AzTrials
AzTrials

Alcohol Use, UnspecifiedNCT04699955

Longitudinal Use of Protective Behavioral Strategies

A study testing Deviance Regulation Theory in people with Alcohol Use, Unspecified, run by University of Central Florida at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study tested a deviance regulation theory intervention in a sample of university freshman. The aims were to (a) increase use of protective behavioral strategies, (b) decrease alcohol use, and (c) decrease alcohol-related consequences. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 21 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Alcohol Use, Unspecified
What is being tested?
Deviance Regulation Theory
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
157 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
14 Aug 2017to 13 Aug 2019
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 21 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • College freshman at UCF
  • Endorse alcohol consumption in the past two weeks

Who cannot join

  • Severe mental illness
  • Under 18 years of age
  • Over 21 years of age
  • Unable to speak English fluently

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • The University of central Florida

    Orlando, Florida, 32816-0001

Other trials in United States

About this study

This study tested a deviance regulation theory intervention in a sample of university freshman. The aims were to (a) increase use of protective behavioral strategies, (b) decrease alcohol use, and (c) decrease alcohol-related consequences.

Read the detailed description

College student freshmen were invited to participate in a study on the use of alcohol protective behavioral strategies. They were randomly assigned to receive a positive message about individuals that used protective strategies, a negative message about individuals that did not use protective strategies, or an assessment control. They were then followed for the next 12 months. Assessments were completed at weeks 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 12, 26, and 52.

Being tested
Deviance Regulation Theory
Keywords
Deviance Regulation Theory, Alcohol Use, Alcohol Consequences, Protective Behavioral Strategies, College Freshman
Medical subject headings
Alcohol Drinking

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Deviance Regulation TheoryBehavioural

    In the negative message condition, participants received information on the negative aspects of individuals that did not used protective strategies and were encouraged to report why these individuals were viewed so much more negatively. In the positive message condition, participants received information on the positive aspects of individuals that used protective strategies and were encouraged to report why these individuals were viewed so much more positively.

Study groups in NCT04699955
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Assessment only ControlNo interventionParticipants received no intervention content. They provided assessments of past week protective strategy use, alcohol use, and alcohol problems. All assessments were delivered via an online survey.
Positive Message ConditionExperimentalParticipants received information on the positive aspects of individuals that used protective strategies and were encouraged to report why these individuals were viewed so much more positively. They provided assessments of past week protective strategy use, alcohol use, and alcohol problems. All assessments and messaging was delivered via an online survey.
Receives: Behavioral: Deviance Regulation Theory
Negative Message ConditionExperimentalParticipants received information on the negative aspects of individuals that did not used protective strategies and were encouraged to report why these individuals were viewed so much more negatively. They provided assessments of past week protective strategy use, alcohol use, and alcohol problems. All assessments and messaging was delivered via an online survey.
Receives: Behavioral: Deviance Regulation Theory

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Protective Behavioral Strategies- Pre-Intervention

    Protective behavioral strategies (PBS) are a collection of harm-reduction strategies aimed to decrease alcohol-related consequences when consuming alcohol. The are three broad subtypes of PBS: (1) Manner of Drinking (MD; e.g., avoiding mixing different types of alcohol), (2) Stopping/Limiting Drinking (SLD; e.g., stopping drinking at a predetermined time), and (3) Serious Harm Reduction (SHR; e.g., knowing where your drink is at all times).

    These PBS were assessed in this study using Protective Behavioral Strategies Survey-20 (PBS-20). The PBS-20 consists of 20 statements covering three factors of protective strategies: Manner of Drinking, Stopping/Limiting Drinking, and Serious Harm Reduction. The frequency of PBS use was be reported on a five-point Likert-scale from 'Never' to 'Always'. Participants were asked to record their PBS use from the past three months.

    Measured: Past three months prior to intervention/study

  2. Protective Behavioral Strategies- Initial intervention (Week 1)

    Protective behavioral strategies (PBS) are a collection of harm-reduction strategies aimed to decrease alcohol-related consequences when consuming alcohol. The are three broad subtypes of PBS: (1) Manner of Drinking (MD; e.g., avoiding mixing different types of alcohol), (2) Stopping/Limiting Drinking (SLD; e.g., stopping drinking at a predetermined time), and (3) Serious Harm Reduction (SHR; e.g., knowing where your drink is at all times).

    These PBS were assessed in this study using Protective Behavioral Strategies Survey-20 (PBS-20). The PBS-20 consists of 20 statements covering three factors of protective strategies: Manner of Drinking, Stopping/Limiting Drinking, and Serious Harm Reduction. The frequency of PBS use was be reported on a five-point Likert-scale from 'Never' to 'Always'. Participants were asked to record their PBS use from the past week.

