AzTrials
AzTrials

Ulcerative ColitisPhase 1NCT04691232

Autologous Ex Vivo Expanded Regulatory T Cells in Ulcerative Colitis

A Phase 1 study testing Regulatory T cells in people with Ulcerative Colitis and Autoimmune Diseases, run by University of Erlangen-Nürnberg Medical School at 1 site in Germany.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Together with Crohn's disease (CD), ulcerative colitis (UC) is one of the major forms of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD).Currently, no curative therapy is available, since the pathophysiology of this disease is incompletely understood (1-3) and clinical practice demonstrates that current therapies induce remission… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 18 years
Conditions the study is for
Ulcerative Colitis, Autoimmune Diseases
What is being tested?
Regulatory T cells
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
11 participants
Where
1 siteGermany
Study dates
22 Feb 2021to 22 May 2023
Phase
Phase 1
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 18 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients must have an established diagnosis of UC, with minimum time from diagnosis of ≥3 months
  • Patients must be either in remission under the allowed concomitant therapy or must have received all the beneficial pharmacological treatment lines before enrollment and have moderate to severe disease activity (disease should extend 15 cm or more above the anal verge) determined by a modified Mayo score (excluding the friability at grade 1 for the endoscopic sub score) of 6 to 12 with an endoscopic subscore ≥ 2 and no other individual subscore < 1.
  • Patients must have a WHO performance status of 0, 1 or 2 and must be in stable medical condition.
  • Patients must be between 18 and 75 years old and must be able and willing to give informed consent.
  • Women of child-bearing age must have a negative pregnancy test at enrollment in the study, must be willing to undergo monthly pregnancy tests until at least 3 months after adoptive Treg transfer and must oblige to use effective contraception until at least 3 months after adoptive Treg transfer. A highly effective method of birth control is defined as one that results in a low failure rate (ie, less than 1 percent per year) when used consistently and correctly, such as implants, injectables, combined oral contraceptives, some intrauterine devices (IUDs), sexual abstinence, or a vasectomized partner. For subjects using a hormonal contraceptive method, information regarding the product under evaluation and its potential effect on the contraceptive should be addressed.
  • Male study patients, who are partners of women of child-bearing age must be willing to use effective contraception until at least 3 months after adoptive Treg transfer. A highly effective method of birth control is defined as one that results in a low failure rate (ie, less than 1 percent per year) when used consistently and correctly, such as sexual abstinence, or a vasectomy. The solely use of condoms is not considered as an effective method of birth control. Therefore, partners of child-bearing age from male study patients should be willing to use implants, injectables, combined oral contraceptives or intrauterine devices (IUDs) a highly effective method of birth control. Information regarding the product under evaluation and its potential effect on the contraceptive should be addressed.
Show all 10Show fewer
  • Patients must be willing to undergo a leukapheresis.
  • Patients must be willing to get hospitalized for at least 24 hours following adoptive Treg transfer, and to cooperate for the whole period of the trial.
  • Accomplishment of a washout phase for biological therapy of at least 8 weeks or no detectable serum trough levels prior to screening in case of a washout phase less than 8 weeks.
  • Concomitant therapy with oral corticosteroids (prednisone or equivalent up to 20 mg/day, stable for 2 weeks at inclusion), budesonide (9 mg/day, stable for 8 weeks at inclusion), 5-ASA (stable for 2 weeks at inclusion) and azathioprine (stable for 8 weeks, initiated at least 3 months ago) is permitted. Concomitant oral corticosteroids can be reduced at the investigator's discretion from visit 5 onwards (e.g. 5 mg reduction per week).≤

Who cannot join

  • Any of the above mentioned inclusion criteria are not met.
  • Impaired hematological function (on repeated testing) as indicated by Leukocyte Count ≤ 2,500 /mm3, or Neutrophils ≤ 1,000 / mm3, or Lymphocytes ≤ 700 / mm3, or Platelets ≤ 75,000 / mm3, or Hemoglobin ≤ 9 g / dl22
  • Impaired hepatic or renal function as indicated by Serum creatinine ≥ 2.5 mg/100 ml, or Serum Bilirubin ≥ 2.0 mg/100 ml
  • Any other major serious illness [e.g. active systemic infections, immunodeficiency disease, clinically significant heart disease, respiratory disease, bleeding disorders, etc.] or a contraindication to leukapheresis.
  • Evidence for HIV-1, HIV -2, HTLV-1, TPHA, HBV, or HCV infection.
  • Patients who have spent a cumulative period of 1 year or more in the UK between the beginning of 1980 and the end of 1996
Show all 17Show fewer
  • Patients who have a family history, which places them at risk of developing Creutzfeldt-Jacob disease
  • Patients who have received a corneal or dura mater graft, or who have been treated in the past with medicines made from human pituitary glands
  • Other active autoimmune diseases (such as but not limited to Lupus erythematosus, autoimmune thyroiditis or uveitis, multiple sclerosis).
  • Previous splenectomy or radiation therapy to the spleen.
  • Patients with organ allografts.
  • Patients with celiac disease.
  • Concomitant treatment with chemotherapy, immunotherapy, any investigational drug and paramedical substances.
  • Existence or prior history of a malignant neoplasm.
  • Organic brain syndrome or significant psychiatric abnormality which would preclude participation in the full protocol and follow up.
  • Positive pregnancy test / Pregnancy or lactation. If pregnancy occurs during the course of the trial to female patients, the patient has to be excluded (not valid for partners of male patients treated).
  • Known hypersensitivities to human serum albumin and/or DMSO

