Atopic DermatitisNCT04706559
Efficacy of Oral Supplementation of Probiotics in Children With Atopic Dermatitis
A study testing Probiotic sachet containing mixture of four strains i.e.Lactobacillus rhamnosus, Lactobacillus acidophilus, Bifidobacterium longum, and Saccharomyces boulardii and Conventional treatment in people with Atopic Dermatitis, run by B.P. Koirala Institute of Health Sciences at 1 site in Nepal.
Trial summary
Various clinical studies have evaluated the role of probiotics in children with atopic dermatitis, with some studies showing improvement in clinical outcome after supplementation of probiotics and others showing no additional benefit. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 4 to 17 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Atopic Dermatitis
- What is being tested?
- Probiotic sachet containing mixture of four strains i.e.Lactobacillus rhamnosus, Lactobacillus acidophilus, Bifidobacterium longum, and Saccharomyces boulardii and Conventional treatment
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 98 participants
- Where
- 1 siteNepal
- Study dates
- 3 Jan 2021to 15 Dec 2021
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 4 to 17 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child
Who may be able to join
- Children with a diagnosis of atopic dermatitis that meet Hanifin and Rajka criteria
- SCORAD ( SCORing Atopic Dermatitis) index 15- 50 at the time of enrollment
Who cannot join
- SCORAD (SCORing Atopic Dermatitis) index <15 or >50.
- Children treated with systemic corticosteroids, methotrexate, or cyclosporine in the previous 3 months and antibiotics in the previous 2 weeks.
- Immunocompromised children.
- Concomitant diagnosis of intolerance to gluten and/ or lactose.
- Pre-existing hypersensitivity to components contained in the probiotics.
- Children suffering from chronic infectious diseases.
Show all 9Show fewer
- A child with other known systemic diseases (heart, liver or kidney diseases).
- Known case of short gut syndrome.
- Refusal of children's parents to participate in the study.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Various clinical studies have evaluated the role of probiotics in children with atopic dermatitis, with some studies showing improvement in clinical outcome after supplementation of probiotics and others showing no additional benefit. This study is to provide clinical evidence of effect of a mixture of probiotics in Atopic Dermatitis (AD) patients based on improvement in SCORAD (SCORing Atopic Dermatitis) index.
Read the detailed description
Atopic dermatitis (AD) is the common chronic inflammatory skin disease with relapsing courses that often start in infancy and childhood. It is characterized by erythema, itchy papules, occasionally vesicles (in infants), which may become excoriated and lichenified and have a typical flexural distribution. Atopy is defined as a "personal or familial tendency to produce immunoglobulin antibodies in response to even low doses of allergen, and associated with development of AD, asthma and rhinoconjunctivitis.The worldwide prevalence of AD is estimated to be 20% in children and 2-10% in adults. The incidence of AD has increased by 2 to 3 folds in past 3 decades in the industrialized countries and represents a major public health burden. According to the International Study of Asthma and Allergies in Childhood (ISAAC) phase 3, the prevalence of AD among the age group of 13 to 14 in Africa and Latin America was at 12-14% and 6-10% respectively. The Asian Pacific countries, the Eastern Mediterranean region and the Indian subcontinent, it was 3-6% among the same age groups (13-14 years). Whereas among 6 to 7 years children, for Asian Pacific countries, Africa and Latin America the prevalence of AD was around 10% and in Indian subcontinent and Eastern Mediterranean region, value was lower at 3-5%
In Nepal the frequency of AD in all age group was 2% as per a year hospital based study done by Singh S and Agrawal S et.al in 2012. (Unpublished data, on personal communication)
The pathogenesis of AD appears to result from interaction between various genetic and environmental factors. It is associated with skin barrier dysfunction and immune dysregulation. The barrier dysfunction is early feature of AD which may be a primary but may also be a secondary to skin inflammation. Lack of exposure to microbial stimuli in early life programs the immune system towards Th2-type allergic response as described by 'hygiene hypothesis'.In allergic disorders there is shift of the Th1/Th2 cytokine balance towards a Th2 response, and causes the release of Interleukin-4, interleukin-5 and interleukin-13 as well as Immunoglobulin E production.
