AzTrials
AzTrials

DementiaNCT04693611

Prefrontal Cortex Dynamics of the Elderly During a Cognitive Stimulation Programme

A study testing Individual cognitive stimulation therapy (iCST) and Functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) in people with Dementia and Neurocognitive Disorders, run by CEDIARA - Assoc. Solidariedade Social de Ribeira de Fráguas at 1 site in Portugal.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This research aims to evaluate the effect of cognitive stimulation (CS) on the functioning of the prefrontal cortex (PFC), seeking an analysis of both cerebral hemodynamics in neuroplasticity and aspects related to the initiation of neurodegenerative processes. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 65 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
What is being tested?
Individual cognitive stimulation therapy (iCST) and Functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS)
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
36 participants
Where
1 sitePortugal
Study dates
14 Apr 2021to 31 Aug 2021
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 65 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Being 65 years of age or older.
  • Being able to communicate and understand.
  • Being a native Portuguese speaker.
  • Educational level equal to or higher than 4 years old.
  • Have given informed consent for the project, duly completed and signed, after prior information.
  • Have a score of 22 or more points in the MMSE.

Who cannot join

  • Suffering from an acute or severe illness that prevent participation in the intervention sessions.
  • Severe sensory and physical limitations that prevent participation.
  • Low level of consciousness and minimal attention span.
  • Presence of severe neuropsychiatric symptoms (such as agitation, psychosis, severe depressive and anxiety symptoms, apathy), or presence of uncontrolled delirium that would prevent participation in the sessions.
  • History of seizures or cerebrovascular disease.
  • Movement disorders diagnosis.
  • Psychoactive substances consumption.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Portugal1 site
  • Cediara - Social Solidarity Association of Ribeira de Fráguas

    Ribeira de Fráguas, Albergaria-a-Velha, 3850-705

Other trials in Portugal

About this study

Official title: Prefrontal Cortex Dynamics of the Elderly During a Cognitive Stimulation Programme: A Randomized and Controlled Trial in Old Adults With Normal Cognition and Mild Cognitive Impairment

This research aims to evaluate the effect of cognitive stimulation (CS) on the functioning of the prefrontal cortex (PFC), seeking an analysis of both cerebral hemodynamics in neuroplasticity and aspects related to the initiation of neurodegenerative processes. The intervention presents an individual format and the participants are elderly without or with neurocognitive disorders (NCD). Concretely, to assess the effects of individual CS on global cognition, and mood, as well as to analyze neuronal activity with oxygenation, volume and blood flow in the brain, evaluating the impact of cognitive stimulation on brain hemodynamics. Participants in the intervention group receive two 45 min-session of CS per week for 12 weeks in addition to their treatment as usual. Participants in the control group will maintain their treatment as usual.

Read the detailed description

Faced with an unprecedented global ageing population and the current COVID-19 pandemic, the risk of social vulnerability increases in the elderly population, promoting the development and aggravation of neurodegenerative diseases, in particular NCD. The diagnostic criteria for this pathology emphasizes cognitive changes, and as such is based clinically on cognitive decline.

The PFC is considered the centre of cognitive function, where it encompasses attention, memory and executive functions.

Attention is the cognitive function that allows us to orient to the relevant stimuli and process them to respond accordingly. Given its functionality, it is distinguished into three types of attention: selective, divided and sustained. Attentional dysfunction can be present in several conditions where cognitive deficit is the main symptom, such as Alzheimer's disease.

With regard to memory, it is subdivided according to time storage, i.e. short or long term. Short-term memory is capable of operating with certain perceived information for a limited space of time and can later be forgotten or transferred to long-term memory. Two other complementary components are distinguished in this type of memory: immediate memory and recent memory. Long-term memory is a latent memory with unlimited capacity that can remain outside the conscious circuit until circumstances require another mode of response. It involves separate, interdependent and dynamic processes of storage, consolidation and evocation. It is made up of two major subsystems: implicit or non-declarative memory, and explicit or declarative memory.

Regarding executive functions, they designate the cognitive processes of control and integration aimed at the execution of behaviour directed at complex objectives, requiring sub-components such as attention, programming, time sequencing, inhibition of competing processes and information, monitoring and selection of strategies. Executive functions include various processes such as working memory, planning, response to reactions and error corrections, cognitive flexibility, inhibition, decision making.

There is evidence that in the early stages of NCD, people are able to learn and improve their cognitive function through interventions such as CS. CS is recommended by the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence as a non-pharmacological therapy for people with mild to moderate NCD and is an intervention where the cognitive domains are not used in isolation but integrated. An individual format is associated with better results. In a systematic review on CS, studies have shown strong evidence that CS has a positive impact on cognitive function, depression, daily life activities and behaviour for people with NCD.

However, no studies are known that have analyzed prefrontal cortex activity in the elderly population associated with a functional method of infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS). This method provides information on hemodynamic changes associated with cortical activation by measuring in a non-invasive way changes in the relative ratios of deoxygenated hemoglobin (HHb) and oxygenated hemoglobin (HbO2).

