, severe disability, requires constant nursing) to 6 (death). It is part of the usual stroke workup.
Barthel Index (BI): Like the mRS the BI is part of the usual stroke workup. It measures abilities of daily living. The items can be scored from 0 to 15 points maximum, adding up to 0 to 100 points. A high score reflects high independency.
Action Research Arm Test (ARAT): The ARAT assesses the range of activity of the UE after stroke. It consists of the subscales grasp, grip, pinch and gross movements which are scored from 0 (no movement) over 1 (movement only partially possible), 2 (movement possible but only with great difficulty or needing much time) to 3 (normal movement), adding up to 57 points maximum. A score with less than 10 points reflects severe impairment. It is not part of the usual stroke workup.
Stroke Specific Quality Of Life scale (SS-QOL): The SS-QOL measures health related quality of life. It consists of 49 items which are scored from 1 to 5, adding up to 29-245 points. A high score reflects high quality of life. It is not part of the usual stroke workup.
Beck's Depression Inventory (BDI): The BDI is a depression screening tool consisting of 21 items which are scored from 0 to 3, adding up to 0 to 63 points. A high score reflects high possibility of depression, the threshold for a diagnosis of depression is 10. It is not part of the usual stroke workup.
Apart from the clinical tests described above clinical data (e. g. vital parameters, medication etc.) will be collected. In the Universitätsklinikum Tübingen (UKT) this data will be retrieved automatically from the clinic system. In the rehabilitation facilities number and duration of therapies as well as independent training of the patient will be documented and classified according to the type of neurorehabilitative training (e. g., with or without equipment). In addition, therapy-influencing co-factors like support by relatives are registered using a questionnaire with a scale from 0-3 (never/very poor to daily/very good).
Laboratory workup: Routine laboratory workup as part of the usual stroke workup will be collected.
Imaging: For each subject neuroimaging is acquired. If possible and meaningful, MRI is conducted including diffusion weighted imaging (DWI), fluid attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) and a Magnetic Prepared-Rapid Gradient Echo (MP-Rage) sequence. The first two sequences are part of the usual stroke workup, the MP-RAGE sequence is added to obtain a 3D anatomical data set for exact assessment of the localization and volume estimation of the stroke lesion.
The MRI images will be acquired at a 1,5 or 3 Tesla MRI scanner in the neuroradiological department of the UKT. The patient is placed in the scanner with earplugs and an emergency ball. Visual and verbal contact to the patient is maintained from the control room. Before scanning, patients are always evaluated by a medical doctor for MRI contraindications.
If an MRI is neither meaningful nor available or there are contraindications, a cranial computed tomography (CT) in the neuroradiological department will be performed. CTs are part of the usual stroke work-up, there will be no additional scanning apart from what is clinically necessary.
Functional MRI (fMRI): fMRI measures the blood-oxygenation-level dependent effect e. g. corresponding to specific task like moving the hand (task-related fMRI). Resting-state MRI determines functional brain networks of synchronized neural activity while the subject is resting (i.e. not performing a task). Resting-state fMRI and task-related fMRI will provide information about functional and effective connectivity, respectively. fMRI is not part of the usual stroke workup and requires additional scanning.
The fMRI images will be acquired at a Siemens 3 Tesla MRI scanner in the MRI Research Center of Tübingen (Department Biomedizinische Magnetresonanz, Prof. Dr. phil. nat. Dipl.-Phys. Klaus Scheffler, Hoppe-Seyler-Str. 3, 72076 Tübingen). The patient is placed in the scanner with earplugs and an emergency ball. Visual and verbal contact to the patient is maintained from the control room. No drugs or contrast agents are used during fMRI examinations.
For the task-related fMRI the patient will be asked to perform stereotypical whole-hand fist closings.
Patients are evaluated by a medical doctor for MRI contra-indications and need to give written informed consent before the scan. The investigators do not consider dental retainer wires over four teeth at most a contraindication. However, subjects will be informed additionally about current scientific consent and instructed to press the emergency ball in the unexpected case of heating of the retainer wire.
EEG: Resting-state EEG will be obtained using a 21-channel or 64-channel gel filled sintered ring electrode EEG cap (EasyCap, Munich, Germany) using the same optically isolated amplifier as described above (MEGA NeurOne Tesla, Kuopio, Finland). EEG will be recorded with eyes closed and eyes open for three minutes each in the same session in which the TEP and MEPs (described below) are acquired. EEG will always be performed before TMS (needed for TEPs and MEPs). If epileptic potentials are detected in EEG indicating an increased risk of seizure in the patient, TMS will not be conducted.