The diagnosis of AD is mainly clinical as there is no specific test for AD. Diagnosis of AD is based on specific a criterion which includes patient's history, clinical presentations as well as family history. In 1980 Hanifin and Rajka proposed major and minor diagnostic criteria based on clinical symptoms of AD. Williams coordinated a UK working party to attempt to simplify and refine the criteria given by Hanifin and Rajka in 1994. Severity of disease is evaluated by using widely accepted SCORing Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD), based on extent of area involved, severity of symptoms and intensity of the subjective symptoms of pruritus and sleep disturbances.The chronic and recurrent nature of AD negatively impacts the quality of life (QOL) of patients as well as their family members. The symptoms of AD limit patient's physical, psychosocial development and quality of sleep.
The main goals of treatment are to improve the skin barrier function and hydration, to suppress inflammation and to control microbial colonization. It can be achieved through emollients, topical corticosteroids and topical calcineurin inhibitor like tacrolimus. Oral drugs like corticosteroids, methotrexate and cyclosporine are reserved for severe cases.
Probiotics are defined by World Health Orgnization as "live microorganisms, which when consumed in adequate amounts, confer a health effect on the host."Under the hypothesis that probiotics have global allergy protective effect, they have been extensively used for several conditions like inflammatory bowel disease, bronchial asthma and other allergic diseases. If children who are genetically predisposed to AD are supplemented with probiotics early in their life, series of events like antigenic competition, immune regulation and stimulation of innate immunity will occur, all of which might minimize their susceptibility to allergic disorders. Hence, investigators planned this study to see its role in AD.
Statement of problem and rationale:
The rationale for this therapeutic option is based on well-established effects of bacteria on cellular immune responses. The probiotics has an immunomodulatory property that plays an essential role in the development of normal immune tolerance. Early life exposure to these microbial agents plays an important role in maturation of Type 1 helper cell (Th1) immune responses and could inhibit development of allergic Type 2 helper cell (Th2) responses and IgE antibody production. Therefore the onset of AD could be prevented by probiotics and this treatment strategy could also be effective even when AD is already established.
In a meta-analysis conducted in 2017, involving 13 randomized controlled trials (RCT) with 1,070 children, significant difference in SCORAD values favoring probiotics over the control group was observed. Though, a high degree of heterogeneity was observed across these 13 trials.
Cochrane review, 2018 which included 39 RCTs found that probiotic treatment may slightly reduce SCORAD value. However the researcher concluded that the differences were not clinically significant. Recent review in 2019 on "prebiotics and probiotics in atopic dermatitis" based on various RCT and meta-analysis support the supplementation of probiotics for at least 8 weeks in improving severity score of AD.
Investigators have observed conflicting results of different studies with some showing significant advantages while some studies revealing no benefit. Almost all of the studies have suggested further research in different populations. Therefore, we are conducting this study to find out the effect of probiotics in AD in our institute.
OBJECTIVES
- Primary objective: To investigate the efficacy of oral probiotics in the clinical outcome of Atopic dermatitis based on the SCORAD index
- Secondary objectives: To find out the total duration of topical corticosteroid use in the interventional and conventional group.
To assess the impact of AD in children's family members based on FDLQI (Family Dermatology Life Quality Index)
MATERIALS AND METHODS Type of study design: Assessor blinded, randomized controlled trial. Setting: Hospital (Dermatology Outpatient Department, BPKIHS, Dharan). The probable duration of the study will be one year after approval from the Institutional Review Committee and Nepal Health Research Council (NHRC). Ethical Clearance: taken from the Institutional Review Committee (IRC), BPKIHS, and Nepal Health Research Council (NHRC).
Calculation of the sample size: According to a study done by Ekaputri et.al, it is reported that mean± SD of SCORAD index after intervention in probiotic group and control group was (18.09 ± 8.59) and (23.21± 8.71) respectively. Considering the least difference, 5.12 and pooled SD- 8.65, the sample size has been calculated at 95% CI and 80% power, using two means formula.
n = 44.56, adding 10% in calculated value for lost to follow-up, final sample size is 45 in each group. Thus a total of 98 patients will be enrolled.
n = 2σ2 (Z α/2 + Z β) 2 (μ1- μ2) 2
n= sample size of each group. σ = standard deviation 8.65 Z = reliability coefficient. 1.96 α = significance level. 0.05 Zβ= at 20% power 0.84 μ1 = mean (Probiotic) 18.09 μ2 = mean (Control) 23.21 d = mean difference 5.12
Randomization and allocation concealment:
A block randomization list will be generated with the block sizes 4, 6 and 8. Two parallel groups (1:1 ratio) of patients following computerized randomization will be produced. Prior to the enrollment of the patients a sequentially generated number with the treatment group will be written in sealed envelope, which will be prepared by independent dermatologist.
