Moderate to Severe Ulcerative ColitisPhase 2NCT04700449
A Study Assessing the Efficacy and Safety of CBP-307 in Subjects With Moderate to Severe Ulcerative Colitis (UC)
A Phase 2 study testing Double-Blind 0.2mg CBP-307, Open-label CBP-307 and Double-Blind 0.1mg CBP-307 in people with Moderate to Severe Ulcerative Colitis, run by Connect Biopharm LLC at 66 sites in 4 countries.
Trial summary
This study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of CBP-307 in subjects with moderate to severe ulcerative colitis (UC). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Moderate to Severe Ulcerative Colitis
- What is being tested?
- Double-Blind 0.2mg CBP-307, Open-label CBP-307 and Double-Blind 0.1mg CBP-307
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 145 participants
- Where
- 66 sitesin 4 countries
- Study dates
- 27 Feb 2019to 10 Nov 2022
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Main inclusion and exclusion criteria for the study Stage 1:
Subjects were eligible to be included in the study only if all the following criteria applied:
- Male or female subjects aged 18 to 75 years (inclusive) with a diagnosis of UC established at least 3 months prior to screening by clinical and endoscopic evidence corroborated by a histopathology report;
- Confirmed to have moderately to severely active UC within 14 days prior to the first dose of the investigational product, based on an adapted Mayo score of 4 to 9, and an endoscopic subscore of ≥2;
- Had evidence of UC extending to the rectum with ≥15 cm involvement on endoscopy;
- UC patients who were receiving treatment. Subjects could be enrolled if they met any items below:
- Prior to the randomization visit, subjects had received oral 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) (e.g., mesalazine, sulfasalazine, olsalazine, balsalazide) for at least 4 weeks with the dose stable for at least 2 weeks;
- Prior to the randomization visit, subjects had received oral or intravenous (IV) corticosteroids e.g. prednisone (daily doses ≤30 mg), budesonide (daily doses ≤9 mg), methylprednisolone (daily doses ≤24 mg), or equivalent dose of corticosteroids for at least 4 weeks, with the dose stable for at least 2 weeks;
- Oral 5-ASA or corticosteroid for treatment of UC had been stopped for at least 2 weeks prior to the screening endoscopy examination which was used for Mayo score assessment;
- A stable dosing regimen had to be used if non-prohibited concomitant medications were used.
Subjects who met any of the following criteria were excluded:
- Subjects had evidence of toxic megacolon;
- Had subtotal or total colectomy;
- An existing ileostomy, colostomy, or known symptomatic stenosis of the intestine; a history or evidence of adenomatous colonic polyps that had not been removed; a history or evidence of colonic mucosal dysplasia including low or high grade of dysplasia, as well as indeterminate for dysplasia; a suspected or confirmed diagnosis of Crohn's enterocolitis, undiagnosed types of colitis, ischemic colitis, or radiation colitis;
- Previous exposure to lymphocyte-depleting therapies or D-penicillamine, leflunomide; prior exposure to approved or investigational products that inhibited the lymphocyte trafficking;
- Received immunosuppressants within 30 days prior to randomization; received any investigational biologic or non-biologic agent, or approved biologic agent or biosimilars within 60 days or 5 half lives prior to screening (whichever was longer);
- Known active infection during the screening period; treatment for Clostridioides difficile (C. difficile) infection or other intestinal pathogen with 28 days prior to first dose of investigational product; active or latent tuberculosis (TB); Chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection or chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection; any identified congenital or acquired immunodeficiency;
- Received any live vaccine within 30 days prior to screening.
Main Inclusion and exclusion criteria for subjects' entry into the study Stage 2 from Stage 1:
Subjects who met all the following criteria entered into the study Stage 2:
- subjects with UC who completed 12 weeks of treatment with CBP-307 or placebo in Stage 1 and completed all the assessments (including colonoscopy) at study visit of Week 12 in study Stage 1;
- Good compliance in Stage 1;
- Subjects or their legal representatives voluntarily signed the ICF for study Stage 2.