Electrooculography (EOG): Eye movements will be recorded from additional bipolar channels using the same optically isolated amplifier as for electromyography (EMG) and EEG recordings (MEGA NeurOne Tesla, see above). The EOG data will be used to aid EEG artefact rejection from eye movements and as a behavioral readout in saccade and decision tasks.
TMS: TMS is a technique which evokes action potentials in cortex with a spatiotemporal precision of millimeters and milliseconds. Conventional TMS stimulators (Mag \& More, Munich, Germany, Research 100; Magstim 200 als BiStim bzw. 1-4 Quadripulse Option; Magstim Super Rapid Plus) and EEG compatible coils will be used. Experiments will be MRI-guided, using a TMS navigator system (Localite GmbH) to map the exact individual stimulation sites. Subjects will be seated on a comfortable reclining chair with both arms relaxed.
EMG/MEP: Surface EMG will be obtained through an optically isolated battery powered biosignal amplifier (MEGA NeurOne Tesla, see above) using bipolar electrodes from hand muscles (first dorsal interosseous and abductor pollicis brevis extensor capri radialis muscles). MEPs are executed with pre-innervation of the target muscle or - if not possible - the contralateral side and maximum stimulator output (if required) to determine if the patient is MEP- or MEP+ (at least 50 μV peak-to-peak amplitude in the target muscle in at least 5 out of 10 consecutive trials). In case of MEP-, a paired-pulse protocol is conducted, which increases the probability to evoke a MEP and consecutively re-classify the subject as MEP+.
EEG/TEP: TEPs will be recorded with a TMS-compatible gel filled sintered ring electrode EEG cap with at least 64 channels (EasyCap, Munich, Germany) using the same optically isolated amplifier as described above (MEGA NeurOne Tesla, see above). During the EEG recordings at least 100 trials of single TMS pulses are applied to the motor hotspot of the ipsilesional M1 with a randomly jittered inter-trial interval of 7-8.0 s with 80% resting motor threshold (RMT). RMT is defined as stimulus intensity needed to evoke MEPs of 50 μV peak-to-peak amplitude in the target muscle in at least 5 out of 10 consecutive trials and will be determined for ipsilesional and contralesional M1. If no MEPs are detectable from the ipsilesional M1, the investigators will use the contralesional M1 for determining RMT and stimulator output and anatomical landmarks like the hand knob for locating the hotspot. To avoid auditory evoked potentials from the clicking noise of the coil patients will wear earplugs. Bone conductions is prevented by placing a thin layer of plastic film between the TMS coil and the EEG cap.
List of measurements which are part of the usual stroke workup:
- Clinical tests: NIHSS, mRS, BI
- Routine laboratory workup
- Imaging: CT or MRI (depending on medical indication)
List of measurements which are not part of the usual stroke workup:
- Clinical tests: FMA for UE and the sensory system, SAFE score, grip strength, Bells Test, AST, ARAT, SS-QOL scale, BDI
- Imaging: fMRI
- Electrophysiological measurements: EEG, MEPs, TEPs
Endpoints
Primary endpoint: Change in FMA of UE 3 months after the stroke event compared to FMA of UE within the first 25-48 hours after stroke onset.
Secondary end points: Secondary endpoints will be quality of life, independency and range of activity of the UE measured by SS-QOL, mRS, BI and ARAT respectively 3 months after the stroke event compared to the respective values obtained in the acute phase.
Subject inclusion and exclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria:
- Subject is 18 years or above.
- Subject has an acute stroke affecting one UE (FMA less than 50).
- Subject or caregiver understands the study and its procedures and gives informed consent.
- If the subject is not able to give informed consent:
- The assumed will of the patient is to be determined by the patient's provision (if existing), the health care proxy (if existing) and/or the moral concepts expressed by the patient to close relatives.
- o The legal representative gives informed consent because participation is the assumed will of the patient as assessed by the aforementioned points.
Exclusion criteria:
- Subject is less than 18 years old.
- The subject does not have an acute stroke, or stroke does not affect the UE, or FMA > 50.
- Subject or caregiver legal representative cannot give informed consent.
- Patient has an intracranial implant (e.g., aneurysm clips, shunts, stimulators, cochlear implants, or electrodes) or any other metal object within or near the head (excluding the mouth) that cannot be safely removed.
- Subject has a history of any illness that, in the opinion of the study investigator, might confound the results of the study or poses an additional risk to the subject by their participation in the study.
- There is any concern by the investigator regarding the safe participation of the subject in the study, or for any other reason the investigator considers the subject inappropriate for participation in the study.
