AzTrials
AzTrials

Endometrial CancerTAPERNCT04705649

Tailored Adjuvant Therapy in POLE-mutated and p53-wildtype Early Stage Endometrial Cancer

A study testing Treatment de-escalation in people with Endometrial Cancer, run by British Columbia Cancer Agency at 1 site in Canada.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Endometrial cancer(EC) is the 4th most common cancer in women globally. Clinicians struggle to determine 'the best' treatment for endometrial cancers as they are very hard to tell apart under the microscope. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older, women only
Conditions the study is for
Endometrial Cancer
What is being tested?
Treatment de-escalation
How many people
42 participants
Where
1 siteCanada
Study dates
14 Jul 2020to 22 Jun 2023
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • Women only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Histologically confirmed endometrial carcinoma, with one of the following combinations of FIGO stage, grade, and LVI: Stage IA (not confined to polyp), grade 3 (with or without LVI), pN0 Stage IB, grade 1, 2 pNx/N0 with or without LVI Stage IB, grade 3 without LVI pN0 Stage II (microscopic), grade 1 or 2, pN0 and without substantial LVI Surgery consisting of hysterectomy (total abdominal, laparoscopic or robotic-assisted) and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. Lymph node dissection can be performed as per institutional standards (sentinel or full lymphadenectomy). Pelvic LN assessment is required for grade 3 or stage II cancers. Para-aortic lymphadenectomy is not mandated.
  • Age ≥18 years
  • Eastern Cooperative Group (ECOG) performance status 0, 1 or 2.
  • Ability to understand and willing to sign a written informed consent document.

Who cannot join

  • Prior chemotherapy for endometrial cancer or previous pelvic radiation.
  • History of another invasive malignancy, except for non-melanoma skin cancers or tumors curatively treated with no evidence of disease for ≥ 5 years
  • Inability to be registered and receive treatment within 12 weeks of hysterectomy .
  • Abnormal p53 (p53abn) and/or mismatch repair deficiency (MMRd) on immunohistochemistry without pathogenic POLE mutation.
  • MELF (microcystic, elongated and fragmented (MELF)) pattern of invasion is excluded within p53wt/NSMP tumors, not POLEmut

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Canada1 site
  • BC Cancer - Vancouver Centre

    Vancouver, British Columbia, V5Z 2E6

Other trials in Canada

About this study

Endometrial cancer(EC) is the 4th most common cancer in women globally. Clinicians struggle to determine 'the best' treatment for endometrial cancers as they are very hard to tell apart under the microscope. Our BC team developed and validated a low-cost practical tool that can reliably distinguish ECs by molecular features. Molecular classification can inform women about the likelihood of their disease coming back as well as which treatments might work best for them or are not needed. Investigators are studying how this classifier can identify women at very low risk of disease recurrence in order to spare them toxic therapies.

Read the detailed description

Purpose:

This proposal will for the first time test the clinical utility of ProMisE in a pan-Canadian setting. Through molecular classification, Investigators are closer to providing consistent treatment to women with EC reducing disparities in care as might be observed according to geography/access to care, and/or racial differences. As the primary focus for this trial investigators will focus on identifying women investigators believe may be overtreated, working to avoid giving toxic therapies with consequential side effects of treatment as many women with EC may be cured by surgery alone. However, by performing molecular classification for all new ECs enrolled investigators will also be able to identify women who are at increased risk of recurrence or death from their disease based on molecular features and direct them to molecular-subtype-specific clinical trials. This will, investigators believe, reduce undertreatment (not identifying and treating women at high risk for recurrence) and will help select the best treatment according to an individuals tumor biology. In summary, the research proposed will assess the feasibility and impact of ProMisE-directed care within a rigorous clinical setting - fulfilling the last step in bringing molecular classification-driven care to women across the country with EC and ultimately improving outcomes for women with this disease.

Hypothesis:

There is a subgroup of early stage endometrial carcinomas that are at very low risk of pelvic recurrence and can be identified through molecular classification providing an opportunity to withhold or deescalate adjuvant therapy.

Objectives:

Primary Objective:

Determine if women with POLE-mutated or p53 wild type/NSMP early stage endometrial cancer who undergo surgery (hysterectomy, BSO, +/-LND)have a low risk (<5%) risk of pelvic (including vaginal) recurrence at 3 years with no or de-escalated adjuvant treatment.