Interventional and conventional groups:
Interventional group: Children with AD meeting eligibility criteria receiving probiotics and conventional treatment (topical corticosteroid, topical tacrolimus, an oral antihistamine and emollients) Conventional group: Children with AD meeting eligibility criteria, under conventional treatment only.
Follow up:
Each patient will be asked for their follow up at 2, 4, 6, 8, 10 and 12 weeks of commencing treatment. In each follow up, every patient will be evaluated for the side effects and compliance to treatment. SCORAD index will be measured at baseline and at 4, 8, 10 and 12 weeks. FDLQI will be measured at baseline and at 8 weeks. Parents will be provided a card to record for flare of symptoms; total days of steroid use for the same and total flare episode will be recorded during 12 weeks follow up. Flare is defined as worsening of clinical features leading to use of corticosteroids for at least 3 consecutive days.
Family dermatology life quality index:
Parents or guardian of each children will be asked to fill the questionnaire intended to measure quality of life of family members whose relative have dermatological conditions. The standardized nepali version of FDLQI (MKA Basra, AY Finlay. Cardiff University 2005) will be used. Questions concern the influence of disease on parents QOL in the last month. Each question can be answered by selecting 1 out of 4 answers scored 0-3. The maximum score is 30 points and minimum 0 point. The higher the score lower the parents QOL.
Severity Index (SCORAD) It uses the rule of nine to assess extent of disease and evaluates five clinical characteristics to determine disease severity: i) erythema, ii) edema/ papulation, iii) oozing/crusts, iv) excoriation and v) lichenification. It also assesses subjective symptoms of pruritus and sleep loss with Visual Analogue Scales (VAS).
Based on SCORAD score, AD is categorized as
- Mild AD (SCORAD <25)
- Moderate (SCORAD 25-50)
- Severe (SCORAD >50)
Statistical Analysis:
Statistical analysis will be conducted both per protocol and intention to treat population (defined as all enrolled children to whom study drug will be given; with the last observation carried forward) basis using two sided tests.
Statistical methods proposed:
- Descriptive statistics will be summarized as mean, median, percentage, standard deviation (SD) and interquartile range along with appropriate graphical and tabular presentation.
- Intragroup SCORAD index and FDLQI score will be compared by paired t-test and between the groups by independent t- test.
- In case of nonparametric data Mann- Whitney U test for independent groups and Wilcoxon signed- rank test for paired group will be used.
- Chi-square test will be used to compare the categorical data. All statistical tests will be carried out at a significance level P<0.05.
- Conditions
- Atopic Dermatitis
- Being tested
- Probiotic sachet containing mixture of four strains i.e.Lactobacillus rhamnosus, Lactobacillus acidophilus, Bifidobacterium longum, and Saccharomyces boulardii, Conventional treatment
- Medical subject headings
- Dermatitis, Atopic
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Probiotic sachet containing mixture of four strains i.e.Lactobacillus rhamnosus, Lactobacillus acidophilus, Bifidobacterium longum, and Saccharomyces boulardiiDrug
Interventional group: Children with AD meeting eligibility criteria receiving probiotics and conventional treatment (topical corticosteroid, topical tacrolimus, an oral antihistamine and emollients).