Subjects who met any of the following criteria were excluded from the study Stage 2:
- subjects had any unstable or uncontrolled cardiovascular, pulmonary, hepatic, renal, gastrointestinal, genitourinary, hematological, coagulation, immunological, endocrine/metabolic, or other medical disorder that, in the opinion of the investigator, were to confound the study results or compromise subject safety;
- Allergic to CBP 307 or its excipients, experience of significant adverse events related to the study drug during Stage 1, and not appropriate to participate in Stage 2 assessed by the investigator;
- Active or chronic recurrent infections;
- A history of uveitis or macular oedema.
Trial locations and contacts
66 sites in 4 countries.
66 sites in 4 countries
China39 sites
Connect Investigative Site 2008
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100050
Connect Investigative Site 2001
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100730
Connect Investigative Site 2013
Chengdu, Sichuan, 610041
Connect Investigative Site 2043
Chongqing, Sichuan, 400037
Connect Investigative Site 2025
Dalian, Liaoning, 116027
Connect Investigative Site 2006
Fuzhou, Fujian, 350001
Connect Investigative Site 2003
Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510120
Connect Investigative Site 2009
Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510655
Connect Investigative Site 2034
Haikou, Hainan, 570311
Connect Investigative Site 2047
Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310003
Connect Investigative Site 2032
Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310009
Connect Investigative Site 2018
Hefei, Anhui, 230001
Connect Investigative Site 2004
Hefei, Anhui, 230022
Connect Investigative Site 2015
Jilin City, Changchun, 130021
Connect Investigative Site 2028
Jinan, Shandong, 250012
Connect Investigative Site 2044
Jinan, Shandong
Connect Investigative Site 2046
Nanchang, Jiangxi, 330006
Connect Investigative Site 2027
Nanjing, Jiangsu, 210002
Connect Investigative Site 2031
Nanjing, Jiangsu, 210006
Connect Investigative Site 2023
Nanjing, Jiangsu, 210036
Connect Investigative Site 2030
Nanning, Guangxi, 168600
Connect Investigative Site 2024
Qingdao, Shandong, 266000
Connect Investigative Site 2011
Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, 200025
Connect Investigative Site 2007
Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, 200040
Connect Investigative Site 2019
Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, 200065
Connect Investigative Site 2035
Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, 200080
Connect Investigative Site 2038
Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, 200433
Connect Investigative Site 2040
Shenyang, Liaoning, 117004
Connect Investigative Site 2017
Shenzhen, Guangdong, 518035
Connect Investigative Site 2021
Shenzhen, Guangdong, 518053
Connect Investigative Site 2026
Shijiazhuang, Hebei, 050000
Connect Investigative Site 2041
Shijiazhuang, Hebei, 050011
Connect Investigative Site 2033
Suzhou, Jiangsu, 215004
Connect Investigative Site 2020
Taiyuan, Shanxi, 030001
Connect Investigative Site 2045
Wenzhou, Zhejiang, 325027
Connect Investigative Site 2016
Wuhan, Hubei, 430022
Connect Investigative Site 2005
Wuhan, Hubei, 430030
Connect Investigative Site 2012
Xiamen, Fujian, 361004
Connect Investigative Site 2022
Zhengzhou, Henan, 450052
United States14 sites
Connect Investigative Site 2307
Atlanta, Georgia, 30309
Connect Investigative Site 2315
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45219
Connect Investigative Site 2311
Cypress, Texas, 90212
Connect Investigative Site 2314
Hialeah, Florida, 33016
Connect Investigative Site 2309
Homestead, Florida, 33032
Connect Investigative Site 2320
Kissimmee, Florida, 34741
Connect Investigative Site 2318
Miami, Florida, 33126
Connect Investigative Site 2308
Mission Hills, California, 91345
Connect Investigative Site 2321
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73102
Connect Investigative Site 2302
Orlando, Florida, 32803
Connect Investigative Site 2304
Orlando, Florida, 32810
Connect Investigative Site 2306
Orlando, Florida, 32819
Connect Investigative Site 2316
Phoenix, Arizona, 85018
Connect Investigative Site 2319
San Antonio, Texas, 78229
Ukraine11 sites
Connect Investigative Site 2211
Dnipro, 49005
Connect Investigative Site 2217
Ivano-Frankivsk, 76018
Connect Investigative Site 2202
Kharkiv, 61037
Connect Investigative Site 2208
Kharkiv, 61124
Connect Investigative Site 2205
Kyiv, 1135
Connect Investigative Site 2220
Kyiv, 8173
Connect Investigative Site 2215
Lviv, 79005
Connect Investigative Site 2216
Lviv, 79010
Connect Investigative Site 2218
Uzhhorod, 88000
Connect Investigative Site 2209
Vinnytsia, 21021
Connect Investigative Site 2214
Zaporizhzhya, 69035
Pakistan2 sites
Connect Investigative Site 2151
Karachi, Sindh, 74800
Connect Investigative Site 2152
Karachi, Sindh, 75270
About this study
Official title: A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Phase II Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of CBP-307 in Subjects With Moderate to Severe Ulcerative Colitis (UC)
This study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of CBP-307 in subjects with moderate to severe ulcerative colitis (UC).