Secondary Objectives:

  1. Determine recurrence-free survival.
  2. Determine overall survival.
  3. Determine sites of recurrence (vaginal, pelvic, distant).
  4. Determine health economic impact of molecular classification-tailored adjuvant therapy on the cost of treating endometrial cancer
  5. Determine the impact of molecular classification on patient Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS)
  6. Determine if variability in adjuvant treatment given to women with endometrial cancer is decreased by molecular classification-tailored adjuvant therapy as compared to current/historic standard of care.

Exploratory Objectives:

  1. Are there additional molecular parameters that further stratify risk of recurrence within POLE or p53wt ECs.

Other mutations are also on the Contextual Genomics FindIt™ panel and will be recorded for testing of prognostic or predictive value but will not be used to stratify care nor direct therapy in real time. Similarly L1CAM IHC on whole sections of representative tumor will be performed and tested for associations with outcomes. Additional analysis might include further IHC, proteomic, epigenetic assessment, and immune markers.Investigators will have the opportunity to weigh multiple molecular and clinicopathological parameters captured in data collection post hoc to see if any of these improve prognostic ability when applied with ProMisE.

Research design:

This is A single arm prospective cohort study is the most efficient trial design to address the primary hypothesis. Study investigators have experience with similar successful trials in other disease sites (breast-DUCHESS, LUMINA). Some components of this molecular based tool are now widely reported on standard of care pathology reports (MMRd, p53) making the possibility of creating a cohort blinded to these molecular results and thus randomization of this cohort impractical. With implications of these molecular features impacting HCP referrals, pathology categorization, and treatment opportunities (e.g., immune blockade) it is not appropriate to withhold these molecular results from patients. Randomization and creation of true blinded cohorts are therefore no longer feasible. Despite increasing availability of some of these molecular features in most cancer centers, POLE mutation testing has not routinely been available, and as yet there are no algorithms to direct management based upon molecular status thus practice variability is large. A prospective trial will get all components of the molecular classifier into the hands of clinicians and patients. Investigators have evidence-based publications supporting treatment recommendations herein, although taken from retrospective series or preclinical work. Investigators have a randomized controlled trial in molecular classification-driven care (PORTEC4a) that although not mature enough to be published has revealed no concerns for higher rates of adverse events in the observation-only arms that would threaten continuation. As clinicians are already beginning to factor molecular features into their management recommendations it is imperative that investigators measure the impact of implementation of molecular based triage in a controlled setting. This will enable us to have preassigned 'stop' mechanisms in place if higher than anticipated recurrence rates are note and has the potential to change future algorithms for care.

NB: This trial will be conducted in compliance with the protocol, GCP and all applicable regulatory requirements.

Statistical design:

Primary Endpoint:

The primary aim of this study is to provide reliable estimates of the 3-year cumulative incidence of pelvic recurrence, and to confirm that this probability is sufficiently low e.g. de-escalation or no adjuvant therapy is safe in molecular classification selected early stage ECs.

Being tested
Treatment de-escalation
Medical subject headings
Endometrial Neoplasms

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Treatment de-escalationOther

    De-escalation from standard treatment based on molecular profile

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Pelvic recurrence

    recurrent disease in the pelvis (including the vagina)

    Measured: every 6 months for the first 3 years

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. Recurrence free survival

    duration of time from registration to time of relapse or death, whichever occurs first

    Measured: every 6 months for the first 3 years

  2. Overall survival

    duration of time from registration to time of death from any cause.

    Measured: every 6 months for the first 3 years

  3. Sites of relapse

    local (vagina), regional (pelvic and/or paraaortic nodal), or distant.

    Measured: every 6 months for the first 3 years

  4. Patient Decisional Conflict Scale

    a validated tool reflecting patient decision making prior to and post intervention or new information

    Measured: through study completion, an average of 3 years

  5. Variation in treatment

    proportion of cases enrolled where adjuvant treatment administered deviated from recommendations

    Measured: through study completion, an average of 3 years

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted12 Jan 2021
  2. Study start14 Jul 2020
  3. Primary completion22 Jun 2023
  4. Study completion22 Jun 2023

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
42 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04705649
Sponsor's protocol ID
TAPER
Acronym
TAPER
Status last verified
Aug 2023
First submitted
7 Jan 2021
Last updated
14 Aug 2023
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Treatment de-escalation in people with Endometrial Cancer, run by British Columbia Cancer Agency at 1 site in Canada.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 Aug 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Pelvic recurrence (time frame: every 6 months for the first 3 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 Aug 2023.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in