AzTrials
AzTrials

AnalgesiaNCT04699422

Serratus Anterior Plane Block Versus Standard of Care After Totally Endoscopic Aortic Valve Replacement

A study testing Serratus anterior plane block and PCIA with Piritramide in people with Analgesia and Surgery, run by Jessa Hospital at 1 site in Belgium.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The aim of this study is to assess and compare the efficacy of a serratus anterior plane (SAP) block and our current pain protocol (Patient Controlled Intravenous Analgesia with opioids) in the prevention and treatment of acute postoperative pain after totally endoscopic aortic valve replacement (AVR) surgery. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Analgesia, Surgery, Cardiac Disease
What is being tested?
Serratus anterior plane block and PCIA with Piritramide
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
80 participants
Where
1 siteBelgium
Study dates
3 Dec 2020to 4 Jul 2022
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Scheduled for elective aortic valve replacement surgery via right anterolateral thoracotomy
  • Adult patients (minimally 18 years old)
  • EuroScore ii < 3%
  • Bodyweight > 50 kg

Who cannot join

  • Refusal to participate
  • Inability to communicate due to language or neurologic barriers
  • Inability to control and self-administer opioids with PCIA or to comprehend the NRS pain score due to confusion or learning difficulties
  • Chronic use of opioids
  • Chronic use of analgesic antidepressants and/or antiepileptics
  • History of major trauma or surgery to right chest wall
Show all 12Show fewer
  • History of chronic pain at right chest wall
  • Allergy to opioids and/or local anesthetics
  • Allergy to acetaminophen
  • Morbid obesity (BMI > 35)
  • Pregnancy
  • Peroperative events compromising early postoperative recovery (aortic dissection, systolic anterior motion of the mitral valve, cardiac tamponade, ..)

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Belgium1 site
  • Dr Bjorn Stessel

    Hasselt, 3500

Other trials in Belgium

About this study

Official title: Serratus Anterior Plane Block Versus Standard of Care After Totally Endoscopic Aortic Valve Replacement: a Double-blinded Randomized Controlled Trial.

The aim of this study is to assess and compare the efficacy of a serratus anterior plane (SAP) block and our current pain protocol (Patient Controlled Intravenous Analgesia with opioids) in the prevention and treatment of acute postoperative pain after totally endoscopic aortic valve replacement (AVR) surgery.

Read the detailed description

During the last two decades, cardiac surgical techniques changed dramatically. Evidence for good short and long-term outcome after endovascular and minimally invasive procedures is rising. The goal of avoiding sternotomy is earlier patient recovery without compromising safety. Therefore, enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols have been implemented to aim for early extubation and ambulation. Analgesic regimens after cardiac surgery did not change significant however. Opioids remain the cornerstone of analgesia in the postoperative cardiac surgical care units, despite known side effects as nausea, constipation and risk for addiction. Neuraxial anesthetic techniques after cardiac surgery have been studied and validated to reduce opioid consumption. Their implementation in clinical practice however remains limited for two reasons. First, heparinization is required for cardiac surgery, which increases the risk neuraxial hematoma after neuraxial anesthesia, leading to deleterious complications as paraplegia. Secondly, neuraxial anesthesia induces orthosympathicolysis, enhancing vasoplegia after cardiac surgery. However, fascial plane blocks in cardiac surgery since peripheral blocks do not induce sympathicolysis and consequences of chest wall hematoma are limited.

In 2013, Blanco described the serratus anterior plane (SAP) block as an analgesic option for chest wall surgery. In this fascial plane block, local anesthetics are injected in the plane beneath the anterior serratus muscle and in the plane between latissimus dorsi and serratus anterior in an ultrasound guided manner. SAP block provides analgesia in dermatomes T2-T9. Recently, successful analgesia after SAP block has been demonstrated for soft tissue chest wall surgery, thoracotomy and rib fractures. No major side effects were reported. More specifically, no sympatholytic effects or chest wall hematoma were observed. However, up to now no prospective studies assessing the analgesic efficacy of SAP block after cardiac surgery are published. Two retrospective studies show conflicting results. Berthoud et al. retrospectively compared SAP block to continuous wound infusion after different types of minimally invasive cardiac surgery (MICS) and found reduced morphine consumption as well as shorter intensive care and hospital length of stay after SAP block. In contrast, Moll et al. found no difference in opioid consumption between SAP block and no block in patients after robotic coronary artery bypass grafting (rCABG). The authors comment they only performed the deep component of the SAP block, and some surgical entry points were outside dermatomes T2-T7.

Totally endoscopic aortic valve replacement (AVR) is a novel minimally invasive cardiosurgical technique. Surgical incision is made anteriorly in intercostal space two on the right hemithorax. Since intercostal space two is innervated by dermatomes T2-T3, somatic analgesia can be obtained with SAP block. In addition with a favorable safety profile and a minimal/non-existent risk of evoking sympatholytic effects, a SAP block may be a suitable analgesic technique to prevent/minimize postoperative pain after totally endoscopic AVR surgery.

