Endometrial CancerTAPERNCT04705649
Tailored Adjuvant Therapy in POLE-mutated and p53-wildtype Early Stage Endometrial Cancer
A study testing Treatment de-escalation in people with Endometrial Cancer, run by British Columbia Cancer Agency at 1 site in Canada.
Trial summary
Endometrial cancer(EC) is the 4th most common cancer in women globally. Clinicians struggle to determine 'the best' treatment for endometrial cancers as they are very hard to tell apart under the microscope. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Endometrial Cancer
- What is being tested?
- Treatment de-escalation
- How many people
- 42 participants
- Where
- 1 siteCanada
- Study dates
- 14 Jul 2020to 22 Jun 2023
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Histologically confirmed endometrial carcinoma, with one of the following combinations of FIGO stage, grade, and LVI: Stage IA (not confined to polyp), grade 3 (with or without LVI), pN0 Stage IB, grade 1, 2 pNx/N0 with or without LVI Stage IB, grade 3 without LVI pN0 Stage II (microscopic), grade 1 or 2, pN0 and without substantial LVI Surgery consisting of hysterectomy (total abdominal, laparoscopic or robotic-assisted) and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. Lymph node dissection can be performed as per institutional standards (sentinel or full lymphadenectomy). Pelvic LN assessment is required for grade 3 or stage II cancers. Para-aortic lymphadenectomy is not mandated.
- Age ≥18 years
- Eastern Cooperative Group (ECOG) performance status 0, 1 or 2.
- Ability to understand and willing to sign a written informed consent document.
Who cannot join
- Prior chemotherapy for endometrial cancer or previous pelvic radiation.
- History of another invasive malignancy, except for non-melanoma skin cancers or tumors curatively treated with no evidence of disease for ≥ 5 years
- Inability to be registered and receive treatment within 12 weeks of hysterectomy .
- Abnormal p53 (p53abn) and/or mismatch repair deficiency (MMRd) on immunohistochemistry without pathogenic POLE mutation.
- MELF (microcystic, elongated and fragmented (MELF)) pattern of invasion is excluded within p53wt/NSMP tumors, not POLEmut
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Endometrial cancer(EC) is the 4th most common cancer in women globally. Clinicians struggle to determine 'the best' treatment for endometrial cancers as they are very hard to tell apart under the microscope. Our BC team developed and validated a low-cost practical tool that can reliably distinguish ECs by molecular features. Molecular classification can inform women about the likelihood of their disease coming back as well as which treatments might work best for them or are not needed. Investigators are studying how this classifier can identify women at very low risk of disease recurrence in order to spare them toxic therapies.
Read the detailed description
Purpose:
This proposal will for the first time test the clinical utility of ProMisE in a pan-Canadian setting. Through molecular classification, Investigators are closer to providing consistent treatment to women with EC reducing disparities in care as might be observed according to geography/access to care, and/or racial differences. As the primary focus for this trial investigators will focus on identifying women investigators believe may be overtreated, working to avoid giving toxic therapies with consequential side effects of treatment as many women with EC may be cured by surgery alone. However, by performing molecular classification for all new ECs enrolled investigators will also be able to identify women who are at increased risk of recurrence or death from their disease based on molecular features and direct them to molecular-subtype-specific clinical trials. This will, investigators believe, reduce undertreatment (not identifying and treating women at high risk for recurrence) and will help select the best treatment according to an individuals tumor biology. In summary, the research proposed will assess the feasibility and impact of ProMisE-directed care within a rigorous clinical setting - fulfilling the last step in bringing molecular classification-driven care to women across the country with EC and ultimately improving outcomes for women with this disease.
Hypothesis:
There is a subgroup of early stage endometrial carcinomas that are at very low risk of pelvic recurrence and can be identified through molecular classification providing an opportunity to withhold or deescalate adjuvant therapy.
Objectives:
Primary Objective:
Determine if women with POLE-mutated or p53 wild type/NSMP early stage endometrial cancer who undergo surgery (hysterectomy, BSO, +/-LND)have a low risk (<5%) risk of pelvic (including vaginal) recurrence at 3 years with no or de-escalated adjuvant treatment.
Secondary Objectives:
- Determine recurrence-free survival.
- Determine overall survival.
- Determine sites of recurrence (vaginal, pelvic, distant).