Read the detailed description
This is a multicenter, multicountry, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase II clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of CBP-307 in subjects with moderate to severe ulcerative colitis (UC). CBP-307 capsules are administered orally. This study includes stage 1 and stage 2.
Study Stage 1 After screening, subjects entered the randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled induction therapy for 12 weeks.
Subjects were screened at 1 to 21 days prior to the baseline visit. The eligible subjects were enrolled and randomized at the baseline visit. As per study protocol (version 5.0 or earlier), subjects received CBP 307 0.1 mg, CBP-307 0.2 mg, and placebo at a ratio of 1:1:1. The subjects enrolled under protocol (version 6.0) were randomized to CBP-307 0.2 mg and placebo at a ratio of 1:1 into the 2 groups (approximately 52 subjects in each group) and stratified according to whether the subject failed a previous tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α antagonist therapy. Subjects assigned were blinded to their treatment assignment (CBP-307 or placebo) in the 12-week double-blinded placebo-controlled treatment period.
Subjects randomized to CBP-307 group underwent dose titration for 1 week, while those in placebo group underwent simulated titration. Both CBP-307 and placebo were administered through the oral route. For subjects in the CBP-307 0.1 mg QD group, a daily dose of 0.05 mg CBP-307 was given from Day 1 to Day 4; then a daily dose of 0.1 mg CBP-307 was given for 3 days from Day 5 to Day 7; from Day 8, a daily target dose of 0.1 mg was administered. For subjects in the group of CBP-307 0.2 mg QD, a daily dose of 0.05 mg CBP-307 was given from Day 1 to Day 4; then, a dose of 0.1 mg CBP-307 was given daily for 3 days from Day 5 to Day 7; from Day 8, a daily target dose of 0.2 mg was administered.
For the subjects already enrolled as per study protocol version 5.0 or earlier, they continued the treatment in the Stage 1 according to the previous planned schedule.
Eligible subjects completing 12 weeks of induction therapy in Stage 1 were permitted to enter Stage 2 to be evaluated for the long-term maintenance administration of CBP-307. Subjects who withdrew early from the study or completed the Stage 1, but did not enter Stage 2, entered a 4-week safety follow-up period.
Study stage 2 All subjects who completed 12 weeks of induction therapy in the study Stage 1 and completed all examinations (including colonoscopy) at Week 12 (visit 11) could choose to enter the study Stage 2 of a total length of 40 weeks, including 36 weeks of continuous treatment and 4 weeks of safety follow up after the last dose. Subjects who chose to enter the Stage 2 signed an updated informed consent form (ICF) and screened for eligibility.
The study Stage 2 contained sub-study 1 and sub-study 2. Subjects entered 1 of sub-studies based on their results of efficacy evaluation in the study Stage 1.
Sub-study 1 (subjects who achieved clinical response by adapted Mayo score): Subjects who achieved clinical response at Week 12 in the study Stage 1 and met the eligibility criteria for Stage 2 entered sub study 1 of the study Stage 2 to receive double-blind maintenance treatment for 36 weeks (Week 13 to 48), i.e., the therapeutic regimen for them in Stage 1 was continually maintained. Safety follow-up was completed at 4 weeks after the last dose. Subjects who presented with recurrent UC during maintenance treatment were terminated from the treatment and withdrew from the study.