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Germany1 site
  • University of Erlangen-Nürnberg Medical School

    Erlangen, Bavaria, 91054

Other trials in Germany

About this study

Official title: Phase I, Open-label, Fast-track Dose-escalation Clinical Trial Exploring the Safety and the Tolerability of Autologous ex Vivo Expanded Regulatory T Cells in Adults With Ulcerative Colitis

Together with Crohn's disease (CD), ulcerative colitis (UC) is one of the major forms of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD).Currently, no curative therapy is available, since the pathophysiology of this disease is incompletely understood (1-3) and clinical practice demonstrates that current therapies induce remission in subgroups of patients only. Scientific evidence suggests that colitogenic immune responses can be controlled by increasing the number of circulating regulatory T cells (Treg) (4). The production of large numbers of autologous Treg is possible by isolation of CD25+ cells from the whole blood of a patient and subsequent ex vivo expansion in the presence of the immunomodulatory drug rapamycin, Interleukin-2 (IL-2) and CD3/CD28 expander beads (5).

ER-TREG 01 is a single-center, open-label, fast-track phase I dose-escalation study designed to assess the safety profile and maximal tolerated dose (MTD) of a single infusion of ex vivo expanded autologous Treg in patients with active ulcerative colitis.

Read the detailed description

While the primary cause of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) development remains unknown, it is widely accepted that the initial events culminate in persistent immune responses with infiltration of immune cells and tissue destruction in the gut. Immune cell populations present within the inflamed bowel wall of IBD patients have been extensively characterized and studied (1;6). Studies focusing on T cells have demonstrated that the mucosa of Crohn's disease (CD) patients is dominated by Th1 cells, while in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) T helper cells with an atypical Th2 profile, which excessively produce IL-5 and IL-13 but not IL-4, are abundant (7). Furthermore, Th17 cells can be identified in the inflamed lamina propria and these cells are thought to play an important role in the pathophysiology of IBD, although the pathogenic mechanisms of these cells are not yet fully understood (8;9). Treg are also present within the lamina propria and these cells control the effector T cell populations mentioned above. They can be generated through the interaction of local T cells with CD103 expressing dendritic cells and intestinal epithelial cells, respectively (10;11). Moreover, the expression of integrins on the Treg surface (e.g. α4β7) facilitates mucosal migration through their interaction with specific ligands (e.g. MAdCAM1). As such, homing and local expansion of Treg cells create a local Treg pool that is essential for self-tolerance and the support of gut homeostasis (12). In addition, Treg cells are shown to suppress proinflammatory intestinal immune responses in colitis and colitis-associated cancer (13-16) and they are thought to augment intestinal Th17 responses (17). As previous studies have demonstrated insufficient expansion of mucosal Treg cells in IBD patients in comparison to the massive local expansion of effector T cells, it is likely that the relatively low number of Treg cells in IBD patients explains why these cells fail to control excessive immune responses (18).

Experimental colitis studies in mice have demonstrated that colitogenic immune responses can be controlled by increasing the number of mucosal Treg cells and highlight the potential of Treg-based cell therapy in IBD (19). Specifically, co-transfer of naïve CD4+ T cells with Treg both prevents chronic colitis and ameliorates established colitis in severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID) mice (20). Moreover, CD4+ T cells expanded ex vivo in the presence of rapamycin prevent the development of colitis in a naïve CD4+ T cell model in SCID mice. Importantly, the systemic administration of rapamycin alone only partially prevented the development of colonic Inflammation (20). In addition, the adoptive transfer of nTreg cells as well as the adoptive transfer of ex vivo transforming growth factor (TGF)-β-induced Treg (iTreg) suppressed colitis activity in vivo in mouse models (13;15;21). Collectively, these data suggest that Treg cells could be used for therapy of intestinal inflammation in IBD (22).

To allow an adoptive transfer of large numbers of Treg, CD25+ Treg cells are isolated from an autologous leukapheresis product and in vitro expanded during 21 days in the presence of the additives Interleukin-2 (IL-2), rapamycin and anti-CD3/anti-CD28 expander beads. After 21 days of expansion, anti-CD3/anti-CD28 expander beads are removed from the Treg drug product. Next, Treg are frozen in aliquots of 10 Million Treg/mL until further use (5).

