AzTrials
AzTrials

Uterine Cervical NeoplasmsQMBCHECCNCT04691453

QM-B and QM-C Hysterectomy for Early Cervical Cancer

A study testing QM-C Hysterectomy and QM-B Hysterectomy in people with Uterine Cervical Neoplasms, run by Southern Medical University, China at 1 site in China.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The goal of this clinical research study is to compare the long-term outcomes and safety of Querleu-Morrow-B(QM-B) and Querleu-Morrow-C(QM-C) hysterectomy for early cervical cancer. In this study, the surgical approach for QM-B and QM-C hysterectomy will be abdominal. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 65 years, women only
Conditions the study is for
Uterine Cervical Neoplasms
What is being tested?
QM-C Hysterectomy and QM-B Hysterectomy
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
538 participants
Where
1 siteChina
Study dates
1 Jan 2021to 1 Jan 2025
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 65 years
  • Women only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients who have signed an approved Informed Consent
  • 18.5≤BMI<28
  • Histologically confirmed primary adenocarcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma or adenosquamous carcinoma of the uterine cervix;
  • Patients with Histologically confirmed stage IA1 (with lymph vascular invasion), stage IA2, stage IB1, stage IB2, or stage IIA1 disease(FIGO 2018).
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group(ECOG) Performance Status of 0 or 1.
  • Patients undergoing the Non-Fertility-Sparing surgery.
  • Patients undergoing abdominal surgery.

Who cannot join

  • The life expectancy of the patient is less than 6 months.
  • Patients with serious medical diseases.
  • Patients with contraindications to surgery or anesthesia.
  • Preoperative imaging studies suggest metastasis to pelvic lymph nodes or para-aortic lymph nodes.
  • Patient asks to preserve fertility.
  • The patient requested direct radiation therapy.
  • Patients with adjuvant radiotherapy or chemotherapy before surgery.
  • Patients judged by the investigator to be unsuitable to participate in this trial.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Chunlin Chen, Doctor contact

008613725263051

jieru@163.com

China1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, No. 1838, Guangzhou Avenue, Guangzhou 510515

    Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510515

    Chunlin Chen, Doctor, 8602062787562, jieru@163.com

    Recruiting

Other trials in China

About this study

Official title: Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing the Oncology Outcome and Safety of QM-B and QM-C Hysterectomy for Early Cervical Cancer

The goal of this clinical research study is to compare the long-term outcomes and safety of Querleu-Morrow-B(QM-B) and Querleu-Morrow-C(QM-C) hysterectomy for early cervical cancer. In this study, the surgical approach for QM-B and QM-C hysterectomy will be abdominal.

Read the detailed description

Primary Objective:

To compare 5-year overall survival and 5-year disease-free survival amongst patients who undergo a QM-B hysterectomy versus those who undergo a QM-C hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer.

Secondary Objectives:

Compare operation time between arms. Compare blood loss between arms. Compare blood transfusion between arms. Compare intraoperative complications between arms. Compare postoperative complications between arms. Compare quality of lifes between arms.

Being tested
QM-C Hysterectomy, QM-B Hysterectomy
Keywords
Cervical cancer, QM-B, QM-C, Oncology outcome, Safety, Hysterectomy, Radical Hysterectomy, Abdominal
Medical subject headings
Uterine Cervical Neoplasms

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • QM-C HysterectomyProcedure or surgery

    Also called Type III radical hysterectomy, Radical hysterectomy, Type C radical hysterectomy

    This operation corresponds to the classical radical hysterectomy. The lateral border is defined as the medial aspect of the internal iliac artery and vein. Transection of the rectovaginal and rectouterine ligaments is performed at the rectum. Transection of the ventral parametrium ligament is performed at the bladder. Both the vesicouterine and vesicovaginal ligaments are resected. The ureter is completely mobilized and lateralized. The length of the vaginal cuff is adjusted to the vaginal extent of the tumor.

  • QM-B HysterectomyProcedure or surgery

    Also called Type II radical hysterectomy, Modified radical hysterectomy, Type B radical hysterectomy

    Type B is the modified radical hysterectomy. The ureter is unroofed and mobilized laterally, permitting transection of the paracervix at the level of the ureteral tunnel. Partial resection of the uterosacral peritoneal fold of the rectouterine ligament (dorsal parametrium) and the vesicouterine (ventral parametrium) ligament also is a standard component of this resection. Approximately 10 mm of the vagina from the caudal edge of the cervix or tumor is resected, without intent to radically resect the paravaginal tissues.

Study groups in NCT04691453
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
QM-C HysterectomyActive comparatorQM-C Hysterectomy
Receives: Procedure: QM-C Hysterectomy
QM-B HysterectomyExperimentalQM-B Hysterectomy
Receives: Procedure: QM-B Hysterectomy

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Rate of overall survival

    Compare treatment equivalence

    Measured: 5 years from surgery

  2. Rate of disease-free survival

    Compare treatment equivalence

    Measured: 5 years from surgery

Secondary outcomes (8)
  1. Operation time

    Compare operation time between groups by timer

    Measured: Intra-operatively

  2. Volume of blood loss

    Compare blood loss between groups by assessment

    Measured: Intra-operatively

  3. Rate of blood transfusion

    Compare rate of blood transfusion between groups

    Measured: Intra-operatively

  4. Rate of intraoperative complications

    Compare intraoperative complications between groups

    Measured: Intra-operatively

  5. Rate of postoperative complications

    Compare postoperative complications between groups

    Measured: 6 months from surgery

  6. Quality of life Questionnaires

    Compare quality of lifes between groups by questionnaire: EORTC CX24. EORTC CX24 for symptom experience, body imageand sexual/vaginal functioning. The scores of EORTC CX24 range from 0 to 100; a higher score represents a higher ("better") level of functioning, or a higher ("worse") level of symptoms.

    Measured: 6 months from surgery

  7. Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory Questionnaire

    Compare PFDI between groups by questionnaire PFDI-20. The calculation of the total scores of PFDI-20 range from 0 to 300; the higher the score the greater the perceived impact that pelvic floor dysfuntion has on a patient's life.

    Measured: 5 years from surgery

  8. Costs

    Compare costs between groups

    Measured: 6 months from surgery

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted31 Dec 2020
  2. Study start1 Jan 2021 (estimated)
  3. Primary completion1 Jan 2025 (estimated)
  4. Study completion1 Jan 2025 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
538 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04691453
Sponsor's protocol ID
NFEC-2020-175
Acronym
QMBCHECC
Status last verified
Dec 2020
First submitted
20 Oct 2020
Last updated
31 Dec 2020
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing QM-C Hysterectomy and QM-B Hysterectomy in people with Uterine Cervical Neoplasms, run by Southern Medical University, China at 1 site in China.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 31 Dec 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Chunlin Chen, Doctor (008613725263051, jieru@163.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Rate of overall survival (time frame: 5 years from surgery). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 31 Dec 2020.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in