Monitoring and recording the dynamics in the PFC of the elderly during a cognitive stimulation programme with the fNIRS method may contribute to expanding knowledge about aspects related to neurodegenerative processes and cognitive function in the elderly.

Being tested
Individual cognitive stimulation therapy (iCST), Functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS)
Keywords
brain activity, mood, functional near-infrared spectroscopy, prefrontal cortex, older adults, cognitive stimulation
Medical subject headings
Dementia, Neurocognitive Disorders, Cognitive Dysfunction

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Individual cognitive stimulation therapy (iCST)Behavioural

    The intervention group will receive 24 individual CS sessions per participant. Each session will last approximately 45 minutes and will have the following structure: session introduction (5 minutes); reality orientation (10 minutes); stimulation of cognitive domain (25 minutes); session closure (5 minutes). The sessions will be led by a previously trained therapist. The intervention program will include several activities based on the principles of CS and adjusted for participants without any neurocognitive disorder.

  • Functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS)Procedure or surgery

    The acquisition by fNIRS will be performed in each CS session in four regions of interest (ROIs) in the prefrontal cortex: left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (LDLPFC); left medial prefrontal cortex (LMPFC); right medial prefrontal cortex (RMPFC); right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (RDLPFC).

Study groups in NCT04693611
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Intervention GroupExperimentalParticipants who meet the inclusion criteria will be randomised to the CS intervention group or to the control group that will maintain their usual treatment. Participants in the intervention group will participate in two CS sessions per 12 weeks besides their treatment as usual.
Receives: Behavioral: Individual cognitive stimulation therapy (iCST); Procedure: Functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS)
Control GroupNo interventionParticipants in the control group will maintain their usual treatment: social interaction activities, stimulation of personal skills, and any prescribed dementia-specific medication.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Cognitive functioning evaluated through Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE)

    Significant statistic improvement in the participant's test scores between pre-intervention assessment and postintervention assessment. MMSE is a brief cognitive screening test. Scores range between 0-30 points. Higher scores indicate better cognitive function.

    Measured: baseline

  2. Change in cognitive functioning evaluated through MMSE

    Significant statistic improvement in the participant's test scores between pre-intervention assessment and postintervention assessment. MMSE is a brief cognitive screening test. Scores range between 0-30 points. Higher scores indicate better cognitive function.

    Measured: 12 weeks after the beginning of the intervention

  3. Executive functions evaluated through Frontal Assessment Battery (FAB)

    Significant statistic improvement in the participant's test scores between pre-intervention assessment and postintervention assessment. FAB assesses executive functions such as abstract thinking, mental flexibility, motor programming, interference sensibility, inhibitory control and environmental independence. Scores range between 0 - 18 points. Higher scores indicate better cognitive function.

    Measured: baseline

  4. Change in executive functions evaluated through FAB

    Significant statistic improvement in the participant's test scores between pre-intervention assessment and postintervention assessment. FAB assesses executive functions such as abstract thinking, mental flexibility, motor programming, interference sensibility, inhibitory control and environmental independence. Scores range between 0 - 18 points. Higher scores indicate better cognitive function.

    Measured: 12 weeks after the beginning of the intervention

  5. Prefrontal cortex activation pattern through a fNIRS

    Analysis of Oxyhemoglobin (HbO2) and Deoxyhemoglobin (HHb) variation in four regions of interest (ROIs) in the PFC: left prefrontal dorsolateral cortex (LDLPFC); left medial prefrontal cortex (LMPFC); right medial prefrontal cortex (RMPFC); right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (RDLPFC). An increase in brain activity is generally assumed to reflect an increase in HbO2 and decrease in HHb as based on a mechanism known as neurovascular coupling.

    Measured: baseline

  6. Change in prefrontal cortex activation pattern through a fNIRS

    Analysis of Oxyhemoglobin (HbO2) and Deoxyhemoglobin (HHb) variation in four regions of interest (ROIs) in the PFC: left prefrontal dorsolateral cortex (LDLPFC); left medial prefrontal cortex (LMPFC); right medial prefrontal cortex (RMPFC); right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (RDLPFC). An increase in brain activity is generally assumed to reflect an increase in HbO2 and decrease in HHb as based on a mechanism known as neurovascular coupling.

    Measured: during the intervention

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Depressive symptomatology assessed through the Geriatric Depression Scale-15 (GDS-15)

    Participants' scores in the GDS-15. This instrument evaluated depressive symptoms using yes/no answers. Scores range between 0 and 15 points. Higher scores indicate more severe depressive symptoms.

    Measured: baseline

  2. Change in depressive symptomatology assessed through the GDS-15

    Participants' scores in the GDS-15. This instrument evaluated depressive symptoms using yes/no answers. Scores range between 0 and 15 points. Higher scores indicate more severe depressive symptoms.