Twelve patients, including 10% patient loss, resulting in at least ten treated and fully evaluable patients, will be enrolled in this single-center, open-label, fast-track dose-escalation study. Autologous ex vivo expanded CD4+CD25+CD127-/lo Treg cells will be adoptively transferred in patients with ulcerative colitis with active disease or stable disease under the allowed concomintant therapy at the time of enrollment. The maximal tolerated dose (MTD) is defined as the dose that does not produce more than one dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) among a total of four treated patients at the particular dose level.

The first enrolled patient will receive the initial starting dose of 0.5 x10e6 Treg/kg bodyweight. Adoptive transfer is escalated to the next dose level (1 x 10e6 Treg/kg, 2 x 10e6 Treg/kg, 5 x 10e6/Treg/kg and 10 x 10e6 Treg/kg bodyweight), in a next patient, if no DLT occurs. Consecutive patients will be treated at least four weeks apart to monitor acute severe adverse advents. If a DLT is noted, three additional patients will receive the same dose level. Dose-escalation continues until at least two patients among a cohort of four patients experience a DLT. If two patients among a cohort of four patients experience a DLT, dose de-escalation to the highest previously tolerated dose-level will follow. Three additional patients will receive the highest previously tolerated dose. If a DLT is noted in at least two patients at the tested dose-level, dose de-escalation will continue until less than two patients have experienced a DLT. After successful enrollment at the highest dose-level, five additional patients will be enrolled at the highest dose level to extend safety assessment. If no DLTs or less than two DLTs are experienced at all dose-levels tested, the MTD is not reached. In this case, a maximal administered dose (MAD) is defined.

Being tested
Regulatory T cells
Keywords
Ulcerative colitis, Regulatory T cells, Adoptive cell therapy
Medical subject headings
Colitis, Ulcerative, Autoimmune Diseases

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Regulatory T cellsBiological

    Autologous, ex vivo expanded, regulatory T cells

Study groups in NCT04691232
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Regulatory T cellsExperimentalIntravenous infusion of a single dose of 0.5x10e6, 1x10e6, 2x10e6, 5x10e6 or 10x10e6 Treg/kg body weight
Receives: Biological: Regulatory T cells

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Dose-finding

    To define the maximum tolerable dose (MTD) of one single infusion of autologous ex vivo expanded regulatory T cells in patients with ulcerative colitis

    Measured: Visit 5 (4 weeks after adoptive Treg transfer)

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. Assessment of safety of one single Infusion of regulatory T cells

    To define the number of patients with treatment-related adverse events as assessed by CTCAE v. 5.0

    Measured: Visit 5 (4 weeks after adoptive Treg transfer)

  2. Assessment of inflammation in the gut

    To define the impact on the course of UC as defined by an increase in the Mayo Clinic score of at least 3 points and an increase of at least 30% from baseline, with an accompanying increase in rectal bleeding subscore of at least 1 point.

    Measured: Visit 5 (4 weeks after adoptive Treg transfer)

  3. Assessment of quality of life

    To define changes in disease activity score calculated by the evaluation of the Quality of Life Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ)

    Measured: Visit 5 (4 weeks after adoptive Treg transfer)

  4. Assessment of Treg function in peripheral blood

    To define changes in Treg frequency in peripheral blood

    Measured: Visit 5 (4 weeks after adoptive Treg transfer)

  5. Assessment of Treg function in the gut

    To define changes in effector T cell and Treg frequencies in the gut

    Measured: Visit 5 (4 weeks after adoptive Treg transfer)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted31 Dec 2020
  2. Study start22 Feb 2021
  3. Primary completion12 Apr 2023
  4. Study completion22 May 2023

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 1
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
11 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04691232
Sponsor's protocol ID
ER-TREG 01
Status last verified
Jan 2022
First submitted
7 Dec 2020
Last updated
17 Oct 2023
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Abraham C, Cho JH. Inflammatory bowel disease. N Engl J Med. 2009 Nov 19;361(21):2066-78. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra0804647. No abstract available.

    PubMed 19923578
  • Corridoni D, Arseneau KO, Cominelli F. Inflammatory bowel disease. Immunol Lett. 2014 Oct;161(2):231-5. doi: 10.1016/j.imlet.2014.04.004. Epub 2014 Jun 2.

    PubMed 24938525
  • Danese S, Fiocchi C. Ulcerative colitis. N Engl J Med. 2011 Nov 3;365(18):1713-25. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1102942. No abstract available.

    PubMed 22047562
  • Mayne CG, Williams CB. Induced and natural regulatory T cells in the development of inflammatory bowel disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2013 Jul;19(8):1772-88. doi: 10.1097/MIB.0b013e318281f5a3.

