Bimaxillary ProclinationNCT04705545
Anchorage Reinforcement in Bimaxillary Proclination Cases
A study testing transpalatal arch group and Nance button in people with Bimaxillary Proclination, run by University of Malaya at 1 site in Malaysia.
Trial summary
Bimaxillary protrusion are common in Malaysia due to the prevalence in the two biggest races (Malay and Chinese). However, evidence for treatment methods and outcomes for bimaxillary protrusion patients are scarce. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 16 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Bimaxillary Proclination
- What is being tested?
- transpalatal arch group and Nance button
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 15 participants
- Where
- 1 siteMalaysia
- Study dates
- 2 Jan 2021to Jun 2024
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 16 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients with:
- a need to correct bimaxillary proclination
- age of 16 years old and above
- a need for extraction of the permanent first premolars
- mild space requirement (less than 4mm), no crowding or spaced dentition
- good oral hygiene
Who cannot join
- Patient with
- hypodontia
- history of orthodontic treatment or extractions (except third molars)
- congenital oral-maxillofacial deformities such as cleft lip and palate
- syndromic diseases
- orthognathic treatment need
- poor dental health precluding orthodontic treatment
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Malaysia1 site
Faculty of Dentistry, University Malaya
Kuala Lumpur, Kuala Lumpur, 50603
About this study
Official title: Anchorage Reinforcement in Bimaxillary Proclination Cases - a 3-arm Randomised Controlled Trial
Bimaxillary protrusion are common in Malaysia due to the prevalence in the two biggest races (Malay and Chinese). However, evidence for treatment methods and outcomes for bimaxillary protrusion patients are scarce. The need for high anchorage in bimaxillary protrusion cases also makes them perfect candidates for a study on the effectiveness of different anchorage methods commonly used in treatment of bimaxillary protrusion cases. The soft tissue outcomes from the use of these different methods are also our area of interest. Hence, the investigators aim is to prove that molar block anchorage similarly effective and has the same outcome as using other conventional auxiliary anchorage such as TPA and Nance button in treating patients with bimaxillary protrusion.
Read the detailed description
Bimaxillary proclination is common in Malaysia especially among Malay, Chinese and possibly the Malaysian Aborigines. Treatment commonly constitutes extraction of upper and lower first permanent premolars with maximum anchorage requirement. Various anchorage device exists, but conventional devices such as Nance button, transpalatal arch and molar blocks are still commonly used to good effect in treatment of bimaxillary proclination. A comparison of these commonly used conventional anchorage devices (molar block, transpalatal arch, Nance button), especially in treating bimaxillary proclination cases, surprisingly has not been done.
Soft tissue changes also occur in bimaxillary proclination. However, changes in the soft tissue profile using these conventional anchorage devices do not exist, as evidence shows that anchorage devices can affect soft tissue outcomes
Hence, the investigators aim to investigate compare the effectiveness and soft tissue changes of using just molar blocks, molar blocks with transpalatal arch and molar blocks with Nance button.
This study will be done as a 3-arm parallel randomised controlled trial. The allocation ration is set at 1:1:1. This study will adhere to the PICO and CONSORT guidelines, and will be registered with the clinical.org website.
Sample size calculation was conducted using G Power 3.9.1.4. The standard deviation of the movement of maxillary permanent first molar was estimated at 2.2 mm. The mean difference of 1.00 mm was considered the smallest important difference to be detected, which was also used as the effect size. In order to detect the difference of 1.00 mm with a power of 0.80 (80%) and an alpha of 0.05, accounting for a 20% dropout, the total sample size required is 15, which will be randomised into 3 groups (5 Nance group, 5 TPA group and 5 molar block group).
Each patient will be randomised by the following protocol. A simple stratified randomisation method is done with gender as the stratification factor, using Sealed Envelope Ltd. 2019. Each allocation is written on a paper, which will be folded twice (to reduce bias), placed in separate opaque envelopes and sealed. The envelopes will be coded by gender using stickers and numbered in sequence. Each gender will have their own sequence of numbers (male: 1-16, female: 1-17). The envelopes will be stored in a locked drawer in the Orthodontic Dental Clinic.
