Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia, AdultPhase 2EWALL-Ph-03NCT04688983
Study in Adult Ph-positive ALL
A Phase 2 study testing Ponatinib, Blinatumomab and Imatinib in people with Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia, Adult, run by Cardiff University.
Trial summary
An Open Label, 3-arm, Randomised Phase II Study to Compare the Safety and Efficacy of Ponatinib in Combination With Either Chemotherapy or Blinatumomab With Imatinib Plus Chemotherapy as Front-line Therapy for Patients Aged 55 Years and Over With Philadelphia Chromosome Positive (Ph+ or BCR-ABL+) Acute Lymphoblastic… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 55 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia, Adult
- What is being tested?
- Ponatinib, Blinatumomab and Imatinib
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 180 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- Jan 2021to Jan 2026
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 55 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Male or female patients > 55 years (biological age)
- Philadelphia chromosome or BCR-ABL positive acute lymphoblastic leukaemia
- Not previously treated except with corticosteroids, single dose vincristine or up to three doses of cyclophosphamide (maximum cumulative dose 1g/m2) or intrathecal therapy to control meningeal leukaemia
- No uncontrolled CNS involvement
- WHO performance status <2
- Normal serum levels > LLN (lower limit of normal) of potassium and magnesium, or corrected to within normal limits with supplements, prior to the first dose of study medication
Show all 10Show fewer
- Signed written inform consent
- Molecular evaluation for BCR-ABL1 performed
- Willingness of sexually active male subjects whose sexual partners are women of childbearing potential (WOCBP), to use an effective form of contraception (pearl index < 1%) during the study and at least 6 months thereafter. Effective forms of contraception are complete sexual abstinence (refraining from heterosexual intercourse during the entire period of risk associated with the study treatments), combined oral contraceptive, hormone IUCD, vaginal hormone ring, transdermal contraceptive patch, contraceptive implant or depot contraceptive injection in combination with a second method of contraception like a condom or a cervical cap / diaphragm with spermicide or surgical sterilisation (vasectomy) in male patients.
- Women of non-childbearing potential defined as sexually mature women who have undergone a hysterectomy or surgical sterilization or who have been naturally postmenopausal for at least 12 consecutive months (i.e., who has had menses any time in the preceding 12 consecutive months).
Who cannot join
- Patient previously treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors
- Known impaired cardiac function, including any of the following:
- LVEF < 40%
- Complete left bundle branch block
- Right bundle branch block plus left anterior hemiblock, bifascicular block
- History of or presence of clinically significant ventricular or atrial tachyarrhythmias
Show all 24Show fewer
- Clinically significant resting bradycardia (< 50 beats per minute)
- Congenital long QT syndrome or QTcF >470 msec on screening ECG. If QTc > 470 msec and electrolytes are not within normal ranges before ponatinib dosing, electrolytes should be corrected and then the patient rescreened for QTcF criterion.
- Myocardial infarction within 12 months prior to starting study treatment
- Other clinical significant heart disease (e.g. unstable angina, congestive heart failure, uncontrolled hypertension)
- Symptomatic peripheral vascular disease
- Any history of ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attacks (TIAs)
- Patients with a history of another primary malignancy that is currently clinically significant or currently requires active intervention
- History or presence of clinically relevant CNS pathology such as epilepsy, childhood or adult seizure, paresis, aphasia, stroke, severe brain injuries, dementia, Parkinson's disease, cerebellar disease, organic brain syndrome, psychosis (with exception of CNS leukemia that is well controlled with intrathecal therapy)
- Active ALL in the CNS (confirmed by CSF analysis) or testes (by clinical assessment).
