AnesthesiaNCT04707014
Hypnoanalgesia for Dermatological Surgery in Children
A study testing Hypnosis and Attention-distracting techniques in people with Anesthesia, run by Complejo Hospitalario de Toledo at 1 site in Spain.
Trial summary
This randomized clinical trial will evaluate the effect of hypnosedation on the need of sedation and analgesia in a pediatric population undergoing dermatological surgery, both during the procedure, and 24 hours after surgery. In addition, a secondary objetive is to evaluate the effect by specific age groups. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 5 to 16 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Anesthesia
- What is being tested?
- Hypnosis and Attention-distracting techniques
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion, Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 28 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSpain
- Study dates
- 1 Nov 2017to 30 Apr 2018
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 5 to 16 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child
Who may be able to join
- A class I or II of anaesthetic risk according to the American Society of Anesthesiologists,
- to be in a percentile between P3 and P97 in weight and height,
- without known drug allergies, and
- having fasted 6 hours for solids and 2 hours for water.
Who cannot join
- Children with diagnosed mental retardation or attention deficit,
- behavioural disorders,
- previous treatment with hypnosis,
- history of neurological pathology or psychomotor retardation,
- previous pain-related pathology,
- obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome (OSAS)
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Effectiveness of Hypnoanalgesia for Dermatological Surgery in Children: Randomised Clinical Trial
This randomized clinical trial will evaluate the effect of hypnosedation on the need of sedation and analgesia in a pediatric population undergoing dermatological surgery, both during the procedure, and 24 hours after surgery. In addition, a secondary objetive is to evaluate the effect by specific age groups.
Read the detailed description
In this clinical trial, pediatric patients scheduled for removal of benign skin lesions in a single center willbe randomised to receive hypnosis (intervention group) or attention-distracting techniques (control group). Endpoints will be the sedative dose (propofol) during surgery, and the need for analgesia (paracetamol and others) immediately after surgery (recovery) and after 24 hours. Randomization will be systematic in blocks depending on the day the surgery is programmed. Hypnosis will be delivered by an experienced anesthesist trained in the technique. Patients and families will be informed of the special treatment during surgery, but will be unaware of whether the patients are experiencing distraction or hypnosis techniques. Distraction is already a useful technique, and it is expected that patients will be satisfied with the procedure; however, the hypothesis to be tested is that hypnosis reduces the need for sedation and analgesia compared to distraction techniques, as well as improves satisfaction.
- Conditions
- Anesthesia
- Being tested
- Hypnosis, Attention-distracting techniques
- Keywords
- analgesia, anxiety, pain, paediatric surgery, dermatology, Hypnosis, Nervous System Diseases Central, Hypnotics and Sedatives, Nervous System Depressants, Physiological Effects of Drugs
- Medical subject headings
- Agnosia, Anxiety Disorders, Pain, Central Nervous System Diseases
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
HypnosisBehavioural
Also called Hypnoanalgesia, Hypnosedation
Rapid conversational hypnosis
Attention-distracting techniquesBehavioural
i-pad with movies, games and music
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Attention-Distraction techniques | Placebo comparator | A high-tech distraction technique (Apple®), passive and chosen by the child, either an animated video or his or her favourite music. After standard intravenous sedation, the child is taken to the operating theatre to watch his or her favourite video or music and this is maintained throughout the procedure. Receives: Behavioral: Attention-distracting techniques |
| HIPNOSIS GROUP | Experimental | A technique of rapid conversational hypnosis, with focus on therapeutic suggestion (guiding the patient into a hypnotic trance), adapted to the child's cognitive development. Induction with hypnotic suggestion focuses and accompanies the child's body sensations and allows their active participation. After standard sedation, therapeutic suggestion is maintained throughout the surgery and in the post-hypnotic period before awakening. Receives: Behavioral: Hypnosis |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Total dose of propofol in mg/kg
Measured in mg/kg weight
Measured: During surgery (Intra-operative)
Total dose of propofol in mg
Measured in total mg
Measured: During surgery (Intra-operative)
Additional need for opioids during surgery
Yes/no
Measured: During surgery (Intra-operative)
Secondary outcomes (6)
Pain intensity in older children post-operative
0-10 visual analogue scale (VAS) administered by a blinded nurse, with higher values indicating higher levels of pain
Measured: Immediately post-operative while on recovery unit
Pain intensity in younger children post-operative
0-10 Faces Pain Scale - Revised (FPS-r) administered by a blinded nurse, with higher values indicating higher levels of pain
Measured: Immediately post-operative while on recovery unit
Pain intensity in older children after 24 hours
0-10 visual analogue scale (VAS) administered over the phone by a blinded nurse, with higher values indicating higher levels of pain
Measured: 24 hours after discharge
Pain intensity in younger children after 24 hours
0-10 Faces Pain Scale - Revised (FPS-r) administered over the phone by a blinded nurse, with higher values indicating higher levels of pain
Measured: 24 hours after discharge
Analgesic need
Recorded by a blinded nurse at reanimation unit as yes/no
Measured: 24 hours after discharge
Analgesic needs
Recorded by a blinded nurse by telephone call as yes/no
Measured: 24 hours after discharge
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted13 Jan 2021
- Study start1 Nov 2017
- Primary completion15 Apr 2018
- Study completion30 Apr 2018
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (4)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for AnesthesiaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Patients are randomly distributed to one of the following groups: Intervention group: Technique of rapid conversational hypnosis, with focus on therapeutic suggestion (guiding the patient into a hypnotic trance), adapted to child's cognitive development. Induction with hypnotic suggestion focuses and accompanies the child's body sensations and allows their active participation. After standard sedation, therapeutic suggestion is maintained throughout the surgery and in the post-hypnotic period before awakening. Control group: High-tech distraction technique (Apple®), passive and chosen by the child, either an animated video or his or her favourite music. After standard intravenous sedation, the child is taken to the operating theatre to watch his or her favourite video or music and this is maintained throughout the procedure.