- Subject is pregnant.
- Being tested
- no intervention
- Medical subject headings
- Stroke, Paresis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
no interventionOther
no intervention
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Acute stroke with affection of the upper extremity | * Subject is 18 years or above.
* Subject has an acute stroke affecting one UE (FMA less than 50).
* Subject or caregiver understands the study and its procedures and gives informed consent.
* If the subject is not able to give informed consent:
* The assumed will of the patient is to be determined by the patient's provision (if existing), the health care proxy (if existing) and/or the moral concepts expressed by the patient to close relatives.
* The legal representative gives informed consent because participation is the assumed will of the patient as assessed by the aforementioned points. Receives: Other: no intervention |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Motor outcome of the upper extremity (UE) after acute stroke
Fugl-Meyer Assessment for the upper extremity (FMA-UE) in the acute phase compared to the result after 90 days.
Measured: 90 days
Secondary outcomes (4)
Functional outcome of the UE after acute stroke
Action Research Arm Test (ARAT) in the acute phase compared to the result after 90 days.
Measured: 90 days
Independency in daily life after acute stroke
Modified Ranking Scale (mRS) in the acute phase compared to the result after 90 days.
Measured: 90 days
Independency in daily life after acute stroke
Barthel Index (BI) in the acute phase compared to the result after 90 days.
Measured: 90 days
Qualitiy of life after acute stroke
Stroke-Specific Quality Of Life scale (SS-QOL) scale in the acute phase compared to the result after 90 days.
Measured: 90 days
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted30 Dec 2020
- Study start1 Dec 2020
- Primary completion31 Mar 2022 (estimated)
- Study completion30 Jun 2022 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (35)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Stroke, AcuteStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University Hospital TuebingenThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Case only
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 500 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital Tuebingen
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Interfaculty Institute for Biomedical Informatics (IBMI), Cluster of Excellence - Machine Learning for Science, Department for diagnostic and interventional neuroradiology, University hospital of Tuebingen, Deparmet of biomedical magnetic resonance, University hospital of Tuebingen, Kliniken Schmieder, SRH-Kliniken
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Ulf Ziemann, PhD, M. d., Prof., Principal investigator, Head of the department of neurology of the university hospital Tuebingen and Hertie-Institut for clinical brain research
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04688970
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- BNP-2020-09
- Acronym
- MWKNeuroReha
- Status last verified
- Dec 2020
- First submitted
- 21 Dec 2020
- Last updated
- 30 Dec 2020
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Publications
Brott T, Adams HP Jr, Olinger CP, Marler JR, Barsan WG, Biller J, Spilker J, Holleran R, Eberle R, Hertzberg V, et al. Measurements of acute cerebral infarction: a clinical examination scale. Stroke. 1989 Jul;20(7):864-70. doi: 10.1161/01.str.20.7.864.
PubMed 2749846Casali AG, Gosseries O, Rosanova M, Boly M, Sarasso S, Casali KR, Casarotto S, Bruno MA, Laureys S, Tononi G, Massimini M. A theoretically based index of consciousness independent of sensory processing and behavior. Sci Transl Med. 2013 Aug 14;5(198):198ra105. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3006294.
PubMed 23946194Chen HF, Lin KC, Wu CY, Chen CL. Rasch validation and predictive validity of the action research arm test in patients receiving stroke rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012 Jun;93(6):1039-45. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2011.11.033. Epub 2012 Mar 14.
PubMed 22420887Compston A. Aids to the investigation of peripheral nerve injuries. Medical Research Council: Nerve Injuries Research Committee. His Majesty's Stationery Office: 1942; pp. 48 (iii) and 74 figures and 7 diagrams; with aids to the examination of the peripheral nervous system. By Michael O'Brien for the Guarantors of Brain. Saunders Elsevier: 2010; pp. [8] 64 and 94 Figures. Brain. 2010 Oct;133(10):2838-44. doi: 10.1093/brain/awq270. No abstract available.
PubMed 20928945Drozdowska BA, Singh S, Quinn TJ. Thinking About the Future: A Review of Prognostic Scales Used in Acute Stroke. Front Neurol. 2019 Mar 21;10:274. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2019.00274. eCollection 2019.
PubMed 30949127Fanciullacci C, Bertolucci F, Lamola G, Panarese A, Artoni F, Micera S, Rossi B, Chisari C. Delta Power Is Higher and More Symmetrical in Ischemic Stroke Patients with Cortical Involvement. Front Hum Neurosci. 2017 Jul 28;11:385. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2017.00385. eCollection 2017.