- Autoimmune disease with potential CNS involvement
- Known diagnosis of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection (HIV testing is not mandatory) or active infection with Hepatitis B or C
- Treatment with any other investigational agent or participating in another trial within 30 days prior to entering this study
- Inadequate hepatic functions defined as ASAT or ALAT > 2,5 times the institutional upper limit of normal or > 5 times ULN if considered due to leukemia
- Total bilirubin > 1.5-fold the institutional upper limit unless considered to be due to organ involvement by the leukemia or to M. Gilbert / M. Meulengracht
- Concurrent severe diseases which exclude the administration of therapy
- Chronic pancreatitis or acute pancreatitis as evidenced by clinical symptomatology and/or imaging within 6 months of study entry
- Pregnant or lactating females
- Patients unwilling or unable to comply with the protocol
Trial locations and contacts
No sites are listed yet.
Ian Thomas contact
About this study
Official title: An Open Label, 3-arm, Randomised Phase II Study to Compare the Safety and Efficacy of Ponatinib in Combination With Either Chemotherapy or Blinatumomab With Imatinib Plus Chemotherapy as Front-line Therapy for Patients Aged 55 Years and Over With Philadelphia Chromosome Positive (Ph+ or BCR-ABL+) Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL)
An Open Label, 3-arm, Randomised Phase II Study to Compare the Safety and Efficacy of Ponatinib in Combination With Either Chemotherapy or Blinatumomab With Imatinib Plus Chemotherapy as Front-line Therapy for Patients Aged 55 Years and Over With Philadelphia Chromosome Positive (Ph+ or BCR-ABL+) Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL)
Read the detailed description
Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) develops when a certain type of immature bone marrow cell called a lymphoblast becomes malignant, resulting in uncontrolled growth and suppression of normal blood cell development. Leukemic blast cells accumulate in the bone marrow and blood and may involve other organs such as the central nervous system (CNS). The most frequent subtype of ALL observed in adults is caused by a genetic aberration called a Philadelphia (Ph) chromosome and is thus referred to as Ph+ ALL. In this type of ALL, a gene called BCR and a gene called ABL are fused by a process known as translocation. This leads to formation of an atypical gene called BCR-ABL and formation of a protein known as the BCR-ABL oncoprotein. This protein, a so-called tyrosine kinase, activates and disrupts many signaling pathways in the cell and is directly responsible for the development of Ph+ ALL, which is one of the most aggressive types of leukaemia.
Treatment options for Ph+ ALL were much improved by a family of drugs called tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI), which bind to - and block the activity of - the BCR-ABL kinase. The first of these drugs to be developed is called imatinib (brand name glivec), which has become a standard component of therapy for Ph+ ALL worldwide, usually combined with steroids and/or cytotoxic chemotherapy typically used for ALL. In the vast majority of patients, this treatment is initially able to reduce the burden of the disease to a very low level (complete remission). Unfortunately, the leukemic cells eventually become resistant to imatinib, causing the disease to reappear (relapse). A commonly observed mechanism of resistance to TKI is the development of mutations in the BCR-ABL gene, as a result of which the drug can no longer bind to the kinase, leading to its reactivation. For this reason, stem cell transplantation from a sibling or unrelated donor is considered the most effective treatment to achieve cure.
In the last couple of years, 2nd generation TKI (Dasatinib and Nilotinib) which are more active than imatinib have been tested in clinical trials in patients with Ph+ ALL. Although these newer TKI show activity towards mutated BCR-ABL not inhibited by imatinib, the same basic mechanisms of resistance apply to these drugs, and they have not been shown to result in substantially longer survival than imatinib. In particular, a BCR-ABL mutation known as T315I has been recognized to cause resistance to all approved 1st and 2nd generation TKI.
More recently, a highly potent 3rd generation TKI called ponatinib has been developed and is the only approved TKI shown to be active against the T315I and all other resistance mutations. Initial studies combining ponatinib with chemotherapy have shown excellent response rates and promising survival in adult patients with newly diagnosed Ph+ ALL. However, in this group of patients ponatinib has not yet been directly compared with any of the other drugs, and there may be a moderately increased risk of vascular and cardiac adverse events, such as heart attacks, strokes or thrombosis.