For the subjects already enrolled as per study protocol version 5.0 or earlier, they followed the previous planned treatment in the sub-study 1 of Stage 2 study.
Sub-study 2 (subjects who did not achieve clinical response by adapted Mayo score): Subjects who did not achieve clinical response at Week 12 in study Stage 1 and met the eligibility criteria for Stage 2 entered open-label treatment with CBP-307 0.2 mg. Subjects received CBP-307 QD at an oral dose of 0.2 mg in sub study 2 regardless of whether they received CBP-307 or placebo in the study Stage 1.
For subjects who entered sub-study 2 of study Stage 2, 1-week dose titration was performed at Week 13. Dose titration involved administration of CBP 0.05 mg for 4 consecutive days from Titration Day 1 to Day 4, followed by administration of CBP-307 0.1 mg for 3 days from Titration Day 5 to Day 7, and administration of CBP-307 at a target dose of 0.2 mg initiated on Titration Day 8. After dose titration was completed, subjects received oral treatment with CBP-307 0.2 mg QD, for 36 weeks. Safety follow-up was completed at 4 weeks after the last dose. If the subjects did not achieve clinical response by the efficacy evaluation including colonoscopy at Week 24, the treatment was to be discontinued and the subjects were to withdraw from the study.
- Conditions
- Moderate to Severe Ulcerative Colitis
- Being tested
- Double-Blind 0.2mg CBP-307, Double-Blind Placebo, Open-label CBP-307, Double-Blind 0.1mg CBP-307
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Double-Blind 0.2mg CBP-307Drug
0.2 mg capsule oral administration
Double-Blind PlaceboDrug
Placebo capsule oral administration
Open-label CBP-307Drug
0.2 mg capsule oral administration
Double-Blind 0.1mg CBP-307Drug
0.1 mg capsule oral administration
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Double-Blind 0.2mg CBP-307 | Experimental | 0.2 mg CBP-307 capsules oral administration. Receives: Drug: Double-Blind 0.2mg CBP-307 |
| Double-Blind Placebo | Placebo comparator | Placebo capsules oral administration. Receives: Drug: Double-Blind Placebo |
| Open-Label CBP-307 | Experimental | 0.2 mg CBP-307 capsules oral administration. Receives: Drug: Open-label CBP-307 |
| Double-Blind 0.1mg CBP-307 | Experimental | 0.1 mg CBP-307 capsules oral administration. Receives: Drug: Double-Blind 0.1mg CBP-307 |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change From Baseline for Adapted Mayo Score: 0.2 mg Versus Placebo
Change in adapted Mayo score from baseline at week 12 compared between CBP-307 0.2 mg and placebo in the Full Analysis Set by Multiple Imputation. Adapted Mayo scores were calculated based on data in stool frequency, rectal bleeding, and endoscopic findings. The Mayo scores range from 0 to 9 and consist of 3 subscores, each ranging from 0 to 3. The higher the score is, the more severe the disease is.
Measured: The adapted Mayo score was evaluated at screening and Week 12 (or early termination visit) during the study Stage 1 as well as at Week 24 (only for the sub-study 2) and Week 48 (or early termination visit) during the study Stage 2.
Secondary outcomes (10)
Change in Complete Mayo Score From Baseline
Change in complete Mayo score from baseline at week 12 after treatment. Complete Mayo scores were calculated based on data in stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopic findings, and physician's global assessment. The Mayo scores range from 0 to 12 and consist of 4 subscores, each ranging from 0 to 3. The higher the score is, the more severe the disease is.
Measured: at Week 12
Comparison of Clinical Response Rate by Adapted Mayo Score
Comparison of clinical response rate at week 12 by adapted Mayo score (defined as a decrease of ≥ 2 points and at least 30% from baseline, accompanied with a decrease of ≥ 1 point from baseline in the rectal bleeding subscore or an absolute rectal bleeding subscore of ≤ 1 point).