Conventional treatmentDrug
topical corticosteroid, topical tacrolimus, an oral antihistamine and emollients as per atopic dermatitis treatment guidelines.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Group A (Interventional group) | Experimental | Along with below mentioned conventional treatment, the participants in group A (i.e. Interventional group) will receive conventional treatment of AD for a short duration along with probiotics for 8 weeks. One probiotic sachet twice a day will be prescribed. A sachet of 2 grams containing 1.25 billion cells per gram of 4 strains (Lactobacillus rhamnosus, Lactobacillus acidophilus, Bifidobacterium longum, and Saccharomyces boulardii) will be used. The child will receive a total of 5 billion cells of probiotics per day. Receives: Drug: Probiotic sachet containing mixture of four strains i.e.Lactobacillus rhamnosus, Lactobacillus acidophilus, Bifidobacterium longum, and Saccharomyces boulardii; Drug: Conventional treatment |
| Group B (Conventional group) | Active comparator | All patients (i.e. in both arms) with atopic dermatitis will be prescribed emollients and cleanser as a part of routine skin care. Topical corticosteroid (i.e. Fluticasone 0.05% cream) and topical calcineurin inhibitor (tacrolimus 0.1% ointment) for sensitive areas like periorbital regions, flexures and face, will be given once daily. All patients will be given an oral antihistamine (syrup/ tablet cetirizine 0.3mg/kg) at night. It is referred to as conventional treatment. Receives: Drug: Conventional treatment |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Number of participants in each sex group
Sex distribution of Atopic Dermatitis patients in male, female or others group
Measured: At the time of enrollment
Duration
Duration of Atopic Dermatitis
Measured: At the time of enrollment
History Of Atopy
Personal or Family history of atopy
Measured: Enrollment
Change in SCORing Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) index
Based on three aspects, extent of disease, disease severity and subjective symptoms combine to give a maximum possible score of 103.
Measured: Enrollment, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 10 weeks and 12 weeks of treatment
Secondary outcomes (4)
Number of participants having each of systemic illnesses
Systemic diseases like heart, liver and kidney diseases
Measured: Enrollment
Number of participants who had taken past treatment
Different types of treatment received -either medicinal or traditional
Measured: Enrollment
Age of Onset
Age of onset of Atopic Dermatitis
Measured: Enrollment
Change in Family Dermatology Life Quality Index
It will be measured using a standard Nepali version of Family Dermatology Life Quality Index questionnaire. Questions concern the influence of disease on parents QOL in the last month. Each question can be answered by selecting 1 out of 4 answers scored 0-3. The maximum score is 30 points and minimum 0 point. The higher the score lower the parents Quality of Life.
Measured: At the time of enrollment and at 8 weeks of commencing treatment.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted13 Jan 2021
- Study start3 Jan 2021
- Primary completion30 Sep 2021
- Study completion15 Dec 2021
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Atopic DermatitisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Assessor blinded, randomized controlled trial.
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 98 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- B.P. Koirala Institute of Health Sciences
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Nepal Health Research Council
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Kamala Acharya, B.P. Koirala Institute of Health Sciences
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04706559
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- IRC/1886/020
- Other IDs
- 720/2020 MT
- Status last verified
- Dec 2020
- First submitted
- 4 Jan 2021
- Last updated
- 16 Dec 2021
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 16 Dec 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Efficacy of Oral Supplementation of Probiotics in Children With Atopic Dermatitis
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04706559
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- IRC/1886/020
- Conditions
- Atopic Dermatitis
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 98 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- B.P. Koirala Institute of Health SciencesUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Nepal Health Research Council
- Study start
- 3 Jan 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Sep 2021 (actual)
- Study completion
- 15 Dec 2021 (actual)
- First posted
- 13 Jan 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Various clinical studies have evaluated the role of probiotics in children with atopic dermatitis, with some studies showing improvement in clinical outcome after supplementation of probiotics and others showing no additional benefit. This study is to provide clinical evidence of effect of a mixture of probiotics in Atopic Dermatitis (AD) patients based on improvement in SCORAD (SCORing Atopic Dermatitis) index.
Detailed description
Atopic dermatitis (AD) is the common chronic inflammatory skin disease with relapsing courses that often start in infancy and childhood. It is characterized by erythema, itchy papules, occasionally vesicles (in infants), which may become excoriated and lichenified and have a typical flexural distribution. Atopy is defined as a "personal or familial tendency to produce immunoglobulin antibodies in response to even low doses of allergen, and associated with development of AD, asthma and rhinoconjunctivitis.The worldwide prevalence of AD is estimated to be 20% in children and 2-10% in adults. The incidence of AD has increased by 2 to 3 folds in past 3 decades in the industrialized countries and represents a major public health burden. According to the International Study of Asthma and Allergies in Childhood (ISAAC) phase 3, the prevalence of AD among the age group of 13 to 14 in Africa and Latin America was at 12-14% and 6-10% respectively. The Asian Pacific countries, the Eastern Mediterranean region and the Indian subcontinent, it was 3-6% among the same age groups (13-14 years). Whereas among 6 to 7 years children, for Asian Pacific countries, Africa and Latin America the prevalence of AD was around 10% and in Indian subcontinent and Eastern Mediterranean region, value was lower at 3-5%
In Nepal the frequency of AD in all age group was 2% as per a year hospital based study done by Singh S and Agrawal S et.al in 2012. (Unpublished data, on personal communication)
The pathogenesis of AD appears to result from interaction between various genetic and environmental factors. It is associated with skin barrier dysfunction and immune dysregulation. The barrier dysfunction is early feature of AD which may be a primary but may also be a secondary to skin inflammation. Lack of exposure to microbial stimuli in early life programs the immune system towards Th2-type allergic response as described by 'hygiene hypothesis'.In allergic disorders there is shift of the Th1/Th2 cytokine balance towards a Th2 response, and causes the release of Interleukin-4, interleukin-5 and interleukin-13 as well as Immunoglobulin E production.