Based on existing data, ponatinib shows great promise for treatment of Ph+ ALL, but its superiority over standard imatinib-based therapy in terms of long-term efficacy and safety need to be proven.
It is the main purpose of this trial to determine whether ponatinib is superior to imatinib when combined with the same chemotherapy that is considered a standard for elderly patients with Ph+ ALL. The study hypothesis is that a greater proportion of patients in the ponatinib arm will achieve a deep (molecular) response, and that survival without leukemia relapse will be superior. The side effects, safety and tolerability of the two treatment regimens will also be compared.
A second trial question will explore whether chemotherapy can be omitted from the treatment regimen by replacing it with an immunotherapy drug called blinatumomab. This is a type of antibody that activated the patient´s own immune cells (T-cells) and directs them to the leukaemia cells, which are then destroyed. This type of treatment has been very effective in patients with ALL that did not respond or returned after other types of therapy, and has been approved in the EU and USA as salvage therapy for ALL. By combining two very different types of targeted therapy, the TKI ponatinib and the antibody blinatumomab, we hope to deliver highly effective therapy for Ph+ ALL while eliminating the toxicity of chemotherapy.
To be able to compare these treatments, patients will be randomly assigned to the three treatment arms in a 1:1:1 ratio, i.e. the likelihood to be assigned to each of the treatment groups is the same. Overall duration of study treatment will be 2 years, followed by treatment with the TKI alone.
- Conditions
- Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia, Adult
- Being tested
- Ponatinib, Blinatumomab, Imatinib
- Medical subject headings
- Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
PonatinibDrug
30 mg QD starting day 1, given continuously unless interruption required for toxicity
BlinatumomabDrug
Also called Blincyto
A single cycle of blinatumomab treatment is 6 weeks in duration, which includes 4 weeks of blinatumomab CIVI followed by a 2-week treatment-free interval.
ImatinibDrug
starting day 1, given orally at 400mg BID continuously for 8 weeks
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Arm 1 | Active comparator | Ponatinib plus standard induction and consolidation Receives: Drug: Ponatinib |
| Arm 2 | Active comparator | Imatinib plus standard induction and consolidation (comparator arm) Receives: Drug: Imatinib |
| Arm 3 | Experimental | Ponatinib plus Blinatumomab Receives: Drug: Ponatinib; Drug: Blinatumomab |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Number of patients with a demonstrable molecular response
Achievement of a molecular response in treatment arms 1 and 2 defined by a BCR-ABL1/ABL1 (B/A) transcript ratio of ≤10-4 by the time point scheduled for MRD analysis
Measured: Within 5 months after start of study treatment
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted30 Dec 2020
- Study startJan 2021 (estimated)
- Primary completionJan 2024 (estimated)
- Study completionJan 2026 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia, AdultStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Factorial
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 180 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Cardiff University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04688983
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- SPON-1751-19
- Acronym
- EWALL-Ph-03
- Status last verified
- Dec 2020
- First submitted
- 17 Dec 2020
- Last updated
- 30 Dec 2020
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: Access to data is subject to the standard operation procedures of the Sponsor, and requests for data will be reviewed accordingly. Data sharing is actively encouraged by accredited clinical trials units.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 30 Dec 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- An Open Label, 3-arm, Randomised Phase II Study to Compare the Safety and Efficacy of Ponatinib in Combination With Either Chemotherapy or Blinatumomab With Imatinib Plus Chemotherapy as Front-line Therapy for Patients Aged 55 Years and Over With Philadelphia Chromosome Positive (Ph+ or BCR-ABL+) Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04688983
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- EWALL-Ph-03 / SPON-1751-19
- Conditions
- Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia, Adult
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 180 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Cardiff UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Jan 2021 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- Jan 2024 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Jan 2026 (estimated)
- First posted
- 30 Dec 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
An Open Label, 3-arm, Randomised Phase II Study to Compare the Safety and Efficacy of Ponatinib in Combination With Either Chemotherapy or Blinatumomab With Imatinib Plus Chemotherapy as Front-line Therapy for Patients Aged 55 Years and Over With Philadelphia Chromosome Positive (Ph+ or BCR-ABL+) Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL)
Detailed description
Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) develops when a certain type of immature bone marrow cell called a lymphoblast becomes malignant, resulting in uncontrolled growth and suppression of normal blood cell development. Leukemic blast cells accumulate in the bone marrow and blood and may involve other organs such as the central nervous system (CNS). The most frequent subtype of ALL observed in adults is caused by a genetic aberration called a Philadelphia (Ph) chromosome and is thus referred to as Ph+ ALL. In this type of ALL, a gene called BCR and a gene called ABL are fused by a process known as translocation. This leads to formation of an atypical gene called BCR-ABL and formation of a protein known as the BCR-ABL oncoprotein. This protein, a so-called tyrosine kinase, activates and disrupts many signaling pathways in the cell and is directly responsible for the development of Ph+ ALL, which is one of the most aggressive types of leukaemia.