- Determine health economic impact of molecular classification-tailored adjuvant therapy on the cost of treating endometrial cancer
- Determine the impact of molecular classification on patient Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS)
- Determine if variability in adjuvant treatment given to women with endometrial cancer is decreased by molecular classification-tailored adjuvant therapy as compared to current/historic standard of care.
Exploratory Objectives:
- Are there additional molecular parameters that further stratify risk of recurrence within POLE or p53wt ECs.
Other mutations are also on the Contextual Genomics FindIt™ panel and will be recorded for testing of prognostic or predictive value but will not be used to stratify care nor direct therapy in real time. Similarly L1CAM IHC on whole sections of representative tumor will be performed and tested for associations with outcomes. Additional analysis might include further IHC, proteomic, epigenetic assessment, and immune markers.Investigators will have the opportunity to weigh multiple molecular and clinicopathological parameters captured in data collection post hoc to see if any of these improve prognostic ability when applied with ProMisE.
Research design:
This is A single arm prospective cohort study is the most efficient trial design to address the primary hypothesis. Study investigators have experience with similar successful trials in other disease sites (breast-DUCHESS, LUMINA). Some components of this molecular based tool are now widely reported on standard of care pathology reports (MMRd, p53) making the possibility of creating a cohort blinded to these molecular results and thus randomization of this cohort impractical. With implications of these molecular features impacting HCP referrals, pathology categorization, and treatment opportunities (e.g., immune blockade) it is not appropriate to withhold these molecular results from patients. Randomization and creation of true blinded cohorts are therefore no longer feasible. Despite increasing availability of some of these molecular features in most cancer centers, POLE mutation testing has not routinely been available, and as yet there are no algorithms to direct management based upon molecular status thus practice variability is large. A prospective trial will get all components of the molecular classifier into the hands of clinicians and patients. Investigators have evidence-based publications supporting treatment recommendations herein, although taken from retrospective series or preclinical work. Investigators have a randomized controlled trial in molecular classification-driven care (PORTEC4a) that although not mature enough to be published has revealed no concerns for higher rates of adverse events in the observation-only arms that would threaten continuation. As clinicians are already beginning to factor molecular features into their management recommendations it is imperative that investigators measure the impact of implementation of molecular based triage in a controlled setting. This will enable us to have preassigned 'stop' mechanisms in place if higher than anticipated recurrence rates are note and has the potential to change future algorithms for care.
NB: This trial will be conducted in compliance with the protocol, GCP and all applicable regulatory requirements.
Statistical design:
Primary Endpoint:
The primary aim of this study is to provide reliable estimates of the 3-year cumulative incidence of pelvic recurrence, and to confirm that this probability is sufficiently low e.g. de-escalation or no adjuvant therapy is safe in molecular classification selected early stage ECs.
- Conditions
- Endometrial Cancer
- Being tested
- Treatment de-escalation
- Medical subject headings
- Endometrial Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Treatment de-escalationOther
De-escalation from standard treatment based on molecular profile
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Pelvic recurrence
recurrent disease in the pelvis (including the vagina)
Measured: every 6 months for the first 3 years
Secondary outcomes (5)
Recurrence free survival
duration of time from registration to time of relapse or death, whichever occurs first
Measured: every 6 months for the first 3 years
Overall survival
duration of time from registration to time of death from any cause.
Measured: every 6 months for the first 3 years
Sites of relapse
local (vagina), regional (pelvic and/or paraaortic nodal), or distant.
Measured: every 6 months for the first 3 years
Patient Decisional Conflict Scale
a validated tool reflecting patient decision making prior to and post intervention or new information
Measured: through study completion, an average of 3 years
Variation in treatment
proportion of cases enrolled where adjuvant treatment administered deviated from recommendations
Measured: through study completion, an average of 3 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted12 Jan 2021
- Study start14 Jul 2020
- Primary completion22 Jun 2023
- Study completion22 Jun 2023
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Endometrial CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by British Columbia Cancer AgencyThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 42 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- British Columbia Cancer Agency
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Jessica McAlpine, British Columbia Cancer Agency
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04705649
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- TAPER
- Acronym
- TAPER
- Status last verified
- Aug 2023
- First submitted
- 7 Jan 2021
- Last updated
- 14 Aug 2023
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 14 Aug 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Tailored Adjuvant Therapy in POLE-mutated and p53-wildtype Early Stage Endometrial Cancer
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04705649
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- TAPER / TAPER
- Conditions
- Endometrial Cancer
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 42 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- British Columbia Cancer AgencyUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 14 Jul 2020 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 22 Jun 2023 (actual)
- Study completion
- 22 Jun 2023 (actual)
- First posted
- 12 Jan 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Endometrial cancer(EC) is the 4th most common cancer in women globally. Clinicians struggle to determine 'the best' treatment for endometrial cancers as they are very hard to tell apart under the microscope. Our BC team developed and validated a low-cost practical tool that can reliably distinguish ECs by molecular features. Molecular classification can inform women about the likelihood of their disease coming back as well as which treatments might work best for them or are not needed. Investigators are studying how this classifier can identify women at very low risk of disease recurrence in order to spare them toxic therapies.
