Nurse's RoleNCT04690712
Health Education Provided to Primary School Students
A study testing Health Education in people with Nurse's Role and Health Behavior, run by KTO Karatay University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
Trial summary
This study was conducted in a primary school in turkey.It was aimed to examine the effects of health education given to children in primary school period.As a result, it has been seen that education can be effective. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 7 to 12 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Nurse's Role, Health Behavior
- What is being tested?
- Health Education
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine, Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 400 participants
- Where
- 1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
- Study dates
- 7 May 2019to 21 Feb 2020
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 7 to 12 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child
Who may be able to join
- All students who regularly attend school at Saraçoğlu TOKI Primary School and who had no communication problems and whose parents gave their research approval were included in the study.
Who cannot join
- Students who could not attend school were excluded from the study.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: The Effect of Health Education Provided to Primary School Students on Screening Results
This study was conducted in a primary school in turkey.It was aimed to examine the effects of health education given to children in primary school period.As a result, it has been seen that education can be effective.
Read the detailed description
Investigation of the Effects of Health Education Provided to Saraçoğlu Toki Mustafa Çetin Primary School Students on Health Screening Results The aim of this study is to find the effect of health education given to primary school students on health screening results.
The research is a pre-test and post-test quasi-experimental model with a single subject group. Saracoglu Toki Mustafa Cetin Primary School is that located in Turkey; It was held between September 2019 and March 2020. It was aimed to reach the entire universe, not choosing the sample. The pre-test screening was completed with 460 students and the post-test screening with 400 students. An Introductory Information Form and Screening Test Application Form were used to collect data. After the health education was given by the researchers using visual, auditory materials and drama technique, the results were evaluated.
- Conditions
- Nurse's Role, Health Behavior
- Being tested
- Health Education
- Medical subject headings
- Health Behavior
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Health EducationBehavioural
All students who attended the school were provided training by the researchers to improve oral and dental health and general hygiene. These trainings were made using slide shows and various entertaining materials. In addition, education was transformed into a drama with a theater show, and the importance of hand washing, hair and toilet hygiene was explained.
In addition to hygiene, students were given training on correct eating patterns for a day so that they could develop healthy.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Socio-Demographic Characteristics of Students | No intervention | When the socio-demographic characteristics of the students are examined according to the pre-test findings; It was seen that 27% were in the first grade, 20.9% in the second grade, and 25.7% in the third grade. When the age groups were evaluated, it was determined that 47.8% were in the 7-8 age group, 51.5% were in the 9-10 age group and 50% of them were female students and 50% were male students. It was observed that 27.6% of the students had a bad income and 59.3% had a medium level of income. When the father's education status was questioned, it was determined that 17.6% of them did not finish primary school, 55.4% of them were primary school graduates, 2.6% of them were high school graduates. On the other hand, 55% of their mothers did not complete primary school, 43.5% were primary school graduates and 1.5% were secondary school graduates |
| Comparison of Students' Pretest and Posttest Development Screening Average | Experimental | According to the results of height and weight screening at the pre-test stage; the average height of the students is 127.0 ± 9.11; It was determined that the average weight was 26.1 ± 6.19, the average height was 130.61 ± 8.83 and the average weight was 29.92 ± 6.39 in the final test stage. A significant difference was found between pre-test and post-test screening results Receives: Behavioral: Health Education |
| Comparison of Pre-Test and Post-Test Screening Results of Students | Experimental | In the statistical evaluation, it was found that there was no significant difference between pre-test and post-test screening results Receives: Behavioral: Health Education |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Screening Tests Application Form
This form developed by the researchers by scanning the literature; It consists of a total of six screening phases including height, weight, oral hygiene, scalp hygiene / lice-dandruff and snellen / vision tests. It was used by the researchers to determine the results of the scan by selecting "yes", "no" options.
Measured: 6 months
Introductory Information Form
While collecting the data, an Introductory Information Form developed by the researchers, consisting of eight questions including questions such as class, age, gender, family income, father's education level, mother's education status, father's occupation and mother's occupation, was used.
Measured: 1 week
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted31 Dec 2020
- Study start7 May 2019
- Primary completion25 Oct 2019
- Study completion21 Feb 2020
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Nurse's RoleStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Screening
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Model description
- Health screening was done to the experimental group with one group. Surveys were conducted. Later, health education was given to this group. Six months later, the same group was screened for health again and a questionnaire was applied.
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 400 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- KTO Karatay University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Berna Dr Bayır, 1, Principal investigator, KTO Karatay University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04690712
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- KaratayBB
- Status last verified
- Dec 2020
- First submitted
- 8 Dec 2020
- Last updated
- 31 Dec 2020
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 31 Dec 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Effect of Health Education Provided to Primary School Students on Screening Results
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04690712
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- KaratayBB
- Conditions
- Nurse's Role, Health Behavior
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 400 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- KTO Karatay UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 7 May 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 25 Oct 2019 (actual)
- Study completion
- 21 Feb 2020 (actual)
- First posted
- 31 Dec 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study was conducted in a primary school in turkey.It was aimed to examine the effects of health education given to children in primary school period.As a result, it has been seen that education can be effective.