The diagnosis of AD is mainly clinical as there is no specific test for AD. Diagnosis of AD is based on specific a criterion which includes patient's history, clinical presentations as well as family history. In 1980 Hanifin and Rajka proposed major and minor diagnostic criteria based on clinical symptoms of AD. Williams coordinated a UK working party to attempt to simplify and refine the criteria given by Hanifin and Rajka in 1994. Severity of disease is evaluated by using widely accepted SCORing Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD), based on extent of area involved, severity of symptoms and intensity of the subjective symptoms of pruritus and sleep disturbances.The chronic and recurrent nature of AD negatively impacts the quality of life (QOL) of patients as well as their family members. The symptoms of AD limit patient's physical, psychosocial development and quality of sleep.
The main goals of treatment are to improve the skin barrier function and hydration, to suppress inflammation and to control microbial colonization. It can be achieved through emollients, topical corticosteroids and topical calcineurin inhibitor like tacrolimus. Oral drugs like corticosteroids, methotrexate and cyclosporine are reserved for severe cases.
Probiotics are defined by World Health Orgnization as "live microorganisms, which when consumed in adequate amounts, confer a health effect on the host."Under the hypothesis that probiotics have global allergy protective effect, they have been extensively used for several conditions like inflammatory bowel disease, bronchial asthma and other allergic diseases. If children who are genetically predisposed to AD are supplemented with probiotics early in their life, series of events like antigenic competition, immune regulation and stimulation of innate immunity will occur, all of which might minimize their susceptibility to allergic disorders. Hence, investigators planned this study to see its role in AD.
Statement of problem and rationale:
The rationale for this therapeutic option is based on well-established effects of bacteria on cellular immune responses. The probiotics has an immunomodulatory property that plays an essential role in the development of normal immune tolerance. Early life exposure to these microbial agents plays an important role in maturation of Type 1 helper cell (Th1) immune responses and could inhibit development of allergic Type 2 helper cell (Th2) responses and IgE antibody production. Therefore the onset of AD could be prevented by probiotics and this treatment strategy could also be effective even when AD is already established.
In a meta-analysis conducted in 2017, involving 13 randomized controlled trials (RCT) with 1,070 children, significant difference in SCORAD values favoring probiotics over the control group was observed. Though, a high degree of heterogeneity was observed across these 13 trials.
Cochrane review, 2018 which included 39 RCTs found that probiotic treatment may slightly reduce SCORAD value. However the researcher concluded that the differences were not clinically significant. Recent review in 2019 on "prebiotics and probiotics in atopic dermatitis" based on various RCT and meta-analysis support the supplementation of probiotics for at least 8 weeks in improving severity score of AD.
Investigators have observed conflicting results of different studies with some showing significant advantages while some studies revealing no benefit. Almost all of the studies have suggested further research in different populations. Therefore, we are conducting this study to find out the effect of probiotics in AD in our institute.
OBJECTIVES
- Primary objective: To investigate the efficacy of oral probiotics in the clinical outcome of Atopic dermatitis based on the SCORAD index
- Secondary objectives: To find out the total duration of topical corticosteroid use in the interventional and conventional group.