    PubMed 23656897
  • Wiesinger M, Stoica D, Roessner S, Lorenz C, Fischer A, Atreya R, Neufert CF, Atreya I, Scheffold A, Schuler-Thurner B, Neurath MF, Schuler G, Voskens CJ. Good Manufacturing Practice-Compliant Production and Lot-Release of Ex Vivo Expanded Regulatory T Cells As Basis for Treatment of Patients with Autoimmune and Inflammatory Disorders. Front Immunol. 2017 Oct 26;8:1371. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2017.01371. eCollection 2017.

    PubMed 29123521
  • Geremia A, Biancheri P, Allan P, Corazza GR, Di Sabatino A. Innate and adaptive immunity in inflammatory bowel disease. Autoimmun Rev. 2014 Jan;13(1):3-10. doi: 10.1016/j.autrev.2013.06.004. Epub 2013 Jun 15.

    PubMed 23774107
  • Neurath MF. Cytokines in inflammatory bowel disease. Nat Rev Immunol. 2014 May;14(5):329-42. doi: 10.1038/nri3661. Epub 2014 Apr 22.

    PubMed 24751956
  • Iboshi Y, Nakamura K, Fukaura K, Iwasa T, Ogino H, Sumida Y, Ihara E, Akiho H, Harada N, Nakamuta M. Increased IL-17A/IL-17F expression ratio represents the key mucosal T helper/regulatory cell-related gene signature paralleling disease activity in ulcerative colitis. J Gastroenterol. 2017 Mar;52(3):315-326. doi: 10.1007/s00535-016-1221-1. Epub 2016 May 13.

    PubMed 27178567
  • Sujino T, Kanai T, Ono Y, Mikami Y, Hayashi A, Doi T, Matsuoka K, Hisamatsu T, Takaishi H, Ogata H, Yoshimura A, Littman DR, Hibi T. Regulatory T cells suppress development of colitis, blocking differentiation of T-helper 17 into alternative T-helper 1 cells. Gastroenterology. 2011 Sep;141(3):1014-23. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2011.05.052. Epub 2011 Jun 7.

    PubMed 21699791
  • Siddiqui KR, Powrie F. CD103+ GALT DCs promote Foxp3+ regulatory T cells. Mucosal Immunol. 2008 Nov;1 Suppl 1:S34-8. doi: 10.1038/mi.2008.43.

    PubMed 19079226
  • Westendorf AM, Fleissner D, Groebe L, Jung S, Gruber AD, Hansen W, Buer J. CD4+Foxp3+ regulatory T cell expansion induced by antigen-driven interaction with intestinal epithelial cells independent of local dendritic cells. Gut. 2009 Feb;58(2):211-9. doi: 10.1136/gut.2008.151720. Epub 2008 Oct 2.

    PubMed 18832523
  • Hadis U, Wahl B, Schulz O, Hardtke-Wolenski M, Schippers A, Wagner N, Muller W, Sparwasser T, Forster R, Pabst O. Intestinal tolerance requires gut homing and expansion of FoxP3+ regulatory T cells in the lamina propria. Immunity. 2011 Feb 25;34(2):237-46. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2011.01.016. Epub 2011 Feb 17.

    PubMed 21333554
  • Coombes JL, Maloy KJ. Control of intestinal homeostasis by regulatory T cells and dendritic cells. Semin Immunol. 2007 Apr;19(2):116-26. doi: 10.1016/j.smim.2007.01.001. Epub 2007 Feb 21.

    PubMed 17320411
  • Coombes JL, Siddiqui KR, Arancibia-Carcamo CV, Hall J, Sun CM, Belkaid Y, Powrie F. A functionally specialized population of mucosal CD103+ DCs induces Foxp3+ regulatory T cells via a TGF-beta and retinoic acid-dependent mechanism. J Exp Med. 2007 Aug 6;204(8):1757-64. doi: 10.1084/jem.20070590. Epub 2007 Jul 9.

    PubMed 17620361
  • Griseri T, Asquith M, Thompson C, Powrie F. OX40 is required for regulatory T cell-mediated control of colitis. J Exp Med. 2010 Apr 12;207(4):699-709. doi: 10.1084/jem.20091618. Epub 2010 Apr 5.

    PubMed 20368580

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 1 study testing Regulatory T cells in people with Ulcerative Colitis and Autoimmune Diseases, run by University of Erlangen-Nürnberg Medical School at 1 site in Germany.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 10 inclusion and 17 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Oct 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Germany. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 1 studies test a treatment in a small group of people for the first time or in a new way, mainly to check safety and find the right dose.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Dose-finding (time frame: Visit 5 (4 weeks after adoptive Treg transfer)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04691232, which also lists 24 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Oct 2023.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in