PubMed 28804453Finnigan S, van Putten MJ. EEG in ischaemic stroke: quantitative EEG can uniquely inform (sub-)acute prognoses and clinical management. Clin Neurophysiol. 2013 Jan;124(1):10-9. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2012.07.003. Epub 2012 Aug 2.
PubMed 22858178Gladstone DJ, Danells CJ, Black SE. The fugl-meyer assessment of motor recovery after stroke: a critical review of its measurement properties. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2002 Sep;16(3):232-40. doi: 10.1177/154596802401105171.
PubMed 12234086Grefkes C, Nowak DA, Eickhoff SB, Dafotakis M, Kust J, Karbe H, Fink GR. Cortical connectivity after subcortical stroke assessed with functional magnetic resonance imaging. Ann Neurol. 2008 Feb;63(2):236-46. doi: 10.1002/ana.21228.
PubMed 17896791Hutanu A, Iancu M, Balasa R, Maier S, Dobreanu M. Predicting functional outcome of ischemic stroke patients in Romania based on plasma CRP, sTNFR-1, D-Dimers, NGAL and NSE measured using a biochip array. Acta Pharmacol Sin. 2018 Jul;39(7):1228-1236. doi: 10.1038/aps.2018.26. Epub 2018 Jun 21.
PubMed 29926842He L, Wang J, Dong W. The clinical prognostic significance of hs-cTnT elevation in patients with acute ischemic stroke. BMC Neurol. 2018 Aug 20;18(1):118. doi: 10.1186/s12883-018-1121-5.
PubMed 30124165Heo J, Yoon JG, Park H, Kim YD, Nam HS, Heo JH. Machine Learning-Based Model for Prediction of Outcomes in Acute Stroke. Stroke. 2019 May;50(5):1263-1265. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.024293.
PubMed 30890116Kasner SE. Clinical interpretation and use of stroke scales. Lancet Neurol. 2006 Jul;5(7):603-12. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(06)70495-1.
PubMed 16781990Kim B, Winstein C. Can Neurological Biomarkers of Brain Impairment Be Used to Predict Poststroke Motor Recovery? A Systematic Review. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2017 Jan;31(1):3-24. doi: 10.1177/1545968316662708. Epub 2016 Aug 8.
PubMed 27503908Leao MT, Naros G, Gharabaghi A. Detecting poststroke cortical motor maps with biphasic single- and monophasic paired-pulse TMS. Brain Stimul. 2020 Jul-Aug;13(4):1102-1104. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2020.05.005. Epub 2020 May 8.
PubMed 32418913
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 30 Dec 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Personalized Neurorehabilitative Precision Medicine - From Data to Therapies
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04688970
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- MWKNeuroReha / BNP-2020-09
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 500 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital TuebingenUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Interfaculty Institute for Biomedical Informatics (IBMI), Cluster of Excellence - Machine Learning for Science, Department for diagnostic and interventional neuroradiology, University hospital of Tuebingen, Deparmet of biomedical magnetic resonance, University hospital of Tuebingen, Kliniken Schmieder, SRH-Kliniken
- Study start
- 1 Dec 2020 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Mar 2022 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 30 Jun 2022 (estimated)
- First posted
- 30 Dec 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Stroke is the most common neurological disease leaving one third dead and one third with permanent impairment despite best medical treatment. The aim of the present study is to investigate why patients differ in how they benefit from neurorehabilitation by collecting clinical, electrophysiological, imaging and laboratory data in the acute phase of stroke as well as later on during rehabilitation and after 90 days. Following a closed-loop approach the data is analyzed by a machine learning algorithm to create a personalized neurorehabilitation strategy.
Detailed description
Clinical tests: Each subject will be assessed using the following tests:
National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS): The NIHSS is part of the usual highly standardized stroke workup. It consists of 15 items which can be scored with 0 to 4 points maximum. It is used to measure stroke severity as well as impairment and to detect improvement or deterioration of the patient. A high score corresponds to a severe stroke.
FMA for UE and sensory system: The FMA for the UE and the sensory system describes the sensory-motor impairment of the arm after stroke. It consists of 66 items for the motor function of the UE and 24 items for the sensory function scored from 0 to 2. A high score corresponds to high function. It is not part of the usual stroke workup. The change of the FMA for UE after 90 days compared to the first score obtained on the stroke unit during the acute phase of the stroke event will serve as the primary endpoint of this study.