Detailed description
Purpose:
This proposal will for the first time test the clinical utility of ProMisE in a pan-Canadian setting. Through molecular classification, Investigators are closer to providing consistent treatment to women with EC reducing disparities in care as might be observed according to geography/access to care, and/or racial differences. As the primary focus for this trial investigators will focus on identifying women investigators believe may be overtreated, working to avoid giving toxic therapies with consequential side effects of treatment as many women with EC may be cured by surgery alone. However, by performing molecular classification for all new ECs enrolled investigators will also be able to identify women who are at increased risk of recurrence or death from their disease based on molecular features and direct them to molecular-subtype-specific clinical trials. This will, investigators believe, reduce undertreatment (not identifying and treating women at high risk for recurrence) and will help select the best treatment according to an individuals tumor biology. In summary, the research proposed will assess the feasibility and impact of ProMisE-directed care within a rigorous clinical setting - fulfilling the last step in bringing molecular classification-driven care to women across the country with EC and ultimately improving outcomes for women with this disease.
Hypothesis:
There is a subgroup of early stage endometrial carcinomas that are at very low risk of pelvic recurrence and can be identified through molecular classification providing an opportunity to withhold or deescalate adjuvant therapy.
Objectives:
Primary Objective:
Determine if women with POLE-mutated or p53 wild type/NSMP early stage endometrial cancer who undergo surgery (hysterectomy, BSO, +/-LND)have a low risk (<5%) risk of pelvic (including vaginal) recurrence at 3 years with no or de-escalated adjuvant treatment.
Secondary Objectives:
- Determine recurrence-free survival.
- Determine overall survival.
- Determine sites of recurrence (vaginal, pelvic, distant).
- Determine health economic impact of molecular classification-tailored adjuvant therapy on the cost of treating endometrial cancer
- Determine the impact of molecular classification on patient Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS)
- Determine if variability in adjuvant treatment given to women with endometrial cancer is decreased by molecular classification-tailored adjuvant therapy as compared to current/historic standard of care.
Exploratory Objectives:
- Are there additional molecular parameters that further stratify risk of recurrence within POLE or p53wt ECs.
Other mutations are also on the Contextual Genomics FindIt™ panel and will be recorded for testing of prognostic or predictive value but will not be used to stratify care nor direct therapy in real time. Similarly L1CAM IHC on whole sections of representative tumor will be performed and tested for associations with outcomes. Additional analysis might include further IHC, proteomic, epigenetic assessment, and immune markers.Investigators will have the opportunity to weigh multiple molecular and clinicopathological parameters captured in data collection post hoc to see if any of these improve prognostic ability when applied with ProMisE.
Research design:
This is A single arm prospective cohort study is the most efficient trial design to address the primary hypothesis. Study investigators have experience with similar successful trials in other disease sites (breast-DUCHESS, LUMINA). Some components of this molecular based tool are now widely reported on standard of care pathology reports (MMRd, p53) making the possibility of creating a cohort blinded to these molecular results and thus randomization of this cohort impractical. With implications of these molecular features impacting HCP referrals, pathology categorization, and treatment opportunities (e.g., immune blockade) it is not appropriate to withhold these molecular results from patients. Randomization and creation of true blinded cohorts are therefore no longer feasible. Despite increasing availability of some of these molecular features in most cancer centers, POLE mutation testing has not routinely been available, and as yet there are no algorithms to direct management based upon molecular status thus practice variability is large. A prospective trial will get all components of the molecular classifier into the hands of clinicians and patients. Investigators have evidence-based publications supporting treatment recommendations herein, although taken from retrospective series or preclinical work. Investigators have a randomized controlled trial in molecular classification-driven care (PORTEC4a) that although not mature enough to be published has revealed no concerns for higher rates of adverse events in the observation-only arms that would threaten continuation. As clinicians are already beginning to factor molecular features into their management recommendations it is imperative that investigators measure the impact of implementation of molecular based triage in a controlled setting. This will enable us to have preassigned 'stop' mechanisms in place if higher than anticipated recurrence rates are note and has the potential to change future algorithms for care.