Measured: at Week 12
Comparison of Clinical Response Rate by Complete Mayo Score
Comparison of clinical response rate at week 12 by complete Mayo score (defined as a decrease of ≥ 3 points and at least 30% from baseline, accompanied with a decrease of ≥ 1 point from baseline in the rectal bleeding subscore or an absolute rectal bleeding subscore of ≤ 1 point).
Measured: at Week 12
Comparison of Clinical Remission Rate by Adapted Mayo Score
Comparison of clinical remission rate at week 12 by adapted Mayo score (defined as a rectal bleeding subscore = 0 and a stool frequency subscore ≤ 1, with an Endoscopy subscore ≤ 1 [excluding friability]).
Measured: at Week 12
Comparison of Clinical Remission Rate by Complete Mayo Score
Comparison of clinical remission rate at week 12 by complete Mayo score (defined as a total Mayo score of ≤ 2 points with no individual subscore > 1 point).
Measured: at Week 12
Mucosal Healing Rate
Mucosal healing rate at week 12 after treatment (mucosal healing is defined as Mayo endoscopic subscore ≤ 1)
Measured: at Week 12
Incidence, Type and Severity of Treatment Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE)
The safety and tolerability will be assessed on basis of incidence, type and severity of TEAEs as well as their relations with the investigational product .
Measured: for 12 consecutive weeks
Incidence, Type and Severity of Serious Adverse Event (SAE)
The safety and tolerability will be assessed on basis of incidence, type and severity of SAEs as well as their relations with the investigational product and SAEs that lead to discontinuation of study.
Measured: for 12 consecutive weeks
Incidence, Type and Severity of Adverse Events (AE)
The safety and tolerability will be assessed on basis of AEs that lead to discontinuation of study, and AEs of special interest (cardiac events as well as pulmonary function tests, ophthalmologic examinations, skin examinations, and nervous system physical examinations)
Measured: for 12 consecutive weeks
Change From Baseline in Adapted Mayo Score: 0.1 mg Versus Placebo
Change from baseline in adapted Mayo score at Week 12 between CBP-307 0.1 mg and placebo in the Full Analysis Set by Multiple Imputation. Adapted Mayo scores were calculated based on data in stool frequency, rectal bleeding, and endoscopic findings. The Mayo scores range from 0 to 9 and consist of 3 subscores, each ranging from 0 to 3. The higher the score is, the more severe the disease is.
Measured: at Week 12
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted7 Jan 2021
- Study start27 Feb 2019
- Primary completion23 Feb 2022
- Study completion10 Nov 2022
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Moderate to Severe Ulcerative ColitisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 145 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Connect Biopharm LLC
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Suzhou Connect, Study director, Connect Biopharm LLC
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04700449
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CBP-307CN002
- Status last verified
- Apr 2024
- First submitted
- 22 Oct 2020
- Last updated
- 6 May 2024
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 6 May 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Phase II Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of CBP-307 in Subjects With Moderate to Severe Ulcerative Colitis (UC)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04700449
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CBP-307CN002
- Conditions
- Moderate to Severe Ulcerative Colitis
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 145 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Connect Biopharm LLCIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 27 Feb 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 23 Feb 2022 (actual)
- Study completion
- 10 Nov 2022 (actual)
- First posted
- 7 Jan 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 2 Nov 2023
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of CBP-307 in subjects with moderate to severe ulcerative colitis (UC).
Detailed description
This is a multicenter, multicountry, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase II clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of CBP-307 in subjects with moderate to severe ulcerative colitis (UC). CBP-307 capsules are administered orally. This study includes stage 1 and stage 2.
Study Stage 1 After screening, subjects entered the randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled induction therapy for 12 weeks.
Subjects were screened at 1 to 21 days prior to the baseline visit. The eligible subjects were enrolled and randomized at the baseline visit. As per study protocol (version 5.0 or earlier), subjects received CBP 307 0.1 mg, CBP-307 0.2 mg, and placebo at a ratio of 1:1:1. The subjects enrolled under protocol (version 6.0) were randomized to CBP-307 0.2 mg and placebo at a ratio of 1:1 into the 2 groups (approximately 52 subjects in each group) and stratified according to whether the subject failed a previous tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α antagonist therapy. Subjects assigned were blinded to their treatment assignment (CBP-307 or placebo) in the 12-week double-blinded placebo-controlled treatment period.