Shoulder abduction finger extension (SAFE) score: To calculate the SAFE score shoulder abduction and finger extension is measured using the classification of the British Medical Research Council (MRC). The MRC scale scores muscle strength from 0 (no movement) to 5 (normal power). The scores are added up producing a value from 0 to 10. A score of 5 or more predicts a good or excellent outcome after stroke affecting the UE. It is not part of the usual stroke workup.
Grip strength: The grip strength can be quantified using a dynamometer. The best out of three trials counts. It is not part of the usual stroke workup.
Bells test: The Bells test assesses neglect by requesting the subjects to cross all the bells (n = 35) which are mixed with distractors. Missing 5 bells counts as evidence for neglect. It is not part of the usual stroke workup.
Aphasie-Schnelltest (AST): The AST is a short test for patients with acute aphasia scored from 0 to 31 and inspecting comprehension, talking, reading, and writing. A low score reflects severe aphasia. It is not part of the usual stroke workup.
mRS: The mRS is a widely used test to determine impairment and dependency after stroke on a scale ranging from 0 (no symptoms) over 1 (symptoms but no disability), 2 (slight disability), 3 (requires help, but can walk without assistance), 4 (cannot walk without assistance), 5 (bedridden, severe disability, requires constant nursing) to 6 (death). It is part of the usual stroke workup.
Barthel Index (BI): Like the mRS the BI is part of the usual stroke workup. It measures abilities of daily living. The items can be scored from 0 to 15 points maximum, adding up to 0 to 100 points. A high score reflects high independency.
Action Research Arm Test (ARAT): The ARAT assesses the range of activity of the UE after stroke. It consists of the subscales grasp, grip, pinch and gross movements which are scored from 0 (no movement) over 1 (movement only partially possible), 2 (movement possible but only with great difficulty or needing much time) to 3 (normal movement), adding up to 57 points maximum. A score with less than 10 points reflects severe impairment. It is not part of the usual stroke workup.
Stroke Specific Quality Of Life scale (SS-QOL): The SS-QOL measures health related quality of life. It consists of 49 items which are scored from 1 to 5, adding up to 29-245 points. A high score reflects high quality of life. It is not part of the usual stroke workup.
Beck's Depression Inventory (BDI): The BDI is a depression screening tool consisting of 21 items which are scored from 0 to 3, adding up to 0 to 63 points. A high score reflects high possibility of depression, the threshold for a diagnosis of depression is 10. It is not part of the usual stroke workup.
Apart from the clinical tests described above clinical data (e. g. vital parameters, medication etc.) will be collected. In the Universitätsklinikum Tübingen (UKT) this data will be retrieved automatically from the clinic system. In the rehabilitation facilities number and duration of therapies as well as independent training of the patient will be documented and classified according to the type of neurorehabilitative training (e. g., with or without equipment). In addition, therapy-influencing co-factors like support by relatives are registered using a questionnaire with a scale from 0-3 (never/very poor to daily/very good).
Laboratory workup: Routine laboratory workup as part of the usual stroke workup will be collected.
Imaging: For each subject neuroimaging is acquired. If possible and meaningful, MRI is conducted including diffusion weighted imaging (DWI), fluid attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) and a Magnetic Prepared-Rapid Gradient Echo (MP-Rage) sequence. The first two sequences are part of the usual stroke workup, the MP-RAGE sequence is added to obtain a 3D anatomical data set for exact assessment of the localization and volume estimation of the stroke lesion.
The MRI images will be acquired at a 1,5 or 3 Tesla MRI scanner in the neuroradiological department of the UKT. The patient is placed in the scanner with earplugs and an emergency ball. Visual and verbal contact to the patient is maintained from the control room. Before scanning, patients are always evaluated by a medical doctor for MRI contraindications.
If an MRI is neither meaningful nor available or there are contraindications, a cranial computed tomography (CT) in the neuroradiological department will be performed. CTs are part of the usual stroke work-up, there will be no additional scanning apart from what is clinically necessary.
Functional MRI (fMRI): fMRI measures the blood-oxygenation-level dependent effect e. g. corresponding to specific task like moving the hand (task-related fMRI). Resting-state MRI determines functional brain networks of synchronized neural activity while the subject is resting (i.e. not performing a task). Resting-state fMRI and task-related fMRI will provide information about functional and effective connectivity, respectively. fMRI is not part of the usual stroke workup and requires additional scanning.
The fMRI images will be acquired at a Siemens 3 Tesla MRI scanner in the MRI Research Center of Tübingen (Department Biomedizinische Magnetresonanz, Prof. Dr. phil. nat. Dipl.-Phys. Klaus Scheffler, Hoppe-Seyler-Str. 3, 72076 Tübingen). The patient is placed in the scanner with earplugs and an emergency ball. Visual and verbal contact to the patient is maintained from the control room. No drugs or contrast agents are used during fMRI examinations.