Treatment options for Ph+ ALL were much improved by a family of drugs called tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI), which bind to - and block the activity of - the BCR-ABL kinase. The first of these drugs to be developed is called imatinib (brand name glivec), which has become a standard component of therapy for Ph+ ALL worldwide, usually combined with steroids and/or cytotoxic chemotherapy typically used for ALL. In the vast majority of patients, this treatment is initially able to reduce the burden of the disease to a very low level (complete remission). Unfortunately, the leukemic cells eventually become resistant to imatinib, causing the disease to reappear (relapse). A commonly observed mechanism of resistance to TKI is the development of mutations in the BCR-ABL gene, as a result of which the drug can no longer bind to the kinase, leading to its reactivation. For this reason, stem cell transplantation from a sibling or unrelated donor is considered the most effective treatment to achieve cure.
In the last couple of years, 2nd generation TKI (Dasatinib and Nilotinib) which are more active than imatinib have been tested in clinical trials in patients with Ph+ ALL. Although these newer TKI show activity towards mutated BCR-ABL not inhibited by imatinib, the same basic mechanisms of resistance apply to these drugs, and they have not been shown to result in substantially longer survival than imatinib. In particular, a BCR-ABL mutation known as T315I has been recognized to cause resistance to all approved 1st and 2nd generation TKI.
More recently, a highly potent 3rd generation TKI called ponatinib has been developed and is the only approved TKI shown to be active against the T315I and all other resistance mutations. Initial studies combining ponatinib with chemotherapy have shown excellent response rates and promising survival in adult patients with newly diagnosed Ph+ ALL. However, in this group of patients ponatinib has not yet been directly compared with any of the other drugs, and there may be a moderately increased risk of vascular and cardiac adverse events, such as heart attacks, strokes or thrombosis.
Based on existing data, ponatinib shows great promise for treatment of Ph+ ALL, but its superiority over standard imatinib-based therapy in terms of long-term efficacy and safety need to be proven.
It is the main purpose of this trial to determine whether ponatinib is superior to imatinib when combined with the same chemotherapy that is considered a standard for elderly patients with Ph+ ALL. The study hypothesis is that a greater proportion of patients in the ponatinib arm will achieve a deep (molecular) response, and that survival without leukemia relapse will be superior. The side effects, safety and tolerability of the two treatment regimens will also be compared.
A second trial question will explore whether chemotherapy can be omitted from the treatment regimen by replacing it with an immunotherapy drug called blinatumomab. This is a type of antibody that activated the patient´s own immune cells (T-cells) and directs them to the leukaemia cells, which are then destroyed. This type of treatment has been very effective in patients with ALL that did not respond or returned after other types of therapy, and has been approved in the EU and USA as salvage therapy for ALL. By combining two very different types of targeted therapy, the TKI ponatinib and the antibody blinatumomab, we hope to deliver highly effective therapy for Ph+ ALL while eliminating the toxicity of chemotherapy.