To assess the impact of AD in children's family members based on FDLQI (Family Dermatology Life Quality Index)
MATERIALS AND METHODS Type of study design: Assessor blinded, randomized controlled trial. Setting: Hospital (Dermatology Outpatient Department, BPKIHS, Dharan). The probable duration of the study will be one year after approval from the Institutional Review Committee and Nepal Health Research Council (NHRC). Ethical Clearance: taken from the Institutional Review Committee (IRC), BPKIHS, and Nepal Health Research Council (NHRC).
Calculation of the sample size: According to a study done by Ekaputri et.al, it is reported that mean± SD of SCORAD index after intervention in probiotic group and control group was (18.09 ± 8.59) and (23.21± 8.71) respectively. Considering the least difference, 5.12 and pooled SD- 8.65, the sample size has been calculated at 95% CI and 80% power, using two means formula.
n = 44.56, adding 10% in calculated value for lost to follow-up, final sample size is 45 in each group. Thus a total of 98 patients will be enrolled.
n = 2σ2 (Z α/2 + Z β) 2 (μ1- μ2) 2
n= sample size of each group. σ = standard deviation 8.65 Z = reliability coefficient. 1.96 α = significance level. 0.05 Zβ= at 20% power 0.84 μ1 = mean (Probiotic) 18.09 μ2 = mean (Control) 23.21 d = mean difference 5.12
Randomization and allocation concealment:
A block randomization list will be generated with the block sizes 4, 6 and 8. Two parallel groups (1:1 ratio) of patients following computerized randomization will be produced. Prior to the enrollment of the patients a sequentially generated number with the treatment group will be written in sealed envelope, which will be prepared by independent dermatologist.
Interventional and conventional groups:
Interventional group: Children with AD meeting eligibility criteria receiving probiotics and conventional treatment (topical corticosteroid, topical tacrolimus, an oral antihistamine and emollients) Conventional group: Children with AD meeting eligibility criteria, under conventional treatment only.
Follow up:
Each patient will be asked for their follow up at 2, 4, 6, 8, 10 and 12 weeks of commencing treatment. In each follow up, every patient will be evaluated for the side effects and compliance to treatment. SCORAD index will be measured at baseline and at 4, 8, 10 and 12 weeks. FDLQI will be measured at baseline and at 8 weeks. Parents will be provided a card to record for flare of symptoms; total days of steroid use for the same and total flare episode will be recorded during 12 weeks follow up. Flare is defined as worsening of clinical features leading to use of corticosteroids for at least 3 consecutive days.
Family dermatology life quality index:
Parents or guardian of each children will be asked to fill the questionnaire intended to measure quality of life of family members whose relative have dermatological conditions. The standardized nepali version of FDLQI (MKA Basra, AY Finlay. Cardiff University 2005) will be used. Questions concern the influence of disease on parents QOL in the last month. Each question can be answered by selecting 1 out of 4 answers scored 0-3. The maximum score is 30 points and minimum 0 point. The higher the score lower the parents QOL.
Severity Index (SCORAD) It uses the rule of nine to assess extent of disease and evaluates five clinical characteristics to determine disease severity: i) erythema, ii) edema/ papulation, iii) oozing/crusts, iv) excoriation and v) lichenification. It also assesses subjective symptoms of pruritus and sleep loss with Visual Analogue Scales (VAS).
Based on SCORAD score, AD is categorized as
- Mild AD (SCORAD <25)
- Moderate (SCORAD 25-50)
- Severe (SCORAD >50)
Statistical Analysis:
Statistical analysis will be conducted both per protocol and intention to treat population (defined as all enrolled children to whom study drug will be given; with the last observation carried forward) basis using two sided tests.
Statistical methods proposed:
- Descriptive statistics will be summarized as mean, median, percentage, standard deviation (SD) and interquartile range along with appropriate graphical and tabular presentation.
- Intragroup SCORAD index and FDLQI score will be compared by paired t-test and between the groups by independent t- test.
- In case of nonparametric data Mann- Whitney U test for independent groups and Wilcoxon signed- rank test for paired group will be used.