    Measured: 12 weeks after the beginning of the intervention

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted5 Jan 2021
  2. Study start14 Apr 2021
  3. Primary completion30 Apr 2021
  4. Study completion31 Aug 2021

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
36 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04693611
Sponsor's protocol ID
16122020
Status last verified
Feb 2021
First submitted
29 Dec 2020
Last updated
1 Sep 2021
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Apóstolo JLA, Bobrowicz-Campos EM, dos Reis IAC, Henriques SJ, Correia CAV. Exploring the screening capacity of the European Portuguese version of the 15-item Geriatric Depression Scale. Revista de Psicopatología y Psicología Clínica. 2018; 23: 99-107. doi: 10.5944/rppc.vol.23.num.2.2018.21050

  • Apóstolo J, Loureiro L, Reis I, Silva I, Cardoso D, Sfetcu R. Contribution to the adaptation of the Geriatric Depression Scale -15 into Portuguese. Revista de Enfermagem Referência. 2014; IV(3): 65-73. doi: 10.12707/RIV14033

  • Clare L, Woods RT. Cognitive training and cognitive rehabilitation for people with early-stage Alzheimer's disease: A review. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation. 2004; 14: 385-401. doi: 10.1080/09602010443000074

  • Clare L, Wilson BA, Carter G, Breen K, Gosses A, Hodges JR. Intervening with everyday memory problems in dementia of Alzheimer type: an errorless learning approach. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2000 Feb;22(1):132-46. doi: 10.1076/1380-3395(200002)22:1;1-8;FT132.

    PubMed 10649552
  • Davis RN, Massman PJ, Doody RS. Cognitive intervention in Alzheimer disease: a randomized placebo-controlled study. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 2001 Jan-Mar;15(1):1-9. doi: 10.1097/00002093-200101000-00001.

    PubMed 11236819
  • Dubois B, Slachevsky A, Litvan I, Pillon B. The FAB: a Frontal Assessment Battery at bedside. Neurology. 2000 Dec 12;55(11):1621-6. doi: 10.1212/wnl.55.11.1621.

    PubMed 11113214
  • Filipin F, Feldman M, Taragano FE, Martelli M, Sánchez V, García V, et al. The efficacy of cognitive stimulation on depression and cognition in elderly patients with cognitive impairment: A retrospective cohort study. AIMS Medical Science. 2015; 3(1): 1-14. doi: 10.3934/medsci.2016.1.1

  • Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. "Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res. 1975 Nov;12(3):189-98. doi: 10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6. No abstract available.

    PubMed 1202204
  • Freitas S, Simoes MR, Alves L, Santana I. The Relevance of Sociodemographic and Health Variables on MMSE Normative Data. Appl Neuropsychol Adult. 2015;22(4):311-9. doi: 10.1080/23279095.2014.926455. Epub 2014 Dec 22.

    PubMed 25531579
  • Guerreiro M, Silva AP, Botelho MA, Leitão O, Castro-Caldas A, Garcia C. Adaptação à população portuguesa da tradução do Mini Mental State Examination. Revista Portuguesa de Neurologia. 1994; 1: 9-10.

  • Justo-Henriques SI, Marques-Castro AE, Otero P, Vazquez FL, Torres AJ. [Long-term individual cognitive stimulation program in patients with mild neurocognitive disorder: a pilot study]. Rev Neurol. 2019 Apr 1;68(7):281-289. doi: 10.33588/rn.6807.2018321. Spanish.

    PubMed 30906977
  • Justo-Henriques SI, Otero P, Torres AJ, Vazquez FL. Effect of long-term individual cognitive stimulation intervention for people with mild neurocognitive disorder. Rev Neurol. 2021 Aug 15;73(4):121-129. doi: 10.33588/rn.7304.2021114. English, Spanish.

    PubMed 34308545
  • Lima CF, Meireles LP, Fonseca R, Castro SL, Garrett C. The Frontal Assessment Battery (FAB) in Parkinson's disease and correlations with formal measures of executive functioning. J Neurol. 2008 Nov;255(11):1756-61. doi: 10.1007/s00415-008-0024-6. Epub 2008 Sep 25.

    PubMed 18821046
  • Lobbia A, Carbone E, Faggian S, Gardini S, Piras F, Spector E, et al. The efficacy of cognitive stimulation therapy (CST) for people with mild-to-moderate dementia: A review. European Psychologist. 2018; 24(3): 257-277. doi: 10.1027/1016-9040/a000342

  • Loewenstein DA, Acevedo A, Czaja SJ, Duara R. Cognitive rehabilitation of mildly impaired Alzheimer disease patients on cholinesterase inhibitors. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2004 Jul-Aug;12(4):395-402. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajgp.12.4.395.

    PubMed 15249277

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Individual cognitive stimulation therapy (iCST) and Functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) in people with Dementia and Neurocognitive Disorders, run by CEDIARA - Assoc. Solidariedade Social de Ribeira de Fráguas at 1 site in Portugal.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Sep 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Portugal. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Cognitive functioning evaluated through Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) (time frame: baseline). The study lists 6 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04693611, which also lists 21 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Sep 2021.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in