Diabetes MellitusNCT04706377
Vitamin B12 Supplementation in Diabetic Neuropathy
A study testing B12 fix 1000mcg in people with Diabetes Mellitus and Diabetic Neuropathies, run by Aristotle University Of Thessaloniki at 1 site in Greece.
Trial summary
This prospective double-blind placebo-controlled trial aims to investigate the safety and efficacy of oral dispersible tablet of vitamin B12 for 1 year, in 90 patients with diabetes mellitus type 2 and neuropathy. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Diabetes Mellitus, Diabetic Neuropathies, Diabetic Complication
- What is being tested?
- B12 fix 1000mcg
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 90 participants
- Where
- 1 siteGreece
- Study dates
- 1 Feb 2018to 28 Feb 2020
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- adults (>18 years old) with Diabetes Mellitus 2
- established Diabetic neuropathy, both peripheral and autonomic (Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy and Diabetic Autonomic Neuropathy). (Diagnosis was made with a)two or more Cardiovascular Autonomic Reflex Tests abnormal, b)abnormal nerve conduction velocity, c)abnormal Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument Questionnaire and Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument Examination ).
- good glycemic control (HbA1c between 6.5 and 7.5 %), stable in the last year before participating in the study
- metformin treatment for at least 4 years
- low vitamin B12 levels according to suggested normal values for DM2 patients over 60 years old (<400 pmol/L)
Who cannot join
- pernicious anemia,
- alcoholism
- gastrectomy
- gastric bypass surgery
- pancreatic insufficiency
- malabsorption syndromes
Show all 12Show fewer
- chronic giardiasis
- acute infection in the last 6 months
- cardiovascular event in the last 6 months
- surgery involving small intestine or Human Immunodeficiency Virus infection.
- Patients with estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate <50 mL/min/1.73m2
- taking multivitamins or B12 supplements in the last 12 months
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Greece1 site
University General Hospital AHEPA
Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, 54621
About this study
Official title: Vitamin B12 Supplementation in Diabetic Neuropathy :1-year Double Blind Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial
This prospective double-blind placebo-controlled trial aims to investigate the safety and efficacy of oral dispersible tablet of vitamin B12 for 1 year, in 90 patients with diabetes mellitus type 2 and neuropathy.
Read the detailed description
In this prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, 90 patients with type 2 diabetes on metformin treatment for at least four years, and both peripheral and autonomic diabetic neuropathy were randomized to an active treatment group (n=44) receiving B12, and a control group (n=46) receiving placebo. All patients had B12 levels less than 400 pmol/L. Subjects underwent measurement of sural nerve conduction velocity and amplitude, vibration perception threshold, and performed cardiovascular autonomic reflex tests (CARTs: Mean Circular Resultant, Valsalva test, postural index and orthostatic hypotension]). Sudomotor function was assessed with the SUDOSCAN that measures electrochemical skin conductance in hands and feet. The Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument Questionnaire and Examination and questionnaires to evaluate quality of life and level of pain were also used.
- Being tested
- B12 fix 1000mcg, Placebo
- Keywords
- diabetic neuropathy, vitamin B12, SUDOSCAN, metformin, diabetic foot, Diabetes Mellitus, autonomic neuropathy, peripheral neuropathy, painful neuropathy
- Medical subject headings
- Diabetes Mellitus, Diabetic Neuropathies, Diabetes Complications, Diabetic Foot, Peripheral Nervous System Diseases, Neuropathy, Painful
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
B12 fix 1000mcgDietary supplement
Also called vitamin B12
oral dispersible tablet with vitamin B12 1000mcg
PlaceboOther
Placebo tablet
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Active treatment group | Active comparator | Patients were given oral dispersible tablet with 1000μg of vitamin B12 daily for 12 months. Receives: Dietary Supplement: B12 fix 1000mcg |
| Placebo group | Placebo comparator | Patients were given placebo tablet similar to the tablet given to the active group once a day for 12 months. Receives: Other: Placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in Sural Nerve Function measured by conduction velocity
Sural Nerve conduction velocity measured as m/s
Measured: 12 months
Change in Sural Nerve Function measured by amplitude
Sural Nerve conduction amplitude measured as μV
Measured: 12 months
Change in Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument Questionnaire
Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument questionnaire (The Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument (MNSI) includes two separate assessments, a 15-item self-administered questionnaire and a lower extremity examination. the questionnaire is scored by summing abnormal responses. Responses are added to obtain a total score. 'Yes' responses to questions 1-3, 5-6, 8-9, 11-12, 14-15 are each counted as one point. 'No' responses to questions 7 and 13 each count as one point. Question 4 was considered to be a measure of impaired circulation and question 10 a measure of general asthenia and were not included in the published scoring algorithm. A score of ≥ 7 was considered abnormal.