    Measured: Past week before intervention

  3. Protective Behavioral Strategies- Week 2

    Protective behavioral strategies (PBS) are a collection of harm-reduction strategies aimed to decrease alcohol-related consequences when consuming alcohol. The are three broad subtypes of PBS: (1) Manner of Drinking (MD; e.g., avoiding mixing different types of alcohol), (2) Stopping/Limiting Drinking (SLD; e.g., stopping drinking at a predetermined time), and (3) Serious Harm Reduction (SHR; e.g., knowing where your drink is at all times).

    These PBS were assessed in this study using Protective Behavioral Strategies Survey-20 (PBS-20). The PBS-20 consists of 20 statements covering three factors of protective strategies: Manner of Drinking, Stopping/Limiting Drinking, and Serious Harm Reduction. The frequency of PBS use was be reported on a five-point Likert-scale from 'Never' to 'Always'. Participants were asked to record their PBS use from the past week.

    Measured: Past 1 week measured- 1 week post intervention

  4. Protective Behavioral Strategies- Week 3

    Protective behavioral strategies (PBS) are a collection of harm-reduction strategies aimed to decrease alcohol-related consequences when consuming alcohol. The are three broad subtypes of PBS: (1) Manner of Drinking (MD; e.g., avoiding mixing different types of alcohol), (2) Stopping/Limiting Drinking (SLD; e.g., stopping drinking at a predetermined time), and (3) Serious Harm Reduction (SHR; e.g., knowing where your drink is at all times).

    These PBS were assessed in this study using Protective Behavioral Strategies Survey-20 (PBS-20). The PBS-20 consists of 20 statements covering three factors of protective strategies: Manner of Drinking, Stopping/Limiting Drinking, and Serious Harm Reduction. The frequency of PBS use was be reported on a five-point Likert-scale from 'Never' to 'Always'. Participants were asked to record their PBS use from the past week.

    Measured: Past 1 week measured-2 weeks post intervention

  5. Protective Behavioral Strategies- Week 4

    Protective behavioral strategies (PBS) are a collection of harm-reduction strategies aimed to decrease alcohol-related consequences when consuming alcohol. The are three broad subtypes of PBS: (1) Manner of Drinking (MD; e.g., avoiding mixing different types of alcohol), (2) Stopping/Limiting Drinking (SLD; e.g., stopping drinking at a predetermined time), and (3) Serious Harm Reduction (SHR; e.g., knowing where your drink is at all times).

    These PBS were assessed in this study using Protective Behavioral Strategies Survey-20 (PBS-20). The PBS-20 consists of 20 statements covering three factors of protective strategies: Manner of Drinking, Stopping/Limiting Drinking, and Serious Harm Reduction. The frequency of PBS use was be reported on a five-point Likert-scale from 'Never' to 'Always'. Participants were asked to record their PBS use from the past week.

    Measured: Past 1 week measured-3 weeks post intervention

  6. Protective Behavioral Strategies- Week 5

    Protective behavioral strategies (PBS) are a collection of harm-reduction strategies aimed to decrease alcohol-related consequences when consuming alcohol. The are three broad subtypes of PBS: (1) Manner of Drinking (MD; e.g., avoiding mixing different types of alcohol), (2) Stopping/Limiting Drinking (SLD; e.g., stopping drinking at a predetermined time), and (3) Serious Harm Reduction (SHR; e.g., knowing where your drink is at all times).

    These PBS were assessed in this study using Protective Behavioral Strategies Survey-20 (PBS-20). The PBS-20 consists of 20 statements covering three factors of protective strategies: Manner of Drinking, Stopping/Limiting Drinking, and Serious Harm Reduction. The frequency of PBS use was be reported on a five-point Likert-scale from 'Never' to 'Always'. Participants were asked to record their PBS use from the past week.

    Measured: Past 1 week measured-4 weeks post intervention

  7. Protective Behavioral Strategies- Week 6

    Protective behavioral strategies (PBS) are a collection of harm-reduction strategies aimed to decrease alcohol-related consequences when consuming alcohol. The are three broad subtypes of PBS: (1) Manner of Drinking (MD; e.g., avoiding mixing different types of alcohol), (2) Stopping/Limiting Drinking (SLD; e.g., stopping drinking at a predetermined time), and (3) Serious Harm Reduction (SHR; e.g., knowing where your drink is at all times).