Eligible patients are then screened from the orthodontic waiting list by three operator clinicians according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria set. Patients identified will be given an explanation on the trial and will be invited to take part. Upon receiving informed consent from patients, the envelope will be allocated to patients according to the number sequence.
Full orthodontic examination, records taking (pre-treatment radiograph (cephalometric radiographs, panoramic radiographs, and other necessary additional periapical radiographs), photographs and study models) and treatment planning will be done. The pre-treatment study model will be labelled as T0.
The following treatment protocol is then followed:
Group A: No additional anchorage reinforcements besides the banding first and second molar with and tying them together at the buccal tubes (also known as molar block).
Group B: Bands are selected and an alginate impression taken over the bands. The impression will be sent to the lab for the construction of a transpalatal archwire on a 1.0 mm stainless steel wire connecting the upper permanent first molar, with a U loop pointing posteriorly, soldered to the palatal side of the molar bands. The appliance will be fitted a week later. Molar bands will be fitted to the permanent second molar on the same appointment, with a ligature wire tying the first molar band together at the buccal tubes. The resulting anchorage reinforcement is a molar block with a transpalatal archwire.
Group C: Bands are selected and an alginate impression taken over the bands. Bands are replaced on the tooth and an alginate impression taken over the bands. The impression will be sent to the lab for the construction of a transpalatal archwire on a 1.0 mm stainless steel wire connecting the upper permanent first molar, with a Nance button incorporated in the middle of the wire, soldered to the palatal side of the molar bands. The appliance will be fitted a week later. Molar bands will be fitted to the permanent second molar on the same appointment, with a ligature wire tying the first molar band together at the buccal tubes. The resulting anchorage reinforcement is a molar block with a Nance button
Next, patients will undergo planned extraction of upper and lower permanent first premolars.
Treatment is started with alignment and levelling using preadjusted Edgewise fixed appliances (Gemini McLaughlin, Bennett, Trevisi (MBT) Twin Bracket 5x5 [3M Unitek, Monrovia, CA, USA] prescription; 0.022-in slot size) following a straight wire concept on the upper and lower arches. The wire sequence used were as follows i. 0.016-in heat activated Nickel Titanium [3M Unitek], ii. 0.018 x 0.025-in heat activated Nickel Titanium [3M Unitek], iii. 0.019 x 0.025-in stainless steel [3M Unitek]).
At this point, a snap impression is taken (T1).
Before impression taking, a marking is done on the upper first molar buccal cusps with indelible ink to mark the position of the molar band. The molar bands (with or without the Nance button or TPA) will be removed. A satisfactory upper arch snap impression is taken. The molar bands (with or without the anchorage reinforcement device) are recemented on the teeth using the mark on the buccal cusp to improve accuracy and reduce bias.
Next, space closure is done using intramaxillary traction mechanics using primarily Nickel Titanium alloy closed coil springs, due to their consistent and efficient force delivery compared to elastomeric chains. The completion of space closure will be assumed when all spaces are closed. At this point, the auxiliary anchorage reinforcements are removed (Nance button or TPA), leaving just the molar blocks (molar band on first and second permanent molars). A snap impression will be taken at completion of space closure (T2). A cephalometric radiograph is also taken. Treatment is continued and completed as planned for every patient involved in the study.
The models (T0, T1 and T2) will be sent to the 3D Gens Lab to be scanned, to obtain digital 3-dimensional models in STL format. Superimposition will be done by Mimics software which allows 3D superimposition and measurements to be done. We will use a designated stable area on the palate, which allows measurements in all three planes. In our study, we will be using the 'mushroom area' of the palate, which is a stable structure commonly used for superimposition, even in growing patients. It is also an area which is easier to designate due to the area covered. The area of the palate covered includes:
- anteriorly: the medial 2/3 of the third rugae anteriorly
- laterally: two lines parallel to the midpalatal suture laterally
- posteriorly: 5 mm from the third rugae posteriorly
- extending to the level of an imaginary line connecting the lingual grooves of the 1st permanent molars.