Detailed description
Investigation of the Effects of Health Education Provided to Saraçoğlu Toki Mustafa Çetin Primary School Students on Health Screening Results The aim of this study is to find the effect of health education given to primary school students on health screening results.
The research is a pre-test and post-test quasi-experimental model with a single subject group. Saracoglu Toki Mustafa Cetin Primary School is that located in Turkey; It was held between September 2019 and March 2020. It was aimed to reach the entire universe, not choosing the sample. The pre-test screening was completed with 460 students and the post-test screening with 400 students. An Introductory Information Form and Screening Test Application Form were used to collect data. After the health education was given by the researchers using visual, auditory materials and drama technique, the results were evaluated.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Screening
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- Double blind (investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 3
- Model description
- Health screening was done to the experimental group with one group. Surveys were conducted. Later, health education was given to this group. Six months later, the same group was screened for health again and a questionnaire was applied.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Socio-Demographic Characteristics of Students | No intervention | –When the socio-demographic characteristics of the students are examined according to the pre-test findings; It was seen that 27% were in the first grade, 20.9% in the second grade, and 25.7% in the third grade. When the age groups were evaluated, it was determined that 47.8% were in the 7-8 age group, 51.5% were in the 9-10 age group and 50% of them were female students and 50% were male students. It was observed that 27.6% of the students had a bad income and 59.3% had a medium level of income. When the father's education status was questioned, it was determined that 17.6% of them did not finish primary school, 55.4% of them were primary school graduates, 2.6% of them were high school graduates. On the other hand, 55% of their mothers did not complete primary school, 43.5% were primary school graduates and 1.5% were secondary school graduates |
| Comparison of Students' Pretest and Posttest Development Screening Average | Experimental | Behavioral: Health EducationAccording to the results of height and weight screening at the pre-test stage; the average height of the students is 127.0 ± 9.11; It was determined that the average weight was 26.1 ± 6.19, the average height was 130.61 ± 8.83 and the average weight was 29.92 ± 6.39 in the final test stage. A significant difference was found between pre-test and post-test screening results |
| Comparison of Pre-Test and Post-Test Screening Results of Students | Experimental | Behavioral: Health EducationIn the statistical evaluation, it was found that there was no significant difference between pre-test and post-test screening results |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 7 to 12 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- All students who regularly attend school at Saraçoğlu TOKI Primary School and who had no communication problems and whose parents gave their research approval were included in the study.
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Students who could not attend school were excluded from the study.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Health EducationAll students who attended the school were provided training by the researchers to improve oral and dental health and general hygiene. These trainings were made using slide shows and various entertaining materials. In addition, education was transformed into a drama with a theater show, and the importance of hand washing, hair and toilet hygiene was explained. In addition to hygiene, students were given training on correct eating patterns for a day so that they could develop healthy. | Behavioural | Comparison of Pre-Test and Post-Test Screening Results of Students, Comparison of Students' Pretest and Posttest Development Screening Average |
Primary outcome
Screening Tests Application Form
Time frame: 6 months
This form developed by the researchers by scanning the literature; It consists of a total of six screening phases including height, weight, oral hygiene, scalp hygiene / lice-dandruff and snellen / vision tests. It was used by the researchers to determine the results of the scan by selecting "yes", "no" options.
Introductory Information Form
Time frame: 1 week
While collecting the data, an Introductory Information Form developed by the researchers, consisting of eight questions including questions such as class, age, gender, family income, father's education level, mother's education status, father's occupation and mother's occupation, was used.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 31 Dec 2020.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Nurse's Role
Not yet recruiting
The Effect of Creative Drama on the Therapeutic Communication Skills and Empathy Levels of Pediatric Nursing Students: A Randomized Controlled Study
Nurse's Role, Empathy
Active, not recruiting
Advancing Nursing Practices in Hospital Oncology Care
Gastrointestinal Cancer, Gastrointestinal Disease
RecruitingPhase 1
Two Different Therapeutic Interventions Applied During Blood Sampling in Children
Blood Sampling, Child, Only
Recruiting
Single Lumen Midline Catheter vs Ultrasound Guided Peripheral IV as Performed by Bedside Emergency Department Registered Nurses
Difficult Vein Access, Emergency Department Patients
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Research-patientS and Clinical researcH Nurses: Exploring Their Experiences of tAking paRt in Clinical resEarch in the NHS
Experiences, Lived Experiences
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Berna Dr Bayır, 1 principal investigator
KTO Karatay University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Health Education in people with Nurse's Role and Health Behavior, run by KTO Karatay University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 31 Dec 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Screening Tests Application Form (time frame: 6 months). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 31 Dec 2020.