    These PBS were assessed in this study using Protective Behavioral Strategies Survey-20 (PBS-20). The PBS-20 consists of 20 statements covering three factors of protective strategies: Manner of Drinking, Stopping/Limiting Drinking, and Serious Harm Reduction. The frequency of PBS use was be reported on a five-point Likert-scale from 'Never' to 'Always'. Participants were asked to record their PBS use from the past week.

    Measured: Past 1 week measured-5 weeks post intervention

  8. Protective Behavioral Strategies- 3 month follow up

    Protective behavioral strategies (PBS) are a collection of harm-reduction strategies aimed to decrease alcohol-related consequences when consuming alcohol. The are three broad subtypes of PBS: (1) Manner of Drinking (MD; e.g., avoiding mixing different types of alcohol), (2) Stopping/Limiting Drinking (SLD; e.g., stopping drinking at a predetermined time), and (3) Serious Harm Reduction (SHR; e.g., knowing where your drink is at all times).

    These PBS were assessed in this study using Protective Behavioral Strategies Survey-20 (PBS-20). The PBS-20 consists of 20 statements covering three factors of protective strategies: Manner of Drinking, Stopping/Limiting Drinking, and Serious Harm Reduction. The frequency of PBS use was be reported on a five-point Likert-scale from 'Never' to 'Always'. Participants were asked to record their PBS use from the past three months.

    Measured: Past 3 months measured- 12 week post intervention

  9. Protective Behavioral Strategies- 6 month follow-up

    Protective behavioral strategies (PBS) are a collection of harm-reduction strategies aimed to decrease alcohol-related consequences when consuming alcohol. The are three broad subtypes of PBS: (1) Manner of Drinking (MD; e.g., avoiding mixing different types of alcohol), (2) Stopping/Limiting Drinking (SLD; e.g., stopping drinking at a predetermined time), and (3) Serious Harm Reduction (SHR; e.g., knowing where your drink is at all times).

    These PBS were assessed in this study using Protective Behavioral Strategies Survey-20 (PBS-20). The PBS-20 consists of 20 statements covering three factors of protective strategies: Manner of Drinking, Stopping/Limiting Drinking, and Serious Harm Reduction. The frequency of PBS use was be reported on a five-point Likert-scale from 'Never' to 'Always'. Participants were asked to record their PBS use from the past three months.

    Measured: Past 3 months measured- 26 weeks post intervention

  10. Protective Behavioral Strategies- 12 month follow-up

    Protective behavioral strategies (PBS) are a collection of harm-reduction strategies aimed to decrease alcohol-related consequences when consuming alcohol. The are three broad subtypes of PBS: (1) Manner of Drinking (MD; e.g., avoiding mixing different types of alcohol), (2) Stopping/Limiting Drinking (SLD; e.g., stopping drinking at a predetermined time), and (3) Serious Harm Reduction (SHR; e.g., knowing where your drink is at all times).

    These PBS were assessed in this study using Protective Behavioral Strategies Survey-20 (PBS-20). The PBS-20 consists of 20 statements covering three factors of protective strategies: Manner of Drinking, Stopping/Limiting Drinking, and Serious Harm Reduction. The frequency of PBS use was be reported on a five-point Likert-scale from 'Never' to 'Always'. Participants were asked to record their PBS use from the past three months.

    Measured: Past 3 months measured- 52 weeks post intervention

Secondary outcomes (20)
  1. Alcohol-related consequences- Pre-intervention

    Alcohol-related consequences was assessed using the Young Adult Alcohol Consequences Questionnaire (YAACQ), which consists of 48 items assessing eight categories of alcohol-related consequences: Social-Interpersonal, Impaired Control, Self-Perception, Self-Care, Risk Behaviors, Academic/Occupational, Physical Dependence, and Blackout Drinking. Participants recorded alcohol consequences (Yes/No/ I do not wish to respond) from the past three months.

    Measured: Past three months prior to intervention/study

  2. Alcohol-related consequences- Initial intervention (Week 1)

    Alcohol-related consequences was assessed using the Young Adult Alcohol Consequences Questionnaire (YAACQ), which consists of 48 items assessing eight categories of alcohol-related consequences: Social-Interpersonal, Impaired Control, Self-Perception, Self-Care, Risk Behaviors, Academic/Occupational, Physical Dependence, and Blackout Drinking. Participants recorded alcohol consequences (Yes/No/ I do not wish to respond) from the past week.