Subjects randomized to CBP-307 group underwent dose titration for 1 week, while those in placebo group underwent simulated titration. Both CBP-307 and placebo were administered through the oral route. For subjects in the CBP-307 0.1 mg QD group, a daily dose of 0.05 mg CBP-307 was given from Day 1 to Day 4; then a daily dose of 0.1 mg CBP-307 was given for 3 days from Day 5 to Day 7; from Day 8, a daily target dose of 0.1 mg was administered. For subjects in the group of CBP-307 0.2 mg QD, a daily dose of 0.05 mg CBP-307 was given from Day 1 to Day 4; then, a dose of 0.1 mg CBP-307 was given daily for 3 days from Day 5 to Day 7; from Day 8, a daily target dose of 0.2 mg was administered.
For the subjects already enrolled as per study protocol version 5.0 or earlier, they continued the treatment in the Stage 1 according to the previous planned schedule.
Eligible subjects completing 12 weeks of induction therapy in Stage 1 were permitted to enter Stage 2 to be evaluated for the long-term maintenance administration of CBP-307. Subjects who withdrew early from the study or completed the Stage 1, but did not enter Stage 2, entered a 4-week safety follow-up period.
Study stage 2 All subjects who completed 12 weeks of induction therapy in the study Stage 1 and completed all examinations (including colonoscopy) at Week 12 (visit 11) could choose to enter the study Stage 2 of a total length of 40 weeks, including 36 weeks of continuous treatment and 4 weeks of safety follow up after the last dose. Subjects who chose to enter the Stage 2 signed an updated informed consent form (ICF) and screened for eligibility.
The study Stage 2 contained sub-study 1 and sub-study 2. Subjects entered 1 of sub-studies based on their results of efficacy evaluation in the study Stage 1.
Sub-study 1 (subjects who achieved clinical response by adapted Mayo score): Subjects who achieved clinical response at Week 12 in the study Stage 1 and met the eligibility criteria for Stage 2 entered sub study 1 of the study Stage 2 to receive double-blind maintenance treatment for 36 weeks (Week 13 to 48), i.e., the therapeutic regimen for them in Stage 1 was continually maintained. Safety follow-up was completed at 4 weeks after the last dose. Subjects who presented with recurrent UC during maintenance treatment were terminated from the treatment and withdrew from the study.
For the subjects already enrolled as per study protocol version 5.0 or earlier, they followed the previous planned treatment in the sub-study 1 of Stage 2 study.
Sub-study 2 (subjects who did not achieve clinical response by adapted Mayo score): Subjects who did not achieve clinical response at Week 12 in study Stage 1 and met the eligibility criteria for Stage 2 entered open-label treatment with CBP-307 0.2 mg. Subjects received CBP-307 QD at an oral dose of 0.2 mg in sub study 2 regardless of whether they received CBP-307 or placebo in the study Stage 1.