The treatment and impressions will be done by 2 operators. The following superimposition \& measurement of the 3-dimensional dental casts will be done by a single researcher in all 3 planes. Finally, before the digital model superimposition and measurements are done, 10 random models will be superimposed and measured first. The process will be repeated in 2 weeks for an inter-class correlation coefficient (ICC) to assess intra-rater reliability of the superimposition and measurement procedure.
Due to the nature of this study, no blinding will be done on the patient or the treating operator as it would not be possible. Blinding will be done during the data collection and analysis stage by coding every patient before sending the models to the lab for data processing and collection. A single researcher will be handling all the data.
The statistical analysis for this study will be done using SPSS statistics version 23 [IBM, Illinois, USA]. The raw data will first be tested for normal distribution, followed by descriptive statistics using a demographic characteristics chart. Next, an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA), with gender as a stratifying factor will be done, where probabilities less than 5% (P < 0.05) will be considered significant. Data will also be analysed on an intention-to-treat basis, to take into account any unsuccessful or dropout cases. An ICC will also be done to assess the intra-rater reliability in superimposing and measurements.
- Conditions
- Bimaxillary Proclination
- Being tested
- transpalatal arch group, Nance button
- Keywords
- bimaxillary proclination, anchorage, soft tissue changes
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
transpalatal arch groupDevice
Also called TPA
transpalatal arch is a 1.0 mm stainless steel wire connecting the upper permanent first molar, with a U loop pointing posteriorly, soldered to the palatal side of the molar bands.
Nance buttonDevice
Nance button is a 1.0mm stainless steel wire connecting the upper permanent first molar, with a Nance button incorporated in the middle of the wire, soldered to the palatal side of the molar bands
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| molar block | No intervention | No additional anchorage reinforcements besides the banding first and second molar with and tying them together at the buccal tubes (also known as molar block) |
| TPA group | Experimental | Bands are selected and an alginate impression taken over the bands. The impression will be sent to the lab for the construction of a transpalatal archwire on a 1.0 mm stainless steel wire connecting the upper permanent first molar, with a U loop pointing posteriorly, soldered to the palatal side of the molar bands. The appliance will be fitted a week later. Molar bands will be fitted to the permanent second molar on the same appointment, with a ligature wire tying the first molar band together at the buccal tubes. The resulting anchorage reinforcement is a molar block with a transpalatal archwire. Receives: Device: transpalatal arch group |
| Nance button group | Experimental | Bands are selected and an alginate impression taken over the bands. Bands are replaced on the tooth and an alginate impression taken over the bands. The impression will be sent to the lab for the construction of a transpalatal archwire on a 1.0 mm stainless steel wire connecting the upper permanent first molar, with a Nance button incorporated in the middle of the wire, soldered to the palatal side of the molar bands. The appliance will be fitted a week later. Molar bands will be fitted to the permanent second molar on the same appointment, with a ligature wire tying the first molar band together at the buccal tubes. The resulting anchorage reinforcement is a molar block with a Nance button Receives: Device: Nance button |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
molar movement
Three plane movement of the maxillary permanent first molar in terms of anchorage loss (in mm)
Measured: 24 months
Soft tissue cephalometric changes (angle)
Nasolabial angle, H angle and facial convexity angle
Measured: 24 months
Soft tissue cephalometric changes (degrees)
E line, labiomental sulcus depth, upper lip length, lip protuberance
Measured: 24 months
Secondary outcomes (3)
Duration of treatment visits (minutes)
Duration of treatment visits (T0 - T2)
Measured: 24 months
Number of treatment visits (days)
Number of treatment visits (T0 - T2)
Measured: 24 months
Hard tissue cephalometric changes (degrees)
S-N-A point angle, S-N-B point angle, A-N-B point angle, Maxillary-Mandibular Plane angle
Measured: 24 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted12 Jan 2021
- Study start2 Jan 2021
- Primary completionJun 2024 (estimated)
- Study completionJun 2024 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (6)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Bimaxillary ProclinationStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 15 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Malaya
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Dr. Kumeran Mohan, University of Malaya
- Investigators
- Siti A Othman, MOrthRCSEd, Study director, Faculty of Dentistry, University Malaya
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04705545
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- UM_ORTHO_KM001
- Status last verified
- May 2024
- First submitted
- 29 Nov 2020
- Last updated
- 31 May 2024
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Alqahtani ND, Alshammari R, Almoammar K, Almosa N, Almahdy A, Albarakati SF. Post-orthodontic cephalometric variations in bimaxillary protrusion cases managed by premolar extraction - A retrospective study. Niger J Clin Pract. 2019 Nov;22(11):1530-1538. doi: 10.4103/njcp.njcp_125_19.