To be able to compare these treatments, patients will be randomly assigned to the three treatment arms in a 1:1:1 ratio, i.e. the likelihood to be assigned to each of the treatment groups is the same. Overall duration of study treatment will be 2 years, followed by treatment with the TKI alone.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Factorial
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Arm 1 | Active comparator | Drug: PonatinibPonatinib plus standard induction and consolidation |
| Arm 2 | Active comparator | Drug: ImatinibImatinib plus standard induction and consolidation (comparator arm) |
| Arm 3 | Experimental | Drug: Ponatinib, Drug: BlinatumomabPonatinib plus Blinatumomab |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 55 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (10 listed)
- Male or female patients > 55 years (biological age)
- Philadelphia chromosome or BCR-ABL positive acute lymphoblastic leukaemia
- Not previously treated except with corticosteroids, single dose vincristine or up to three doses of cyclophosphamide (maximum cumulative dose 1g/m2) or intrathecal therapy to control meningeal leukaemia
- No uncontrolled CNS involvement
- WHO performance status <2
Key exclusion criteria (24 listed)
- Patient previously treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors
- Known impaired cardiac function, including any of the following:
- Symptomatic peripheral vascular disease
- Any history of ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attacks (TIAs)
- Patients with a history of another primary malignancy that is currently clinically significant or currently requires active intervention
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Ponatinib30 mg QD starting day 1, given continuously unless interruption required for toxicity | Drug | Arm 1, Arm 3 |
| BlinatumomabAlso: BlincytoA single cycle of blinatumomab treatment is 6 weeks in duration, which includes 4 weeks of blinatumomab CIVI followed by a 2-week treatment-free interval. | Drug | Arm 3 |
| Imatinibstarting day 1, given orally at 400mg BID continuously for 8 weeks | Drug | Arm 2 |
Primary outcome
Number of patients with a demonstrable molecular response
Time frame: Within 5 months after start of study treatment
Achievement of a molecular response in treatment arms 1 and 2 defined by a BCR-ABL1/ABL1 (B/A) transcript ratio of ≤10-4 by the time point scheduled for MRD analysis
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 30 Dec 2020.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. Access to data is subject to the standard operation procedures of the Sponsor, and requests for data will be reviewed accordingly. Data sharing is actively encouraged by accredited clinical trials units.
Related trials for Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia, Adult
RecruitingPhase 1
Testing the Addition of an Anti-cancer Drug, Lenalidomide, to the Usual Combination Chemotherapy Treatment ("EPOCH") for Adult T-Cell Leukemia-Lymphoma (ATLL)
Acute Adult T-Cell Leukemia/Lymphoma, Adult T-Cell Leukemia/Lymphoma
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Combination Chemotherapy With or Without Donor Stem Cell Transplant in Treating Patients With Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia, Adult B Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Infection Prophylaxis and Management in Treating Cytomegalovirus (CMV) Infection in Patients With Hematologic Malignancies Previously Treated With Donor Stem Cell Transplant
Hematopoietic/Lymphoid Cancer, Accelerated Phase Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
Combination Chemotherapy With or Without Bortezomib in Treating Younger Patients With Newly Diagnosed T-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia or Stage II-IV T-Cell Lymphoblastic Lymphoma
Adult T Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia, Ann Arbor Stage II Adult Lymphoblastic Lymphoma
RecruitingPhase 2
CAR T-cell Therapy in Patients With Renal Dysfunction
Non-hodgkin Lymphoma,B Cell, Multiple Myeloma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Ian Thomas contact
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Ponatinib, Blinatumomab and Imatinib in people with Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia, Adult, run by Cardiff University.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 10 inclusion and 24 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 Dec 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Oliver Ottmann (02920742375, ottmanno@cardiff.ac.uk), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Number of patients with a demonstrable molecular response (time frame: Within 5 months after start of study treatment). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 Dec 2020; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 30 Oct 2026.