Being tested
Serratus anterior plane block, PCIA with Piritramide
Medical subject headings
Agnosia, Heart Diseases

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Serratus anterior plane blockProcedure or surgery

    The needle will be introduced in-plane from supero-anterior to postero-inferior until the needle tip is positioned in the plane underneath the serratus muscle (deep compartment). Under continuous ultrasound guidance,30 cc Bupivacaine 0.25% will be injected in the deep compartment. After the deep component of the SAP is completed, the needle will be withdrawn to the subcutaneous tissues. The needle will be flattened and advanced in-plane to the plane superficial to the serratus muscles. 10 cc Bupivacaine 0.25% will be injected superficial to the serratus muscles after correct placement of the needle tip is confirmed on ultrasound

  • PCIA with PiritramideDrug

    Also called PCIA with Dipidolor

    A patient controlled intravenous analgesia system (IVAC PCAM®, Cardinal Health or CADD pump) with piritramide (Dipidolor®, Janssen) using following settings: bolus 2 mg and lockout interval 15 min.

Study groups in NCT04699422
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Experimental groupActive comparatorPatients in the experimental group will receive the serratus anterior plane block combined with postoperative PCIA with Piritramide.
Receives: Procedure: Serratus anterior plane block; Drug: PCIA with Piritramide
Control groupSham comparatorPatients in the control group will receive postoperative PCIA with Piritramide.
Receives: Drug: PCIA with Piritramide

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Cumulative opioid consumption by patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA)

    Piritramide consumption (mg) will be directly read from the PCIA-system after 24 hours.

    Measured: 24 hours after performing the SAP block

Secondary outcomes (15)
  1. Opioid consumption during predetermined time intervals after surgery

    Piritramide consumption (mg) will be directly read from the PCIA-system at predetermined time intervals after performing the SAP block.

    Measured: Every 4 hours until 24 hours after placement of the SAP block

  2. Opioid free patients first 24 postoperative hours

    Number of patients that do not require any opioids within the first 24 hours after surgery.

    Measured: First 24 hours

  3. Opioid free patients during hospital length of stay

    Number of patients that do not require any opioids during the hospital length of stay

    Measured: Through study completion, an average of 7 days

  4. Postoperative pain score in rest

    The postoperative pain on the surgical site is evaluated based on an 11-points numeric scale (Numerical Rating Sale - NRS) where 0 = no pain and 10 = worst pain ever.

    Measured: 4, 8, 12, and 24 hours after performing the SAP block and at postoperative day 7.

  5. Quality of recovery after totally endoscopic aortic valve replacement

    Quality of recovery will be assessed via the 5-Dimensional European Quality of Life (EQ5D) and 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) questionnaires concerning mobility, self care, daily activities and pain.

    Measured: Postoperative days 2 and 7

  6. Overall patient satisfaction with analgesic therapy

    Overall patient satisfaction with analgesic therapy will be assessed with an 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (where 0 = not satisfied at all and 10 = extremely satisfied).

    Measured: 24 hours after performing the serratus anterior plane block at postoperative day 1

  7. Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV)

    The simplified postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) impact scale will be used to assess PONV. The scale ranges from 0 to 6, where 0 means no nausea/vomiting. Clinically important PONV will be defined as a score of 5 or more.

    Measured: 24 hours after performing the serratus anterior plane block at postoperative day 1

  8. Constipation

    Time to first defecation (postoperative days) or need for laxatives during hospital stay.

    Measured: Until postoperative day 7

  9. Time to extubation

    Time from arrival to the ICU until extubation in minutes.

    Measured: Throughout study completion, an average of 7 days

  10. ICU length of stay

    Time from arrival to the ICU until meeting discharge criteria to the ward in postoperative hours.

    Measured: Until postoperative day 7

  11. Hospital length of stay

    Time to discharge out of the hospital in postoperative days (day of surgery = day 0)

    Measured: Through study completion, an average of 7 days

  12. Pneumonia

    Defined as empirical antibiotic therapy for suspicion of pneumonia during hospital stay, in number of patients.

    Measured: Until postoperative day 7

  13. Duration of vasopressor infusion

    Time from arrival to the ICU until full weaning from vasoactive substances (eg norepinephrine) in minutes. Patients not requiring any vasopressors will be excluded from this secondary outcome parameter.

    Measured: Until postoperative day 7

  14. Subcutaneous emphysema

    Number of patients suffering subcutaneous emphysema. All patients will be investigated 24h after performing the SAP block (or control) by a blinded assessor.

    Measured: 24 hours after performing the serratus anterior plane block at postoperative day 7

  15. Number of patients with new onset perioperative atrial fibrillation (POAF)

    Number of patients suffering witnessed (ECG recorded) POAF and patients with history of (paroxysmal) atrial fibrillation will not be taken into account for this secondary outcome parameter.

    Measured: Until postoperative day 7

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted7 Jan 2021
  2. Study start3 Dec 2020
  3. Primary completion4 Jul 2022
  4. Study completion4 Jul 2022

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
This trial is designed as a mono-center, double-blinded, prospective, randomized controlled superiority trial comparing 2 groups of patients
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
80 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04699422
Sponsor's protocol ID
JessaH_SAPblock
Status last verified
Dec 2022
First submitted
30 Nov 2020
Last updated
21 Dec 2022
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Vandenbrande J, Jamaer B, Stessel B, van Hilst E, Callebaut I, Yilmaz A, Packle L, Sermeus L, Blanco R, Jalil H. Serratus plane block versus standard of care for pain control after totally endoscopic aortic valve replacement: a double-blind, randomized controlled, superiority trial. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2024 Jun 3;49(6):429-435. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2023-104439.

    PubMed 37597856

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Serratus anterior plane block and PCIA with Piritramide in people with Analgesia and Surgery, run by Jessa Hospital at 1 site in Belgium.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 12 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Dec 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Belgium. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Cumulative opioid consumption by patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) (time frame: 24 hours after performing the SAP block). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04699422, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Dec 2022.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in