For subjects who entered sub-study 2 of study Stage 2, 1-week dose titration was performed at Week 13. Dose titration involved administration of CBP 0.05 mg for 4 consecutive days from Titration Day 1 to Day 4, followed by administration of CBP-307 0.1 mg for 3 days from Titration Day 5 to Day 7, and administration of CBP-307 at a target dose of 0.2 mg initiated on Titration Day 8. After dose titration was completed, subjects received oral treatment with CBP-307 0.2 mg QD, for 36 weeks. Safety follow-up was completed at 4 weeks after the last dose. If the subjects did not achieve clinical response by the efficacy evaluation including colonoscopy at Week 24, the treatment was to be discontinued and the subjects were to withdraw from the study.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 4
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Double-Blind 0.2mg CBP-307 | Experimental | Drug: Double-Blind 0.2mg CBP-3070.2 mg CBP-307 capsules oral administration. |
| Double-Blind Placebo | Placebo comparator | Drug: Double-Blind PlaceboPlacebo capsules oral administration. |
| Open-Label CBP-307 | Experimental | Drug: Open-label CBP-3070.2 mg CBP-307 capsules oral administration. |
| Double-Blind 0.1mg CBP-307 | Experimental | Drug: Double-Blind 0.1mg CBP-3070.1 mg CBP-307 capsules oral administration. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 75 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Double-Blind 0.2mg CBP-3070.2 mg capsule oral administration | Drug | Double-Blind 0.2mg CBP-307 |
| Double-Blind PlaceboPlacebo capsule oral administration | Drug | Double-Blind Placebo |
| Open-label CBP-3070.2 mg capsule oral administration | Drug | Open-Label CBP-307 |
| Double-Blind 0.1mg CBP-3070.1 mg capsule oral administration | Drug | Double-Blind 0.1mg CBP-307 |
Primary outcome
Change From Baseline for Adapted Mayo Score: 0.2 mg Versus Placebo
Time frame: The adapted Mayo score was evaluated at screening and Week 12 (or early termination visit) during the study Stage 1 as well as at Week 24 (only for the sub-study 2) and Week 48 (or early termination visit) during the study Stage 2.
Change in adapted Mayo score from baseline at week 12 compared between CBP-307 0.2 mg and placebo in the Full Analysis Set by Multiple Imputation. Adapted Mayo scores were calculated based on data in stool frequency, rectal bleeding, and endoscopic findings. The Mayo scores range from 0 to 9 and consist of 3 subscores, each ranging from 0 to 3. The higher the score is, the more severe the disease is.
10 secondary outcomes
Change in Complete Mayo Score From Baseline
Time frame: at Week 12
Comparison of Clinical Response Rate by Adapted Mayo Score
Time frame: at Week 12
Comparison of Clinical Response Rate by Complete Mayo Score
Time frame: at Week 12
Comparison of Clinical Remission Rate by Adapted Mayo Score
Time frame: at Week 12
Comparison of Clinical Remission Rate by Complete Mayo Score
Time frame: at Week 12
Mucosal Healing Rate
Time frame: at Week 12
Incidence, Type and Severity of Treatment Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE)
Time frame: for 12 consecutive weeks
Incidence, Type and Severity of Serious Adverse Event (SAE)
Time frame: for 12 consecutive weeks
Incidence, Type and Severity of Adverse Events (AE)
Time frame: for 12 consecutive weeks
Change From Baseline in Adapted Mayo Score: 0.1 mg Versus Placebo
Time frame: at Week 12
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 6 May 2024.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Moderate to Severe Ulcerative Colitis
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
An Open-label, DDI Study to Investigate the Effects of Duvakitug on the PK of Selected Cytochrome P450 Substrates
Ulcerative Colitis, Crohn's Disease
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
An Extension Study for Treatment of Moderately to Severely Active Ulcerative Colitis
Ulcerative Colitis
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study to Evaluate the Pharmacokinetics, Safety and Efficacy of Afimkibart (RO7790121) in Children With Moderately to Severely Active Ulcerative Colitis
Moderately to Severely Active Ulcerative Colitis
RecruitingPhase 1
A Sub Study to Investigate the Safety and Tolerability of Aletekitug in Participants With Moderate To Severe Ulcerative Colitis
Colitis, Ulcerative
RecruitingPhase 2
LY4268989 in Adults With Moderately to Severely Active Ulcerative Colitis
Ulcerative Colitis (UC), Ulcerative Colitis, Active Moderate
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Suzhou Connect study director
Connect Biopharm LLC
66 sites in 4 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Double-Blind 0.2mg CBP-307, Open-label CBP-307 and Double-Blind 0.1mg CBP-307 in people with Moderate to Severe Ulcerative Colitis, run by Connect Biopharm LLC at 66 sites in 4 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 May 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 66 sites in China, United States, Ukraine, Pakistan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 2 Nov 2023). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change From Baseline for Adapted Mayo Score: 0.2 mg Versus Placebo (time frame: The adapted Mayo score was evaluated at screening and Week 12 (or early termination visit) during the study Stage 1 as well as at Week 24 (only for the sub-study 2) and Week 48 (or early termination visit) during the study Stage 2.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 May 2024.