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 28 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Complejo Hospitalario de Toledo
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, JUANA MARIA PELAEZ PEREZ, Complejo Hospitalario de Toledo
- Investigators
- Juana Maria PELAEZ PEREZ, PH, Principal investigator, Complejo Hospitalario Toledo
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04707014
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CHT00028
- Status last verified
- Jan 2021
- First submitted
- 17 Sep 2020
- Last updated
- 13 Jan 2021
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Any document upon reasonable request to the PI.
Publications
Friedrichsdorf SJ, Kohen DP. Integration of hypnosis into pediatric palliative care. Ann Palliat Med. 2018 Jan;7(1):136-150. doi: 10.21037/apm.2017.05.02. Epub 2017 Jun 27.
PubMed 28866891Kendrick C, Sliwinski J, Yu Y, Johnson A, Fisher W, Kekecs Z, Elkins G. Hypnosis for Acute Procedural Pain: A Critical Review. Int J Clin Exp Hypn. 2016;64(1):75-115. doi: 10.1080/00207144.2015.1099405.
PubMed 26599994Brown ML, Rojas E, Gouda S. A Mind-Body Approach to Pediatric Pain Management. Children (Basel). 2017 Jun 20;4(6):50. doi: 10.3390/children4060050.
PubMed 28632194Friedrichsdorf SJ, Goubert L. Pediatric pain treatment and prevention for hospitalized children. Pain Rep. 2019 Dec 19;5(1):e804. doi: 10.1097/PR9.0000000000000804. eCollection 2020 Jan-Feb.
PubMed 32072099
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 13 Jan 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Effectiveness of Hypnoanalgesia for Dermatological Surgery in Children: Randomised Clinical Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04707014
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CHT00028
- Conditions
- Anesthesia
- Keywords
- analgesia, anxiety, pain, paediatric surgery, dermatology, Hypnosis, Nervous System Diseases Central, Hypnotics and Sedatives
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 28 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Complejo Hospitalario de ToledoUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Nov 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 15 Apr 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Apr 2018 (actual)
- First posted
- 13 Jan 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This randomized clinical trial will evaluate the effect of hypnosedation on the need of sedation and analgesia in a pediatric population undergoing dermatological surgery, both during the procedure, and 24 hours after surgery. In addition, a secondary objetive is to evaluate the effect by specific age groups.
Detailed description
In this clinical trial, pediatric patients scheduled for removal of benign skin lesions in a single center willbe randomised to receive hypnosis (intervention group) or attention-distracting techniques (control group). Endpoints will be the sedative dose (propofol) during surgery, and the need for analgesia (paracetamol and others) immediately after surgery (recovery) and after 24 hours. Randomization will be systematic in blocks depending on the day the surgery is programmed. Hypnosis will be delivered by an experienced anesthesist trained in the technique. Patients and families will be informed of the special treatment during surgery, but will be unaware of whether the patients are experiencing distraction or hypnosis techniques. Distraction is already a useful technique, and it is expected that patients will be satisfied with the procedure; however, the hypothesis to be tested is that hypnosis reduces the need for sedation and analgesia compared to distraction techniques, as well as improves satisfaction.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Patients are randomly distributed to one of the following groups: Intervention group: Technique of rapid conversational hypnosis, with focus on therapeutic suggestion (guiding the patient into a hypnotic trance), adapted to child's cognitive development. Induction with hypnotic suggestion focuses and accompanies the child's body sensations and allows their active participation. After standard sedation, therapeutic suggestion is maintained throughout the surgery and in the post-hypnotic period before awakening. Control group: High-tech distraction technique (Apple®), passive and chosen by the child, either an animated video or his or her favourite music. After standard intravenous sedation, the child is taken to the operating theatre to watch his or her favourite video or music and this is maintained throughout the procedure.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Attention-Distraction techniques | Placebo comparator | Behavioral: Attention-distracting techniquesA high-tech distraction technique (Apple®), passive and chosen by the child, either an animated video or his or her favourite music. After standard intravenous sedation, the child is taken to the operating theatre to watch his or her favourite video or music and this is maintained throughout the procedure. |
| HIPNOSIS GROUP | Experimental | Behavioral: HypnosisA technique of rapid conversational hypnosis, with focus on therapeutic suggestion (guiding the patient into a hypnotic trance), adapted to the child's cognitive development. Induction with hypnotic suggestion focuses and accompanies the child's body sensations and allows their active participation. After standard sedation, therapeutic suggestion is maintained throughout the surgery and in the post-hypnotic period before awakening. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 5 to 16 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- A class I or II of anaesthetic risk according to the American Society of Anesthesiologists,
- to be in a percentile between P3 and P97 in weight and height,
- without known drug allergies, and
- having fasted 6 hours for solids and 2 hours for water.