Measured: 12 months
Change in Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument Examination
Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument Examination (The Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument (MNSI) includes two separate assessments, a 15-item self-administered questionnaire that is scored by summing abnormal responses, and a lower extremity examination that includes inspection and assessment of vibratory sensation and ankle reflexes and is scored by assigning points for abnormal findings.A score ≥ 2 was considered abnormal. Abnormality in each item is graded between 0.5 and 1 and at least more than 2 abnormal items are needed to reach the score of neuropathy. )
Measured: 12 months
Change in Electrochemical Skin Conductance
Electrochemical Skin Conductance in hands and feet measured by SUDOSCAN
Measured: 12 months
Change in Cardiovascular Autonomic Reflex Tests (CARTs)
CARTs were performed with Autonomic Nervous System Reader and included R-R variation during deep breathing [Mean Circular Resultant , Valsalva maneuver , 30:15 ratio expressed as postural index, and blood pressure response to standing (orthostatic hypotension)
Measured: 12 months
Change in Vibration perception threshold
Vibration perception threshold was measured using a Biothesiometer
Measured: 12 months
Change in level of pain with painDETECT questionnaire
painDETECT questionnaire consists of seven questions that address the quality of neuropathic pain symptoms; it is completed by the patient and no physical examination is required. The first five questions ask about the gradation of pain, scored from 0 to 5 (never = 0, hardly noticed = 1, slightly = 2; moderately = 3, strongly = 4, very strongly = 5). Question 6 asks about the pain course pattern, scored from -1 to 2, depending on which pain course pattern diagram is selected. The final score between -1 and 38, indicates the likelihood of a neuropathic pain component. A score of ≤ 12 indicates that pain is unlikely to have a neuropathic component (< 15%), while a score of ≥ 19 suggests that pain is likely to have a neuropathic component (> 90%). A score between these values indicates that the result is uncertain and a more detailed examination is required.
Measured: 12 months
Change in quality of life score
Diabetes Quality of Life Brief Clinical Inventory (ThE DQOL questionnaire we used is a 15-items, brief-focused version of the Diabetes Quality of Life (DQOL) questionnaire developed in the DCCT and lowest score means worse quality of life whereas higher values indicate better quality of life)
Measured: 12 months
serum vitamin B12 levels
serum vitamin B12 levels
Measured: 12 months
Secondary outcomes (1)
Adverse events
report of any adverse events
Measured: 12 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted12 Jan 2021
- Study start1 Feb 2018
- Primary completion28 Feb 2020
- Study completion28 Feb 2020
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Diabetes MellitusStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Aristotle University Of ThessalonikiThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Double Blind Placebo Controlled Randomized Clinical Trial
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 90 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Aristotle University Of Thessaloniki
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University of Sheffield, University Hospital Tuebingen
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Prof. Triantafyllos Didangelos, Aristotle University Of Thessaloniki
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04706377
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- No42439
- Status last verified
- Jan 2021
- First submitted
- 9 Jan 2021
- Last updated
- 12 Jan 2021
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 12 Jan 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Vitamin B12 Supplementation in Diabetic Neuropathy :1-year Double Blind Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04706377
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- No42439
- Keywords
- diabetic neuropathy, vitamin B12, SUDOSCAN, metformin, diabetic foot, Diabetes Mellitus, autonomic neuropathy, peripheral neuropathy
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 90 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Aristotle University Of ThessalonikiUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University of Sheffield, University Hospital Tuebingen
- Study start
- 1 Feb 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 28 Feb 2020 (actual)
- Study completion
- 28 Feb 2020 (actual)
- First posted
- 12 Jan 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This prospective double-blind placebo-controlled trial aims to investigate the safety and efficacy of oral dispersible tablet of vitamin B12 for 1 year, in 90 patients with diabetes mellitus type 2 and neuropathy.
Detailed description
In this prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, 90 patients with type 2 diabetes on metformin treatment for at least four years, and both peripheral and autonomic diabetic neuropathy were randomized to an active treatment group (n=44) receiving B12, and a control group (n=46) receiving placebo. All patients had B12 levels less than 400 pmol/L. Subjects underwent measurement of sural nerve conduction velocity and amplitude, vibration perception threshold, and performed cardiovascular autonomic reflex tests (CARTs: Mean Circular Resultant, Valsalva test, postural index and orthostatic hypotension]). Sudomotor function was assessed with the SUDOSCAN that measures electrochemical skin conductance in hands and feet. The Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument Questionnaire and Examination and questionnaires to evaluate quality of life and level of pain were also used.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Double Blind Placebo Controlled Randomized Clinical Trial
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Active treatment group | Active comparator | Dietary Supplement: B12 fix 1000mcgPatients were given oral dispersible tablet with 1000μg of vitamin B12 daily for 12 months. |
| Placebo group | Placebo comparator | Other: PlaceboPatients were given placebo tablet similar to the tablet given to the active group once a day for 12 months. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- adults (>18 years old) with Diabetes Mellitus 2
- established Diabetic neuropathy, both peripheral and autonomic (Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy and Diabetic Autonomic Neuropathy). (Diagnosis was made with a)two or more Cardiovascular Autonomic Reflex Tests abnormal, b)abnormal nerve conduction velocity, c)abnormal Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument Questionnaire and Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument Examination ).
