AzTrials
AzTrials

Multiple SclerosisNCT04702763

Eye Movements Recording Using a Smartphone: Comparison to Standard Video-oculography in Patients With Multiple Sclerosis

An observational study of Multiple Sclerosis, run by Association de Recherche Bibliographique pour les Neurosciences at 1 site in Monaco.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study aims to compare measurements obtained through the e-VOG application (mobile application, usable on mobile phones or tablets, to measure eye movements) with measurements from the standard video-oculography device (Eye-Tracker®T2), in patient with Multiple Sclerosis. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Multiple Sclerosis
What is being tested?
Eye-Tracker®T2 + e-VOG and e-VOG + Eye-Tracker®T2
How many people
30 participants
Where
1 siteMonaco
Study dates
8 Oct 2020to 30 Oct 2021
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Participants will be recruited from patients with MS for whom a standard video-oculography exam is prescribed by the CRC SEP of the CHU de Nice (France) as part of routine care. Standard video-oculography exam is carried out at the Center Rainier III (Princess Grace Hospital - Monaco), in accordance with usual practices. It is used at the Centre Rainier III since August 2014. It is a non-invasive device for eye movements recording, allowing doctors and researchers to measure standard parameters related to eye movements. Developed by the Eye Brain Company (France), this is a Class IIa medical device, CE marking, according to Annexe IX of the directive 93/42/CE

Who may be able to join

  • Male or Female.
  • 18 years old and above.
  • referred by a neurologist to perform a video-oculography (Eye-Tracking) examination as part of routine care.
  • with Multiple Sclerosis (defined according to McDonald's 2017 criteria).
  • covered by a health insurance system
  • volunteer, able to give free, informed and written consent.

Who cannot join

  • General anaesthesia within 3 months.
  • Neurological, ophthalmological or general pathology preventing the realization of a video-oculography examination.
  • Oculomotor abnormality detectable on clinical examination by the neurologist prescribing the standard video-oculography examination.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Monaco1 site
  • Centre Mémoire / Centre de Gérontologie Clinique Rainier III / Princess Grace Hospital

    Monaco, 98000

Other trials in Monaco

About this study

Official title: Eye Movements Recording Using a Smartphone: Comparison to Standard Video-oculography Data in Patients With Multiple Sclerosis

This study aims to compare measurements obtained through the e-VOG application (mobile application, usable on mobile phones or tablets, to measure eye movements) with measurements from the standard video-oculography device (Eye-Tracker®T2), in patient with Multiple Sclerosis.

Read the detailed description

Based on literature, investigators hypothesize that it would be relevant to focus more broadly on subclinical abnormalities of oculomotricity in multiple sclerosis (MS). However, the difficulty of accessing video-oculography platforms (or eye-tracking devices) is probably one of the main limitations to performing this type of assessment.

To respond this problem, the "Resources and Skills Center-Multiple Sclerosis" (CRC SEP) team at the Nice University Hospital Center (France) has developed a mobile application (named e-VOG), usable on mobile phones or tablets, to measure eye movements. e-VOG reproduces the classic paradigms of video-oculography to collect data similar to standard video-oculography recording (saccade latency and speed, anti-saccade error rate, presence of fixation abnormalities).

e-VOG will not replace standard video-oculography platforms, because its technical characteristics are not as high. But investigators hypothesize that this application could constitute a screening tool for subclinical oculomotor abnormalities, usable by neurologists in consultation, directly on their mobile, which would make it possible to select a smaller population of patients in whom a further exploration by standard video-oculography would be indicated.

Memory Center of the Rainier III Gerontologic Center (Princess Grace Hospital - Monaco) is equipped with a standard video-oculography device, also named eye-tracking device (Eye-Tracker®T2), which records eye movements at a high frequency and measures saccades parameters (latency, speed, amplitudes etc...).

This study is a collaborative study between the Center Rainier III team and the CRC SEP team in Nice. Its objective will be to compare measurements obtained through the e-VOG application with measurements from the standard video-oculography device.