PubMed 31719274Dixon V, Read MJ, O'Brien KD, Worthington HV, Mandall NA. A randomized clinical trial to compare three methods of orthodontic space closure. J Orthod. 2002 Mar;29(1):31-6. doi: 10.1093/ortho/29.1.31.
PubMed 11907307Samuels RH, Rudge SJ, Mair LH. A comparison of the rate of space closure using a nickel-titanium spring and an elastic module: a clinical study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1993 May;103(5):464-7. doi: 10.1016/S0889-5406(05)81798-6.
PubMed 8480716Ganzer N, Feldmann I, Bondemark L. Anchorage reinforcement with miniscrews and molar blocks in adolescents: A randomized controlled trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2018 Dec;154(6):758-767. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2018.07.011.
PubMed 30477773Solem RC, Marasco R, Guiterrez-Pulido L, Nielsen I, Kim SH, Nelson G. Three-dimensional soft-tissue and hard-tissue changes in the treatment of bimaxillary protrusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2013 Aug;144(2):218-28. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.03.018.
PubMed 23910203Vasilakos G, Schilling R, Halazonetis D, Gkantidis N. Assessment of different techniques for 3D superimposition of serial digital maxillary dental casts on palatal structures. Sci Rep. 2017 Jul 19;7(1):5838. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-06013-5.
PubMed 28724930
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 31 May 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Anchorage Reinforcement in Bimaxillary Proclination Cases - a 3-arm Randomised Controlled Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04705545
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- UM_ORTHO_KM001
- Conditions
- Bimaxillary Proclination
- Keywords
- bimaxillary proclination, anchorage, soft tissue changes
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 15 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of MalayaUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 2 Jan 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Jun 2024 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Jun 2024 (estimated)
- First posted
- 12 Jan 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Bimaxillary protrusion are common in Malaysia due to the prevalence in the two biggest races (Malay and Chinese). However, evidence for treatment methods and outcomes for bimaxillary protrusion patients are scarce. The need for high anchorage in bimaxillary protrusion cases also makes them perfect candidates for a study on the effectiveness of different anchorage methods commonly used in treatment of bimaxillary protrusion cases. The soft tissue outcomes from the use of these different methods are also our area of interest. Hence, the investigators aim is to prove that molar block anchorage similarly effective and has the same outcome as using other conventional auxiliary anchorage such as TPA and Nance button in treating patients with bimaxillary protrusion.
Detailed description
Bimaxillary proclination is common in Malaysia especially among Malay, Chinese and possibly the Malaysian Aborigines. Treatment commonly constitutes extraction of upper and lower first permanent premolars with maximum anchorage requirement. Various anchorage device exists, but conventional devices such as Nance button, transpalatal arch and molar blocks are still commonly used to good effect in treatment of bimaxillary proclination. A comparison of these commonly used conventional anchorage devices (molar block, transpalatal arch, Nance button), especially in treating bimaxillary proclination cases, surprisingly has not been done.