- good glycemic control (HbA1c between 6.5 and 7.5 %), stable in the last year before participating in the study
- metformin treatment for at least 4 years
- low vitamin B12 levels according to suggested normal values for DM2 patients over 60 years old (<400 pmol/L)
Key exclusion criteria (12 listed)
- pernicious anemia,
- alcoholism
- gastrectomy
- gastric bypass surgery
- pancreatic insufficiency
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| B12 fix 1000mcgAlso: vitamin B12oral dispersible tablet with vitamin B12 1000mcg | Dietary supplement | Active treatment group |
| PlaceboPlacebo tablet | Other | Placebo group |
Primary outcome
Change in Sural Nerve Function measured by conduction velocity
Time frame: 12 months
Sural Nerve conduction velocity measured as m/s
Change in Sural Nerve Function measured by amplitude
Time frame: 12 months
Sural Nerve conduction amplitude measured as μV
Change in Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument Questionnaire
Time frame: 12 months
Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument questionnaire (The Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument (MNSI) includes two separate assessments, a 15-item self-administered questionnaire and a lower extremity examination. the questionnaire is scored by summing abnormal responses. Responses are added to obtain a total score. 'Yes' responses to questions 1-3, 5-6, 8-9, 11-12, 14-15 are each counted as one point. 'No' responses to questions 7 and 13 each count as one point. Question 4 was considered to be a measure of impaired circulation and question 10 a measure of general asthenia and were not included in the published scoring algorithm. A score of ≥ 7 was considered abnormal.
Change in Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument Examination
Time frame: 12 months
Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument Examination (The Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument (MNSI) includes two separate assessments, a 15-item self-administered questionnaire that is scored by summing abnormal responses, and a lower extremity examination that includes inspection and assessment of vibratory sensation and ankle reflexes and is scored by assigning points for abnormal findings.A score ≥ 2 was considered abnormal. Abnormality in each item is graded between 0.5 and 1 and at least more than 2 abnormal items are needed to reach the score of neuropathy. )
Change in Electrochemical Skin Conductance
Time frame: 12 months
Electrochemical Skin Conductance in hands and feet measured by SUDOSCAN
Change in Cardiovascular Autonomic Reflex Tests (CARTs)
Time frame: 12 months
CARTs were performed with Autonomic Nervous System Reader and included R-R variation during deep breathing [Mean Circular Resultant , Valsalva maneuver , 30:15 ratio expressed as postural index, and blood pressure response to standing (orthostatic hypotension)
Change in Vibration perception threshold
Time frame: 12 months
Vibration perception threshold was measured using a Biothesiometer
Change in level of pain with painDETECT questionnaire
Time frame: 12 months
painDETECT questionnaire consists of seven questions that address the quality of neuropathic pain symptoms; it is completed by the patient and no physical examination is required. The first five questions ask about the gradation of pain, scored from 0 to 5 (never = 0, hardly noticed = 1, slightly = 2; moderately = 3, strongly = 4, very strongly = 5). Question 6 asks about the pain course pattern, scored from -1 to 2, depending on which pain course pattern diagram is selected. The final score between -1 and 38, indicates the likelihood of a neuropathic pain component. A score of ≤ 12 indicates that pain is unlikely to have a neuropathic component (< 15%), while a score of ≥ 19 suggests that pain is likely to have a neuropathic component (> 90%). A score between these values indicates that the result is uncertain and a more detailed examination is required.
Change in quality of life score
Time frame: 12 months
Diabetes Quality of Life Brief Clinical Inventory (ThE DQOL questionnaire we used is a 15-items, brief-focused version of the Diabetes Quality of Life (DQOL) questionnaire developed in the DCCT and lowest score means worse quality of life whereas higher values indicate better quality of life)
serum vitamin B12 levels
Time frame: 12 months
serum vitamin B12 levels
1 secondary outcome
Adverse events
Time frame: 12 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 12 Jan 2021.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Diabetes Mellitus
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
Efficacy and Safety of Once-Weekly SHR-3167 Compared With Once-Daily Insulin Glargine in Adults With Insulin-Naive Type 2 Diabetes
Type 2 Diabetes
Active, not recruiting
Digital Reinforcement of Motivational Interviewing Micro-Skills Among Primary Care Healthcare Professionals
Hypertension (Without Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus)
Recruiting
Effects of Lean Pork Loin Intake on Protein Homeostasis and Glucose Regulation in Prediabetic Adults
Hyperglycaemia (Non Diabetic), Prediabetes
Recruiting
PAW-Hydrogel for Chronic Wound Healing
Diabetic Foot Ulcer (DFU), Pressure Ulcer (PU)
Recruiting
Investigating Vascular Properties of HEMI and SPG Signals in Individuals With or at Risk for Chronic Kidney Disease
Chronic Kidney Disease, Hypertension (HTN)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing B12 fix 1000mcg in people with Diabetes Mellitus and Diabetic Neuropathies, run by Aristotle University Of Thessaloniki at 1 site in Greece.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 12 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 Jan 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Greece. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in Sural Nerve Function measured by conduction velocity (time frame: 12 months). The study lists 10 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 Jan 2021.