Being tested
Eye-Tracker®T2 + e-VOG, e-VOG + Eye-Tracker®T2
Keywords
Demyelinating disease, Multiple Sclerosis, Video-oculography, Eye-Tracking, Eye movements, Subclinical oculomotor abnormalities, Oculomotor disorders
Medical subject headings
Multiple Sclerosis, Demyelinating Diseases

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Eye-Tracker®T2 + e-VOGOther

    • 1st step: eyes movements assessed with standard video-oculography device
    • 2° step: eyes movements assessed with e-VOG digital application
    • Patient study duration is about 30 minutes, the day the patient performs their standard video-oculography examination in routine care
  • e-VOG + Eye-Tracker®T2Other

    • 1st step: eyes movements assessed with e-VOG digital application
    • 2° step: eyes movements assessed with standard video-oculography device
    • Patient study duration is about 30 minutes, the day the patient performs their standard video-oculography examination in routine care
Study groups in NCT04702763
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Multiple Sclerosis (Eye-Tracker®T2 + e-VOG)Multiple Sclerosis subjects who first perform standard video-oculography assessment, followed by e-VOG digital assessment.
Receives: Other: Eye-Tracker®T2 + e-VOG
Multiple Sclerosis (e-VOG + Eye-Tracker®T2)Multiple Sclerosis subjects who first perform e-VOG digital assessment, followed by the standard video-oculography assessment.
Receives: Other: e-VOG + Eye-Tracker®T2

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Oculomotor profiles concordance

    Analyze of the concordance of the profiles obtained between the e-VOG digital assessment and the standard video-oculography assessment.

    Evaluation criteria: For each assessment, patients will be classified into 3 profiles (Profile 1 = profile without oculomotor abnormality; Profile 2 = intermediate profile with 1 to 2 oculomotor abnormalities; Profile 3: profile with 3 to 4 oculomotor anomalies), based on the observation of 4 parameters (latency / speed / fixation disorders / presence of internuclear ophthalmoplegia), in accordance with the literature standards.

    Measured: Day 0

Secondary outcomes (10)
  1. Latency during horizontal reflex saccades

    Measure of Latency during an horizontal reflex saccades paradigm with e-VOG Compared to the one performed with standard video-oculography device.

    Evaluation criteria: latency (reaction time in ms).

    Measured: Day 0

  2. Latency during vertical reflex saccades

    Measure of Latency during a vertical reflex saccades paradigm with e-VOG Compared to the one performed with standard video-oculography device.

    Evaluation criteria: latency (reaction time in ms).

    Measured: Day 0

  3. Velocity during horizontal reflex saccades

    Measure of Velocity during an horizontal reflex saccades paradigm with e-VOG Compared to the one performed with standard video-oculography device.

    Evaluation criteria: velocity (mean and peak velocity) in °/s.

    Measured: Day 0

  4. Velocity during vertical reflex saccades

    Measure of Velocity during a vertical reflex saccades paradigm with e-VOG Compared to the one performed with standard video-oculography device.

    Evaluation criteria: velocity (mean and peak velocity) in °/s.

    Measured: Day 0

  5. Inhibition capacity

    Measure of inhibition capacity performance during an antisaccades" paradigm with e-VOG Compared to the one evaluated with standard video-oculography device.

    Evaluation criteria: percentage of errors.

    Measured: Day 0

  6. Internuclear ophthalmoplegia (INO) detection

    Highlight presence/absence of INO with e-VOG Compared to standard video-oculography device.

    Evaluation criteria: INO is present if calculated ratio of abducting to adducting eye movement (both mean and peak velocity) is >1.

    Measured: Day 0

  7. Fixations impairments detection

    Highlight presence/absence of Fixations impairments with e-VOG Compared to standard video-oculography device.

    Evaluation criteria: presence/absence/frequency of square wave-jerks, nystagmus, flutters.

    Measured: Day 0

  8. Impairment of horizontal smooth pursuit

    Highlight Impairment of horizontal smooth pursuit with e-VOG Compared to standard video-oculography device.

    Evaluation criteria: presence/absence of saccade and perturbation.

    Measured: Day 0

  9. Impairment of vertical smooth pursuit

    Highlight Impairment of horizontal smooth pursuit with e-VOG Compared to standard video-oculography device.

    Evaluation criteria: presence/absence of saccade and perturbation.

    Measured: Day 0

  10. Patient acceptability of the e-VOG digital assessment

    Comparison of patient acceptability between the e-VOG digital assessment and the standard video-oculography assessment.

    Evaluation criteria: satisfaction questionnaire given to the patient at the end of assessments. 2 questions on the difficulty or discomfort felt during the 2 assessments.

    Measured: Day 0

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted11 Jan 2021
  2. Study start8 Oct 2020
  3. Primary completion30 Oct 2021
  4. Study completion30 Oct 2021

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrolment
30 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04702763
Sponsor's protocol ID
e-VOG
Status last verified
Jan 2022
First submitted
7 Jan 2021
Last updated
27 Jan 2022
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Multiple Sclerosis, run by Association de Recherche Bibliographique pour les Neurosciences at 1 site in Monaco.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Jan 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Monaco. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Oculomotor profiles concordance (time frame: Day 0). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Jan 2022; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 1 Nov 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in