Soft tissue changes also occur in bimaxillary proclination. However, changes in the soft tissue profile using these conventional anchorage devices do not exist, as evidence shows that anchorage devices can affect soft tissue outcomes
Hence, the investigators aim to investigate compare the effectiveness and soft tissue changes of using just molar blocks, molar blocks with transpalatal arch and molar blocks with Nance button.
This study will be done as a 3-arm parallel randomised controlled trial. The allocation ration is set at 1:1:1. This study will adhere to the PICO and CONSORT guidelines, and will be registered with the clinical.org website.
Sample size calculation was conducted using G Power 3.9.1.4. The standard deviation of the movement of maxillary permanent first molar was estimated at 2.2 mm. The mean difference of 1.00 mm was considered the smallest important difference to be detected, which was also used as the effect size. In order to detect the difference of 1.00 mm with a power of 0.80 (80%) and an alpha of 0.05, accounting for a 20% dropout, the total sample size required is 15, which will be randomised into 3 groups (5 Nance group, 5 TPA group and 5 molar block group).
Each patient will be randomised by the following protocol. A simple stratified randomisation method is done with gender as the stratification factor, using Sealed Envelope Ltd. 2019. Each allocation is written on a paper, which will be folded twice (to reduce bias), placed in separate opaque envelopes and sealed. The envelopes will be coded by gender using stickers and numbered in sequence. Each gender will have their own sequence of numbers (male: 1-16, female: 1-17). The envelopes will be stored in a locked drawer in the Orthodontic Dental Clinic.
Eligible patients are then screened from the orthodontic waiting list by three operator clinicians according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria set. Patients identified will be given an explanation on the trial and will be invited to take part. Upon receiving informed consent from patients, the envelope will be allocated to patients according to the number sequence.
Full orthodontic examination, records taking (pre-treatment radiograph (cephalometric radiographs, panoramic radiographs, and other necessary additional periapical radiographs), photographs and study models) and treatment planning will be done. The pre-treatment study model will be labelled as T0.
The following treatment protocol is then followed:
Group A: No additional anchorage reinforcements besides the banding first and second molar with and tying them together at the buccal tubes (also known as molar block).
Group B: Bands are selected and an alginate impression taken over the bands. The impression will be sent to the lab for the construction of a transpalatal archwire on a 1.0 mm stainless steel wire connecting the upper permanent first molar, with a U loop pointing posteriorly, soldered to the palatal side of the molar bands. The appliance will be fitted a week later. Molar bands will be fitted to the permanent second molar on the same appointment, with a ligature wire tying the first molar band together at the buccal tubes. The resulting anchorage reinforcement is a molar block with a transpalatal archwire.
Group C: Bands are selected and an alginate impression taken over the bands. Bands are replaced on the tooth and an alginate impression taken over the bands. The impression will be sent to the lab for the construction of a transpalatal archwire on a 1.0 mm stainless steel wire connecting the upper permanent first molar, with a Nance button incorporated in the middle of the wire, soldered to the palatal side of the molar bands. The appliance will be fitted a week later. Molar bands will be fitted to the permanent second molar on the same appointment, with a ligature wire tying the first molar band together at the buccal tubes. The resulting anchorage reinforcement is a molar block with a Nance button
Next, patients will undergo planned extraction of upper and lower permanent first premolars.
Treatment is started with alignment and levelling using preadjusted Edgewise fixed appliances (Gemini McLaughlin, Bennett, Trevisi (MBT) Twin Bracket 5x5 [3M Unitek, Monrovia, CA, USA] prescription; 0.022-in slot size) following a straight wire concept on the upper and lower arches. The wire sequence used were as follows i. 0.016-in heat activated Nickel Titanium [3M Unitek], ii. 0.018 x 0.025-in heat activated Nickel Titanium [3M Unitek], iii. 0.019 x 0.025-in stainless steel [3M Unitek]).
At this point, a snap impression is taken (T1).