- Chi-square test will be used to compare the categorical data. All statistical tests will be carried out at a significance level P<0.05.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Assessor blinded, randomized controlled trial.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Group A (Interventional group) | Experimental | Drug: Probiotic sachet containing mixture of four strains i.e.Lactobacillus rhamnosus, Lactobacillus acidophilus, Bifidobacterium longum, and Saccharomyces boulardii, Drug: Conventional treatmentAlong with below mentioned conventional treatment, the participants in group A (i.e. Interventional group) will receive conventional treatment of AD for a short duration along with probiotics for 8 weeks. One probiotic sachet twice a day will be prescribed. A sachet of 2 grams containing 1.25 billion cells per gram of 4 strains (Lactobacillus rhamnosus, Lactobacillus acidophilus, Bifidobacterium longum, and Saccharomyces boulardii) will be used. The child will receive a total of 5 billion cells of probiotics per day. |
| Group B (Conventional group) | Active comparator | Drug: Conventional treatmentAll patients (i.e. in both arms) with atopic dermatitis will be prescribed emollients and cleanser as a part of routine skin care. Topical corticosteroid (i.e. Fluticasone 0.05% cream) and topical calcineurin inhibitor (tacrolimus 0.1% ointment) for sensitive areas like periorbital regions, flexures and face, will be given once daily. All patients will be given an oral antihistamine (syrup/ tablet cetirizine 0.3mg/kg) at night. It is referred to as conventional treatment. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 4 to 17 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Children with a diagnosis of atopic dermatitis that meet Hanifin and Rajka criteria
- SCORAD ( SCORing Atopic Dermatitis) index 15- 50 at the time of enrollment
Key exclusion criteria (9 listed)
- SCORAD (SCORing Atopic Dermatitis) index <15 or >50.
- Children treated with systemic corticosteroids, methotrexate, or cyclosporine in the previous 3 months and antibiotics in the previous 2 weeks.
- Immunocompromised children.
- Concomitant diagnosis of intolerance to gluten and/ or lactose.
- Pre-existing hypersensitivity to components contained in the probiotics.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Probiotic sachet containing mixture of four strains i.e.Lactobacillus rhamnosus, Lactobacillus acidophilus, Bifidobacterium longum, and Saccharomyces boulardiiInterventional group: Children with AD meeting eligibility criteria receiving probiotics and conventional treatment (topical corticosteroid, topical tacrolimus, an oral antihistamine and emollients). | Drug | Group A (Interventional group) |
| Conventional treatmenttopical corticosteroid, topical tacrolimus, an oral antihistamine and emollients as per atopic dermatitis treatment guidelines. | Drug | Group A (Interventional group), Group B (Conventional group) |
Primary outcome
Number of participants in each sex group
Time frame: At the time of enrollment
Sex distribution of Atopic Dermatitis patients in male, female or others group
Duration
Time frame: At the time of enrollment
Duration of Atopic Dermatitis
History Of Atopy
Time frame: Enrollment
Personal or Family history of atopy
Change in SCORing Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) index
Time frame: Enrollment, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 10 weeks and 12 weeks of treatment
Based on three aspects, extent of disease, disease severity and subjective symptoms combine to give a maximum possible score of 103.
4 secondary outcomes
Number of participants having each of systemic illnesses
Time frame: Enrollment
Number of participants who had taken past treatment
Time frame: Enrollment
Age of Onset
Time frame: Enrollment
Change in Family Dermatology Life Quality Index
Time frame: At the time of enrollment and at 8 weeks of commencing treatment.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 16 Dec 2021.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Atopic Dermatitis
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
A Phase I Study of GLR2053 Tablets in Chinese Healthy Adult Participants
Atopic Dermatitis
RecruitingObservational study
Blood, Urine, and Tissue Collection for Cutaneous Lymphoma, Eczema, and Atopic Dermatitis Research
Cutaneous T-cell Lymphoma, Sezary Syndrome
RecruitingPhase 1
First-in-Human Trial to Assess REGN20423 in Healthy Adult Participants and Adult Participants With Atopic Dermatitis
Healthy Volunteer, Atopic Dermatitis
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
A Study of HSK60002 Tablets in Participants With Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis
Dermatitis Atopic
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study to Learn About the Study Medicine Called Tilrekimig in People With Moderate-to Severe Eczema
Atopic Dermatitis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Probiotic sachet containing mixture of four strains i.e.Lactobacillus rhamnosus, Lactobacillus acidophilus, Bifidobacterium longum, and Saccharomyces boulardii and Conventional treatment in people with Atopic Dermatitis, run by B.P. Koirala Institute of Health Sciences at 1 site in Nepal.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Dec 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Nepal. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Number of participants in each sex group (time frame: At the time of enrollment). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Dec 2021.