    Measured: Past week before intervention

  3. Alcohol-related consequences- Week 2

    Alcohol-related consequences was assessed using the Young Adult Alcohol Consequences Questionnaire (YAACQ), which consists of 48 items assessing eight categories of alcohol-related consequences: Social-Interpersonal, Impaired Control, Self-Perception, Self-Care, Risk Behaviors, Academic/Occupational, Physical Dependence, and Blackout Drinking. Participants recorded alcohol consequences (Yes/No/ I do not wish to respond) from the past week.

    Measured: Past 1 week measured- 1 week post intervention

  4. Alcohol-related consequences- Week 3

    Alcohol-related consequences was assessed using the Young Adult Alcohol Consequences Questionnaire (YAACQ), which consists of 48 items assessing eight categories of alcohol-related consequences: Social-Interpersonal, Impaired Control, Self-Perception, Self-Care, Risk Behaviors, Academic/Occupational, Physical Dependence, and Blackout Drinking. Participants recorded alcohol consequences (Yes/No/ I do not wish to respond) from the past week.

    Measured: Past 1 week measured- 2 week post intervention

  5. Alcohol-related consequences- Week 4

    Alcohol-related consequences was assessed using the Young Adult Alcohol Consequences Questionnaire (YAACQ), which consists of 48 items assessing eight categories of alcohol-related consequences: Social-Interpersonal, Impaired Control, Self-Perception, Self-Care, Risk Behaviors, Academic/Occupational, Physical Dependence, and Blackout Drinking. Participants recorded alcohol consequences (Yes/No/ I do not wish to respond) from the past week.

    Measured: Past 1 week measured- 3 week post intervention

  6. Alcohol-related consequences- Week 5

    Alcohol-related consequences was assessed using the Young Adult Alcohol Consequences Questionnaire (YAACQ), which consists of 48 items assessing eight categories of alcohol-related consequences: Social-Interpersonal, Impaired Control, Self-Perception, Self-Care, Risk Behaviors, Academic/Occupational, Physical Dependence, and Blackout Drinking. Participants recorded alcohol consequences (Yes/No/ I do not wish to respond) from the past week.

    Measured: Past 1 week measured- 4 week post intervention

  7. Alcohol-related consequences- Week 6

    Alcohol-related consequences was assessed using the Young Adult Alcohol Consequences Questionnaire (YAACQ), which consists of 48 items assessing eight categories of alcohol-related consequences: Social-Interpersonal, Impaired Control, Self-Perception, Self-Care, Risk Behaviors, Academic/Occupational, Physical Dependence, and Blackout Drinking. Participants recorded alcohol consequences (Yes/No/ I do not wish to respond) from the past week.

    Measured: Past 1 week measured- 5 week post intervention

  8. Alcohol-related consequences- 3 month follow up

    Alcohol-related consequences was assessed using the Young Adult Alcohol Consequences Questionnaire (YAACQ), which consists of 48 items assessing eight categories of alcohol-related consequences: Social-Interpersonal, Impaired Control, Self-Perception, Self-Care, Risk Behaviors, Academic/Occupational, Physical Dependence, and Blackout Drinking. Participants recorded alcohol consequences (Yes/No/ I do not wish to respond) from the past three months.

    Measured: Past 3 months measured- 12 week post intervention

  9. Alcohol-related consequences- 6 month follow-up

    Alcohol-related consequences was assessed using the Young Adult Alcohol Consequences Questionnaire (YAACQ), which consists of 48 items assessing eight categories of alcohol-related consequences: Social-Interpersonal, Impaired Control, Self-Perception, Self-Care, Risk Behaviors, Academic/Occupational, Physical Dependence, and Blackout Drinking. Participants recorded alcohol consequences (Yes/No/ I do not wish to respond) from the past three months.

    Measured: Past 3 months measured- 26 weeks post intervention

  10. Alcohol-related consequences- 12 month follow-up

    Alcohol-related consequences was assessed using the Young Adult Alcohol Consequences Questionnaire (YAACQ), which consists of 48 items assessing eight categories of alcohol-related consequences: Social-Interpersonal, Impaired Control, Self-Perception, Self-Care, Risk Behaviors, Academic/Occupational, Physical Dependence, and Blackout Drinking. Participants recorded alcohol consequences (Yes/No/ I do not wish to respond) from the past three months.

    Measured: Past 3 months measured- 52 weeks post intervention

  11. Alcohol use- Pre-intervention

    Alcohol use (quantity) was assessed using the Modified Daily Drinking Questionnaire (DDQ-M). The DDQ-M was used to measure average alcohol consumption and time spent drinking during a typical week over the past three months. The DDQ-M is composed of a free-text grid where individuals report the number of drinks typically consumed for each day of the week for the past three months.