For the task-related fMRI the patient will be asked to perform stereotypical whole-hand fist closings.
Patients are evaluated by a medical doctor for MRI contra-indications and need to give written informed consent before the scan. The investigators do not consider dental retainer wires over four teeth at most a contraindication. However, subjects will be informed additionally about current scientific consent and instructed to press the emergency ball in the unexpected case of heating of the retainer wire.
EEG: Resting-state EEG will be obtained using a 21-channel or 64-channel gel filled sintered ring electrode EEG cap (EasyCap, Munich, Germany) using the same optically isolated amplifier as described above (MEGA NeurOne Tesla, Kuopio, Finland). EEG will be recorded with eyes closed and eyes open for three minutes each in the same session in which the TEP and MEPs (described below) are acquired. EEG will always be performed before TMS (needed for TEPs and MEPs). If epileptic potentials are detected in EEG indicating an increased risk of seizure in the patient, TMS will not be conducted.
Electrooculography (EOG): Eye movements will be recorded from additional bipolar channels using the same optically isolated amplifier as for electromyography (EMG) and EEG recordings (MEGA NeurOne Tesla, see above). The EOG data will be used to aid EEG artefact rejection from eye movements and as a behavioral readout in saccade and decision tasks.
TMS: TMS is a technique which evokes action potentials in cortex with a spatiotemporal precision of millimeters and milliseconds. Conventional TMS stimulators (Mag \& More, Munich, Germany, Research 100; Magstim 200 als BiStim bzw. 1-4 Quadripulse Option; Magstim Super Rapid Plus) and EEG compatible coils will be used. Experiments will be MRI-guided, using a TMS navigator system (Localite GmbH) to map the exact individual stimulation sites. Subjects will be seated on a comfortable reclining chair with both arms relaxed.
EMG/MEP: Surface EMG will be obtained through an optically isolated battery powered biosignal amplifier (MEGA NeurOne Tesla, see above) using bipolar electrodes from hand muscles (first dorsal interosseous and abductor pollicis brevis extensor capri radialis muscles). MEPs are executed with pre-innervation of the target muscle or - if not possible - the contralateral side and maximum stimulator output (if required) to determine if the patient is MEP- or MEP+ (at least 50 μV peak-to-peak amplitude in the target muscle in at least 5 out of 10 consecutive trials). In case of MEP-, a paired-pulse protocol is conducted, which increases the probability to evoke a MEP and consecutively re-classify the subject as MEP+.
EEG/TEP: TEPs will be recorded with a TMS-compatible gel filled sintered ring electrode EEG cap with at least 64 channels (EasyCap, Munich, Germany) using the same optically isolated amplifier as described above (MEGA NeurOne Tesla, see above). During the EEG recordings at least 100 trials of single TMS pulses are applied to the motor hotspot of the ipsilesional M1 with a randomly jittered inter-trial interval of 7-8.0 s with 80% resting motor threshold (RMT). RMT is defined as stimulus intensity needed to evoke MEPs of 50 μV peak-to-peak amplitude in the target muscle in at least 5 out of 10 consecutive trials and will be determined for ipsilesional and contralesional M1. If no MEPs are detectable from the ipsilesional M1, the investigators will use the contralesional M1 for determining RMT and stimulator output and anatomical landmarks like the hand knob for locating the hotspot. To avoid auditory evoked potentials from the clicking noise of the coil patients will wear earplugs. Bone conductions is prevented by placing a thin layer of plastic film between the TMS coil and the EEG cap.
List of measurements which are part of the usual stroke workup:
- Clinical tests: NIHSS, mRS, BI
- Routine laboratory workup
- Imaging: CT or MRI (depending on medical indication)
List of measurements which are not part of the usual stroke workup:
- Clinical tests: FMA for UE and the sensory system, SAFE score, grip strength, Bells Test, AST, ARAT, SS-QOL scale, BDI
- Imaging: fMRI
- Electrophysiological measurements: EEG, MEPs, TEPs
Endpoints
Primary endpoint: Change in FMA of UE 3 months after the stroke event compared to FMA of UE within the first 25-48 hours after stroke onset.
Secondary end points: Secondary endpoints will be quality of life, independency and range of activity of the UE measured by SS-QOL, mRS, BI and ARAT respectively 3 months after the stroke event compared to the respective values obtained in the acute phase.
Subject inclusion and exclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria:
- Subject is 18 years or above.