NB: This trial will be conducted in compliance with the protocol, GCP and all applicable regulatory requirements.
Statistical design:
Primary Endpoint:
The primary aim of this study is to provide reliable estimates of the 3-year cumulative incidence of pelvic recurrence, and to confirm that this probability is sufficiently low e.g. de-escalation or no adjuvant therapy is safe in molecular classification selected early stage ECs.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Histologically confirmed endometrial carcinoma, with one of the following combinations of FIGO stage, grade, and LVI: Stage IA (not confined to polyp), grade 3 (with or without LVI), pN0 Stage IB, grade 1, 2 pNx/N0 with or without LVI Stage IB, grade 3 without LVI pN0 Stage II (microscopic), grade 1 or 2, pN0 and without substantial LVI Surgery consisting of hysterectomy (total abdominal, laparoscopic or robotic-assisted) and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. Lymph node dissection can be performed as per institutional standards (sentinel or full lymphadenectomy). Pelvic LN assessment is required for grade 3 or stage II cancers. Para-aortic lymphadenectomy is not mandated.
- Age ≥18 years
- Eastern Cooperative Group (ECOG) performance status 0, 1 or 2.
- Ability to understand and willing to sign a written informed consent document.
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Prior chemotherapy for endometrial cancer or previous pelvic radiation.
- History of another invasive malignancy, except for non-melanoma skin cancers or tumors curatively treated with no evidence of disease for ≥ 5 years
- Inability to be registered and receive treatment within 12 weeks of hysterectomy .
- Abnormal p53 (p53abn) and/or mismatch repair deficiency (MMRd) on immunohistochemistry without pathogenic POLE mutation.
- MELF (microcystic, elongated and fragmented (MELF)) pattern of invasion is excluded within p53wt/NSMP tumors, not POLEmut
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Treatment de-escalationDe-escalation from standard treatment based on molecular profile | Other | – |
Primary outcome
Pelvic recurrence
Time frame: every 6 months for the first 3 years
recurrent disease in the pelvis (including the vagina)
5 secondary outcomes
Recurrence free survival
Time frame: every 6 months for the first 3 years
Overall survival
Time frame: every 6 months for the first 3 years
Sites of relapse
Time frame: every 6 months for the first 3 years
Patient Decisional Conflict Scale
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 3 years
Variation in treatment
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 3 years
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 14 Aug 2023.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Endometrial Cancer
Recruiting
Methylation Profiling in Self-Samples for Identification of (Epi)Genetic Biomarkers for Gynecological Cancers
Gynaecological Cancers, Ovarian Cancer
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
Endometrial Cancer Patientes MMR Deficient Comparing Chemotherapy vs Dostarlimab in First Line
Endometrial Cancer
RecruitingPhase 3
Testing the Addition of an Antiangiogenic Drug (Bevacizumab) to Chemotherapy (Carboplatin and Paclitaxel) Combined With Immunotherapy (Pembrolizumab) for pMMR, TP53 Mutated Endometrial Cancer
Advanced Endometrial Carcinoma, Recurrent Endometrial Carcinoma
RecruitingPhase 2
At-Home Cancer Directed Therapy Versus in Clinic for the Treatment of Patients With Advanced Cancer
Advanced Anal Carcinoma, Advanced Biliary Tract Carcinoma
RecruitingPhase 3
Impact of Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping on Patient Reported Lower Extremity Limb Dysfunction in Stage I Endometrial Cancer
Stage I Uterine Corpus Carcinoma or Carcinosarcoma AJCC v8
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Treatment de-escalation in people with Endometrial Cancer, run by British Columbia Cancer Agency at 1 site in Canada.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 Aug 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Pelvic recurrence (time frame: every 6 months for the first 3 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 Aug 2023.