    Measured: Past three months prior to intervention/study

  12. Alcohol use- Initial intervention (Week 1)

    Alcohol use (quantity) was assessed using the Modified Daily Drinking Questionnaire (DDQ-M). The DDQ-M was used to measure the number of drinks consumed for each day of the past week. Each grid began with Monday and ended with Sunday, as surveys were sent out on Mondays.

    Measured: Past week before intervention

  13. Alcohol use- Week 2

    Alcohol use (quantity) was assessed using the Modified Daily Drinking Questionnaire (DDQ-M). The DDQ-M was used to measure the number of drinks consumed for each day of the past week. Each grid began with Monday and ended with Sunday, as surveys were sent out on Mondays.

    Measured: Past 1 week measured- 1 week post intervention

  14. Alcohol use- Week 3

    Alcohol use (quantity) was assessed using the Modified Daily Drinking Questionnaire (DDQ-M). The DDQ-M was used to measure the number of drinks consumed for each day of the past week. Each grid began with Monday and ended with Sunday, as surveys were sent out on Mondays.

    Measured: Past 1 week measured- 2 weeks post intervention

  15. Alcohol use- Week 4

    Alcohol use (quantity) was assessed using the Modified Daily Drinking Questionnaire (DDQ-M). The DDQ-M was used to measure the number of drinks consumed for each day of the past week. Each grid began with Monday and ended with Sunday, as surveys were sent out on Mondays.

    Measured: Past 1 week measured- 3 weeks post intervention

  16. Alcohol use- Week 5

    Alcohol use (quantity) was assessed using the Modified Daily Drinking Questionnaire (DDQ-M). The DDQ-M was used to measure the number of drinks consumed for each day of the past week. Each grid began with Monday and ended with Sunday, as surveys were sent out on Mondays.

    Measured: Past 1 week measured- 4 weeks post intervention

  17. Alcohol use- Week 6

    Alcohol use (quantity) was assessed using the Modified Daily Drinking Questionnaire (DDQ-M). The DDQ-M was used to measure the number of drinks consumed for each day of the past week. Each grid began with Monday and ended with Sunday, as surveys were sent out on Mondays.

    Measured: Past 1 week measured- 5 weeks post intervention

  18. Alcohol use- 3 month follow up

    Alcohol use (quantity) was assessed using the Modified Daily Drinking Questionnaire (DDQ-M). The DDQ-M was used to measure average alcohol consumption and time spent drinking during a typical week over the past three months. The DDQ-M is composed of a free-text grid where individuals report the number of drinks typically consumed for each day of the week for the past three months.

    Measured: Past 3 months measured- 12 week post intervention

  19. Alcohol use- 6 month follow up

    Alcohol use (quantity) was assessed using the Modified Daily Drinking Questionnaire (DDQ-M). The DDQ-M was used to measure average alcohol consumption and time spent drinking during a typical week over the past three months. The DDQ-M is composed of a free-text grid where individuals report the number of drinks typically consumed for each day of the week for the past three months.

    Measured: Past 3 months measured- 24 week post intervention

  20. Alcohol use- 12 month follow up

    Alcohol use (quantity) was assessed using the Modified Daily Drinking Questionnaire (DDQ-M). The DDQ-M was used to measure average alcohol consumption and time spent drinking during a typical week over the past three months. The DDQ-M is composed of a free-text grid where individuals report the number of drinks typically consumed for each day of the week for the past three months.

    Measured: Past 3 months measured- 52 week post intervention

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted7 Jan 2021
  2. Study start14 Aug 2017
  3. Primary completion13 Aug 2019
  4. Study completion13 Aug 2019

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Participants were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 parallel conditions. After assignment, they received a brief intervention and were then followed for the next 12 months.
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Participant
Enrolment
157 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04699955
Sponsor's protocol ID
SBE-17-13260
Status last verified
Jan 2021
First submitted
22 May 2020
Last updated
7 Jan 2021
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: De-identified data will be stored at the Open Science Framework

Publications

  • Leary AV, Dvorak RD, Troop-Gordon W, Blanton H, Peterson R, Kramer MP, De Leon AN, Magri T. Test of a deviance regulation theory intervention among first-year college student drinkers: Differential effects via frequency and quantity norms. Psychol Addict Behav. 2022 Sep;36(6):619-634. doi: 10.1037/adb0000777. Epub 2021 Sep 30.

    PubMed 34591518

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Deviance Regulation Theory in people with Alcohol Use, Unspecified, run by University of Central Florida at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 Jan 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Protective Behavioral Strategies- Pre-Intervention (time frame: Past three months prior to intervention/study). The study lists 10 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04699955, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 Jan 2021.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in