Before impression taking, a marking is done on the upper first molar buccal cusps with indelible ink to mark the position of the molar band. The molar bands (with or without the Nance button or TPA) will be removed. A satisfactory upper arch snap impression is taken. The molar bands (with or without the anchorage reinforcement device) are recemented on the teeth using the mark on the buccal cusp to improve accuracy and reduce bias.
Next, space closure is done using intramaxillary traction mechanics using primarily Nickel Titanium alloy closed coil springs, due to their consistent and efficient force delivery compared to elastomeric chains. The completion of space closure will be assumed when all spaces are closed. At this point, the auxiliary anchorage reinforcements are removed (Nance button or TPA), leaving just the molar blocks (molar band on first and second permanent molars). A snap impression will be taken at completion of space closure (T2). A cephalometric radiograph is also taken. Treatment is continued and completed as planned for every patient involved in the study.
The models (T0, T1 and T2) will be sent to the 3D Gens Lab to be scanned, to obtain digital 3-dimensional models in STL format. Superimposition will be done by Mimics software which allows 3D superimposition and measurements to be done. We will use a designated stable area on the palate, which allows measurements in all three planes. In our study, we will be using the 'mushroom area' of the palate, which is a stable structure commonly used for superimposition, even in growing patients. It is also an area which is easier to designate due to the area covered. The area of the palate covered includes:
- anteriorly: the medial 2/3 of the third rugae anteriorly
- laterally: two lines parallel to the midpalatal suture laterally
- posteriorly: 5 mm from the third rugae posteriorly
- extending to the level of an imaginary line connecting the lingual grooves of the 1st permanent molars.
The treatment and impressions will be done by 2 operators. The following superimposition \& measurement of the 3-dimensional dental casts will be done by a single researcher in all 3 planes. Finally, before the digital model superimposition and measurements are done, 10 random models will be superimposed and measured first. The process will be repeated in 2 weeks for an inter-class correlation coefficient (ICC) to assess intra-rater reliability of the superimposition and measurement procedure.
Due to the nature of this study, no blinding will be done on the patient or the treating operator as it would not be possible. Blinding will be done during the data collection and analysis stage by coding every patient before sending the models to the lab for data processing and collection. A single researcher will be handling all the data.
The statistical analysis for this study will be done using SPSS statistics version 23 [IBM, Illinois, USA]. The raw data will first be tested for normal distribution, followed by descriptive statistics using a demographic characteristics chart. Next, an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA), with gender as a stratifying factor will be done, where probabilities less than 5% (P < 0.05) will be considered significant. Data will also be analysed on an intention-to-treat basis, to take into account any unsuccessful or dropout cases. An ICC will also be done to assess the intra-rater reliability in superimposing and measurements.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| molar block | No intervention | –No additional anchorage reinforcements besides the banding first and second molar with and tying them together at the buccal tubes (also known as molar block) |
| TPA group | Experimental | Device: transpalatal arch groupBands are selected and an alginate impression taken over the bands. The impression will be sent to the lab for the construction of a transpalatal archwire on a 1.0 mm stainless steel wire connecting the upper permanent first molar, with a U loop pointing posteriorly, soldered to the palatal side of the molar bands. The appliance will be fitted a week later. Molar bands will be fitted to the permanent second molar on the same appointment, with a ligature wire tying the first molar band together at the buccal tubes. The resulting anchorage reinforcement is a molar block with a transpalatal archwire. |