- Subject has an acute stroke affecting one UE (FMA less than 50).
- Subject or caregiver understands the study and its procedures and gives informed consent.
- If the subject is not able to give informed consent:
- The assumed will of the patient is to be determined by the patient's provision (if existing), the health care proxy (if existing) and/or the moral concepts expressed by the patient to close relatives.
- o The legal representative gives informed consent because participation is the assumed will of the patient as assessed by the aforementioned points.
Exclusion criteria:
- Subject is less than 18 years old.
- The subject does not have an acute stroke, or stroke does not affect the UE, or FMA > 50.
- Subject or caregiver legal representative cannot give informed consent.
- Patient has an intracranial implant (e.g., aneurysm clips, shunts, stimulators, cochlear implants, or electrodes) or any other metal object within or near the head (excluding the mouth) that cannot be safely removed.
- Subject has a history of any illness that, in the opinion of the study investigator, might confound the results of the study or poses an additional risk to the subject by their participation in the study.
- There is any concern by the investigator regarding the safe participation of the subject in the study, or for any other reason the investigator considers the subject inappropriate for participation in the study.
- Subject is pregnant.
Study design
- Observational model
- Case only
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Acute stroke with affection of the upper extremity | – | Other: no intervention* Subject is 18 years or above. * Subject has an acute stroke affecting one UE (FMA less than 50). * Subject or caregiver understands the study and its procedures and gives informed consent. * If the subject is not able to give informed consent: * The assumed will of the patient is to be determined by the patient's provision (if existing), the health care proxy (if existing) and/or the moral concepts expressed by the patient to close relatives. * The legal representative gives informed consent because participation is the assumed will of the patient as assessed by the aforementioned points. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- We aim to include all patients with acute stroke affecting the UE (FMA less than 50) on our SU. Other symptoms like aphasia or neglect are no reason for exclusion since we intend to include as many patients as possible to capture the whole spectrum of stroke from mild to severe. Especially the last case, the inclusion of severely affected patients, is of utmost importance in our view. Due to their grave impairments they have the greatest need for neurorehabilitation; at the same time, this group of patients is the most vulnerable because of their preexisting comorbidities and conditions coming with immobility e. g. pneumonia. A personalized treatment would meet their need for intense rehabilitation while providing enough recreation time since unnecessary, ineffective rehabilitation could be omitted.
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Subject is 18 years or above.
- Subject has an acute stroke affecting one UE (FMA less than 50).
- Subject or understands the study and its procedures and gives informed consent.
- If the subject is not able to give informed consent:
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Subject is less than 18 years old.
- The subject does not have an acute stroke, or stroke does not affect the UE, or FMA > 50.
- Subject or legal representative cannot give informed consent.
- Patient has an intracranial implant (e.g., aneurysm clips, shunts, stimulators, cochlear implants, or electrodes) or any other metal object within or near the head (excluding the mouth) that cannot be safely removed.
- Subject has a history of any illness that, in the opinion of the study investigator, might confound the results of the study or poses an additional risk to the subject by their participation in the study.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| no interventionno intervention | Other | Acute stroke with affection of the upper extremity |
Primary outcome
Motor outcome of the upper extremity (UE) after acute stroke
Time frame: 90 days
Fugl-Meyer Assessment for the upper extremity (FMA-UE) in the acute phase compared to the result after 90 days.
4 secondary outcomes
Functional outcome of the UE after acute stroke
Time frame: 90 days
Independency in daily life after acute stroke
Time frame: 90 days
Independency in daily life after acute stroke
Time frame: 90 days
Qualitiy of life after acute stroke
Time frame: 90 days
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 30 Dec 2020.
- Background: PubMed 2749846Brott T, Adams HP Jr, Olinger CP, Marler JR, Barsan WG, Biller J, Spilker J, Holleran R, Eberle R, Hertzberg V, et al. Measurements of acute cerebral infarction: a clinical examination scale. Stroke. 1989 Jul;20(7):864-70. doi: 10.1161/01.str.20.7.864.
- Background: PubMed 23946194Casali AG, Gosseries O, Rosanova M, Boly M, Sarasso S, Casali KR, Casarotto S, Bruno MA, Laureys S, Tononi G, Massimini M. A theoretically based index of consciousness independent of sensory processing and behavior. Sci Transl Med. 2013 Aug 14;5(198):198ra105. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3006294.
- Background: PubMed 22420887Chen HF, Lin KC, Wu CY, Chen CL. Rasch validation and predictive validity of the action research arm test in patients receiving stroke rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012 Jun;93(6):1039-45. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2011.11.033. Epub 2012 Mar 14.