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Children with diagnosed mental retardation or attention deficit,
- behavioural disorders,
- previous treatment with hypnosis,
- history of neurological pathology or psychomotor retardation,
- previous pain-related pathology,
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| HypnosisAlso: Hypnoanalgesia, HypnosedationRapid conversational hypnosis | Behavioural | HIPNOSIS GROUP |
| Attention-distracting techniquesi-pad with movies, games and music | Behavioural | Attention-Distraction techniques |
Primary outcome
Total dose of propofol in mg/kg
Time frame: During surgery (Intra-operative)
Measured in mg/kg weight
Total dose of propofol in mg
Time frame: During surgery (Intra-operative)
Measured in total mg
Additional need for opioids during surgery
Time frame: During surgery (Intra-operative)
Yes/no
6 secondary outcomes
Pain intensity in older children post-operative
Time frame: Immediately post-operative while on recovery unit
Pain intensity in younger children post-operative
Time frame: Immediately post-operative while on recovery unit
Pain intensity in older children after 24 hours
Time frame: 24 hours after discharge
Pain intensity in younger children after 24 hours
Time frame: 24 hours after discharge
Analgesic need
Time frame: 24 hours after discharge
Analgesic needs
Time frame: 24 hours after discharge
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 13 Jan 2021.
- Background: PubMed 28866891Friedrichsdorf SJ, Kohen DP. Integration of hypnosis into pediatric palliative care. Ann Palliat Med. 2018 Jan;7(1):136-150. doi: 10.21037/apm.2017.05.02. Epub 2017 Jun 27.
- Background: PubMed 26599994Kendrick C, Sliwinski J, Yu Y, Johnson A, Fisher W, Kekecs Z, Elkins G. Hypnosis for Acute Procedural Pain: A Critical Review. Int J Clin Exp Hypn. 2016;64(1):75-115. doi: 10.1080/00207144.2015.1099405.
- Background: PubMed 28632194Brown ML, Rojas E, Gouda S. A Mind-Body Approach to Pediatric Pain Management. Children (Basel). 2017 Jun 20;4(6):50. doi: 10.3390/children4060050.
- Background: PubMed 32072099Friedrichsdorf SJ, Goubert L. Pediatric pain treatment and prevention for hospitalized children. Pain Rep. 2019 Dec 19;5(1):e804. doi: 10.1097/PR9.0000000000000804. eCollection 2020 Jan-Feb.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Any document upon reasonable request to the PI.
Related trials for Anesthesia
Not yet recruitingObservational study
"Comparison of Oxygen Reserve Index (ORI), End-Tidal Oxygen, and Time-Based Preoxygenation Targets With Arterial Blood Gas During Preoxygenation
Preoxygenation Adequacy Assessed by Oxygen Reserve Index, End-tidal Oxygen and Arterial Blood Gas
RecruitingObservational study
Comparison of Hemodynamic Responses During Anesthesia Induction Using Eleveld and Schnider
Spinal (Fusion) Surgery, Total Intravenous Anesthesia
Not yet recruiting
A Randomized Controlled SaCo-VLM Trial
General Anaesthesia Using Supraglotic Airway
Not yet recruiting
Bispectral Index-Guided Propofol Sedation During Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography
Deep Sedation, Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography
RecruitingPhase 4
Comparison of Hemodynamics and Respiratory Function Between Ciprofol and Propofol in Elderly Patients Undergoing Non-intubated General Anesthesia
Comparison of Hemodynamics and Respiratory Function Between Ciprofol and Propofol in Elderly Patients Undergoing Non-intubated General Anesthesia
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Juana Maria PELAEZ PEREZ, PH principal investigator
Complejo Hospitalario Toledo
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Hypnosis and Attention-distracting techniques in people with Anesthesia, run by Complejo Hospitalario de Toledo at 1 site in Spain.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Jan 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Spain. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Total dose of propofol in mg/kg (time frame: During surgery (Intra-operative)). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04707014, which also lists 4 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Jan 2021.