| Nance button group | Experimental | Device: Nance buttonBands are selected and an alginate impression taken over the bands. Bands are replaced on the tooth and an alginate impression taken over the bands. The impression will be sent to the lab for the construction of a transpalatal archwire on a 1.0 mm stainless steel wire connecting the upper permanent first molar, with a Nance button incorporated in the middle of the wire, soldered to the palatal side of the molar bands. The appliance will be fitted a week later. Molar bands will be fitted to the permanent second molar on the same appointment, with a ligature wire tying the first molar band together at the buccal tubes. The resulting anchorage reinforcement is a molar block with a Nance button |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 16 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- a need to correct bimaxillary proclination
- age of 16 years old and above
- a need for extraction of the permanent first premolars
- mild space requirement (less than 4mm), no crowding or spaced dentition
- good oral hygiene
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Patient with
- hypodontia
- history of orthodontic treatment or extractions (except third molars)
- congenital oral-maxillofacial deformities such as cleft lip and palate
- syndromic diseases
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| transpalatal arch groupAlso: TPAtranspalatal arch is a 1.0 mm stainless steel wire connecting the upper permanent first molar, with a U loop pointing posteriorly, soldered to the palatal side of the molar bands. | Device | TPA group |
| Nance buttonNance button is a 1.0mm stainless steel wire connecting the upper permanent first molar, with a Nance button incorporated in the middle of the wire, soldered to the palatal side of the molar bands | Device | Nance button group |
Primary outcome
molar movement
Time frame: 24 months
Three plane movement of the maxillary permanent first molar in terms of anchorage loss (in mm)
Soft tissue cephalometric changes (angle)
Time frame: 24 months
Nasolabial angle, H angle and facial convexity angle
Soft tissue cephalometric changes (degrees)
Time frame: 24 months
E line, labiomental sulcus depth, upper lip length, lip protuberance
3 secondary outcomes
Duration of treatment visits (minutes)
Time frame: 24 months
Number of treatment visits (days)
Time frame: 24 months
Hard tissue cephalometric changes (degrees)
Time frame: 24 months
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 31 May 2024.
- Background: PubMed 31719274Alqahtani ND, Alshammari R, Almoammar K, Almosa N, Almahdy A, Albarakati SF. Post-orthodontic cephalometric variations in bimaxillary protrusion cases managed by premolar extraction - A retrospective study. Niger J Clin Pract. 2019 Nov;22(11):1530-1538. doi: 10.4103/njcp.njcp_125_19.
- Background: PubMed 11907307Dixon V, Read MJ, O'Brien KD, Worthington HV, Mandall NA. A randomized clinical trial to compare three methods of orthodontic space closure. J Orthod. 2002 Mar;29(1):31-6. doi: 10.1093/ortho/29.1.31.
- Background: PubMed 8480716Samuels RH, Rudge SJ, Mair LH. A comparison of the rate of space closure using a nickel-titanium spring and an elastic module: a clinical study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1993 May;103(5):464-7. doi: 10.1016/S0889-5406(05)81798-6.
- Background: PubMed 30477773Ganzer N, Feldmann I, Bondemark L. Anchorage reinforcement with miniscrews and molar blocks in adolescents: A randomized controlled trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2018 Dec;154(6):758-767. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2018.07.011.
- Background: PubMed 23910203Solem RC, Marasco R, Guiterrez-Pulido L, Nielsen I, Kim SH, Nelson G. Three-dimensional soft-tissue and hard-tissue changes in the treatment of bimaxillary protrusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2013 Aug;144(2):218-28. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.03.018.
- Background: PubMed 28724930Vasilakos G, Schilling R, Halazonetis D, Gkantidis N. Assessment of different techniques for 3D superimposition of serial digital maxillary dental casts on palatal structures. Sci Rep. 2017 Jul 19;7(1):5838. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-06013-5.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Bimaxillary Proclination
Not yet recruiting
Survival, Success, Stability, and Patient Comfort of TADs Placed by Steady Oblique-Angled Versus Two-Step Angulation Insertion Techniques
Bimaxillary Proclination, Bimaxillary Protrusion
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Siti A Othman, MOrthRCSEd study director
Faculty of Dentistry, University Malaya
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing transpalatal arch group and Nance button in people with Bimaxillary Proclination, run by University of Malaya at 1 site in Malaysia.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 31 May 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Malaysia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
molar movement (time frame: 24 months). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04705545, which also lists 6 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 31 May 2024.