- Background: PubMed 20928945Compston A. Aids to the investigation of peripheral nerve injuries. Medical Research Council: Nerve Injuries Research Committee. His Majesty's Stationery Office: 1942; pp. 48 (iii) and 74 figures and 7 diagrams; with aids to the examination of the peripheral nervous system. By Michael O'Brien for the Guarantors of Brain. Saunders Elsevier: 2010; pp. [8] 64 and 94 Figures. Brain. 2010 Oct;133(10):2838-44. doi: 10.1093/brain/awq270. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 30949127Drozdowska BA, Singh S, Quinn TJ. Thinking About the Future: A Review of Prognostic Scales Used in Acute Stroke. Front Neurol. 2019 Mar 21;10:274. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2019.00274. eCollection 2019.
- Background: PubMed 28804453Fanciullacci C, Bertolucci F, Lamola G, Panarese A, Artoni F, Micera S, Rossi B, Chisari C. Delta Power Is Higher and More Symmetrical in Ischemic Stroke Patients with Cortical Involvement. Front Hum Neurosci. 2017 Jul 28;11:385. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2017.00385. eCollection 2017.
- Background: PubMed 22858178Finnigan S, van Putten MJ. EEG in ischaemic stroke: quantitative EEG can uniquely inform (sub-)acute prognoses and clinical management. Clin Neurophysiol. 2013 Jan;124(1):10-9. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2012.07.003. Epub 2012 Aug 2.
- Background: PubMed 12234086Gladstone DJ, Danells CJ, Black SE. The fugl-meyer assessment of motor recovery after stroke: a critical review of its measurement properties. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2002 Sep;16(3):232-40. doi: 10.1177/154596802401105171.
- Background: PubMed 17896791Grefkes C, Nowak DA, Eickhoff SB, Dafotakis M, Kust J, Karbe H, Fink GR. Cortical connectivity after subcortical stroke assessed with functional magnetic resonance imaging. Ann Neurol. 2008 Feb;63(2):236-46. doi: 10.1002/ana.21228.
- Background: PubMed 29926842Hutanu A, Iancu M, Balasa R, Maier S, Dobreanu M. Predicting functional outcome of ischemic stroke patients in Romania based on plasma CRP, sTNFR-1, D-Dimers, NGAL and NSE measured using a biochip array. Acta Pharmacol Sin. 2018 Jul;39(7):1228-1236. doi: 10.1038/aps.2018.26. Epub 2018 Jun 21.
- Background: PubMed 30124165He L, Wang J, Dong W. The clinical prognostic significance of hs-cTnT elevation in patients with acute ischemic stroke. BMC Neurol. 2018 Aug 20;18(1):118. doi: 10.1186/s12883-018-1121-5.
- Background: PubMed 30890116Heo J, Yoon JG, Park H, Kim YD, Nam HS, Heo JH. Machine Learning-Based Model for Prediction of Outcomes in Acute Stroke. Stroke. 2019 May;50(5):1263-1265. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.024293.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Stroke, Acute
Not yet recruiting
Temporal Interference Stimulation for Upper-Limb Motor Recovery in Early Subacute Stroke
Acute Ischemic Stroke
RecruitingObservational study
ELATE Study: Evaluating Large-vessel Acute Thrombectomy in Extended Time Window
Acute Ichemic Stroke
Not yet recruiting
Selective Intra-Arterial Hypothermia After Endovascular Treatment for Acute Basilar Artery Occlusion
Acute Ischemic Stroke, Basilar Artery Occlusion
RecruitingObservational study
Continuous Dual Aspiration Technique With Zoom System for Stroke
Ischemic Stroke, Acute Stroke
Not yet recruitingPhase 2/3
A Multicenter, Open-label, Randomized, Non-inferiority Clinical Trial With Blinded Endpoint Assessment of Early Tirofiban After Intravenous Thrombolysis in Acute Ischemic Stroke
Acute Ischemic Stroke
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Ulf Ziemann, PhD, M. d., Prof. principal investigator
Head of the department of neurology of the university hospital Tuebingen and Hertie-Institut for clinical brain research
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Stroke, Acute and Outcome, Improvement, run by University Hospital Tuebingen at 1 site in Germany.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 Dec 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Germany. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Corinna Blum, PhD, M.d. (+4970712961788, neuroreha@med.uni-tuebingen.de), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Motor outcome of the upper extremity (UE) after acute stroke (time frame: 90 days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04688970, which also lists 35 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 Dec 2020.